Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: World Cup soccer match screened live in London cinema

This is topic World Cup soccer match screened live in London cinema in forum Ground Level at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=000539

Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-10-2002, 02:29 AM:

Click here...

Posted by Bernard Tonks (Member # 809) on 06-11-2002, 05:51 AM:

I see that some UCI multiplex cinemas including the Empire Leicester Square are screening daily World Cup soccer. Anyone know what type of digital projection is used ?

Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 06-18-2002, 04:44 AM:

Leo you can tell that the yanks don't watch football by the number of responces to this, even thought there team is doing really well and are in the quater finals!
Cya Sat.
Darren

Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-18-2002, 07:57 AM:

Yup... Claudio Reyna (USA captain) was on the radio this morning saying that he was a tad phugged off that hardly any of his compatriots were interested in the World Cup.

Bernard: The Odeon Leicester Square have done DLP presentations in the past (e.g. Toy Story 2), so maybe they just plumbed a TV tuner into that projector.

I wonder what the TV licensing implication is? If they showed MurdochVision (or other satellite or cable) coverage they must surely have had to pay a pretty hefty sum to screen the match to an audience of nearly 2,000. But if they showed free-to-air coverage then presumably a normal TV licence is all they needed. I don't think there's any condition on a licence which limits the number of people who can watch at any one time; it just licenses the named address to receive terrestrial TV.

Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 06-18-2002, 08:50 AM:

Darren a lot of Yanks watch football but not many watch Soccer. It is gaining in popularity with the younger set. They now have organized teams for children 5 years old and up that is being run much like the Little League does with Baseball and Pop Warner with Football.

I think in another 10 years as the sport becomes more popular with our younger generation you will see interest increasing.

However unless you have grown up watching this it seems very slow moving and with scores like 2 - 0 and 1 - 0 the game lacks a degree of excitement.

One man's opinion.

Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 06-18-2002, 09:04 AM:

Bob Maar said: "However unless you have grown up watching this it seems very slow moving and with scores like 2 - 0 and 1 - 0 the game lacks a degree of excitement."

In baseball, many really enjoy "pitchers' duels" more than games with scores in the teens.

Rochester is a real "soccer town":

http://rhinossoccer.com/
http://www.mlsnet.com/

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 06-18-2002, 09:27 AM:

John,

I love a game where there is a "Pitcher's Dual" and the game ends up 1-0. This can create it's own excitement. Getting a walk or an error can put people on base and excitement builds. There is focused action on a baseball game. There are many senarios.

However, with the way the soccer games are played there doen't seem
very exciting. As I stated it's only my opinion. I know from the reaction in Austrailia, New Zeland,Europe and England there are millions of fans and I wish them well. I'm just not one of them.

Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 06-18-2002, 01:13 PM:

Bob well I reckon your lot pinched the name Football from the rest of the world and wanted to be different and came up with the name Soccer, I reckon it should be Football and American Football for your national game. Just a thought.

Darren
Have fun!

Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 06-18-2002, 01:36 PM:

Darren,

I like the way you think.

From this day forward it's American Football.

P.S. Now I just have to convince the other 200 + Million.

Posted by David Favel (Member # 1125) on 06-18-2002, 05:10 PM:

Korn concert screened in U.K. cinemas
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/new_media/newsid_2049000/2049887.stm

Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 06-18-2002, 05:57 PM:

Yes, the young'uns are taking to football (soccer) in the US now.
The women's victory over China in the Olympics (even if the win was by a penalty kick) encouraged girls to take to the game enmasse.

I find soccer a sport of continuous motion, like a choreographed ballet, especially when playbacks in slo-mo are shown. In the NY metro area, it is shown daily on th UHF channels, mostly narrated in Spanish or Italian. The patter is continuous, and when there is a goal, the announcer yells GGOOOOOOOOOAAAALLLL in a cry that seems never-ending. It's very easy to follow, even without understanding the finer points. For example, I can't even name the positions the
players hold nor the plays, nor do I understand some of the rituals.
Example: When two players tear off their jerseys, jump up and down, and embrace each other's hairy sweating torsos. Are they the captain and the goalie celebrating a victory, or competing captains showing
good sportsmanship? Or swapping jerseys for souvenirs? Two women
on the US olympic team did this, to the criticism of some prudes,
but all the TV cameras showed it over and over as a significant ritual, which I see in every game on TV.

I never tune in purposely, but when it appears while channel-hopping, it keeps me riveted for a while, even though I have no preferences
as to teams. It's much more active and readily affordable than American Football, with the latter's arcane rules and terminology, and interminable interruptions and delays. As for cricket, I don't think anyone born in the USA could ever see the point of it. Must be limited to geographical genetics. Maybe the Icelandic records will someday explain.