This is topic K-19: The Widowmaker in forum Film Handlers' Movie Reviews at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=000355
Posted by Mike Schindler (Member # 1309) on 07-19-2002, 04:19 PM:
This movie was a big disappointment. I was expecting a lot more out of Kathryn Bigelow after STRANGE DAYS. But this thing just took forever to get where it was going, and once it got there, it really wasn't that great. I really really love Walter Murch, but he sure does like to take his sweet-ass time with things. And, boy, he's like the king of dramatic pauses. It got to be really annoying.
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 07-21-2002, 05:29 PM:
07/21/2002, 12:10PM, #6, Regal Cinema World 8, Eugene OR. Probably DTS. Attendance only about 10 (yikes!). Presentation was good except once again the surrounds didn't seem to be working.Certain actors should not do accents. Harrison Ford for example. After seeing the trailers with him doing a Russian accent, I had a bad feeling about this. But Ford and Liam Neeson both kept the accents to a minimum so that wasn't a distraction. Despite it being very melodramatic at times, I actually liked this a lot. Ford and Neeson both give excellent performances. The action sequences aboard the sub are well-done and believeable, not to mention unsettling. But I think they could have trimmed 10 mins. out of this without doing any damage. I liked the way the story remained almost totally focused on the sub and its crew and there was very minimal cutting away to the Kremlin, and none to the Americans. It must have been tempting to show the US perspective of this incident.
Posted by John Daily (Member # 1362) on 07-24-2002, 10:52 PM:
I agree; 10-15 minutes cut would have helped this film immensely. We got the point about the drills early on, for example. I enjoyed K-19, but the 3 acts were too defined. You could actually tell where one act ended and the next began.A good film that just narrowly misses being great.
Posted by Aaron Haney (Member # 747) on 07-27-2002, 06:32 AM:
I saw the trailer so many times I was almost sick of the movie before I got to see it. But it surprised me. Not great, but pretty good. The accents were pretty bad, though. Both Ford and Neeson messed them up several times.I have to say this movie is exquisitely photographed. It's one of the best looking Super-35 films I've seen. I only wish they hadn't added anamorphic lens flares to the computer effects shots -- they didn't match the rest of the movie!
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 11-08-2002, 08:18 AM:
Three words...Oh my yawn.Harrison, what the hell are you doing?
If this is the best role you can get...putting on silly make-up with an even sillier accent...no wonder you've 'made room in your schedule' to make Indiana 4.
Very sad.
------------------
"It's not the years, honey. It's the mileage." Indiana Jones
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 12-31-2002, 02:15 AM:
I saw the title and laughed and laughed... but then realized this film could actually be good.
I liked it quite a bit, regardless of bad accents.
Anyone remember that scottish fellow, I mean russian fellow in hunt for red october? Just suspend disbelief and have a good time. So ford cant do russian, I can and no one cares a damn bit!
Good film, fun for a couple of viewings.
Dave