This is topic Josh's ever-updating forum picture in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=002332
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 08-07-2003, 01:37 AM:
Get him a webcam & use that! Let's streamline this operation!
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-07-2003, 01:43 AM:
Wow this is timely. I JUST noticed that I have never seen the same Josh picture twice. He must have at least 50 or 60.
I would like to take 360 pictures of myself, each from a one degree difference in the angle all around me. Then have those cycle. Better yet an animated GIF (EVERYONE loves animated GIFs) of it rotating non-stop. That's be cool for a few seconds.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 06:55 PM:
I think the "management" should post ALL of Josh's pics at full resolution in this thread. That way, "maybe" those that are ***without*** their own "member pictures" will find something else to piss & moan about.
>>> Phil
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 08-07-2003, 07:45 PM:
...When did Joe's pic STOP cycling?
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-07-2003, 08:12 PM:
I stopped cycling my pics because the member photos that they were imitating had long since been replaced by their respective members, thus making my photo spoofs obsolete, just like me. So I resorted to the original pointing pic.
And yes, I am too lazy to take more pics.
Phil, YOU need a better member pic. Your face can barely be seen. I don't understand the whole Transformer motif, but whatever!
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 08:16 PM:
Joe, I have sent tons of my pics into Brad for posting. But, as we all know, he is a jerk and will not post them.
I think he likes to harass me and not post them.
I do not even have a "smiley"!
He is a pain!
>>> Phil
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-07-2003, 08:17 PM:
Phil's trying to attract the 10-12 year-old crowd. I'm strangely aroused.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 08:21 PM:
Adam... huh? 19 is my favorite & "lucky" number...
>>> Phil
Posted by Dan Lyons (Member # 1454) on 08-07-2003, 08:34 PM:
I have more pics, but not suitable for Film-Tech.
You have to have membership at Phil's Sex Den to see them.
Danny
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 08:37 PM:
Ummm...no Danny. You can email them to my personal account.
>>> Phil
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-07-2003, 08:57 PM:
Phil, I was the one who made all of the member smilies. I can't make one for you since your face is so tiny in that pic. Maybe I'll make a Brad icon instead. He'll ban me but it'd be worth it.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 09:04 PM:
Sorry didn't know that Joe. I will send you my "virgin" pics that Brad has elected to ignor!
OBTW: I haven't got a clue where that "transformer" pic of me came from...it just sorta appeared one day.
>>> Phil
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-07-2003, 09:37 PM:
Virgin photos of Phil? God, those must be *old*!
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-07-2003, 09:41 PM:
Did they have photographs back then? Adam, are you sure Phil didn't mean sketches?
Josh promised to send me at least 100 more by the end of the month to put into rotation, so everyone can rest easy knowing they won't have to look at the same picture twice.
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-07-2003, 09:53 PM:
There are some mighty clever pictures here and I acknowledge the considerable creativity that went into some of them. But FWIW to keep a gag photo up permanently not only eliminates the novelty
but kinda defeats the purpose of having people see what one another look like.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-07-2003, 10:33 PM:
Gosh Adam, you and Brad are sooo funny! The both of yous should be on the Stage.
There is one leaving in 10 minutes...get on it!
>>> Phil
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 08-08-2003, 01:02 AM:
Steve Kraus wrote: quote:
But FWIW to keep a gag photo up permanently not only eliminates the novelty but kinda defeats the purpose of having people see what one another look like.
Steve looks like a totem pole.
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-08-2003, 04:00 PM:
That's actually a remarkable picture because it was taken in very dim light which was very orange (down lighting dimmed almost completely out). My Olympus 2020Z not only nailed the exposure but did a great job of auto white balancing. In the full version the intensity of the red glow in the soundhead from the LED's and the brightness of the DTS reader indicator give a clue as to how dark it was. I believe that is Erin Brockovich unspooling.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-08-2003, 04:12 PM:
Steve's signature - quote:
Trust me. Like it says on the money.
Haha, never noticed that before. Have a bit of a God complex?
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-08-2003, 04:36 PM:
Steve kinda looks like Pierce Brozenads with some stubble.
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-09-2003, 06:41 PM:
But the chicks dig me.
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-09-2003, 09:08 PM:
my my how these topics drift
Josh
PS more running pics on the way,if I can find them
Posted by Edward Jurich (Member # 1787) on 08-09-2003, 09:31 PM:
Steve Kraus said....
"My Olympus 2020Z not only nailed the exposure but did a great job of auto white balancing."
Is that a digital and not a film camera?
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-10-2003, 12:38 AM:
Josh, I still have a bunch but I don't know how many Brad has of you without refreshing the screen a zillion times. Brad, can you send me thumbnails of what you have so I can send you some more that you don't have (with Josh's permission, of course.)
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-10-2003, 06:49 AM:
Paul, I think all of the pics should be posted in this thread and then let the members pick the 100 best for display.
>>> Phil
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-10-2003, 10:42 AM:
Yes Edward; I've been seduced by the instant gratification and "free" (on the input end anyway) nature of digital. Still have my Pentax SLR but using it far less.
Posted by Edward Jurich (Member # 1787) on 08-10-2003, 12:18 PM:
I had a digital camera for awhile. My hard drive crashed on my computer one day and I lost all the pictures. That black and white photo I'm using on my post is from around 1962. I think digital is great for speed and general use but I prefere film for something I want to last. That includes my 16mm Bolex I still use now and then for home movies. I'm not sure how to store digital images for long term since it is being discovered that some DVD's are going bad just sitting in the box.
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-10-2003, 03:51 PM:
I've had the digital camera for almost 4 years. It was just a notch under the cutting edge of technology when I got it but now 2.1 megapixels is pretty tame so I suppose I may have to start thinking about upgrading although in reality I rarely print larger than 5 x 7" and this is fine for that. I've done 8 x 10's and they weren't bad either.
I really do need to start being more careful about backups though. Most pics are backed up to a 2nd HD but I should start burning CD's more regularly. Long term I have thought about hiring one of my clients (who own the only film recorder in town) to write my accumulation of stills out to 35mm film, probably intermediate stock as a negative. Color film fades but it is slow and predictable and I suppose I could always have them do B&W separations but my film stills are not protected that way so that may be overkill.
Posted by John Spooner (Member # 1565) on 08-11-2003, 02:03 PM:
I personally agree that a montage of pictures would be good.
From the pictures I have seen, my favourite would be of Josh in the red hooded sweat-top, second favourite in the black beanie and third in the brown sweat-top where he looks a lot like a monk.
Can I see a picture of Josh in a bandana, would suit him.
John Spooner.
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-13-2003, 09:26 PM:
Here's another

Josh
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-13-2003, 10:20 PM:
Hubba Hubba.. Looks like Josh has gone south...WAY down south to Mexico...OR at the very least Los Angeles!
BTW: Where's MY 94X T-shirt!? I want it all and I want it NOW!
And a Phil Hill Quote: "Liquor is quicker and candy is dandy, but sex wont rot your teeth!"
>>> Phil
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-14-2003, 01:50 AM:
Hey Josh.... Yo yo yo wazzup my man! Looks like u chillin wit da homiez! Bring in my peeps Josh in da hizzouse yo! Slap mah bitches and put on some 50 Cent nigga! Word.
PS - Congratulations. You have finally conformed to typical teenage dress code!
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-14-2003, 03:17 AM:
Damn, Josh...you look like you are about 22 in that picture...
You gotta put your shades on, man!!
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-14-2003, 08:22 PM:
Shadows kick ass, they make you look older. Just for John Spooner. I have a motorcycle / bandana pic I will post under the crotch rocket thread later.
JJ
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-14-2003, 09:07 PM:
Be careful Josh or you might start to look too old!
Case in point...
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-15-2003, 12:42 AM:
JFC! That is a great pic! I love it! I hope I look that good when I get to be Bob's age.
>>> Phil
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 08-15-2003, 01:04 AM:

I could understand running this hard & nearly killing yourself if the first person there got all the Hershey Bars or something, but they don't, they just lean over & hock their kidneys up.
More proof that all these young people are on crack & the legal drinking age needs to be raised to 45.
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-15-2003, 01:55 AM:
Huh?
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-15-2003, 03:08 AM:
Me thinks someone else is on crack...
>>> Phil
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-15-2003, 06:51 AM:
Anyone remember this quote?
quote:
"I don't think a person should run unless he is being chased."
Whatever Josh's reasons are for running track there is one undeniable fact, he is incredibly healthy. Perhaps that is his prize.
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 08-15-2003, 09:23 PM:
Oh please don't start talking about health... I keep putting off my running and gym going. Now I get all wheezy just posting to the forums... that's why I don't do it so much.
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-18-2003, 12:15 AM:
Me also thinks someone else is on crack.....
But if you really want to know why I run, it'll take a good page and a half to tell you.....
Josh
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-18-2003, 01:22 AM:
We're listening...
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-18-2003, 01:39 AM:
Yes, please do. It would be interesting. BUT! Please have Daryl send it thru his Daryl-O-Matic AutoSummarizer first. I have a short attention span.
>>> Phil
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 08-18-2003, 04:08 AM:
quote:
I hope I look that good when I get to be Bob's age.
Wait a minute. Now I am confused. I thought you were older than Bob.
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-18-2003, 06:40 PM:
Well, ok, maybe it wont take a page and a half, But I'll try. Whenever I sit down to right these things, I try and make them meaningful, but that seldom seems to be the case. I dont run to stay in shape really, as I have no more motivation for that. My days of high school track and XC are over, and all i really have left are independant road races. I dont really run for fun either, because when your coming down to the last half mile or so of a hard long run, its really hard to force yourslef to go on.
Something just came up. I'll finish this later...
JJ
Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 08-18-2003, 08:42 PM:
Josh,
I really enjoy your constantly refreshing portrait gallery,
"The Many Faces of Josh."
Apropos reasons for running, have you read the short story, "The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner?"
Gerard
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-18-2003, 11:03 PM:
Josh, that slide slide show looks great! Brad did an excellent job on that.
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 08-19-2003, 12:01 AM:
After a temporary bout with depression, I have rebounded and shall continue...
I dont run to stay in shape really, as I have no more motivation for that. My days of high school track and XC are over, and all i really have left are independant road races. I dont really run for fun either, because when your coming down to the last half mile or so of a hard long run, its really hard to force yourself to go on. I run because I believe it make me a better person. It gives me a refuge to blow off a huge amount of steam after shitty days, get some fresh air. There is nothing like coming down to the last 200 meters of a race and knowing you can catch a few people ahead of you. It also seems that with longer races, the satisfaction increases as well.
Thats all I have to say for now, and no it isnt quite a page, barely a paragraph.
I havent read the book, but there is a song by iron maiden called just that.
JJ
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-19-2003, 12:34 AM:
Hang in there, Josh. I've been there - more than once.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-19-2003, 12:51 AM:
I agree Paul...been there myself many times... Hang in there Josh!
While I'm way too fu*king fat & old now to run, I did do the XC stuff in HS and enjoyed it.
There is some morfins or dolphins or some such thing
in the brain that makes one feel much better mentally after running... The "Runner's High".
>>> Phil
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-19-2003, 12:58 AM:
I did the XC thing as well as track in HS too. But I never was as good as Josh.
I did it for different reasons. It kept me out of Gym classes.
One of the requirements to graduate was to learn how to swim. I faked my way through it, and still graduated anyway.
I spent 20 years in the US Navy, and never learned how to swim, either. They gave up on me.
It has its merits. The best shipboard damage controlmen are the non-swimmers. They sure as hell don't want their happy home to sink!
But I was not in that rate path. I was in Aviation Electronics.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-19-2003, 03:40 AM:
Adam was the one who wrote the script and figured out how to make the forum's software accept it.
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-19-2003, 11:42 AM:
I actually had a kick-ass script written that dissolved the photos together, but Opera refused to render it properly (actually, not at all!) so I went with the plain-Jane slideshow.
I'm glad everyone likes the new show ... I can't wait to see it running with over 300 randomized photos!
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-19-2003, 02:37 PM:
I'll have to sort out some more pictures I have of Josh. They are all JPG's now. If I can get Brad or someone to send me thumbnails of what Brad has, I can use that as a basis to determine what Brad does not have. Then I can "clear" them with Josh, and send them to Brad.
I want to clear the sending of future pictures with Josh before I send them.
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-20-2003, 04:52 PM:
Hey Adam, I did something similar back when my pics first started rotating... but with Flash. I think it was a problem for two reasons. 1, the UBB didn't like Flash. 2, it would suck redoing the Flash SWF file every time I wanted to add/change a pic. But it had dissolves, wipes, zooms, etc. All at 24fps per second (specifically).
Now I can't even remember how to use Flash. Like all Macromedia programs, it is NOT user freindly and has a horrible GUI.
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-20-2003, 05:05 PM:
I hate flash. Websites with Flash suck. I refuse to wait for them to load and go elsewhere if there is no "skip" button.
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-21-2003, 02:27 AM:
Really? The file size for my picture Flash thingy was around 100k at the most. But alas... no skip button.
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 08-29-2003, 02:01 AM:

Couldn't you emulate the nice-looking young man in Good Charlotte instead of the spiky-hair one?

"This is one of our most popular models, it has an in-the-door ice water dispenser, plus crushed & cubed ice, & easily holds enough pork butt & beer for a family of six. As an added convenience, the little light ALWAYS stays on."
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-26-2003, 04:16 AM:

Josh, stop tormenting that Gummi Worm and just eat it!
Worse than the cat, I swear.
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2