This is topic The Richard Greco guide to age of consent thread in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=003367

---

Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 07-16-2004, 04:28 PM:
 
Here you go Richard Greco! Clearly you live in the wrong state. might I recommend Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, D.C., Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Isnald, South Dakota, Vermont, or West Virginia?

I am wondering what the deal is with Washington. Look at the male-male and female-female sex chart. 16/18? Ummmmm, does that denote "top" vs. "bottom"?

By the way, what's wrong with New Mexico??? I guess they like to promote experimentation.





Chart from www.ageofconsent.com
 

---

Posted by Dan Lyons (Member # 1454) on 07-16-2004, 04:45 PM:
 
I want to know what's wrong with California. Everyone says how liberal we are here.. yet looking at the high ages we have compared to most states.. obviously not!
 

---

Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 07-16-2004, 04:50 PM:
 

quote: Brad Miller

---

By the way, what's wrong with New Mexico??? I guess they like to promote experimentation.

---

Either that or it's a novel approach to reducing the level of teenage pregnancies.

What's the deal with Oklahoma? Do those entries mean that gay sex is illegal if you're over 16?
 

---

Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 07-16-2004, 04:56 PM:
 
I'm going to go with my Washington theory, that's it's ok for the "top" but not the "bottom".

Phil will know. Phil, where are you???
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-16-2004, 04:57 PM:
 
That chart is pretty old and out-of-date now.

I thought I heard on the news that New Mexico is the HQ for NAMBLA?

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 07-16-2004, 05:03 PM:
 
New Mexico figures they would not have any child support issues to worry about.....and Phil is versatile according to his website
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-16-2004, 05:45 PM:
 
You see, I'm totally within the laws of Florida. Hilary Duff is 16, Lindsay Lohan is 18, and the Olsens are 18. But the thing is, the only chance I will ever have with any of them is if I was the last guy on Earth.

I bet Phil really is interested in that middle column
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-16-2004, 05:54 PM:
 

quote: Richard Greco

---

I bet Phil really is interested in that middle column

---

Hmmm... YOU **may** lose that bet, bub! ALL that I present on FT is NOT necessarily "real". Film-Tech is about film and movies. And as we all know, it's all an illusion.

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 07-16-2004, 06:15 PM:
 
The middle column is "male-female sex", Richard.
 

---

Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 07-16-2004, 06:28 PM:
 
I was surprised to see that homosexual relations are still illegal in many states. What business does the government have with regulating who is grabbing whose ass as long as both asses are old enough and consenting?

Dan - are you kidding? California really is very heavy regulated in many things. Take the whole no smoking inside-no drinking outside-everything shuts down at 2am thing. I find it strange that they have to regulate smoking in bars/restaurants by law. If the majority of people don't want to smoke in a restaurant, then they should leave it up to the owners to decide if they want to allow smoking in their place. Then the non-smokers go to the place where there is no smoking, and the smokers go to the place where it is allowed.
It really is a pity, with the optimum weather all year around, they could have the greatest outdoor nightlife here.
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-16-2004, 06:29 PM:
 

quote: Brad Miller

---

The middle column is "male-female sex", Richard.

---

(Oh my! How discusting!)

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Paul Linfesty (Member # 214) on 07-16-2004, 06:42 PM:
 

quote: Michael Schaffer

---

I was surprised to see that homosexual relations are still illegal in many states.

---

Notg anymore. All remaining sodomy laws were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court last year.
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-16-2004, 06:44 PM:
 
Considering the factthat I haven't had sex since Dec of 2001, this thread is irrelevant..I think.
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-16-2004, 06:55 PM:
 
Considering the chart as being not so much about what people should or should not be doing but rather what do you want to throw people in jail for I would say 16 seems about right. It would seem a bit ridiculous to grant people the right to endanger the lives of many total strangers on the highways but forbid them to have sex and whatever risks that may entail.
 

---

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 07-16-2004, 07:05 PM:
 
You've actually had sex, Richard Greco? J/K

I believe oral sex is still illegal in Kansas. How they enforce it is beyond me. [av=m]
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-16-2004, 08:09 PM:
 
Believe it or not Joe, YES I did. However, it wasn't very pretty. The girl I was with looked a little like the manager from the Brainwrapcomics. It was very scary, she was almost as heavy as me. And she had one boob bigger than the other. EEEWWW.

My dad even asked me, "What the hell were you thinking"

That's pretty sad...

Anyone care to hook me up with a hot girl?
 

---

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 07-16-2004, 08:16 PM:
 
You told your dad? That would be very awkward talking about sex with the parents.[av=s] Did you show them photos?
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-16-2004, 08:37 PM:
 

quote: Richard Greco

---

Anyone care to hook me up with a hot girl?

---

Great News Richard! Thru the wonders of the Film-Tech Dating Service, WE have found your ***perfect*** match! See Below:




>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Kyle Watkins (Member # 986) on 07-16-2004, 09:09 PM:
 
Well i never new there was laws on sex, having to be a certin age. How often are these inforced. Only laws i new of was the statutory rape laws. Which i belive both people need to be charge not the oldest.
As with oral sex laws, ive heard during divorce court a lot of those come into play.
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-16-2004, 10:15 PM:
 
hahaha @ Joe

He saw what she looked like when she would come over to my house. I did try to convince her to make a video of us once. I think that it was because I was working grave shift and my mind wasn't right at the time

Phil, just remember. You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me
 

---

Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 07-16-2004, 10:16 PM:
 

quote: Richard Greco

---

It was very scary, she was almost as heavy as me. And she had one boob bigger than the other. EEEWWW.

---

There's a little phrase I invented called "that fails the hand test." It keeps me out of trouble. And I mean really bad kind of trouble, not the "good" kind. I live in a decent neighborhood, but not far from here is a crappy, drug-infested area with lots of really ugly burnt-up hookers. The Lawton Police Department did a sweep of that area recently and arrested nearly 20 streetwalkers, ranging in age from 17 to 63. All I have to say to myself when I see one of them is "that fails the hand test."

Naturally, what I mean by that is there's a point where the woman is going to be ugly enough that you would rather do the solo thing with your hand instead. That's not to say I would frequent good looking prostitutes either. Just too much of a health risk. And besides, the good looking ones are just too damned expensive. Going broke also fails the hand test.
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-16-2004, 10:18 PM:
 
You know, rumor has it that she and her mother!!!!were pulling tricks...aka lot lizards....at the truck stop where I used to work. Her mother was as hideous as she. Her mom has diabetes and weighs in excess of 300+
 

---

Posted by Dan Lyons (Member # 1454) on 07-16-2004, 11:14 PM:
 
wow...can this thread get any creepier?
 

---

Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 07-16-2004, 11:16 PM:
 

quote: Michael Schaffer

---

Dan - are you kidding? California really is very heavy regulated in many things. Take the whole no smoking inside-no drinking outside-everything shuts down at 2am thing.

---

I'd be happy to do you a swap with the law here! All licensed premises (i.e. those that serve alcohol) have to close by 11pm (10.30pm on Sundays), but smoking is virtually unregulated, with the result that most pubs and bars are like gas chambers.
 

---

Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 07-16-2004, 11:27 PM:
 
Please forgive this stupid question, but what is the difference between a pub and a bar?
 

---

Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 07-16-2004, 11:28 PM:
 
Leo,
You might like Utah in that aspect as you cannot smoke inside ANY public place, apartmant building, office building, etc. The brew here is a tad on the weak side by law but there is lots of really good micro brewerys and I think our 5000' altitude more than makes up for the lower alcohol content but you feel about the same here as you would having drank the normal brew in Chicago or Wisconsin. And then there is always the Beer Nut thats right next door to CLACO where they sell plenty of high quality beer making supplies to brew yor own high octane stuff. When our customers ask for directions to the shop I always tell them to just look for the Beer Nut sign which is much larger than ours!!

Bobby Henderson said:
"Please forgive this stupid question, but what is the difference between a pub and a bar?"

Thats easy! Pubs are full of rowdy Europeans whilst a Bar is full of drunk unemployed Americans.

Mark @ CLACO
 

---

Posted by James B. Openshaw (Member # 1310) on 07-16-2004, 11:57 PM:
 
I don't get those 14/16 numbers either, but the age of 14 for South Carolina somehow doesn't surprise me.
 

---

Posted by Pravin Ratnam (Member # 1417) on 07-16-2004, 11:58 PM:
 

quote: Richard Greco

---

Her mother was as hideous as she. Her mom has diabetes and weighs in excess of 300+

---

Richard Greco Sauve, you know, judging by that description, it is possible that you still may not have had sex. Very easy to mistake one of her folds for you know what.

Also I am sorry that you won't be able to enjoy the pleasures of man - man sex in the state of Florida. Time to move, Richard, and expand your sexual pool to include both sexes and you can increase your chances.

P.S.: For the states which have 16 as the age of consent, it is possible that under 18, there may be an age differential to account for. Or it may apply only to the ones with the 16/18 markings.
 

---

Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 07-17-2004, 12:05 AM:
 
Pravin...?

Are you offering?
 

---

Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 07-17-2004, 12:08 AM:
 
Well he is in the liberal state of Georgia. Although I'm betting he is older than 16.
 

---

Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 07-17-2004, 12:10 AM:
 
Richard should probably insist on a photo, tho.

(I wonder if our Richard has a nickname...like "Dick" or something.)
 

---

Posted by Pravin Ratnam (Member # 1417) on 07-17-2004, 12:17 AM:
 
Hey, hey hey. Richard is too much man for me.
Besides, my age doesn't end with the letters 'teen' and hence, I am too old for him.

By the way, Bobby, good looking hookers need not be expensive. I heard Montreal is reasonable and legal. Road trip to Montreal!
You know, I meant to check out some theaters in Montreal. Yeah , that's it.
 

---

Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 07-17-2004, 12:25 AM:
 
[Private note to to Bobby: Add lube to your travel pack.]
 

---

Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 07-17-2004, 12:26 AM:
 
Good looking hookers an hour's drive away from here too--and all perfectly legal. Which means they're too old for Richard.

Richard sounds like he likes his women like he likes his scotch:
thirteen years old and kept in the basement.
 

---

Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 07-17-2004, 12:44 AM:
 

quote: James B. Openshaw

---

I don't get those 14/16 numbers either, but the age of 14 for South Carolina somehow doesn't surprise me.

---

Ages on Chart:
Ages are shown on the chart in different ways. For instance

16 / 17 means that we have documentation to show that the age is 17, but we have unusual reasons for continuing to show 16 on the age chart.

17 means that we have documentation under the state or country name confirming that the age is the number shown in bold red.

17 means that we have documentation under the state or country name confirming that the age is the number shown in red but we are concerned about whether our interpretation is accurate.

16 means that we do not have any documentation but that we believe this to be the valid age. The age is in black.

16? means we do not have any support what-so-ever about the age and have located this information through un-supported emails or heresay. The age is in black and/or a question mark exists.

illegal means that this is illegal regardless of age
 

---

Posted by James B. Openshaw (Member # 1310) on 07-17-2004, 12:48 AM:
 
Thanks, Darryl.

Unusual reasons for 14 in South Carolina, still doesn't surprise me at all.
 

---

Posted by Pravin Ratnam (Member # 1417) on 07-17-2004, 01:44 AM:
 

quote: Paul Mayer

---

Good looking hookers an hour's drive away from here too--and all perfectly legal.

---

I hope the Cathouse show on HBO where they covered the Bunny Ranch was an exagerration. Those women didnt look so good and they cost way too much. 1000 bucks??? You could be a Marlon Brando and buy a whole village in some third world country with that money.

By the way, nothing to quote from this link. So no excerpts.
How to Find Montreal Ladies Who Are Man's Best Friends
 

---

Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 07-17-2004, 02:29 AM:
 
I am reminded of the joke ... Fat women are like mopeds. It's all fun until your friends see you.

Sodomy used to be illegal in Oklahoma, regardless of who was involved.
 

---

Posted by Stephanie M. Brosche (Member # 1982) on 07-17-2004, 03:55 AM:
 
Dan Lyons asks

quote: Dan Lyons

---

wow...can this thread get any creepier?

---

I'd say no, but then the thread continues...
 

---

Posted by Ryan Luby (Member # 2520) on 07-17-2004, 04:03 AM:
 
Wow, what a fantastic post to come back from vacation to.

Richard, you should document your sexcapade(s) with this lovely woman into a book and label it as a new weight-loss diet technique. If I had a stronger stomach I'd offer to edit and co-write.
Too bad the video didn't work out..you'd make the late Mr Atkins jealous.

--> --> -->
 

---

Posted by Nate Lehrke (Member # 1460) on 07-17-2004, 04:09 AM:
 
Ryan, that's the worst idea I have ever heard. Now I have to clean all the vomit off my monitor.
 

---

Posted by Ryan Luby (Member # 2520) on 07-17-2004, 04:18 AM:
 
Glad I'm not the only one.

Proof that my idea works, though.
 

---

Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 07-17-2004, 10:00 AM:
 
With a name like Greco he could sneak into Cuba and try the "clean and educated" hookers that Castro is promoting
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-17-2004, 01:29 PM:
 
Using one's brain is the highest calling but if one is forced to rely on physical labor to earn one's keep I'm not sure why being a ditchdigger is considered honorable work but being a whore, stripper, or porn performer is sleazy and horrible. Both exploit the person's body. What is it about sex that causes the rules that apply to every other aspect of behavior and society to be tossed out?
 

---

Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 07-17-2004, 02:36 PM:
 
Because sex feels good and ditch digging doesn't?
 

---

Posted by Kyle McEachern (Member # 2250) on 07-17-2004, 04:11 PM:
 

quote: Capt. Obvious to the rescue!

---

sex feels good

---

Damn! I must have been doing it wrong all this time.
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-17-2004, 04:50 PM:
 
It might not feel so good if you were doing it professionally. Just ask Phil.
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 05:26 PM:
 
Based on Steve's constant referrals to me, I guess he "thinks" he knows "me" and/or about what I do in life, or he's in love with me and in the closet. I'm NOT willing to bet on which option is most likely.

Much to his disappointment, I have to put an end to his constant drooling about all the fun things in life whether it be me or the work I do.

The ONLY thing I do "professionally" in that particular line of "work" is produce, direct, and film/tape.

I know he will be disappointed... but Hey! It pays very, very, VERY well and allows me much free time as well as the resources to do things I enjoy without some asshole boss yapping at me.

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 07-17-2004, 05:41 PM:
 
Is it just me, or is Phil trying to project a slightly less wild'n'crazy image lately?

I guess it's because he's a mod now.
 

---

Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 07-17-2004, 05:47 PM:
 
Most of you guys are insensitive assholes, that doesn't surprise me though considering how you're all men. That girl was obviously good enough for Richard when he was horny...and so what if her mom has diabetes??? What does that have to do with anything?

It's all good and easy to down on someone after you had sex with them but you were the one that was that DESPERATE to do it in the first place...
 

---

Posted by Thomas Procyk (Member # 1170) on 07-17-2004, 05:58 PM:
 
I'm surprised Utah isn't "Illegal-Illegal-Illegal"

=TMP=
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-17-2004, 05:59 PM:
 
I actually did her to try to get higher in the company since her mom was the GM. Ironically enough, I got fired soon after I stopped doing her.
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 06:05 PM:
 
Nah Mike... I've "found" Religion! I've been "saved"!

(YEAH RIGHT!) HA!

quote: Rachel Gilardi

---

Most of you guys are insensitive assholes, that doesn't surprise me though considering how you're all men.

---

quote:

---

A whore should be judged by the same criteria as other professionals offering services for pay -- such as dentists, lawyers, hairdressers, physicians, plumbers, etc. Is she professionally competent? Does she give good measure? Is she honest with her clients?

It is possible that the percentage of honest and competent whores is higher than that of plumbers and much higher than that of lawyers. And enormously higher than that of professors.

---

quote: Rachel Gilardi

---

It's all good and easy to down on someone after you had sex with them but you were the one that was that DESPERATE to do it in the first place...

---

quote: Manny Knowles

---

In the case of prostitution, the byproduct is money.

---

quote: Manny Knowles

---

We have sex for all sorts of reasons apart from how much "fun" it can sometimes be.

---

quote: James B. Openshaw

---

Geez, Richard. It appears that your 'plan' backfired and you were the one who was screwed.

---

That's why it is usually not a good idea to "dip your nib in the company ink."
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 06:29 PM:
 
Hahahaha... fair enough, Steve. I just couldn't resist my response.

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-17-2004, 07:13 PM:
 

 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-17-2004, 09:08 PM:
 
You know how there are some things you just don't want to know about your parents?

My family and I were in Wal-Mart today shopping and my dad told my little brother to go to the womens section and get my mom a bra. (As a joke). He went and came back asking what size. Sure enough, my mom said her size....36 D....OMG!!!! I didn't need to know that!!!!!
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 09:19 PM:
 
Then they all went to the games aisle and picked up the new Parker Brothers Family Game... "Incest".

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-17-2004, 09:24 PM:
 
You.....Scare......Me
Phil
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 09:27 PM:
 
I do? Perhaps you should look in the mirror and see the "you" that we all here see.

Go re-read your posts and topics... It seems to me that ALL of us should be VERY afraid... Ummmm... of you.

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-17-2004, 09:33 PM:
 
I'm already visualizing the duct tape over your mouth
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-17-2004, 09:34 PM:
 
36 D....OMG!!!! I didn't need to know that!!!!!

No, but maybe we did!

You must have had a very sheltered upbringing if you didn't already know that little factoid just from seeing them in the laundry etc.

Edit:
OK, now that I think about it I don't know my mother's size either...but I wouldn't be OMG about it.
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-17-2004, 09:38 PM:
 
Hmmm..there ya go Richard... just another example of to what I was referring.

OBTW: NOT in2 duct tape. If you want to talk whips and chains, handcuffs, ballgags, and leather... we can talk.

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 07-17-2004, 09:39 PM:
 
This just proves how much you like the other "other" white meat
 

---

Posted by Gracia L. Babbidge (Member # 582) on 07-17-2004, 09:45 PM:
 
One thing I've heard said is It's not who you know - it's who you blow!

Unless laws have been changed, oral sex is still illegal in 25 states.

I don't know which ones are the other 24, but I know that Maine is one of the 25.
Plenty of people disregard that law, and enjoy it - sometimes as much as the person on the receiving end.
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-18-2004, 01:02 AM:
 
Gracia, I guess you couldn't see the tee-vee while you were, um, down there but the Supreme Court overturned its own 1986 decision and struck down a Texas gay sodomy law last November and it's presumed that this is applies to straight couples as well. I believe Maine's law was changed back in 1976.

quote:

---

Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Posted: 11:00 AM EST (1600 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Thursday struck down a Texas state law banning private consensual sex between adults of the same sex in a decision gay rights groups hailed as historic.

The 6-3 decision by the court reverses course from a ruling 17 years ago that states could punish homosexuals for what such laws historically called deviant sex.

Legal analysts said the ruling enshrines for the first time a broad constitutional right to sexual privacy, and its impact would reach beyond Texas and 12 other states with similar sodomy laws applied against the gay and lesbian community, and into mainstream America.

"The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court's majority. "The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime."

As recently as 1960, every state had an anti-sodomy law, according to The Associated Press. In 37 states, the statutes have been repealed by lawmakers or blocked by state courts, the AP reported.

Of the 13 states with sodomy laws, four -- Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri -- prohibit oral and anal sex between same-sex couples. The other nine ban consensual sodomy for everyone: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia.

Thursday's ruling apparently invalidates those laws, as well. CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said the decision appeared to strike down most laws governing private sexual conduct, but he said laws governing marriage would be unaffected. (Full story)

Laws that might be most vulnerable would be ones that govern fornication and adultery, said Diana Hassel, associate professor of law at Roger Williams University.

And while Hassel said "only a handful" of states remain still have such laws, Thursday's Supreme Court ruling establishes a benchmark in privacy that had not existed.

Hassel said the ruling, based on due process arguments rather than equal protection laws, would push out new areas in privacy. "This is going to carve out protection for private sexual behavior," Hassel said. "As long as it's between consenting adults, this ruling would appear to cover it."

---

Full CNN article HERE

As a devotee of the fine art you may also find this of note:
http://www.sodomylaws.org/
 

---

Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 07-18-2004, 01:02 AM:
 
Richard's tells his dad who he has sex with. His mom tells all of Wal-Mart her bra size. Richard has his eyes on girls who are underage. Looks like their family gene pool could use a filter.
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-18-2004, 01:14 AM:
 
Oh quit ragging on the guy. "Underage" is an artificial concept of fairly recent origin. He's admiring fully developed women not undeveloped girls which means he is responding as nature intended.
 

---

Posted by Pravin Ratnam (Member # 1417) on 07-18-2004, 01:59 AM:
 
Hmm, maybe I can develop a sitcom for Richard Greco and KD as the Odd Couple and the name is not only because they are mismatched.
 

---

Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 07-18-2004, 05:27 AM:
 

quote: Bobby Henderson

---

The thing about this that makes me angry is how they turn it around to make it the other person's fault: "that's her problem that she got her heart broken."

---

quote:

---

But it is (their fault). People should be able to decide who they are going to bed with. If they want more than a casual encounter, then they should check the person they are exchanging body fluids with more closely.

---

quote: Michael Schaffer

---

Reminds me of an ex-girlfriend of mine who always complained that men are all assholes.

---

Most of us are assholes. We often take what we want without any regard to how it affects others. American culture glorifies this kind of thing to a very sickening extreme, especially when it comes to violent behavior.

And women can be predatory assholes too. I know I've been through some emotional hell over it. The women, at least in my part of the world, are becoming just like men. They hold the real purse strings on sexual power anyway. There's no such thing as a "perfect man," so lots of women take the salad bar approach and use several guys at once for a composite of that perfect fellow. So many women have tried to put me in "the friend zone" that it just pisses me off anymore. I already have enough close female friends, and the ones I have are either married or in committed relationships. The other so-called female friends just cock-block you from being able to meet a woman who actually wants to have something more to do with you than some phoney "friendship."
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-18-2004, 04:57 PM:
 
Somehow this seems appropriate here:




>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-18-2004, 05:02 PM:
 
So does this.



Mapquest
 

---

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 07-18-2004, 06:11 PM:
 
Those are both the same pic. Look at 'em! Neither of them have block numbers either. Must be hell for finding an address.[av=l]
 

---

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 07-18-2004, 06:12 PM:
 
While that particular pic has been around here and the inet for ages, I find the map link a nice touch!

Damn! Joe, your powers of observation NEVER ceases to amaze me!

>>> Phil
 

---

Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 07-18-2004, 09:13 PM:
 
The photo Steve uploaded may actually be real.

Phil's street sign photo looks obviously altered. For one thing, the correct font is not used and doesn't even match perspective correctly.

The lettering on the signs in Steve's photo use the correct FHWA Series C Gothic letter style, commonly in use on street signs. The lettering matches perspective as well as lighting. If this photo is an alteration, whoever did it did a damned good job at it. Another thing that can argue for Steve's photo being real is not all street name signs have block numbers on them.
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-18-2004, 09:24 PM:
 
Some of us deliver the goods...some of us are just poseurs!
 

---

Posted by Ron Yost (Member # 1850) on 07-18-2004, 10:55 PM:
 
I'm surprised Steve didn't find what I did with a little Google-ing .. very little, in fact.

His image IS real and it's located in Manhattan, NYC. But, you simply won't believe what yet another street one-block north is named! Truly a trifecta!

Klik below to find out (no pictures, tho):

Directions to Holy Trinity Church

I'm guessing that's probably Holy Trinity Church in the background of the pic. ??

Tooo funny!
Ron Yost
 

---

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 07-19-2004, 07:08 AM:
 
Dyckman intersects with Seaman?

Hmm...is F-T dead slow sometimes lately when posting?
 

---