This is topic I don't care for celebrities and I don't care if they die in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=004800

Posted by Greg Anderson (Member # 235) on 09-06-2006, 05:17 PM:
 
Well... that title isn't really true. But I thought there should be a dumping ground for those kinds of comments.

I'll start. Personally, I wouldn't care if I never hear another word about Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, K-Fed, "Diddy," Colin Farrel, and anyone who was ever on Survivor, just to name a few.
 
Posted by Brian Michael Weidemann (Member # 2243) on 09-06-2006, 05:52 PM:
 
What? Celebrities can die? When did that start happening?
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-06-2006, 05:54 PM:
 
I personally think the good vibes as well as the slams should be posted in the individual thread of the announcement...not some general thread as this.
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 09-06-2006, 06:09 PM:
 
Yeah Phil, I agree.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-06-2006, 06:10 PM:
 
Thanks Rach, I'll PayPal you the $20! [Razz]
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 09-06-2006, 09:41 PM:
 
I agree with Greg. Let's take a vote. [Eek!]
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-06-2006, 10:17 PM:
 
Yeah, this thread wont get nearly as many responses as actual acts of asshole-ness. Though they do have something in common. A public cry for attention.
 
Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 09-06-2006, 11:20 PM:
 
Paris Hilton....EGAD! [puke] [thumbsdown]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-07-2006, 02:58 AM:
 
quote:
Personally, I wouldn't care if I never hear another word about Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, K-Fed, "Diddy," Colin Farrel, and anyone who was ever on Survivor, just to name a few.
Agreed - they manage to be both celebrities and boring at the same time, which is really the kiss of death (though, incidentally, when the inevitable happens to Britney Spears' marriage, her husband will presumably become K-FedEx, which should make for some interesting trademark litigation).

Celebrities who are also class A wack jobs I can cope with - Mel Gibson, Tom Cruise and President Ahmedinejad for example - because it's amusing to see the reaction when they start spouting their extremist or off-the-wall views. But this apparent cult of being famous for nothing in particular - certainly not for being unusually talented in any meaningful way - is seriously annoying.
 
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 09-07-2006, 04:08 AM:
 
Actually you are wrong Leo! This cult of people you refer to do have one amazing talent in common... They can rape the shit out of teenagers wallets from hundreds and thousands of miles away.

Ciao
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-07-2006, 07:54 AM:
 
You are all boreing and you should all die and go away! The miracle of a useless thread......
 
Posted by Mark Ogden (Member # 43) on 09-07-2006, 09:53 AM:
 
Paris Hilton boring!?!? C'mon, she's a Captain Beefheart fan, fer crissakes!

 -
 
Posted by Allison Parsons (Member # 2728) on 09-07-2006, 10:00 AM:
 
I'm not even a Beefheart fan, and I work at a indie record store [Big Grin] So I highly doubt she is. OHHH, and lookie! She got arrested for a DUI last night! Can't wait for the mugshot!
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 09-07-2006, 11:12 AM:
 
Who the hell is Paris Hilton? Seriously, I've heard the name, but I haven't got the slightest idea who she is.

The one that gets me are the celebrities who publish their memoirs when they are in their 20s, or thereabouts. Wasn't it normal to do this later in life, when you had lived long enough to have actually done something interesting.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-07-2006, 11:21 AM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
Who the hell is Paris Hilton?
The daughter of Richard Hilton, the hotel magnate, who appears to have made a celebrity career out of spending her father's money. Nice work if you can get it!
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 09-07-2006, 11:27 AM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
but I haven't got the slightest idea who she is.
She doesn't either.
 
Posted by Michael Gonzalez (Member # 593) on 09-07-2006, 11:45 AM:
 
The title of this thread kind of looks bad directly above the Steve Irwin one. Just saying...
 
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-07-2006, 11:55 AM:
 
Wasn't she on some video or something? Richard probably knows.
 
Posted by Steve Scott (Member # 630) on 09-07-2006, 12:47 PM:
 
Celebrities perpetuate trivial personal drama that's not worth $4 on a checkout magazine rack. Give me weekly world news & those little how to talk to your cat books, any day! [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 09-07-2006, 12:53 PM:
 
She's a girl that was born into (a lot) of money so she makes herself seem succesful without actually doing anything.

Leo's comment basically says it all. When she wanted to put out a CD she created her own record label for herself.
 
Posted by Wayne Keyser (Member # 2420) on 09-07-2006, 03:26 PM:
 
But ... but ... but ... how can you say she's not important? She's famous, isn't she? And the things famous people do is vital news, worthy of my full attention! Much more so than those boring stories about people in foreign places - heck, some of THOSE people don't even speak English! (Imagine that!)

No, to be an informed citizen, I have to know every latest detail about the lives of Oprah, and Katie, and Paris, and Tom Cruise (you know, he seemed very sincere when he said psychology is bunk - I'm gonna throw my kid's meds away, 'cause they're just brainwashing him!)

You people should be ashamed of yourselves.
 
Posted by Cory Isemann (Member # 2517) on 09-07-2006, 03:37 PM:
 
[sleep]
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 09-07-2006, 03:38 PM:
 
There are many fine, caring, down-to-earth celebrities out there, who live away from the Hollywood lifestyle, contribute to their communities and raise their families in relative peace. When it is time to work on or promote a film, they do it, but, otherwise, they fade into the background.

What I object to is these people famous for being famous. Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, the Olson twins, the Simpson sisters. There may be some talent spread among this group, but not all that much. They seem to spend their life partying, etc. Lindsay has been ripped by her producer and Bill Macy for wasting the time of the entire set by partying and being late.

But, as long as there are supermarket tabloids and gossip web sites, I'm afraid we'll just have to put up with them and ignore them as much as possible (and quietly laugh at most of what they do!)
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 09-07-2006, 06:58 PM:
 
quote: Chris Hipp
When she wanted to put out a CD she created her own record label for herself.
What's wrong with that? That's actually a very smart thing to do if you can afford the upfront costs (which she can). Why give the record company all the profits when you can keep them yourself and give the company a distribution fee instead?

People (myself included) are quick to insult Paris Hilton, but she's very savvy in many ways.
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 09-07-2006, 07:41 PM:
 
Not that there is anything wrong with it. I was simply suggesting that A) she creates her own label which indicates that she does not need talent to get signed and B) that she has enough of her parents money to do so without having to work at it like other pop stars like Britney and Jessica Simpson have.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 09-07-2006, 07:51 PM:
 
Actually I think by now she's got quite a good chunk of change of her own money from business ventures. Granted much of that is due to her parents money no doubt, but in any case it's not like she's solely sponging off them.
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 09-07-2006, 08:08 PM:
 
Agreed, I think I read somewhere that she makes roughly 2 million a year from TV stuff and modeling. I'm sure she is digging into daddy's pocket for a lot of the stuff she does, though.

But hey, some people are born fortunate like that. I would do the same if I would have been born under those circumstances.

My main point is that she can't really be lumped in with most other pop stars. You may not like their music, I dont like most of it myself, but they did have to have talent to gain their success. Obviously once they make it as a singer they will get parts in movies/tv because of their fame, but they still had to earn that fame.
 
Posted by Chad Souder (Member # 343) on 09-07-2006, 09:01 PM:
 
quote: Mark J. Marshall
Wasn't she on some video or something?
Oh come on, man, everybody watched that video. You had to. I watched it a couple times and it certainly wasn't because of the quality. I was helplessly drawn to it. Here is an attractive girl worth way more money than most of us will ever see in our lives. She could buy her way in and out of anything, yet she's eager to perform the same sex acts that many men have to beg their ladies for. And that guy was a nobody. It is what I will always remember her for.
It was way better than that "One Night in China" video. [puke]
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-07-2006, 09:26 PM:
 
quote: Chad Souder
Here is an attractive girl
Who are we talking about again? Youre just losing all kinds of points here.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 09-07-2006, 10:08 PM:
 
quote: Chris Hipp
You may not like their music, I dont like most of it myself, but they did have to have talent to gain their success.
I have not heard the whole Paris Hilton CD but it's actually getting pretty good reviews from real music critics, and the tracks I have heard are not as bad as I figured they would be. She's definitely a producers' product, but she has a better voice than Britney Spears (which isn't saying much, I guess).
 
Posted by Greg Anderson (Member # 235) on 09-08-2006, 01:13 AM:
 
quote: Greg Anderson
Personally, I wouldn't care if I never hear another word about Paris Hilton...
Oh, dear. I've created my own nightmare.
 
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 09-08-2006, 03:20 AM:
 
quote: Wayne Keyser
You people should be ashamed of yourselves.
And yet here you are right along with us. Shame, shame, shame!

quote: Chad Souder
Oh come on, man, everybody watched that video. You had to.
Just because you like drudging through the muck of the universe for personal pleasure doesn't mean the rest of us are abliged to join you! Believe it or not, most people didn't see "that" video, and most people didn't care that it was out there.

Unlike Peter Frampton's album that everyone on the planet had a copy of upon birth between 1972 and 1977, this video only became a required part of the culture of the depraved and hermits alike.

Ciao
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 09-08-2006, 06:02 AM:
 
quote: Mark J. Marshall
Wasn't she on some video or something?
Ah yes, I remember now where I heard the name. A couple of years or so ago I suddenly got loads of e-mails saying 'Watch the Paris Hilton video', and a URL to go to. Since the e-mails were obviously junk I binned them, so I never saw the video, and never found out who Paris Hilton was. I can't say that I feel my life is incomplete because of this.
 
Posted by Chad Souder (Member # 343) on 09-08-2006, 04:23 PM:
 
After re-reading your post, Phil, I agree that the good and the bad should be kept in the individual threads, but before I leave this one alone, I will boldly admit that I watched the Paris Hilton video so much it gave me carpal tunnel syndrome. I guess if that makes me a muck drudging, depraved hermit, then you are not welcome in my cave.
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-08-2006, 06:10 PM:
 
Paris Hilton, much like Phil, is an ugly, dirty whore. Okay, I take that back, Phil's not that ugly.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 09-08-2006, 06:39 PM:
 
So Stephen, do you not watch TV or read the newspapers or any magazines?
 
Posted by Aaron Burgess (Member # 3875) on 09-09-2006, 03:03 AM:
 
yeesh
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-09-2006, 05:58 PM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
A couple of years or so ago I suddenly got loads of e-mails saying 'Watch the Paris Hilton video', and a URL to go to. Since the e-mails were obviously junk I binned them, so I never saw the video, and never found out who Paris Hilton was.
I doubt if you would have done, even if you'd succumbed to temptation and clicked. I suspect that you'd have been directed to a site which invited you to enter your credit card details in order to see the delightful Ms. Hilton, after which you'd have been greeted with a 404 error screen. That would have been followed, when your next card statement dropped through the letterbox, with news that several hundred quid had been debited from your account to that of a customer of the National Bank of Sodomistan, or some such place.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-09-2006, 07:10 PM:
 
quote: Jeremy Fuentes
Paris Hilton, much like Phil, is an ugly, dirty whore. Okay, I take that back, Phil's not that ugly.

I'd be ***REAL*** careful bub! In addition to your "wooden horsie" pic with you wearing your cowboy hat, I have many pics of you to post including this one from the last FT party at Brads... [beer] [Razz]

 -
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-09-2006, 11:48 PM:
 
I thought those were destroyed! Okay, I can explain...okay, I'm lying. I have no words to explain what everyone just saw. I knew I shouldnt have gone! Or at least I should have never tried Brads "special" mix drink. Oh well.. [beer]
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 09-10-2006, 01:16 AM:
 
Wow Jeremy, you make one hell of a sexy female... Mmmmm, I want you. [Wink]
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 09-10-2006, 03:21 AM:
 
That can't be Jeremy... though the picture seems familiar.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 09-10-2006, 09:08 AM:
 
quote: Mike Heenan
So Stephen, do you not watch TV or read the newspapers or any magazines?

I haven't had a TV, at least not a working one, for something like 18 months now. I tend to work long hours, so by the time I get home I'm often too tired to watch it anyway. I may get a new one some day, but I might just get one of those USB tuners that plugs into a computer; cheaper, and saves space. I can play DVDs on the computer, and if there's something that I really want to watch I'll either get somebody to record it on DVD for me, or buy it on DVD, if it's available. I haven't recorded anything on VHS for several years, and I'm gradually transferring those recordings that I want to keep long term.

I don't read newspapers that often, maybe once or twice each week, I don't have the time to read them every day. Most British newspapers are pretty poor, if I do buy one it's usually either the Daily Telegraph or the Guardian, one is moderate right of centre, and the other moderate left; they tend to have better journalists than most of the others, most of which are terrible, but I did buy the Daily Mail for two weeks recently as they were giving away 12 classic british films:

Kind Hearts and Coronets
The Man in the White Suit
The Ladykillers
The Titfield Thunderbolt
Billy Liar
The Cruel Sea
The Colditz Story
The Great St. Trinian's Train Robbery
Passport to Pimlico
Far From the Madding Croud
The Lavender Hill Mob
School for Scoundrels

and very good transfers they are too; [Smile] I'm not normally tempted by free offers, but these did seem worth getting. I hardly read anything in the papers, it was all the usual Daily Mail scare stories telling me that I would probably be shot, stabbed, bombed, or in other ways harmed, probably by nasty foreigners; all about as likely as being struck by lightening, and not something I feel inclined to worry about. The papers that I doo read seldom mention her, and if they do my inclination is to turn to the next page.

I do read magazines, but they're technical ones on various subjects, and unlikely to feature Ms. Hilton, unless she actually does something interesting.

These days I get most of my news from the Internet, from many different sources. To be honest, I would be unlikely to follow links about some woman, or man, that I've never met, buying something, getting engaged/married/divorced/drunk/arrested, saying something outrageous, being involved in a fight <insert other subjects that the newspapers seem to be interested in> or whatever. I'm just not interested in it.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-10-2006, 03:24 PM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
...it was all the usual Daily Mail scare stories telling me that I would probably be shot, stabbed, bombed, or in other ways harmed, probably by nasty foreigners...
Don't forget that the EU will be forcing us all to drive on the right and making garlic compulsory in school dinners next year! [Big Grin]

I would have bought the Daily Mail for the free DVDs, had I not just bought the Ealing box set containing four of them a fortnight or so before they did that promotion - grrr!
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 09-10-2006, 03:32 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Don't forget that the EU will be forcing us all to drive on the right
Really?

 -

OK, Jeremy, now I understand you and your points in the other thread much better. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 09-10-2006, 07:11 PM:
 
[Big Grin]
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2