Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Threads you wanted to start, but didn't.

This is topic Threads you wanted to start, but didn't. in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=003497

Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 08-17-2004, 08:01 PM:

Are there any threads that you wanted to start on F-T, but didnt for whatever reason? I was reading the "jealousy" thread and Tim said that there are a few members that he just cant stand, and that got me thinking..who doesnt he like? But for the same reason he didnt post the names, I didnt start the thread..so feelings wouldnt get hurt, or fights wouldnt break out. Theres really only one person I dont like, but I wont mention Phil's name. [evil]

So heres my unstarted thread: Who do you hate on Film-Tech?

Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-17-2004, 08:05 PM:

Honestly, that was going to be my answer.

But now it is "why do you hate Jeremy?" [Smile]

Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 08-17-2004, 08:09 PM:

one of the rules is not to degrade other members on the site that leads to an unwelcome environment. That would be one big reason not to mention names. My thread would be What threads you would like to lock if you could? Because some just have no point at times. [Smile]

Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 08-17-2004, 08:16 PM:

No reason to lock any threads unless they are duplicative. As long as the subject is reasonably descriptive (and that's a separate offense than simply starting the thread in the first place just like insulting posts are also a separate violation) then the non interested person need not read them.

Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-17-2004, 08:17 PM:

quote: Jeremy Fuentes
Theres really only one person I dont like, but I wont mention Phil's name...

Well, Jeremy, you gotta stand in line as there are of plenty people in that club... [Wink]

>>> Phil

Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 08-17-2004, 08:21 PM:

quote: Steve Kraus
No reason to lock any threads unless they are duplicative. As long as the subject is reasonably descriptive (and that's a separate offense than simply starting the thread in the first place just like insulting posts are also a separate violation) then the non interested person need not read them.

That's why I didn't make the thread because it would have been pointless because who really cares if a thread is pointless or not. They just float to the bottom of the forum thread pile. [Smile]

Posted by Paul Cassidy (Member # 951) on 08-17-2004, 08:22 PM:

Phil your always welcome in KIWI Land [beer]

Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-17-2004, 10:24 PM:

quote: Darryl Spicer
one of the rules is not to degrade other members on the site that leads to an unwelcome environment

Hence the reason why the political forum did not last.

Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 08-18-2004, 01:09 AM:

What was the worst thing you ever did to a piece of film?

I thought that would be a hilarious thread, but it could only be enabled by anonymous posting somewhere.

Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-18-2004, 01:26 AM:

I dunno, I have done some pretty bad things to old trailers, those are pieces of film.

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-18-2004, 06:36 PM:

Here are some great threads that never got started:

Are you the same gender now as when you were born?

Why my religion is better than yours

Reply here if you want to get BANNED

Why isn't hardcore porn innovative anymore?

What's your favorite disease?

Anyone else have a pet midget?

Post pics of your scabs that won't heal![av=m]

Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-18-2004, 08:27 PM:

how about a rash that wont go away?

Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-18-2004, 08:33 PM:

A rash on what?

Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-18-2004, 08:34 PM:

A rash on what? Need pics

Posted by Robert L. Fischer (Member # 2424) on 08-18-2004, 09:09 PM:

Female forum members, post your nude pictures here

But, in all seriousness, if you've got 'em, you can e-mail them to me. [thumbsup]

Posted by Tony Bandiera Jr (Member # 2365) on 08-19-2004, 01:00 AM:

Male Forum Members, post your "Member" pics here!! [Eek!]

But we all know what trouble that would cause, eh? [evil]

Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 08-19-2004, 06:56 AM:

quote: Chris Hipp
But now it is "why do you hate Jeremy?"

I knew this was coming... [fu]

Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 08-19-2004, 09:12 AM:

Anybody want to see my collection uf used splicing tape samples?

Posted by Jesse Skeen (Member # 586) on 08-19-2004, 01:46 PM:

Any female members wanna go out with me? [Big Grin]

I did sorta post the "Why isn't hardcore porn innovative anymore" thread a few years ago, it was called "When did XXX Theaters stop using film?"

Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-19-2004, 02:06 PM:

Jeez Jeremy, I said that like a week ago... [Razz]

Posted by Jason M Miller (Member # 2597) on 08-19-2004, 02:48 PM:

How about Projectionist that are over 350lbs and why that is? or better yet How to lose weight in the booth

Posted by Mike Olpin (Member # 1115) on 08-20-2004, 12:02 AM:

How fast can you PING Film-Tech?

PING www.film-tech.com 56 data bytes

--- www.film-tech.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 62.767/73.47/107.252 ms

Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 08-20-2004, 12:25 AM:

C:\Documents and Settings\doshea>ping www.film-tech.com

Pinging www.film-tech.com [66.98.220.11] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.98.220.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 66.98.220.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 66.98.220.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 66.98.220.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Ping statistics for 66.98.220.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 0% loss,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-20-2004, 04:31 AM:

To quote another FT member " [sleep]

Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 08-20-2004, 06:59 AM:

quote: William Hooper
What was the worst thing you ever did to a piece of film?

How about this? Close, anyway. [Wink]