This is topic Any thoughts about "hybrid" theaters? in forum Ground Level at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=002454

Posted by Celine Negrete (Member # 5531) on 12-12-2010, 01:56 PM:
 
Curious as to what any of you might think about the idea of 'hybrid' theaters? As our film buyer describes them, they are the best of both worlds...they usually have a traditional 'multiplex' area where they show current commercial Hollywood films (including kids movies), with a traditional concessions area.

But, they also have another area with more screens that tends to be limited to 21 and over, often includes a bar/restaurant, and more plush/comfy theaters. Some of these screens might show arthouse films, but also commercial films that adults might prefer to see in an theater without teenagers/kids.

A couple of examples:
http://www.monacopicturesusa.com/
http://www.cinetopiatheaters.com/

From what I have heard, both of the examples above are doing very well. They have been described as the 'wave of the future'. The idea being you can appeal to everyone (in theory)...families, teens, adults looking for a nice night out, arthouse crowds, etc. And with everything from popcorn and soda, to tapas and wine, along with Harry Potter and Winter's Bone you have all your bases covered.

Thoughts? Has anyone been to a theater like this? I have read a lot of reviews on Yelp for both these examples. They are both highly-rated, but if there are complaints they are mostly about the execution of the concept, not complaints about the concept itself.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-12-2010, 02:24 PM:
 
quote: Celine Negrete
But, they also have another area with more screens that tends to be limited to 21 and over, often includes a bar/restaurant, and more plush/comfy theaters. Some of these screens might show arthouse films, but also commercial films that adults might prefer to see in an theater without teenagers/kids
I have seen some of these theatres and the jury is still out IMO. They work in certain markets for a reason

Cineplex Odeon has these theatres and they are called "VIP" theatres. Cineplex Odeon Varsity is doing well and so is the Cineplex Odeon VIP Oakville.

The problem with these theatres are this:

1. You limited who will see the movie with an under 21 age limit (which makes point #3)
2. You limited who will pay $17.75 a pop for this theatre.
3. With VIP, you now need a "non" VIP theatre/screen of the same film for those who do not want to pay extra for this service.
4. You only really do well during the weekend evenings for these theatres.

The benefits to VIP are if you are in a saturated market and offer:

1. Reserved seating (HUGE importance)
2. Private adult only
3. More upscale.

People can talk alchohol or tapas all they want, this is nothing new. Cineplex Canada Square and Carlton offered this service way back in the mid 90s.

With the above being said, Cineplex Odeon has done something very, very strategic in certain markets. Cineplex/Encore/AMC all have a combined 51 screen from three theatres in a combined 20km distance in my area.

Cineplex has 20 screen in two cinemas (10 each) on either side of the AMC 24 and the Encore 5 (Independent). At the two Cineplex Theatres you can reserve seats at the SilverCity Ultra AVX or the Cineplex VIP. You can't do that at Encore Oakville or AMC.

Reserved seating ensure those "hardcore" fans will come to your theatre.

quote: Celine Negrete
'wave of the future'.
The wave of the future is not VIP or over 21 screenings. It will be "uber" cinmeas like Ultra AVX/ETX/Empire Extra which allow the "hardcore" fans to get what they want on opening nights for movies like Twilight/Harry Potter/Tron etc. Most new multiplexes will need to offer one or two of these screen to get the opening night crowds.

Just to put things in perspective, guess which theatre in my over saturated market did not open Twilight Eclipse, Harry Potter 7, and Tangled....All of those movies went to the Silvercity VIP and Ultra AVX.

If you are in a overly saturated market, the biggest thing you can offer to the public, is free reserved seating...sadly, the boys at Encore do not get this and are not drawing the crazy opening days fans.

Cineplex VIP

For an FYI, Cineplex Odeon Square One 10 (now Empire) had VIP in four THX theatres in a exclusive upper level which was an EPIC fail. It now sits empty, and the theatre only play arts and low key movies.

Also, 3D VIP 19+ is $20.25 a ticket at Oakville VIP
 
Posted by Celine Negrete (Member # 5531) on 12-12-2010, 02:30 PM:
 
Sorry about the double-post...not sure how to delete one of them, or maybe someone else has to do that?

But...what if you are NOT in an over-saturated market at all? What if you are in a smaller town with only one independent theatre (with say maybe 9 screens, over 3 locations)? And they do not offer reserved seating, beer/wine, food, etc. Just the traditional theater experience.

What about then?
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-12-2010, 02:34 PM:
 
quote: Celine Negrete


But...what if you are NOT in an over-saturated market at all? What if you are in a smaller town with only one independent theatre (with say maybe 9 screens, over 3 locations)? And they do not offer reserved seating, beer/wine, food, etc. Just the traditional theater experience.

Sadly, I don't think a reserve theatre or over 21 will work. Nor would 9 screens.

Think about it this way?

Why haven't the larger chains thought of this for your market.

Celine, how large is the population?
 
Posted by Celine Negrete (Member # 5531) on 12-12-2010, 03:01 PM:
 
Within city limits, a little over 15,000. The county itself is 98,000. Someone would have to travel a minimum of 50 minutes to find any kind of theatre offering any of the described 'amenities'.

I understand what you are saying about the larger chains. I think we are a 'borderline' community (looking at the demographics from the outside). But, we are continuing to grow (with a lot of the growth coming from transplants from the Bay Area (San Francisco, etc), coming with a certain desire to continue having great food, shops, films, art, etc. that they have been used to. And we have always been considered an 'arts' community, it has always been a strong element in our community. But, no, a complex that charges $17/ticket would not work here. That is not what I am asking about. Those are prices associated with larger or more urban markets. I understand that too.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-12-2010, 03:03 PM:
 
quote: Celine Negrete
Within city limits, a little over 15,000.
Does the town have cinema already?
 
Posted by Celine Negrete (Member # 5531) on 12-12-2010, 03:11 PM:
 
The nine screens, but at three separate locations, I mentioned above. All owned by the same family and traditional 'multiplex' feel.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-12-2010, 03:32 PM:
 
quote: Celine Negrete
The nine screens, but at three separate locations, I mentioned above. All owned by the same family and traditional 'multiplex' feel.
If all 9 screens are all owned by the same family and if they play all the films currently in wide release, then you have no chance.

If you have a small cinema and think you will get a blockbuster over the owner with 9 screens, then you are mistaken. Also, if those cinemas have 3D (which I am pretty sure will) then you WILL NOT get a 2D print of the movie or a 3D digital theatre. The owner of the 9 screens will have an advantage of being able to support all the bad films released by the distributors that have the good ones too.

So, yes a small independent art house type theatre will work as a small niche. Not really sure a "hybrid" has much of a chance. There is cleary demand for movies in your area based on population and the fact there are 9 screens in three different locations.

But you will have to run very similar to the Princess Twin in Waterloo.

I would love to hear what others have to say.
 
Posted by Jake Spell (Member # 5294) on 12-12-2010, 06:07 PM:
 
As TOm said, a Hybrib prob will not work. However, a local theater The Terrace Theater that shows primarily art house independent movies with the occasional large budget film does quite well with the older 21+ crowd largely due to the films that they show and getting an exclusive in the city. Another big strong suit is that they have a large selection of beer and wine as well as TONS of different candies and just little niche items that other places don't offer.
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-12-2010, 06:17 PM:
 
It is all a matter of booking
often in a first run situation the studios will require the ability to move prints to different size screens to accomodate there upcoming product
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 12-12-2010, 06:39 PM:
 
I don't know anything about hybrid theaters, but there is a place near me that is a Dent Repair/Steak House, so I suppose anything is possible. I'd like to see a Redbox installed inside a movie theater lobby.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 12-12-2010, 08:27 PM:
 
Seen it! Back in the late 80s the Wilshire Village Twin cinema in Burleson, TX converted half of their lobby to a video rental store.
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 12-12-2010, 08:56 PM:
 
OK OK OK... how about this one: Hybrid movie theater/parking lot.
 
Posted by Jake Spell (Member # 5294) on 12-12-2010, 09:13 PM:
 
Cinebarre did that too. Showed a movie once a month in the parking lot on an inflatable screen. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Jesse Skeen (Member # 586) on 12-12-2010, 09:14 PM:
 
Does a drive-in count?
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 12-12-2010, 09:27 PM:
 
OK OK OK... I'll come up with something nobody has ever thought of... a hybrid movie theater/restaurant.
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 12-12-2010, 09:48 PM:
 
Check out Arclight cinemas -- the flagship one annexed the Cinerama Dome on Sunset Blvd -- it's nice but I found it overpriced -- there are at least 2 others now but I'm not sure if the one in Pasadena has the restaurant because it's really a refurbished AMC.

Arclight offers reserved seating and 21+ screenings.

And then there's another theatre called "The Bridge" (name might've changed recently) which IIRC had a bar in it.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 12-13-2010, 12:29 AM:
 
Great Falls, MT used to have a drive-in/indoor theatre. They would often play the same print at the drive-in and the indoor via an interlock. The screens were facing each other. The snackbar/lobby was in the middle and had a walk-up counter outside for the drive-in, with the booth on top of the snackbar building. I have no idea if this place is still around today (probably not since GF is now a Carmike town) but our old booker used to book for them and told me it did quite well.

About that over-21 restriction -- I think that could catch on like wildfire but not as a fulltime thing -- maybe as a certain showtime -- say, every Thursday night is "no kids" night. I think you'd have a hard time playing anything from, say, Disney if you tried to do that every night. Arthouse fare might be another story.
 
Posted by Ian Parfrey (Member # 5122) on 12-13-2010, 02:07 AM:
 
The danger IMHO is that there is a great possibilty of trying so hard to cater for both sides of the movie-going experience that the resultant is nothing but an incoherant amalgam of styles and atmospheres that neither patron is happy with.

As an example, in a multi-screen setup that has, say 5 screens for mainstream and 5 screens for arthouse, that the arthouse crowd feel 'out-of-place' amongst the main-streamers and vice versa.

By this I mean that Arthouse moviegoers have a vastly differing raison d'etre for going to a particular movie- usually terminating with an intimate chat/discussion over a coffee/wine with fellow arthousers. They wish to have a focussed experience whereas the main-streamers prefer a more care-free time.

Arthousers like to feel they 'own' a location and if they get that feeling in your theatre then you will have a very loyal patronage - but if they feel they get the sensation/atmosphere of 'Arthouse-in-a-Multiplex' then they won't find any connection with your theatre and just won't bother.

Now, the 'Over 21' and 'Premium' services may help to bridge that gap between the art crowd and the Mainstreamers as long as the 'Premium' screens are treated as a separate entity from the normal screens. There is still a danger of overly complicating the location eventually making it uneconomic to run.

Personally, if it was MY $$$ I would think hard about which demographic I would want to target and concentrate on that, and for me that would be Arthouse because of the loyalty mentioned previously. If you nurture that market they will follow you to the ends of the earth and back whereas the mainstreamers are an incredibly fickle bunch looking out for the next big thing.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-13-2010, 03:18 AM:
 
quote:
in a multi-screen setup that has, say 5 screens for mainstream and 5 screens for arthouse, that the arthouse crowd feel 'out-of-place' amongst the main-streamers and vice versa.

I would want to target and concentrate on that, and for me that would be Arthouse because of the loyalty mentioned previously. If you nurture that market they will follow you to the ends of the earth and back whereas the mainstreamers are an incredibly fickle bunch looking out for the next big thing.

You makes some really good points and it was interesting to read your response.

The thing that is paramount is the theatre cannot be to big. No more than 4 screens IMO. If your art-house theatre turns out to be big hit, it won't take long for the comepetition to get in on the action. And you will have a real tough time operating your cinema.

For example, there is a theatre in GTA that plays Bollywood films only. At one time, the cinema chain had the entire GTA market to themselves, well Cineplex Odeon eventually got in on the action and regularly play Bollywood films at their SilverCity location. AMC also added Bollywood films to their theatres.

Another example is Carlton Cinemas. Once the art/foreign centre of Toronto, it now has been reopened but no longer gets first run at the independents. Dragon Tatto, Secret in their Eyes, Black Swan (which will go wide), Never Let Me Go etc never opened at the Carlton. They eventually played at the Carlton weeks/months later.

All of them went to Cineplex because of their enormous market power.

The best theatre that I would model is after the Princess Twin in downtown Waterloo. Stadium seating, two theatres, attached streetside cafe, art house films and just 5 years old. This is a model for a small town art-theatre and has a loyal following.

It should be noted that they are playing Hollywood stuff this week, but Never Let Me Go, Dragon Tattoo, Tamara Drewe, Tall Dark Stranger have all passed through already. Black Swan opens this Friday.
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 12-13-2010, 07:42 AM:
 
Arclight is easily one of the more successful multiplexes in Hollywood and they have 20 screens.

They have a restaurant and (at least) two bars plus a gift shop and art gallery spaces.
 
Posted by Tony Bandiera Jr (Member # 2365) on 12-13-2010, 01:14 PM:
 
quote: Manny Knowles
And then there's another theatre called "The Bridge" (name might've changed recently) which IIRC had a bar in it.


Manny you are correct, it changed names it is now "Rave" Cinemas. I have never been there (yet) so I don't know if it still has a bar.

It is off the 405 fwy. and Howard Hughes Parkway by Culver City.
 
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 12-13-2010, 01:57 PM:
 
The Arclight has 14 screens + the dome for 15.
 
Posted by Mike Croaro (Member # 3123) on 12-13-2010, 06:57 PM:
 
Hi Folks:

Ian speaks of me in his post above.

I try as best as I can to see arthouse films in theatres that SPECIALIZE in this type of product. I do not want to go to a forwign film with kids running everywhere and the video arcade blaring. The few times I have gone to the local cattleplex to see these types of films I have had a difficult time getting "in the mood".

What about a building that is divided into to separate theatres with a hallway between them so employees can secretely move from one theatre to the other depending on where they are needed?

Mike
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 12-13-2010, 11:07 PM:
 
Thanks Mike -- it's been a while since I went there --still an impressive screen count considering they're doing restaurant and all that. And they were always doing brisk business whenever I went.

Frankly, I didn't think the Arclight service was worth the high price of admission. I usually went because a friend insisted. They claim to have the best sound but I heard LOUD first order reflections in every theatre. It's almost like they designed them for that.

But, never mind me -- everyone else seems to LOVE the Arclight. I guess they fall into believing that if they charge that much, then it MUST be worth it. Shrug.

Tony, I went to the Bridge (aka Cinema de Luxe and now "Rave") a couple of times -- seemed too subdued for me. The lobby was kinda cave-like -- dim dim dim -- and neon designs on the walls. Not to my taste. There wasn't any sense of excitement in the air. Kind-of like being in a mall after all the stores have closed and the Muzak now seems to be playing just a little too loud...

I don't drink so I never patronized the bar.

Funny story: my friend who still lives there said they changed the name to "Rage" [Eek!]

(That's a gay bar in West Hollywood, for those who don't know.)
 
Posted by Cameron Glendinning (Member # 3516) on 12-14-2010, 09:07 PM:
 
Over the years "arthouse" has lost its meaning compared to its past of repetory and foreign subtitled past, I tend to think of it as a grown ups cinema now, where as multiplexs tend to be for teens and familys. Teens simply don't want to be where the adults are, and lets face it the opposite is also true.

Celene you know what your doing and I think you have come to terms with how qurky your audience is. Depending on your budget I would tend to think of only one major decision, that would be to stadium or not to stadium.

With stadium design you will have much more foyer and resturant/bar space left of you total floor space compared with your current flat floor style of cinema, but the flat floor and a high screen would work exceptionally well with recliner seats, like found in many peoples home theatres nowdays. (Which are pretty cheap when imported by the container from China).

Bars work well with events, Coffee machines and resturants need staff, grown up audiences like all of the above.

Best wishes.

Oh in reference to the other thread, Digital is the future.
 
Posted by Jake Spell (Member # 5294) on 12-14-2010, 11:35 PM:
 
As far as stadium or not. The older crowd around here really hates stadium stating but love the sloped floor.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-15-2010, 01:09 AM:
 
to Celine.

Here is a hybrid theatre for you.

A look at AMC Dine In Cinema
 
Posted by Cameron Glendinning (Member # 3516) on 12-15-2010, 02:09 AM:
 
Tom's interesting artical regarding AMC points out the obvious to me, eat a meal before or after the film, its distracting during the movie, especially with your style of serious programming (I am a friend of the Magic on facebook [Smile] ).

I do however like the idea of this style of luxury cinema but only with the same mindless first release family films that I currently watch and enjoy at the drive in! I also think its great for dates.
 
Posted by Ky Boyd (Member # 23) on 12-15-2010, 03:32 AM:
 
I'm late to the party here but here are a couple of thoughts/observations:

Arclight Pasadena was not a former AMC. It was the Pacific Paseo 14 owned/operated by Pacific Theatres which owns Arclight. The former AMC in Pasadena is now the Gold Class Cinemas in Pasadena.

Mike - I don't remember the Twilite Cinema Centre ever interlocking the drive-in and the main house. There was a projectionist apartment between the two booths. Through the mid-80's both the drive-in and the main house were 2 projector 6,000 ft reel change-over houses. Century projectors if I recall correctly. The Twilite was the first theatre in Great Falls to get Dolby Stereo - for the Bee Gees version of Srgt Peppers (yikes!)

In San Francisco, Sundance Cinemas Kabuki is probably a hybrid as it combines food, bars, art house and mainstream adult appeal commercial fare. Ditto for the Sundance Cinemas in Madison, WI and the Landmark in LA.
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 12-15-2010, 11:43 AM:
 
Why would you do a dinner theater that charges the same price for tickets as everyone else plus a surcharge just for ordering inside? That's just stupid.

The dinner theaters around here charge a little bit less than others for tickets because they're hoping that the guys would buy more food. If they added a $10-15 surcharge just for getting in, they'd end up getting nobody at all.
 
Posted by Celine Negrete (Member # 5531) on 12-15-2010, 01:36 PM:
 
Thanks for all the interesting responses (and some good links to check out).

To clarify as to my original post, the idea of hybrid theatre as I was referring to (and the examples I gave), was not so much about the combining of movies with food (or more specifically meals in the auditorium). I personally don't care for that idea. It seems like there are some places that have learned to do it well (Alamo Drafthouse?), but by and large there are a lot of complaints out there (on Yelp, etc), about it not being done well, messy, too expensive, frustrating...

Anyhow, the 'hybrid' I was asking about had more to do with the idea of combining commercial Hollywood films (mostly family, teen-oriented titles) with traditional concessions fare, under the same roof as more adult and arthouse-oriented titles in a 21-over area with beer/wine/finger food "concessions" area.

So, one is covering all bases, so to speak. I understand the idea of wanting a particular environment for art product (I run an arthouse), but I also think that ultimately what our audience wants is to see particular films in an auditorium that is quiet, respectful, clean and with great presentation. They wouldn't care if they had to simply walk past a certain 'wing' of a building where it was more of a traditional multiplex environment to enter "their" environment.

So, it is really not about serving meals in a theatre that I am asking about (beer, wine, yes). I don't think that would appeal to the market I am speaking of. But, there could be onsite bar with bar-food (non-traditional) so that a bite to eat before or after the film would be easy and convenient.

Anyhow, thanks again for interesting thoughts and info!
 
Posted by Preston Drum (Member # 5903) on 12-15-2010, 02:03 PM:
 
check out: http://www.epicentretheaters.com/

We are located in uptown Charlotte, NC. Which has been hit by the 2008 crash pretty hard (currently 9.5% unemployment). We do well with the hybrid concept with an emphasis on luxury. We are a movie theatre, restaurant and night club under one roof- occasionally we show symptoms of an identity crisis. We have popcorn, candy, booze and gourmet food. After 7pm we are 21 and up , this restriction doesn’t affect us too much because we steer away from children’s films- plus most families with children just rent.
I think a lot of these concepts are useful for the survival of the cinema. Flexibility is very important; you have to put yourself in a position where you can adapt. Customers mostly just want to get out of the house and have fun or relax. Just provide a space that keeps this in mind. As it stands I don’t think the Megaplex model is sustainable.
 
Posted by Mike Frese (Member # 4361) on 12-15-2010, 08:06 PM:
 
There are a couple of theaters in my state that run a hyrbid of sorts that I believe makes some sense. They run the traditional type art-house movies and mix-in the more widely released movies that adults would be more inclined to like. Movies like Inception, The Town, & Burlesque. But they pretty much always have at least 50% of what they show art-house. The two theaters first mentioned in this thread do not seem to be much art-house to me as I saw 90%+ widely released movies.
 
Posted by David Kilderry (Member # 142) on 12-16-2010, 05:23 AM:
 
Food and movies have always gone together. The upscale (Arthouse) locations have always done better with full service restaurants/cafes (either in-house or nearby) whereas the mainstream films have always catered more to the popcorn brigade.

The right mix of food/movies will always depend on the location.
 
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 12-17-2010, 12:40 AM:
 
quote: David Kilderry

The right mix of food/movies will always depend on the location.

Do you mean food in theatre or outside surrounding the cinema?
 
Posted by Michael Barry (Member # 237) on 12-17-2010, 08:39 AM:
 
Celine, the description you provide in your latest post reminds me most of a place some have mentioned already in this thread: the Hollywood Arclight.

I saw a movie there about a year ago ('Whatever Works'), I had a meal at the restaurant prior to the movie, I bought a popcorn/drink before entering the cinema, and the overall experience I had definitely meshes with what you described.

Have you been there? It might be worth checking out!

A few things come to mind: the ticket price was higher than other theatres ($13.50 matinee, $16 after 6pm), but I still find that to be good value. From my perspective, I don't mind paying a few extra dollars for a ticket when I know the theatre is doing everything in its power to put on a great screening.

It was a unique experience! After entering the cinema and the doors were shut, a staff member stood at the front of the theatre and made an announcement that went something like, 'Ladies and Gentlemen, thank you for attending this afternoon's presentation of 'Whatever Works'. Now that the doors are shut, for your uninterrupted viewing pleasure no-one else will be permitted to enter the auditorium. There will be a staff member monitoring the presentation throughout to ensure steady projection, sharp focus and clear sound. For the comfort of your fellow patrons, please refrain from speaking throughout the movie. This, too, will be monitored and patrons who disregard this request will be asked to leave. We hope you enjoy Woody Allen's new movie, 'Whatever Works'. Thank you for coming to Arclight Hollywood and we look forward to seeing you again soon.'

I know that this kind of presentation isn't for everyone and that some may not wish to pay the extra. However, if those are the conditions under which one chooses to view a movie, then that's what the Arclight Hollywood offers.

The seats were the most comfortable I've ever had the pleasure of sitting in, and indeed the picture was bright, steady and sharp. Sightlines were perfect. The sound was mono being a Woody Allen film, but it was very easy to hear all the dialogue. You can't ask for more than that.

They do have a lockout policy, so they absolutely will not sell more tickets to a movie after a certain cutoff time. This helps them to enforce their policy of not allowing entry to an auditorium once the doors are shut and their announcement is being made.

I also recall that if you notify your waiter at the restaurant that you have tickets to a movie (I think they actually prompt you with this question), they will remind you that your screening is imminent when the time comes.

The staff were all extremely professional and beyond helpful. For example, when I was buying popcorn (I'm a vegan) I asked if it was possible to have popcorn with no butter. It was a casual question and I was prepared to make another selection if the staff weren't sure or what have you, but not only were they sure the popcorn could be served vegan-friendly, they brought out the oil container packaging to prove it to me! Wow - now that's helpful! The counter area, floors, seats, aisles, etc were beyond clean - immaculate, spotless.

Some of the other movies playing at the time included 'Away We Go', '500 Days Of Summer', 'Moon' and 'I Love You Beth Cooper'. I saw a 4:30pm session which was during the week, but there were still quite a few people seeing the movie. After the movie, I noticed that the foyer contained people of all ages, including teens and people in their early 20's. Everyone seemed to be in a good mood, smiling, and well-behaved. I didn't see anyone rowdy there. The place has a wonderful, friendly vibe to it. I think it's a great place to go and hang out.

I should add that I don't live in LA - I'm from Sydney, Australia but if I lived there, I would happily drive 40-50 miles each way to go to the Arclight, even if I had other cinemas closer to where I lived, and even if those cinemas were cheaper. Again, I don't mind paying extra when I get something that I think is awesome. Not everyone is like me, of course, but I'd say that I'm the kind of guy that the Arclight had in mind when they came up with their business plan and overall philosophy.

I hope that helps!

PS. They also show 35MM studio prints of movies from the AFI top 100 each week, and if I lived in LA I would definitely attend those too.
 
Posted by Martin Brooks (Member # 1269) on 01-17-2011, 10:26 AM:
 
quote: Celine Negrete
Anyhow, the 'hybrid' I was asking about had more to do with the idea of combining commercial Hollywood films (mostly family, teen-oriented titles) with traditional concessions fare, under the same roof as more adult and arthouse-oriented titles in a 21-over area with beer/wine/finger food "concessions" area.
The first issue is what's the relationship between arthouse-oriented titles and alcohol, better food and "adults only"? If you're in this for the long term, you want to develop an audience for better films and you won't be developing that audience if you bar them from the arthouse theatres.

Back in the late 1960s, when I was 18 and got involved in my first long-term relationship, I used to go to see all of Truffaut's films as well as many other arthouse films in a local theater in Brooklyn (which later became a porn house before being converted to a catering hall). Obviously, we live in a different media world today, but I still think there's a case to be made for not limiting the age of people in the arthouse theatres. If you check sites like blu-ray.com, you'll find tremendous interest in arthouse films (check out the 25,000 postings on the Criterion thread). The question is how you pull people out of their homes to view those films.

In addition, I think there's a market for a better theatre experience for commercial films as well.

However, what is more important to that experience? Is it being isolated from younger (or less well off) people? Is the ability to eat slightly better food or to drink alcohol? Or is it the ultimate sound and projection experience in a nicer appointed theater? For me, it would be the latter not the former.

However, in a town of your size, I'm not sure you can make those distinctions. Instead, maybe you create an area of the lobby that partitions off a cafe where you serve alcohol and somewhat better food. Those with such interest can congregate there. In fact, maybe that area should have its own external entrance so customers can partake even when they're not planning to attend a movie.
 
Posted by Dan Biegner (Member # 6026) on 02-21-2011, 03:54 PM:
 
I think another part of it too is especially if you're a smaller sized theater, it's important to have an identity. I used to work at a theater that would show mainstream blockbusters 70% of the time, but then would show any small release film if it seemed like it were doing well. So something like the Little Miss Sunshines, or Kids Are All Right. The "indie" flicks, if you want to stretch it. And that was fine, but it made it confusing for a lot of people and we never really developed a solid clientele. We had a few loyal customers, but we didn't have an identity as a theater (complicated by the first run v. second run dilemma we seemed to have).

We were a really small theater (2 screens), and there is a market for those cozy little local theaters. But because we never really established an identity, every film we brought in was a guessing game. Never really knew what to expect for an audience.

As has been mentioned though, it all sort of depends on your area. I happen to like going to theaters that have a bar (theater I currently work at just started selling beer and wine, and it sells well. We're more an arthouse though, so it makes more sense.)

I actually really, really liked The Bridge. The Arclight was cool too. Loved those LA theaters (hard to be the Cinefamily Silent Theater though, in my book.)
 
Posted by Ron Funderburg (Member # 4561) on 03-23-2011, 01:40 PM:
 
Art House, Retro film, and the like never work in small markets to few people interested in the product. I don't know if a theater serving food would work. It might be worth a try but I would suspect that you wound need a highly reduced menu Monday though Thursday.

According to the film companies the determination on a theater getting product is miles between you and the other locations. Usually you should be at least 2.5 miles as the bird flies now with that said good luck it may be the rule but they tend to break their own rules a lot.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 03-23-2011, 03:08 PM:
 
Isn't that the truth. I still have an old Boxoffice magazine from the early 80s where some Disney suit said they would NEVER release their classic movies on home video, because they were made to be seen in the theatre and Disney was adamant that they should only be seen that way.

quote: Ron Funderburg
I don't know if a theater serving food would work.
There is a little theatre near here (yup, smaller than my own!) which serves pizza and beer from the restaurant next door which is owned by the same person. They also have reclaimed couches instead of traditional seats in part of the auditorium. I guess they do quite well for their size. (Town of about 900 people)
 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 03-23-2011, 03:18 PM:
 
I've seen a checks cashed/liquor store in Indianapolis. Perhaps they should add a cinema too?

AJG
 
Posted by Ron Funderburg (Member # 4561) on 03-23-2011, 06:22 PM:
 
Mike I didn't say it wouldn't work and what you describe isn't what I was talking about. As I said I don't know if it would work then went on to say that suspect that through the week you would need a reduced menu. The set up speak of have a reduced menu all the time brought in from another place so it isn't quite the same as being just for the theater.

Not trying to be argumentative but I'm saying the all in one might not work. If it was planned well and could track how much to have ready it could work. Add the restaurant next door and buy through them might be the best.

But on the other hand it gives me an idea. If I only had someone to work with on. Oh no I work for other people now not me.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 03-23-2011, 07:34 PM:
 
quote: Ron Funderburg

Not trying to be argumentative

Ron, I wasn't arguing, just conversing.
 
Posted by Ron Funderburg (Member # 4561) on 03-26-2011, 12:39 PM:
 
I wasn't arguing either it just gave me some inspiration but it is something I wont act on, probable wouldn't act on. I actually wanted to thank you it inspired my imagination. That is a good thing, Right?
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2