This is topic The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) in forum Film Handlers' Movie Reviews at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=002039

Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 05-03-2014, 12:11 PM:
 
CINEMA: Regal Village Square, Las Vegas, NV
AUDITORIUM: 11
PRESENTATION: Sony Digital 4K (2D)
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: LF channel audio buzz
RATING: Two and one half stars (out of four)

THE PLOT: A dopey guy gets super powers through a horrible accident and doesn't use them for good. Wackiness ensues.

Well, that's ONE of the plots, anyway. There's enough going on here that it wouldn't take a lot of effort to put in some filler characters and turn this script into a season-long television series. And with a few action scene exceptions, this movie FEELS like a television series, quality-wise. It's worth watching, but it's not even close to being a great super hero movie.

A friend of mine went to a Thursday evening "special advance screening" show and said the attendance was...four. The theatre manager told him it was the worst attendance for any Thursday opening she'd seen. Attendance at my Friday matinee was twelve.

THAT doesn't bode well.
 
Posted by Jonathan Goeldner (Member # 4854) on 05-03-2014, 12:19 PM:
 
curious to see the box office numbers come out Monday for the weekend gross.

Friday numbers: $35,500,000 intake / 4,324 screens / $8,210 average per screen
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-03-2014, 01:38 PM:
 
We only had 12 people for the Thursday show but I attribute that to the fact they didn't let us know we could do a Thursday show until Monday, so we didn't have much time to promote it. Also, having that pesky "May 2" date on the posters didn't help, plus May 1 was a school nite.

Having said all that, our crowd last night wasn't very good either -- we didn't even have a line when we opened, which is very unusual for a Marvel movie.

But, people exiting are saying they liked it, so word of mouth should be good.
 
Posted by Marcel Birgelen (Member # 6801) on 05-03-2014, 05:47 PM:
 
Does Sony really think that people's collective memory doesn't stretch until 2007?

Disney called and they want their Spider Man back. Sony's license on those characters is running out and they obviously wanted to cash in on them while the fun lasts.

But instead of doing something out-of-the-ordinary with the franchise, they opted for just another reboot, only 5 years after the fact, telling roughly the same stories yet again. Although the 2012 film wasn't all that bad, many people felt cheated and some even boycotted it entirely.

All in all, I have the distinct feeling people are slowly getting tired of all those comic superhero movies. Especially Marvel is on their way of over-saturating the market...
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-03-2014, 06:14 PM:
 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
All in all, I have the distinct feeling people are slowly getting tired of all those comic superhero movies. Especially Marvel is on their way of over-saturating the market...
I agree. Especially since they are all essentially the same, once you get past the sideline story about the personality of the hero, it's all the same crash-bang-boom with no regard to physics.

The one I'm dreading this summer is the Transformers movie. I was about ready to pull the remaining hair out of my head after 2 weeks of listening to that last noisy crapfest.
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 05-04-2014, 11:14 AM:
 
quote: Jonathan Goeldner
curious to see the box office numbers come out Monday for the weekend gross.

Friday numbers: $35,500,000 intake / 4,324 screens / $8,210 average per screen

It really is Amazing how Spider-mans first shows are just getting started today, yet the box office performance has already been determined for the weekend.

http://www.deadline.com/2014/05/amazing-spider-man-2-box-office-opening-big-debut/

quote: Marcel Birgelen
All in all, I have the distinct feeling people are slowly getting tired of all those comic superhero movies. Especially Marvel is on their way of over-saturating the market...
LOL, I highly doubt that. The box office performance is proving otherwise.

On another note, is this the first SONY movie to use the new SONY logo intro before the Colombia Pictures logo?
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 05-04-2014, 01:09 PM:
 
Really seemed to underwhelm here as well. We sent employees home early Friday and Saturday, despite being short-staffed already. No shows sold out.

I got sent home early on Friday night, decided to drive down to KC to catch it in AMC Prime at 11:30pm. I really enjoyed it, but enjoyed Captain America more.

There were about 20-30 people in my screening.
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 05-04-2014, 01:44 PM:
 
How was AMC prime?
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 05-04-2014, 03:40 PM:
 
I love it. I try to make a point to see every feature in Dolby Atmos in that house. It doesn't give me a headache like IMAX does.

I. Love. Dolby. Atmos.

To be super honest though, the leather recliners get hot and uncomfortable before too long. I like the leather rockers at the Cinemark on the Plaza better. But the prime seats do have the reverbrators so there's that, I suppose.

I wish they'd switch from the "Unfold" trailer to the "Amaze" trailer, but it still gives me goosebumps every time.

Well over 300 speakers in that room.
 
Posted by Marcel Birgelen (Member # 6801) on 05-04-2014, 04:46 PM:
 
Hey Terry,

 -

Have another sip!

It's been out in large parts of the world since April 24th. The Friday evening show (on the 25th) I attended was nowhere near a sellout. For an average movie, the crowd was certainly not bad, but for a $200M production, you would expect more. It will probably not end up being a box office disaster, but neither a record breaker either.

quote: Mike Blakesley
The one I'm dreading this summer is the Transformers movie. I was about ready to pull the remaining hair out of my head after 2 weeks of listening to that last noisy crapfest.
Personally, I've never liked those big budget, overproduced, overly loud and "faux-epic" Michael Bay productions where everything is teal and orange. And the whole Transformers movie franchise has been one grotesque string of Michael Bay-ness...

After the last one, I really expected they would finally let the franchise cool down for a while.

A trilogy once was the golden rule of sequels. And at least for me personally, that still feels right. If you do have a franchise with strong characters, a compelling setting and still some stories to tell that matter, three movies just feel like the right amount... Everything extra is just milking it dry, just to grab that last remaining bundle of potential cash that's left in it.

It's unfortunate that potentially hurting or even killing the franchise, that many hold dear, in the process doesn't really matter to those who own the rights to it.

quote: Buck Wilson
I love it. I try to make a point to see every feature in Dolby Atmos in that house. It doesn't give me a headache like IMAX does.
The Atmos mix in this one is quite OK, but not the best I've heard until now. It has a few opportunities to bring the top speakers to good use though.

Digital IMAX gives me that apres-rock-concert feeling, but usually with a bad twist, because there was no beer*... So, it only leaves some-kind of pounding feeling in your head, but no alcohol in your veins to compensate...

* The local Digital IMAX venues actually sell beer, but I've never seen anybody drinking beer during an IMAX show...
 
Posted by Steven J Hart (Member # 2340) on 05-04-2014, 07:10 PM:
 
We had NO ONE show up for the Thursday night show. It was advertised on our website, radio ad and on our Facebook page (FB showed that over 200 people had seen the post promoting the Thursday show)

Friday through Sunday shows have also been very poorly attended. We don't always open movies on the break, but this one has been the worst opening we have done since I started at the theater in 1998.
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 05-04-2014, 07:31 PM:
 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
It will probably not end up being a box office disaster, but neither a record breaker either.
No its not going to be a box office disaster. Marcel, why does it have have to set a record? The original Spider-man set a opening weekend record because it was the first Spider-man movie, it was a new idea and it was the first real mainstream kids Marvel film (X-Men is more for adults). What is holding the movie back (and more importantly SONY back) is that SONY does not have any other Marvel characters to expand it on. $92 million this past weekend for North America is nothing to be ashamed of. Of course the 5th movie for SONY is not going to exceed the first one.

Marcel said earlier:

quote: Marcel Birgelen
All in all, I have the distinct feeling people are slowly getting tired of all those comic superhero movies. Especially Marvel is on their way of over-saturating the market...

All in all, your feelings are wrong. In less than 40 calendar days, both Captain America 2 and Amazing Spider-Man 2 have grossed a combined $1 billion+ at the world wide box office. In fact Captain America 2 far exceeded the take of the first one. You need to go back and look up Thor 2 from November, it too exceeded the take of the original Thor.

quote: Marcel Birgelen

After the last one, I really expected they would finally let the franchise cool down for a while.

Why in the world you want to do that? Transformers 3 grossed $1.1 billion dollars world wide, there is clearly a demand for it. The global take of the three is close to $2.8 billion and each sequel has out done the predecessor. Making movies and showing movies is about making money.

I will agree that the second and third installments sucked.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-04-2014, 09:22 PM:
 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
All in all, your feelings are wrong.
Nope, he's right. Here's an article from Boxoffice Mojo, which you won't agree with since you didn't post it, but whatever:

quote:

Franchise Fatigue Weighs Down 'Amazing Spider-Man 2'
by Ray Subers
May 4, 2014

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 scored one of the best debuts of the year, but wasn't nearly as amazing as past outings in the Spider-Man franchise.

Of course, the movie is doing significantly stronger business overseas. So far, it's earned $277 million, and has a good chance of matching its predecessor's $490 million total.

At the domestic box office, the sequel to the 2012 reboot opened to an estimated $92 million. That's a bit lower than Captain America: The Winter Soldier's $95 million debut last month. It is higher than Thor: The Dark World ($85.7 million), and is also above 2009 summer kick-off X-Men Origins: Wolverine ($85.1 million).

Compared to other outings in the Spider-Man series, though, this is a disappointing debut. It's tough to compare this to the first Amazing Spider-Man, which opened on a Tuesday ahead of the Fourth of July weekend. The best comparable titles are the first and third movie in Sam Raimi's original trilogy, which also debuted on the first weekend of May. Those opened to $114.8 million and $151.1 million, respectively, with much lower average ticket prices and no 3D premiums.

The Spider-Man character clearly remains very popular — if that weren't the case, it couldn't have possibly reached $90 million. It's abundantly clear, though, that this franchise has to some extent worn out its welcome with moviegoers.

To justify its existence so soon after the Raimi series, the 2012 reboot needed to be great; unfortunately, reactions were generally mixed. It was also the lowest-grossing entry yet at the domestic box office with $262 million (down 22 percent from the last entry).

To stop the bleeding, the second outing threw a ton of villains at Spider-Man, though that approach had its pros and cons (Electro looked silly, while Green Goblin felt redundant). Marketing wasn't quite able to overcome the "been there, done that" feeling that's accompanied this reboot series.

There was also an expectation that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 would be propped up by its Summer kick-off release date. Unfortunately, Captain America: The Winter Soldier seems to have stolen some of its thunder there. Reviews didn't help either, as it wound up being the worst-reviewed Spider-Man movie yet.

According to Sony, the audience was 61 percent male and 51 percent under the age of 25. That's younger than the typical audience for a superhero movie, and family attendance (33 percent) likely had something to do with this.

The long-term prospects at the domestic box office aren't great. The movie received a so-so "B+" CinemaScore, which suggests word-of-mouth will be only a bit better than the reviews. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 will likely fall off quickly in the coming weeks, and is essentially guaranteed to be the lowest-grossing entry yet in the franchise. Based on the pattern of other May openers, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 should finish with around $230 million.

Boxoffice Mojo

Of course there's no "requirement" that each movie should set records, but every one of these movies HOPES to set records. Our crowds here are definitely NOT amazing. We have yet to be even half full for a show, which is VERY unusual for a fanboy-type movie. The feeling is definitely "Another Spider-Man movie? Seriously?"
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 05-04-2014, 11:24 PM:
 
Mike, he is actually wrong.

quote: Mike Blakesley
Our crowds here are definitely NOT amazing. We have yet to be even half full for a show, which is VERY unusual for a fanboy-type movie. The feeling is definitely "Another Spider-Man movie? Seriously?
Perhaps your customers from your town are driving out of their way to see the movie in a premium large format such as Prime, BigD or AVX? How close is your town to a major multiplex?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-04-2014, 11:27 PM:
 
Cinema: Harkins Theatres Bricktown 16
Screen: Cine Capri
Format: 2D, Dolby Atmos - $8.00 per ticket. Yay.
Presentation Problems: None
Rating: 2 stars out of 4

My girlfriend, Cynthia and I watched a 4:15pm matinee show in downtown Oklahoma City. The crowd in the theater was pretty light. I didn't know if that had to do with lack of enthusiasm for yet another Marvel movie sequel or if everyone downtown was more interested in gathering at Chesapeake Arena to watch the Oklahoma City Thunder defeat the Memphis Grizzlies in Game 7.

This sequel just couldn't get its legs underneath it to generate any momentum. The on again and off again love story thing didn't get me involved. Paul Giamatti was wasted in what amounted to a cameo role. The Green Goblin portion seemed like a footnote, even though it had a big impact on the end of the movie. That actor seems like an also ran version of Leonardo DiCaprio. The very cliched story line with Max/Electro didn't do much for me apart from the visuals and sound effects (I call it cliche for the blatant stereotypical nerd cartoon character bullshit thing which shouldn't be in any TV show or movie anymore because it just isn't realistic at all).

The movie should have picked just one villain and stuck with just that storyline. They should have lightened up on all the love story crap, regardless of what the focus group dummies say about pulling in the female audience.

Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle

Andrew Garfield is a good actor. I really enjoyed his work in The Social Network. Honestly, I've had a real hard time buying him as Spiderman/Peter Parker. My girlfriend, Cynthia said right off the bat after the movie was finished that she preferred Tobey Maguire as Spiderman. I guess the thing I really didn't like about Garfield's performance was all this bullshit, hipster poseur nonsense he kept doing throughout the movie, pouting yet trying to look cool or ironic as he entered so many scenes. I wanted to slap him upside his head and tell him to cut out that pretentious shit. Act like a normal person for Pete's sake!

Overall, the movie just had this kind of feeling to it like it was a bunch of assembled clip art resembling a story rather than a real movie.

Presentation wise it was pretty good. I don't know if the projector in the Cine Capri is 2K or 4K. We didn't sit close enough to the screen to be able to tell for sure. My lady likes sitting up high in the farther back rows. At least this big screen had curtains and masking, and was common height, not idiotic common width.

I thought the Dolby Atmos mix was okay, but not all that astounding. The mix had a decent number of cues to let people know it was more than mere 5.1 or 7.1, but it was sort of odd in how it did it. I heard the most Atmos style action with Max/Electro's insane inner voice chants echoing all over the surround field. Parts of the music mix were moved into various points of the surround field as well. This mix was still somewhat subtle as far as immersive surround sound formats go.

I watched the end credits to see what would be listed in the sound format stuff. This was the first time I saw the Auro logo listed in movie end credits. The Dolby Atmos logo had the preferred single line treatment (making all the letters bigger). I don't recall seeing anything about IMAX though.
[Razz]
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-05-2014, 01:56 AM:
 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
Mike, he is actually wrong.
Wrong in what way, you dope? He is just quoting boxoffice figures.

quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
Perhaps your customers from your town are driving out of their way to see the movie in a premium large format such as Prime, BigD or AVX? How close is your town to a major multiplex?
I'm going to go right ahead and tell you that's not happening. The closest "PLF" to us is a Carmike that's 100 miles from here in Billings. The next closest would be 600 miles away in Denver.

I talk to our customers all the time and nobody has EVER told me they go "out of their way" to see movies at the "Big D" in Billings. If there was a big movie playing that we weren't playing, then they might...I know several teenagers who went to "Divergent" there, for example. But in general, people here are satisfied with the experience we provide.

If there was a mass exodus out of town to see a movie I would definitely hear about it, because in a small town you hear about that kind of stuff. Plus, I'm friends with a ton of our regular customers on Facebook.

I will say that I have heard from many people over the years who say that they have gone to movies at the Carmike, and they don't ever comment about the presentation; they just say the prices are ridiculous and the popcorn sucks. Not one person has ever said to me, "Yeah it's expensive but WOW the picture is SO BIG!"
 
Posted by Frank Cox (Member # 6258) on 05-05-2014, 02:09 AM:
 
Cleanliness is very important too. Just a couple of days ago I had an older lady tell me, "I can't believe how clean your theatre is." She said that she had gone to a theatre in one of the cities a few weeks ago and it was so filthy that she'll never go back.

Suits me.
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 05-05-2014, 02:39 AM:
 
I far prefer Andrew Garfield in the role. I think he rocks it. But then again, I have a huge crush on his character. [Razz]
 
Posted by Marcel Birgelen (Member # 6801) on 05-06-2014, 02:17 AM:
 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
All in all, your feelings are wrong. In less than 40 calendar days, both Captain America 2 and Amazing Spider-Man 2 have grossed a combined $1 billion+ at the world wide box office. In fact Captain America 2 far exceeded the take of the first one. You need to go back and look up Thor 2 from November, it too exceeded the take of the original Thor.
Nobody here claims the sky is falling (yet). But there is something called foresight. Foresight that some change might be necessary or at least desirable to avoid the former from eventually happening.

May I quote yourself from another discussion?

On 03-25-2014 you wrote:

quote:
I would say the lack of compelling films is keeping the 18-24 segment away from the theaters. If there is a movie that this segment wants to watch, then they will go to see it in a theater. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is a perfect example and so is the The Lego Movie. The recent RoboCop on the other hand simply did not connect with the 18-24 crowd. There is also usually way too much product in the marketplace as well and then there are all the reboots and sequels, Spider-Man has had five films and two reboots in 12 years, it is just way too much. And how may times can the studios possibly do a YA adaption, Mortal Instruments, Vampire Academy and Beautiful Creatures all tanked and Divergent did OK but not great. Again, way too much product, the teens can't possibly watch all of them.

Something also has to be said about studio expectations, not every movie can pull Avenger/Dark Knight Rises or Catching Fire type numbers, and then splitting all the third parts into A and B parts will take its toll. Shame on Lionsgate for splitting Mocking Jay into two parts, eventually people will just have enough of it.

You seem to make a point about the lack of creative content, all the sequels and reboots, being way too much and you specifically mention the Spider Man reboot... So, are you just being a dick here? Or is this a case of multiple personality disorder?

quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
Why in the world you want to do that? Transformers 3 grossed $1.1 billion dollars world wide, there is clearly a demand for it. The global take of the three is close to $2.8 billion and each sequel has out done the predecessor. Making movies and showing movies is about making money.
Maybe also because of this?

quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I will agree that the second and third installments sucked.
I might add my 2ct by claiming that the first installment, beyond the initial "WOW, look at all that stuff morphing and flying around"-factor also generally sucked. Also, I remain slightly astonished at the fact that something that started out as a franchise exclusively for kids ended up being a franchise targeted at almost exclusively young adults...

As a seasoned business consultant, you probably already know that any business should be making money, but if that's your only focus: good luck. Because, before making money, a business first has to add something of value to the process.

And beyond that, it shouldn't be just about quick cash grabs, those things wear thin pretty quick and might haunt you for eons to come. Most big studios have quite deep pockets, so there is no imminent need for constant broadside salvos of half-baked sequels. Maybe it doesn't matter to some short sighted studio execs, but especially Disney, who paid about USD 4.24 Billion just a few years ago for the whole Marvel franchise (of which Spider Man is probably the most important asset), there should definitely be more than just the focus on the short run.
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 05-06-2014, 08:36 PM:
 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
Nobody here claims the sky is falling
Well, I am glad we have cleared that up.
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 05-06-2014, 11:19 PM:
 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
May I quote yourself from another discussion?
No.
 
Posted by Marcel Birgelen (Member # 6801) on 05-07-2014, 04:16 AM:
 
Next time, I just won't ask for permission... OK? [Razz]
 
Posted by Terry Lynn-Stevens (Member # 7349) on 08-21-2014, 12:37 AM:
 
I had no interest in seeing either of the Amazing Spider-Man movies, but a few weeks ago I decided to finally give the first one a try, I was pleasantly surprised as the longer the movie went on, the more I liked it. I though Garfield was good and Stone was as well.

Part two came out on Redbox today, overall I really liked it. I thought it took big balls to kill off Stone's character, the effects were pretty cool and the 5.1 master audio sound mix was very good.

I understand the movie was filmed on 35mm, the bluray had a nice film grain look to it. The colors were really good.

My only real issue with the movie was with the Rhino at the end, the movie should of ended a little darker.

I am now a fan, I would look forward to seeing part 3, maybe in theaters when it is released.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 08-21-2014, 03:24 AM:
 
Watched it in 3-D on my home HDTV screen and it was fantastic. The disc was mastered in 4K and it shows with gorgeous color that was nice and bright,

I also saw the movie in 3-D in a theatre and I liked it better on my home screen,

-Claude
 
Posted by Jonathan Goeldner (Member # 4854) on 08-22-2014, 09:40 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I thought the Dolby Atmos mix was okay, but not all that astounding. The mix had a decent number of cues to let people know it was more than mere 5.1 or 7.1, but it was sort of odd in how it did it. I heard the most Atmos style action with Max/Electro's insane inner voice chants echoing all over the surround field. Parts of the music mix were moved into various points of the surround field as well. This mix was still somewhat subtle as far as immersive surround sound formats go.
even without a core mix of 7.1 (why the hell Sony is so resistant to releasing any of their tent pole releases as such is beyond me) I thought the Atmos really threw the sound around the auditorium quite well. I thought it was appropriately bombastic.

as to the film itself - I must admit I nodded off, so I'm curious to see what I missed. The Best Buy steelbook release is a beautiful edition.
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2