This is topic Studios Sue to End Ban on Screeners in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=002737
Posted by Mike Olpin (Member # 1115) on 11-29-2003, 11:17 AM:
From the New York Times
Story here. Registration required.
quote:
Small Studios Sue to End Ban on Videos for Award Voters
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: November 28, 2003
Some small movie production companies have sued the Motion Picture Association of America to try to end a partial ban by Hollywood studios on sending video copies of movies to awards voters.
More than a dozen companies joined in the lawsuit against the association, the movie studios' trade group, which was filed on Monday in United States District Court in Manhattan. They say the partial ban will "chill the financing of independent films" by limiting the awards they can receive. Among the 14 plaintiffs are Talking Wall Pictures, Sandcastle 5 Productions and Salty Features. A hearing is scheduled for this morning.
"Awards and accolades beget more awards and accolades, which culminate for the awards season with the Academy Awards," the lawsuit said.
In September the association's president, Jack Valenti, said a ban was necessary after videotapes and DVD's sent to awards voters were put on sale on eBay or were used to make bootleg copies. Last month the Hollywood studios partly reversed the ban, agreeing to send copies to about 5,600 Academy Awards voters but not to the far larger pool that votes on less-publicized honors. That means groups that present the Golden Globes, Screen Actors Guild awards, critics prizes and other movie honors will have to see films at theaters or at screenings arranged by studios. Oscar voters, meanwhile, can watch movies at home on copies sent by the films' distributors.
Some industry experts have said that the so-called screener copies increased prospects for art-house films, which have won a growing share of Oscars in the last decade. Rich Taylor, a spokesman for the Motion Picture Association, said the lawsuit was misguided because the reason for the ban was "to reduce piracy and to preserve the motion picture industry for filmmakers, both large and small."
The lawsuit said the ban was too restrictive and treated all movies the same, even though "it is clearly the big blockbuster movies that are most at risk of being pirated."
The suit seeks at least $25 million in damages and asks the court to find that the association was conspiring to monopolize the film industry, restricting trade through unlawful and unreasonable agreements with its governing members. It says continued enforcement of the ban will result in fewer movies, higher prices and decreased quality.
Posted by Bruce Hansen (Member # 281) on 11-29-2003, 01:57 PM:
Well, that ban did not last long. If the studios are going to send out 5600 copies, you know that someone who gets one of those copies would love to make a few extra bucks by selling it to someone who will use it to make many copies, and sell them. The stupidity, and greed never ends.
Why should the MPAA dictate to the studios? Shouldn't each studio decide weather to send these things out or not?
Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 11-29-2003, 02:26 PM:
This is already being discussed in the MPAA, you suck! thread. Phil's post (linked above) quotes a Variety story that's about the same.
Bruce, I'll answer your question in the other thread.
--jhawk
Posted by Mike Olpin (Member # 1115) on 11-29-2003, 04:00 PM:
I lost interest in the MPAA thread around page 5 or so. I hate it when vauge topics drag on. Out here, this topic can be discussed by itself, as opposed to being discused along side Crap code, anti-piracy trailers, and a sea of other confusing tangents.
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 11-29-2003, 05:26 PM:
Even though Bruce's question was answered here, this separate discussion should stay open. I am, however, moving this to Yak.
Posted by Charles Everett (Member # 889) on 11-30-2003, 12:11 PM:
Movie City News had this story before the AP. The headline from the "Old News is Good News" column on the home page:
Decision On Screener Ban Temporary
Restraining Order Delayed Until At Least December 3
Harvey Weinstein Named As Co-Conspirator!
Pull Quotes Of The Day from the Court:
- "You mean these awards aren't given on the merits?"
- They suddenly got their gumption up two days before Thanksgiving?
- "I don't want any rabbits coming out of any hats on Wednesday."
That hearing confirmed what we Film-Techers knew all along: Miramax doesn't want to make hit movies, Miramax only wants to buy awards!
You can catch all the fun in the transcript -- which Movie City News was glad to post. Don't worry, moderators, it's not a paid site.
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 01-13-2004, 04:52 PM:
This Just In:
quote:
Oscar 'Screener' Found on Internet, Academy Says
Tue Jan 13, 2:46 PM ET
By Bob Tourtellotte
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Hollywood's greatest fear became a reality on Tuesday as film industry officials said a digital version of an Oscar "screener" was seen on the Internet after months of industry squabbling over whether sending out the videos to Academy Award voters would lead to movie piracy.
A copy of Sony Pictures Entertainment's "Something's Gotta Give" that was sent to an Oscar voter was found to be downloadable from the Internet to a home PC, a spokesman for the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (news - web sites), which awards the Oscars (news - web sites), said.
"Sony let us know late last week that one had appeared on the Internet," Academy spokesman John Pavlik told Reuters.
The studios have all encrypted copies of their screener tapes with special codes to trace them to their recipients.
The Los Angeles Times reported that the digitized tape was linked to a Carmine Caridi, 69, a film and TV actor who appeared in "The Godfather: Part II," but officials declined comment. Caridi could not be reached for comment.
Sony Pictures spokesman Steve Elzer declined specific comments on how the copied screener was traced, saying only that: "We did everything we could do ensure the secure handling of our screeners." He said the issue was now in the hands of the Academy.
The mailing of so-called "screeners" to Academy and other award voters has long been practiced in Hollywood during the movie awards season that begins in December and ends with the Oscars, which will take place on Feb. 29.
Hollywood marketers believe screeners can help films win or be nominated for awards, which in turn can boost a movie's box office, video, DVD, and television revenues.
In late September, however, Hollywood's major studios instituted a ban on mailing out screeners because in last year's awards season several copies of Academy screeners turned up on the Internet available for downloading for free.
The digital copies gave an embarrassing black eye to the studios as they battled movie piracy on the Web. Studios believe such piracy could lead to falling revenue similar to that music companies have suffered from free downloading of digital songs.
The ban on screeners was overturned by a federal court this past fall, but not before it was loosened for Academy members who agreed they would not give the tapes away. If digital copies of their personal, software-encrypted tapes were found on the Net, they would face expulsion from the Academy.
In Hollywood, being expelled from the Academy is tantamount to being banished from a country, and industry insiders were surprised at Tuesday's news. Some Academy members have taken to cataloging the screeners and making friends check them out like they might from the library.
Pavlik said the matter is still being investigated and no action would be taken until the probe was concluded.
Sony Pictures is a unit of Japanese electronics giant, Sony Corp (news - web sites) (6758.T).
I find this an interesting wrinkle in the story, especially since they practically BEGGED and DEMANDED the right to be able to pass out screeners!
Let's see a show-of-hands: Who's surprised by this?
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 01-13-2004, 05:08 PM:
All of the people in this thread were surprised!
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 01-13-2004, 05:28 PM:
Ha!
I guess that's what I get for not visiting the Ground Floor more often!
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 01-23-2004, 07:33 AM:
FBI arrests man in Oscar screener case
quote:
Jan. 23, 2004
FBI arrests man in Oscar screener case
The FBI arrested a Chicago-area man Thursday on charges of criminal copyright infringement and illegal interception of a satellite signal as a result of the bureau's ongoing investigation into pirated Academy screeners. Russell William Sprague, 51, was arrested at his home in Homewood, Ill., a suburb of Chicago, where agents discovered hundreds of Academy screeners for recent and current movies in a search of his residence. According to an FBI affidavit, most of the screeners were originally sent to Carmine Caridi, a 22-year member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences who has been sending as many as 60 screeners a year to Sprague for at least the past three years. Sprague supplied Caridi with Federal Express shipping boxes and mailing labels. In an interview with the FBI last week, Caridi denied receiving any money for the screeners. Caridi said that he thought Sprague was a film buff and had no knowledge that Sprague had duplicated the tapes. "Mr. Caridi has not been charged with anything," FBI spokeswoman Laura Bosley said. "But the investigation is continuing, and additional arrests have not been ruled out." Caridi could not be reached for comment. (Gregg Kilday and Paul Bond)
Full story:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/film/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=2075638
Carmine Caridi filmography: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0137142/
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 01-23-2004, 08:35 AM:
What are Academy members who receive screener tapes supposed to do with them when they are done viewing them? Are they allowed to keep them or are they supposed to return them to the sender?
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 01-23-2004, 09:06 AM:
I would assume it depends on the distributor who sent the tape/DVD for "Your Consideration" to Academy members. Remember, it's not the Academy sending the screeners, it's the distributors who are lobbying for award consideration.
Even if keeping is allowed, the expectation is not to let it out of your control by lending it to friends, or giving it away.
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 01-23-2004, 09:50 AM:
Maybe they'll arrest Caridi tomorrow, once it's not his (70th) birthday...
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0137142/
quote:
Date of birth (location)
23 January 1934
New York, New York, USA
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 01-23-2004, 07:39 PM:
It's not clear that he broke any law but he certainly violated his contract regarding the handling of the screener and deserves to be booted from the Academy.
It's also not clear if the Homewood, IL man was the one made the movies available online but he was (allegedly) making copies for friends and neighbors and he or one of them (allegedly) put it on the net.
Posted by Paul Konen (Member # 41) on 01-29-2004, 01:24 PM:
Here is the latest
quote:
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Two of the movie studios whose screener video tapes were found in the home of a Chicago-area man arrested last week by the FBI (news - web sites) have sued both him and the Hollywood actor to whom the tapes were issued.
Warner Bros. Pictures and Columbia Pictures filed separate complaints Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, claiming that Russell Sprague and actor Carmine Caridi infringed on the studios' copyrights by duplicating and distributing copies of the films on both VHS and DVD.
Both suits ask the court to enjoin the two defendants from continuing to duplicate and distribute the films and seek unspecified damages.
The Warners suit involves its films "Mystic River" and "The Last Samurai." The Columbia complaint revolves around "Big Fish," on which Columbia holds the copyright, and "Something's Gotta Give," whose copyright is held jointly by Columbia and Warners.
The tapes were issued to Caridi, an Oscar voter who belongs to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. He has admitted to sending dozens of videos over the years to Sprague in the belief that he was a movie buff. But some of the films ended up on the Internet, and they were traced back to Caridi through an encrypted digital "watermark."
According to the Warners complaint, Caridi, "a member of the Academy who received 'screeners' of each of the films from Warner Bros. for his personal consideration, made the films available to defendant Russell Sprague, and possibly others, for their unauthorized and illegal use, distribution, exhibition and duplication. After receiving the films from Caridi, Sprague illegally duplicated, exhibited and distributed the films via the Internet and other media in violation of Warner Bros.' exclusive interests."
Both complaints claim that Sprague converted the analog VHS tapes to digital formats, which facilitated their being posted on the Internet.
Sprague was arrested last week by the FBI on charges of criminal copyright infringement. A federal judge in Chicago has remanded him to Los Angeles for trial, although no date has yet been set for the transfer.
In an FBI affidavit, Caridi, who has not been charged with any criminal acts, denied knowledge that Sprague was duplicating the tapes and, following his arraignment in Chicago last Friday, Sprague told reporters the charges were "baloney." Caridi's attorney could not be reach for comment.
Both Warners and Columbia contend the defendants violated the federal Copyright Act. They are asking for compensation for the damages suffered, or, alternatively, that the defendants be ordered to pay a minimum of $150,000 in statutory damages for each unlawful use of the copyrighted material.
A spokeswoman for 20th Century Fox -- another of the studios whose films were found in Sprague's possession, according to the FBI probe -- said the studio "supports the criminal case against Russell Sprague and we are currently evaluating our options in regards to a civil case."
A spokeswoman for Walt Disney Pictures, whose films also were found in Sprague's possession by the FBI, said, "Disney is cooperating with the FBI in its investigation and prosecution of Russell Sprague and is evaluating other legal steps it may take to protect its intellectual property in this matter."
Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
Full Story Here
Posted by Ron Keillor (Member # 1790) on 02-05-2004, 01:17 PM:
from the BBC news site:
Oscars expel voter over 'piracy'
Mystic River is among the movies allegedly pirated
Academy Awards bosses have kicked out a member for the first time in history after copies of confidential preview videos ended up on the internet.
The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences expelled him after they say he violated an agreement not to allow "screener" films to be distributed.
It comes after actor Carmine Caridi admitted sending videos to a friend who was charged with copyright violation.
The Oscars have cracked down on preview tapes because of fears over piracy.
The Academy asked all members to sign an agreement this year, pledging to protect their DVDs and tapes.
We had hoped that this situation would not arise
Frank Pierson
Academy president
Videos are sent to Academy members so they can vote for their favourites before the Oscars, which are being held at the end of February.
The Last Samurai, starring Tom Cruise, and Jack Nicholson's Something's Gotta Give and thriller Mystic River were among the movies that appeared on the internet.
"We had hoped that this situation would not arise," Academy president Frank Pierson said after Academy governors voted for the expulsion.
The organisation had a duty to both movie distribution companies and its other members, he said.
It has to "live up to our part of the bargain and to enforce our commitment to safeguard the video tapes sent to us", he added.
Charges
The expelled member was widely reported to be Caridi - who appeared in films like The Godfather Parts II and III - although the Academy would not officially name him.
FBI officials have said Caridi has admitted to sending videos to Russell Sprague, 51, from Homewood, Illinois.
Caridi's lawyer has said the actor "had no idea anyone else would be seeing" the films he sent Sprague.
Mr Sprague has been charged with two counts of violating copyright laws.
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 02-06-2004, 02:22 PM:
And in another twist... If the studios are serious about piracy, they should get wind of things like this...
Did I read this correctly?
quote:
Try not a pirate. try my mom works for universal studios and i have exclusive access to workprints and screeners and i hate piracy
Wonder what Mrs. Own's boss would think if they knew she allowed screeners to be handled around by her kids and all his/her friends...
Then again, I'm not exactly sure about the nature of screeners, so it is possible that I'm way off base..
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2