This is topic AMC Buys Carmike in forum Ground Level at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=002970

Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-03-2016, 06:21 PM:
 
Did not see that coming:

quote:
AMC Entertainment has acquired Carmike Cinemas, in a $1.1 billion deal that makes the exhibitor the largest theater chain in the United States and in the world.

Regal Entertainment, with 7,361 screens, was previously the largest domestic distributor.

The move comes following a record year for ticket sales, with the domestic market passing $11 billion in revenue for the first time in history. Industry-wide, however, attendance remains relatively flat, and the theater business faces challenges from the growing popularity of streaming services and video games, as well as a rise in quality television programming.

AMC has moved aggressively to counter those challenges by installing recliners, expanding its menu options, and offering alcohol service at certain locations. The company also underwent a management shift in recent months. In December, the company tapped Adam Aron, former CEO of Starwood Hotels & Resorts, to take over from Gerry Lopez, who left AMC last summer to run hotel chain Extended Stay America.

Headquartered in Columbus, Ga., Carmike was the fourth largest movie theater company in the country, with 2,917 screens in 41 states.


Variety
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 03-03-2016, 06:51 PM:
 
I was always wondering on how Carmike stayed in business with all of the ups and downs they had in the past.

True though .. quite the shocker.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-03-2016, 07:09 PM:
 
Well, they did go bankrupt a few times.

It's going to be interesting here as Carmike owns the newer multiplex and AMC has done a horrible job running the RAVE they bought just to get it's foot into Alabama. They turned it into a discount dump.
Assuming the purchase is allowed, AMC will be all over the South, so I'm betting the Rave will be closed down soon after the transition.
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 03-03-2016, 07:11 PM:
 
I did not see this coming either. Though perhaps we should have? With AMC reclinering the crap out of old plexes everywhere, it doesn't seem to be a bad idea. I just hope this puts an end to Carmike's "buy you snacks from the ticket taker" concept.

I can't wait to see what they have to divest. Though truly now it will be just like three friends trading baseball cards. "Hey Regal, we'll give you this Carmike'd Rave in Alabama for your old UA in Mississippi."
 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 03-03-2016, 07:57 PM:
 
I wonder if this means any Carmikes are gonna get Sony'd?
 
Posted by Steve Wilson (Member # 2411) on 03-03-2016, 08:24 PM:
 
This is the kind of thing the US Government should put a stop too and may very well do! The is too much of a Monopoly to allow to happen, although they have allowed in the airlines and we see where their high prices are due to the lack of competition.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-03-2016, 08:42 PM:
 
Throw in AMC owned by the Chinese and you have a potential campaign issue [Wink]
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 03-03-2016, 09:16 PM:
 
So let's see if I understand this- - (which I dont) :

Here in San Francisco, AMC used to run & own the "Kabuki 8 Cinemas"
a popular theater in the Japantown district.

Robert Redford's "Sundance Cinemas" acquired the "Kabuki 8" in
2006 when the government forced AMC to sell it in an anti-trust
settlement agreement which then allowed AMC to acquire Lowes.

Last November, Carmike bought the Sundance Cinema chain, which
includes The Kabuki.

So now, if AMC acquires Carmike, I guess that means they will
own the Kabuki again which they were forced to sell in the first place?

Wow- Whatta convoluted corporate conundrum !
 
Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 03-03-2016, 10:16 PM:
 
I don't think there will be that much to divest. Carmike largely operates in smaller markets no one else would bother with. That was their whole business model for years.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-03-2016, 10:44 PM:
 
I don't think this is good news for my town.

AMC recently bought Starplex Cinemas, a regional chain who was the latest owner of Lawton's 1st run 12-plex theater in Central Mall. Dickinson originally built it 15 years ago, squeezing it into a cramped, single story space. The screens were tiny and not so great.

Carmike recently opened its new 13-plex here in town. I was hoping once AMC took over the mall theater it might try to compete directly with Carmike by closing down the mall theater and building a bigger, better multiplex downtown. Now that AMC is going to have both of the 1st run sites in Lawton they'll have no incentive to improve anything.
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 03-04-2016, 12:22 AM:
 
With this news, I am having a very difficult time containing my apathy.
 
Posted by Marcel Birgelen (Member # 6801) on 03-04-2016, 12:40 AM:
 
Wanda Group (the owner of AMC) also recently bought Legendary Entertainment, known for e.g. the latest Batman trilogy.

They seem to be very determined in getting a stronghold in international entertainment markets.

Welcome your future Chinese overlords, first they got your jobs, now they're rapidly going after the rest too. Hey, let's borrow some more from them while they're at it...
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 03-04-2016, 12:49 AM:
 
Holy actual fuck..... This is literal insanity.

Wonder what Regal will buy to get back on top....
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 03-04-2016, 05:16 AM:
 
quote: Buck Wilson
Wonder what Regal will buy to get back on top....
AMC? [Wink]
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-04-2016, 08:01 AM:
 
quote: Sam Graham
I don't think there will be that much to divest. Carmike largely operates in smaller markets no one else would bother with. That was their whole business model for years.

You forgot the other half of their business model. Every few years, buy up other chains, over expand, go bankrupt. Repeat as necessary,

Let's see if they infect AMC.
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 03-04-2016, 08:26 AM:
 
Well, for the record, Carmike only went bankrupt once.

But yeah, this is quite the shocker, though I suppose once they kicked out the Patrick's it was only a matter of time. Once the ego factor of being the biggest was removed, strategic decisions simply boiled down to what makes the most financial (for the stockholders) sense.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-04-2016, 09:17 AM:
 
I think this could be a lousy development for customers, not just in markets that are monopolized or nearly monopolized by AMC. Big movie theater chains are only going to make improvements if they're put under pressure via competition to do so.

What's going to happen with all those Carmike "Big D" theaters or the pair of MuviXL screens they maintained from their Muvico theater acquisitions? AMC has lots of IMAX-branded theater screens, but the few Prime and ETX premium screens they had are being converted to "Dolby Cinema @ AMC Prime."

Here locally I still don't see what AMC could do with the 12-plex we have at Central Mall other than run it as is -which is probably what they'll do now; I just don't know if they'll keep the lower prices Starplex had. Most of the auditoriums already have far too few seats. There's not enough space for recliners, food tables or any of the other stuff AMC is incorporating into many of their locations. They would have to build a new location for that. Instead, maybe they'll just stick a bunch of recliners into the new Carmike theater here.
 
Posted by Jonathan Goeldner (Member # 4854) on 03-04-2016, 09:39 AM:
 
^ guess those select DTS-X equipped auditoriums are going to bite the dust.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-04-2016, 02:59 PM:
 
It's not like Carmike installed very many of them. I have a sneaking suspicion the "Big D" theaters will just be re-labeled as standard auditoriums. AMC only seems interested in having lots of Lie-MAX theaters and some Dolby Cinema screens.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-04-2016, 03:16 PM:
 
FWIW: Here's the official press release. Strange, not a word about AMC being a Chinese owned company.
Joint Release

quote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
LARGEST CHAIN OF MOVIE THEATRES IN THE U.S. AND THE WORLD
Combines Highly Complementary Theatre Circuits to Expand Platform for AMC’s Guest Experience and Strategic Growth Initiatives
AMC THEATRES TO ACQUIRE CARMIKE CINEMAS, CREATING
Leawood, Kansas and Columbus, Georgia – March 3, 2016 — AMC Theatres (AMC
Entertainment Holdings, Inc.) (NYSE: AMC) (“AMC”) and Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (NASDAQ:
announced today they have entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which AMC will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Carmike for $30.00 per share in cash. The transaction is valued at approximately $1.1 billion, including the assumption of Carmike net indebtedness. The purchase price per screen is approximately $376,000, and the per share purchase price represents an approximate 19.47% premium to Carmike’s March 3, 2016 closing stock price.
The Combined Company After Closing the Transaction
AMC is one of the nation’s premier entertainment companies with 5,426 screens and the most productive theatres in the country’s top markets. Carmike, America’s hometown theatre circuit, has 2,954 screens, primarily located in mid-size, non-urban communities. Together AMC and Carmike would have well over 600 theatre locations in 45 states across the country, including the District of Columbia. The transaction is expected to provide significant growth for AMC and will allow it to bring its innovative amenities and best-in-class customer experience to enhance the movie-going experience for more customers in more areas.
Key Benefits of the Transaction
The transaction is expected to result in free cash flow per share accretion, exclusive of one-time transaction-related charges, in 2017 and beyond, and is expected to produce annual cost synergies of approximately $35 million. Other key benefits of the transaction include:
 Diversifying AMC’s footprint by adding theatres with complementary geographic and guest demographic profiles that strengthen the combined company’s admissions growth potential with limited geographic overlap;
CKEC) (“Carmike”)
 Expanding AMC’s proven and successful guest experience strategies to millions of new guests in complementary markets;
 Reducing related General and Administrative expenses by combining back-of-the-house functions such as accounting, finance and technology. The result is a more efficient and effective competitor through greater scale, scope and expertise.
 The maintenance of AMC’s quarterly dividend;
 The maintenance of AMC’s balance sheet flexibility and attractive leverage profile; and
 AMC’s receiving substantial additional value in NCM LLC, a subsidiary of National CineMedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: NCMI).
will be headquartered in Leawood, Kansas. Adam Aron will serve as Chief Executive
Officer and President, and Craig Ramsey will serve as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer;
Commenting on the transaction, AMC Chief Executive Officer and President, Adam Aron said,
“This is a compelling transaction that brings together two great companies with complementary
strengths to create substantial value for our guests and shareholders. Through this transaction
we expect to unlock synergies, sufficient we believe to make this transaction accretive in 2017.
AMC also gets to extend the reach of our innovative, guest-experience strategies to further
transform the movie-going experience for millions of new guests. We also look forward to
welcoming so many talented Carmike employees to the AMC team.”
“Our combination with AMC is a transformative milestone for Carmike and one that provides significant value to Carmike shareholders,” stated David Passman, Carmike President and Chief Executive Officer. “By joining with AMC, we are bringing together two highly complementary theatre footprints and a shared commitment to service and innovation, positioning the combined company to deliver an even more compelling movie-going experience in many more locations across the country. I am proud of the Carmike employees whose dedication and hard work have made this combination and its many benefits possible. We look forward to working together with the AMC team to complete the transaction and to ensure a seamless transition.”
Approvals and Timing
The transaction was approved by both Boards of Directors of AMC and Carmike, respectively.
The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of 2016, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval and approval by Carmike’s shareholders.
Aron added, “By broadening AMC’s geographic and demographic base for delivering our
groundbreaking guest experience innovations in comfort and convenience -- such as plush
power-recliners, enhanced food and beverage, premium sight and sound, greater guest
engagement and targeted programming -- AMC is poised to deliver the best possible movie
experience to more movie-goers than ever before.”
Additional Details
The transaction, which has fully committed financing in place, will be funded through a
combination of existing liquidity, including cash on hand, and incremental debt. The debt
financing commitment is being provided by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citi”).
Citi is serving as exclusive financial advisor to AMC and Husch Blackwell LLP is serving as
The combined company
AMC’s lead legal advisor. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is serving as exclusive financial advisor and provided a fairness opinion to Carmike. King & Spalding LLP is acting as legal counsel to Carmike.
Conference Call
AMC will discuss the transaction in greater detail on a conference call and webcast on Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:30 a.m. CT/8:30 a.m. ET. To listen to the conference call via the internet, please visit the investor relations section of the AMC website at www.amctheatres.com for a link to the webcast. Investors and interested parties should go to the website at least 15 minutes prior to the call to register, and/or download and install any necessary audio software. To access the call from the U.S., dial (855) 327-6837. From international locations, the conference call can be accessed at (778) 327-3988. An archive of the webcast will be available at www.investor.amctheatres.com for a limited time after the call.
About AMC Theatres
About Carmike Cinemas
.
AMC (NYSE: AMC) is the guest experience leader with 387 locations and 5,426 screens located
primarily in the United States. AMC has propelled innovation in the theatrical exhibition industry
and continues today by delivering more comfort and convenience, enhanced food & beverage,
greater engagement and loyalty, premium sight & sound, and targeted programming. AMC
operates the most productive theatres in the country’s top markets, including No. 1 market
share in the top three markets (NY, LA, Chicago) www.amctheatres.com
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. is a U.S. leader in digital cinema, 3-D cinema deployments and alternative programming and is one of the nation's largest motion picture exhibitors. Carmike has 276 theatres with 2,954 screens in 41 states. The circuit includes 55 premium large format (PLF) auditoriums featuring state-of-the-art technology and luxurious seating, including 32 "BigDs," 21 IMAX auditoriums and two MuviXL screens. As "America's Hometown Theatre Chain" Carmike's primary focus is mid-sized communities. Visit www.carmike.com for more information.
Website Information
This press release, along with other news about AMC, is available at www.amctheatres.com. We routinely post information that may be important to investors in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.investor.amctheatres.com. We use this website as a means of disclosing material, non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD, and we encourage investors to consult that section of our website regularly for important information about AMC. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this document. Investors interested in automatically receiving news and information when posted to our website can also visit www.investor.amctheatres.com to sign up for E-mail Alerts.
Important Additional Information Regarding the Merger Will Be Filed With The SEC
This press release may be deemed to be solicitation material in respect of the proposed merger. In connection with the proposed merger, Carmike will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and furnish to its stockholders a proxy statement and other relevant documents. BEFORE MAKING ANY VOTING DECISION, CARMIKE’S STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED WITH THE SEC IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED MERGER OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THE PROXY STATEMENT BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED MERGER. Carmike’s stockholders will be able to obtain a free copy of the proxy statement, when available, and other relevant documents filed by Carmike with the
SEC at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, Carmike’s stockholders may obtain a free copy of the proxy statement, when available, and other relevant documents from Carmike’s website at http://www.carmikeinvestors.com/ or by contacting Carmike’s investor relations representatives by telephone at (212) 835-8500 or via email at ckec@jcir.com.
Participants in the Solicitation
Carmike and its officers and directors may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Carmike’s stockholders with respect to the proposed merger. Information about Carmike’s officers and directors and their ownership of Carmike common stock is set forth in the proxy statement for Carmike’s most recent annual meeting of stockholders, which was filed with the SEC on April 17, 2015. Investors and security holders may obtain more detailed information regarding the direct and indirect interests of the participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed merger by reading the proxy statements regarding the proposed merger, which will be filed by Carmike with the SEC.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of words such as “forecast,” “plan,” “estimate,” “will,”
“would,” “project,” “maintain,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” “may,”
“should,” “believe,” “continue,” and other similar expressions that predict or indicate future
events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters. Similarly, statements made
herein and elsewhere regarding the pending acquisition of Carmike are also forward-looking
statements, including statements regarding the anticipated closing date of the acquisition, the
source and structure of financing, management’s statements about effect of the acquisition on
AMC’s future business, operations and financial performance and AMC’s ability to successfully
integrate Carmike into its operations. These forward-looking statements are based on
information available at the time the statements are made and/or managements’ good faith
belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks, trends, uncertainties
and other facts that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those
expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. These risks, trends, uncertainties
and facts include, but are not limited to, risks related to: the parties’ ability to satisfy closing
conditions in the anticipated time frame or at all; obtaining regulatory approval, including the risk
that any approval may be on terms, or subject to conditions, that are not anticipated; obtaining
the Carmike stockholders’ approval; the possibility that the acquisition does not close, including
in circumstances in which AMC would be obligated to pay Carmike a termination fee or other
damages or expenses; related to financing the transaction, including AMC’s ability to finance the
transaction on acceptable terms; responses of activist stockholders to the transaction; AMC’s
ability to realize expected benefits and synergies from the acquisition; AMC’s effective
implementation, and customer acceptance, of its two brand strategy; disruption from the
proposed transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers,
employees or suppliers; the diversion of management time on transaction-related issues; the
negative effects of this announcement or the consummation of the proposed acquisition on the
market price of AMC’s common stock; unexpected costs, charges or expenses relating to the
acquisition; unknown liabilities; litigation and/or regulatory actions related to the proposed
transaction; AMC’s significant indebtedness, including the indebtedness incurred to acquire
Carmike; AMC’s ability to utilize net operating loss carry-forwards to reduce future tax liability;
continued effectiveness of AMC’s strategic initiatives; the impact of governmental regulation,
including anti-trust investigations concerning potentially anticompetitive conduct, including film
clearances and participation in certain joint ventures; and other business effects, including the
effects of industry, market, economic, political or regulatory conditions, future exchange or
interest rates, changes in tax laws, regulations, rates and policies; and risks, trends,
uncertainties and other facts discussed in the reports AMC and Carmike have filed with the
SEC. Should one or more of these risks, trends, uncertainties or facts materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated
or anticipated by the forward-looking statements contained herein. Accordingly, you are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date they are made. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of
future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or
by, which such performance or results will be achieved. For a detailed discussion of risks,
trends and uncertainties facing AMC and Carmike, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in
AMC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2015, the section entitled
“Risk Factors” in Carmike’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29,
2016, and the risks, trends and uncertainties identified in their other public filings. Neither AMC
nor Carmike intends, and undertakes no duty, to update any information contained herein to
reflect future events or circumstances, except as required by applicable law.
AMC CONTACTS
INVESTOR RELATIONS:
John Merriwether, 866-248-3872
InvestorRelations@amctheatres.com
MEDIA CONTACTS:
Ryan Noonan, 913-213-2183
rnoonan@amctheatres.com
CARMIKE CONTACTS
INVESTOR RELATIONS:
Norberto Aja or Jennifer Neuman JCIR
212-835-8500 or ckec@jcir.com
Richard B. Hare
Chief Financial Officer 706-576-3416
MEDIA CONTACTS:
Barrett Golden / Mahmoud Siddig
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher 212-355-4449
###


 
Posted by Terry Monohan (Member # 8285) on 03-06-2016, 08:52 AM:
 
Regal will buy Cinemark/Century to get back on top! Will the new Carmike Theatres be called AMC or Carmike or both?
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 03-06-2016, 12:35 PM:
 
Maybe something cute like AMCarmike.

I wish they would just get rid of the Carmike name. I never did like the sound of that name for some reason. Not that AMC is any better.
 
Posted by James Westbrook (Member # 3690) on 03-06-2016, 01:43 PM:
 
Back in their histories the two chains went by different names. Carmike was Martin Theatres and AMC was Durwood.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-06-2016, 02:55 PM:
 
Personally, I object to them returning to the Martin chain. [evil]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-06-2016, 05:31 PM:
 
quote: Terry Monohan
Regal will buy Cinemark/Century to get back on top! Will the new Carmike Theatres be called AMC or Carmike or both?
My guess is the Carmike brand will vanish, but not immediately.

There's things like lighted signs and other branding stuff that costs money to replace. AMC may maintain the Carmike brand on a bunch of existing theaters for the time being and then either add "AMC" to it or replace the existing signage as they can get to it. The Loews Theater chain was absorbed into AMC, but there are still former Loews locations bearing Loews signage.

Probably the first thing that will go bye bye is Carmike's web site with all the existing Carmike locations getting redirected into AMC's site. The Starplex buy-out was final in December and it took only a couple months for that site to get redirected into AMC.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 03-06-2016, 09:30 PM:
 
Some of these buildings will need another new sign. And also a lot of spackle to hide the old holes from the last 12 signs.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-06-2016, 09:38 PM:
 
The main problem is whether AMC will want to spend the money swapping out signs in the first place. Installing new signs isn't too big a deal. In some cases the building fascia will have to be patched and painted to cover up old holes from flush-mount channel letters or other odd signs. Channel letters mounted on metal raceways are much easier; just one penetration thru the wall for power.

AMC only has three letters in its brand, which makes for significantly lower sign costs. It's a lot easier and less costly making an "AMC" sign than one of those Carmike Cinemas script channel letter signs.
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 03-07-2016, 09:58 AM:
 
'Carmike' was actually a combination of Carl Patrick, Sr.'s (who gained control of Martin before it was Carmike) sons' names: Carl and Michael. The Patrick's had a habit of working their name into things having to do with the theaters; an early version of the software that ran the back office computers was called 'Wynn Systems'; Michael Patrick's sons' name is Wynn Patrick. When I worked there my paychecks always came from 'Eastwynn Theatres', which I'm guessing was a wholly owned sub within the Carmike corporate structure.

Gotta love nepotism.
 
Posted by Jason McMillan (Member # 5542) on 03-07-2016, 10:23 AM:
 
Carmike keeps the single screen Pines Theatre in Silsbee, TX operational. Built in 1948, it has the wonderful charm of an old small-town theatre. I keep wondering how AMC is either going to ruin it, or just out-right close it.

For reference: http://cinematreasures.org/theaters/13465
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 03-07-2016, 10:38 AM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I wish they would just get rid of the Carmike name. I never did like the sound of that name for some reason. Not that AMC is any better.
It is ironic that AMC originally stood for American Multi-Cinema and it is now owned by the Chinese.

Either name is better that the old "General Cinema" name. Not exactly indicative of something special!
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 03-07-2016, 01:00 PM:
 
quote: Dustin Mitchell
The Patrick's had a habit of working their name into things having to do with the theaters; an early version of the software that ran the back office computers was called 'Wynn Systems'; Michael Patrick's sons' name is Wynn Patrick.
And there are some locations called "Wynnsong" which is a name I dislike even more than Carmike.

I never thought about the cost of making those Carmike script signs - I'll bet that is costly. Surprising they didn't go the KFC, BK, DQ, etc. route and rebrand themselves as "CM."
 
Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 03-07-2016, 05:23 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The main problem is whether AMC will want to spend the money swapping out signs in the first place.
I don't know why they wouldn't. I can't think of a single case where they haven't done so previously.
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 03-07-2016, 05:43 PM:
 
'Keeping the Carmike brand' is code for 'It's going to take a while to change shit over.' When Carmike bought GKC 10 years ago the former GKC theaters continued to sell Pepsi products, even though Carmike is exclusive with Coke; GKC had a contract with Pepsi, and because of the way the purchase was structured Carmike was obligated to honor that contract. Even though both Carmike and AMC serve Pepsi products, I imagine there are other things that will take a while before AMC can start doing it 'there way'; for example, I wonder if Carmike is/was under contract to sell certain varieties of candy. There's a lot involved in a combination like this, the first and most massive task will be migrating the back office/POS systems Carmike uses onto AMC's system. Then you have to deal with gift cards/discount tickets....

All kinds of considerations before you even begin swapping out building signage.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-07-2016, 11:25 PM:
 
The reaction here locally: "what the hell is going to happen with my 2016 Popcorn Bucket?"

I can't speak for AMC, but I wouldn't be surprised if they told the popcorn bucket customers they could use those things as a portable toilet.
 
Posted by Evans A Criswell (Member # 381) on 03-08-2016, 12:14 AM:
 
I just encountered this news yesterday and was surprised. Here in Huntsville, AL, we have the 1998 Carmike 10 which has been a discount theatre for years, and the converted-to-Carmike Rave Valley Bend 18. We still have the Regal (originally Cobb) Hollywood 18, the Monaco 14 at Bridge Street, and most interestingly, the Madison Square 12 that has had its seating recently converted to recliners and is experiencing a resurgence in popularity. AMC is going to have the top-of-the-line Rave-built Valley Bend 18 and the old discount Carmike 10 assuming they take both over and don't do something like sell off or close the Carmike 10. Decatur, AL for a while has only had one theatre, the Carmike 12 at the mall. Decatur went from 20 screens to 16 in 2000, then to 12 a couple years ago, and they'll be totally AMC after this change. I had some friends in Atlanta that seemed to like AMC the best there, but that was in 2006.
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 03-08-2016, 06:41 AM:
 
quote: Sam Graham
I don't know why they wouldn't. I can't think of a single case where they haven't done so previously.
I think they'll change signage eventually too, but wouldn't be too surprised if they didn't. I don't think they've ever made a purchase this big....
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 03-08-2016, 07:50 AM:
 
There are still a bunch of theatres here that say "Loews" on them, even though the interior signs and posters say AMC.
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 03-08-2016, 08:25 AM:
 
In my previous post I meant to say 'even though both Carmike and AMC sell Pepsi.' Oops.

Bobby and others: I would be shocked if AMC suddenly stopped honoring deals such as the Annual Popcorn bucket. Will they well new ones for 2017? Probably not. They might even stop selling 2016 buckets, but I'm sure those who already bought buckets will still be able to use them through the end of the year.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-08-2016, 09:34 AM:
 
As the Press Release says it will probably take until the end of 2016 to complete the deal, I suspect Popcorn Buckets are the least of their concerns.
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 03-08-2016, 10:20 AM:
 
One of the things that I noticed at one of the local theaters
here when the Sundance/Carmike merge (or whatever) took
effect last fall is that there some 'thinning out' of the staff
within the first 30 days. I don't know what criteria was used
to make the downsizing decisions, it did seem that walking
papers were given to long term employees who were making
more than minimum wage. And, in at least one case I'm aware
of, an open position was filled a few weeks later with someone
who was willing to take less money.

Having once worked for several big companies, this isn't
an unusual situation.

I remember at one company, after an upcoming merger
was announced, we seemed to be constantly running low on
copy paper. At first, I thought the old company had just cut
back on purchasing before the new company took over. But
I eventually realized that the paper shortage was caused
because as soon as the merge was announced, just about
everybody in the office was Xeroxing copies of their resumes
to send out. (Obviously, this was before electronic resumes
became the norm) In the end we ALL got fired, and had to
re-apply and get re-interviewed to get our own jobs back,
& the new staff was only about 85% of what it originally
was, which meant that even though we got our original
salaries back, we technically were making less money since
we were being asked to do more work for the same pay.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-08-2016, 05:46 PM:
 
And now the other shoe drops:
quote:
Carmike’s Largest Shareholder Says It Will Oppose Sale To AMC Entertainment
by David Lieberman
March 8, 2016 11:34am

The $30 a share price that Carmike Cinemas accepted to sell itself to AMC Entertainment, is “hideous” — and about $10 too low — the No. 4 exhibition chain’s top shareholder, Mittleman Bros., told the company in a letter today.

The investment firm, which owns 7.1% of Carmike’s shares, says that it plans to oppose the deal.

Mittleman also will “reach out to other large Carmike shareholders beginning today and over the next few weeks to encourage them to vote against this merger based on its current terms,” Managing Partner Chris Mittleman says in a letter to Carmike CEO David Passman and Chairman Roland Smith. “We expect most will be in substantial agreement with our view” that the chain sold for too little.

Mittleman says he would accept “no less” than $40 a share in cash, or $35 in AMC stock, for Carmike. The current deal was made “with no apparent auction process, and no go-shop provision.”

The company’s share price jumped about 20% after the deal with AMC was announced late Thursday. Today Carmike is up about 1% to $30.10 — which suggests that investors believe a higher price is coming. AMC is down 0.6%.

Mittleman’s letter notes that Carmike’s sale price, at about $1.1 billion including debt, equals about eight times its cash flow (measured as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA). After factoring in potential cost savings, the multiple drops to 6.5 times EBITDA — and with other adjustments could be as low as five times.

By contrast, Mittleman says, London-based Vue Entertainment sold in 2013 to 8.5 times EBITDA. And the $2.75 billion that China’s Wanda Group agreed in 2012 to pay for AMC was 9.1 times EBITDA.

“If this had been a stock swap, then an initially lower valuation might have been tolerable, given that the upside potential in the combined entity would be shared by both parties,” the letter says. “But here, AMC is unwilling to share the immense benefits this deal will bring to their shareholders, and Carmike failed to extract a fair price in relinquishing that upside potential.”

This morning B. Riley & Co analyst Eric Wold downgraded Carmike shares to “neutral” saying that while a higher bid for the company is a “possibility,” it might not materialize and there’s “uncertainty” about whether the Justice Department will approve the deal.

AMC “is getting a steal given the attractiveness of the [Carmike] assets and long-term value they can drive into AMC’s circuit,” he says.


Deadline.com
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-10-2016, 04:10 PM:
 
An article about the Carmine CEO and closing down the corporation. A good 15min video interview at the bottom.
Ledger Enquirer
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 03-10-2016, 05:14 PM:
 
quote:
AMC President and CEO Adam Aron has said his company plans to keep the Carmike Cinemas brand and low-cost operating model for now.

 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 06-30-2016, 11:26 AM:
 
Uh-Oh
Variety
quote:
Facing blowback from investors, Carmike Cinemas postponed a shareholder vote Thursday on the theater chain’s potential $1.1 billion sale to AMC Entertainment. Some analysts and stock watchers expect that AMC could sweeten its deal, but AMC chief Adam Aron hit back at suggestions that his company’s proposal undervalues Carmike. He hinted that AMC might walk away from the table.

“AMC Entertainment remains committed to our proposed transaction to acquire Carmike Cinemas,” he said ” The rationale to acquire Carmike continues to be valid, namely to create a larger system of theaters nationwide.”

Aron added: “Even so, this transaction is now at considerable risk.”

Aron went on to decry “loose price talk” in the market, saying the critics of the deal failed to account for tax implications from the pact and other transaction costs in pushing for a higher price. One of the leading opponents of the pact is Driehaus Capital Management and Mittleman Brothers, which together control nearly 20% of Carmike’s votes.

A union with Carmike would make AMC the biggest theater chain in the world, bypassing Regal and giving it well over 600 theater locations in 45 states across the country, including the District of Columbia. AMC was itself acquired in 2012 by China’s Dalian Wanda Group for $2.6 billion.

Carmike investors will reconvene on July 15.


 
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 07-13-2016, 12:06 AM:
 
AMC pays $1.2 billion for Europe's Odeon & UCI Cinemas; tells Carmike shareholders that if they want the offer upped by $250 million they can eat a bag of dicks

quote:

Wanda’s AMC to Buy Odeon in Global Push, Leaving Carmike Waiting

AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.’s $1.2 billion purchase of Odeon & UCI Cinemas Group extends Chinese billionaire Wang Jianlin’s movie-theater empire into Europe while leaving open the fate of its deal for the No. 4 U.S. chain Carmike Cinemas Inc.

“We have not even made a decision yet whether we will increase at all,” Adam Aron, chief executive officer of AMC Entertainment, said Tuesday in a telephone interview. “But what we are going to do is get in dialogue with Carmike and see if the deal can be salvaged.”

The acquisition of London-based Odeon & UCI widens the lead of Wang’s Dalian Wanda Group Co. as the world’s No. 1 operator of movie screens while easing pressure on the company’s U.S.-based unit, AMC, to complete its deal for Carmike. Even with Odeon & UCI in the fold, Aron said he has the financing to buy Carmike and is willing to negotiate. He just won’t pay what some Carmike investors have demanded.

“There is only one thing that I am certain of in life, they are not going to get $40 a share from AMC,” Aron said in the interview. The deal gets “marginal very quickly” for Leawood, Kansas-based AMC above the $30 threshold, he said earlier. “The Carmike shareholders are going to have to want this transaction to occur.”

Shares of Carmike, based in Columbus, Georgia, rose as high as $30.79 following Aron’s comments, before closing up 2.2 percent to $30.39 in New York. AMC surged 7.3 percent to $29.80, the biggest single-day advance since Feb. 16.

Carmike’s two largest shareholders -- Mittleman Brothers LLC and Driehaus Capital Management LLC -- oppose AMC’s $30-a-share bid. Including recent purchases, they own about 20 percent of the company, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Two shareholder advisory firms, Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., have also come out against the transaction, saying the $1.1 billion deal undervalues Carmike.

Chris Mittleman, chief investment officer for Mittleman Brothers, Carmike’s second-largest shareholder, said the terms of the Odeon deal confirm that AMC’s offer undervalues Carmike. On that basis, the company is worth $47.69 a share, he said in an e-mail.

Anything less than $40 a share would be a “travesty of fairness,” Mittleman said.

Flawed Assumptions

Aron said Mittleman’s valuation assumptions are flawed.

Carmike holders are slated to vote July 15 on AMC’s $30-a-share buyout offer after an earlier vote was adjourned. Aron said Tuesday that AMC is prepared to walk away and may not look for another takeover target.

“I don’t know that we are rushing out to find some replacement for Carmike because there is a void,” Aron said. “I actually think the void for Carmike has been filled by Odeon UCI.”

AMC is the No. 2 chain in the U.S. behind Regal Entertainment Group. A purchase of Carmike would push the company to No. 1 and increase revenue by about 27 percent. Odeon & UCI would add about 40 percent. AMC has 5,380 screens in 385 locations, while Carmike has 2,938 screens in 273 theaters and Odeon & UCI operates 242 theaters with 2,236 screens.

With the Odeon & UCI deal, Piper Jaffray Cos. analyst Stan Meyers sees more risk of the Carmike agreement falling apart, according to a note Tuesday. Based on Aron’s comments during a conference call, AMC may be willing to increase its bid and potentially throw in some equity, though not what Carmike stakeholders have sought, he wrote.

The purchase of Odeon, which operates screens from the U.K. to Spain and Germany, marks the first billion-dollar sale of a U.K. asset since the Brexit vote. A sale lets Guy Hands’s Terra Firma Capital Partners Ltd. exit from the business after a number of unsuccessful divestment attempts that date back to 2011.

The June 23 Brexit vote has caused the pound to drop against the U.S. dollar, making U.K. assets cheaper for overseas investors. Wanda, in a statement, cited Brexit for the breakthrough in its three-year negotiations toward a deal.

“While there is increased uncertainty and increased risk, it is also true that the pound fell to a 30-year low,” Aron said. “And so the acquisition is considerably cheaper in U.S. dollars.” Using stock also helped close the deal, he said.

Fears of a U.K. recession didn’t deter AMC either, Aron said. The company researched what happens to movie-theater circuits in the U.S. and in Europe during different economic cycles.

“The movie theater business is pretty recession resistant,” he said.


 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 07-13-2016, 12:54 PM:
 
I hope the AMC-Carmike deal fails. It might, in theory, be something that could be good for investors. But it's flat out guaranteed to be lousy for movie theater customers, especially bad for customers in markets (like mine) that would effectively be monopolized if the deal went through.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 07-13-2016, 10:22 PM:
 
Yeah, your local Carmikes might descend to the legendary crappiness of all the Montana Carmikes.

(Mostly in management these days...their projection looks fine, at least at the ones I've been to. But they'll still run a typical night with just two people in the concession stand and leave the other 4 stations closed with long lines snaking out of the front doors. Hell, we have 3 people in our stand on a busy night.)
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 07-13-2016, 10:53 PM:
 
We have a new Carmike and a crappy AMC here. The AMC was the very first Rave. It drove Carmike out of town, here and in Birmingham. When Rave liquidated, Carmike bought all of the Raves in the the state (and most of the south, I think) except this one. AMC bought it to get a foot hold in Alabama. In the meantime, Carmike built a brand new 13plex.
AMC has been letting their theatre rot, just like Carmike did when they owned everything in town. It is also a discount house which may be trying to put us out of business by grabbing up most of the art films (and dying with them). If the deal goes through I expect AMC to close their current house and focus all of their attention on the Carmike. Inasmuch as they will have theatres all over Alabama in that event, I will be curious to see him much attention they choose to lavish on Montgomery.
As competition hasn't improved anything in this town, I look forward to the monopolization, just to see how they screw things up.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-15-2016, 01:01 PM:
 
And it's ON:
Variety

quote:
Carmike Shareholders Approve AMC’s $1.2 Billion Takeover

Brent Lang
Senior Film and Media Editor
@BrentALang

NOVEMBER 15, 2016 | 09:07AM PT
Carmike shareholders approved a deal on Tuesday for the theater chain to sell itself to AMC Entertainment for $1.2 billion. The combined company will be the largest exhibitor in the world, bypassing Regal Entertainment.

More than 86% of the shares voted at the meeting were in favor of the merger, representing approximately 72% of Carmike’s outstanding shares, the company said.

In a statement, Carmike CEO David Passman said “this transaction creates an opportunity to deliver an even more compelling movie-going experience to more guests in many more locations across the country.”

Last summer, AMC was forced to sweeten its original $1.1 billion offer after several shareholders complained that it undervalued Carmike.

The deal with Carmike gives AMC more than 600 theater locations in 45 states across the country, including the District of Columbia. It expands the company’s geographic profile in other ways — AMC tends to have a stronger presence in urban markets, while Carmike is more associated with rural areas.

AMC was itself acquired in 2012 by China’s Dalian Wanda Group for $2.6 billion. Dalian Wanda has been on a spending spree in the past several months, reaching deals to buy the likes Odeon & UCI Cinemas, Legendary Entertainment, and Dick Clark Productions. The purchases are drawing some blowback. Some leaders in congress have asked regulators to see if stricter restrictions need to be considered to stop foreign powers from having an outsized control of U.S. media companies.

At the same time, D.C. lobbyist Richard Berman has been orchestrating a public relations campaign against Wanda’s moves and has put up billboards that raise alarm about Chinese ownership of AMC. In a statement following news of the shareholder vote, Berman decried the pact as a Chinese soft power play.

“The American public should be aware of how the Chinese government is expanding its sphere of influence overseas,” he said.


 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 11-15-2016, 04:40 PM:
 
*retch*
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-15-2016, 06:09 PM:
 
quote:
"this transaction creates an opportunity to deliver an even more compelling movie-going experience to more guests in many more locations across the country.”
That's funny.... in effect, he's saying "We suck, so we hope AMC will improve on what we've been doing."
 
Posted by John Eickhof (Member # 323) on 11-15-2016, 08:14 PM:
 
well it's time to re=badge the circuit to CCMC Chinese Carmike Multi Cinemas !
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 11-15-2016, 09:00 PM:
 
How much money was never paid out by Carmike due to their multiple bankruptcies? I know I would have at least 125,000 more from businesses who failed because they were not paid; therefore not paying me.
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 11-16-2016, 09:58 AM:
 
Not a huge Carmike fan myself, but just to make sure the facts are clear, Carmike only filed for bankruptcy once. At least from 1997 until now, if there was a bankruptcy before then I'm not aware of it.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-16-2016, 10:37 AM:
 
quote: Carmike CEO David Passman
“This transaction creates an opportunity to deliver an even more compelling movie-going experience to more guests in many more locations across the country."
I laughed when I read that piece of corporate bullshit-speak. More compelling movie-going experiences? The movie industry is running head-long in the opposite direction of delivering that.

Hollywood studios have already been making movies ever more bland, predictable, gentrified, etc. in attempts to keep their parent company overlords happy. The overlords absolutely hate taking chances on any new ideas. Unfortunately new ideas are the very thing that keeps the entertainment industry alive. Save the Cat! is the New New Testament to these guys. "American" movies are now being watered down even more for Chinese viewers and Chinese government censors. The latest in sound and projection technology or recliner seating isn't going to fix a bland, predictable script. And the high ticket and refreshment prices are the equivalent of sticking a Gucci label on a turd.

Speaking of presentation technology, buy-outs like this AMC takeover of Carmike threaten to dramatically cut efforts to invest in the theaters to make presentation quality better. With less competition these companies will have even greater luxury to coast. They'll be able to leave things like blown speaker drivers broken longer or broken permanently. We all know this is a horrible thing to do in practice. But I think executives at theater chains and movie studios have already been taking movie theater customers for granted for a long time. They think the audiences will keep paying to see the movies like they've always done. Never mind the threat of ever improving home entertainment quality and more sources of home entertainment. But that's where those parent global media companies come in to play. The companies merge and get bigger in a never ending attempt to blockade the choices of viewers.

quote: Variety Article
The deal with Carmike gives AMC more than 600 theater locations in 45 states across the country, including the District of Columbia. It expands the company’s geographic profile in other ways — AMC tends to have a stronger presence in urban markets, while Carmike is more associated with rural areas.
I think it would have been more accurate to say Carmike's theater locations are concentrated in small to medium sized cities. The term "rural" almost sounds like an insult. I suppose to someone writing an entertainment article in the sprawl of Los Angeles a modest sized city of 100,000 residents might as well be an outpost on the moon.

AMC has some overlap in the same "rural" areas. AMC is the latest owner of our kinda crappy Central Mall theater in Lawton. With our 1st run theater market monopolized I think there is now only one factor or chance AMC could build a new theater in downtown Lawton: getting out from under very high Central Mall rent prices. I think our local 70's era mall will fall into a state of crisis soon. Sears was one of the mall's original anchor tenants. I think it's only a matter of time before Sears/Kmart gets liquidated. JCPenny's was closed for months after serious flooding damage (the store is set to re-open this weekend). Anyway, I think it's a losing proposition to run a poorly designed, small 12-plex in a mall that is widely blamed for ruining our city's original downtown.

quote: Variety Article
Dalian Wanda has been on a spending spree in the past several months, reaching deals to buy the likes Odeon & UCI Cinemas, Legendary Entertainment, and Dick Clark Productions. The purchases are drawing some blowback.
Uh, yeah, "blowback" that is more than 25 years overdue. At this point any complaints from lawmakers could draw laughs. These guys have been Rip Van Winkle in terms of their oversight on what has happened to America's entertainment industry. The music industry is a shadow of its former self. The movie industry is headed the same direction. Creativity has been one of America's greatest strengths. All these global mergers and acquisitions are trying hard to suffocate that creativity and ruin America's dominance of world popular culture.

quote: Richard Sherman, D.C. Lobbyist
“The American public should be aware of how the Chinese government is expanding its sphere of influence overseas.”
At this point, any influence and propaganda from the Chinese government would just get in line with all the home-grown influence and propaganda being spouted by our big media companies, elected leaders and "alt" sites whoring for page views on the Internet. The concept of objectivity is pretty much dead in the United States. America's general public seems to be perfectly happy with that.
 
Posted by Frank Cox (Member # 6258) on 11-16-2016, 11:36 AM:
 
I have read a few articles lately stating that malls in general are feeling the pinch. More and more people are shopping for stuff online, avoiding the crowds and traffic, and that leads to less foot traffic overall in the malls.

Since the reason for being in a mall, and the justification for the high rents, is the amount of traffic walking past your store it's easy to see where this constitutes a problem.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-16-2016, 12:05 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I think it would have been more accurate to say Carmike's theater locations are concentrated in small to medium sized cities. The term "rural" almost sounds like an insult
FWIW, when Carmike originally went public it described itself in its prospectus of specializing in small towns with no competition. This was, of course, before the buying spree that lead to its bankruptcy. I'm sure they still have plenty of those 30+ year old crappy theatres doing business in small towns without competition.

As I probably mentioned in an earlier post, AMC bought the first Rave so they would have an foothold in Alabama. Now that they have the newer Carmike, I expect the former Rave to close and Carmike/AMC will once again have a monopoly in this town (except for us, of course), as will suck as much as ever.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-16-2016, 01:52 PM:
 
quote: Frank Cox
I have read a few articles lately stating that malls in general are feeling the pinch. More and more people are shopping for stuff online, avoiding the crowds and traffic, and that leads to less foot traffic overall in the malls.
Brick and mortar retail stores have been getting hurt badly by online shopping. The crowds and traffic at shopping malls can be annoying, but people generally like getting out of the house and going to places where there's lots of other people. But people might love a bargain even more.

Sales tax is by far the main culprit why brick and mortar retail is getting killed by online merchants. Customers will go "show rooming," checking out a new TV set or other big ticket item at a retail store, then go home and order it on Amazon and save a couple hundred bucks via no sales tax. This problem will only continue getting worse as long as the unfair imbalance remains. I suppose customers will only start caring about this issue when they start losing their own jobs over it. They still won't care if it's just the local tax base getting decimated by the problem.

Aside from sales tax and online shopping, the indoor shopping mall concept has become widely hated by urban planners. The "lifestyle center" or "town center" concept is all the rage now. The shopping center is still mostly a shopping mall. Instead of everything being joined together in one indoor building the shops all have outdoor entrances with sidewalks, trees, landscaping and in some cases even streets with a few parking spots out front. Most of these places still have at least a couple or so big parking lots, but the lots aren't wrapping all the way around an isolated mall building anymore.

I think these town center style malls are trying to mimic trendy shopping and entertainment districts found in some giant cities and tourist attractions. They ditch the bland 70's looks and climate control of an indoor shopping mall, but can't shake the sterilized feel of gentrification. A truly "hip" shopping and entertainment district needs unique, independent stores, restaurants and night spots not found anywhere else.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-16-2016, 04:07 PM:
 
Just out of curiosity, just what do these "lifestyle centers" do up in the Frozen North where in can be below zero for weeks at a time?
We have one here, and although the heat and humidity is gawdawful, at least you don't get frostbite walking from store to store.
I'll just add I hate malls and lifestyle centers, but then I'm old and cranky and they don't want me around anyway.
(Though if they really want to capture the retro feel of shopping, they need a single screen movie theatre).
 
Posted by James Wyrembelski (Member # 9037) on 11-16-2016, 05:55 PM:
 
Our closest mall (about 30 minutes) in Midland, MI defaulted on a 39.1 million dollar loan and went into foreclosure.

"The loan matured, and rather than refinance, “the property owner felt that it is in the best interest to go this route,” Kalil said" According to the Midland daily news.

I should add though that its been taken over and will be continued to run. Its claimed that it's financially healthy, but anyone that goes in there and compares whats offered to 10 years ago....you can see the writing on the wall already.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-16-2016, 05:59 PM:
 
quote: Martin McCaffery
I'm sure they still have plenty of those 30+ year old crappy theatres doing business in small towns without competition.
Or else they do like they've been doing in Billings, which is use a building until its lease runs out, then abandon it and build a newer building and start the process again.

Currently in Billings there are 16 screens worth of abandoned Carmike theater buildings. One of them (a 7-plex) has been revived once as a discount house, but failed. Another (a twin) has been sitting there doing nothing since the late '90s, despite being right next to the city's largest mall. I assume these buildings have continued to gather dust because they have concrete sloped floors and can't really be used for anything else...or else the owners have pie-in-the-sky price ambitions, what with Billings being a growing city and all.

I'm sure Bobby is right about an L.A. writer thinking of a town like Billings as rural. It's the biggest city in Montana, but even in the dead-center of town you can drive maybe 20 minutes and you'll be in the middle of the relatively uncivilized countryside.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-16-2016, 06:25 PM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
Or else they do like they've been doing in Billings, which is use a building until its lease runs out, then abandon it and build a newer building and start the process again.
Yup, they did that here, too. There are two abandoned theaters, a 10 and an 8 and an 8 that just got reopened by the Evans chain as a 3. There were many other abandoned theaters, but they've been torn down or converted.

They run them down and toss them out. One of my ex-projectionist was doing some pickup work at a Carmike building up shows. He got fired because he cleaned one of the machines.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-16-2016, 10:27 PM:
 
Here in Lawton Carmike kept the old 8-plex around that they opened in 1994. It's now a bargain theater with the new 13-plex nearby. The old Video Triple they operated until the late 1990's was converted into a hardware supply store. The Showcase Twin where I first watched The Empire Strikes Back was converted into a Blockbuster Video store. Then it was demolished when Blockbuster folded. Now there's a different small strip shopping center in that space.

It's generally easier to convert a small theater into another type of retail space. A big multiplex building can't really be converted into anything else. It just has to be demolished. And even then the property may not get re-used. Our old Cache 8 multiplex was torn down years ago. Those open acres of property, the crumbling parking lot and even the old sign are just sitting there. It's kind of a lousy location. There's a freeway style "Y" intersection there, so traffic can only access that site going Eastbound. Maybe the city can turn that land into a park or something.
 
Posted by Michael Riley (Member # 5693) on 11-17-2016, 08:13 PM:
 
So what happens to all the theaters that the Justice Department doesn't let them buy for anti-trust reasons? Regal more likely than not won't want them, especially if they're older theaters in smaller markets. Maybe some of them will get picked up by regional chains or independent buyers, but most will probably close. I know of one theater here that has had at least 3 or 4 different owners in as many years since Showcase Cinemas exited the market.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-17-2016, 09:01 PM:
 
As far as I can tell every one of the screens Carmike currently has in operation will go to AMC. With no questions asked. Maybe the DOJ would pay a slight amount of lip service to anti-trust concerns if some movie-going markets in major cities were getting monopolized through this deal. Since the monopolizing is mainly happening in smaller city markets like mine the DOJ probably shrugs and says, "who cares?"
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 11-18-2016, 05:20 PM:
 
Uh....what the duck, may I ask, is the "Guest Experience?" A guest is someone who DOESN'T PAY. You have a guest over, you don't charge them for their room and especially for way over-priced junk FOOD. You don't offer them a hotdog (what Bobby rightfully calls a turd) and charge them $10 for it and think they should be happy that you're giving them free mustard! "Guest Experience" my hairy ass. Just another example of twisting words to sound like something other than what they really mean. Marketing BS, or in honest language, you know....LYING. The LIEMAX Experience....the AMC Guest Experience....same bullshit.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 11-18-2016, 05:26 PM:
 
quote: Martin McCaffery
Let's see if they infect AMC.
Not sure that's a viable comparison Martin. They are both already infected really bad, so its more like which is gonna infect the other so the infection evens itself out. Also, Dumb buys Dumber comes to mind. Both are just downright awful.

Mark
 
Posted by Frank Cox (Member # 6258) on 11-18-2016, 07:38 PM:
 
Hotels and restaurants have been calling their customers Guests forever.
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 11-19-2016, 02:44 AM:
 
Yah...and it's just as idiotic when they do it.
 
Posted by Manny Montes (Member # 5639) on 11-30-2016, 01:17 AM:
 
Not necessarily, a guest is defined as "a person who patronizes a hotel, restaurant, etc., for the lodging, food, or entertainment it provides"

Anyone in the hospitality industry knows that hotels always call them "guests" and not customers, heck pretty much everyone except retail calls them "guests" now. It has nothing to do with if they're a paying customer or a comp, but rather the level of service you are expected to provide to them.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-30-2016, 03:14 PM:
 
Yeah, "guest" is one of those words that has multiple meanings. If you look it up it'll have like 5 definitions. It's just word evolution -- like, "movie" hasn't necessarily meant a roll of film for several decades now.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-30-2016, 06:31 PM:
 
"Movie" is an acceptable term. "Film" is not acceptable at all. Not unless it is shot on fim, post-produced on film and projected on film. Those who don't like my stand on this can please be happy I'm not calling the content played in theaters now "videos" or "TV shows."
 
Posted by Eric Hooper (Member # 1730) on 12-01-2016, 10:32 AM:
 
It always cracks me up on NFL football games how they still say they'll "review the film" or "review the tape"...
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 12-01-2016, 12:29 PM:
 
What would be a good alternative though? Saying "let's check the digital video" doesn't roll off the tongue as well as "let's check the film." And saying "let's check the video" makes it sound too amateurish....I mean, "EVERYBODY" has video cameras now, right?
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 12-01-2016, 02:20 PM:
 
I'm still looking for the "dial" on my cell phone so I can make calls...
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 12-01-2016, 04:58 PM:
 
Of course, we now have The Media referring to video's recorded on a cell phone as "the tapes."
 
Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 12-04-2016, 03:04 PM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
What would be a good alternative though? Saying "let's check the digital video" doesn't roll off the tongue as well as "let's check the film." And saying "let's check the video" makes it sound too amateurish....I mean, "EVERYBODY" has video cameras now, right?
"Let's check the feature."
 
Posted by Jesse Skeen (Member # 586) on 12-04-2016, 03:22 PM:
 
I love when someone in an online video shot with a cell phone camera will look at it and say "Are you filming this? STOP FILMING!" If I'd been there I'd say "No, I'm not filming. How would I even fit any film into this camera?"
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 12-20-2016, 03:34 PM:
 
And they're clear for take-off:
Variety

quote:
AMC Entertainment Reaches Settlement With Justice Department to Clear Carmike Merger

DECEMBER 20, 2016 | 08:55AM PT
AMC Entertainment has reached a settlement with antitrust officials at the Justice Department that will clear the way for its $1.2 billion acquisition of Carmike Cinemas.

AMC will divest theaters in 15 markets, sell off its holdings, and relinquish governance rights in National CineMedia, and transfer 24 theaters with 384 screens to the network of Screenvision Media.

“Moviegoers across the United States have benefited from head-to-head competition between AMC and Carmike that has kept ticket prices in check and delivered a higher quality movie experience,” said Renata Hesse, acting assistant attorney in the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. “Today’s settlement will ensure that movie theater competition is preserved in 15 local markets where AMC and Carmike currently compete.”

She also said that requiring AMC to divest from National CineMedia and transfer screens to Screenvision “will promote continued vigorous competition between the two leading cinema advertising networks — competition that the division fought to protect when it blocked the NCM-Screenvision merger.”

The DOJ filed suit to block the NCM-Screenvision merger in November of 2014. The two companies then abandoned their plans to combine. NCM and Screenvision together serve more than 80% of U.S. movie screens and compete for exclusive contracts for pre-show advertising.

The DOJ had concerns with the AMC-Carmike merger because they are competitors in 15 markets.

Under the terms of the settlement, which still must be approved by a federal judge, AMC must divest the majority of its equity interest in NCM so that it owns no more than 4.99% of the company.

The settlement also requires “firewalls” to ensure that AMC does not obtain NCM’s, Screenvision’s, or other movie exhibitors’ competitively sensitive information “or become a conduit for the flow of such information between NCM and Screenvision,” according to the DOJ.


As I suspected, I think this means the end to AMC's theatre here, in Montgomery, the former RAVE. Where else to they directly compete?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 12-20-2016, 04:14 PM:
 
I'm a little confused about the Variety article and what it implies AMC has to do with unloading existing theaters in this deal. Are they saying AMC cannot take over existing Carmike locations in markets where AMC already has a presence, no matter how big or small the market may be?

Considering the size of both AMC and Carmike I figured the two chains would have had competing theaters in more than just 15 markets. Or is the DOJ looking specifically at places where AMC would have a market monopoly after the takeover? I guess I would need to see the list of theaters AMC plans to unload.

Either way there isn't a really simple answer for AMC over which theaters it should keep and which others should be sold to other rival chains (or just closed).

Carmike recently opened a new 12-plex in Tulsa, OK. It has a "Big D" premium screen. AMC has the Southroads 20 in Tulsa; that one has an IMAX-branded screen. There's plenty of competition in Tulsa from Cinemark, Warren and B&B.

Here in Lawton the merger would create a monopoly for AMC on 1st run screens. Is a 100,000 person market such as Lawton big enough for the DOJ to care about? AMC has the old Central Mall 12 theater originally opened by Dickinson Theaters in 2001. Carmike opened its new Patriot 13 theater a year ago, featuring one of the biggest "Lie-MAX" houses I've seen. Carmike has the 22 year old Carmike 8 here still running as a 2nd run/bargain theater. Its only competition is the old Vaska single screen theater, which is open only sporadically (I don't know how they're even staying in business).

Edit: I found an article at Deadline giving a list of the affected markets:

quote: Deadline
Communities where AMC will have to divest theaters include Montomery, Ala.; Destin and Miramar Beach, Fla.; Orange Park and Fleming Island, Fla.; Cumming, Ga.; Lithonia and Conyers, Ga.; Crestwood and Lansing, Ill.; Bloomington, Ill.; Peoria, Ill.; Grove Heights and Oakdale, Minn.; Mounds View, Minn.; Rockaway and Sparta, N.J.; Westfield, N.J.; Lawton, Okla.; Allentown, Penn.; and Madison, Wisc.
So, here in Lawton, it looks like the old Central Mall theater AMC acquired in the Starplex buy-out may be spun off to someone else, if they can even find a chain crazy enough to buy the location.

Considering the tiny size of the screens in relation to the high rent in an outdated 40 year old mall that theater is not a good deal by itself. It would have to be bundled in with other better theaters as part of a larger deal. I think there is a good chance that theater could simply shut down for good. Some of that depends on the terms of the lease with Central Mall. A rival chain could run it for a couple or so years just to get established in this market and then build a better standalone multiplex. But a rival chain sure isn't going to sign up to run a tiny 15-year old multiplex if they have to run it for 5 years or even 20.
 
Posted by Jonathan M. Crist (Member # 413) on 12-21-2016, 12:40 AM:
 
According to AMC's conference call they mostly plan to jettison Carmike locations. In the Pennsylvania Lehigh Valley that presents an interesting choice:

Lehigh Valley Choice

From the Allentown Morning Call
To complete its acquisition of Carmike Cinemas, AMC must get rid of one, possibly two theaters, in the Valley.

To complete its $1.2 billion acquisition of Carmike Cinemas, AMC Entertainment Holdings will divest some theaters in 15 markets across the country — including the Lehigh Valley — under a settlement reached with the U.S. Justice Department to satisfy antitrust concerns.

And according to the terms of the settlement announced Tuesday, AMC has an interesting choice to make in the Lehigh Valley.

Option No. 1 is to divest its theater at the Tilghman Square Shopping Center in South Whitehall Township [an AMC built recently remodeled 8 Plex from 1988], which now has plush recliner seating and a full-service bar, and keep the two local Carmike locations at the Promenade Shops at Saucon Valley [16 Plex former Rave] and on Catasauqua Road in Hanover Township, Lehigh County [a Carmike built 16 Plex].

Or AMC can go with Option No. 2, which is keep the AMC Tilghman 8 and sell the two Carmike theaters to a "buyer approved by the United States to eliminate the merger's likely harm."

An AMC spokesman did not respond to a call and email regarding whether the chain has made a choice on which Lehigh Valley option it will take. But on a conference call with analysts Tuesday afternoon, AMC President and CEO Adam Aron said most of the theaters AMC plans to divest will be Carmike theaters.

"The ... theaters are expected to be sold in the next 60 days," said Aron, who did not say whether AMC already has lined up a buyer.

Regardless of which option AMC chooses, the Lehigh Valley's movie-watching landscape is sure to be shaken up, with a new cast member likely joining the field next year and preventing what the Justice Department considered a potentially AMC-controlled market in the Allentown area.

But which theater — or theaters — will AMC decide to sell? And who would buy them?

To Richard Wolfe, owner of the Roxy Theatre in Northampton, AMC would be smart to keep the Promenade Shops theater, even if it means divesting its newly remodeled Tilghman 8 in South Whitehall.

"The Promenade is the top theater in the Lehigh Valley — by far," said Wolfe, who has owned 18 theaters over a 50-year career.

In addition, Wolfe noted, the Movie Tavern slated to open in Lower Macungie Township next year would be in direct competition with AMC Tilghman 8. The two sites are separated by just three miles.

Wolfe predicted two chains will be interested buyers.

Regal Entertainment Group could be interested in an Allentown-area location, he said. Regal operates megaplexes at the Northampton Crossings shopping center in Lower Nazareth Township as well as Quakertown and outside Phillipsburg.

The other potential buyer? Wolfe suggested Cinemark, which operates a theater at Stroud Mall in Monroe County, could be interested in becoming a player in the area.

For AMC, the Justice Department approval it received Tuesday was the final regulatory hurdle it needed to clear to complete its acquisition of Carmike. The deal was first announced in March and has drawn criticism from some politicians who have taken exception to AMC's owner, the Chinese Dalian Wanda Group, controlling the soon-to-be largest theater chain in the United States.

With final approval in hand, Aron said Tuesday he expects the acquisition of Carmike to close by year's end.

In addition to divesting theaters in 15 markets, AMC also is required to sell off most of its holdings and relinquish all of its governance rights in National CineMedia and transfer 24 theaters — including one in Allegheny County — with a total of 384 screens to the network of Screenvision.

Here are the divestiture choices from the approved settlement agreement:

Settlement Agreement With Divestiture Chart
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 12-21-2016, 01:32 AM:
 
It grosses me out when whole theaters just get talked about/thrown around like toys. If I were one of the theaters in question I'd be hoping for a little guy to buy me for sure.

Wonder who will end up buying them.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 12-21-2016, 07:36 AM:
 
Here in Montgomery, the choice is between a 2 year old Carmike and a 16 year old ex-Rave that AMC has been running as a discount house. I really don't see anyone buying the Rave (unless those people who tried running the Easdale want to take another shot at Montgomery).

Just an historical note from some of my reading in the last year, back in the pre-chain, single screen days, movie theatres used to get traded back and forth like baseball cards. It's really how chains like Martin (the predecessor to Carmike) developed into region chains.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 12-21-2016, 08:48 AM:
 
In the Lehigh Valley, PA market AMC's most obvious choice would be to keep the Carmike Promenade 16 theater in the Promenade Shops center. It's a big 16 screen multiplex and has an IMAX-branded premium screen. I know AMC is big on recliners, but the choice between a small yet remodeled 22 year old 8-plex versus a well performing, fairly new 16-plex looks pretty easy (at least on the surface anyway).

The PDF showing the theater divestiture chart for Lawton only showed the two first run theaters here (AMC's tiny 12-plex in Central Mall and Carmike's new Patriot 13). I'm a little surprised they didn't include the 2nd run Carmike 8 in the chart with the new Patriot 13 location. Does AMC operate any 2nd run/bargain theaters?

Either way it might be in AMC's best interest to keep both Carmike locations on Lawton's west side. If either theater was taken over by another chain it could raise the risk of both theaters going 1st run and then being plunged into an allocation setup on movie bookings. The two theaters can't play the same movies head to head since they're located too close to each other.

The only scenario I can see that makes sense for AMC to keep the little Central Mall theater is running out the last 4 years of the lease (if it's on a 20 year lease dating back to 2001) and then building a much better theater downtown. And that's assuming AMC would want to still maintain a presence in this market.

I'm wondering which theater chains will be interested in scooping up these divested theaters from the Carmike takeover. Regal doesn't have much in Oklahoma. Cinemark's HQ is just 200 miles away from Lawton. I like Warren Theaters, but they tend to build their own theaters from the ground up rather than take over existing sites. What about smaller specialty chains like Studio Movie Grill or Alamo Drafthouse?
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 12-21-2016, 09:08 AM:
 
In Oakdale and Moundsview, Minnesota (suburbs of Minneapolis/St. Paul) Carmike has a 20 plex and 15 plex respectively. Each have stadium seating but are almost 20 years old. They are not part of malls/shopping complexes but stand alone complexes. I wonder who will end up with them, or if they'll just close.
 
Posted by Scott Jentsch (Member # 1681) on 12-21-2016, 10:07 AM:
 
quote: Buck Wilson
It grosses me out when whole theaters just get talked about/thrown around like toys. If I were one of the theaters in question I'd be hoping for a little guy to buy me for sure.
Welcome to the fun reality of mergers and acquisitions. I survived quite a few, but eventually fell victim to the endless cycle of considering employees mere "headcount" to be tabulated in a spreadsheet.

And that's what it is. Assets and liabilities. Headcount. Expenses. Revenue efficiences. "Synergies" blah blah blah.

When you reduce everything to items on a spreadsheet, the actual people it affects doesn't come into it.

quote:
Communities where AMC will have to divest theaters include Montomery, Ala.; Destin and Miramar Beach, Fla.; Orange Park and Fleming Island, Fla.; Cumming, Ga.; Lithonia and Conyers, Ga.; Crestwood and Lansing, Ill.; Bloomington, Ill.; Peoria, Ill.; Grove Heights and Oakdale, Minn.; Mounds View, Minn.; Rockaway and Sparta, N.J.; Westfield, N.J.; Lawton, Okla.; Allentown, Penn.; and Madison, Wisc.
The last entry there caught my eye. There is an AMC in the Madison, Wisconsin area, but no Carmike at all. The next closest AMC location is 36 miles away, and the closest Carmike is more than 80 miles away in DeKalb, Illinois.

Update: I forgot that Carmike had purchased Sundance Cinemas. The Sundance Cinemas 608 Madison would be an easy location for AMC to toss to someone else. I could see someone like iPic or Landmark picking it up.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 12-21-2016, 10:49 AM:
 
quote: McCall News Article
An AMC spokesman did not respond to a call and email regarding whether the chain has made a choice on which Lehigh Valley option it will take. But on a conference call with analysts Tuesday afternoon, AMC President and CEO Adam Aron said most of the theaters AMC plans to divest will be Carmike theaters.
How much work has to go into converting the branding scheme and material supply chain of an existing movie theater into that of another chain? Obviously it would take more work than replacing signs on the building and brand marks on the poster cases. Is there so much work involved that it would make AMC keep a crappy theater that already has AMC branding in place versus taking over a better theater with Carmike branding on it?

I probably wouldn't mind if AMC sold our two Carmike locations on Lawton's West side to some other chain. How much worse could it be than if AMC took over those sites? It would leave AMC free to do something legit downtown.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 12-22-2016, 07:49 AM:
 
Well, AMC is not waiting for final approval. Assimilation has begun. Resistance is futile:
Welcome to the AMC Family
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 12-22-2016, 08:33 AM:
 
Wow, there's a few singles and twins in that list
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 12-22-2016, 11:35 AM:
 
By the looks of that location list here in Lawton AMC will sell off that new Patriot 13 theater, keep the tiny 12-plex mall theater they acquired in the Starplex buy out and take over the old Carmike 8.

I guess that sort of makes sense since a new theater would seem to be easier to sell. I'm just wondering if AMC will change the Carmike 8 (what they call the "Lawton 8") back into a first run theater. If they did so an allocation setup would have to go into place between the Carmike 8 and Patriot 13.
 
Posted by Michael Riley (Member # 5693) on 12-22-2016, 08:34 PM:
 
Interesting, the local theater here that AMC couldn't buy when they purchased Starplex for anti-trust reasons and was instead sold to Carmike was instead sold this time to a tiny chain called Picture Show. In the span of 3 years now it's gone from Showcase - Rave - Starplex - Carmike - Picture Show, I might even be missing one between Showcase and Rave.
 
Posted by David Meechan (Member # 8423) on 02-15-2017, 12:10 AM:
 
The only local to me AMC/Carmike on the Divestiture list I see is AMC Southpoint 17, in Durham NC. Am I understanding that the location there needs to be sold in order to comply with the DOJ ruling?

Additionally, I don't understand how they're not forced to divest more locations of the Raleigh/Durham market, since they are now the majority exhibitor here. Heck, about 10 years or so back, Regal had to divest in a few theatres here per the DOJ.

AMC/Carmike now have 6 or 7 locations in the area, with Regal being the next nearest competitor at 3.

Any insight into how the DOJ picks which theaters have to go? And how does one 'buy' a location such at the AMC Southpoint?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 02-21-2017, 03:19 PM:
 
Has anyone heard what theater chain (or chains) will be buying the divested theaters AMC is selling off from the AMC-Carmike buyout?

Starting 12-20-16 AMC had a 60 day window to sell off the theaters it needed to sell to other chains. We've reached that 60 day mark now, but still no news. The Carmike web site is still working though.
 
Posted by Scott Jentsch (Member # 1681) on 02-21-2017, 10:43 PM:
 
AMC has started to rebrand some Carmike locations as "AMC Classic" locations, such as the AMC Classic Fashion Square 10 in Saginaw, Michigan.

I haven't seen any Carmikes with name changes (other than AMC).
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 02-22-2017, 08:58 AM:
 
The DOJ ruled AMC had to sell off certain theaters in 15 markets to other theater chains to avoid having monopolies in those markets. I'm trying to figure out if they have had any buyers for those theaters.
 
Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 02-22-2017, 09:47 AM:
 
My understanding was that 60-day number was a target set by ,AMC, not a mandate.

Investor speculation is that Regal will buy the screens in a single deal, but again...that's speculation.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-01-2017, 11:24 AM:
 
The 60 day number is the comment period:
quote:
As required by the Tunney Act, the proposed settlement and the department’s competitive impact statement will be published in the Federal Register. Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed settlement during a 60-day comment period
Which should be up now. So unless there were objections, it will get finalized, approved (if there is still someone in the DOJ's Anti-Trust division), and Filed with the court. THEN AMC has five days to divest, but may be given extensions by the DOJ.

quote:
Defendants are ordered and directed, within sixty (60) calendar days after the filing of the Complaint in this matter, or five (5) calendar days after notice of entry of this Final Case
Judgment by the Court, whichever is later, to divest the Initial Theatre Divestiture Assets in a manner consistent with this Final Judgment to one or more Acquirer(s) acceptable to the United States in its sole discretion. The United States, in its sole discretion, may agree to one or more extensions of this time period, not to exceed sixty (60) calendar days in total, and shall notify the Court in such circumstances. Defendants agree to use their best efforts to divest the Initial Theatre Divestiture Assets as expeditiously as possible.

So stay tuned, things should be happening.
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 03-01-2017, 11:32 AM:
 
I do notice that most of the staff, including the manager, at
a big Sundance/Carmike/AMC just down the street from one of
the screening rooms I work at are all "gone". I used to know
a wholebuncha people there- - and now they're all history.
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 03-01-2017, 03:05 PM:
 
Bloomberg News

quote: "Bloomberg News"

AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., the theater chain controlled by China’s second-richest man, outlined a new marketing strategy following its takeover of Carmike Cinemas, saying it will create new brands like AMC Classic and AMC Dine-In and retire the acquired company’s name.

Adam Aron, chief executive officer of the world’s biggest cinema chain, also said on a earnings call Tuesday that AMC is weighing proposals from Hollywood studios that would let movie fans see new films at home sooner. Any deal involving AMC, controlled by Chinese billionaire Wang Jianlin, would include a share of the studios’ added revenue, he said.

Hollywood film companies and theaters are trying to adapt to the rise in digital distributors, such as Netflix, that have contributed to a drop in attendance. AMC, based in Leawood, Kansas, joins Regal Entertainment Group and Cinemark Holdings Inc., the No. 2 and No. 3 U.S. exhibitors, in publicly conceding they’re considering plans to reduce the 90 days of exclusivity they enjoy before new releases become available in homes.

“The reason we’re intrigued by all this is because, if this is done right and this is done intelligently and our revenue share is significant enough, we believe that we have the opportunity to grow and increase AMC revenues,” Aron said on the call.

The timing of any change remains unclear, with Aron saying he could see a deal in months or no progress at all.

“There are so many proposals floating around, people having different views,” Aron said. “A consensus is going to need to emerge for this not to be a one-company, one-studio deal, but more of an industrywide effort.”
Recent Acquisitions

AMC, controlled by Wang’s Dalian Wanda Group Co., has become the world’s biggest exhibitor after acquiring Carmike Cinemas, Odeon & UCI in the U.K. and most recently Nordic Cinema Group, a deal announced in January.

Aron said a new “AMC Classic” brand would be used for its smaller theaters and markets, and a third smaller brand called “AMC Dine-in” would be deployed at the about 60 locations with full kitchens and bars.

In the U.S., about 400 locations will be AMC theaters, with Imax Corp. and Dolby Laboratories Inc. providing the premium, large-format experiences. Classic theaters, which AMC describes as fun, friendly and local with value in mind, will account for about 200, according to a statement. The smaller theaters will have Coca-Cola Freestyle machines and refillable popcorn buckets.


 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 03-06-2017, 02:48 PM:
 
Carmike - The Coke Classic of Movie Chains?
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2