This is topic Another "Charlies Angles" :confused: in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=000845
Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 04-12-2002, 09:26 PM:
Yes, we are going to be tortured again! Cameron Diaz has stated that another "Charlies Angels" flic is currently being made....Oh...THE TORTURE!
Posted by Paul Harnden (Member # 1034) on 04-12-2002, 09:59 PM:
Hehe...oh look I past 100!
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 4594) on 04-12-2002, 10:30 PM:
AWESOME! 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-13-2002, 01:04 PM:
Why is Charlie's Angels II a surprise? Any movie that's even slightly a hit will be sequelized, even if all the major characters die in the original. (Exceptions: Titanic, E.T., so far at least.)
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-13-2002, 04:29 PM:
Will the fabulous DREW be coming along for the ride this time so they may all kick their evil enemies to death again whilst fighting in mid-air instead of using guns? What a waste of perfectly good Kodak film. 
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 04-13-2002, 04:49 PM:
Whats really sad on the sequel is that the director (McG) is back with the entire writing and production staff, with the entire cast and also cameos by the original angels.....The director has said that he intended the film to have that comic book look, because "Its not the real world, its ANGEL WORLD, everything is much different there".
I think this guy is on ANGEL DUST.
Dave
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 4594) on 04-13-2002, 09:20 PM:
Isn't he directing the new Superman movie also?
Posted by Michael Gonzalez (Member # 593) on 04-13-2002, 11:33 PM:
Any word yet if Bill Murry is going to be in it? I read somewhere that he had some sort of altercation with Lucy Lu during filming of the 1st one. He had stated that he is not interested in being in the sequel. I bet he will do it if they paid him more money and set it up so that he and Lucy would never be in the same shot.
Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 04-14-2002, 04:42 AM:
the Superman movie has been up in the air for a LONG time. I doubt it will get off the ground. Originally, Kevin Smith wrote a treatment of the script for Tim Burton to direct, and Burton apparently hated the script, causing a feud between the both of them.
Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 04-14-2002, 09:36 AM:
Well I think Drew Rocks! so I'll be going to see it!
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 04-14-2002, 07:07 PM:
Source: Variety Like a bolt out of the blue, McG, director of CHARLIE’S ANGELS, has been hired to develop a new big screen adventure for SUPERMAN, with J.J. Abrams (creator of ALIAS) writing the script.
Jon Peters will produce, as he’s been associated with the project as far back as Kevin Smith’s abortive attempt at reviving the franchise.
Nicolas Cage will not be involved with the production.
END OF LINE.
Posted by Melany Lowe (Member # 1084) on 04-15-2002, 07:53 AM:
Crispin Glover and all of the angels are coming back and Jamie Foxx is replacing Bill Murray which is sad.but still life goes on
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-15-2002, 01:24 PM:
Well at least we can be glad that Nicolas Cage is out of the Superman project. That would have been the biggest casting mistake since Paramount tried to put Stallone in Beverly Hills Cop.
Posted by Michael Gonzalez (Member # 593) on 04-15-2002, 04:50 PM:
Jamie Foxx????? I am assuming that he isn't going to be playing the part of Bosley. Crispin Glover would be the only reason why I might watch a sequel. Hello... Hello.. Hello Mc Fly is anybody home?
Posted by Chad Souder (Member # 343) on 04-18-2002, 08:19 AM:
Mike -You mean the biggest casting mistake since Toby McGuire as Spiderman? Granted, I haven't seen it yet, but come on. He sounds like he's 12, and looks about as athletic as Woody Allen.
------------------
"Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!" - Homer Simpson
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 04-18-2002, 01:02 PM:
Dont discount Toby McGuire as Spiderman just yet. Remember there was a major ferver about casting Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, but then fears were quelled when the finished product hit the street. Sometimes artistic interpretation has to take a few liberties with the source material to tell the story on screen properly. Sure it wont match exactly, but lets wait and see here.Plus with X-Men, you had a fantastic director in Brian Singer, and with Spiderman, you have an equally talented director in Sam Raimi, if anyone can do it there he is definately one of them. So far test audiences are giving amazing reviews, so the possibility of a decent film is rising.
As for Jamie Foxx in anything? This guy is a no talent bum, a rich one, but no talent. I TRIED to watch his HBO stand up routine, and it just seems so forced, as does his acting.
Dave
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-18-2002, 01:13 PM:
When I heard Hugh Jackman was cast as Wolverine, I thought You gotta be kidding! Well, he was excellent in that role (and you'd never know it's the same guy who played the lead in Kate & Leopold, in which he was also excellent). I suspect Toby McGuire will be the same story. I'm really looking forward to Spiderman's release.
Posted by David Favel (Member # 1125) on 04-18-2002, 04:21 PM:
And Mr Mom as Batman?I admit I was pleasantly surprised
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-18-2002, 06:21 PM:
Yeah, I think Maguire will work in Spiderman for the same reasons that Keaton worked in Batman (and also Chris Reeve in the Superman movies). They don't seem like superheroes in their "normal" looks.
Posted by Charles Everett (Member # 889) on 04-24-2002, 06:01 PM:
Another round of Charlie's Angels? Cool!Brad also will be pleased to know that there will be another edition of The Fast and the Furious. 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 4594) on 04-26-2002, 01:44 AM:
Ok, I know someone who is obsessed with Spiderman, I MEAN OBSESSED! He said that spiderman (When he's human) is not supposed to look athletic or tough, I guess he is actually supposed to be quite geeky.*I know nothing about spiderman, X-MEN I can talk ~ but no spiderman.
------------------
Brad, you're pretty darn Chipper yourself!!!