This is topic Hurricane Katrina in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=004225
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-28-2005, 02:27 PM:
Just a quick note to wish those in Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi good luck for the coming hours, and especially those in New Orleans. The BBC radio news report at lunchtime speculated that the potential damage 'might stretch as far east as the Alabama port city of Mobile', so good luck to William; and (obviously) I hope it doesn't.
Posted by Steve Scott (Member # 630) on 08-28-2005, 02:34 PM:
From seemingly official NOAA site http://weather.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/iwszone?Sites=:laz062
URGENT - WEATHER MESSAGE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NEW ORLEANS LA
1011 AM CDT SUN AUG 28 2005
DEVASTATING DAMAGE EXPECTED
HURRICANE KATRINA
A MOST POWERFUL HURRICANE WITH UNPRECEDENTED
STRENGTH...RIVALING THE INTENSITY OF HURRICANE CAMILLE OF 1969.
MOST OF THE AREA WILL BE UNINHABITABLE FOR WEEKS...PERHAPS LONGER. AT
LEAST ONE HALF OF WELL CONSTRUCTED HOMES WILL HAVE ROOF AND WALL
FAILURE. ALL GABLED ROOFS WILL FAIL...LEAVING THOSE HOMES SEVERELY
DAMAGED OR DESTROYED.
THE MAJORITY OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WILL BECOME NON FUNCTIONAL.
PARTIAL TO COMPLETE WALL AND ROOF FAILURE IS EXPECTED. ALL WOOD
FRAMED LOW RISING APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESTROYED. CONCRETE
BLOCK LOW RISE APARTMENTS WILL SUSTAIN MAJOR DAMAGE...INCLUDING SOME
WALL AND ROOF FAILURE.
HIGH RISE OFFICE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL SWAY DANGEROUSLY...A
FEW TO THE POINT OF TOTAL COLLAPSE. ALL WINDOWS WILL BLOW OUT.
AIRBORNE DEBRIS WILL BE WIDESPREAD...AND MAY INCLUDE HEAVY ITEMS SUCH
AS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES AND EVEN LIGHT VEHICLES. SPORT UTILITY
VEHICLES AND LIGHT TRUCKS WILL BE MOVED. THE BLOWN DEBRIS WILL CREATE
ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTION. PERSONS...PETS...AND LIVESTOCK EXPOSED TO THE
WINDS WILL FACE CERTAIN DEATH IF STRUCK.
POWER OUTAGES WILL LAST FOR WEEKS...AS MOST POWER POLES WILL BE DOWN
AND TRANSFORMERS DESTROYED. WATER SHORTAGES WILL MAKE HUMAN SUFFERING
INCREDIBLE BY MODERN STANDARDS.
THE VAST MAJORITY OF NATIVE TREES WILL BE SNAPPED OR UPROOTED. ONLY
THE HEARTIEST WILL REMAIN STANDING...BUT BE TOTALLY DEFOLIATED. FEW
CROPS WILL REMAIN. LIVESTOCK LEFT EXPOSED TO THE WINDS WILL BE
KILLED.
AN INLAND HURRICANE WIND WARNING IS ISSUED WHEN SUSTAINED WINDS NEAR
HURRICANE FORCE...OR FREQUENT GUSTS AT OR ABOVE HURRICANE FORCE...ARE
CERTAIN WITHIN THE NEXT 12 TO 24 HOURS.
ONCE TROPICAL STORM AND HURRICANE FORCE WINDS ONSET...DO NOT VENTURE
OUTSIDE!
Conditions seem a bit unfavorable... I hope things don't get as biblically awful as this warning suggests.
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 08-28-2005, 02:44 PM:
last report has the winds in the wall of the eye exceeding 150kt's and the eyes central pressure has dropped to 906mb's The news stated that would make the storm the strongest in recorded history.
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-28-2005, 03:01 PM:
The worst part is that New Orleans is going to take a bath in this storm... LITERALLY! Most of the city is below sea level, behind levees. To top it all off, the hurricane is predicted to hit at high tide! Once the storm surge breaches the levees, New Orleans will flood!
My wife told me the storm was going to hit New Orleans this morning. My response was, "Oh Shit!" There's nothing that can be done but cross your fingers and pray for the best.
The city has been under evacuation since Friday. I hope that anybody reading this board who is in New Orleans will be able to "Get outta' Dodge!" If not, I understand that the designated "Safe Haven" for the area is the Super Dome. Just get your ass to the Dome and take cover.
We're all with you! Just hang in there!
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 08-28-2005, 03:47 PM:
there is a mandatory evacuation in process now for new orleans. central eye preasure is now down to 902mb's.
Posted by Allison Parsons (Member # 2728) on 08-28-2005, 04:26 PM:
As someone who's yearly vacation spot was knocked down from Hurrican Ivan, I wish the best of luck to anyone in then New Orleans area!!
So, I don't know the history of New Orleans, but will someone tell my why did someone think it would be a good idea to build a city BELOW sea level....right next to the ocean!? It still boggles my mind.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-28-2005, 07:00 PM:
Katrina and the waves are about to hit, but it sure ain't "walking on the sunshine."
The news coverage has been concentrated on New Orleans. But there are many smaller town and villages well to the south and southeast of the Big Easy. New Orleans faces a terrible situation. But anyone foolish enough to try to ride out this storm in towns like Grand Isle and Venice may face certain death. Many of those bayou towns are built on marsh land right on the coast or just a few miles inland. They have no shelter at all against the possible category 5 winds and storm surges as high as 30 feet.
When my father was stationed in New Orleans we often took fishing trips down to Grand Isle. I have some fond memories of that place and am pretty concerned it may get totally destroyed.
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-28-2005, 07:41 PM:
There's also the oil angle, lifted from MarketWatch
quote:
Katrina was bearing down on a region that produces about a quarter of U.S. domestic-oil production.
Royal Dutch Shell and other energy producers have already shut production facilities that produce close to half a million barrels of oil per day. Energy companies were evacuating oil rigs and platforms in the Gulf as well as onshore production facilities.
About one-sixth of the U.S. oil supply comes through facilities at Port Fourchon, La., near New Orleans, and any damage could send prices of oil and natural gas to record levels.
"Our priority right now is the safety of our employees and in securing our facilities," Shell spokeswoman Darci Sinclair said. Shell employs 4,000 workers in Louisiana, she added.
Posted by Wolff King Morrow (Member # 2226) on 08-28-2005, 08:04 PM:
I saw the mention about the oil shutdowns on the news. Get ready for even higher gas prices after the storm runs through...
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-28-2005, 09:09 PM:
Yeah, I just topped off the tank in my pickup truck this evening.
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-29-2005, 12:46 AM:
The way I understand it, a whole bunch of levees were built around New Orleans about 100 years ago. They worked to keep out the flood water. The problem is they worked TOO well!
New Orleans was at sea level at one time or, at least, a lot closer. Over the years, the levees back-filled with silt and debris from the floods. Every year, they were repaired. They got built higher and higher. The city now sits in a bowl shaped depression outlined by 100 years of piled up silt and back fill from where people have built up the levees.
Now, if they had left well enough alone 100 years ago, the city would periodically flood BUT the silt from the receeding waters would have kept the land nearly level. Furthermore, Lake Poncetrain and the surrounding bayous would act as a damper against flooding. The excess water would have flooded the swamps where it would have done relatively little damage.
This time, instead of acting like a buffer, the lake will act like a breaking dam. The floods will overfill Lake Poncetrain and it will spill over into the city. Then, the levees will begin to erode and eventually fail. When that happens, it's bath time.
The ironic part (If this isn't ironic enough!) is that there are pumping stations all around the city to keep the water out. However they are all electric powered. When the hurricane hits, the electricity is sure to go out. No electricity means no pumps.
The storm is sure to rip down all the power lines in its path. City authorities have a gambit to play: Do they cut power before the storm or do they leave it up until the storm takes it down? Taking out the power before hand saves possible damage and lives when the high tension lines hit the ground. It also leaves people without power that COULD have saved their lives. It's a hard call... No matter what you do, you're going to lose some lives because of it.
Hurricane Katrina is the third or fourth largest storm on record since records have been kept. It is the WORST thing to hit the Eastern U.S. coast since Hurricane Camile in 1969. The second worst since then was Hurricane Andrew that hit just recently.
In terms of destruction, I'm expecting this one to be as bad as the tsunami in Indonesia. The difference being that WE had advance warning. 150-200 MPH winds and record storm surges ON TOP OF high tide will literally be like the proverbial "Finger of God"! This one isn't going to just flood New Orleans and surrounding areas. It's going to change the geography of the Gulf of Mexico!
This is the kind of storm that we'll never really be able to tell how bad it was. Winds of 150 MPH will destroy the instruments used to measure them. The only thing we'll really have to measure it is sattellites and Doppler radar. However, even with all that technology, the BEST way to tell what the weather is like is to stick your head out the window and look. The only problem is that if you do, you're likely to get your head ripped off!
I know I'm talking about a worst-case scenario but, seriously, I think this is goig to be pretty bad no matter HOW you slice it!
This is one time when I hope I'm wrong!
Posted by Jeffry L. Johnson (Member # 453) on 08-29-2005, 08:11 AM:
Weather.com Hurricane Central quote:
The pressure dropped as low as 902 mb on Sunday afternoon but has since risen. The 902 mb pressure reading was the 4th lowest on record in the Atlantic Basin.
Hurricane Mitch Scroll down to Table 2.
Gilbert Sep 13, 1988 888 mb
Florida Keys Sep 3, 1935 892 mb
Allen Aug 7, 1980 899 mb
Mitch Oct 26, 1998 905 mb
Camille Aug 17, 1969 905 mb
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-29-2005, 02:37 PM:
CNN news report worth watching
Quicktime video
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-29-2005, 03:06 PM:
Meow! Snarl! Hiss!
If the latest BBC report is accurate, it looks like Katrina veered a little further north-east than first thought, and also lost some strength: with the result that the damage to New Orleans might not be as bad as the worst case scenario.
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 08-29-2005, 04:00 PM:
Gotta love small-market TV "talent".
Looks like Gulfport, MS may have taken a harder hit than New Orleans did.
I've been collecting the aviation weather reports and forecasts for the area since yesterday, for use in my upcoming weather class. The series of hourly reports for the New Orleans Lakefront Airport (KNEW) show how as the storm intensity increased, the automated measuring equipment started failing, leaving more and more gaps in the reporting with each passing hour, until the system or the power failed after the 1253Z observation.
The observations at the Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int'l Airport (KMSY) stopped much earlier at 0353Z, again probably due to power failure or perhaps the guys bailing out. There's been no terminal forecasts issued for the airport since 0600Z.
Keesler AFB (KBIX) stopped reporting after 1355Z and Gulfport-Biloxi Int'l Airport (KGPT) after 1025Z. They too missed their 1800Z terminal forecast.
Glad I wasn't there. Hope Bill Hooper and Jon Sharpe got out of there while the gettin' was good.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-29-2005, 04:46 PM:
I saw that CNN bit live and thought that wx guy was right on target. That rude bitch keep interupting while he was making a really good presentation of the facts.
Perhaps she gets paid per word?
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-29-2005, 05:11 PM:
It looked to me like something was going on off the screen: she decided that she had a score to settle (justified or otherwise), and he was grimly determined not to give her the satisfaction.
I'll leave the double entendre to Phil...
Posted by Wolff King Morrow (Member # 2226) on 08-29-2005, 05:14 PM:
I never watch Communist News Network, so I missed out on the blowup. Looked like quite the uncomfortable moment.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-29-2005, 09:09 PM:
Oh my Wolffie, CNN=Communist News Network? ...I'm shocked and dismayed!
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-29-2005, 11:44 PM:
On noes for Wolfie! Wolfie says "Communist News Network" which translates to "I voted for Bush" which means we know who you voted for President which = BANNED!
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-29-2005, 11:47 PM:
Hey Joe-boi! I thought ALL political comments were banned!
***YOU*** NEED to BAN yourself!
Posted by Jennifer Pan (Member # 2035) on 08-30-2005, 12:49 AM:
I second that notion.
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-30-2005, 02:30 AM:
He just got a little distracted by that red blouse the presenter was wearing; that's all.
...but just in case CNN is too moderate for Wolff's tastes, here's a real Communist news network...
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-30-2005, 06:31 AM:
quote:
On noes for Wolfie! Wolfie says "Communist News Network" which translates to "I voted for Bush" which means we know who you voted for President which = BANNED!
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-30-2005, 10:53 AM:
I can't be BANNED because you can not tell who I voted for President based on my comments. Brad sez we can say anything we want, just as long as he can't tell which party we tend to vote for by our comments. Read the FAQ!
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 08-30-2005, 12:06 PM:
I didnt vote, can I be banned for that?
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-30-2005, 03:00 PM:
Y'all a bunch o' whiners!
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 08-30-2005, 03:06 PM:
Brad where did you find my quarter?
I must have dropped it at the Martini Bar at Showest....back in 02'
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 08-30-2005, 07:22 PM:
I have to get serious here. I'm watching MS-NBC right now (Olbermann's show...a very good show, BTW). THey are showing footage from a helicopter trip over the damage in Mississippi. I'm seeing highways totally destroyed, casino boats lifted out of the water and deposited on hotels. I have never seen damage like this. Wow...Highway 90 is totally knocked off of its moorings...it is just gone.
New Orleans will take years to recover. Only the roofs of houses are visible. There have been suicides in the SuperDome. I can't imagine being in there with no air conditioning. And, the weather forecast tomorrow is for mid-90's! The smell must be horrific.
I'm a big weather geek, and I probably over follow these things. There has been a strange depression around Florida for a couple of weeks. It would come and go without warning. Then, last week it flared up and shot across Florida (With all of the Gulf Coast stuff, we haven't heard much of Florida).
I'm sitting under the remains of the hurricane right now. It's just about moved through. We've had about 2" of rain in the past 6 hours...certainly not a problem as our ground is dry. Could have been much worse here, but it shot through much faster than expected. Our original estimate was 7".
Now, New Orleans is being evacuated. I have no idea how they'll get all those people out of there with no electricity, water, or much else.
We're going to be dealing with this for a long time. My heart goes out to all the people there, and I wish only the best for Film-Tech'ers caught in this mess.
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-30-2005, 10:31 PM:
Hmmm... perhaps now they are regretting building New Orleans below sea level.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-30-2005, 11:27 PM:
They didn't build New Orleans below sea level, it just wound up that way for reasons previously described.
The north side of Lake Ponchatrain will eventually be the edge of the Gulf Coast for that part of Louisiana. The rest of it is going to disappear. That includes New Orleans.
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-31-2005, 02:32 AM:
The impression I get from the BBC reports (which may not be entirely accurate, given that they're relying on just one or two correspondents in the area) is that in the days leading up to Katrina making landfall, everyone was entirely focused on the likelihood of immediate storm damage to New Orleans and that the towns further east along the coast which ended up taking the brunt of it were working in the belief that they'd escape serious damage. The coverage I've seen also suggests that no-one was really expecting floods in New Orleans to start several hours after Katrina had passed, i.e. that if the levees were still intact after the eye had passed, the worst had been escaped.
Admittedly this was on a far smaller scale, but I do remember that when the 1987 'hurricane' hit the south-east of England, most of the deaths and injuries didn't happen during the night of the storm itself but in the days and weeks following it - trees that had been weakened by the storm falling on people; that sort of thing.
The victims of this storm are going to need help and support long after the TV crews have packed up and left town.
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-31-2005, 09:46 AM:
I was channel surfing last night and stopped on MS-NBC's excellent coverage. I saw that helicopter tour of the devastation. It was pretty amazing video, shocking actually. They let the camera do the talking, mimimal voiceover. Fox's coverage was abominable in comparison, talking heads, babbling news readers, flashy graphics all over the screen, just plain awful, at least what I saw last night.
I haven't heard anything about other nations offering to rush money, supplies or other assistance to us. Guess they must all be preoccupied with other things.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-31-2005, 09:53 AM:
The damage from flooding into New Orleans is making the damage suffered in S. Florida from Hurricane Andrew pale in comparison. The New Orleans area, as well as parts of Mississippi have been plunged into the dark ages. No power, no water, no sewage or trash removal.
Countless thousands of homes in the Big Easy are a total loss. That includes a good number of old, historic homes. Couple this with the fact a great deal of people had no flood insurance (in parts of Mississippi only 1 in 5 residents were insured). My early prediction is New Orleans may see at least 100,000 to 250,000 people leave that area, if not more.
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 08-31-2005, 10:48 AM:
quote: Bobby Henderson
They didn't build New Orleans below sea level, it just wound up that way for reasons previously described.
Unless the land is actually sinking, it had to be built below sea level. Sea level has certainly not risen 12 feet in the last 100 years. Perhaps it wasn't below lake level (which does not have to be the same as sea level) and the lake has risen but it had to have been below sea level when it was settled.
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 08-31-2005, 11:05 AM:
quote: David Stambaugh
I haven't heard anything about other nations offering to rush money, supplies or other assistance to us. Guess they must all be preoccupied with other things.
I haven't been able to catch much news for the last couple of days; the last I heard before today was that New Orleans was likely to miss the worst of it, but that two smaller towns would be badly hit. From what I've heard so far today that seems not to be the case; New Orleans itself does seem to have been very badly hit. I'll try to catch up on the news tonight. This looks far worse than anything the area has seen in the past.
I don't know if help *has* been offered, but it certainly *should* be, by all countries able to do so.
As if the last couple of days have not been bad enough there is news today that somewhere between 600 and 1000 people have been killed in a disaster in Baghdad. The accident hapened on a bridge over the Tigris; people were crushed or drowned.
I do hope that bad news doesn't come in threes.
My thoughts are with all those affected by the events in both countries.
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-31-2005, 11:10 AM:
quote: Bobby Henderson
They didn't build New Orleans below sea level, it just wound up that way for reasons previously described.
Uhhh, no. They built it below sea level unless you are insinuating that the entire city sank after it was built. They didn't need to build it right where they did. They knew that area was below sea level and thought that was cool. You could say "Twas a foolish man who built his house upon the sand." They built the city below sea level. They should have left well enough alone 100 years ago. Who needs a city right there anyway? They should have used their brains and built it elsewhere.
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-31-2005, 02:17 PM:
quote: Bobby Henderson
Couple this with the fact a great deal of people had no flood insurance (in parts of Mississippi only 1 in 5 residents were insured).
The figure of $25 billion which has been widely quoted in the media referred, if I'm remembering right, to insured losses. If that means that the actual economic damage, factoring in uninsured losses too, could potentially be three or four times that, it's going to mean a huge bill.
Agreed entirely with Bobby and Stephen - it's about time Kofi Annan announced UN help for the Gulf [of Mexico, not Persia] states. The US usually stumps up vastly more in international aid, both cash and manpower, than any other nation in response to natural disasters, the tsunami being the most recent example. I'm sure Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama would be very grateful for any helicopters, medical supplies and building materials the outside world could spare.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-31-2005, 05:22 PM:
quote: Lyle Romer
Unless the land is actually sinking, it had to be built below sea level.
quote: Joe Redifer
Uhhh, no. They built it below sea level unless you are insinuating that the entire city sank after it was built.
That is EXACTLY what I am insinuating. And really, it doesn't need to be insinuated, implied or whatever. It is a scientific fact. New Orleans has indeed sank anywhere from 6 to 12 feet or more in the decades following the containment of the Mississippi River.
The phenomenon is called subsidance. Ground water is constantly eating away underneath the city. The dry soil on top literally sinks down where previous eroded soil used to be. The pumps that were working had to be used very often to pump away rain water and water that seeped up through the ground.
The entire delta in Southern Louisiana was created by soil deposits left by the Mississippi River. By damming the river up with levees from Baton Rouge on down to the mouth of the river south of Venice, LA, that has interrupted the periodic flooding and beneficial soil depositing that should have been allowed to occur.
Marshlands throughout southeastern Louisiana are being eaten away by the salt water of the Gulf of Mexico. Before the levees were built, the Mississippi would regular overrun its boundaries and flush away salt water, put down more soil and allow the marshlands to flourish. We have exactly the reverse happening now.
Many thousands of people have seen this disaster coming. When I lived in New Orleans it was a popular topic of conversation. If the city got a significant rainfall it created lots of problems and got the conversation going. But in typical American fashion, we chose to be cheap and do little to nothing about the situation. Lots of business people even popped off comments like the problem didn't even exist. Well it sure exists now.
I wonder how NFL fans are going to adjust to the "San Antonio Saints"?
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-31-2005, 06:15 PM:
Still, my point remains that they were complete morons for building a city there. What dumb fucks. The city had to go eventually, I guess now is the time. Sucks for all of the people there, for sure. But honestly, twas foolish of the original "settlers" to build it there. In fact, I am having a hard time even comprehending such stupidity. Did Jack Valenti decide to put the city there? If so, then it would make sense because a decision that stupid would fit right in with Jack's complete lack of rationality.
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 08-31-2005, 07:03 PM:
Did the original settlers know about the sea level business when they settled the area? Was that sort of technology/level of thinking around in that era or did they just say "Hey this looks like a kickass place to build a house".
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-31-2005, 07:21 PM:
And now people are too emtionally attached to the place to even consider nixing the city and relocating elsewhere. Like has been said previously in this thread, it's not exactly a surprise here. Bit no.. we'll rebuild on the same spot and keep the city like the bunch o' morons we be.
Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 08-31-2005, 07:59 PM:
The moron part of the equation is factored in the wrong place. Holland has been reclaiming "below " sea level land for hundreds of years by the use of windmills for pumping. The silt accumilation caused by the Mississippi has been happening for 100 years since the start of the use of leeves to protect the city. New Orleans is the transit point of much of the food crops we sell for export that is transported down the Mississippi and is in the center of 25% of the fuel delivery for parts of the USA. Leeves need constant mantinence to insure integrity.....it appears some real federal morons cut the leeve
funds in the past two years; a situation which has not been done since 1964....the estimated $11,000,000 that was diverted for other dubious uses will now be repaid in the multiple billions and an estimate of hundreds if not thousands of lives lost in these decisions. I have a large family in Lousiana but they are safe in Baton Rouge. New Orleans is and was an endangered city that requires a balanced apprasal due to the importance of the location. There are other endangered locations; Miami is considered one of them.
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 08-31-2005, 11:01 PM:
quote: Joe Redifer
And now people are too emtionally attached to the place to even consider nixing the city and relocating elsewhere. Like has been said previously in this thread, it's not exactly a surprise here. Bit no.. we'll rebuild on the same spot and keep the city like the bunch o' morons we be.
Joe, you make it sound as if the city was built in the last 50 years. New Orleans is infact a very old, and historic city, dating back to the time that France held the land (pre Lousiana purchase).
People live where their jobs are.
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-31-2005, 11:35 PM:
Yes, New Orleans has always been pretty much below sea level but it wasn't as FAR below sea level until humans started tinkering around.
Then levees were built and pumps started pumping out water. Buildings were built and the general flow of natural water in and out of the delta was interrupted.
By a combination of natural and man-made processes, the areas in the middle of New Orleans started to sink and the areas around the edges got built up.
The event that just occurred was simply Mother Nature saying, "It's time to fill up the middle and flatten out the edges.
What kind of a bone head would build a city in a place like that? Well, New Orleans was originally settled by French people. That about answers it right there. Doesn't it?
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 09-01-2005, 04:58 AM:
...and you guys bought it from them!
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-01-2005, 06:39 AM:
It's nice to get a couple hours' break.
I dunno what to tell you, it's astounding. Folks must look at the pictures of damage of MS on TV & think they're seeing the same area, but all the way across MS' coastal construction, houses, etc. is literally sawdust. For miles in after that it's just shredded, into central MS.
New Orleans & coastal LA have their own destruction profile due to flood the peculiar flood pathology there, but as folks who are familiar with hurricanes know the spread to the east of the eye is the meat grinder. It extended to Pensacloa, FL, destroying concrete tresteled state highways, etc.
I've seen photos of homes after hurricanes in other low areas with water up to or past the 1st floor windows & a caption of "submerged homes", but in the outlying areas of New Orlean (up to sizeable Slidell, LA, etc.) there are aerial photos of blocks of houses *actually* submerged, looking like Monopoly houses at the bottom of a pool.
Mobile had heavy damage but it's a major metro area closest in to MS, & it's becoming a staging area with parking lots of malls, shopping centers, etc. filliing with equipment trying to get west into MS & refugees who were trying to go back & can go no further.
Joe Redifer is trying to do triage on a gag that failed out becuase the setup was wrong: New Orleans was not built below sea level. The levees were built to stave off water from floods of the MS river & lake Pontchartrain, but the result over time is that they created channels diverting the silt which maintains the coastline. As a result subsidence occurred, & the area began to slowly move below sea level. The best now is to try to divert that type of schematic gag to port & coastal cities should not be built or inhabited.
There's an ironic picture taken in Mobile during the storm at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lumis/38580827/
It would likely have been taken about 9am, because the water got much higher. A TV station got a feed during the storm from the Alabama Department of Transportation cameras (which I didn't now existed) mounted on buildings in downtown Mobile until they failed; the shot I saw was of about 14' of water with windblown whitecaps running solidly about 10' apart through downtown Mobile. It didn't look choppy, it looked like a whitewater river.
The refugee situation is monstrous. The outpoor from hugely populated New Orleans is mindboggling, but the displacement of the homeless from the lower half of MS is flooding everything around with people: people are being evacuated from the Superdome in NOLA to the Astrodome in TX, Memphis TN is starting to strain, Mobile & Alabama further north are clogging with people.
Leo got a good overview of some of the public pre-storm perception, the MS folks did not understand how bad it would be if the storm hit New Orleans. MS EMA & the media fell down in getting people to evacuate, RIGHT AFTER Ivan which hit Gulf Shores AL but ground Pensacola & even more easterly FL communities for hours befored & during Ivan to a flattened disaster area. MS EMA in (I think) Harrison county swam out from their buliding in life preservers during the storm, a damning comedwown from Camille when they made sure people got out.
Can't contact folks via cell phone for the most part if they had MS or LA area codes, even if they evacuated. Just yesterday afternoon I got hold of some NOLA folks on cell phone who had evacuated to Gonzales, LA & then to Beaumont, TX. Communications are practically impossible, except for satellite phones.
My brother is in Miami & told me right after Katrina went through there that Richard Fowler did NOTHING to stop this hurricane, thinking only of himself by putting masking tape X's over the lenses of his spectacles. My disappointment in Richard Fowler is a little high right now.
A TV truck got through to someplace in MS Wednesday & shot back a community that is literally dying of thirst: National Guard had not yet got in, if water distribution points had been setup they didn't know because all local radio & TV are down & MS EMA was so screwed that they either had nothing for them or didn't get the info to AL broadcasters to put on the air so the MS residents could get it. And AL radio & TV have been SCREAMING to MS EMA to get them emergency info. Yesterday afternoon, some Biloxi MS radio got back up, but I think they're just re-transmitting a TV feed from MS somewhere via a tuner at the xmtr site.
As for what's going on in NOLA, flyover & surviving mass media that was in place before the storm is all you get. The only route in not obliterated is now through Baton Rouge LA, & NOLA is locked down to everyone except emergency services anyway. What trickles in is horrifying.
On & on. Haven't heard from too many people.
Posted by Jennifer Pan (Member # 2035) on 09-01-2005, 09:26 AM:
Damn... I've been really out of the loop... I don't watch TV... and to hear about this from here... then to see the gas prices shoot up... Jeez...
Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 09-01-2005, 09:53 AM:
I have been through many hurricanes in Florida and the Caribbean and switched to shatterproof eyeglasses years ago
Category one for Miami should of not caused so much damage to power and telephone in our region. Rapid growth and cost cutting on upgrades and maintinence was obvious. We had a snapped transmission line pole to our office which ripped out our power riser and meter panels off the building...we had been waiting for two years for the pole to be replaced. The emergency power crews from Mississippi where great....sad what they have in store when they go home.
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-01-2005, 03:22 PM:
Is it unreasonable to expect our federal government to just call, I don't know, Greyhound, and say "We need EVERY available bus in New Orleans right now." And where are the Army troop transports, the school buses from neighboring towns, etc? And why bus them all the way to Houston? Is there no train track between the two cities? Bus them to a train station, and load up a few trains full of people and get them moving somewhere. If not Houston, somewhere else - anywhere else.
Why was I continually looking at busses sitting parked in front of the Super Dome this morning? I don't want to hear about traffic jams tying up the busses. Clear the fuckin highway and get those things in gear. A few gun shots go off, and the whole process comes to a halt. Huh? Get the fuckin process moving already! This is embarassing.
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-01-2005, 04:21 PM:
Btw, what moron fires a gun at someone in a helicopter who's trying to rescue you? I wouldn't go in after someone like that, either. The ignorant bastards.
The question that should be asked is not, 'where are the rescuers,' but, 'why didn't they evacuate, when they had DAYS to do so?' A category 5 hurricane is bearing down on you, you live 12 ft. below sea level, and you don't consider LEAVING when a mandatory evacuation is ordered?! I know there are unfortunates and those who cannot help themselves, but realize that many of the people whining today are probably the same people who were on the news the other day saying, "We gonna ride it out. Ivf Goahd want us to die, den we gonna die."
Posted by Joseph L. Kleiman (Member # 3097) on 09-01-2005, 04:50 PM:
In the midst of all the turmoil, debris, shooting and looting, NPR reports the following:
quote:
R&B legend Fats Domino was missing Thursday, days after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, according to his long-time agent Al Embry. Embry told The Associated Press that he hadn't been able to contact the 77-year-old Domino since talking to him Sunday evening by phone. Domino had told Embry that he planned to stay at his house in New Orleans' low-lying 9th Ward with his wife, Rosemary, and their daughter.
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 09-01-2005, 08:46 PM:
Fats Domino Rescued
quote:
(CNN) -- Rock 'n' roll pioneer Fats Domino was among the thousands of New Orleans residents plucked from rising floodwaters, his daughter said Thursday.
Karen Domino White, who lives in New Jersey, identified her father in a picture taken Monday night by a New Orleans Times-Picayune photographer.
The photograph shows Domino -- the singer behind the 1950s hits "Ain't That a Shame" and "Blueberry Hill" -- being helped off a boat near his home in the city's Lower 9th Ward.
His whereabouts since the rescue were not immediately known. Nor was there any information about his wife, Rosemary, friends said.
The neighborhood was heavily flooded when a levee failed as Katrina slammed into southeastern Louisiana and the Mississippi Gulf Coast.
Thousands are feared dead in the storm, Louisiana's governor and the mayor of New Orleans have said, though no official tally has been compiled.
White said she last heard from her father August 23, four days before the storm hit, and was unable to contact him Sunday.
"I didn't have any information. I was just praying," she said.
Writer Charles Amann said he last spoke to Domino on Sunday, and the singer refused to join the evacuation that was then under way.
"He said to me, in that wonderful Southern accent of his, that no, he was staying on -- that he had gone through the last one and he could go through this one," said Amann, who is working on a book on the early days of the "American Bandstand" television program.
Many of those evacuated from the Lower 9th Ward were taken to the Louisiana Superdome and are being transferred to the Astrodome sports stadium in Houston, Texas.
Alan Warner, an EMI Music executive, also saw the photograph of Domino's rescue. But he said he did not know where the 77-year-old singer, born Antoine Domino, was taken afterward.
"But the fact that he actually was rescued is just so gratifying," Warner said.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-01-2005, 11:20 PM:
quote: David Stambaugh
I haven't heard anything about other nations offering to rush money, supplies or other assistance to us. Guess they must all be preoccupied with other things.
Several nations have offered assistance - most notibily our European allies, the members of the OAS, Russia, and Japan. I beleive China offered assistance as well. I don't know how the people in NO would react to foriegn troops assisting with the evacuations, and, with the situation, I don't know if putting foriegn troops on the ground would do anything but cause a field day in the press when one of them had to shoot someone.
quote: Mark J. Marshall
Is it unreasonable to expect our federal government to just call, I don't know, Greyhound, and say "We need EVERY available bus in New Orleans right now." And where are the Army troop transports, the school buses from neighboring towns, etc? And why bus them all the way to Houston? Is there no train track between the two cities? Bus them to a train station, and load up a few trains full of people and get them moving somewhere. If not Houston, somewhere else - anywhere else.
Realize Mark, a great deal of the train tracks, trains, busses, Search and Rescue choppers, militart equipment, etc in the area were damaged or destroyed by Katrina. Last I heard, there was still an air force base down in that area that was offline and unabel to be reached by radio. Its easy to say "lets to this" or "lets do that" but logistically, some of these things take time and there was very little warning to prepare. I would think that the reason they are taking them to houston is that a lot of other cities in the area are having issues of their own and Houston is willing to absorb that many refugees.
quote: Tim Reed
Btw, what moron fires a gun at someone in a helicopter who's trying to rescue you? I wouldn't go in after someone like that, either. The ignorant bastards.
At that point, the military should just start escorting the Blackhawks with gunships..
quote:
The question that should be asked is not, 'where are the rescuers,' but, 'why didn't they evacuate, when they had DAYS to do so?' A category 5 hurricane is bearing down on you, you live 12 ft. below sea level, and you don't consider LEAVING when a mandatory evacuation is ordered?!
The way I understood it, there was less than 24 hours notice and the highwyas leading out of town were traveling at all of 5 miles per hour.
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 09-02-2005, 01:36 AM:
I saw the governor or senator from one of those states on CNN today and he was saying how he waso n the tv daily before the hurricane struck, begging people to get out of town, so there was more than 24 hrs notice.
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-02-2005, 10:20 AM:
Canada yesterday offered any assistance required including military (peacekeepers) and have relief supplies ready but the offer was turned down for the moment
According to todays news all military services were put on a readiness alert if assistance is required
Ontario Hydro has offered our emergancy cres to get power lines back up
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 09-02-2005, 10:49 AM:
The Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) is organizing to help rewash and dry any irreplacable film footage that has been flooded:
Here's what to do with wet film:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/technical/storage_room.jhtml?id=0.1.4.11.12.10&lc=en#water
quote:
Water Damage
Another hazard for film that can significantly shorten its life is water from floods, fire fighting, burst pipes, leaky roofs, or other such sources. (And yet, if it wasn't for water, the film could not have been processed.) You can keep water damage to a minimum through quick salvage actions. Since very few motion picture laboratories offer film cleaning services for water(and mud ) damaged film, a salvage job is usually a do it yourself project as mentioned in the following steps and requires manual skill, patience, and a lot of improvising.
1. Keep the roll of film wet. If the film dries, the convolutions may be stuck together, ruining the film. For holding wet or muddy films prior to the cleaning operation, immerse the roll completely in containers of cold water, below 18°C (65°F). The cold water will help prevent both swelling and softening of the emulsion, which are the major causes of damage.
2. With the roll completely submerged underwater, gently rub the edges of the film to remove most of the mud and silt. Make frequent water changes.
3. Unwind the wet film carefully and slowly. Pass the strand of film under running water to remove any remaining mud or silt. In extreme cases, a gentle scrubbing action with a cotton swab may be needed to remove stubborn particles. Be careful in swabbing the film because the wet emulsion is very susceptible to physical damage. From the running water, pass the film through a tank containing water and a laundry or dishwater type of water softening solution to minimize spotting. Avoid any sudden temperature changes in the wash waters.
4. Drape the film carefully on a wash line to air dry. Try to keep the drying area dust free and avoid any surface contact to the wet emulsion side of the film. When the film is dry, clean and lubricate it by hand with a suitable film cleaner, as you wind it onto a reel. The ideal way to recondition water damaged film would be to have it go through a normal motion picture processing machine while using the proper solutions for the particular damaged films. One of the companies that restores or rejuvenates films may be able to help you.
Kodak offers "Disaster Recovery" services for users of Kodak microfilm products:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/dpq/site/TKX/name/sellSheetDisasterRecovery
quote:
Protect your information. And your bottom line.
Prepare for the worst by using our best--KODAK Microfilm. Even today, microfilm continues to be a low-cost, low-risk method of managing information and financial transactions and is the media of choice for secure, information storage. But are you prepared if something happens to your microfilm and you need to restore your images? If you use KODAK Microfilm, and meet all program requirements, you're protected--thanks to our unique Disaster Recovery Program. In most cases, we can rescue and restore your damaged film --absolutely free of charge.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-02-2005, 01:40 PM:
Unfortnately much of the poulation in New Orleans is USED to living on welfare and expects to be catered to and alwaya is looking for a handout, its a way of life down there that has gone on way too long. Hence there are a large number of folks that DON'T know how to do anything for themselves at all, so they loot, shoot, and steal what ever thay can. They are not smart enough to know that very likely they will never be able to use the TV that they just took. Now on the other hand. If it takes stealing food and water to survine you've got to do what you've got to do, but stealing merchandise like TV sets and shooting at rescuers is something that is going to take the military to control. Unfortunately with folks like that which have no values and don't even know how to comprehend to value an education let alone get one imposing martial law is ust about necessary. Of course we SHOULD blame our Government and the State of Lousiana for the breaching of the levees AND the oil companies for locating so many critical refineries in an area of that high a risk. There is simply no excuse for the flooding to have even happened on this scale and it DIDN't have to and wouldn't have happened if there were wise folk in the Government.
Mark
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-02-2005, 03:25 PM:
Mark said "if there were wise folk in the Government."
that has as much probablity of happening as finding "military intelligence"
Those who can can those who can't become politicians
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-02-2005, 04:24 PM:
I was watching a clip of the New Orleans' mayor whining and crying on how the federal and LA state government have not done anything/enough to help that city. What an asshole!
He's blaming EVERYONE ELSE for HIS mismanagement of this whole sad situation and HIS (and his predecessor's) lack of disaster planning and emergency contingencies for a cataclysmic disaster that would ultimately come.
They have known for years that the city is prone to hurricanes AND FLOODS and should have planned ahead instead of yapping and passing the buck. The responsibility for the chaos, deaths, and civil disorder rests SOLELY on HIM and his administration!
"Fail to plan, plan to fail"
As far as the looters, that's a real hard call in this extraordinary and unprecedented situation. My 1st thought and inclination is to shoot them on sight... which I would do without hesitation IF they came on MY property.
However, one does have to cut them some slack ***IF*** they are looting stores and stealing food (which would go bad anyway) to survive. Even those that are taking shelves of food and electronics and Nike shoes may be taking them to "bargain" for food later. But, how can ya tell? It's impossible! (I am in NO way defending the looters...just commenting on the situation.)
But, there is NO excuse for those thugs running ramped that are shooting, raping (even kids), and beating-up people. Those ***assholes*** should be shot and killed on sight, and permanently taken out of the gene pool. Let their sorry asses float in the flood waters along with all the ***innocents*** that have died. I sincerely feel sorry for the "good" people and citizens that, by no choice of their own, have to endure this devastating disaster. Their/our government has failed them AND US!
Just MY 2-cents... It's a F*UCKING good thing I ain't "in charge"!
Flame off.
Posted by Jeremy Jorgenson (Member # 2989) on 09-02-2005, 04:38 PM:
Phil, if you run, I'll vote for you
quote: Joe Redifer
Brad sez we can say anything we want, just as long as he can't tell which party we tend to vote for by our comments.
... um ... no matter which party your run for.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-02-2005, 05:43 PM:
Gee Jeremy, politically I'm an independent. NO particular political affiliation and no one can tell for whom I vote for since I do not kiss and tell in politics nor in sex.
And while I did throw-in my hat to run for the Governor of California in this last election, I bowed out as I had more pressing obligations and ultimately Arnold became the Governator.
The *ONLY* "party" I run for is at the local clubs...
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-02-2005, 08:46 PM:
quote: Phil Hill
They have known for years that the city is prone to hurricanes AND FLOODS and should have planned ahead instead of yapping and passing the buck.
Actually Phil I heard from a reliable local source that LA. had 70 million in finding pulled from Levy maintenance and upgrades by Congress last year although I can't confirm that.... Perhaps someone else here might know more about that. It seems to me that the responsibility HAS to be more accountable on a national level than on the state level. Heck there should have been two sets of Levees .... a double set somewhat like the dikes that keep the ocean out of the Netherlands. Over there I believe that they have a system of three dikes. In LA. better maintenance of the Levees alone would probably have kept the town from flooding on the scale that it did but there would still have been some (minor in comparison) flooding from the surge alone.
I can't wait to see what actor they get to portray the mayor in the upcomming Bruckheimer film disaster version...... Eddie Murphey comes to mind... he's certainly stupid enough and the part would fit him like a glove!
Mark
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-02-2005, 09:07 PM:
I heard that too, Mark. But what was failed to be conveyed by the local politicians to the people is that while they got "some" $$$ from congress for the dike projects, they failed to mention the shortfall and lead all the citizens to believe that all was well and OK. They wanted to appear like they were doing something so THEY would be re-elected and/or to kept their phony-baloney jobs!
NOW they all are in the cover-their-ass mode. How sad for the people.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-02-2005, 09:11 PM:
Yea, I wish someone would go shoot that iddiot Mayor in the ass
so we don't have to listen to him. Perhaps they'll do that in the film version
. We have a mayor here in SLC that has got to be his relative
.
The other thing they need to do is to FORCE those poor(and stupid) people to go to school in return for their welfare checks, if they can't at least speak clear english when they come out of school then no more welfare check
. And don't anyone hand me that local dialect crap, there is a big difference between the several local dialects and plain knowing how to speak.
Mark
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-02-2005, 10:18 PM:
As the governor of LA and the mayor of NO scream and point fingers at the feds, a few questions have come to mind.
1) Why was the mandaroy evacuation of NO voluntary?
2) Why was the city of NO not utilizing buses to evacuate people without cars? After all, they could have used these buses:

3) Why were the interstates leaving NO kept in a 2 way configuration for most of the evacuation? Traffic would have moved much faster having 6 lanes, rather then leave the 3 incomming lanes empty.
4) Why did they tells tens of thousands of people to take refuge in the Superdome yet, with the 24 hours advance notice they had, it did not occur to anyone to supply the superdome with food and water?
5) Why did the mayor of NO blame FEMA for not securing his city? FEMA is not a law enforcement agency. Why were officers not told to keep control sooner?
Really, those two just need to pipe down. With the destruction of roads, bridges, rail, and a signifigant amount of the vehicles in the area, it will take time to reach the city. The "victims" shooting at rescue helicopters, trying to steal weapons from Guardsmen, and playing sniper outside a firestation - pinning down 50 firemen - do not help the situation.
When you look at the situation there - 6 homicides in 3 days among the 20,000 at the superdome (not to mention untold numbers of rapes and assaults) - attacks on rescuers - and "victims" throwing away MREs and then complaining to reporters about not liking the food - you really have to ask what the hell is wrong with those people?
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-02-2005, 11:47 PM:
Mark:
quote:
The other thing they need to do is to FORCE those poor(and stupid) people to go to school in return for their welfare checks,
What does this have to do with anything that is happening?
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 09-03-2005, 12:13 AM:
One thing that has to be considered: Rescue crews, aid workers and news media have only begun to be able to get into the city.
Think about the old axiom that says if you hire more police crime rates will go UP before they go down. This is because the new police officers are uncovering crimes that used to go unreported.
The same thing is going to happen in the hurricane areas. As recuers, aid workers and media make their way into the city more and more death and destruction will be uncovered that previously went unseen.
This does NOT account for the fact that there has been a delay in getting aid to the disaster areas. The people trapped without food, water, clothing and shelter are going to be in a bad situation until help arrives. As time goes on, things will get worse for them.
But you still have to remember that that section of the Gulf Coast have simply been FUCKED UP. It is GOING to get worse before it gets better. The more people that make it INTO the areas, the more of the destruction that will be unveiled. Some things will get better with time. Some things will get worse before they get better.
This does not diminish the fact that things are bad... VERY bad. This does not diminish the fact that things that COULD have been done haven't been done.
However, it will APPEAR that, overall, things are getting worse than they really are. We simply need to keep that perspective in mind as we think about the state of things on the Gulf Coast.
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 09-03-2005, 12:29 AM:
I'm not all that opposed to leaving New Orleans under water with the way the animals have been acting down there.
Sure, you can be extreemly upset about not having food, water, medical attention, but how in the WORLD to you justify the breakdown of general decency. There's nothing that can explain the homicides, rapes, brutal attacks etc. that have been happening down there.
Its in the face of advercity that the true face of a society will reveal itself, and New Orleans has revealed itself here. New York has a reputation of being a cold, brutal, city, how ever, one has to consider the grace in which that city has handled 9/11, the black outs, etc in recent memory.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-03-2005, 05:17 AM:
quote: Jeremy Fuentes
What does this have to do with anything that is happening?
Oh common Jeremy, If the government had over the years been educating those folk down there they would all have been smart enough to be able to help themselves, they would have all had cars and they would have all gotten out. Sure there are always a few and the dis-abled granted but in N.O. you have about 700,000 disabled stupid folk that are used to getting a handout every month. Its obvious their Mayor also fits well into this catagory for not utilizing those school busses!! Dum stupid iddiot!
quote: Jason Burroughs
but how in the WORLD to you justify the breakdown of general decency.
Thats easy....
You have ALOT of people there that don't know HOW to appreciate anything because they have NO values, heck they don't even know what the words VALUE or decency mean or how to properly pronounce them. Remember they have a LIMITED vocabulary to begin with.... If you received a free handout all your life would you appreciate anything?
Mark
Posted by Anslem Rayburn (Member # 1267) on 09-03-2005, 05:23 AM:
quote: Jim Ziegler
Why did the mayor of NO blame FEMA for not securing his city? FEMA is not a law enforcement agency. Why were officers not told to keep control sooner?
As I understand it, law enforcement in the area was sent on rescue missions, trying to help the stranded people in the city. They were pulled from that and assigned to control the crime when it became apparent that a significant minority of the population were bent on harming others.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-03-2005, 10:10 AM:
quote: Anslem Rayburn
They were pulled from that and assigned to control the crime when it became apparent that a significant minority of the population were bent on harming others.
Yea, and then half of them turned in their badges and ran! Scared they were going to get their weenies blown off. After that many fire departments literally penned themselves in their stations to keep the thugs out and could'nt leave to put out the fires.
At 5 am I saw watched a teary interview with the police chief... asking no less for them to bring in a cruise ship so he and his officers could have a little comfort...... This guy is right up there with the Mayor! Better get each a nice new Lazy-Boy!
Mark
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 09-03-2005, 01:49 PM:
quote: Leo Enticknap
Agreed entirely with Bobby and Stephen - it's about time Kofi Annan announced UN help for the Gulf [of Mexico, not Persia] states.
And I have a sneaky suspicion it would be rejected outright by some people even before the ships or planes ever arrived at their respective staging points. Intercity New Orleans would probably accept the initial shipments, then let the rest rot on the docks because it "didn't meet our expectation". Some poor whites out in rural Mississippi would reject the aide simply because it indeed came from the United Nations. For them it would be a patriotic gesture to go hungry. Mark Gulbrandsen is right about everything he said about that part of our nation.
quote: Jim Ziegler
I don't know how the people in NO would react to foriegn troops assisting with the evacuations, and, with the situation, I don't know if putting foriegn troops on the ground would do anything but cause a field day in the press when one of them had to shoot someone.
We'll never see foreign troops in New Orleans, or any other devastated American city for that matter, since it seriously calls into question our own sovereignty and probably violates some Federal statute somewhere in 230 years of American law. Americans will unite to help out other nations with good will or organized troops, but I don't think we'd look to kindly on having other soldiers on our own soil. And as Jim suggests, could you imagine the fall out when Jim Bob or John Boy shots one simply because he looked like somebody who "knocked down MY World Trade Center".
quote: Phil Hill
He's blaming EVERYONE ELSE for HIS mismanagement of this whole sad situation and HIS (and his predecessor's) lack of disaster planning and emergency contingencies for a cataclysmic disaster that would ultimately come.
Which is why if I was Al Quida, the "dream still lives and the hope will never die", that they could ultimately destroy this country. How long until the news sluts pick that up and run with it. NEVER!
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 09-03-2005, 02:11 PM:
As I live a long way from you folks I dont get your mainstream news coverage, but have been watching that that is available to me, which includes live pictures 24/7 from downtown NO, police and other radio coverage, really quite a lot of real information, unfiltered and ofen unopinionated, all since the night before Katrina. When Katrina was downgraded to a four just before landfall I went to bed, complacent in the thought that this would be just another blow that will disturb a few shingles and traffic signs. How wrong that turned out to be...
I've also been watching forum and discussions, mainly between Americans, about NO and the aftermath, and it has been an enlightening, and often disturbing experience.
I'm gonna quote this BBC News article
At the end of an unforgettable week, one broadcaster on Friday bitterly encapsulated the sense of burning shame and anger that many American citizens are feeling.
The only difference between the chaos of New Orleans and a Third World disaster operation, he said, was that a foreign dictator would have responded better.
It has been a profoundly shocking experience for many across this vast country who, for the large part, believe the home-spun myth about the invulnerability of the American Dream.
The party in power in Washington is always happy to convey the impression of 50 states moving forward together in social and economic harmony towards a bigger and better America.
That is what presidential campaigning is all about.
But what the devastating consequences of Katrina have shown - along with the response to it - is that for too long now, the fabric of this complex and overstretched country, especially in states like Louisiana and Mississippi, has been neglected and ignored.
Borrowed time
The fitting metaphors relating to the New Orleans debacle are almost too numerous to mention.
First there was an extraordinary complacency, mixed together with what seemed like over-reaction, before the storm.
A genuinely heroic mayor orders a total evacuation of the city the day before Katrina arrives, knowing that for decades now, New Orleans has been living on borrowed time.
The National Guard and federal emergency personnel stay tucked up at home.
The havoc of Katrina had been predicted countless times on a local and federal level - even to the point where it was acknowledged that tens of thousands of the poorest residents would not be able to leave the city in advance.
No official plan was ever put in place for them.
Abandoned to the elements
The famous levees that were breached could have been strengthened and raised at what now seems like a trifling cost of a few billion dollars.
The Bush administration, together with Congress, cut the budgets for flood protection and army engineers, while local politicians failed to generate any enthusiasm for local tax increases.
New Orleans partied-on just hoping for the best, abandoned by anyone in national authority who could have put the money into really protecting the city.
Meanwhile, the poorest were similarly abandoned, as the horrifying images and stories from the Superdome and Convention Center prove.
The truth was simple and apparent to all. If journalists were there with cameras beaming the suffering live across America, where were the officers and troops?
The neglect that meant it took five days to get water, food, and medical care to thousands of mainly orderly African-American citizens desperately sheltering in huge downtown buildings of their native city, has been going on historically, for as long as the inadequate levees have been there.
Divided city
I should make a confession at this point: I have been to New Orleans on assignment three times in as many years, and I was smitten by the Big Easy, with its unique charms and temperament.
But behind the elegant intoxicants of the French Quarter, it was clearly a city grotesquely divided on several levels. It has twice the national average poverty rate.
The government approach to such deprivation looked more like thoughtless containment than anything else.
The nightly shootings and drugs-related homicides of recent years pointed to a small but vicious culture of largely black-on-black crime that everyone knew existed, but no-one seemed to have any real answers for.
Again, no-one wanted to pick up the bill or deal with the realities of race relations in the 21st Century.
Too often in the so-called "New South", they still look positively 19th Century.
"Shoot the looters" is good rhetoric, but no lasting solution.
Uneasy paradox
It is astonishing to me that so many Americans seem shocked by the existence of such concentrated poverty and social neglect in their own country.
In the workout room of the condo where I am currently staying in the affluent LA neighbourhood of Santa Monica, an executive and his personal trainer ignored the anguished television reports blaring above their heads on Friday evening.
Either they did not care, or it was somehow too painful to discuss.
When President Bush told "Good Morning America" on Thursday morning that nobody could have "anticipated" the breach of the New Orleans levees, it pointed to not only a remote leader in denial, but a whole political class.
The uneasy paradox which so many live with in this country - of being first-and-foremost rugged individuals, out to plunder what they can and paying as little tax as they can get away with, while at the same time believing that America is a robust, model society - has reached a crisis point this week.
Will there be real investment, or just more buck-passing between federal agencies and states?
The country has to choose whether it wants to rebuild the levees and destroyed communities, with no expense spared for the future - or once again brush off that responsibility, and blame the other guy.
Just some other stuff - yep, the budget cut, from memory its $71.2m.
There was a mandatory evacuation, but of course, being America, you still have some freedoms, so mandatory isn't actually mandatory, just advice. Unlike, for example, Cuba, where a mandatory evacuation is exactly that.
Foreign aid was offered from more than two dozen countries, Rice said thanks, yes, we'll accept it all, but Bush said no, we can do this. Even useful stuff like the German portable clean water extractors were turned down. The Russians got a no thanks too.
There are some heros - A kid stole a bus and drove a hundred people to safety and it looks like he's in real trouble.
There are some strange things, like the boss of FEMA has no actual experience of disaster management, which you would have to assume contributed to FEMAs response... Apparently FEMA have been modelling this scenario for over a decade, you would have thought they would be right up in there.
Heres the long version of the Interview with Mayor Nagin. You might have a case for bad mouthing him for stuff occuring before the event, but not anything he's done thereafter.
My real problem is that I've seen the West Wing. I know how it works. Bartlet sees bad stuff happen on CNN, tells Leo to fix it, and CJ tells us its gonna be Ok, The Prez is on the case. Being The Prez gives you access to those kinds of resources and power. Yet there is no evidence that anything actually happened.
But there is evidence that the USA will accept some aid - gasoline. All the countries of the IEA are going to send you gas, ready refined gas. Keep on drivin' folks...
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-03-2005, 06:12 PM:
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Yea, and then half of them turned in their badges and ran! Scared they were going to get their weenies blown off. After that many fire departments literally penned themselves in their stations to keep the thugs out and could'nt leave to put out the fires.
The NOPD (hmmm... NO PD.. it fits) has been one of the most corrupt departments in the nation. If I recall correctly, they were under Federal oversight for a while. Its clear that there is a leadership problem in that department and the city would have been wise, long ago, to gut it and start over.
quote:
At 5 am I saw watched a teary interview with the police chief... asking no less for them to bring in a cruise ship so he and his officers could have a little comfort...... This guy is right up there with the Mayor! Better get each a nice new Lazy-Boy!
I have heard interviews with both the mayor and the police chief. They think that the way to solve the crisis is to scream and finger point. All they manage to do is make it harder for federal and state agencies to work with them.
quote: Aaron Mehocic
Intercity New Orleans would probably accept the initial shipments, then let the rest rot on the docks because it "didn't meet our expectation".
Some woman who was being interviewed on Fox (I believe), was complaining that she didnt have any food for 4 days and then threw away the MRE she was given because she didn't like it.
quote: Aaron Mehocic
We'll never see foreign troops in New Orleans, or any other devastated American city for that matter, since it seriously calls into question our own sovereignty and probably violates some Federal statute somewhere in 230 years of American law.
It is not unusual for foriegn troops to be on US soil (most at US training facilities, but a few years back the German Air Force had a squadron here for a while for something or other). Honestly, I would not see it as any violation of our soverengty, any more than our European allies would view the presance of our troops. I would not bring in forieng peacekeepers for the sole reason as I would not want to expose an ally to the grief when one of their troops has to defend themselves and shoot an american.
I did hear on the news last night the Canada was sending police officers to assist in some areas though. Also, other nations do have specialists and supplies as well.
quote: David Buckley
The only difference between the chaos of New Orleans and a Third World disaster operation, he said, was that a foreign dictator would have responded better.
Foriegn dictatior do not have to worry about Federalism or Possie Commitatus - both of which limit the President's use of federal power and troops. Federal agencies can do little until a state formally requests it, and active duty federal troops can do very little in the way of domestic law enforcement. National Guard units are under the control of Governors in this situation and are *supposted* to be for disaster relief - not law enforcement.
quote: David Buckley
genuinely heroic mayor orders a total evacuation of the city the day before Katrina arrives, knowing that for decades now, New Orleans has been living on borrowed time.
The mayor could have done much more to prepare the city for this and minimize loss of life. The city did *NOTHING* to evacuate people who could not leave the city on their own - and then this mayor has the gall to point at Bush and say its all his fault. America is not a nanny state. Local governments and citizens are expected to do what they can to care for their own needs.
quote: David Buckley
The National Guard and federal emergency personnel stay tucked up at home.
The National Guard is under state control (besides, deploying them before the storm would have rendered those units largely incapable of performing their mission). FEMA and federal troops can do little until the state requests it, but, again, prepositioning units and equipment would have resulted in destroyed equipment and ineffective units). Areas that were reachable - like Biloxi and Gulfport - saw assistance quickly. NO was much harder to reach due to the destruction or flooding of bridges, roads and rail lines.
It takes time to mobilize Guardsman as well - they are not active duty troops on a base - and time to get ships, aricraft, and vehicles together and deployed.
quote: David Buckley
The havoc of Katrina had been predicted countless times on a local and federal level - even to the point where it was acknowledged that tens of thousands of the poorest residents would not be able to leave the city in advance.
Unfortunately, there are many disasters for which there is no effective planning - many for which there is really nothing that can be done. For example - the largest earthquake in the US (well above 9.0) took place on the New Madrid fault in Missouri - before there was much of a population in the middle of the nation. If such an event were to happen today the damage would be more than anyone can imagine. People have tried to do planning for this event. Their conclusion was, basically, if it happens, we're screwed.
quote: David Buckley
The famous levees that were breached could have been strengthened and raised at what now seems like a trifling cost of a few billion dollars.
The Bush administration, together with Congress, cut the budgets for flood protection and army engineers, while local politicians failed to generate any enthusiasm for local tax increases.
The reports I heard on this was that the project would have taken $14 billion and 25 years to complete. Bush has not been in office 25 years, so, you can't point the finger of blame at him. During the Clintion administration many flood control progjects were cut by Clintion because his view, which is correct in my opinion, is that flood control was largely the responsibiliy of state and local governments.
quote: David Buckley
New Orleans partied-on just hoping for the best, abandoned by anyone in national authority who could have put the money into really protecting the city.
There are MANY places that need this or that or the other thing. However, there is not an infinite amount of money in the Federal Treasury.
quote: David Buckley
Meanwhile, the poorest were similarly abandoned, as the horrifying images and stories from the Superdome and Convention Center prove.
Which, again, begs the question, why did the mayor not try to get these people out or at least have the shelters provisioned with supplies?
quote: David Buckley
The truth was simple and apparent to all. If journalists were there with cameras beaming the suffering live across America, where were the officers and troops?
From day one they were plucking people off rooftops. It is much easier to fly in a couple dozen journalits with their networks helicopters than to mobilize adn transport thousands of troops.
quote: David Buckley
The nightly shootings and drugs-related homicides of recent years pointed to a small but vicious culture of largely black-on-black crime that everyone knew existed, but no-one seemed to have any real answers for.
Seems like this is an issue for the mayor and the police chief, if they can find time to get away from the front of the cameras.
quote: David Buckley
When President Bush told "Good Morning America" on Thursday morning that nobody could have "anticipated" the breach of the New Orleans levees, it pointed to not only a remote leader in denial, but a whole political class.
I don't think anyone in power, from the mayor on up, actually expected that levy to break. After all, the storm had lost power and took a swing to the east - everyone thought NO was going to dodge the bullet.
quote: David Buckley
The country has to choose whether it wants to rebuild the levees and destroyed communities, with no expense spared for the future - or once again brush off that responsibility, and blame the other guy.
I am for option three as expoused by the Speaker of the House - DON'T rebuild the lowlying areas. To do so would be stupid.
quote: David Buckley
There was a mandatory evacuation, but of course, being America, you still have some freedoms, so mandatory isn't actually mandatory, just advice. Unlike, for example, Cuba, where a mandatory evacuation is exactly that.
I have ZERO sympathy for those who had the means to evacuate and chose to stay. They chose their own fate and their choice is now straining the rescue efforts to get those who did not have a choice out. For those that could not get out on their own, why did the city make no effort to get them out?
quote: David Buckley
Foreign aid was offered from more than two dozen countries, Rice said thanks, yes, we'll accept it all, but Bush said no, we can do this. Even useful stuff like the German portable clean water extractors were turned down. The Russians got a no thanks too.
Lots of forieng aid has been accepted. Realize that some countries have offered things that at this point we do not need (Russia, if I recall correctly, offered peacekeeping troops, which would not have been deployable until well after the situation was secured)
quote: David Buckley
There are some heros - A kid stole a bus and drove a hundred people to safety and it looks like he's in real trouble.
No one is going to prosecute this kid for anything...
quote: David Buckley
There are some strange things, like the boss of FEMA has no actual experience of disaster management, which you would have to assume contributed to FEMAs response... Apparently FEMA have been modelling this scenario for over a decade, you would have thought they would be right up in there.
I can't speak to the resume of the head of FEMA, but, agency heads are typically beureucratic posts - which means frequently they are more administrators than anything. SecState Rice has no experience as a diplomat, either. Additionally, FEMA has a ton of things to prepare for nationwide - from earthqueakes on the west coast, to freak ice storms in the north, to hurricanes up and down the east coast, to terrorist attacks, tornadoes, volcanoes, etc... New Orleans is one city out of hundreds in the US.
quote: David Buckley
You might have a case for bad mouthing him for stuff occuring before the event, but not anything he's done thereafter.
All he's done after is run his mouth...
quote: David Buckley
My real problem is that I've seen the West Wing. I know how it works. Bartlet sees bad stuff happen on CNN, tells Leo to fix it, and CJ tells us its gonna be Ok, The Prez is on the case. Being The Prez gives you access to those kinds of resources and power. Yet there is no evidence that anything actually happened.
Real life is different than TV. The President is limited in what he can do directly without a specific request from the state - i.e. he cannot depoly federal troops without a request from the governor (unless, as happened in the sixties, he is deploying federal troops to force the governor to follow federal law). This, traditonally, is the responsibility of the Guard. While it is true that some units are on deployment overseas, there are other Guard units in LA as well - but - deploying them takes time.
quote: David Buckley
But there is evidence that the USA will accept some aid - gasoline. All the countries of the IEA are going to send you gas, ready refined gas. Keep on drivin' folks...
So, you want us to all quit our jobs and stay home?
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-03-2005, 06:22 PM:
Gosh, it looks like David sez ***WAY*** more dumbass stuff than I do...
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-03-2005, 07:40 PM:
David's post consists mainly of a quote from a BBC Online article. While, IMHO, BBC journalism has many strengths - the speed at which its correspondents can get news out of problematic situations, and the high level of factual accuracy in that news being the main ones - it also has weaknesses. I don't want to point this thread into dangerous ground, so all I'll say is that one often repeated criticism of BBC news reporting is its left of centre political outlook. I'm simply saying that this criticism exists - not offering an opinion as to whether or not I think it's justified.
If what I'm reading, watching and hearing some 4,500 miles from the disaster zone is right, there are questions that need to be asked about why it took the best part of a week for the authorities to understand the scale of the disaster, given that there was a forewarning. But that's for future enquiries and, possibly, elections - surely the priority now must be to evacuate the remaining refugees, work out how to provide a home and a chance to to earn a living for them in the coming months, and then get New Orleans drained and repairs underway.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-03-2005, 07:47 PM:
There definately needs to be a major after action review of this, as mistakes have been made, stuff has been over looked, etc. But, to be fair, no one has ever had to deal with the evacuation of a city of this size.
Any examination needs to move beyond fault finding and needs to focus on what changes need to be made to allow things to move faster (for example, it is being reported now that some guard units from other states were delayed 24-48 hours because of questions regarding the legality of sending in Guard troops from other states for law enforcement activites).
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-03-2005, 07:51 PM:
Oh OK Leo... I'll add the POS BBC to my post...
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-03-2005, 08:13 PM:
Nevada's Task Force One being one of those. They've been cooped up in a Dallas hotel for the last couple of days waiting for FEMA to let them into the disaster area. This after driving for 31 hours straight from 'Vegas in convoy earlier in the week. So much for quick response.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-03-2005, 08:19 PM:
What is Task Force One Paul? Did FEMA say why they were being delayed?
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 09-03-2005, 08:29 PM:
The experts in dealing with disasters like this are always the people watching it on TV on the other side of the country, or the world. DAMN! They're never at the site of the disaster where we really need them. The poor bastards actually dealing with the problem and who are expected to fix it NOW are ALWAYS incompetent.
(where's the sarcasm smiley?)
Last night on FOX Geraldo and Shepherd (sp?) Smith were covering the story in a mostly hysterical manner, especially Geraldo, shouting and sweating and holding a baby etc. What happened to reporting the news, rather than being the news? This was followed by other commentators claiming "Things are getting better today". I'm so confused.
If you have this many people in a 95-degree 100% humidity environment who are now homeless, with no food, no water, no sanitation, no air conditioning, no transportation, and they're surrounded by sewage and dead bodies, and nobody appears to be in charge, this is what you get. Doesn't matter much if it's New Orleans or Seattle.
I made the largest cash donation I could afford to the Red Cross. Though I'm sure someone will jump in now to tell me I'm a fool because the money will just be used to pad the bank account of some Red Cross official.
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-03-2005, 08:39 PM:
Nevada Task Force 1
Don't know any more at this point. They rolled out of here in a big hurry expecting to be given their destination and assignment while enroute. Channel 8 News has two of their people riding along and reporting as they go. It's been very frustrating for everyone--the reporters don't have a story to report on and the firefighters don't have anything to do except try to stay sharp. Pictures from the hotel show several other fire & rescue crews from SoCal in the same boat.
The hotel has an anime and comic convention going on as well. Some of the pics of the firefighters' reactions to the various cosplayers are pretty funny.
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-03-2005, 08:48 PM:
quote: Paul Mayer
They've been cooped up in a Dallas hotel for the last couple of days waiting for FEMA to let them into the disaster area.
Oft times unsolicited "help" contributes to the confusion and drains resources of those that are "in charge" and trying to get a handle on the situation. Until someone coordinates physical help and donated supplies, help can best be provided by cash contributions to legitimate causes.
Like Dave, I too sent cash to 5 different agencies.
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 09-03-2005, 10:59 PM:
Thanks Leo for setting the record straight, and to Phil for encouragement (as ever).
(Edit: For a sure cure for Phil's low blood pressure, try this article, which is rather more extreme: German Minister's remarks irk USA )
And Jim, the IEA, and gas, the world has an interest in what happens to GoM ops post Katrina, it spells potential big trouble, rather more so than whether you have a job or not:
IEA news reported via Yahoo
BERLIN (Reuters) - The head of the West's energy watchdog said in an interview on Saturday that Hurricane Katrina could spark a worldwide energy crisis if damage to U.S. refineries led to a big increase in U.S. purchases of European petrol.
"If the crisis affects oil products then it's a worldwide crisis. No one should think this will be limited to the United States," Claude Mandil, head of the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA) told German daily Die Welt.
"They [by which he means the US]are already buying gasoline in Europe. If the refineries are damaged, that will only increase. Then this will become a worldwide crisis very quickly."
Mandil told the paper that high oil prices represented a risk for global economic growth and urged consumers to alter their behavior to save more energy and limit the fallout.
Poor countries were bound to suffer most from a recent surge in energy prices, which has been aggravated by Katrina and the shortages it has caused, he said.
On Friday, the IEA launched a rescue plan to ease those shortages, saying its 26 members would release two million barrels per day of oil over a 30-day period.
U.S. gasoline prices have spiked by nearly a fifth over the past week, pushing up fuel prices around the world.
Sorry about bringing up the old gas issue here, but it is the dominant issue of our time...
But, there is a serious response to your question. How much can you afford to pay for gas before you will not be able to afford to drive to work, and thus you wont have a job? That time will come...
Posted by Kyle McEachern (Member # 2250) on 09-03-2005, 11:35 PM:
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Thats easy....
You have ALOT of people there that don't know HOW to appreciate anything because they have NO values, heck they don't even know what the words VALUE or decency mean or how to properly pronounce them. Remember they have a LIMITED vocabulary to begin with.... If you received a free handout all your life would you appreciate anything?
Yeah! Goddamn them for coming from an area of poverty! What the hell were they thinking, living in an area where they weren't able to get a good education, even if the government wanted them to! Let's make fun of them and say "Ha ha! You died because you're stupid! Sucks for you, you greedy welfare-getting bastards! Oh yeah, and not only are you dumb, but you're incapable of human decency and how to speak properly because you talk differently than I do!"
Seriously, what the hell are you doing making a comment like that about people who are DYING and suffering from INJURY and DISEASE and LOSS OF EVERYTHING THEY OWN...AS YOU TYPE YOUR A**HOLE REMARKS? I don't think there's any situation in which I'll understand the thought process there.
Just...wow.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-04-2005, 12:12 AM:
quote: David Buckley
(Edit: For a sure cure for Phil's low blood pressure, try this article, which is rather more extreme: German Minister's remarks irk USA )
Someone should remind the German minister that 60 years ago we were saving the world from his country.. He should also be reminded for a better part of the last 60 years, we were saving his country's sorry ass from the Soviets... I hope his comments are the final straw and we withdrawl ALL U.S. Military from Germany - and then make similar comments when their economy recesses...
quote: David Buckley
But, there is a serious response to your question. How much can you afford to pay for gas before you will not be able to afford to drive to work, and thus you wont have a job? That time will come...
So you are suggesting I quit my job now before I can't afford to have it anymore? To answer your question, at least $10/gal... I burn about 2 gallons going to work an back each day, so, for me, its more annoying than anything right now.. (To answer any preemtive questions - there is no public transport between where I live and my theatre, and I can't live in the same town as my theatre because all the apartment complexs are either full or low income - I have looked around here several times).
quote:
Yeah! Goddamn them for coming from an area of poverty! What the hell were they thinking, living in an area where they weren't able to get a good education, even if the government wanted them to! Let's make fun of them and say "Ha ha! You died because you're stupid! Sucks for you, you greedy welfare-getting bastards! Oh yeah, and not only are you dumb, but you're incapable of human decency and how to speak properly because you talk differently than I do!"
Two words Kyle - personal responsibility. It is not the states responsibility to make sure your life is peachy. If you choose to work and better your lot in life you can - if you want to be lazy, then it won't happen.
quote: Kyle McEachern
Seriously, what the hell are you doing making a comment like that about people who are DYING and suffering from INJURY and DISEASE and LOSS OF EVERYTHING THEY OWN...
Don't forget looting, raping, shooting at rescue choppers, shooting at police, shooting at firemen, breaking into hospitals looking for oxycotan, and trying to take M-16s from Guardsmen..
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-04-2005, 06:19 AM:
quote: Jim Ziegler
I hope his comments are the final straw and we withdrawl ALL U.S. Military from Germany - and then make similar comments when their economy recesses...
It already has, and big time. The German economy is almost into deflation territory, with virtually zero economic growth and unemployment at 12% and rising. If what I'm reading is in any way accurate, Gerhard Schröder's government (in which Jürgen Trittin is a minister) is being held responsible for this by a large proportion of the electorate. There is a general election coming in just over a fortnight's time, which the centre-right Christian Democrat party, led by Angela Merkel, is widely expected to win. Therefore I think it would be safe to speculate that Trittin's rant can be seen as a crude electioneering stunt. Opposition to the Iraq war is about the one and only policy of the Schröder government which has any significant public support in Germany, which I guess is why Trittin is attacking the US government.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-04-2005, 06:41 AM:
It does seem like France and Germany take any chance they get to try and take a stab at the US. I find it interesting that they are criticizing US economic and environmental policy when the US economy is night and day stronger than theirs.. On a positive note, the collapse of the German economy is, historically, prelude to an invastion of France.
Seriosuly, I find it annoying that, with everything that has happend in the past, and all the nations we have gone to the wall to help, that there is only a handful of nations that the US can always rely on to have our back (the UK being one of those nations).
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-04-2005, 07:49 AM:
quote: Kyle McEachern
Seriously, what the hell are you doing making a comment like that about people who are DYING and suffering from INJURY and DISEASE and LOSS OF EVERYTHING THEY OWN...AS YOU TYPE YOUR A**HOLE REMARKS? I don't think there's any situation in which I'll understand the thought process there.
Just...wow.
Kyle,
You need to go air out your ****ing brain!! After you have spent as much time as I have in that area...N.O., and Mobile then your comment which would be very different from the one above might be able to stand on its own two feet. There are alot of wonderful-responsible people down there but there are also ***ALOT*** of rats!
quote: Jim Ziegler
Two words Kyle - personal responsibility. It is not the states responsibility to make sure your life is peachy. If you choose to work and better your lot in life you can - if you want to be lazy, then it won't happen.
EXACTLY
but Kyle is apparently oblivious to this sort of lifestyle
Don't forget Kyle that the N.O. area is the largest single receipient of Welfare checks, has the MOST corrupt government of ANY city in the U.S., hence those people didn't buy their belongings... they got them free of charge and for many, many years.... Its obvious Kyle that you have not taken on the RESPONSIBILITY to KNOW what REALLY goes on in this country.
Indeed, this N.O.'s flood has definately flushed out the real rats down there.... And perhaps in a few other areas that aren't even close by as well.
Mark
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 09-04-2005, 09:59 AM:
Never mind, my comments were not helpful, so I deleted them.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-04-2005, 12:05 PM:
I would agree with Mark that New Orleans does have more than its fair share of "rats".
My sympathies are with the elderly and disabled folks who had no way of leaving the New Orleans area. I don't have quite the same level for all the able bodied folks that stayed. With all the warning that was given, and the still vivid memories of the Tsumani disaster in SE Asia just a few months ago, making a decision to stay in the area was very foolhardy.
Still, what's done is done and hopefully the National Guard, FEMA, Red Cross and everyone else who can help will get all these people the help they need.
My biggest hope is that this disaster in New Orleans may teach a lot of us a lesson about what can happen. Our grasp on "civilization" is a very tenuous grasp. It teeters on a balance all the time. The mistake all the poor, uneducated folks made was just taking that civilization for granted.
My father talked about how the Army and Marines were able to evacuate 1 million people from Saigon. But there was a key difference. The U.S. military simply gave those folks in Saigon a clear warning. Many walked out of that city on foot. They didn't wait for a bus to drive them out of the area.
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-04-2005, 12:47 PM:
quote: Jim Ziegler
It does seem like France and Germany take any chance they get to try and take a stab at the US. I find it interesting that they are criticizing US economic and environmental policy when the US economy is night and day stronger than theirs.
To deflect attention from their own problems, probably. If you're being held responsible for having caused a mess, a classic tactic is to try and hold someone else responsible for causing an even bigger one.
quote: The Sunday Times (today)
Schröder will play US card in TV duel
Justin Sparks, Celle, Lower Saxony
GERMANY’S election reaches a decisive stage tonight with a television debate in which Chancellor Gerhard Schröder will accuse Angela Merkel, his conservative challenger, of being too close to Washington and of having a hidden agenda to undermine the welfare state.
Schröder, whose opposition to the Iraq war helped him to a narrow re-election win in 2002, is expected to play the anti-American card again, depicting Merkel as a closet “neoconservative” like those around President George W Bush.
He may also seek to portray her as a German Margaret Thatcher bent on introducing radical economic reforms that would cut workers’ rights and reduce welfare benefits.
An estimated 20m people — a third of voters — are expected to watch the debate, seen as a last chance for Schröder, a polished television performer, to close his Christian Democrat rival’s commanding double-digit lead in the run-up to voting on September 18.
Preparations for the 90- minute encounter — the candidates’ only one-to-one confrontation of the campaign — have been characterised by wrangling over everything from the position of their podiums to camera angles.
Much of the chancellor’s fire will be directed not at Merkel herself, however, but at Paul Kirchhof, a relatively unknown university professor she wants as her finance minister. Kirchhof was catapulted to the centre of the campaign in July after making radical proposals to sweep away Germany’s highly complex tax system and replace it with a simple 25% flat tax. Last week, he dropped another bombshell by arguing for the privatisation of Germany’s generous state pension system.
Although applauded by economists, such ideas have alarmed many voters and have been rejected by some senior members of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU).
Merkel has been evasive about whether the ideas, which are not in the party programme, will be implemented if she wins — allowing Schröder to suggest she is not being entirely honest. “Kirchof is the German arm of the American neocons . . . who were also responsible for the Iraq war,” said Michael Müller, the vice-chairman of Schröder’s Social Democratic party (SDP) last week. “Kirchhof is a byword for the total dismantling of the social state.”
The chancellor gave a foretaste of the tactics he is likely to use in tonight’s debate at a rally in Celle, in his home state of Lower Saxony, on Friday night, when he dismissed Kirchhof as the “Merkel whisperer”. “We have to fight to keep Merkel and her eccentric professor at bay,” he told an enthusiastic crowd. “She says she wants to try out her ideas — I say, you can’t turn our nation into a laboratory for experimental tests on animals.”
The Schröder camp’s hopes of a post-debate “bounce” have been raised by polls suggesting the SDP, stuck for weeks at around 30%, has risen to 32%, even though the CDU still commands 43%. The chancellor will take some comfort from the commanding lead in personal popularity he enjoys over Merkel. “This election will be decided in the last few days of the campaign,” said Peter Struck, the defence minister and confidant of the chancellor, in an interview. “Schröder is better than Merkel and the TV duel will kick-start a new, intense phase in our campaign.”
It emerged last week that Merkel has been coached by Alexander Niemetz, a former television news reader. He is believed to have advised her to slow her machinegun delivery, use softer hand actions and, most importantly, smile but avoid her trademark grin. “She can’t compete with Schröder’s charm factor and shouldn’t aim to be liked more than him,” said Jürgen Falter, a prominent political commentator. “But the chancellor has nothing to offer but fear of what she’s planning, so she needs to make clear that she’s the only one with answers.”
Although tonight’s clash is the sole “duel” between the candidates, it was announced last week they would share a stage with other party leaders on September 12. The one-to-one debate is seen as their critical encounter, however, and the minutiae of its arrangements were still being hammered out up to the last moment.
Schröder will be asked the first question, but Merkel will have the last word, and two of the four journalists asking the questions will be women. It has also been agreed the 10 cameras will show the candidates only from the front and side — and not the back. Merkel will be relieved: she has revealed that she is uncomfortable with her “frumpy” figure.
THE UNDECIDED
When Dieter Siebert watches Angela Merkel take on Gerhard Schröder in tonight’s television debate, he will be one of up to 30m voters thought still not to have made up their minds, writes Justin Sparks.
Like many Germans, Siebert, a 59-year-old nurse, is convinced his country needs a new government but fears Merkel might introduce changes that would make life too painful. “I’m worried she might turn into the German version of Margaret Thatcher,” he said.
Rival candidates should heed the opinions of Siebert and others like him in Celle, a town in Schröder’s home state of Lower Saxony. For the past quarter of a century they have always voted for the winning party.
A panel of undecided voters convened by The Sunday Times suggested many did not know what Merkel stood for. Sebastian Bierman, 32, a lawyer, was concerned that she would not be able to stand up to more experienced leaders such as Tony Blair. “Whether you like him or not Schröder has the guts to put our interests before Washington,” he said.
But support for Schröder was waning at the Schweine-Schulze, his favourite bar. The landlord said: “He’s one of us and we trust him, but the feeling is that his party is not with him.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-04-2005, 03:31 PM:
quote:
“I’m worried she might turn into the German version of Margaret Thatcher,” he said.
They should be so lucky...
quote:
Sebastian Bierman, 32, a lawyer, was concerned that she would not be able to stand up to more experienced leaders such as Tony Blair. “Whether you like him or not Schröder has the guts to put our interests before Washington,” he said.
Something tells me Washington has stopped returning his phone calls...
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-04-2005, 03:40 PM:
quote: Bobby Henderson
My sympathies are with the elderly and disabled folks who had no way of leaving the New Orleans area.
Exactly Bobby and well put! Leaving these folks behind is plainly the fault of the mayor of N.O. and the gpvernment of the state of LA,. They had at least 48 hours notice to get em out of there.
Mark
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-04-2005, 04:47 PM:
The possible next catastrophic area in the US is the San Andreas Fault in California. If that ever went, California would be split in half, creating a new island.
True, be always prepared and heed warnings since we have no power over Mother Nature.
-Monte
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-04-2005, 05:25 PM:
Oh boy, here we go again...
IF you would take the time to learn about the San Andreas fault, you would know that fault is not a vertical heave fault but a horizontal slip fault. Which means Los Angeles will someday be a suburb of San Francisco since the west side of the fault is moving horizontally north. To the dismay and disappointment of some, California will not fall into the Pacific Ocean and make beachfront property in Las Vegas.
The San Andreas is where the Pacific plate joins the North American plate and the EQ system is sometimes referred to as the "Ring of Fire"...just like the IMAX film documents.
While it is inevitable that there will be more major EQs in SoCal, the local government here is way prepared for a major disaster as was exhibited during the 1994 Northridge quake. Granted an EQ, no matter how big would NOT be as widespread as Katrina's devastation, but nonetheless, I think out local and state government has planned for disaster adequately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark, Jim, and Bobby: I somewhat agree with your points, but I think Kyle has some valid points as well...although understandably, he expressed them too emotionally. I certainly do feel sorry for the elderly, infirmed, and those honest and "good" people that, for whatever reason and no matter their economic or "class" status are trapped in a very serious and dangerous situation. I would be scared shitless if it were me.
As far as being "poor" and/or "uneducated", while I DO think in many cases it IS laziness, I also think that a lot of those that are "poor" have never had an oppertunituty to "better themselves". I don't think one can paint "ALL" with the same wide brush.
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-04-2005, 07:18 PM:
No Phil, its because they cant read because they dont live in Salt Lake City.
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 09-04-2005, 07:23 PM:
Did anyone notice the HUNDREDS of flooded school buses that could have moved thousands to high ground? Louis
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-04-2005, 07:27 PM:
(Sorry Phil, didn't know my geological history too well, but thx for the info...)
But, if that does happen, there's gonna be earthquakes felt all along this side of the divide and do some serious damage practically everywhere.
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-04-2005, 08:56 PM:
The Nevada TF-1 group is still stuck in Dallas waiting. Seems FEMA thinks there's enough crews working the disaster area now, so Nevada and SoCal's groups are now waiting to rotate in on the next wave. Which is fine, but very frustrating when those groups were ordered by FEMA to hit the road so quickly in the first place.
Same thing happened today to another rescue group of 50 police officers from all of the commands in southern Nevada. FEMA called Friday for them to move immediately. Just as the team was going to roll this afternoon, FEMA cancelled the mission. Again, very frustrating.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-05-2005, 06:22 AM:
After some Corps of Engineers contractors came under fire in NO today, I can see FEMA's hesitation to send in civilians...
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-05-2005, 06:24 AM:
quote: Richard Fowler
Category one for Miami should of not caused so much damage to power and telephone in our region
My brother said the same thing. He said it was astonishing how much damage the Category 1 did in Miami, compared to what he'd seen from hurricanes around the nothern gulf coast.
quote: Mark J. Marshall
Is it unreasonable to expect our federal government to just call, I don't know, Greyhound, and say "We need EVERY available bus in New Orleans right now." And where are the Army troop transports, the school buses from neighboring towns, etc?
Because they're all being kept out by FEMA, for reasons nobody can get out of them. FEMA is now under the Department of Homeland Security.
The New Orleans Times-Picayune, pretty much a conservative paper, has an open letter to the President about FEMA, detailing a few brief monstrosities by FEMA, & calling for the firing of the current head of FEMA:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001054586
The Times-Picayune, which only yesterday was able to publish a print edition since the hurricane, has been publishing its hurricane/local news here.
quote: Mark J. Marshall
And why bus them all the way to Houston? Is there no train track between the two cities? Bus them to a train station, and load up a few trains full of people and get them moving somewhere.
Amtrak offered to get as close as possible, but[link=http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20050905/NEWS/109050013/-1/rss01]FEMA kept them out.[/url]
There has since been after the mayor of New Orleans told the feds to "get off their asses" ONE 7-car Amtrak train run on 9/2 to Lafayette LA.
quote:
The question that should be asked is not, 'where are the rescuers,' but, 'why didn't they evacuate, when they had DAYS to do so?' A category 5 hurricane is bearing down on you, you live 12 ft. below sea level, and you don't consider LEAVING when a mandatory evacuation is ordered?!
Most of them are people living check-to-check, with no resources to leave. A few elected to stay, but most couldn't get out. The traffic out of NOLA was so slow during the evacuation, even with inboud lanes of the interstate diverted to also be outbound, that it became a 4 hour drive from downtown just to the airport, & after it all bogged down & the hurricane was imminent, the order was given for everyone to just hang on & the Superdome was opened as a shelter of last resort. How fast could you evacuate Chicago?
quote:
Is it unreasonable to expect our federal government to just call, I don't know, Greyhound, and say "We need EVERY available bus in New Orleans right now." And where are the Army troop transports, the school buses from neighboring towns, etc? And why bus them all the way to Houston? Is there no train track between the two cities? Bus them to a train station, and load up a few trains full of people and get them moving somewhere. If not Houston, somewhere else - anywhere else.
Realize Mark, a great deal of the train tracks, trains, busses, Search and Rescue choppers, militart equipment, etc in the area were damaged or destroyed by Katrina.
This is just gassing away at guessing. The interstate, all lanes, between New Orleans & Baton Rouge was completely passable. This was how all the press got in, who are apparently the only people FEMA was afraid to stop. There's lots of video of the long, lonely stretches of interstate between New Orleans & BTR after the hurricane. National Guard & relief could & SHOULD have been streaming into NOLA.
quote: Gordon McLeod
Canada yesterday offered any assistance required including military (peacekeepers) and have relief supplies ready but the offer was turned down for the moment
That has been the case throughout.
Chicago's offer of police & firefighting equipment was deflected by FEMA
The Red Cross was ordered by FEMA to stay out
The Northern Command was put in place days before the hurricane, & several states sent guard units, but none could move until authorized by the president. The mayor on New Orleans officially requested all federal assistance on 8/28, .
On & on. An individual group that brought a trailer full of flat bottom boats to use for rescues was turned back.
Military food drops were offered & ignored: "Bill Wattenburg, a consultant for the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and one of the designers of the earlier food drop programs, said that he has lobbied the administration and the military to immediately begin something similar. He said he was told that the military was prepared to begin, but that it was awaiting a request from FEMA.
"We know very well how to do this, and it's just incomprehensible that we're not," Wattenburg said.' The National Division of Forestry offered air-based forest fire materiel & personnel to fight fires & were refused by FEMA.
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Of course we SHOULD blame our Government and the State of Lousiana for the breaching of the levees
The levees are under the auspices of the Army Corps of Engineers. Almost ALL coastal construction is, but the levees are in particular because they are part of maintaining navigable federal waterways. Not just the river levees, but the Pontchartrain (because when it rains, the river wants to go into the Pontchartrain & then into the residential area), the canal levees, & residential levees, because, along with the pumps, they are all part of the same system. The Corps of Engineers confers with the Levee Board, but nobody touches the levees except the COE. The laws against "interfering with a levee" are so broad as to be a sort of joke when someone's dog poops on the levee.
The Corps of Engineers was part of the disaster planning by emergency agencies (including pre-DHS FEMA), studied what the needs of the levees would be & created a plan, then the OMB slashed their funding for the last 2 years BELOW previous years funding, to 20% of the request -- LESS THAN THE EXPENSE OF MAINTENANCE ALONE.
Levee info
quote:
I was watching a clip of the New Orleans' mayor whining and crying on how the federal and LA state government have not done anything/enough to help that city. What an asshole!
He's blaming EVERYONE ELSE for HIS mismanagement of this whole sad situation and HIS (and his predecessor's) lack of disaster planning and emergency contingencies for a cataclysmic disaster that would ultimately come.
They have known for years that the city is prone to hurricanes AND FLOODS and should have planned ahead instead of yapping and passing the buck. The responsibility for the chaos, deaths, and civil disorder rests SOLELY on HIM and his administration!
No, FEMA is above him when an emergency is declared. Local agencies, like Parish Presidents, have begun defying FEMA orders & even turning back Federal agents & National Guard personnel acting on orders from FEMA to cut power, cease rescues, etc. National Guard has ALWAYS been called out to assist rescues & maintain order in emergencies in hurricanes, etc., because the local law enforcement is neither large enough in number nor having the expertise for civil control. The minuscule number of Guard troops that were in NOLA after the hurricane was about what was put in place for hurricanes in Gulf Shores during their hurricane, nothing near the requirement for a major metropolitan area.
quote:
Yea, I wish someone would go shoot that iddiot Mayor in the ass [thumbsup] so we don't have to listen to him. Perhaps they'll do that in the film version
I don't know how it's playing elsewhere, but across party lines down here, the mayor of New Orleans is showing himself to be the only straightforward person in charge of anything out there. The feds are literally killing people by dragging, pointing, putting off, seizing control & doing nothing, the Guard units can't deploy without authorization from the President, & apparently the President didn't even notice until the mayor of New Orleans publicly cussed them all out. The people in coastal Mississippi are wishing that THEY had someone to get the idiots in charge to get it together, since all the press is in NOLA:
http://www.kron4.com/Global/story.asp?S=3805110
quote: Jim Ziegler
1) Why was the mandaroy evacuation of NO voluntary?
Because they couldn't get everyone out in time.
quote:
2) Why was the city of NO not utilizing buses to evacuate people without cars? After all, they could have used these buses:
Because the citizens with private transportation got on the roads first, & even THEY couldn't all get out[/quote]
quote: Jim Ziegler
3) Why were the interstates leaving NO kept in a 2 way configuration for most of the evacuation? Traffic would have moved much faster having 6 lanes, rather then leave the 3 incomming lanes empty
They did. Contraflow evacuation plans
quote: Jim Ziegler
4) Why did they tells tens of thousands of people to take refuge in the Superdome yet, with the 24 hours advance notice they had, it did not occur to anyone to supply the superdome with food and water?
Because the Superdome was a "shelter of last resort", opened the day of the hurricane. It had stocks of water that I know of, but I hadn't heard that it no stocks of food. The broad question is intended to function primarily accusatory, but is the question "Why wasn't the Superdome stocked 24 hours in advance with enough food & water for 20,000 people to live on for a week?"
quote:
5) Why did the mayor of NO blame FEMA for not securing his city? FEMA is not a law enforcement agency. Why were officers not told to keep control sooner?}
NOLA police were overseeing rescues AND stretching to cover law enforcement. FEMA in ITS PUBLISHED PLAN sends in the National Guard to assist in a declared emergency because the task is huge. NOLA police were doing incredible work with rescues ALONE.
quote: Jim Ziegler
The NOPD (hmmm... NO PD.. it fits) has been one of the most corrupt departments in the nation.
After what? NY, Detroit, LA, Chicago, any large American city? They've been hanging on the job as best they could,
there are now suicides & other
problems with mental strain from dealing with this apocalyptic mess, & quite frankly, they've had a job any
armchair gasbag has never had to DREAM of facing.
[QUOTE=Jim Ziegler]I have heard interviews with both the mayor and the police chief. They think that the way to solve the crisis is to scream and finger point. All they manage to do is make it harder for federal and state agencies to work with them.
The Federal agencies are working AGAINST them, ignoring their requests, getting nothing doen, & apparently the
only way to get anything moving is to publicly list EVERY problem, & publicly identify BY NAME the department
or person responsible. That's finger-pointing & name-calling.
quote:
I did hear on the news last night the Canada was sending police officers to assist in some areas though. Also, other nations do have specialists and supplies as well.[/URL]
I think even a sloppy self-serving memory may recall Gordon McLeod's mention earlier that Canada's offer was turned down. Maybe they'll take them up on it after a few hundred more people die or more infrastructure is destroyed.
quote: Jim Ziegler
The mayor could have done much more to prepare the city for this and minimize loss of life. The city did *NOTHING* to evacuate people who could not leave the city on their own - and then this mayor has the gall to point at Bush and say its all his fault. America is not a nanny state. Local governments and citizens are expected to do what they can to care for their own needs.
No, you're wrong again, but you must be used to that by now. In a state of emergency now, the plan & operation are controlled by FEMA, which is now under the Department of Homeland Security, & much of it cannot be activated without authorization of the President, like deployment of Guard troops & the army. Yes, there was an emergency plan, drawn up by NOLA & FEMA.
[QUOTE=Jim Ziegler]The National Guard is under state control (besides, deploying them before the storm would have rendered those units largely incapable of performing their mission). FEMA and federal troops can do little until the state requests it, but, again, prepositioning units and equipment would have resulted in destroyed equipment and ineffective units
No, even Bush said in trying to CYA that the material & personnel were put in place before the storm, when LA was declared a disaster area BEFORE landfall. The State of Louisisana AND the governor requested their deployment & all emergency services under the state of emergency at landfall .
quote: Jim Ziegler
It takes time to mobilize Guardsman as well - they are not active duty troops on a base - and time to get ships, aricraft, and vehicles together and deployed.
They were on standby when the state of emergency was declared.
quote:
quote: David Buckley When President Bush told "Good Morning America" on Thursday morning that nobody could have "anticipated" the breach of the New Orleans levees, it pointed to not only a remote leader in denial, but a whole political class.
I don't think anyone in power, from the mayor on up, actually expected that levy to break. After all, the storm had lost power and took a swing to the east - everyone thought NO was going to dodge the bullet.
EVERYBODY expected the possibility of a levee breech in a category 3 storm; that's what the levee was ORIGINALLY rated for by the corps of engineers. That possibility was included in the disaster plan created & filed by FEMA. You quite literally are making stuff up.
quote:
quote: David Buckley There are some strange things, like the boss of FEMA has no actual experience of disaster management, which you would have to assume contributed to FEMAs response... Apparently FEMA have been modelling this scenario for over a decade, you would have thought they would be right up in there.
I can't speak to the resume of the head of FEMA, but, agency heads are typically beureucratic posts - which means frequently they are more administrators than anything.
No joke, it's a political appointment & the state, local, & private screaming about FEMA since placed under DHS & the current head are deafening. He has no experience for a post for emergency management; I forgot what his former jobs were.
quote: Phil Hill
.Oft times unsolicited "help" contributes to the confusion and drains resources of those that are "in charge" and trying to get a handle on the situation. Until someone coordinates physical help and donated supplies, help can best be provided by cash contributions to legitimate causes
They weren't doing a thing but consolidating control. Nothing was happening for THREE DAYS of no food, water, or organized rescue, while the feds stopped locals & folks from outside from doing anything, either.
I've been through 3 pages of some misinformation, some disinformation, some questions, & some blatant political spinning. I really don't have any more patience for destructive people who just blast away trying to make things have one political slant or another.
I'm absoloutely sure of Zeigler's party affiliation & who he voted for, he's blowing smoke. Brad can't tell who I voted for, I'm an independent.
I am a screwdriver guy, & don't have the luxury of just saying things are different because it would make me feel better. All I know is you look in the back of the rack & see what burned up. It's obvious here. Two things that absolutely get on my nerves about technical stuff or anything else: people who just make stuff up, & people who don't have to be logical. BS gets on my nerves. Puffing up & presuming to be read as authoritative when gabbing about EMA, the levee system, the situation on the Gulf by someone who knows NOTHING about any of it is really getting me on the boil.
Bush: "Our response was acceptable, the result was not."
Well, if the result was not acceptable, the response sure as hell wasn't. Otherwise, you got the result you wanted.
Posted by Allison Parsons (Member # 2728) on 09-05-2005, 09:19 AM:
Don't know if any has said anything about this or not but...
So, when they drain the city of its standing waters (which is now the 'toxic' mix they were talking about), are they pumping it back into the lake and are they going to filter it?! I know it's of high importance to get all the water out, but I don't think it's so safe to pump human waste/chemicals/oil/dead things into a body of water that still sits right next to the city.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-05-2005, 11:51 AM:
quote: Phil Hill
As far as being "poor" and/or "uneducated", while I DO think in many cases it IS laziness, I also think that a lot of those that are "poor" have never had an oppertunituty to "better themselves". I don't think one can paint "ALL" with the same wide brush.
I just think a lot of the able boded poor folks simply expected a car or bus ride out of there and made a bad gamble. Some folks who weren't poor did the same thing, and some of those people are among the ones who fell victim to carjackings and the like. I don't think it has anything to do with folks bettering themselves or anything like that. They just didn't heed the warnings. Next time I think a lot more people will listen and get out of town while the getting is good -even if they have to walk.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-05-2005, 02:28 PM:
quote: William Hooper
Because they're all being kept out by FEMA, for reasons nobody can get out of them. FEMA is now under the Department of Homeland Security.
Who is being kept out by FEMA (government wise)? Not buses, as tens of thousands have been evacuated by bus already... What took so log was finding the buses and getting them there, as the mayor and the state did not have the forsight to use the ones they had - rather they were destroyed in the storm.
quote: William Hooper
There has since been after the mayor of New Orleans told the feds to "get off their asses" ONE 7-car Amtrak train run on 9/2 to Lafayette LA.
I would say this is largely due to track damage. There are numerous photos on the net of debris and derailed trains blocking the track. Honestly, do you think that the storm which destroyed 3 cities did no damage to infrastructure?
quote:
Most of them are people living check-to-check, with no resources to leave. A few elected to stay, but most couldn't get out. The traffic out of NOLA was so slow during the evacuation, even with inboud lanes of the interstate diverted to also be outbound, that it became a 4 hour drive from downtown just to the airport,
First, if they could not get out on their own, why did local authorites do NOTHING? Rather they waited, until after the event, and threw a fit when the National Guard could not be mobilized and moved at the speed of light. Additionally, the freeways were not converted to one way only until a few hours before the storm hit.. The state just "forgot" to do that.
quote: William Hooper
the order was given for everyone to just hang on & the Superdome was opened as a shelter of last resort.
Opened, but not supplied, by local authorites...
quote: William Hooper
How fast could you evacuate Chicago?
Chicago is MUCH bigger.. Irregardless, if the city cannot evacuate 100,000 with all infrastructure intact, no flood waters, and personnel on scene within the 24-48 hours advance notice they had, how the hell do they expect the feds, who have to mobilize troops, move them and equipment to the scene, bypassing damaged infrastructure and armed gangs, to manage to do what they could not in the same amount of time? On one hand they whine that it was too hard for them to do it, on the other they blame the feds for not performing miracles in their lawless city.
quote: William Hooper
This is just gassing away at guessing. The interstate, all lanes, between New Orleans & Baton Rouge was completely passable.
Completely passable? Wow. All the debris that is covereing all the roads throughout the disaster areas just missed the interstates? What about the destoryed bridges? What about the submerged highways? The only thing any of the infrastructure was completely passable by was a helicopter. Remember William, you have to clear the roads and route around damage before you can stream vehicles in. NO is on the south end of an area of destruction larger than Great Britain.
quote: William Hooper
This was how all the press got in, who are apparently the only people FEMA was afraid to stop.
Actually, a lot of them got in at first by helicopter... Which begs the question, why weren't they being more humanitarian and using those choppers to evacuate the injured and airlift in supplies?
quote: William Hooper
There's lots of video of the long, lonely stretches of interstate between New Orleans & BTR after the hurricane.
And equal amounts of footage of destroyed bridges, debris covered highways and submerged freeways.
quote: William Hooper
National Guard & relief could & SHOULD have been streaming into NOLA.
It takes TIME to mobilize troops and move them and equipment William. Again, NO was not the only city damaged, though it is the only one that is total anarchy. First response in a disaster has always been the responsibiity of local authorities.
quote: William Hooper
The Red Cross was ordered by FEMA to stay out
What do you think, could this have something to do with the fact that they would be fired upon by the locals?
quote: William Hooper
then the OMB slashed their funding for the last 2 years
OMB can't do anything of the sort. Your gripe is with Congress. Also, a lot of the levy money was cut during the Clintion years, because it was Clintion's view that flood control was largely a local matter, and he was able to convince Congress to re-route some of that funding.
quote: William Hooper
No, FEMA is above him when an emergency is declared. Local agencies, like Parish Presidents, have begun defying FEMA orders & even turning back Federal agents & National Guard personnel acting on orders from FEMA to cut power, cease rescues, etc.
So FEMA is in charge, but locals are ignoring them? Myabe that is part of the confusion. William, missions of this size are logistical nightmares without local officials deliberatly obstructing. Remember, this is the largest disaster area in American history.
quote:
National Guard has ALWAYS been called out to assist rescues & maintain order in emergencies in hurricanes, etc.,
Part of the delay in moving other states NG units in was that LA did not have mutual aid pacts with other states that covered law enforcement activities. Absent that, the units could not move until that issue was resolved.
quote: William Hooper
I don't know how it's playing elsewhere, but across party lines down here, the mayor of New Orleans is showing himself to be the only straightforward person in charge of anything out there.
Really, cause in the rest of the country we think he is a loon. I found this interesting - could be because he has, twice now, alleged that the CIA is now trying to kill him - once to the AP, once to CNN -
"Last night he told a reporter for the Associated Press: "If the CIA slips me something and next week you don't see me, you'll all know what happened."
Today he told interviewers for CNN on a live broadcast he feared the "CIA might take me out."
crazy mayor article
quote: William Hooper
the Guard units can't deploy without authorization from the President
Guard units are under the control of the governor in disaster relief missions.
quote: William Hooper
Because they couldn't get everyone out in time.
They didn't try.. They could have gotten some out, which would have meant less people to evacuate after the fact.
quote: William Hooper
Because the citizens with private transportation got on the roads first, & even THEY couldn't all get out
Could have to do with the state not thinking to change over the inbound lanes until the storm was just about to hit.. Poor planning on the part of local authorities.
quote: William Hooper
They did. Contraflow evacuation plans
They were very late in doing so...
quote: William Hooper
"Why wasn't the Superdome stocked 24 hours in advance with enough food & water for 20,000 people to live on for a week?"
That is exactally the question.. You point fingers at the feds for not being able to airlift it in, but you hold the locals blameless for not trucking it in before the flood? The plan to use the Superdoms had been in place for years as a contigency. Had the locals had ANY foresight, MREs and bottled water would have been stored there already.. Again - POOR planning by the local authorities.
quote:
After what? NY, Detroit, LA, Chicago, any large American city? They've been hanging on the job as best they could,
No, they are historically the most corrupt major PD. That is not to say all their officers, or even a majority of their officers are bad, but they have more bad apples than most. That is because of a total lack of effective leadership at the top. The other effect of that lack of leadership is the signifigant collapse of that department.
quote: William Hooper
they've had a job any
armchair gasbag has never had to DREAM of facing.
Armchair gasbag, eh? Because I disagree with you? Are you going to analyze me now?
quote: William Hooper
The Federal agencies are working AGAINST them, ignoring their requests, getting nothing doen
Getting nothing done? Yep.. there are still tens of thousands of people standing at the superdome.. Oh wait, no there isnt...
quote: William Hooper
apparently the
only way to get anything moving is to publicly list EVERY problem, & publicly identify BY NAME the department
or person responsible. That's finger-pointing & name-calling.
So its ok to blame the feds, but don't you dare say anything about the mayor? The same mayor now "hiding" from the CIA?
quote: William Hooper
No, you're wrong again, but you must be used to that by now. In a state of emergency now, the plan & operation are controlled by FEMA, which is now under the Department of Homeland Security, & much of it cannot be activated without authorization of the President, like deployment of Guard troops & the army. Yes, there was an emergency plan, drawn up by NOLA & FEMA.
Guard units are under the control of GOVERNORS unless they are federalized, which is never done in disaster situations. Active duty personnel are used as a last resort due to Possie Comitatus concerns - and cannot be used for law enforcement. The emergency plan called for moving people to the superdome - so why was is not supplied in advance?
quote: William Hooper
They were on standby when the state of emergency was declared.
That does not mean they were on scene. Only in state units in the affected states were on standby, not the entire US...
quote: William Hooper
EVERYBODY expected the possibility of a levee breech in a category 3 storm; that's what the levee was ORIGINALLY rated for by the corps of engineers. That possibility was included in the disaster plan created & filed by FEMA. You quite literally are making stuff up.
if the mayor expected iot to break, then why wansn't he on the radio giving a profanity laden tirade to his people to get them to get out of the area before the storm? What happened is the storm swung east and got weaker... The levy was expected to hold... If I recall correctly, didn't the breaches occur after the storm, due to weakness and the rapidly rising lake? The Mississippi river levys did hold.
quote: William Hooper
They weren't doing a thing but consolidating control. Nothing was happening for THREE DAYS of no food, water, or organized rescue, while the feds stopped locals & folks from outside from doing anything, either.
Um, actually, there were hundreds of helicopter sorties pulling people off roofs, etc.. That is until the locals started shooting at the choppers - which slowed down rescue efforts. FEMA would have been stopping locals from getting in to prevent having more people to rescue. If it was SO EASY to get in any out of NO, then why was everyone stuck at the superdome? Why didn't they just walk out? Those flood waters could have had something to do with it...
quote: William Hooper
I'm absoloutely sure of Zeigler's party affiliation & who he voted for, he's blowing smoke. Brad can't tell who I voted for, I'm an independent.
So now you are trying to get me banned because I disagree with you? How childish... Actually, this has nothing to do with party affiliation...
William - some intersting quotes from another article - Washington Post Article
quote:
The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor.
William, didn't you just insiste that the NG was under the President's authority right now?
quote:
Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. "Quite frankly, if they'd been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals," said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly.
So the locals are slowing down rescue efforts so they can deflect blame? In situations such as this, command and control are VITAL.
quote:
Louisiana did not reach out to a multi-state mutual aid compact for assistance until Wednesday, three state and federal officials said. As of Saturday, Blanco still had not declared a state of emergency, the senior Bush official said.
Oops... I wonder if that could have been part of the problem..
quote:
Blanco made two moves Saturday that protected her independence from the federal government: She created a philanthropic fund for the state's victims and hired James Lee Witt, Federal Emergency Management Agency director in the Clinton administration, to advise her on the relief effort.
Yep.. preventing unified command and control... that sure will help matters...
quote:
In a Washington briefing, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said one reason federal assets were not used more quickly was "because our constitutional system really places the primary authority in each state with the governor."
Its called "states rights" William... In the 1860s LA joined in a rebellion against the federal govt because they felt the govt was interefering with those rights..
quote:
New Orleans City Council President Oliver Thomas acknowledged that the city was surprised by the number of refugees left behind, but he said FEMA should have been prepared to assist.
Translation - "FEMA, fix our screw up- NOW!"
quote:
State officials had planned to turn to neighboring states for help with troops, transportation and equipment in a major hurricane. But in Katrina's case, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida were also overwhelmed, said Denise Bottcher, a Blanco spokesman.
Hmm... I wonder if that could have been part of the delay.. NO wasnt the only one hit you know... However, if you listen to LA and NO officials, NO was the only place damaged at all...
quote:
The boatmen who made it in came back with harrowing memories. Kenny, who did not want to disclose his last name, said friends were shot at by stranded people who wanted to steal their boats. "It's total chaos," he said.
Which is why FEMA has been keeping out non-government people.. Just yesterday, a group of Corps of Engineers contractors came under fire from what has been reported to be a group of 8 people. Police shot and killed several of the attackers.
quote:
9,500 have been rescued by the Coast Guard.
Most of this was during the time you were insisting that no one was doing anything... 9500 people would be a couple thousand sorties...
quote:
Regular military troops are constrained by law from engaging in domestic law enforcement. By contrast, Guard troops, who are under the command of state governors, have no such constraints.
Posse Comitatus, William....
[ 09-05-2005, 03:38 PM: Message edited by: Jim Ziegler ]
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-05-2005, 05:40 PM:
Jim and William, please take the current discussion between the two of you offline directly via private emails. When you have to quote each other in that kind of quantities over such a sensitive issue, that should be a tipoff.
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 09-05-2005, 05:42 PM:
Aw...just when it was getting good AND I wasn't involved!
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-05-2005, 06:45 PM:
I agree, Steve!
Hey! Grand-Poo-BAH, you can be SUCH a killjoy! And just when things were getting interesting, you make threats!
I say let them battle it out...they both have some great points and some ass-hole ones...
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-05-2005, 06:48 PM:
quote:
Aw...just when it was getting good AND I wasn't involved!
Awww.. I'll fight with you later...
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 09-05-2005, 06:57 PM:
I was going to offer to be the referee and hold a film-tech.com boxing match. I had just lined up Walker Texas Ranger to be in one of the corners.
Now I feel used. Sniff, Sniff.
Oh! Well back to the jokes....
Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 09-05-2005, 10:35 PM:
New York City received a request for 50 police squad cars with at least two officers in each. The caravan of 100 eager police volunteers, male and female, some of whom speak creole, were soon dispatched, flashing lights blazing; they arrived quickly in New Orleans, and are presently helping secure the streets.
Mayor Bloomberg echoed the sentiments of the officers by thanking the services of many states who came to NYC after the 9/11 disaster, including many from Louisiana. Seems many New Yorkers were born in N.O. and environs, and the officers jumped at the opportunity to reciprocate assistance.
A request was made also, for 300 NYC firefighters, who were quickly dispatched by air, and are assisting the search and rescue operations in N.O. [In NYC fire personnel are first responders in medical and all other emergencies, and are trained as EMS workers as well as firefighters.]
The NY officers were quickly federalized for service to permit them to serve out of state in their NYC uniforms and vehicles.
Posted by Joseph L. Kleiman (Member # 3097) on 09-06-2005, 01:51 AM:
CTV (which I'm having to watch for my nightly news since CBC, on which I watch The National has decided to do everything like the BBC, including the current walkout
) is reporting that Canada is sending three naval vessels, a Coast Guard vessel and forty naval divers to New Orleans. My conspiracy theorist friends tell me it's just the latest stage of a planned takeover of our country that also includes Cirque du Soleil, IMAX, and those robotic arms that NASA uses.
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-06-2005, 02:05 AM:
Celine Dion too. Along with four Cirque units in town she's been softening up 'Vegas for a couple of years now, occupying the same space where the Caesars Palace Omnimax once stood.
Nevada TF-1 finally got the word to go and they're rolling right now from Dallas into The Big Easy. The second wave of 100 officers from Nevada is still waiting here, having been put on hold yesterday. They expect to get their orders to move out tomorrow.
Posted by Joseph L. Kleiman (Member # 3097) on 09-06-2005, 02:08 AM:
Search for the Great Sharks in Caesar's Omnimax or A New Day with Celine Dion....I fell asleep during both.
That's great news about TF-1. I'm sure the comics convention was driving them nuts.
Posted by Wolff King Morrow (Member # 2226) on 09-06-2005, 05:58 AM:
There was clear ineptitude on the local government including the mayor. Dozens of busses were left unused and the complete lack of planning for such an event is just about everyone's fault. I hold local government even moreso to blame than the federal government for this poor outcome of the evacuation.
What's ironic is the people most directly responsible for this mistake are the very same ones loudly pointing the finger at Bush...
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-06-2005, 06:34 AM:
I have found in just about ever crisis situation, the first person who starts the finger pointing and ranting and raving is usually the most scared about being blamed...
Although I am firmly convinced that the majority of the fault of the chaos of the evacuation was due to mistakes and oversights in local government, I am more concerned that any investigations into the response to the disaster focus on what can be learned from what happened and how to prevent it, and not so much whose head must roll. People panic and make mistakes - especially in a situation like this with no parellel in American history.
Posted by Ron Yost (Member # 1850) on 09-06-2005, 12:59 PM:
Here's a good, well-reasoned article which appears today on the New York Times' site:
September 6, 2005
Magic Marker Strategy
By JOHN TIERNEY
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
It was the climax of George W. Bush's video introduction at the Republican convention: the moment at Yankee Stadium during the 2001 World Series when he threw a pitch all the way to home plate. The video ended, and the conventioneers cheered as Mr. Bush strode onto a stage shaped like a pitcher's mound.
Well, live by the pitch, die by the pitch. When you campaign as the man on the mound, the great leader whose arm rescues Americans in their moment of need, they expect you to deal with a hurricane, too.
Mr. Bush made a lot of mistakes last week, but most of his critics are making an even bigger one now by obsessing about what he said and did. We can learn more by listening to men like Jim Judkins, particularly when he explains the Magic Marker method of disaster preparedness.
Mr. Judkins is one of the officials in charge of evacuating the Hampton Roads region around Newport News, Va. These coastal communities, unlike New Orleans, are not below sea level, but they're much better prepared for a hurricane. Officials have plans to run school buses and borrow other buses to evacuate those without cars, and they keep registries of the people who need special help.
Instead of relying on a "Good Samaritan" policy - the fantasy in New Orleans that everyone would take care of the neighbors - the Virginia rescue workers go door to door. If people resist the plea to leave, Mr. Judkins told The Daily Press in Newport News, rescue workers give them Magic Markers and ask them to write their Social Security numbers on their body parts so they can be identified.
"It's cold, but it's effective," Mr. Judkins explained.
That simple strategy could have persuaded hundreds of people to save their own lives in New Orleans. What the city needed most was coldly effective local leaders, not a president in Washington who could feel their pain. It's the same lesson we should have learned from Sept. 11 and other disasters, yet both liberals and conservatives keep ignoring it.
The liberals bewailing the insensitivity and racism of Republicans in Washington sound like a bad rerun of the 1960's, when urban riots were blamed on everyone but the rioters and the police. Yes, the White House did a terrible job of responding to Katrina, but Democratic leaders in New Orleans and Louisiana didn't even fulfill their basic duties.
In coastal Virginia - which, by the way, has a large black population and plenty of Republican politicians - Mr. Judkins and his colleagues assume that it's their job to evacuate people, maintain order and stockpile supplies to last for 72 hours, until federal help arrives. In New Orleans, the mayor seemed to assume all that was beyond his control, just like the mayors in the 1960's who let the riots occur.
They said their cities couldn't survive without help from Washington, which proceeded to shower inner cities with money and programs that did more damage than the riots. Cities didn't recover until some mayors, especially Republicans like Rudy Giuliani, tried self-reliance.
Mr. Giuliani was called heartless and racist for cutting the welfare rolls and focusing on crime reduction, but black neighborhoods were the greatest beneficiaries of his policies. He was criticized for ignoring social services as he concentrated on reorganizing the Police and Fire Departments, but his cold effectiveness made the city a more livable place and kept it calm after Sept. 11.
Yet Mr. Bush, with approval from conservatives who should have known better, reacted to Sept. 11 by centralizing disaster planning in Washington. He created the byzantine Homeland Security Department, with predictable results last week.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency, often criticized for ineptitude, became even less efficient after it was swallowed by a bureaucracy consumed with terrorism. The department has spent billions on new federal airport screeners - with no discernible public benefit - while giving short shrift to natural disasters.
The federal officials who had been laboring on a one-size-fits-all strategy were unprepared for the peculiarities of New Orleans, like the high percentage of people without cars. The local officials who knew about that problem didn't do anything about it - and then were furious when Mr. Bush didn't solve it for them. Why didn't the man on the mound come through for them?
It's a fair question as they go door to door looking for bodies. But so is this: Why didn't they go door to door last week with Magic Markers?
Email: tierney@nytimes.com
-- end of article
Ron Yost, moderate in all things.
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-06-2005, 01:09 PM:
Well, at least Sean Penn is down there doing what he can...

Link (found this on Drudge)
Text:
Sean Penn's rescue bid sinks
From correspondents in New Orleans
05sep05
EFFORTS by Hollywood actor Sean Penn to aid New Orleans victims stranded by Hurricane Katrina foundered badly overnight, when the boat he was piloting to launch a rescue attempt sprang a leak.
Penn had planned to rescue children waylaid by Katrina's flood waters, but apparently forgot to plug a hole in the bottom of the vessel, which began taking water within seconds of its launch.
The actor, known for his political activism, was seen wearing what appeared to be a white flak jacket and frantically bailing water out of the sinking vessel with a red plastic cup.
When the boat's motor failed to start, those aboard were forced to use paddles to propel themselves down the flooded New Orleans street.
Asked what he had hoped to achieve in the waterlogged city, the actor replied: "Whatever I can do to help."
With the boat loaded with members of Penn's entourage, including a personal photographer, one bystander taunted the actor: "How are you going to get any people in that thing?"
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 09-06-2005, 03:12 PM:
Thank God for Sean Penn. He is so important. The world could not survive without his activism. Sean Penn. Yeah. He is great. Look at that giant cup of water he is getting out of New Orleans. Louisiana will be a dryer state much quicker thanks to the likes of Sean Penn the important actor.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-06-2005, 03:23 PM:
Wouldn't everyone be better off if Sean Penn didn't futz with the publicity stunt and instead just donated 10 million dollars or something to the Red Cross?
Oh no wait...publicity stunt! Geez, what was I thinking.
Posted by Joseph L. Kleiman (Member # 3097) on 09-06-2005, 04:25 PM:
Next thing to happen will be Oprah giving a brand new car to everyone from the Ninth Ward.
Speaking of which, the three major US car companies are giving a 90-day leeway on car payments for anyone in the Hurricane damage area. GM is cool - they're just doing it. Ford is requiring car owners to call. And Chrysler is sending a letter with instructions. How the hell these people are going to call and get mail when both are out of service is beyond me.
Another note: I've been trying to keep track of the Entergy IMAX theater to see if it sustained any damage and to locate the staff (unsuccessful so far). The best I've been able to monitor is the adjacent aquarium. They made it through the hurricane with only one fish dying. It was sick anyway, so it was expected to die. After two days, the skeleton staff of two keepers was told to leave by the NO police because of looting and violence in the area. The generator supplying oxygen to the tanks has ceased operation and Audubon Institute is now reporting that almost all the fish have died.
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-06-2005, 04:50 PM:
quote:
Here's a good, well-reasoned article which appears today on the New York Times' site:
Excellent article!
I hope - but I know it is in vain - that the after action review that Congress wants will focus on what the problems are and how to fix them - and not who to point the finger at. Government officials do make themselves look bad when everyone is pointing the finger at each other.
The U.S. has really gotten away from civil defense and disaster prep. It sounds like the disaster guy in VA has found a very good way to get the message across. There is a lot of pressure right now to make FEMA a seperate agency. I don't know if that is needed persay, but DHS needs to focus FEMA on natural disasters - which are a much larger threat than terrorism.
A lot of people forget that government is made up of the same fallabel people that make up the rest of society. People make mistakes, things get overlooked. In this case, a lot of things got overlooked. Hopefully this will be a wake up call to all local and state governments to get serious about emergency planning. While no one expects a mayor or a governor to be an expert in disaster relief, the citizens can, and should, expect that they have disaster relief experts advising them on what needs to be done.
Basically, we, as a nation, got caught sleeping. People died that should not have. Its tragic. Not learning the lessions, or not applying the lessions from this, will be much more tragic.
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-06-2005, 07:21 PM:
quote: Joe Redifer
Look at that giant cup of water he is getting out of New Orleans.
Actually, it looks like he's using the cup to put the water BACK in the street.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-06-2005, 07:28 PM:
quote:
Here's a good, well-reasoned article which appears today on the New York Times' site:
WOW! Thats the first article from the "Old York Times that has made ANY sense in the last 20 years. I'm definately amazed.......
As for Sean Penn and Oprah... they BOTH shoulda been in that water logged boat together.
Mark
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-07-2005, 03:53 AM:
Brad, i shouldn't be a problem because I read just the first two replies from Zeigler's subsequent post & decided to read no more of his posts because they're just sh*tstorms of fabrication & misdirection.
The last references I'll make to them, in case someone's curious about the last 2 items of his I'll read are:
quote:
Because they're all being kept out by FEMA, for reasons nobody can get out of them. FEMA is now under the Department of Homeland Security.
Who is being kept out by FEMA (government wise)? Not buses, as tens of thousands have been evacuated by bus already... What took so log was finding the buses and getting them there, as the mayor and the state did not have the forsight to use the ones they had - rather they were destroyed in the storm.
This is a blatant shifting of time in your reference. The tens of thousands were evacuated AFTER the period of buses being kept out by FEMA in the 3 days prior to the mayor of NOLA telling the gov't to "get off their asses". Those three days of keeping rescue assistance out resulted in 3 days of people dying from dehydration, lack of medication, injuries, etc. With this misdirection, it's plain that facts aren't as important as spin. Why, I don't know.
There is considerable misunderstanding about the deployment of guard units & other military during a time of emergency. Before the hurricane's landfall , the governor declared a state of emergency for LA on 8/26 & asked the president to declare a national state of emergency so that the guard could be called out. Bush declared a state of emergency on 8/27.
In a state of emergency, FEMA (under DHS) *pre-empts* & coordinates state & local efforts. It is the *co-ordinator*, & in this case the bottleneck or destructive agent.
The president's emergency declaration authorizes the FEMA to coordinate all disaster relief efforts and to provide appropriate assistance in a number of Louisiana parishes, or counties.
The Louisiana Guard is under the direction of the governor of LA, but deployment of other states' units to another state must be authorized through the Pentagon:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Several states ready and willing to send National Guard troops to the rescue in hurricane-ravaged New Orleans didn't get the go-ahead until days after the storm struck — a delay nearly certain to be investigated by Congress. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson offered Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco help from his state's National Guard on Sunday, the day before Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana. Blanco accepted, but paperwork needed to get the troops en route didn't come from Washington until late Thursday.
Additionally, it is the RESPONSIBILITY OF FEMA to "act pro-actively" putting in place & deploy national resources of material & personnel in emergencies: "The NRP establishes policies, procedures, and mechanisms for proactive Federal response to catastrophic events. A catastrophic event is any natural or manmade incident, including terrorism, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the population, infrastructure, environment, economy, national morale, and/or government functions."
FEMA pre-positions resources for preparation during non-emergency periods, & for predictied events such as this one pre-positioned additional neccessary resources. However, they weren't deployed:
"There is a tremendous amount of frustration here, that we have assets stacked up ready to go and we don't have the requests for them," said an officer who asked not to be identified. "All we can do is nudge the folks at FEMA and say, `How about if we do this or that?"
Pre-positioning these federal resources such as troops, etc. were done before landfall in reccommendations during conferences which included DHS, FEMA, & state & local authorities. These are standard briefings with federal, state, local EMA's before hurricanes
The Bataan was put in place for emergency ops, but unused, as well as other federal troops & resources.
Just for additional examples of FEMA keeping resources out after the hurricane, Wal-Mart sent bottled water into Jefferson Parish & was turned back by FEMA agents.
Add airboats to the list of transport including buses ,trains, & flatbottom boats for evacuation turned back by FEMA.
In the meantime, FEMA is recruiting firefighters from other states...to hand out fliers for FEMA..
I think reading yesterday that I was getting too livid being baited by BS to point out the ridiculousness of an argument against the inefficiency of the response being swung to "these things take time" when the point was that that time (during which people were dying & property being destroyed) was being burned up by FEMA's interference; and the deflection of "these posts are mostly bureaucratic" to defend putting in place someone with no experience in emergency management.
Also I think there was some reference to "that's why things went more smoothly in Mississippi", which is not the case. It's been & is still a sh*tball over there, too.
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 09-07-2005, 03:08 PM:
Way to follow directions, William! That sure looks like a private email to me!
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-08-2005, 02:21 AM:
I will wait for Brad's ok before I respond to that - though I don't think it would do much good, as William seems to want to sling mud against posts that, by his own admission, he hasn't read...
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-08-2005, 07:17 PM:
Jim, I personally hope Brad does not give you "permission" to respond to William's diatribe...we all get it.
I agree with Mike. Hopefully William will wise up and post on some other site to vent...this is NOT the place! I for one find his posts WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too long ....oh and B O R I N G!
Like my penis... keep it short!
I sincerely hope that the BS does not cause Brad to lock this thread... there is a lot of good info, thought, AND opinions here!
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-09-2005, 02:00 PM:
From the new orleans newspaper
quote:
Doomed nursing home had offer of bus transport
Coroner says owner snubbed help until it was too late
By Paul Rioux
Staff Writer
Less than 24 hours before Hurricane Katrina began ravaging St. Bernard Parish with 140 mph winds and a 20-foot storm surge, Coroner Bryan Bertucci made an urgent call to the owner of St. Rita's Nursing Home near Poydras.
"I told her I had two buses and two drivers who could evacuate all 70 of her residents and take them anywhere she wanted to go," he said.
But Mabel Mangano refused the offer. "She told me, 'I have five nurses and a generator, and we're going to stay here,'" Bertucci said.
It turned out to be a tragic decision.
On Wednesday, nine days after the storm had passed, Bertucci watched as a dozen workers from a federal agency that specializes in handling mass casualties began the gruesome task of removing about 30 decomposing bodies from the still-flooded nursing home.
...
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-09-2005, 03:58 PM:
I'd like to see Brad edit the long winded posts to just say "blah blah blah" and leave it at that.
Back to the topic at hand, how many folks will be watching the telethon that will be running on ALL of the networks tonight? I wonder how many of the acts will be able to simply perform without making some stupid political comment to ruin the atmosphere.
Posted by Joseph L. Kleiman (Member # 3097) on 09-09-2005, 04:31 PM:
I just wanted to share this tidbit of information about New Orleans' other residents from the American Zoological Association:
quote:
While the aquarium survived Hurricane Katrina relatively unscathed, its life support system did not; most of the animals in its aquatic exhibits were lost. However, the sea otters, penguins, macaws and raptors, leafy and weedy sea dragons, some fishes, and Midas, a 250 lb. green sea turtle all survived thanks to the care of staff who remained at the aquarium through the hurricane, flooding and civil unrest.
The Aquarium has power again as of yesterday. In addition, a new staff team staff arrived yesterday as replacements for those who have been at the Aquarium.
The Aquarium has relocated the surviving animals from its marine life collection to four colleague institutions in Monterey, California; and Dallas, Galveston, and Houston, Texas.
On the film side, the Entergy IMAX theater, adjacent to the aquarium is also run by the Audubon Institute. The interior of the theater suffered no damage and we've been able to locate a couple of projectionists, including the CP, in Florida. No word yet on the rest of the staff.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Editing in to add this interesting tidbit from NPR:
quote:
Officials have put together a makeshift jail in New Orleans' bus and train terminal. "Without a jail, [there would be] no reconstruction," says the warden of the city's newest holding facility for criminals. An Amtrak locomotive is providing power to the facility. Chain-link pens hold the prisoners. And the Orleans Parish district attorney has set up a temporary office in the gift shop.
[ 09-09-2005, 06:18 PM: Message edited by: Joseph L. Kleiman ]
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-17-2005, 07:24 PM:
With all government $$$ promised and pouring in to New Orleans, I'm seriously thinking of buying some high-ground land there.
I would bull-doze whatever structure is left there and build a new hurricane-proof "brick" residence at the US taxpayer's expense. So, no matter how much the big bad wolf huffs and puffs, I want to be better off than I was before Katrina.
I mean "they" owe it to me. Oh, BTW, I know it would be at my and my kid's expense as well as of all the US taxpayers for umpteen years to come.
Anyone wanna join me in my quest? I want to once again do the Macarena in the French Quarter...
Posted by Andy Summers (Member # 3207) on 09-17-2005, 07:40 PM:
My prayers go to all that where affected by this, and all you can do in the event of another bad a natural storm, is take cover and wait it out it is not possible to fight nature of such violent intensity….
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-18-2005, 08:18 AM:
quote: Phil Hill
With all government $$$ promised and pouring in to New Orleans, I'm seriously thinking of buying some high-ground land there.
Phil,
To find ANY high ground you're going to have to go north to about Memphis TN. area. There is NO high ground any where near N.O.!
Personally rebuilding it is a total waste, all it would take is one more hurricane through there this year to finish the place off for ever. I don't think the levees could take another pounding again....
When the refugees from N.O. arrived here in Utah most said they would never go back to N.O. again... they had never seen anything outside of the dump of a town they had been living in.... most of them had never seen mountains before and were literally blown away!!
Mark
Posted by Matt Fields (Member # 3211) on 09-18-2005, 12:53 PM:
The refugees may have liked Utah, but people in the Astrodome were offered free rent for an apartment in Columbus, Ohio for a year and help finding jobs and only seven people or so volunteered to come.
There was enough apartments for 200 people.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-18-2005, 01:38 PM:
I can't remember exactly how many refugees came to Utah but it was in the hundreds....
Now we are brginning to evacuate the lower keys.... Hopefully the EXACT same scenerio won't play again...
Mark
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-18-2005, 08:03 PM:
quote: Matt Fields
The refugees may have liked Utah, but people in the Astrodome were offered free rent for an apartment in Columbus, Ohio for a year and help finding jobs and only seven people or so volunteered to come.
I am sure I am going to get flamed all to hell for this, but oh well. You have a variety of types of people in the Astrodome right now.. You have the elderly - who probably don't want to go to Ohio. You have the people who want to go back to NO. And you have the third type - the people scared off by the very mention of the word "job". The people left in NO after the evacuation - who then ended up at the Superdome and the the Astrodome were largely dependant on government - some, like single parents, the elderly and the disabled, were dependant because they had to be. However, a SIGNIFIGANT number of able-bodied adults are dependant because they WANT to be. I would wager that of the people left in the Astrodome fit into one of the above categories - those who are not dependant and don't want to be dependant, have already made other arragements to get their life back on track.
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-18-2005, 09:05 PM:
quote: Joseph L. Kleiman
Next thing to happen will be Oprah giving a brand new car to everyone from the Ninth Ward.
If such a thing were to happen, I wouldn't be surprised if the cars were given without any of the taxes being paid for the recipients: "Hey, here's a brand new car and a tax bill of $5000!"
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-18-2005, 09:17 PM:
quote: Jim Ziegler
I am sure I am going to get flamed all to hell for this, but oh well. You have a variety of types of people in the Astrodome right now.. You have the elderly - who probably don't want to go to Ohio. You have the people who want to go back to NO. And you have the third type - the people scared off by the very mention of the word "job". The people left in NO after the evacuation - who then ended up at the Superdome and the the Astrodome were largely dependant on government - some, like single parents, the elderly and the disabled, were dependant because they had to be. However, a SIGNIFIGANT number of able-bodied adults are dependant because they WANT to be. I would wager that of the people left in the Astrodome fit into one of the above categories - those who are not dependant and don't want to be dependant, have already made other arragements to get their life back on track.
Well they say that today the Astrodome is really beginning to empty out and there are not that many left there. As for those brought to Utah U can't answere that exactly but what I gathered on the news they are more the get out and work type. But I certainly agree with your atatement otherwise.
Mark
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-18-2005, 09:54 PM:
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
but what I gathered on the news they are more the get out and work type.
I wish I could say the same for the refugees that were brought here to Corpus. APAC Customer Services had 200 job openings to refugees to try and make a new start, and supposedly only a few showed up.
Its not like they were offering them minumum wage either. Most jobs there start at $7.50 an hour with full benefits. Not the best hourly pay, but full benefits sounds pretty good to me.
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2