Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Boogeyman

This is topic Boogeyman in forum Film Handlers' Movie Reviews at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=000887

Posted by Don Anderson (Member # 397) on 02-04-2005, 02:14 AM:

Another piece of crap. Almost as BAD as "Alone in the Dark". This movie goes nowhere fast!!!!! Let's see how long it takes to get to video. Our print had lots of white dust spots and hair imprinted on it. Watching the piracy codes and the dust was more enjoyable than the feature. Getting drunk won't help either.

Posted by Jason M Miller (Member # 2597) on 02-04-2005, 10:46 PM:

Yes the movie it self was crap, but the scares made up for it. There was multiple (yes that is more then once) times I jumped.

Posted by Darren Crimmins (Member # 1116) on 02-07-2005, 11:06 PM:

While I agree that there are plenty of places that make you jump, they are all just scenes where it is quiet, then a loud noise to "scare" you. These don't neccesarily make the scene scary at all, they are just "cheap scares". Any movie can have these in them, but if a horror movie is relying entirely on those, that is a very bad sign. The movie was horrible with nothing suspenseful or remotely scary about it. Also, a PG-13 horror movie? Why bother?

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 02-08-2005, 12:12 AM:

I agree....PG-13 horror isn't very good. This was just too boring. The graphics of the boogeyman were cool though.

1.3/5 for the graphics

Posted by Jared Foley (Member # 3004) on 02-17-2005, 06:40 AM:

On the print our place received, the tails all said "Boogyman". How common are misspellings like this?

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 02-17-2005, 09:53 AM:

My print too