Anyway, I'd like to have your opinions regarding TV's mounted in the lobby for showing trailers. As a projectionist I personally don't care, but I can identify with the complaints from other staff members.
First, there are two TV's, one mounted above the box office, the other above the concession cash register. The sound is pumped through the lobby speakers as well as the unit speakers. This does make it difficult for our older employees to hear the customers in both locations during the showing of action trailers.
Second, many of the trailers are downright tastless. I never realized how stupid and sickening the trailers for "Animal" and "Dr. Dolittle II" are. Think about this: If NATO made the much-publicized statement of no R rated trailers on PG films, then shouldn't these TV's be out the window too. Granted, the above films are not R rated, but we're showing restricted previews on our particular tape in our lobby (things that make you go hmmmmm).
Lastly, and this is more personal for our folks, that money could have been spent on other items. Our ice machine is from 1986 and on it's last leg, the stand needs more counterspace, and I need about $1000 in parts upstairs. None of our customers really pay much attention to the TV's anyway, but we HAD TO HAVE 'EM.
Let me know about your views on this marketing tool. Do you like it, hate it, or are indifferent? Don't get me wrong, it has its good points and its bad points. I'm just saying lets spend the money where the money is needed.
I don't like it, however. You can't get the full effect from a trailer unless you're actually paying attention to it, and people in line or in the lobby are busy talking, looking around, etc. or the area is too noisy to hear the sound, which means the sound gets cranked up louder, making it noisier, etc.
To keep a "movie theme", how about some classic drive-in in-car speakers mounted on the posts used to hold the line ropes? That way, no one would be more than a few feet from the speakers, and the volume could be kept at a comfortable level.
------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

The impression a theatre makes on the audience begins while waiting in line and in the lobby. Do the best you can to maintain quality in the video and audio display. Use a direct video feed to the monitors, not RF. Use a distribution amp to maintain proper video signal levels if multiple monitors are used. If a VCR is used, maintain it to keep the heads clean and drop-out free, and tracking properly. Adjust the monitors to have matched color and tone scale, ESPECIALLY in video walls. Avoid showing copies-of-copies VHS tapes, as the quality is
.
IMHO, if theatres maintain
cinema as poorly as they maintain today's video displays, digital cinema has a tough time ahead.
------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
That said, if theatres are going to advertise in their lobbies, I as a moviegoer would much rather see trailers than anything else. Most of the newer theatres I've been in have done away with the expensive video walls and gone to 27 - 35" monitors, sometimes spread across the lobby or snack bar area. I think these make more sense, since they last longer, do not require the maintenance the video walls require, and are easier to see if you're standing close to them. I agree that the sound is usually either impossible to hear or just adds to the noise level of the theatre. Most trailers have so much visually in the way of action and titles that the sound could just be turned off without losing anything.
If the organizations (theatres, stores, etc.) using prerecorded video for this type of purpose cannot afford to have the repetitive material put on DVD and have the player hooked up to decent quality, properly-calibrated monitors using at least an S-Video cable, they don't need to be using video at all.
------------------
Evans A Criswell
Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Info Site
Price! Ian is actually the reason the monitors are so bad because it was his job to make sure they all matched. Since this is Ian
we are talking about, that is why one monitor will be green, another purple, etc...Just kidding, but I agree on the quality of the monitors. And I feel for the staff who must be driven insane by the constantly repeating trailers and ads. At least UA used LaserDisc players instead of VHS.
People went nuts over that set-up, and gathered around the projector and a little screen I made to watch the projector and trailers. 
and a very nice Altec tube amp it is by the way 
We have a [broken] Electrosonic video wall in Sebastopol that we ran our trailers on until it began to not work properly...
If I had any say in the issue i would also go with a vintage projector running 6000' reels of trailers as well. its the only way to go...
Aaron
In our chain, the cost of the equipment, upkeep and tapes comes directly out of the theatre's P&L. I can tell you, dropping $85+ for a 1/2 VHS tape at least once a month adds up. The company we use has begun to produce DVD's now, but they want damn near $200 for each one! When I asked why they were so much, I was told that the video compression/tranfer method was more time consuming and costly in DVD production. Whether or not it's true, I don't know. I'm no production/transfer major. What I do know is that were they reasonably priced, I would order them in a minute!
A GREAT advantage to DVD loops would be the fact that one could actually put MORE trailers from EACH distributor on the DVD which would increase overall exposure for each film! Of course, since this makes perfect sense to me, and you know, I'm just a lowly multi=plex manager, there's no way in hell it would ever work out that way...
If I had more insight, I'd be interested in setting up a little production/transfer/distribution company of my own... Especially if there are SUCKERS out there willing to pay damn near $200 bucks for a DVD!!!!
DOUG:
Mayeb you should contact me offline to discuss future potential ordering from your company??? Jasonwan@sccoast.net
We don't offer DVD yet for the reason you've mentioned - price. DVD's are still expensive and time consuming to produce in small quantities. If we had a circuit that needed several hundred copies every month, maybe it would be cost effective, but many of our customers are people with 1 - 4 theatres. They are usually looking for the cheapest option (we offer SVHS at a $10 surcharge, and SVHS machines are cheap now, but I still have no takers currently). I get requests for DVD, but we can't offer it for $19.95 like a studio that has made hundreds of thousands of copies of the same title. A one-off DVD is expensive and time consuming. The studios don't give us the trailers in a digitized form, which means we would have to digitize and compress each trailer we get (and we get them in different tape formats). Also, it would be difficult to just do one master DVD per month with every current trailer we have on it, and just give everyone a copy of that and let them do their own programming. For one thing, a lot of them would probably not know how to program the DVD player to play the selected titles (and nobody wants to advertise a film in their lobby that will be playing across the street at a competitor's theatre). Also, we get trailers from studios constantly, and try to use the most current version. A DVD master would go out of date quickly.
Digital mastering involving compression "authoring" is NOT inexpensive. DVDs are relatively inexpensive when the mastering costs can be prorated over a pressing of several thousand units, but the price climbs dramatically on smaller runs.
------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
Or you could get one of those nice Apple G4 DVD-R packages.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
1. The largest theater chain in the world has a very stiff upper lip (along with others) and would probably never try it.
2. Too many theaters have all they can do to get the movie on the screen right in the first attempt. I can see a disaster coming with an endless loop system.
When I had my setup in the lobby, I did not allow others to run my machine for two reasons:
1. It was my personal property.
2. Most importantly, I was always afraid that if I let someone else run it, they would forget to lock the upper and lower spindles to prevent the 6,000 foot reels from falling out and land on someone's head or foot.
Perhaps a platter might be the answer.
I do like the idea of a separate set-up in the booth where it is projecting into the lobby with a set of mirrors.
But, from my experience, people were more entertained by watching the projector being threaded, being started, and run. The patrons loved to ask questions on how it all works, and how we make it all come together.
We took great pride by interacting with the customer and adding a personal touch to their movie going experience.
It never failed us, as we believed that entertainment should start as soon as they step through the door and buy a ticket. 
idea.------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
When I lived in Cincinnati there was a USA theatre (now part of of Loews, I think) that had the booth for 2 of its auditoriums up 1/2 story and totally visible from the lobby. I always thought that was cool. People were fascinated to see how it all worked. Of course, the downside to that is that you can't swear when something or someone screws up. Guess that's what the glass walls are for.
The audience accepted tha fact I was off the screen, and all of the sudden they started laughing. Well, they heard a loud voice yelling F***! The walls never stopped that one.
I guess it must have been a classic.
These machines were the hardest to keep clean do to all the popcorn oil and cigarette smoke in the lobby. People used to sit on the steps to these platforms and get in your way trying to get up there. But, if it wasn't for the abbility to see these machines in action, I wouldn't be doing this today.
Loews did purchas USA cinema in 1988 and later sold off the Cincy and Louisville theaters to National Amusements in the early 90's. A lot of the old theaters are closed now. I think the Northgate, Kenwood Town Center, and Florence mall in northern Kentucky are the only ones open right now of the old ones.
It also had speakers along side of the screen, and the center channel was above the screen. I was not very impressed with it.
Paul