This is topic Monster's Ball in forum Film Handlers' Movie Reviews at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=000265
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 02-10-2002, 06:20 PM:
02/10/02, Cinemark 17, Springfield OR, 1:35PM, Theater #10, scope, Dolby Digital. Very good presentation, no complaints. About 100 people there.An intense story of flawed people in a small town who experience loss and are brought together by fate or circumstance or whatever you want to call it. You could cut the tension in the theater with the proverbial knife, and there was no telling how things would unfold. Very unpleasant to watch in places, also very steamy (wondering how this escaped an NC-17). Billy Bob Thornton and Halle Berry are great. Not recommended if you want an entertaining 2-hour "diversion".
------------------
- dave
I want that North American cable deal!
Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 02-12-2002, 09:42 PM:
I just got back from Monster's Ball. David, I agree with you completely. Well said. This is a very interesting film about people that might seem very one dimensional at first. This film does a fantastic job of delving into its characters without getting cumbersome or sappy. It wouldn't have worked without the wonderful performances of Billy Bob Thornton and Halle Berry. Peter Boyle deserves a great deal of credit as well.
Posted by Neil Hunter (Member # 1005) on 02-19-2002, 04:06 AM:
I liked this one a lot, as I do with other Billy Bob Thornton movies. It was nice how they developed the characters, it seemed more realistic. Billy Bob and Halle Barry's characters both went through very diffeicult things, and lived hard lives. It was good that in the end they both got what they needed. Definetly worth the $7.50 I paid to watch this one. The ending will sneak up on you though. But when it does, it is so good that you don't even mind the suddeness of it.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-19-2002, 07:02 PM:
I finally got around to watching "Monsters Ball" last night at the Carmike 8, and its a good thing I did since the theater will lose this print on Thursday as three others arrive (including "E.T.: 20" and "Blade II")."Monsters Ball" is a disturbing film and means to be that way from the void-like feel you get right off from the opening titles and the sort of ghost like life Hank Grotowski leads. The audience learns early on that he has one seriously screwed up "family" where showing anything like care for another person is deemed as weakness. His father (Peter Boyle) is racist and sexist. His son, Sonny (played by Heath Ledger) shows the emotional toll paid for having such an empty and hateful family. Hank is made to pay for his sins of being a bad father.
The story takes an unlikely turn in circumstance when Hank meets and befriends Leticia Musgrove, who coincidentally is the wife of a death row inmate he guarded. The friendship turns into one of forbidden love between race and class. They're only united out of intense loss and pain. Even then, the union seems frought with a lot of risk. That's no surprise given how emotionally unhealthy the principal characters seem to be. But viewers do get hope in that things like love and passion can manage to spark in some very morbid places and morbid hearts. I thought it was a clever story move to portray Sonny's hotel room encounter with a call girl in a very cold and clinical fashion. It turns into a good juxtaposition to the real passion happening later in the story. The only area where I can fault "Monsters Ball" is in having some story event lines that come off a little too convenient to get Hank and Leticia together. And some areas seem to quickly "resolved". I can't really go into specifics without spoiling parts of the story. Let's just say there were some possibilities in the story that were strangely left unexplored. I did really like the ambiguous ending. That's how life really plays. Nothing gets wrapped up nice and neat, and maybe that tells us to appreciate the fleeting times we have with those we love.
Show technical quality: very good, at least in terms of hardware. I watched the film in scope and DTS-6 on screen #2 (one of the smaller ones in the theater). The print was in very good condition after several weeks of play (no scratches and hardly a speck of dust). I do wish the cinematography was better. Certainly this is a gritty movie, but the Super35 photography was not only grainy, but the image quality was blurry even though you could see the film grain sharply. It reminded me of some underlit 16mm shows. I actually think this film would have been better shot in 1.85:1. The sound quality was good for the subject matter. Even though "Monsters Ball" features a quad format print (which is rare for a Lion's Gate release), much of the digital sound stays up on the front stage with just a little ambient audio happening in the surrounds. The music score seemed to be one of the few things I heard all around in the speakers.
Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 06-02-2002, 12:20 PM:
Just screened this film for myself here in the UK as it hasn't opened yet. The story is very serious and involving and i agree with outhe coments that it wouldn't be the same with out Billy Bob or Halle, It was nice to see some picture detail, allthough a bit grainy, but compard to EPII which has been in this screen snce its opening, it looked like 70mm! The film i feel is well edited and the soundtrack helps the movie along, but doesn't standout, so it does it's job well in my opinion.
Good film, not one to watch if you want light hearted entertainment.
Darren
Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 06-04-2003, 07:01 PM:
I just watched this film on video the other night.
What a waste of time!
If Halle Berry's performance was Oscar material, then a porn star like Jenna Jameson should recieve a major entertainment award every time she pokes her head out in public!
I am still trying to figure out what is so great about Halle Berry? The only other pic I have seen her in is the recent James Bond film, which was also nothing to rave about. Lord knows that I have seen many women walking down the street who are far more attractive than Berry!
As for Berry's husband in the flic...he admitted to being a terrible person? The film does nothing to explain the circumstances of his crime, which leaves the viewer hanging. The film does try to get the audience to be sympathetic towards him. If his crime was haneous and deserving of the death penality...then I have no sympathy!
As for Berry's character: What is she...to stupid or ignorant to ask for help...to find a way of trying to improve her life...? She could have gone to the local DES for help? And Thorton's character would not have a clue about government assistance programs? After all he was a warden, and just how many inmate education programs exist in prison today? As a parent, Berry could not control her kid's eating disorder? Where the hell was he getting the money to buy junk food in the first place? Being a minor, was the kid not in public school? And if he was, Berry could not ask the school for help?
What about Berry's lame...very lame....temper tantrum when she learns that Thorton was in charge of her husband's execution?
I cannot believe that the IDIOTS at the MPAA would only give this an "R" rating. This is borderline "X".
Posted by Michael Brown (Member # 890) on 06-04-2003, 07:08 PM:
In the UK it was only given a '15' rating. With the highest being '18'. I didn't think the film was that adult. The '15' certificate suited.