This is topic Gas Prices in your area in forum Film-Yak at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=005491

Posted by Mike Williams (Member # 1140) on 08-29-2003, 06:31 AM:
 
Gas is getting extremely expensive!

Yesterday, I paid $1.60 a gallon for the cheap stuff.

I know in other parts of the country it is much worse. Has anybody seen it cheaper than this?
 
Posted by Jeff Stricker (Member # 224) on 08-29-2003, 06:58 AM:
 
It's $1.69 in central Indiana today, down from $1.76 last weekend. You can buy a gallon of milk for the same price. [Mad]
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 08-29-2003, 09:15 AM:
 
Fuel is costing an "arm and a leg":

http://www.edge-inc.net/humor/index.cfm/page/one/id/1040/t/Image.htm

http://www.hypercenter.com/jokes/gas/gas01.shtml

http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/HighGasPrices2003/main.asp
 
Posted by Scott Jentsch (Member # 1681) on 08-29-2003, 09:57 AM:
 
I paid $1.85 for regular unleaded here in the Milwaukee, WI area two days ago. I think it might be up to $1.89 now.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 08-29-2003, 12:34 PM:
 
Ours was $1.64 last week; $1.76 this week.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-29-2003, 12:39 PM:
 
The cheap stuff up here is anywhere from 1.96 a gallon up to 2.15 a gallon. For the most part, it is 2.03
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 08-29-2003, 12:43 PM:
 
Chevron premium is $2.119 in my part of town, higher along the freeways and where ever tourists be.
 
Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 08-29-2003, 02:14 PM:
 
Up here, 91 cents a litre.
 
Posted by Peter Kerchinsky (Member # 1098) on 08-29-2003, 02:35 PM:
 
Here in the Seattle area the "lowest" I've seen is $1.86 at Arco and up to $2.03 at most others. Stations near the freeway are about $1.99 to $2.10!
Has anyone out there heard a reasonable explaination for the recent hikes, or do we know already!
Have a great and safe holiday weekend all.
Pete
 
Posted by Matt Hale (Member # 1518) on 08-29-2003, 02:50 PM:
 
quote:
Up here, 91 cents a litre.
Thats US$2.47/gal at todays exchange rate. I'm ashamed to admit I actually paid that much yesterday. $10 bought me one day's worth of gas. [Mad]
I want an electric car and I want it now!
 
Posted by Chris Markiewicz (Member # 1415) on 08-29-2003, 03:17 PM:
 
$2.33 for regular here in Kamuela. I understand it's pushing $2.40 on Maui.
 
Posted by German Marin (Member # 918) on 08-29-2003, 03:21 PM:
 
Nobody will believe this. In Venezuela:
$1 = Bs.1598
1 liter of gasoline 91 oct: Bs.70 = $0.04
1 gallon = 3.78541 ltr
1 gallon = $0.16

1 liter of "green" gasoline 95 oct: Bs.97 = $0.06
1 gallon = $0.23

The people say the Gas is too expensive...
I think it's a waste of money.
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 08-29-2003, 05:12 PM:
 
You have cars in Venezuela?
 
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 08-29-2003, 05:48 PM:
 
$1.499 yesterday
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 08-29-2003, 05:53 PM:
 
Although I started a thread on this topic a few months ago that received over fifty hits, I am very glad another one has taken it's place for discussion.

My regular station now charges $2.24.9 for the premium grade I prefer to use for my car but I have found others that charge about 6 cents cheaper for the same Union 76 gas I buy. I now shop around for the best prices. There were times when most of my commuting could be done by taking the bus and a full tank of gas costing about $27.00 would last almost two weeks. With the bus strike now in Honolulu and the entire island of Oahu here in Hawaii, a tank would only last about five days. [Frown]

-Claude
 
Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 08-29-2003, 05:58 PM:
 
They say it's coming down in September.

They are blaming the eastern blackout for the high gas prices.
 
Posted by Craig Hanham (Member # 1010) on 08-29-2003, 06:32 PM:
 
try buying gas in New Zealand.
Just gone up to $1.10 a litre (4L to the gallon).
At current exchange rates $1NZ = 56c US that makes $2.46US a gallon roughly.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 08-29-2003, 08:49 PM:
 
I paid 2.099/gallon for regular at an ARCO yesterday -- next to Costco, some of the lowest-priced gasoline in virtually the highest-price market in the mainland USA.

That same ARCO had diesel fuel for $1.789/gallon. Wish I had owned an oil-burner! [Frown]
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 08-30-2003, 05:54 PM:
 
That`s just as expensive as gas prices around here!!!
 
Posted by Mike Fitzgerald (Member # 1304) on 08-30-2003, 10:09 PM:
 
Gas is at it highest price here that I remember and I paid $1.55 a gallon usally I get it at Wal-Mart for 3 cents ledd than that and they say South Carolina is less than this
 
Posted by Jesse August (Member # 1798) on 08-30-2003, 11:16 PM:
 
In the middle of Canada (Winnipeg) I filled up with regular today and it was 70 cents a litre.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 08-31-2003, 02:15 AM:
 
Hmmm, if I only lived a little bit closer to Manitoba. I just payed 91.6 for Ultra 94... $70 to fill the car to go 350 km... not bad I guess. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 08-31-2003, 06:25 AM:
 
Here in Vancouver at 4am, the cheap stuff was 85.9
 
Posted by Steve Anderson (Member # 364) on 08-31-2003, 09:03 AM:
 
Here in Nashville:

$1.62-$1.68 for 87 octane
 
Posted by Jeffry L. Johnson (Member # 453) on 08-31-2003, 09:55 AM:
 
This Web site was funcitonal in the past.

Gas Price Watch

This site is under re-design. Please check back in a few days.

Thank You.
 
Posted by Travis Hubrig (Member # 1745) on 08-31-2003, 03:29 PM:
 
Our gas prices were around 1.879 now they are a little better...
the higher octane (premium or gold) is a little cheaper in places. Is this just in North and South Dakota? I am pretty sure it is because they use an ethanol mix (corn gas)in the premium and are trying to make it more widely used.
 
Posted by Greg Mueller (Member # 17) on 08-31-2003, 09:19 PM:
 
Cheapest diesel around here was in Madras Oregon. $1.699 per gal. Here at home $1.799. My Secret gas store in Chimacum is $1.759
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-01-2003, 05:32 AM:
 
Craig: it's around $1.15-20 per litre in the UK (UK£0.72-78 depending on the petrol station).
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-01-2003, 06:25 AM:
 
$1.65 for mid-grade last night in Slidell, Louisiana.
It is fun doing all the metric/US & currency conversions.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-01-2003, 08:06 AM:
 
What is the difference between regular, mid-grade and premium in the US? Here we have normal unleaded (95 RON) and super unleaded (98 RON). There is also 'Lead Replacement Petrol' (LRP), which is 98 RON but with a synthetic compound added for use in older cars which still have soft valve seats (lead in petrol is now illegal under European Union law). Normal unleaded is the equivalent of $1.15-20 per litre and Diesel around $1.20-25, while super and LRP are $1.30 plus.

I don't know what proportion of petrol engined cars used super. I would guess it's quite small, because I certainly don't know anyone whose car needs it.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 09-01-2003, 09:05 AM:
 
HAven't bought gas in the last four days.. but it was $1.51 for 87 octane 4 days ago. This was at the local Sam's Club gas pumps.
 
Posted by Chris Markiewicz (Member # 1415) on 09-01-2003, 04:17 PM:
 
Here in Hawaii the pump octane is: regular 87, plus 89, "premium" 92. It's figured as the average of motor octane and research octane. Right now in Kamuela, regular $2.33, plus $2.43, premium $2.53.
 
Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 09-01-2003, 05:26 PM:
 
In NYC inspectors find on occasion that stations are selling regular gas in higher octane pumps and pocketing the extra profit. Of course severe penalties are invoked. But I've always driven cars that are manufactured to run on regular, and I use that to avoid such scams as well as for economy.
................................................................

[EDIT: Just the facts, M'am:]
Elmhurst, NYC 11373, Sept 2nd,'03
197.9; 109.9; 215.9

[ 09-02-2003, 10:16 AM: Message edited by: Gerard S. Cohen ]
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 09-01-2003, 06:55 PM:
 
Please don't start a political forum discussion in the General Film-Yak section...even though everything seems to swing that way! [Smile] I'm seeing into the future (Yes I can! Ok, maybe not...)and although Gerald's post is quite harmless I'm waiting for someone else to comment on it. Just a warning! Say what your gas prices are or I'm sure Brad, Joe, Daryl, or Adam will close this topic. We already had a gas price thread in the political forum that got out of hand and closed.
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 09-01-2003, 08:09 PM:
 
Since F-T people know everything: is there any reason to ever buy gas with higher than 87 octane? I used to have a car with a turbocharged engine; the manual said to buy premium (93) gas; since I was (am) cheap, I usually just bought 87 and never had any problems with the car that had anything to do with the type of gas that I used. Was I just lucky?

My current car (which doesn't have a turbocharged engine) runs fine on 87 as well, which is what the manual says to use.
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-02-2003, 01:51 AM:
 
quote:
What is the difference between regular, mid-grade and premium in the US? Here we have normal unleaded (95 RON) and super unleaded (98 RON). There is also 'Lead Replacement Petrol' (LRP), which is 98 RON but with a synthetic compound added for use in older cars which still have soft valve seats (lead in petrol is now illegal under European Union law). Normal unleaded is the equivalent of $1.15-20 per litre and Diesel around $1.20-25, while super and LRP are $1.30 plus.

I don't know what proportion of petrol engined cars used super. I would guess it's quite small, because I certainly don't know anyone whose car needs it.

Gasoline at US stations is available usually in grades of 87 octane, 89 octane, & 91 octane. Some stations' premium is 93 octane.

Leaded gasoline has not been available in the US since the early 80s or late 70s, when its distribution was phased out for environmental reasons. When leaded gasoline was phased out, there was a large uproar among the antique/special interest autombile groups who worried about the damage to their valves & valve seats due to the loss of the tetraethyl lead. Many, many entrepeneurs came out with additives to put in gasoline to protect the car, increase octane, etc. - none of the additives could contain actual tetraethyl lead of course, that would be illegal. You will likely be pelted with many, many images of dirty-looking automobile parts contrasted with nicer ones captioned "SEE THE EFFECTS OF UNLEADED GAS!" In the long run, in normal use, unleaded gas made no difference. In modern cars, I'm sure that the ones mfd for sale in the UK are likely to have heads that will be long-lived when sold in the US.

Modern cars in the US are all fuel-injected, have electronic ignition, & are microprocessor controlled with a bazillion sensors all over. If pre-ignition is detected, fuel mixture and ignition advance can be adjusted. Have you noticed that you almost never hear a backfire anymore? There is less power, but the driver usually does not notice & the car is not damaged. No modern car really "needs" it, but it does have an affect performance.

The last caburetted car sold in the US was the unjustly maligned Yugo. It's drawback was that it was so inexpensive that folks just flogged them until they needed repair, & then found the repair was for more costly than the car! It made the car seem disposable, & thus it also became unfashionable & undesirable. It was quite a nice little urban car, except that the manual transmission felt like stirring [bs] with a stick. Early ones were infamous for a problem which plaqued many cars of the early catalytic converter era - they'd clog up & just stop. Again, the repair would cost almost as much as for what you could buy another!
 
Posted by Charles Everett (Member # 889) on 09-03-2003, 03:19 PM:
 
I filled up on Labor Day at a Mobil station in Hatboro PA (Philly suburb) and paid 191.9/gallon for mid-grade self-serve. Mobil stations in New Jersey are at least 8-12 cents less a gallon across the board -- and that's for full serve. (Self-serve is illegal in New Jersey).

quote:
Gasoline at US stations is available usually in grades of 87 octane, 89 octane, & 91 octane. Some stations' premium is 93 octane.
Where I live the major brands have their octane at 87 regular, 89 mid-grade and 93 premium. Sunoco Ultra has 94 octane -- the highest you can legally buy.
 
Posted by Trevor Bailey (Member # 75) on 09-04-2003, 08:38 PM:
 
30AUG at Hess in Woonsocket, RI 1.779 regular
03SEP at Exxon in Falmouth, MA 1.930 regular
04SEP at BJ's Club in Portsmouth, NH 1.649 regular

Fuel on Cape Cod is always high, so 1.93 is not surprising (but still annoying). BJ's Club in Portsmouth usually seems to have the lowest price along 95 between CT and ME.
 
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 09-05-2003, 11:03 PM:
 
Filled up today here at $1.58/gallon
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 09-06-2003, 11:57 AM:
 
I just got back from a 2,000 mile drive. The lowest gas price was $1.73 in Ridgeway Colorado.

The Highest was $2.49 in a small town in Nevada, 50 miles past another small town where the price was $2.25, but 100 miles till the next gas station. I got 5 gallons.

The second highest gas price was $2.19 in my home town of Cloverdale California! [Eek!]

California and Nevada seem to be sticking it to people. Colorado and Utah seem quite reasonable.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-06-2003, 01:46 PM:
 
Most places in my area is anywhere from 1.99.9 to 2.15.9 now, and it sure does not look like it is going to drop much at all. ARCO dropped theirs to 1.91.9 at the Inconvenience Stores.
 
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 09-06-2003, 06:00 PM:
 
I passed a Citgo station today that had $1.49 for 87 regular.
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 09-06-2003, 06:23 PM:
 
Today was $1.79 in Manitowoc... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 09-06-2003, 06:37 PM:
 
I really hope those cars that burn premium gas will do fine with regular. Most of the new vehicles I'm looking into buying spec premium fuels.

The opinion seems to be 50/50. Most of people on the import sites are saying that running anything less than 94 octane in say a TSX will damage the motor. Others say that there are sensors that will adjust the cam timings to make up for the cheaper gas. I really hope the latter is true, then I can get the car I want.
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 09-09-2003, 11:42 AM:
 
California's Attorney General: Profits soar with gasoline price spike in a report from NBC News.

http://www.nbc4.tv/news/2464774/detail.html
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 09-09-2003, 01:21 PM:
 
Since the transit strike started exactly three weeks ago today here in Honolulu, I had to top my tank almost three times at around $2.19 a gallon for premium at the least expensive station I can find. If the busses were running, I would have only used half of that amount. There are rumors that many gas dealers deliberately raised the prices by seven cents overnight to take advantage of people like us who were forced to use our cars when the busses stopped running. This is a shame when greed will make people to do things like this. [Frown]

-Claude
 
Posted by William H. Ward (Member # 1797) on 09-09-2003, 06:41 PM:
 
I filled up today at l.41/gal. This is down from 1.55/gal the last month or so.
 
Posted by Pete Wolla (Member # 1581) on 09-09-2003, 09:29 PM:
 
$1.749 reg or 10% ethanol at cenex
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-10-2003, 12:50 AM:
 
$1.59 Sunday night at the same station in Slidell, LA.
Down $.06 cents per gallon in one week.
That's the week AFTER the big Labor Day weekend of huge gas sales.
 
Posted by Gracia L. Babbidge (Member # 582) on 09-10-2003, 10:44 AM:
 
Prices here have been $1.699 to $1.799 for 'regular unleaded', and have been that way for a couple of weeks. My hope is that they'll drop a bit as tourist season dwindles down.
 
Posted by Matt Hale (Member # 1518) on 09-10-2003, 01:54 PM:
 
Station owner says he is tired of gouging customers, drops price by 40¢
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2003/09/09/top_story/news01.txt#3

still about $2.26 (82.9) around here.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-10-2003, 02:04 PM:
 
Matt, I am glad someone had the balls to do that. Kudos for him and his wife. [Smile] Of course, you know the oil companies are going to "get even" with him. [Frown]

Reminds me of the gas war in the late 1960's in a city of Montana.

Station #1:
Independent station owner was an "unknown millionaire" to everyone in the town.

Station #2:
Big oil. Didn't like owner of Station #1. He undercutted his gas prices to steal customers from Station #1.

Station #1 dropped his prices, and #2 followed. This kept on for a while and it finally pissed off the owner of Station #1.

So.....Owner of Station #1 posted a big sign that said:

"IF YOU PAY THE TAX, YOU CAN HAVE THE GAS"

Needless to say, that ended the gas war between the two stations. [Smile]

The Local Inconvenience Store dropped their price from $2.00.9 to $1.96.9 this morning. Another dropped theirs from $199.9 to 191.9.
 
Posted by Chris Markiewicz (Member # 1415) on 09-16-2003, 03:54 PM:
 
9/15/03 regular gas
Hilo, Hawaii $2.08
Kamuela, Hawaii $2.32
Kawaihae, Hawaii $2.29 (where WATERWORLD was filmed)
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 03-01-2004, 10:37 PM:
 
Might as well bring this back up. We're getting clobbered again. This week Chevron premium is at USD $2.349 per gallon here, mid-test approx $2.249, regular at $2.149. Supposedly Nevada is the third highest in the US, after California and Hawaii. Prices continue to rise about $0.05 a week. Some analysts think we'll hit $3.00 per gallon this year. The usual explanations apply.

Not that any of this matters to me--I walk to work and school these days. [Smile]
 
Posted by Dan Lyons (Member # 1454) on 03-02-2004, 12:24 AM:
 
Weren't prices supposed to go down since we took over Iraq? something fishy going on... [fu]
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 03-02-2004, 01:31 AM:
 
I've said it before, I'll say it again...Motorcycle
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-02-2004, 01:42 AM:
 
Same story here... over the last month or so petrol prices have risen from around £3.42 ($6.38) per gallon to UK£3.56 ($6.63). This story appeared on BBC News Online yesterday:

quote:
Oil prices rise to one-year highs

World oil prices have risen to one-year highs due to continuing concerns about the lack of stocks in the US, and instablity in major producer Venezuela. During trading in New York on Monday, the price of Brent crude gained $1.11 a barrel to $33.34.

The rise has been fuelled by a report last week that the US was not storing enough oil ahead of the peak summer period when many drivers hit the roads. It also comes after Venezuela said it might stop supplies to America.

Continuing pressures

That threat was made by embattled Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, who has accused the US of supporting his protesting political opposition. The combination of factors are forcing prices up; despite reassurances from Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter, that it would ensure adequate oil supplies.

Saudi Arabia did not comment on whether it wanted the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) to call off plans to cut output next month if prices remain high, itself another upward pressure. Concerns the US is not stockpiling up enough oil comes from official figures from the US government's Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Last week it warned that American oil stocks are at an almost historic low, and stores of gasoline and other oil-based products have also declined.

Stability plea

The findings of the EIA shocked the markets because at this time of year the US normally builds up its stocks ahead of the high-use period in the summer, when Americans take to the road for their holidays. "The ongoing low level of US fuel supplies and strong demand combined with fears of Venezuelan supplies... sent prices higher," said Barclays Capital analyst Kevin Norrish.

Saudi Arabia oil minister Ali al-Nuaimi said: "It is extremely important the international oil market, certainly the consuming countries, will always feel that the major producers are constantly in dialogue to make sure that supply is sufficient, that there are no shortages." He added: "And it is extremely important that the market remains stable."

Link to article.
 
Posted by Robert E. Allen (Member # 1351) on 03-02-2004, 01:54 AM:
 
$1.79 a gallon on the southern Oregon coast where they pump the gas for you. $2.19 a gallon, self-serve, just across the border on the northern California coast.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 03-02-2004, 02:11 AM:
 
Price has been hovering between $1.59 and $1.69 here for the past six months. Usually Montana is kind of high, I'm not sure why we've been so steady but I'm not complaining!
 
Posted by Jeff Stricker (Member # 224) on 03-02-2004, 06:06 AM:
 
$1.69 in central Indiana this morning....
 
Posted by Oscar Neundorfer (Member # 458) on 03-02-2004, 06:20 AM:
 
$1.569 per gallon for mid grade this morning in Snellville, GA which is east of Atlanta, GA about 15 miles. Typically, Georgia gas prices seem to be lower than elsewhere. Not sure why, but I'm not complaining!

On any given day in my area, I have seen it vary as much as 10 to 15 cents per gallon between stations, even within the same brand.

One of my pet peeves is the use of the $.009 on gas prices. Why not just say $1.57 instead of $1.569. Must be a marketing ploy to make unthinking people believe they are getting a great deal or something.

I am 53 years old, and I remember when gas was 15 to 18 cents per gallon. My Grandfather owned a gas station, and he was always complaining when the oil companies wanted him to up the price a bit.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-02-2004, 11:53 AM:
 
Regular is at 1.69 per gallon at ARCO, up to 2.02 per gallon for premium at other stores.

It is said that we can expect regular gasoline go up to 2.50 per gallon by summertime. Some think it might even go as high as 3 bucks a gallon in some areas.

I guess I am going to re-join the ranks of a "biker" again. Driving a cage is just getting too darn expensive.
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 03-02-2004, 01:46 PM:
 
Gas costs about $3.20 per gallon here in The Bahamas.

B$1.00 = US$1.00
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 03-02-2004, 02:34 PM:
 
About $1.69 in central Ohio right now, but it depends on the day.

For some reason, the magic day here is Thursday. Almost all gas price increases come on Thursday. They usually stay the same Friday, Saturday and Sunday, then drop a dime or two on Monday. Thursday, it starts all over again. No one has ever been able to determine why Thursday, but Thursday AM you can see the people in front of the stations with their poles changing the prices!
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 03-02-2004, 03:01 PM:
 
Hawaii's gas prices here on the island of Oahu is about $2.18 per gallon for premium and about a dime less for each of the two lower grades. What makes Hawaii's gas prices the highest in the country is the state and county tax.
Honolulu county tax (Oahu) is 16.5 per gallon. Maui's tax is 18 cents a gallon. Kauai is 13 cents a gallon and the tax in Hawaii county (Big Island) right now is 8.8 cents per gallon but it's mayor, Harry Kim wants to increase it by six cents to improve roads and bus service. On top of the county tax is the state's share and it is 16 cents a gallon.

Because of the high price of gas, I have been using Honolulu's excellent public transportation system during the past two years if I only have to go to my color lab to drop off work or to one of our malls in Honolulu to see a movie. The only time I use my car is when it is work related. My average gas bill a month is about $115.00.

-Claude
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-02-2004, 03:48 PM:
 
quote:
What makes Hawaii's gas prices the highest in the country is the state and county tax.
You have my sympathy. We have the highest petrol/gas prices in the developed world by a significant margin (though some other European Union countries run us pretty close). They're heading towards $7 a gallon, some 82% of which is tax. It's taking all the self-control I can muster not to start making political remarks about that... [Mad]

The following currency conversions are all courtesy of www.xe.com . In a typical week I spend around $50 on petrol covering 300 miles commuting by car (three days a week), and a further $27 by train (the other two). The only reason I don't commute by train all week is that if you leave before 9.30am, $13.50ish for a return journey becomes $42 (compared to $17 in petrol costs for each return journey by car), and I can only juggle things in order to do a couple of hours at home before heading in on two days. So much for these taxes being in aid of the environment... oops, sorry, getting political.

If the only tax on petrol was the same sales tax (we call it Value Added Tax, or VAT) as is charged on all other goods and services, my weekly petrol bill would be around $10. The other $40 is fuel duty, which goes straight to the government. OK, by British standards I am very unusual in living 48 miles from my place of work, but thanks to fuel duty I reckon that about half my income goes to the tax man, all told.
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 03-02-2004, 04:04 PM:
 
Last Year I spent $2,225 on gas. This works out to about $185 per month. So I use about 100 gallons of gas per month. I get about 20-miles per gallon for fuel economy. Which means I drive about 2,000 miles per month. Or about 24,000 miles per year. I live 35-miles from work and drive it about 6-days per week.

I'm thinking about buying a new car. I'd like one that got at least 35-miles per gallon. I could save $1,000 per year on gas, but at the expense of $3,600 in new car payments. So a new car would still be $2,600 per year more expensive than what I am driving today.

I moved 35-miles farther from work for a couple of reasons. One is that the air is clean and it is near a lake in which I like to swim. The other reason is that the houses were about $50,000 less expensive than in the town where I work. So I am spending about $3,500 per year on my car without making car payments. How long can I do this before negating the $50,000 price advantage on my house?
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 03-02-2004, 04:24 PM:
 
quote:
I am spending about $3,500 per year on my car without making car payments. How long can I do this before negating the $50,000 price advantage on my house?

First of all, do you attribute 100% of your car expenses to your home/work commute?

How much of that could you eliminate by moving closer to work?

How long do you expect your current car will last?
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 03-02-2004, 04:49 PM:
 
I think its $1.79 in Manitowoc WI right now...well, it was yesterday. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Kyle McEachern (Member # 2250) on 03-02-2004, 05:01 PM:
 
I filled up about 3 days ago in Sacramento, CA for $2.099/gal, I believe - for regular...was the cheapest one I could find.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 03-02-2004, 05:54 PM:
 
On Monday, most service stations here were selling gas at $1.52. Now, one day later, the price for regular is $1.69. Forecasts say prices could spike significantly higher by summertime.

My commute to work is only around 6 miles. With the prospect of $2 per gallon prices, the investment in a decent bicycle is looking more and more attractive.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 03-02-2004, 07:29 PM:
 
$2.30 USD / gallon here. Boo hoo. Even at about $3000+ a year, fuel costs fall behind nearly all of my major expenses, including food.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 03-02-2004, 07:40 PM:
 
Yeah, those damn Nachos have really gone up in price, huh Daryl?

>>> Phil
 
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 03-02-2004, 08:44 PM:
 
I commute primarily by rail unless I need to go somewhere directly after work and it's in the same direction. Train station is about a 4 minute drive from home and then about a 6 minute walk when I get downtown. Parking at the suburban station costs $1/day and the monthly commuter train ticket for my zone costs $110.70. If I drive it's about 33-35 miles one way and parking costs $13.00 though this rises to $16 after 10:00AM and I've paid as much as $19 if I stay to work an evening show. That's a park district (government) owned parking garage. The private one next door starts at something like $23 for an ordinary workday.

Oh yeah...my train is electric, 1500 VDC.
 
Posted by Gary Crawford (Member # 2038) on 03-03-2004, 02:33 PM:
 
Got gas this morning at $1.54.9 a gallon for regular. The prices in Central NJ went up about a nickel last week.

NJ is usually pretty cheap, comparatively speaking of course. We DON'T have self-service and we're still cheaper. And we do have the big refineries here in the northeast and southwest parts of the state.

Depending upon the company, gas today was from $1.54.9 where I got it today (Citgo) and $1.79.9 at an Exxon.

Don't know about today, but I traveled to Alabama for a funeral last September and I noticed Tennessee seemed to be about 10c or more cheaper than NJ at most all of the stations.
 
Posted by Floyd Justin Newton (Member # 1316) on 03-03-2004, 09:04 PM:
 
Gas at Arco at 5:00 PM today was $2.279 (regular).
fjn
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 03-03-2004, 09:10 PM:
 
Someone needs to invent a Mr. Fusion like the one on the Time Machine in BTTF 2. Then we could use garbage for fuel and there would be less trash in landfills.

BTW, The prices here are 1.63-1.67 for regular.
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 03-03-2004, 09:43 PM:
 
I'll get right on it Richard.

Technically you could is anything flammable for fuel, just not with an internal combustion engine.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-03-2004, 10:02 PM:
 
We are probably going to see 3 bucks a gallon, so get used to it. It is going to happen. Be prepared to pay more for everything you buy, including food. If you think the railroads, airline industry and the trucking industry is not going to pass the costs of fuel to the wholesalers and retailers, you're nuts! It is already happening.

Heating oil for next winter will also be sky high, probably almost at par with Diesel fuel which will prevent the truckers from burning that stuff in their rigs. They already have. Why do you think Diesel fuel is dyed? (Green for on-road and red for off-road use). If you think about it, heating oil is not dyed (as far as I know in some areas.) So, that leaves it "wide open" for dishonesty in the trucking industry. They can dye it any color they want to escape fuel taxes.

Ever notice how high the price of kerosene is? That stuff burns great in Diesel engines. So does jet fuel. Military issue aviation ground support Diesel powered equipment burn just that - jet engine fuel - no need to carry a separate inventory.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 03-03-2004, 10:13 PM:
 
You didn't just predict inflation, did you. [Wink]
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-03-2004, 10:16 PM:
 
Daryl, I sure did. It is going to be a real mule-hauler from our wallets. So much for economy recovery. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-04-2004, 01:38 AM:
 
quote:
We are probably going to see 3 bucks a gallon, so get used to it.
What makes you think that the price of oil is likely to go up that much in the short term? Agreed entirely that the price of oil affects the price of everything (all goods and people are moved by burning it, and virtually all services are provided by burning it). But you're suggesting that a virtual doubling of the oil price is imminent. Sure, it's crept up a bit recently; but (in Britain at least) there are no signs that it's about to go up that much.

From our perspective, if rises of that order are imminent, we're screwed. The huge personal debt mountain, runaway property price inflation, rising taxes and the strong pound have put the economy on a knife-edge. It's only the relatively low interest rate that is stopping it from going over that edge. I'm sure that a short-term oil price rise of that order would create the inflationary pressure needed to push interest rates up and thereby pull the house of cards down. [Eek!]
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-04-2004, 06:53 PM:
 
Leo, it will. It is all over the news. This has been predicted by <ahem> economists. I hope they are wrong, but by the looks of things, it is going to happen.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-05-2004, 06:33 AM:
 
I hope they're wrong, too! No interest rate rise yesterday (the Bank of England makes its decision on the first Thursday of the month), thank goodness. A manufacturing sector which has failed to grow in line with the rest of the economy is thought to be the main reason for keeping rates at 4%. But property prices, personal debt, public sector spending and tax continue to soar, plus the price of oil is creeping up. I can't see any way how we'll avoid a crash before long.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-06-2004, 01:58 AM:
 
Gasoline shot up 7 cents a gallon overnight at the local inconvenience store. I suspect the others will follow suit when they get a new load of gasoline.
 
Posted by Gunnar Johansson (Member # 1661) on 03-06-2004, 08:34 AM:
 
Swedish prices today are listed below, although I don´t drive a car (not only do I not own one, I don´t have a license), but gas prices is one of the costs that´s a good comparison to other costs, as are the cost of milk and other everyday items.
Ranging from 1,22 USD per liter
being the most expensive to 0.97 USD per liter which converts to (in US gallons as opposed to British gallon): $4.62 per gallon and $3.67 per gallon.
 
Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 03-06-2004, 10:05 AM:
 
Phoenix, AZ area:

87 octane about $2.00/gal;
89 octane about $2.10/gal;
91 octane about$2.20/gal
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-06-2004, 12:20 PM:
 
Petrol prices here are around UK£0.77 per litre, which translates as US$1.41. So even Sweden - which has a reputation as being the tax-and-spend welfare state capital of Europe, has cheaper petrol. This government, grrr! [Mad]
 
Posted by Pete Wolla (Member # 1581) on 03-06-2004, 02:58 PM:
 
$1.749 per gallon regular unleaded and gasahol
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 03-06-2004, 08:49 PM:
 
Got gas for $1.68 in Burlington, WI (near Racine). In Racine it was about $1.73 average. In Manitowoc its $1.72 right now. In Milwaukee it was $1.76 on the interstate. Sorry, went on a little road trip this week for work... [Smile]
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 03-06-2004, 10:44 PM:
 
The highest I've seen gas recently... was 87 octane for $2.29 -- thankfully I don't often use my car for personal reasons, so the company covers most of it.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-07-2004, 12:51 AM:
 
According to NY Times on AOL News, it is now $2.75 a gallon for regular and $2.95 for premium at some stations in San Francisco.

In Los Angeles, a news clip reads:

quote:
LOS ANGELES, March 5 — "This is killing me," Bob Sherwood, an electrician who spends a lot of time on the road, said on Friday at a Santa Monica gas station after paying $30 to pump 13 gallons of gasoline into his '71 GMC truck.
Well, lets see....$30.00 divided by 13 gallons = $2.30 a gallon. As I said before, it is going to happen, so deal with it.

Scott, I wonder how long the company will take care of some of the expense. I wish you the best of luck.

For semi-retired people like me, it is getting cheaper to stay home than to goof around with part-time jobs just to have something to do. [Frown]

I guess I can forget about a vacation this summer. [puke]
 
Posted by Mike Fitzgerald (Member # 1304) on 03-07-2004, 07:15 AM:
 
We always tended to be among the lower cost for gas here in east North Carolina.However in the last week it went from 1.57 to 1.69 in a matter of days and that was a few days ago I have not been to see what it has gone up to this weekend.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-10-2004, 12:12 AM:
 
Kinda sorta related, it seems odd that a certain breed of engine has been around for 110 years. It was an engine designed to run on gunpowder then developed to use vegetable oil injected under pressure directly into the combustion chamber. An engine that needeed no spark or electricity to run and that is still the only choice for heavy transport today. This engine is of course the Diesel engine which was invented by French-Born Rudolph Diesel (18 March 1858 - September 29, 1913.)

Mr. Diesel was also a consultant for Busch-Sulzer Brothers Engine Company from St. Louis, Missouri. (Yes, related as an independent company to Anheuser-Busch Company, the makers of Budweiser, Busch, and other beers.) That company designed and built the largest Diesel engines ever made in its time. A 3,000 horsepower 10-cyl 2-cycle engine where the pistons weighed 4,000 pounds each.

Incidently, Busch-Sulzer built engines for maritime use in ferry boats, submarines, and I have heard locomotives.

So, if they could burn vegetable oil 110 years ago, why do we have to spend 2 bucks a gallon for fuel oil?

Some time ago, a bunch of college kids modified a Diesel engine to burn McDonald's french fry oil. Sure, it smelled like a french fry when it was tooling down the road, but who cares? The fuel was free.

What's the point? To me, it is simple. There are other alternatives for cheap fuel. Always was, and always will be. Stuff that in your pipe and smoke it. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-10-2004, 01:49 AM:
 
quote:
Some time ago, a bunch of college kids modified a Diesel engine to burn McDonald's french fry oil. Sure, it smelled like a french fry when it was tooling down the road, but who cares? The fuel was free.
Someone thought of that here, too. A couple of years ago the bogies arrested five motorists for doing exactly that in an attempt to evade paying fuel duty. The smell was what caught them.

quote:

Police impound cars run on cooking oil

Police in west Wales have taken action against five drivers in one day for using vehicles run on cooking oil as part of a clampdown on the illegal practice. The motorists were stopped under new legislation which makes it an offence to use the oil as an alternative fuel without paying a fuel tax levy.

It has been reported that a growing number of motorists are using the ordinary frying pan oil in their diesel engines to cut costs. But such drivers face having their vehicles impounded if they do not pay a fine of £500 and persistent offenders face up to seven years in jail.

The legal problem is, that by using 32p-a-litre cooking oil instead of petrol costing around 73p a litre, they are not paying fuel tax. But they are committing an offence because all cars on public roads must pay fuel tax - and cooking oil is not taxed.

Officers have launched a crackdown in areas and it is reported that six drivers were arrested and questioned at Burry Port. The Automobile Association (AA) has warned that cost-conscious motorists could be storing up trouble for themselves.

Oil fumes

"It could severely damage your vehicle if you do not follow the manufacturers instructions about which fuel to use," a spokesman said. Traffic police - dubbed "frying squad" officers - are sniffing out the tax dodgers because the fumes smell like chips cooking.

One driver, who did not want to be named, said: "I've halved my motoring costs since I started running my diesel Subaru on cooking oil. The car runs just as well and even smells a lot better than diesel." The motorist was one of dozens who have had their cars impounded in the crackdown.

He said: "I was stopped by an unmarked car which had blue lights flashing. The officer went to the fuel tank, dipped it, and found cooking oil. "I put my hands up to the offence and the car was towed away. They said Customs would be notified."

Legal powers given to the Customs and Excise mean that drivers are being forced to hand over £650 to get their vehicles back. They can be fined £500 for using illegal fuel and charged a £150 towing fee.

More sold

A Dyfed-Powys Police spokesman denied earlier reports that six drivers had been arrested in the crackdown. "It is part of our spot stop-and-check fuel strategy to catch offenders dodging fuel taxes."

One supermarket in Llanelli confirmed it sold more cooking oil than any other branch in the country. Asda spokeswoman Rachel Fellows said: "We have to admit we do sell a lot of cooking oil at our Llanelli store, but anyone seen attempting to wipe out our stock with bulk purchases would be stopped."

Customs and Excise spokesman Bill O'Leary said: "All cars on public roads must pay a tax on the fuel they use. "Evasion is a criminal offence and carries a maximum seven-year jail term."

Link to story.

The main problem, I guess, would be getting hold of enough of the stuff without arousing suspicion. I burn about 40 litres of fuel per week: if I were to attempt to buy that much in one fell swoop from my local supermarket it would surely attract instant attention. Ditto if a private individual tried to buy 200-litre drums from a catering supplier. I suppose I could go round all the shops in town buying a litre or two at a time, but doing that every week would bore anyone out of their mind. You would need to have links to the catering industry to stand any chance of getting away with it, I suppose.
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 03-10-2004, 03:35 AM:
 
Or do it legitimately. Collect waste oil from the fish and chip shops ( as often as not they will give you it for free ), process to turn into biodiesel and pay the fuel duty on it, such as it is. Still saving a small kings ransom!
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 03-10-2004, 05:53 AM:
 
They really should give us tax breaks for doing that: burning biomass doesn't produce anything like the Co2 emissions as fossil fuels, and what's more it's renewable. But that logic assumes that the rationale for sky-high fuel duty is protecting the environment, whereas in reality Gordon Brown just wants to screw us for as much money as he can. [Frown]
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 03-10-2004, 08:46 AM:
 
Aye Leo, sad buy true. I not with disgust that the duty on LPG is set to rise..... Just as well my converted Range Rover had paid for itself already!
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-10-2004, 03:15 PM:
 
Just assessing the tax situation, Washington State fuel tax is presently about 28 cents per gallon, and Federal gasoline tax is about 18.4 cents per gallon. We are one of the highest in fuel taxes, so if we use WA as an example, between state and federal tax on fuel is 46.4 cents per gallon. Many states have a considerably lower state taxes on gasoline.

So, if we are getting ripped on a price of a gallon of fuel that costs $2.29.9 or more and we pay 46.4 cents per gallon, that leaves the price $1.83 per gallon. Most stations mark their fuel up about 6 cents per gallon, which means the oil distributers are charging $1.77.5 per gallon. How much the distributers buy it for is unknown, and is probably a closely guarded secret.

Something really does not add up, here. If you obtain 50 gallons of scrap vegatable oil (some places would be happy to give it to you because it costs them money to haul it off) and pay 50 cents a gallon for taxes, that still is a helluva lot cheaper that buying a gallon of fuel for $2.29.9, don't you think so?

A thought just occurred to me....I just wonder why your waist engine oil is taken for free by many recyclers? Probably to keep it out of your Diesel engine.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 03-10-2004, 03:31 PM:
 
If people were to convert to vegetable oils en masse prices would be right up there with gasoline and other current motor fuels in no time. Just look at the price of propane now.

Be thankful you're not paying $0.83 USD a gallon in taxes, like I do. [Smile]
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-10-2004, 05:03 PM:
 
You have a valid comment, Daryl. Now we know why heating oil, propane, gasoline, diesel fuel, jet aircraft engine fuel and anything else that will somehow burn in an internal combustion engine has done just that. Bottom line is still Big Oil controlling the market.

I was just offered 5 gallons a week of vegetable oil. Free. On a few websites, I noted there is a conversion kit to convert Diesel engines to burn vegetable oil. Look up the "Veggie Car" - that was the one I was talking about that made a trip across the USA on vegetable oil.

I just might get one of these conversion kits, add a few more filters to the engine, and "fill-er up" with vegetable oil. It will have to be thinned out, though. Vegetable oil by itself is too heavy for modern Diesel engines to handle. But from what I have read, it is very economical.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 03-14-2004, 11:38 AM:
 
Shoot. Just saw a San Diego, CA area gas station sign (on TV news) that had $2.799 USD posted for premium (high test).

No price increase here this week. But I imagine we'll see very little price roll back between now and the start of the summer driving season. So $3.00 a gallon is still a real possibility here some time this year.
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 03-14-2004, 11:54 AM:
 
I drove through NH and Maine this week and prices ranged from $1.61 - $2.01 /gal regular unleanded. The cheapest price seemed to be in the little hick towns... [Smile] Of course we saw what had been the cheapest thus far at $1.71 and filled up the tank - the next town over was $1.61! [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 03-14-2004, 12:36 PM:
 
1.799 here in SLC for unleaded... 1.749 with my club discount card.

Mark
 
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 03-14-2004, 03:18 PM:
 
$1.79 here at the Shell station I use and that was for the 93 octane premium gas.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 03-14-2004, 03:47 PM:
 
Today I filled up with 87 Octane (Why people use 93 I'll never fully understand - unless, of course, you're running a built head with a little higher compression ratio) at Sam's Club for $1.56/.9. I think 93 octane was $1.74 or close to it...
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 03-14-2004, 10:35 PM:
 
Hey Paul,
Don't you have to get a permit to fill your car up at the pump? [Wink]

Mark
 
Posted by Kyle Caudill (Member # 1252) on 03-15-2004, 12:08 AM:
 
2.29 in palm springs
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 03-15-2004, 01:45 AM:
 
quote:
Why people use 93 I'll never fully understand - unless, of course, you're running a built head with a little higher compression ratio
You still don't have to use higher octane gasoline with most modern OEM, hotrod or bolt-on jobs which still have knock sensors & microprocessor control of spark advance. You can run them on the cheapest stuff & it'll just dial back until there's no detonation.
 
Posted by Glen Rich (Member # 1150) on 03-15-2004, 04:57 AM:
 
Your not doing too badly.I filled the tank on my Holden (think Chev)at 99.9cents per litre (about 1/3 a US gallon)with 91 octane (regular)unleaded.Cost about $AUD60 to fill, about $US45.The petroleum companies here have a weekly price war so the price rotates from about .86cents to $1.04 per litre.They are only allowed to change the price once a day,the trick is picking which day is going to be the cheap!one.

They ,(the ubiquitous they),keep telling us about the rising cost of fuel,yet the cost of a barrel of oil (with Australia producing 90% of it's needs)is the same as it was 20 years ago.
The fact that state and commonwealth taxes are .64cents per litre when sold at .99cents per litre (we have a Goods and Service Tax so when fuel price increases so does the bloody tax) might have something to do with it.

I live out on the edge of the Perth metro area,(it used to be out in the bush but urban sprawl),my cinema is near central city ,so at least 1 and a half tanks per week.

My pet peeve!!!
 
Posted by Nicholas Suchyta (Member # 2050) on 03-15-2004, 10:48 PM:
 
I payed $1.89 today for gasoline, which rose from the $1.71 it was the other day, it usually goes up on Wednesdays or Thursdays. I'm not sure if anyone has read the proposal Robin Williams gave about the plan for peace. Here are the 2 oil related:

6. The US will make a strong effort to become self-sufficient energy-wise. This will include developing non-polluting sources of energy but will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have to cope for a while.

7. Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don't like it, we go some place else. They can go somewhere else to sell their production. (About a week of the wells filling up the storage sites would be enough.)
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-16-2004, 03:05 AM:
 
On the West Coast I guess we all can standby for a ram. I understand a major refinery in Bakersfield, CA is going to shut down because the oil wells the refinery is built upon are drying up. Supposedly, because of its location, it will soon be no longer profitable for the refinery to continue its operations due to a logistics of the nearest seaport from which the crude oil could be brought in for processing on an economical basis.

I also understand the nearest refinery that is open to the large sea-going super tankers is almost in my back yard, namely the two huge Anacortes refineries about 12 miles from where I live. The problem is much of the gasoline California (as well as other Western states) need will have to come from the Anacortes refineries as well as the major ARCO Refinery in Ferndale, Washington.

That is going to raise Cain with the price I'll have to pay (along with other Washington State and Oregon residents) because much or our product will be heading South. I am sure this will also have an adverse impact on fuel prices throughout the United States.

As I said before twice (I think) in this thread, might as well deal with it...the price of gasoline and Diesel is going to probably skyrocket by summer, not to mention how high the price will go when the Bakersfield refinery finally shuts down. [Frown]
 
Posted by Paul Cassidy (Member # 951) on 03-16-2004, 04:17 AM:
 
Local prices = Prices at most Shell service stations will now be 107.9 cents for Unleaded 91, 112.9 cents for Unleaded 96 Octane petrol and 61.9 cents per litre for Diesel.

One thing that found when getting Gas on my recent trip to the USA ,was that it took awhile to figure out how to work the gas pumps , here in NZ we normally have attendants that will Gas your car up and check to oil and water , so it took abit of asking to find out that you had to pay first and wait for the voice to tell you you can start the pump then get your change later once you fill up [Confused] I got used to it in the end .
 
Posted by Nate Lehrke (Member # 1460) on 03-16-2004, 05:04 AM:
 
I just filled up using 89 octane at $1.51 a gallon.

I can't complain about that! [Smile]
 
Posted by Sean M. Grimes (Member # 445) on 03-17-2004, 04:16 AM:
 
Fall River Mass is about 10 cents cheaper than around Syracuse New York... $1.69 for 87 in Syracuse, $1.58 in Fall River and Providence R.I.

Just as a side not to all New Englanders... is that a re-open drive in on RT 146 south? Or have been blind for the past few years? [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Erick Akers (Member # 875) on 03-19-2004, 04:27 AM:
 
I think your on the right track Paul! [thumbsup]

Just mixed up a small batch of Bio Diesel for testing purposes.

As far as it goes, a piece of cake to mix! [Big Grin]

You can get free gas if you know where to look. Just round up a couple of 55 gallon drums and head out to your local auto salvage yard.

In some states, all fluids must be removed from salvage vehicles. So they drain all the fluids, and give the gas, diesel and antifreeze away.

So far, no problems with the fuel that I have picked up, but you still have to strain it.

I process it by using a high volume universal electric fuel pump,two fuel filters and a water seperator. with an octane tester, it seems to average about 89 to 90.

Not bad at all!!! [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Erick Akers (Member # 875) on 03-19-2004, 09:50 PM:
 
Hmmmmmm,
All is quiet here,
guess everyone made a gas run to the local auto salvage yard!!! [thumbsup] [beer]
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 03-19-2004, 10:08 PM:
 
Gas is still steady here at 1.71 a gallon
 
Posted by German Marin (Member # 918) on 03-22-2004, 08:22 AM:
 
 -
This is in Abbiategrasso, Italy, on feb 16, 2004.
From up:
-Benzina (gasoline): €1.080
-Gasolio (Diesel): €0.900
-Gasolio Verde (ecological Diesel):n €1.235
All prices per litre.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 03-23-2004, 10:09 PM:
 
87 octane has been holding at around $1.58 in the Richmond, Va. area for the past couple weeks. On the cooking oil, what happens to it in the cold---around freezing or below, does the stuff thicken or congeal to the point where it won't flow? Will it mix well with petrodiesel?
 
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 03-23-2004, 11:42 PM:
 
Benzina (gasoline): €1.080

x 3.846 liters per US gallon = €4.15 / USgal

x 1.231 $/€ = $5.11 / USgal

No wonder you drive Vespas!
 
Posted by Erick Akers (Member # 875) on 03-24-2004, 03:14 AM:
 
Bill,

After reading up on the subject of conversion to vegetable oil,
I learned that tank and line heaters are required to keep things moving along.

I didn't read about a thinning agent for V.O. but someone out there may offer one.

With all of the changes that had to be made to the fuel system,
(a.k.a. much more work ) I decided to process my own test batch of Bio-diesel fuel.

Just my opinion, but I believe this is an easier way to go for me. This stuff practically makes it self! [thumbsup]

Bio diesel can be used directly without any modification, and if you cold filter the batch, all remaining congealing solids can be removed resulting in a cleaner burning and better performing fuel [Big Grin]

Or,

You could just add 1 gallon of Petro-diesel to every 5 gallons of Bio-diesel to prevent solidification of all congealing solids!!! [Razz]

There are a few forums, and web sites on the subject. I started from Paul's reference to the Veggie Car!!!

A very Arse Kickin subject, and worth while reading!!! [thumbsup]

Erick
 
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 04-09-2005, 03:04 PM:
 

It has been 381 days since the last post.


 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 04-09-2005, 03:04 PM:
 
*Bump* for Peter and Chris...

Come on down to Southern California, where the cheapest major-brand-name regular is now about $2.55 a gallon. I've heard that one particularly greedy station out in the middle of nowhere is charging $3.79/gallon for gas [Eek!] . SoCal is now home to the most expensive fuel on the US Mainland.
 
Posted by Floyd Justin Newton (Member # 1316) on 04-09-2005, 03:10 PM:
 
Jon--

Here in Phoenix gas is going for $2.61/Gal as of 12:00 Noon. [Confused]
 
Posted by Dominic Espinosa (Member # 2122) on 04-09-2005, 03:18 PM:
 
Chevron in Merced, CA: 2.79/gal
Valero trails it by around $.10
Regular unleaded of course. The premium crap is over 3 bucks.
[Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 04-09-2005, 04:10 PM:
 
Prices hit record levels in Britain last week, too: BBC Online story of 8 April 2005 reporting that petrol prices hit an all-time high of 85.6p a litre.

Boy am I glad I took the plunge and had my car converted to run on LPG (Autogas) last autumn! The tax on this fuel is much lower because it's environmentally friendlier, meaning that the fuel cost per mile was about 40% lower than for petrol at the time I converted. It's now at around 45%, I'd guess. At the time I estimated that it would take me 26-28k miles, which at September 2004 prices meant 14-16 months, to recover the cost of the conversion. If petrol stays at around 85p and LPG holds steady at the 37.9p a litre at my local filling station, that comes down to 22-23k miles and I'll be into profit by the end of this summer (even allowing for the slightly higher service costs of an LPG car).
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 04-09-2005, 04:22 PM:
 
Just crazy, aint it?

Like I was telling my fellow theatre employees that it USED to cost $2.75 to fill up a new '70 Toyota Corolla with gas @.259/gallon, and 85 cents to fill up your motorcycle back in 1970.

Course, there were a third less drivers back then. A barrel of oil out of Arabia was $7.85/barrel, no CD's, Celphones,PDA's,imports from China(mainland), computers, SUVS-no toys that we have now, back then.

Now, it's just all about greed.

Boise, Idaho $2.24/gal for 87 octane.

-Monte
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-09-2005, 04:28 PM:
 
Currently, $2.199 for regular here, probably around $2.17 in the bigger cities nearby.

Even though Montana has one of the highest gasoline taxes, we always seem to hover just a bit below the national average ($2.21 in today's paper). Not sure why.
 
Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 04-09-2005, 05:24 PM:
 
We recently sold off a panel truck due to the high cost of fuel. The last time we fueled our van $78.00 for a week of use, I was reminded I spent less than $25.00 to go from Florida to California in 1970 in my Dodge Dart [Frown] Everything has to fit my Honda Element or else [Smile] . I am afraid to give estimated freight costs due to fuel surcharges [Confused]
 
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 04-09-2005, 05:27 PM:
 
Let's see, Last Tuesday I got some gas in Los Angeles for 2.48 a gallon... The station right by my theatre (a circle K) is 2.58 a gallon. The Chevron is like $2.68. The Shell by my house was like 2.73.

Why is it that a $2 hike in a 55 gallon barrel of oil causes a 10 cent per gallon price hike?

While I am generally opposed to any government intervention the the free market, it may be time for the Justice Department to look into this.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-09-2005, 06:20 PM:
 
Some of you may have read this circulating around chain emails, but I think it belongs here.

Think a gallon of gas is expensive? This makes one think, and also puts things in perspective.

Diet Snapple
16 oz $1.29 . $10.32 per gallon

Lipton Ice Tea
16 oz $1.19 ..........$9.52 per gallon

Gatorade
20 oz $1.59 .... $10.17 per gallon

Ocean Spray
16 oz $1.25 . $10.00 per gallon

Brake Fluid
12 oz $3.15 ........... $33.60 per gallon

Vick's Nyquil
6 oz $8.35 ... $178.13 per gallon

Pepto Bismol
4 oz $3.85 .... $123.20 per gallon

Whiteout
7 oz $1.39 . . $25.42 per gallon

Scope
1.5 oz $0.99 .$84.48 per gallon

And this is the REAL KICKER...

Evian water
9 oz $1.49..........$21.19 per gallon?!

$21.19 for WATER - and the buyers don't even know the source. (Evian spelled backwards is Naive.)

So, the next time you're at the pump, be glad your car doesn't run on water, Scope, or Whiteout, or God forbid Pepto Bismal or Nyquil.

Just a little humor to help ease the pain of your next trip to the pump...
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 04-09-2005, 06:34 PM:
 
Still available for just a tad over 2.00 here in SLC at the dioscount places. Gas never seems to get as high here as it does in other states. If it gets much higher I'll be rid'in my Harley to work unless theres a call to do.

quote: Richard Fowler
Everything has to fit my Honda Element or else
We always tack on a fuel surcharge when this happens but the Honda Element seems like a good idea..... The lathe and arbor press would have to be left back in the shop though!

Mark

Mark
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 04-09-2005, 06:55 PM:
 
Between $2.05 and $2.10 / Gallon Full Service here in New Jersey. Self Serve is illegal here.
 
Posted by Kelly Skaggs (Member # 1780) on 04-09-2005, 07:32 PM:
 
Greater Cincinnati it is around 2.309 per gallon for the 87 octane and goes up .10 as the grades rise. I just got lucky and found 1 station @ 2.159. If you can call that luck. I am now starting to dislike my SUV. at a great 17 miles to gallon.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 04-09-2005, 08:18 PM:
 
One of students was lamenting last week that it cost him $55 to fill his truck. Las Vegas is running $2.59 for decaf, $2.69 for mid-grade, and $2.79 for ethyl. (Who's Ethyl?)

Cost me $5.00 to fill my '68 WV Type I when I got it in December 1973, during the first Arab oil embargo. Wasn't sure I'd make it back from LA to LV that Sunday--most of the gas stations were closed due to the shortages. I was makin' $3.95/hour as a cameraman and tape operator at KLVX Channel 10 at the time.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-09-2005, 09:31 PM:
 
Around $2.40 for regular, $2.60 for premium. This is full-service (actually mini-serve) because self-serve is illegal in Orgeon.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 04-10-2005, 12:37 AM:
 
I found a receipt in my car for a gas purchase on 1/12/05. COst was $1.61/9 for 87 octane.

Today, it is anywhere from $2.16 up to $2.69, depending on which store you go to. Now tell me this... just how in the world is gas nearly .50 more a gallon from store to store? Who's F'n who here?

Thank God for my trusty new Accord... a worst case milage stil works out at 27+ mpg... in town.. stop and go. My Yukon got 13 and our Trailblazer gets about 15. Luckily, the wife goes thru about a tank every 8-10 days. She drives 10 miles (round trip) to work and back. I drive 60.

BTW, the new job is keeping me on my toes. I miss the theatre, but then again, I don't. I've only gone back to retrieve my personals... haven't taken time to go see a movie in one of the new 'retro'd stadium' theatres. Real Estate class is also kickin my behind.. terminology out the wazooo... but it'll pay off in the long run.. [Smile]
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 04-10-2005, 12:52 AM:
 
Ya know Jason, your car is probably a pig stye if you have that old of a receipt in there.

Take it to a car wash and get it cleaned out for Christ's sake!
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 04-10-2005, 01:52 AM:
 
Yea, I work sometimes in Oregon, but I make sure that I fill up in Idaho since I don't like full serve. 2 reasons: 1-gas at full serve stations is 20 cents more than in Idaho and, 2-clowns at the full serve stations doing the fill, can't do the service right at times. Rather do it myself.

Yet, I know it's a work incentive situation in Oregon (since they don't have sales tax, in which they really need it...), thus the full-serve situation. Or, could it be a liability/insurance thing....

-Monte
 
Posted by Tracy Bellar (Member # 3049) on 04-10-2005, 02:56 AM:
 
$2.40 for regular. At this rate my lawn mower doesn't get good enough milage to cut grass weekly. I might buy a goat to put in the yard.
Seriously has anyone noticed a drop in movie attendence that they feel is related to Gas prices. Our theater relys on a lot of fairly long distance traveling customers. I think out of town trafic has dropped and local has picked up a little. Local people aren't leaving town as much and seem to be spending localy more.
 
Posted by Jacek Dejnarowicz (Member # 3062) on 04-10-2005, 07:26 AM:
 
Here in Poland
4,50$/gallon for regular [Mad]

Are you surprised?
That's why our cinema market is so weak.
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 04-10-2005, 11:12 AM:
 
Out here it is averageed at 2.25/gal for regular.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 04-10-2005, 11:48 AM:
 
I got 170 gallons of Diesel at Pilot the other day (supposedly the cheaper truck stop). It came to $450-some dollars.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-10-2005, 12:24 PM:
 
Gasoline prices across Oklahoma have finally went above $2.00 for all grades. For awhile, the 87 octane "regular" stuff was hovering at $1.99. It jumped to $2.09 a couple weeks ago. Then this past week (first full week in April), it jumped to $2.19. Currently regular grade is $2.17.
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 04-10-2005, 12:29 PM:
 
CNN had a story on their web site about how gas might be $2.35 a gal this summer. I know they are reporting 'averages' but really, everyone I know has been paying more then that for a long time...

And what's this with diesel? I thought it was supposed to be cheaper (less refining) but it costs almost as much as gas.
 
Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 04-10-2005, 01:03 PM:
 
Too bad we don't use our subsidized surplus corn to be mixed into our fuel supply instead of turning it into corn syrup to expand the average American waistline. [Roll Eyes] I was in Brazil a few years ago and driving though corn fields for several hours with a tech. He said it was grown for fuel and mixed 10 to 15% with regular fuel to save costs. His car was set up for it and was saving him considerable money in his travels......his service territory was about the size of Texas.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 04-10-2005, 01:34 PM:
 
quote: John Walsh
And what's this with diesel? I thought it was supposed to be cheaper (less refining) but it costs almost as much as gas.
Diesel's been higher for over a year now. Big trucks use a lot of it. I go through about 100 gallons a day.
 
Posted by Kyle Caudill (Member # 1252) on 04-10-2005, 02:43 PM:
 
i paid 2.95 today [Mad]
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 04-10-2005, 07:31 PM:
 
Phil.. Kiss my ass..

My car isn't a pig sty.. the receipt had actually fallen between the armrest and the psgr seat... and I dont[' often stick my head down there to see what's there...

[Razz]

BTW, I keep *all* fuel receipts.. tax purposes..
 
Posted by Dick Vaughan (Member # 540) on 04-11-2005, 03:05 AM:
 
85.9 a litre here in Bradford so that's £3.83 a uk gallon

Equivalent to $5.67 for a US gallon [thumbsdown]
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 04-11-2005, 03:52 AM:
 
I have to admonish and praise the Europeans for their auto manufacturers, since with the price of fuel there is so much higher than here in the States.

I've seen cars over there with such smaller engines-from 800cc to up to 1.1L engines-necessary for high fuel mileage and endurance per Kilo/Litre. Plus with this high price, not everybody in Europe can just jump in and pump in 55L plus of fuel at a whack per week.

These people have learned to do without sometimes and have proven it that it can be done in a fashionable manner.

Maybe, we US citizens need to take notice of our European neighbours - learn a lesson or two from them.

Stay home more and keep the cars at bay.

Reduce your fuel spending, or get a smaller car that can get better mileage.

SUV's are nice and roomy, but at 13mpg, is it worth it? Where a nice Accord, Camry, or any newer 4 cylinder midsize car can give you better mileage, where you don't have to hit the pumps every week.

Don't rely on hybrid vehicles to be the "golden ticket" for fuel savings. Yes, the small Honda and the Toyota have proven their worth as a hybrid, but when they do the hybrid thing for larger vehicles, there isn't that much difference because of the weight of the vehicle and the engine size. Plus, the price is so much greater for hybrids that money is thrown away on lease payments for these types of vehicles.

Also, with the price going up and up, I can see 55mph being posted back on the freeways. (remember the oil embargo of '74 when we experienced the first shock wave of fuel reduction..?)

Better watch out, the horse and buggy days might be returning if we don't take care of ourselves and our country.

thx-monte
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 04-11-2005, 04:49 AM:
 
quote:
Boy am I glad I took the plunge and had my car converted to run on LPG (Autogas) last autumn!
What was your cost for the conversion? Is it difficult to find places for passenger cars to fuel with LPG? How does the fuel mileage differ?

I remember back in the late 1970s or early 1980s that Morgan offered the +8 (8 cylinder lunatic version of the Morgan) in an LPG form. I got the impression it was done then for performance (although that was back in the days when a "fuel crisis" meant creation of more economical vehicles & switching to cheaper deisel fuel). I had assumed that Mogzilla was your Morgan +8, but now believe that it must be a 3-legged cat.

I have seen quite a few public transit buses & many commercial vehicles (service trucks of a fleet) here in the US having stickers stating that they run on LPG. I assume they fuel at their depots. I have never seen any place for passenger automobiles to fill with profane gas, though. Maybe Tim has an observation about the apparent availability of LPG filling stations.
 
Posted by Mike Williams (Member # 1140) on 04-11-2005, 05:50 AM:
 
quote: William Hooper
Maybe Tim has an observation about the apparent availability of LPG filling stations.

This is the same LPG campers use to run stoves right?
I remember when I lived in Miami, the Shell gas station down the street from my house sold LPG (they had a hose that came out). It kind of reminded me of the same process the CO2 vendor used to refill the CO2 in the soda machines at the theater.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 04-11-2005, 07:17 AM:
 
quote: William Hooper
What was your cost for the conversion? Is it difficult to find places for passenger cars to fuel with LPG? How does the fuel mileage differ?
The conversion cost just over £1,100. I started to seriously investigate the idea after a friend had her car done by this place, about 20 miles up the road from me. I haven't done the MPG sums, but the average cost per mile for my car (Ford Mondeo Zetec 2.0 litre) at the time I converted and based on 80p a litre of petrol/gasoline was 10.2p. On LPG at 37.9p a litre, the per mile cost is 5.9p. That works out at a 42% fuel cost saving per mile after the conversion. The MPG is about 15-20% lower for LPG than for petrol (at a rough guess I was getting 37ish on petrol and am getting 30-32 on LPG), but the litre for litre cost differential is about half.

Again, based on these figures, I worked out that the break even point would come at 32-34k miles after the conversion. I do 25-28k miles a year; therefore I was looking at 14-15 months. Given that I was planning to keep the car for another 2-3 years, the sums added up. There are also slightly higher service costs to factor in: an LPG car needs its oil changed every 5k miles even if the normal service interval is 10k, and the gas system needs a service every 20k miles, costing around £50.

Since I converted 15k miles ago, petrol has gone up by 5p a litre, while LPG has held steady. I haven't done the detailed sum again, but reckon at a rough guess that the break even point will now come at around 30k, meaning around October/November in my case. This assumes that petrol doesn't come significantly down from 85p and LPG doesn't start going up.

The two major drawbacks are the gas tank capacity and, as you point out, availability of filling stations. I could get 450 miles from a tank of petrol (62 litres), but only around 330 on gas (tank rated water capacity=70 litres, more like 60 allowing for expansion room). So now I have to fill up at least twice a week, whereas previously I'd get away with one refuel in most weeks. There is one LPG station directly on my route to work, and two others which involve a 3 or 5 mile detour. But on long drives to places I don't normally go, it is a case of looking up the location of some filling stations on the LPG Association's website. I'd guess that around 1 in 10 filling stations have an LPG pump, most of them in rural areas where high mileage drivers tend to live. The car will still run on petrol as well as LPG, so if I did run out I could just switch over: but so far this hasn't happened.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 04-11-2005, 07:34 AM:
 
The problem is that when significant numbers of people start using LPG for road transport then the tax on it will probably be increased to bring the pump price comparable to that of petrol.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 04-11-2005, 10:57 AM:
 
That thought occurred to me, too. I guess the government is in a Catch 22 situation: it offers the tax break in the first place to encourage environmental friendliness (LPG produces 70% less carbon and a lot fewer other nasty substances than petrol/gasoline, apparently), but if it succeeds in its aim then the government is facing a big loss of tax revenue. But there again, if a substantial number of people did have an LPG kit installed and then the government whacked up the fuel duty on LPG, it would potentially be pissing off a significant number of voters. But now we're veering towards politics...
 
Posted by Gracia L. Babbidge (Member # 582) on 04-11-2005, 12:30 PM:
 
I spent about $2.20/gal the other day, and I saw other stations with prices (for regular) hovering around $2.25/gal. When about two-three weeks ago, we were seeing prices under $2/gal. I can't help but feel like we're being bled. [uhoh]
...and we will likely see a nasty hike in fuel prices when tourist season fully sets in! [Mad]

The very minimal nature of the public transport in this state sucks bumby! [thumbsdown]
 
Posted by Roger Manning Jr (Member # 1560) on 04-11-2005, 01:33 PM:
 
I paid $2.45 gal. at Costco today cost me over $70.00 to fill up.Other places are about$2.75 for reg. It will be over $3.00 here before summer. We have not seen it for under $2.00 in over a year.
Roger
 
Posted by Mike Williams (Member # 1140) on 04-11-2005, 02:10 PM:
 
If the costs get too high, you can always do this and get your fill ups at your local McDonalds.
 
Posted by Adam Wilbert (Member # 1184) on 04-11-2005, 02:50 PM:
 
Biodiesel is awesome. There are a couple of gas stations around me that are stocking this now, and probably half a dozen privately operated trucks that will come to your house and fill up your car. The price is about a nickle more a gallon that unleaded, but as demand goes up, they expect the price to fall with economies of production.

When I left Phoenix, the city had just converted most of its fleet vehicles to CNG or propane (i think)and transit purchased a fleet of Liquid natural gas buses. They were in the process of building public alt-fuel stations that offered CNG, LNG, Propane and ethanol. Then I move to "green" Washington, and we only have yahoos trucking fry oil around. [Roll Eyes]

BTW, the hybrid accord rocks. More HP than the standard, and it drops down to three cylinders at freeway speeds!

we should also post our average MPG here. I really can't feel sorry for people if they're driving cars that only get 11 miles per gallon. 33 +/-2 mpg for me.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 04-12-2005, 01:02 AM:
 
quote: Adam Wilbert
we should also post our average MPG here
..and I'll start:
'99 Suzuki Esteen Wgn. 1.6L 28mpg town 31-34mpg hwy
'01 Saturn LS-2 sedan. 2.2L 24mpg town - 32mpg hwy

-Monte
 
Posted by Christian Volpi (Member # 2370) on 04-12-2005, 07:54 AM:
 
I have no clue what I paid for gas the last time I filled up. I don't even bother to look. Whether it's 50 cents a gallon or $5 a gallon, I still need to buy it.
 
Posted by Gracia L. Babbidge (Member # 582) on 04-12-2005, 08:08 AM:
 
My '93 Subaru Legacy (wagon) gets about 25 miles per gallon.

Running with the heat or the AC on drops it down to about 20-21 mpg.

Winter here is too damn cold to go without heat, but I can manage without the AC in the summer - just crack open the windows & the sun/moon roof!

And yes, driving with open windows has much less of an impact on your fuel economy than using the dang air conditioner!
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 04-12-2005, 11:38 AM:
 
No car these days, so really really good gas mileage via city bus, bike, walking, and as of this week, scooter. I imagine the scooter will get great mileage, on the order of 100 miles/gallon or so, plus no license, registration, or insurance required.

Repeating 'Vegas gas prices for this week at the corner Chevron:
Regular - $2.53
Mid-grade - $2.63
Premium - $2.73
 
Posted by Kyle Caudill (Member # 1252) on 04-12-2005, 03:05 PM:
 
Find a gas station on an Indian Reservation. Paid 2.54 for a gallon today at Cabazon. Everywhere else here is 2.80
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 04-12-2005, 08:04 PM:
 
In central Va. Reg. self serve $2.15, mid $2.25, prem. $2.25.
Cheapest I've ever paid was 22.9 cents back in '63 and '64 for regular. If you have a diesel and are will to cheat the govt. a little you can use #2 furnace fuel which in much of the U.S. is the same as diesel. It has red dye though so if you get caught with it in a vehicle tank you'll be screwed. An acquaintance who owns a service company that does diesel fuel system work says the dye has no effect
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 04-12-2005, 08:23 PM:
 
As of today, the cheapest gas in the city of Boston is $2.259 per gallon for standard-grade unleaded. Not sure on the most expensive, but it's probably about $.20/gallon more.

Ouch.

I remember paying $.999/gallon back in 1998 in Virginia, which was great because I was a poor college student then. [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 04-12-2005, 09:11 PM:
 
The cheapest I found in Attleboro, MA is $2.11/gal, the most expensive is $2.22. Doesn't seem that bad compared to other parts of the country. [Mad]
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 04-12-2005, 09:53 PM:
 
I watched the price of fuel drop from $2.16 on my way to work to $2.12 at lucnh at the same station. Regular unleaded...

I paid $2.10 this morning at Sam's.

2003 Honda Accord (4cyl) avg 27mpg in town. Haven't done hwy trip yet, but should realize around 35 or so hwy.. :-)
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 04-13-2005, 12:15 AM:
 
Like me, for instance: I went to Albertson (and used my "preferred" card to save three cents..lol) to get gas for the lawn mower and trimmer. Paid 12 bucks for a 5 gallon container full. Brother, I remember paying a buck and a half for the same amount in the late '60's ( 26.9c/gal.)

When the oil embargo hit in '74 and gas prices actually doubled, from 27.9c, to 55,9c I knew that this was the beginning of the end.

three and a half gallons for a buck went quite some distance for us "Bug" owners back then.

-Monte
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 04-13-2005, 03:11 AM:
 
quote: Gracia L. Babbidge
My '93 Subaru Legacy (wagon) gets about 25 miles per gallon.
Running with the heat or the AC on drops it down to about 20-21 mpg.

Does it have an additional resistance heater to speed heat output?

Usually, the heater in a car doesn't affect gas mileage. It just diverts some of the water heated by the engine from its destination of being cooled in the radiator up front to a little radiator warming the inside of the car.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 04-14-2005, 02:10 AM:
 
Of course, in another 390 days or whatever when this thread wakes up again, we can look back on how these will be the good old days of cheap gasoline

The price of oil and oil derived products behave more or less as dictated by supply and demand, and global rate of oil consumed continues to increase year on year, and the global supply rate is having difficulty keeping up, with no evidence that either of these factors is going to change soon.

Diesel, 26mpg, 1.12NZD/Litre, 3.72USD/Gallon.

Leo would like it here - LPG is available at every forecourt.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 04-14-2005, 02:43 AM:
 
Does that mean that LPG use is widespread in New Zealand, then?

Thinking a bit more on Stephen's point about the tax concession, I'd guess that mass conversions to LPG are probably unlikely here, and that it will probably remain a niche market. Basically, in order for it to make economic sense to have an LPG kit installed, you need (i) to be driving at least 20k miles per year, compared to a UK average of 11k per vehicle, (ii) those need to be mainly high-speed miles, as a lot of the fuel efficiency of LPG compared to petrol/gasoline is lost in urban stop-start driving, (iii) you need to be planning to keep the converted car for at least 2-3 years, and (iv) there has to be a reason not to go for Diesel, because there isn't much difference in the fuel cost per mile between an efficient Diesel engine and a typical petrol engine running on LPG. In my case it was because I could afford the LPG kit but not a Diesel car which offers the comfort and reliability of what I've got at the moment.

Does NZ have a lot more cars being sold with factory-installed LPG kits (here this isn't standard on any production car, and is only a factory option on a small number of models) rather than retrofitted ones, which account for most of Britain's LPG vehicles?
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 04-14-2005, 09:00 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Does NZ have a lot more cars being sold with factory-installed LPG kits (here this isn't standard on any production car, and is only a factory option on a small number of models) rather than retrofitted ones, which account for most of Britain's LPG vehicles?
In the half of NZ I live in, new cars here are more rare than in the UK, we mostly buy second hand motors imported by the roro ferryload from Japan. I've not seen any advertising for LPG cars though.

I've also never seen a car filling up with LPG. I see the odd car with an LPG sticker on the road. So my guess is there are very few LPG cars here.

Every forecourt has an LPG pump because every forecourt has the ability to fill LPG gas bottles, which is what every Kiwi has for the BBQ, rather than calor gas as used in the UK.

The other thing that is different here than the UK is fuel tax.

Only petrol is taxed at the pump here, all other fuels are sold without tax. If you have a non-petrol car you must buy "road usage charges" by the 1000KM, so diesel, bio-anything, electric, all get taxed through that method. The advantage is there is only one kind of diesel, and its fairly cheap, so handy for farmers etc, rather than duty paid road diesel and red agricultural diesel as used in the UK.

Of course, we do other things differently here with LPG too, check out http://www.asciimation.co.nz/beer
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 04-14-2005, 10:46 PM:
 
quote: Bill Enos
cheat the govt. a little you can use #2 furnace fuel which in much of the U.S. is the same as diesel. It has red dye though so if you get caught with it in a vehicle tank you'll be screwed.
Yes, and I've been checked for that, too. Revenue agents randomly setup at scale houses and take samples. They're serious. Fortunately, I always fuel at the chain truck stops on a company card, so I can only get the green stuff.
 
Posted by Matt Kerekes (Member # 2777) on 04-14-2005, 10:55 PM:
 
In Tulare, CA which is between Fresno and Bakersfield, gas is about $2.50/gallon. I was in LA the other day and gas was $2.73/gallon.
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 04-15-2005, 12:06 AM:
 
I just found out some news, I'm going to be buying my dad's car. A '78 Trans Am with a worked 400CI engine. I'm gonna have fun at the pumps [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 04-15-2005, 01:54 AM:
 
I thought that LPG would get a good start in the USA from the bolt-on boy racer crowd for the same reason Morgan used it for the Morgan +8: LPG is about 100 octane. Step up that turbo boost, shave those heads some more, etc. Of course, if you can't be certain you'll be able to fuel up on the interstate, it's not very attractive.
 
Posted by Jeremy Jorgenson (Member # 2989) on 06-01-2005, 01:03 AM:
 
I was just going through pictures on my phone... here is the most I've ever paid for gas (April 22, 2005). This was in downtown Chicago. I saw it for more, in Baker, CA back in 2004, but I didn't have to buy at that point.

 -
 
Posted by Chris Brown (Member # 2800) on 06-01-2005, 01:25 AM:
 
Ouch Jeremy! I thought I was in bad shape here at $2.35 until I came across this thread...back in Binghamton where I go to school it's at $2.15 or so. Since I have an SUV I get raped on gas mileage as it is, so I'll take any break I can get!
 
Posted by Dieter Depypere (Member # 3184) on 06-01-2005, 01:32 AM:
 
Gas is very cheap in the US. Here, in Austria, you pay for a litre 1 euro (1 gallon is about 4.5 litres!) So a gallon would be around € 4.5, which would be around $6/gal.

Before I forget: This price for gas is far the cheapest one in Europe!
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 06-01-2005, 02:09 AM:
 
Dieter, there are two types of gallons; the imperial one is about 4.5 litres, but the US one is only about 3.8 litres, so their prices are not quite as cheap as they seem, but arestill much less than in Europe.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-01-2005, 02:15 AM:
 
I was in Wyoming over the weekend (Big Horn Mountains) and saw gas priced at $2.699 [Eek!] at a resort station.

In the real world, it was at $2.179.

When we got home to Montana, it was $2.239 here in town. That's about 17¢ less than it was 2 weeks ago.
 
Posted by Dieter Depypere (Member # 3184) on 06-01-2005, 02:18 AM:
 
Oh... sorry... But Europe is still twice as expensive [Frown]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-01-2005, 06:35 AM:
 
I've noticed that it has come down quite a bit in the last month, though. A litre of unleaded was around 86p (equivalent to 1.25 euros per litre or $5.85 per US gallon) a month or so ago; typical prices now are around 81p (1.18 euros or $5.54). Not that this bothers me, driving an LPG powered car with gas at 37.2p a litre! [Smile]
 
Posted by Jason Greek (Member # 3159) on 06-01-2005, 07:42 AM:
 
gas here dropped about a week and a half ago to $0.909 per litre and has stayed steady, i think the stability might have something to do with the provincial government talking about bringing back a regulation on gas prices... it hasn't been this cheap in awhile, I'm not complaining...
 
Posted by Bernard Tonks (Member # 809) on 06-01-2005, 10:34 AM:
 
Petrol is still around 88p a litre in this part of Surrey. I was in Southampton yesterday and filled up for nearly 81p a litre at Sainsbury's.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 06-01-2005, 09:15 PM:
 
$1.89 for 87octane at Sam's Club this morning.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 06-03-2005, 01:29 AM:
 
Diesel $2.39 in Sturbridge, MA
quote: Leo Enticknap
A litre of unleaded was..(equivalent to ...$5.85 per US gallon)
Leo, I sure hope that typical wages there are correspondingly elevated.
 
Posted by German Marin (Member # 918) on 06-05-2005, 12:14 PM:
 
Italy: €1.20 a litre of gasoline.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-03-2005, 10:36 AM:
 
Light sweet crude hit a record high of $62.47 in New York this morning, so sez BBC Radio, amid worries that King Fahd's death and the Iranian nuclear issue could disrupt supplies. The big price rises of a month or two ago are certainly starting to come through at the pump now: even the big supermarkets which sell petrol as a loss leader are charging 89p/litre ish (£4.05/$7.20 per US gallon), and the more expensive rural filling stations are up to 93p ish (£4.24/$7.54). We're told that pump price changes happen around 4-6 weeks after crude oil price changes: if that's true and crude stays above $60/barrel, I guess we'll be paying a fiver a gallon before too much longer (we probably already are if the gallons are imperial ones). [Frown]

I'm glad I don't run an airline!
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-03-2005, 11:16 AM:
 
My rig (2001 Nissan Pathfinder) requires premium. The high was around $2.65 a couple months ago, then it fell back to about $2.40, then quickly rose back up to about $2.65 again where it is now. [Eek!]

There was an article in the paper recently about how SUV sales are falling, and dealers are overloaded with trade-ins. It's a buyer's market now for SUVs, if you don't mind the cost of filling them up.

I'm amazed at how many Toyota Prius hybrids there are on the roads around here. They seem to be multiplying like, uh, Rabbits. [Roll Eyes] They're in such high demand on the used market that used ones with low miles can be sold for more than new ones. Apparently there are people who latch onto a new Prius, drive it for a few thousand miles, then sell it used at a tidy profit.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-03-2005, 12:42 PM:
 
Interesting - for the first time last week I actually had to queue at the LPG pump, and am noticing more and more cars driving around with gas fillers next to the normal petrol cap. That says to me that more people are getting their cars converted. I saw my first Prius a month or so ago, reversing out of a space in a car park. I thought 'Why is that car moving without making any noise at all?'; and then noticed that it was a Prius. Once those things become a regular sight moving silently along urban roads at 30mph, I wonder if there'll be a spate of accidents involving pedestrians who are expecting to hear engine noises.
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 08-03-2005, 03:04 PM:
 
As far as I know, hybrid cars aren't really cost-effective yet. They cost more to buy and get roughly twice the gas mileage as "normal" cars, but for the typical user who might drive 10-15,000 miles per year, the fuel savings don't pay for the extra purchase cost over the first 100k miles.

Also, since they're so new, hybrid maintenance costs are an unknown. Eventually, the batteries will need to be replaced, which is an expensive procedure (and used lead-acid batteries need to be disposed of as hazardous waste). The gasoline engines get less wear than on a standard gasoline-only car, but other aspects of the vehicle are more complex and may require more attention.

For the most part, anyone who thinks that buyinga hybrid car (as opposed to a standard-size sedan equivalent) will save money isn't likely to see this actually happen with the current generation of cars.

I'm not in the market for a car (and, hopefully, won't be for several years...and, then, it will still be a used car), but I'd love to be proven wrong on this.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 08-03-2005, 03:23 PM:
 
Gas is around $2.41 on the low end here, I filled up at a plce for $2.45 a gallon, cost me $39 for my Ford Escort [Frown] It's sad considering that's what filling a Suburban cost a few years ago probably. I'm in the market for a new/used car now so I'll definitely be paying attention to the MPG issue.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 08-03-2005, 03:27 PM:
 
Some states are offering incentives to buy hybrids. Nevada and California both offer tax breaks, and California also allows hybrids to drive in HOV lanes with less than the required number of occupants. So some places are trying to help reduce the cost of jumping into a hybrid.

Hybrids are a great first step towards weaning us off of gasoline. Next will come fuel cells and hydrogen-powered cars. The City of Las Vegas is already running some hydrogen cars as a part of their fleet, part of a long-term test for Honda.

As for me, I'm looking for one of those 49.5cc gas scooters as I'm tired of depending on the undependable and meager bus service here. Better than 100mpg, 30mph top speed, street legal, no registration or insurance required.

A gallon of regular is running anywhere from $2.37 (Arco) to $2.59 (Sam's Club non-member) here this week.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-03-2005, 04:12 PM:
 
I suspect the vast majority of Prius owners here in the Eugene area are mainly interested in making a statement. The Prius screams "Look at me! I care about the environment!" There's also the novelty factor. Long-term cost of ownership [read: economy and reliability] is probably way down the list of owner concerns. Toyota did have a recall of some sort on the Prius recently, but I haven't heard anything at all about them being generally unreliable. Time will tell though.

At least for now, Toyota seems to be cleaning all the other automakers' collective clocks in bringing an actual honest-to-god hybrid to market and making people want to buy it.
 
Posted by Rick Raskin (Member # 1561) on 08-03-2005, 04:55 PM:
 
2.19 here. Further North, upwards of 2.45.
 
Posted by Peter Kerchinsky (Member # 1098) on 08-03-2005, 05:36 PM:
 
Average in the Seattle area $2.49 regular unleaded and climbing.
 
Posted by Rick Hunter (Member # 1606) on 08-03-2005, 06:06 PM:
 
Down here, about $1.25 a litre. That is us$3.66 a us gallon
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 08-03-2005, 06:14 PM:
 
USD$4.75/US gallon here. $5.30 for premium. I pay less for 100LL. I think I'll go buy a Hummer H2.
 
Posted by Dave Macaulay (Member # 813) on 08-05-2005, 10:00 AM:
 
Jeez, Darryl! You should drive to Toronto - only USD$2.95/US Gal (or so, the price changes every few minutes) here.
Is it really $1.60 a litre in Hamilton? I may fill up a few drums and open up a bootleg fillin' station!
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 08-05-2005, 12:36 PM:
 
Oops! I divided with a currency value I should have multiplied with. [Embarrassed]

Hamilton is still usually more expensive than Toronto though, despite being closer to the Petro Canada refinery than Toronto is.

It was about USD$3.20/US gal for regular USD$3.57/US gal for premium (CDN$1.03/litre and CDN$1.15/litre) the other day.

I've been buying fuel at around 1am lately as it's often 10 cents less a litre at night for some crazy reason. I noticed the Sunoco on Main St W in Westdale was at 96 cents/l this morning, so I guess it's similar to Toronto right now.
 
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 08-05-2005, 01:24 PM:
 
This December I may be in the market for a small SUV, say perhaps a Pontiac Aztek, Hundai Santa Fe, or Buick Rendezvous - don't know yet. I figure we can keep the miles low as it won't be going too many places beyond five or six miles from home.

Here, gas prices for regular unleaded range between $2.21 - $2.25 depending on which station one uses. The Get-Go station in the more fortunate suburbs of our fair city is charging $2.25, while its twin in the working class neighborhood is asking only $2.23 for the same fuel. Corporate compassion I guess. Service sucks at both stations anyway.

quote: Leo Enticknap
Light sweet crude hit a record high of $62.47 in New York this morning, so sez BBC Radio, amid worries that King Fahd's death and the Iranian nuclear issue could disrupt supplies.
This is just smoke and mirrors. Fahd has been on his deathbed since his stroke in 1995, and all of a sudden prices jump the day he dies. Tell me that wasn't planned. Same thing about Iran, all smoke and mirrors there too.

quote: Paul Mayer
Better than 100mpg, 30mph top speed, street legal, no registration or insurance required.
Until Nevada finds out there is an untapped "pool" (no pun intended) of money they're missing out on. Yeah for state government!
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-05-2005, 02:32 PM:
 
Yesterday in Elko, NV it was 2.42.9 a gallon for regular at Maverick which was the cheapest...always is in Nevada/Utah, here 2.23.9 a gallon for regular about 20 cents cheaper a gallon. Nevada might not have sales tax but they sure do have GAS tax! In Lovell, WY a couple of weeks ago it was 1.89.9 a gallon, under 2.00! Hi-Octane there was less expensive than regular was here in SLC. Wyoming is by far the cheapest for gas and has very little gas tax at all because the state is filthy rich from all the mining and oil.

Mark
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 08-05-2005, 02:45 PM:
 
Yea, while I was in SLC last week, I hit gas at 2.13/gal. Then back to Idaho it climbs up 12 cents to 2.25/gal in Boise. Gas is always 5 to 10 cents cheaper in SLC than it is in Boise. Course, SLC has all of those refineries on the north end of town.

True, hitting Wendover, fuel shot up to 2.40something in NV.

-monte
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 08-05-2005, 03:49 PM:
 
Noticed on the way to NJ that it was $2.62 in the DC metro area... it is around $2.4ish here in Cape May..
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-05-2005, 05:47 PM:
 
Earlier this week, 87 octane "regular" was $2.19 per gallon. Today the price jumped to $2.31. I bought $30 worth of gas for my truck a couple days ago (pre pay). Now I wish I would have just filled up the thing.
[Mad]
 
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 08-05-2005, 06:34 PM:
 
2.59 in the Cali central valley... We would use about 25% less gas if the traffic engineers could figure out how to sync the traffic lights...
 
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 08-05-2005, 06:44 PM:
 
It just jumped from $2.13/gal in Atlanta to about $2.23/gal yesterday.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 08-05-2005, 06:50 PM:
 
$2.319 here right now.

Yesterday, we were in Sundance, Wyoming -- very small town, 1100 people, saw three different gas stations with prices of $2.279, $2.399, and $2.489. The first two were right next to each other!
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 08-05-2005, 07:02 PM:
 
I paid $2.25 yesterday for 85 octane, the lifeblood of my awesome vehicle.
 
Posted by Paul Goulet (Member # 297) on 08-05-2005, 07:37 PM:
 
I paid $2.39 in North Attleboro,Massachusetts. I cross over into Mass from RI because it is cheaper then RI gas!
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-06-2005, 12:11 AM:
 
I've been swearing for months that if gasoline hit $2.50 per gallon I was going to buy a bicycle and start using that for my 6-mile each way commute.

I may have to make good on that promise soon.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-06-2005, 03:55 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I've been swearing for months...
Me too. [Razz]
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 08-06-2005, 04:09 AM:
 
It's hit over £1.00/litre in parts of Scotland, I'm glad I run my Range Rover on LPG which has remained at £.40/litre or even lower in places.
 
Posted by Dieter Depypere (Member # 3184) on 08-06-2005, 05:51 AM:
 
Recently, gas prices have risen up to EUR 1.10 per litre (EUR 4.18 per us gallon). In Italy or Germany even 1.25 or 1.30 per liter (would be a good five bucks per gallon).
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-06-2005, 09:56 AM:
 
Premium is now at $2.70+ here.

When the weather is good I try to ride my bike to work several times a week if not every day. It's about 4 miles and a pleasant ride mostly along the Willamette River bikepaths. The killer is riding home though. If it's in the 90s the extended grade I have to climb in the last half mile makes it not much fun.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-06-2005, 11:11 AM:
 
quote: Pete Naples
I'm glad I run my Range Rover on LPG which has remained at £.40/litre or even lower in places.
37.2 at my local Morrison's, but the average is more like 40. I've noticed two new filling stations (Asda in York and a place in a village on the A59) have installed LPG pumps in the last month.
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 08-06-2005, 04:58 PM:
 
Indeed Leo, Morrisons is the place, the nearest one to me is pumping it out at an astounding 29.9p/l, it's a 30 miles round trip so I make it on the way to or from other places.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-07-2005, 04:41 AM:
 
Might that low price have something to do with the proximity to Aberdeen, where all the oil comes ashore? I've never seen LPG as low as 29p: there's a place in Scarborough which does it for around the 34 mark, but as I very rarely go there (only to visit a friend, probably around two or three times a year), it's not worth making the detour just for that.
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 08-07-2005, 05:24 AM:
 
Falkirk isn't really close to Aberdeen, however it is close to Grangemouth refinery, but I've always found that doesn't equate. Shell garage at Kincardine Bridge is almost within peeing distance of Grangemouth and is one of the most expensive around!

There's a couple of other LPG sites in the Falkirk area, perhaps it's a way of getting all the trade?
 
Posted by Dave Macaulay (Member # 813) on 08-07-2005, 09:13 AM:
 
Well, luckily enough I live in the middle of one of Toronto's price war zones, so we generally have the lowest prices in the area right on the corner.
"Lowest" means little when it's still ridiculously expensive.
If there's a lineup at the cheapest place I can go next door and pay about $1.00 a tank less (2%) and not wait at all. People probably spend more idling in line than they save.
 
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-07-2005, 12:50 PM:
 
I propose a 100% excise tax on the book value of every vehicle that doesn't get at least 25 miles to the gallon and 200% for those that get less than 10!

When I see some idiot driving around in a Hummer, getting 7 miles to the gallon, (Going downhill) my blood boils! Why should some asshole be allowed to use FIVE TIMES MORE GAS than me and get away with it, simply because he can afford it!?

My car gets 30 miles to the gallon. If I drive conservatively and shift at the right points I can milk it out to 35 MPG. Gas hogs only make the price of fuel more expensive for everybody else! [Mad]
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 08-07-2005, 01:43 PM:
 
Governments who build their countries economic system on taxes raised in the name of environmental protection are what pushes up prices Randy, the treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up. It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens? All that revenue ceases pouring into the states coffers, and the house of cards built on it collapses. It's the same reason they don't really want you to give up smoking and drinking.

I'd love not have to use my car almost everywhere I go, but certainly in the UK there is no viable alternative. Public transport is unreliable, expensive, doesn't serve a lot of the community and is unsafe. I find the current UK taxation scheme on company cars particularly unfair for people like me. I cannot do my job without a vehicle, there is no way I can carry me and all the tools, test kit etc from place to place any other way. I didn't ask for the car, I don't use it when not working, yet I'm taxed to the hilt, in essence I pay do to do my job! I have no beef with taxing people who are given a flash car, have fuel provided for them and drive 1 1/4 miles to and from work each day, but for someone like me who is provided with a modest vehicle, only gets fuel for business use paid for and has to drive hundreds of miles a day it seems a tad unbalanced.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-07-2005, 05:48 PM:
 
quote: Pete Naples
Governments who build their countries economic system on taxes raised in the name of environmental protection are what pushes up prices. [...] Randy, the treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up.
An increase in energy taxation is really an increase in direct taxation in all but name. As far as road fuel goes, even if you don't drive yourself you will buy goods which have been delivered by lorry and you will buy the services of people who have to drive to work.

quote: Pete Naples
It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens? All that revenue ceases pouring into the states coffers, and the house of cards built on it collapses.
I'm not entirely sure I agree there: burning fossil fuel energy is something which is essential for survival in a developed world country: so if the price goes up (either due to market forces or taxation), people are going to cut back on other sorts of consumer spending. For example, now that gas price increases have put a tenner or so on my quarterly bill, I'm going to find that money by not going to the pub one night or not buying a book or a DVD or two: I won't be finding it by letting the flat go cold in winter. Likewise, I have to get to work, so if the price of LPG goes up, I'll just have to pay it and cut back on non-essential spending. So the state continues to get its cut: though granted, it may then lose some of that in the form of lower VAT on other spending.

quote: Pete Naples
It's the same reason they don't really want you to give up smoking and drinking.
Agreed entirely. If it's agreed that tobacco is an unacceptably destructive drug, why faff around with a taxation system to offset the financial cost of its health effects and silly laws that ban you from smoking in pubs, apart from those which don't serve food; and just outlaw the stuff? Probably because that would be a hellish difficult law to enforce: people would just smuggle tobacco in from Europe, just as they smuggled booze across the border from Canada when the United States bought in prohibition in the '20s. But even so, there are obviously double standards going on.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 08-07-2005, 08:13 PM:
 
Guys, the purposes of governments are to take money from everyone and use it for purposes they decide. Theres nothing 'fair'or 'equitible', its where they chose to grab the cash from.

quote: Pete Naples
... treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up. It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens?
What happens is "demand destruction" and is a necessary step towards balancing the supply side and the demand side. Prior to that happening there will be lots of people for whom the choice will be fuel or food, and once they cant afford fuel they cant get to work. As usual, it is those with least money upon whom this will fall the hardest and the soonest.
 
Posted by Dave Macaulay (Member # 813) on 08-07-2005, 08:57 PM:
 
quote:
Why should some asshole be allowed to use FIVE TIMES MORE GAS than me and get away with it, simply because he can afford it!?
Looks like you answered your own question.
 
Posted by Kelly Skaggs (Member # 1780) on 08-08-2005, 06:21 PM:
 
Well today in Greater Cincinnati the gas prices have hit $2.50 a gallon. They have gone up .35 cents in less then a week. [puke]
 
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-08-2005, 08:20 PM:
 
Well, if they can afford the gas then they can afford to pay the exicse tax. Can't they?

If it wasn't for the fact that the government let the auto makers weasel them into classifying S.U.V.s as "Trucks" instead of "Passenger Vehicles" they WOULD be subject to minimum fuel mileage standards and we probably would be in this situation in the first place. OR at least, the situation wouldn't be as bad as it is.

How about we set the price of gas according to the formula:

$17.00/gal. - (average highway mileage of the vehicle * 0.5)

The computer in the pump scans the bar code under the V.I.N. sticker near the fuel filler cap then sets the price according to a preprogrammed database of vehicle mileage statistics.

Any attempt to thwart the system results in permanent revocation of the vehicle's registration privileges. Vehicles used to make "Straw Purchases" are also subject to revocation.

Okay. I realize how unrealistic that is but it's a dramatic way to illustrate my point. People who drive gas guzzlers decrease the supply of gasoline for others and drive up prices. Putting some kind of punitive measure in place for gas guzzling vehicles would:

A) Slow the growth of sales of gas guzzling vehicles.
B) Lower gas prices for EVERYBODY.
C) Decrease pollution. (Gas guzzlers usually pollute more, too.)

It's a Win-Win situation, AFAIC. The government tried to do it 25 years ago, the LAST time we had gas shortages but they let the auto makers weasel them into relaxing the standards.

We need to put those laws back in place to make up for lost time!

Oh! And FLEET VEHICLES should get tax breaks! Sharing vehicles is good for gas consumption, reduces the number of cars on the road AND reduces pollution REGARDLESS of the average fuel mileage of the vehicle in question. DOUBLE tax breaks for fleet vehicles which meet minimum fuel mileage standards would be even BETTER!
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-08-2005, 11:05 PM:
 
87 octane in Lawton relaxed a bit over the latter part of last week and through the weekend to $2.29 per gallon. To start off the work week, it kicked up to $2.38 per gallon. That's an all time high for this area.

Crude oil hit $64 per barrel today. The stock market still isn't reacting much. Add a few more dollars and I think the economy will. There's a lot of other stuff that has been getting too pricey. Gasoline prices are just a highly visible tipping point. You can't drive through your town without seeing some gas price changer sign reminding you of the expense.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-09-2005, 03:36 AM:
 
Driving into work just now there was an interesting piece on the Today programme (you can hear it here, though this link will only be good for 24 hours from the date of this post), asking why the oil price rises dont' seem to have buggered the British economy in the way that they did during the last spike in the '70s. The tentative conclusions were (i) interest rates are a lot lower, which are holding off the inflationary pressures which exacerbated the effect of oil price rises then, (ii) fierce competition, especially from India and China, is preventing retailers from passing on energy price rises to consumers in manufactured goods, and (iii) the slowdown in some parts of the economy caused by more expensive oil is being offet by the higher profits of oil companies, which is keeping the stock market healthy.

The only real sign of trouble ahead is that house prices are either flatlining or going down slightly, depending on whose figures you believe. But given that they've inflated so far out of line with earnings in the last 9 years, that had to happen anyway. To be honest I can't really work out why higher fuel prices don't seem to have hit other sectors of the economy. People only earn so much, and if they are pouring a higher proportion of it into their cars, then surely they must be spending less elsewhere. If I hadn't had my car converted to run on LPG last November (which is rapidly starting to look like the best investment I ever made), I reckon I'd be paying around £150 a month on petrol, compared to £110-120 at the time I converted my car (the monthly LPG bill comes in at around £65 [Cool] ). So I'd have had to save that by cutting back on leisure spending.

Something doesn't seem right, and I'm not sure what.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 08-09-2005, 06:56 AM:
 
Perhaps the British economy isn't buggered yet.

I cant recall the UK prices for fuel back in the '70s, but both the barrel price and the US pump price has yet to reach the 70s price after inflation is taken into account.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-11-2005, 12:07 PM:
 
Crude oil hit $66 per barrel today.
[Mad]

quote: Leo Enticknap
To be honest I can't really work out why higher fuel prices don't seem to have hit other sectors of the economy. People only earn so much, and if they are pouring a higher proportion of it into their cars, then surely they must be spending less elsewhere.
Here's what all the money chasing MBAs don't want people to mention: many millions of Americans are paying their bills with borrowed money and equity cashed out of their homes. The pricing structure of our economy has very wrongfully changed to assume that money is real income when it is extremely the reverse. People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.

The insane run up in home prices is largely due to speculators trading property like they were trading baseball cards. Truly, prices in most markets in the United States are hyper-inflated far beyond what the market would actually bear if we were talking about mortgages supported by real income. Our whole damned economy is effectively on a credit card. It's going to be ugly when that housing market bubble pops. You're going to see lots of people "upside down" owing a lot more money than their house is actually worth.

Speculation, rather than market reality, has pushed oil to very wrong, over priced levels. This is another bubble that can pop. I hope some of those folks rolling in oil drilling rights royalty money don't go changing their lifestyles as if that extra income is going to be dependable. I don't think it will be there (at least at these levels) for much longer.
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 08-11-2005, 02:59 PM:
 
On the upper Eastside of Manhattan they are getting $2.87 per gallon for octane 87. In Rhode Island I pay $2.43 for the same gallon.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 08-11-2005, 03:30 PM:
 
As I write this I am on vacation in Northern California for a few days, enjoying a little breather in the town of Danville after attending a conference in San Francisco. Since I don't fly and didn't want to make the trip in my thirsty F-150, I rented a Ford Focus. Thirty MPG on the freeway ain't bad (well, compared to the pickup truck anyway).

When I left San Diego last Saturday, I topped off the Focus at $2.619 a gallon for regular at a neighborhood Arco station. Two-hundred fifty miles later...another Arco station, this time in Buttonwillow (off Interstate 5 in the middle of California's produce department and summertime pizza oven known as the San Joaquin Valley [Smile] ), $2.559/gallon.

Arco's usually one of the least expensive major gasoline brands, but apparently not here in Danville. Try $2.819/gallon for regular, up to $3.019/gallon for super. Other brands of gas are just as steep. [Eek!] [Eek!] [Eek!] Guess I won't be filling up here...
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-11-2005, 03:36 PM:
 
Bobby: very interesting. You could substitute 'America' for 'Britain' in your last post and it would almost all be just as true.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Here's what all the money chasing MBAs don't want people to mention: many millions of Americans are paying their bills with borrowed money and equity cashed out of their homes. [...] People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.
It made the news earlier this year when Britain's total consumer debt busted the £1 trillion mark. Savings have also slumped. The reasons given for this vary. Opponents of the present government point to a big increase on the taxation on personal pensions introduced when it came to power in 1997, while others point to lower stock market returns (especially after the dot com bubble burst in 2000) and higher property prices encouraging people to regard their house as their retirement fund.

But, mortgage lending aside, I just can't figure out why this credit-led spending binge has gone on for so long and shows no sign of slowing. Surely, sooner or later people will reach the limit on their credit cards, or see that an extra fiver a week on their petrol bill is adding up, and decide that it's reality check time? Not yet, it seems.

quote: Bobby Henderson
The insane run up in home prices is largely due to speculators trading property like they were trading baseball cards. Truly, prices in most markets in the United States are hyper-inflated far beyond what the market would actually bear if we were talking about mortgages supported by real income.
This is where the difference comes, I think, although it's true that mortgage lending has gone up. It used to be said that a sensible level of mortgage lending was three times someone's annual income. Well, a very basic one-bedroom apartment in my neighbourhood costs 5-6 times my annual income. Unless there's a crash, there's no way I could ever afford to buy: and if there is a crash, the economy will be so well and truly sodomised that I will probably no longer have a job to pay the mortgage with! But I think that the house price increases here are supported by real money: money which has flowed out of the stock market and other forms of investment over the last 7-9 years and into residential property. The problem is that this shift seriously damaged our manufacturing industry (albeit indirectly) and locked those of my generation, and the one behind me, which don't have the capital to invest in the first place, out of the market.

quote: Bobby Henderson
The pricing structure of our economy has very wrongfully changed to assume that money is real income when it is extremely the reverse.
Agreed totally, and one thing I don't hear talked about is that the era of low interest rates is making that worse. During the last housing boom and bust of the late '80s/early '90s, interest rates were running at the 10-15% mark. So the real value of people's mortgages relative to their income was being eroded year by year. Now that rates are pretty much stable in the 3-5% bracket, they aren't. The average Brit's mortgage payment, especially for those who bought during the recent boom, is likely to be a higher proportion of their real income for a lot longer.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Our whole damned economy is effectively on a credit card. It's going to be ugly when that housing market bubble pops. You're going to see lots of people "upside down" owing a lot more money than their house is actually worth.
That's what happened in the early '90s here, which ushered the term 'negative equity' (mortgage value exceeding market value of property) into the dictionary. The big fear is, of course, of this happening again. The housing market is in a bit of a 'phoney war' at the moment: prices are effectively static, but, worryingly, the number of properties changing hands is plummeting. Because, as yet, unemployment hasn't risen significantly (we avoided a recession, unlike most other European markets, because of a healthy consumer and service sector), so people don't need to move. So if they're not getting what they're asking for their houses, they're just not selling. But if, for whatever reason, these people are forced to sell, then it logically follows that the UK economy will go TU very quickly.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Speculation, rather than market reality, has pushed oil to very wrong, over priced levels.
Especially since it's reported that the supply problem is caused by limited refining capacity, not limited crude availability. If anything I'd have thought that should push the cost of crude down, since there's no point in buying it if you then have to store it for a long time before it can be processed.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-11-2005, 04:03 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
But, mortgage lending aside, I just can't figure out why this credit-led spending binge has gone on for so long and shows no sign of slowing.
The reason is people are spending out all their home equity. Their houses rise in value on paper, but those folks are spending it all in real cash. Speculators keep on pushing housing prices farther and father into the stratosphere and the average American is spending the cash like a junky hooked on heroin. They just can't stop.

As interest rates keep creeping higher and higher that's going to finally put a lid on this skyrocketing housing prices. Those people will have no more equity to spend. And they'll have a ton of bills they have no way to pay.

I would expect to see a spike in bancruptcies, repossessions, estate liquidations and especially divorces.

On the bright side, some people may make out very well even when the housing bubble bursts. But those smart few are going to be the ones who simply rolled all that extra equity into other more stable investments. Or you might have an elderly guy with no heirs who properly set up a reverse mortage to use the gravy for living costs. There's lots of reverse mortgages that are outright scams however.

Anyway, whenver these feared bubbles pop I sure don't want to be one of the folks drowning in debt at that time. I have very little debt to speak of, but that's only because I'm living humbly well within my means.
 
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 08-13-2005, 07:50 PM:
 
$2.45 for regular unleaded both east and west of the Penn-Ohio line.

quote: Leo Enticknap
It used to be said that a sensible level of mortgage lending was three times someone's annual income
I went for a mortgage this past April and that is the general rule the realtor used for me when I first began to look at some properties. In my neck of the woods you can find a solid home in a nice neighborhood with a good school for under $100,000. My mortgage is only $50 more than what I was paying to rent, so we're not seeing the mind-numbing increases that folks in other parts (albeit more wealthier parts) of the nation are seeing. I paid about 130% of my yearly gross income for a ranch-style home approximately 40 - 45 years old. The interest rate on my loan is 5.25%. I believe that what I got for the price paid was well worth it.

quote: Bobby Henderson
People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.
. . . and has been since the early 1990's. When I first started working for pay on a local farm at age 14 my parents required me to put 80% of my net in the bank. This soon built up a small nest egg that actually helped bridge the gap between what my college loans paid out and the actual tuition of the college I attended. Friends and co-workers were very suprised at this. So to were some adults and even an economics teacher at my high school. People somehow believed that by sacrificing myself from the newest fashions or latest CD I wasn't the "normal" kid. Not to be political, but when the Treasury Department sent me my $300 refund after the Bush election, mine went into the bank where it still sits today. I think the two biggest reasons why nobody saves today like in past generations is:
Availability of easy credit.
Relaxed bankruptcy laws.
Or in other words, live for the moment because somebody else can always bail you out.

Gone are the days of individualism . . .
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 08-13-2005, 09:16 PM:
 
4-years ago I looked at a gas station sign $2.35 and thought "oh my God that shit's expensive." [Eek!]

This morning I looked at a sign:

$2.69 Regular
$2.79 Creamier
$2.89 Digital or Turbo, I'm not sure
$3.05 Diesel

And thought, "Oh good, it hasn't gotten over $3 yet." [Smile]

And what's up with Diesel? How did it go from the cheapest fuel to the most expensive? Can you run Jet "A" in your Diesel? It cost less, but maybe that's only to the airlines with contracts and volume discounts.

Do I wish, I had bought the Prius 50 mpg instead of the Malibu 30 mpg ? No, but I do with I had bought the Element 25 mpg. Or how about a Vespa GT 60 mpg? [thumbsup]

What I really wish is that I lived where I didn't need a car and could rent whatever I needed or wanted. My next weekend car rental will cost $75, a year of those rentals would only be $3,900.
 
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 08-13-2005, 11:05 PM:
 
Back in 1996 Clinton supposedly released the Strategic Oil Reserve onto the open market so grandma didn't freeze to death that winter. In hind sight that was all bullshit since his reasoning was to screw Big Oil since the environmentalist plank in the Democrat platform couldn't stand those guys. But who really cared, gas was cheap and the price was stable.

Now Big Oil is striking back, trying to make up for lost revenue. I think at heart this is why fuel is so expensive.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 08-14-2005, 02:51 AM:
 
Saw picts of San Fransisco in the paper. UL hitting at $3.05/gal ...whoa...

quote: Bobby Henderson
"....and the average American is spending the cash like a junky hooked on heroin. They just can't stop."

....like those self destructing little lemmings heading out to sea when jumping over the cliff.

Society is turning into a "supply and demand" society, and automakers are loving every minute of it when a sucker signs a stupid lease contract for a new FORD Super Heavy Duty, CHEV Avalanche, or a DODGE 2500 Power Wagon - let along the SUV market from practically all of these automakers.

Signing a lease contract so you can get the biggest toy that you can get is like flushing the toilet once a month and get a big chunk taken off the ass when the contract expires, especially when you don't sign up for another lease to continue the destructive cycle. This is due to the massive reduction of value of the vehicle after the contract is over with and then you get stuck up the ass with the difference of the book value, unless you resign a new lease contract.

(Course, automakers are seeing the dark clouds due to the reduction of SUV sales due to the fuel prices...people are getting tired of shelling out hundreds of (credit)dollars in fuel and insurance just by driving to the store and back-let alone galavanting on the freeway)

Gadgets of all shapes, colors, types and kinds are actually destroying this society -these are actually making "slaves" out of our selves to where the gadgets control us instead of us controlling the gadgets. When these gadgets control us, our tempers flare, our patience ceases to function (or get pushed back on the back burner), our pride is being withered away, et.al.

-Monte
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 08-14-2005, 05:58 AM:
 
quote: Ian Price
$2.79 Creamier
Creamier? [Confused]

quote: Ian Price
$2.89 Digital or Turbo, I'm not sure

Digital? [Confused] [Confused]
 
Posted by Floyd Justin Newton (Member # 1316) on 08-14-2005, 07:58 AM:
 
Stehan-- EVERYTHING is digital these days.!
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 08-14-2005, 08:53 AM:
 
Manhattan

Exxon
Premium $3.02 Reg. $2.74

Queens

Getty
Preium $2.90 Reg. $2.70

Hess Premium $2.90 Reg.2.62

Brooklyn

Gulf
Premium $355 Reg.3.31

Maybe I should move this to the Joke Forum. [Eek!]
 
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 08-14-2005, 09:47 AM:
 
Gas has hit $2.50.9 here for regular at the indie stations. Used to be a good 5-10 cent difference between the indies and, say, Exxon, or Aamoco/BP. Not any more.

Around here, diesel fuel cost more than premium. WTF? Diesel fuel is crap compared to gasoline!

I feel for folks that have to fill 500 gallon oil tanks with home heating oil this winter.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 08-14-2005, 02:32 PM:
 
A few nights ago the CBS Evening News noted a gas station along the Pacific Coast Highway had broken the $4/gallon barrier with premium available for an astounding $4.09 a gallon. Regular went for a just-as-insane (by California standards) $3.89/gallon at this station, the last gas station for 65 miles called "The Last Gas".

Four bucks a gallon? Highway robbery, indeed! [Smile] [Eek!]
 
Posted by Jon Morgan (Member # 3059) on 08-14-2005, 02:41 PM:
 
2.489 last night on the way home from work.

If I'd gotten a full tank of gas it would have been 40+ dollars.
 
Posted by Floyd Justin Newton (Member # 1316) on 08-14-2005, 05:25 PM:
 
Folks, this is GREED in action [fu] .
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-14-2005, 05:49 PM:
 
Today $2.60+ for regular, $2.80+ for premium.
 
Posted by Kyle McEachern (Member # 2250) on 08-14-2005, 06:59 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I've been swearing for months that if gasoline hit $2.50 per gallon I was going to buy a bicycle and start using that for my 6-mile each way commute.

I may have to make good on that promise soon.

Time to bust out the wallet for the bike, Bobby!

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/14/gas.prices/index.html

quote: CNN.com
(CNN) -- Gas prices surged 20 cents over the past three weeks to an all-time high of $2.50 per gallon of self-serve regular, according to a national survey.

 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-15-2005, 04:07 PM:
 
$2.37 at cheap places, in high income areas and the inner city $2.49 and higher for regular.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-15-2005, 10:29 PM:
 
quote:
Time to bust out the wallet for the bike, Bobby!
Yes, it is just about time. And I have been browsing through some bicycle web sites to familiarize myself with what's good, bad and "good enough."

Here in Lawton, most stations are selling gasoline for $2.45. That's down four cents from the $2.49 I saw Friday. I was leaving town and heading to downtown Oklahoma City for the Oklahoma Sign Association annual convention. I really wished I'd topped off my tank Thursday night. That's because when I pulled into the station one of the clerks was changing the gas price changer sign from $2.39 to $2.49.
[Mad]

Now with gasoline at $2.45, I'm wondering if I should just fill up the tank completely. After all, the price might be $2.59 on Friday. We also have a couple more weeks of August and the Labor Day holiday ahead. That'll give those greedy oil speculators at least 20 cents more of wiggle room before that "summer driving season" is over. Some of the news folks are saying "prices should stabilize" by then. Ah. "Stabilize." That doesn't exactly sound like prices will come down. Add to that the likely scenario later in September of the speculators saying we're going to have a really cold winter and heating oil supplies will be sparse. They're just going to keep jacking up prices until they spark a bona-fide economic recession.

I have been planning a road trip to visit family in Colorado Springs at the end of the month. For 1200 miles of driving round trip, and factoring in more price increases for fuel, I figure I'll spend over $200 on gas alone.

Yes, it is about time to buy a bicycle. A $200 or $300 bike of reasonably decent quality may pay for itself in a fairly short amount of time. And I'll get the exercise benefit.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 08-15-2005, 11:19 PM:
 
Bobby, you could probably fly to Colorado Springs for the same amount if you bought a ticket ahead of time, Southwest always has good deals.
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 08-15-2005, 11:59 PM:
 
There's a Norwegian company called Think that makes electric cars. Ford bought them a few years ago and then tried to kill them off. I don't think they are involved anymore. There were two in Santa Rosa for a while and one of them used to come to my theatre.

They are back in business trying to develop electric cars for urban markets around town. None of there cars are highway legal. They have a new concept for public cars that are left a train stations and public areas for people to borrow as they need them. It's called Think Public.

 -

 -

 -

Ok, they only go 30 MPH, but they sure fit my asthetic as to how a car should look. I'd love to live in a city, not own a car and grab one of these every time I needed to go grocery shopping or down to Ikea.

http://www.think.no/

Price of Unleaded in Norway about $4.50 US per US Gallon.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-16-2005, 07:10 AM:
 
I wouldn't want to be hit by anything bigger that a bicycle on one of those things. It doesn't matter how fast it will go, everybody else is moving a lot faster. With all that glass, ac will be a problem in the southeast and the southwest, its probably adequate for Norway though.

A public car? Who is paying for it?? Would that be a rental or what would seem to be a free ride that is being paid for by somebody else, likely the taxpayers?

How much does heat and AC cut into the already limited range and performance.

The replacement cost of the batteries will probably cause the owner to go into shock.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 08-16-2005, 03:21 PM:
 
quote: Floyd Justin Newton
Folks, this is GREED in action
Be interested to hear who you think the greedy are...?

Heres a interesting graphic from CNN

 -

Seems like we are the current limit of the supply side, and thus prices likely to keep rising...
 
Posted by Joseph Pandolfi (Member # 223) on 08-16-2005, 04:24 PM:
 
I remember you can get 3 gallons for a dollar. Now it's 3 dollars for a gallon. I filled by 67 VW bug for under 3 dollars.
 
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 08-16-2005, 11:23 PM:
 
I think the idea of a public car is a good one, provided some kinks can be worked out.

It'd have to be paid for by a combination of government (tax) and private (invested) money. It'd probably have to be run by a non-profit organization and it'd be ESSENTIAL that the organization's mission is stated so that ALL profits above operating expenses and salaries be plowed back into the operation. (Back into its endowment?)

It could only be an organization such as this which can afford to buy dozens of these cars, deploy, and maintian them.

I can't imagine they'd be useful anywhere but central cities and shopping districts. Though they can only go 30 MPH there needs to be a repair crew in range of these things at all times. If one gets stuck, breaks down or runs out of gas/batteries nobody wants to tow these things miles and miles back to the central station. Vehicle safety in the central city, although important, isn't as critical as on the freeways. (They'd be prohibited on freeways anyhow... Minimum speed limits.)

As for deployment, think of them as something that's half way between a subway system and a self-driven taxi. They are deployed around subway stations and parking garages. The user goes into the special lot, picks up a key from the attendant, checks out the car and drives off. You don't have to wait for the next train to come. You don't have to stand around on piss-scented underground platforms. You don't have to put up with surly cab drivers whose names you can't pronnounce and who speak three words of English.

I'd imagine payment would be by a ticket or a pass system. Users could buy a one-time ticket or a pass for the whole day/month. Once the driver is credentialed and payed up it's just a matter of checking in at the depot and picking up the keys.

Sure, there are a lot of pain in the ass issues to work out but the benefits, potentially, could be huge. A fleet of vehicles is more efficient than privately owned vehicles. (Most cars sit idle for the majority of the time, waiting for their owners to drive them.) Fleets can have the most efficient vehicles for the abiltiy of engineers to design and produce them.

Look at it this way: Less than 10% of the energy gained from burning gasoline goes to actually propelling the car. If the fuel efficiency of a car can be improved by only 1%, that's like putting 10% of your fuel back into the gas tank. It is in the fleet owner's best interest to have the most fuel efficient vehicles possible. (Electricity IS fuel. It's just burned at the power plant, miles and miles away.)

Also think of this: For every gallon of gas you refine you need about two gallons of crude oil. (The average 42 US gal. barrel of crude oil yeilds about 20 gallons of gas... 48%) For every gallon of gas you save, you DON'T have to import TWO gallons of oil.

So, taken to its logical conclusion, if there was a way to magically increase the average fuel mileage of every car in America by 1% we would suddenly need to import 10-20% LESS oil than we do right now! Doing that would drop prices enough that the average consumer wouldn't have to worry about whether he should buy food or fill up the tank so he can drive to work. And we could absorb the effect of those few jizm-wads who insist on driving gas hogs just because they can afford to.

Having more fleet vehicles is a good start on achieving such a goal. The Think electric car concept, I believe is a good way to increase the number of fleet vehicles in use.
 
Posted by Robert Burtcher (Member # 3227) on 08-17-2005, 05:01 AM:
 
The main problem that is causing gasoline prices to skyrocket in the US actually has to do with our refining capacity. No new refineries have been built since the 1970s due to strict EPA regulations. While new technology and processes have increased production per capita, older refining facilities have been shut down due to age or destruction by fire, etc. The net result is that while our usage of petroleum fuels has increased over the past 30 years, our total refining capacity has stayed the same. This leads to a VERY tight supply and demand situation.

As well, the worldwide demand for petroleum fuels has increased, especially in developing nations. More countries are competing for the same oil, and once again, this leads to a VERY tight supply and demand situation.

We do still have it lucky here in the US... Gasoline is a lot more expensive per US Gallon in amost every other country.

And for the record:
Edmond, Oklahoma, USA: $2.479/g
 
Posted by Paul Konen (Member # 41) on 08-17-2005, 11:23 AM:
 
North Dallas Area:
2.69 for regular unleaded (87)
2.79
2.89 for Premium
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 08-17-2005, 02:55 PM:
 
There is already a company in San Francisco called Car Share. A friend of mine works for them. The company owns the cars and they are distributed throughout the city. They call the parking lots where they store the cars "Pods". They are mostly public lots downtown and near Bart.

You become a member and they the charge is $4 per hour and $.44 per mile. One day I worked it out, if you need a car for 4-hours per week and perhaps 50-miles, it would be cheaper than owning. If you needed a car 8-hours per week and needed to drive 100-miles, it would be cheaper to own something cheap.

They use VW Beetles and Honda Civics. The cost include gas, maintenance and comprehensive
 
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 08-17-2005, 05:56 PM:
 
quote: Robert Burtcher
The main problem that is causing gasoline prices to skyrocket in the US actually has to do with our refining capacity.
I'm sorry Robert, but I must disagree. On the surface that is a compelling arguement and deserves some merit, however, prices would still rise even if our refining capabilities were up to speed with usage. True, things must be improved, and I'm all for building new refineries, yet Big Oil will continue to sock it to the public by claiming construction costs or infrastructure development as in the case of ANWR. The fact is we are stoaking a fire that is about to burn out of control, but there is nothing we can do to contain things.
 
Posted by Matt Hollis (Member # 2954) on 08-17-2005, 06:23 PM:
 
$2.55 here in northeast Arkansas. I bought super for $2.10 the other day in Missouri, but it was a 10% ethanol blend.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 08-19-2005, 12:16 PM:
 
Diesel: $2.74 the other day at the Pilot in Milford, CT.
$2.67, at the Pilot in Sturbridge, MA
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 08-19-2005, 12:31 PM:
 
Regular: $2.52 - 2.78
Diesel: $2.75 - 2.89

We've been setting new highs every day here the last couple of weeks. One station in town has just started pumping that E85 ethanol-gas blend for a $1.88.
 
Posted by Roger Manning Jr (Member # 1560) on 08-19-2005, 01:32 PM:
 
Regular: $2.95 - $3.02
Diesel: $3.09
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 08-19-2005, 06:01 PM:
 
quote: Bob Maar
Brooklyn..Gulf Premium $355
JEEZ! This is insane.
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 08-19-2005, 06:22 PM:
 
There is also Zipcar in Boston and a few other cities. The concept is the same as what Ian describes. You pay a flat rate per year for "membership," which gives you the ability to rent cars by the hour. They have a variety of different types of cars and rates are reasonable. I'm not a customer, but have spoken to several, all of whom are happy with the service. It's a good option for those who live and work downtown, but need occasional use of a car without having to worry about payments, maintenance, and insurance.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-20-2005, 05:07 AM:
 
I'm sure that a scheme like that would be very popular in a number of British cities, where the cost of running a car is much greater than in suburbs or rural areas. In some parts of London, renting a parking space or garage can easily set you back four figures a year, and then there's the £8 'congestion charge' you have to pay to drive in the city centre during weekdays. The last time I lived in London (over a decade ago now, admittedly), I commuted into town by train and my car did nothing for about 6 days a week. I'm sure that the same is true of most private cars parked in the inner city area.

I've got one friend in York who doesn't own a car but hires one for occasional weekends away and so on. The only problem she finds is that the rental companies demand extra insurance payments to take account of the fact that she doesn't drive regularly. I guess this raises the safety issue of people driving around crowded roads in busy traffic who have not been behind the wheel for months beforehand. But a membership based scheme like Zipcar would be able to take account of individual circumstances a bit more, for example by setting the insurance component of the rental fee according to how many miles you've driven in the previous 12-month period.
 
Posted by Steve Scott (Member # 630) on 08-20-2005, 10:17 AM:
 
I've begun to take the light-rail to work, and walk the rest of the distance. I figured that I was spending, roughly eight dollars per day in gas & parking, versus the $3.50 it takes to commute round trip. I've been told that I can get a discount on my state-mandated insurance coverage, as my car is now for leisure driving only [thumbsup]

For anyone travelling in or to Minneapolis, the Hiawatha light rail line is very cheap, convenient, and (based on the times of day I travel) pleasant.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-20-2005, 04:26 PM:
 
Just got back to SoCal from Texas. For 87 octane, I paid between $2.40 and $2.63 a gallon in all places EXCEPT in Needles, CA where it was $3.09/gal.

...AND! I didn't even get kissed while they f*ucked me! [Mad]
 
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-20-2005, 05:29 PM:
 
I was in Chicago this week and paid $2.979 at Citgo. Other stations were generally a cent or two higher.
 
Posted by William Leland III (Member # 1400) on 08-21-2005, 12:01 AM:
 
$2.59 for plus in charleston,s.c
 
Posted by Michael Coate (Member # 757) on 08-23-2005, 09:30 AM:
 
I'm in Alamogordo, New Mexico staying with some relatives. Price for gas at the moment is between $2.50 and 2.70.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-30-2005, 03:52 PM:
 
Alamogordo? That's only 100 miles from my home town (Artesia). Back to topic...

Sunday evening, about 12 hours ahead of the Hurricane Katrina landfall, I filled up my pickup here in Lawton for $2.49 per gallon.

This morning (just two days later), it was at $2.55 per gallon.

As of noon time, the same station was selling 87 octane "regular" for $2.79 per gallon.

[Mad] [Mad] [Mad]

That pretty well cinches it. I'm getting a bicycle. It's only 4.5 miles from my house to my work. I'll get some exercise and save some money as well.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-30-2005, 08:45 PM:
 
Noted in Eugene on my bike ride to work this morning: $2.78 for regular, $2.98 for premium.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-30-2005, 09:51 PM:
 
Some of the finance industry news folks are saying by the end of the week every service station in the country will be selling gasoline for no less than $3.00 per gallon.

I'm seriously considering cancelling my vacation. A 1200 mile road trip (plus the back and forth driving I'll do for that week in thee 'Springs) may cost me $225 to $250 in fuel alone.
 
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 08-30-2005, 10:32 PM:
 
They used to give you things at the gas station. One gas company gave you a sticker that looked like a tiger tail was sticking out of your gas tank. Another had a blow-up dinosaur.

Now they just take your money. I have a feeling we aint seen nothing yet.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 08-31-2005, 02:29 AM:
 
It had to happen! Premium gas is now a little over $3.00 a gallon at most gas stations here in Honolulu. It is much higher on the neighbor islands. With the state;s new cap on fuel price law, there is a possibility gas could soar to about $3.25 a gallon. Auwe!

-Claude
 
Posted by Peter Kerchinsky (Member # 1098) on 08-31-2005, 04:56 AM:
 
Regular unleaded in Seattle $2.85 and rising. Time to by a scooter.
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 08-31-2005, 06:20 AM:
 
New York City as of this morning on the upper Eastside area

Regular $3.25

Super 89 Oct. $3.54

Hightest 93 Oct. $3.74
 
Posted by Mark Hajducki (Member # 1732) on 08-31-2005, 06:21 AM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
I'm sure that a scheme like that would be very popular in a number of British cities, where the cost of running a car is much greater than in suburbs or rural areas.
There is already a scheme like this in some British cities.

The cost is worked out on an hourly rate (plus a subscription fee) so is less competative for longer hires.

Information at http://www.smartmoves.co.uk/
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 08-31-2005, 07:29 AM:
 
On the way to work this morning, I spotted prices ranging from $2.75 to $3.09 [Eek!]

This is for self-serve regular-grade unleaded.
 
Posted by Jeff Lacey (Member # 3217) on 08-31-2005, 11:52 AM:
 
$3.56 for 92 in the Detroit Area... I have to put the good stuff in my car, so this is really starting to suck! Many stations are even running out of gas at all grades. A station near me is selling the stuff for $3.92/gallon

[ 08-31-2005, 01:02 PM: Message edited by: Jeff Lacey ]
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-31-2005, 12:17 PM:
 
$2.83 for regular, $3.03 for premium this morning.
 
Posted by Joshua Waaland (Member # 287) on 08-31-2005, 01:23 PM:
 
My wife just called me and said our local neighborhood gas stations are charging over $3.00 now for 89 octane. We are in the southeastern Cleveland suburbs. [puke]
 
Posted by Jeremy Fuentes (Member # 2135) on 08-31-2005, 01:26 PM:
 
Well at least we have a home to park our vehicles at. Not like the millions affected directly by the storm.
 
Posted by David L Parlier (Member # 1944) on 08-31-2005, 01:46 PM:
 
It has gone up twice today with regular unleaded now at $3.20 this afternoon. I few local gas stations are already out of the cheap stuff and saying that they are just waiting for fuel shipments.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 08-31-2005, 02:19 PM:
 
96.5p a litre this evening at a village petrol station in Yorkshire, just 6 miles from the A1. At this rate we'll be looking at a pound a litre before too long.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 08-31-2005, 02:23 PM:
 
Big landmark in NZ today - diesel passes the unheard of price of a (NZD) dollar a litre, doubled in less than two years.
 
Posted by Adam Fraser (Member # 1074) on 08-31-2005, 04:39 PM:
 
3.48 for regular in Lake City and Cadillac MI at some stations, 3.20 at some others.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 08-31-2005, 04:50 PM:
 
$2.68 here for regular. It was $2.54 yesterday.
 
Posted by Jeremy Jorgenson (Member # 2989) on 08-31-2005, 05:02 PM:
 
yesterday in Chicago, I saw it for $3.59 (87 octane), $3.69 (89), & $3.79 (premium - not sure of the octane). This was not downtown / Loop area ... It's generally higher there.
 
Posted by Rick Raskin (Member # 1561) on 08-31-2005, 06:06 PM:
 
87 Octane yesterday $2.55. Today $3.07. Same station!
 
Posted by Kelly Skaggs (Member # 1780) on 08-31-2005, 06:47 PM:
 
On my way to work this morning $2.50 a gal. 9 hrs. later on the way home the same station $3.10. [Eek!]
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 08-31-2005, 08:33 PM:
 
Tonight, the CBS Evening News had a pic of an Atlanta area gas station showing over $6.00/gal for premium. I dunno, seemed like a stunt to me.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 08-31-2005, 08:35 PM:
 
I also saw the CBS footage Paul mentioned of the BP/Amoco station in southern Atlanta charging $5.899 to 6.099 a gallon for regular and premium, respectively. [Eek!] [Eek!] [Eek!]

The Arco station (for the record, another BP brand) closest to me, which sold regular for $2.699/gallon just last week (down from $2.719 the week earlier) now wants $2.879 as of this morning and I wouldn't be surprised if I spotted at least $2.959 tomorrow morning.

So-o-o glad I finally broke down and bought a 26-35 mpg Ford Focus last weekend to replace my 13 mpg F-150, before all heck broke loose! [Cool]
 
Posted by Paul Konen (Member # 41) on 08-31-2005, 08:38 PM:
 
And you know that most of those stations didn't receive a tanker that day. [Frown] [Mad]
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 08-31-2005, 08:43 PM:
 
It's unfortunate that even though President Bush has authorized the release of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserves, there's no place to refine the oil with fifteen or so Gulf Coast refineries shut down due to the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Alas, no fuel to fill the tankers. [Frown]
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 08-31-2005, 08:43 PM:
 
If you know you're gonna pay more for the next load, you raise your price now to cover it. Gas stations have always operated that way. [Frown] [Shrug]
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 08-31-2005, 10:00 PM:
 
I filled up the Accord yesterday morning at Sam's. $2.389.

The Shell behind my office went up .57 since yetserday afternoon alone. Gas is between 2.74 and 3.29 for 87 octane around here.
It's a sad fact that, like others have stated, once the gas prices rise to over 3.00, we'll likely NEVER see the day where you can get gas for under $2.509 again... I'm going to go broke filling my tank for work.. or I'm goig to have to get a fuel allowance increase...
 
Posted by Robert Burtcher (Member # 3227) on 09-01-2005, 01:08 AM:
 
On 8/30, gas prices here in Oklahoma City jumped an average of 50c in a matter of a few hours. In the morning, the gasoline prices were right about $2.479 at most stations near my house. By 3pm, every gas station in Edmond was selling regular unleaded (87 octane) at no less than $2.979.

If gas prices don't drop by the end of October, I'm going to have to cancel my road trip to Chicago just before Thanksgiving... [thumbsdown]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-01-2005, 02:21 AM:
 
The radio this morning carried an interview with a Delta Airlines executive, who said that if pipelines linking the Gulf Coast refineries with the north-east aren't back online within 3-5 days, major airports risk running out of fuel supplies. He said that Washington/Dulles, Atlanta and Memphis were at the greatest risk. With the aviation industry in its current state, that's all it needs, I guess.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 09-01-2005, 04:48 AM:
 
On the way to get lunch today I see that fuel is $1.02 a litre. I decide to stop for fuel on the way back so I don't have to cross the street twice.

I drive one block further to Subway. I get a sub and get bitched at for wanting more onions than they're supposed to give (never mind that I only got three toppings and not all 10 ... why can't I have 7x the number of onions -- I really only want 2x or 3x anyway). This takes nearly 15 minutes because they're almost as slow as Tim Hortons.

I drive the one block back to the gas station. Fuel is now $1.25 a litre, nearly a 23% increase. An 80% increase since the beginning of July.

That was one expensive sub (an extra $18.40).

quote: Jon Miller
It's unfortunate that even though President Bush has authorized the release of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserves, there's no place to refine the oil with fifteen or so Gulf Coast refineries shut down due to the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Alas, no fuel to fill the tankers.
Even if it could be refined it won't make fuel any less expensive since nobody expects they'll be able to "repay" that oil reserve with less expensive oil in the future.
 
Posted by Paul Cassidy (Member # 951) on 09-01-2005, 05:29 AM:
 
Well Petrol has passed $1.50 here in Auckland , currently $1.53
sorry thats per Litre
 
Posted by Jennifer Pan (Member # 2035) on 09-01-2005, 09:32 AM:
 
$2.58 for regular... but that's WAY across town and into the next, next town.

Pretty much everything around my area is around $2.70 for regular.

I heard people were thinking about blowing up gas stations instead of boycotting them.
 
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 09-01-2005, 10:27 AM:
 
I see a recession on the horizon unless these prices can get under control. If there is going to be a possible shortage of gas then we need to start thinking about designating fill up days. I know it's not the greatest thing and causes long lines at the pump but what can you do. I remember the odd and even days when your last plate number decided when you could fill your tank.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-01-2005, 11:27 AM:
 
Yep, and violence. I got 170 gallons of diesel in Massachusetts yesterday... the bill was almost $500! I see where unleaded just hit $3.09 in Philly.

As I predicted, they went wild when they broke $2/gal. Now they've quickly broken $3, so they'll probably figure they can get by with $4 next week...
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 09-01-2005, 01:05 PM:
 
quote: David Stambaugh
If you know you're gonna pay more for the next load, you raise your price now to cover it. Gas stations have always operated that way.
Not just gas...all retail operates that way.

Now $2.84 here, up 20 cents from yesterday. "Super" just went over $3, to $3.04. This is an Exxon station.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-01-2005, 01:33 PM:
 
Yep, back to 1973 when the first embargo hit and prices begin to shoot upwards - from 31 cents to 49 cents/gallon (who heard of UNL then...)

Speed limits started to tumble to a flat 55mph for all of the roads.

Yep, the beginning of the even/odd days of fillups with stations shutting down around 5pm.

...that was a baddie. Luckilly, here in Idaho, we didn't suffer too badly only with the speed limit change.

I bought my first Toyota (a Corolla) in 1976 - had enough of blowing fuel out the tailpipe. Graduated up from 17mpg to 36mpg

...then, the second one hit in 1979 and solidified the demand of the economy car - espeically from Japan and it finally woke up Detroit in making a fuel efficent car.

It looks like we might be going back to that era of 30 yrs ago...

Now, with the damage from Katrina's ire, talk about airports possibly having troubles with receiving fuel. Time to bring back the train services.

..glad I have a small motorbike to run to work on so I can keep the cars off the road.
 
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 09-01-2005, 02:55 PM:
 
We're up over $3.00 here in the Philly suburb of Exton.

quote: Darryl Spicer
I remember the odd and even days when your last plate number decided when you could fill your tank.
So do I, but what if your plate ends in a "J" like mine does?

Anyway, time to cut ALL gasoline taxes, state and federal. Shame we didn't set up the drilling and refineries in Anwar. [Frown]
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-01-2005, 04:46 PM:
 
A while back, when all this started, they were saying on the news that gas is still relatively cheap - and compared it to how expensive a gallon of milk was, as well as other items.

I say, when people start using 20 gallons of milk a week (or whatever the item), then we can make that comparision. Right now, we're getting screwed.
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 09-01-2005, 04:54 PM:
 
Short exerpt from CNN website

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush warned Thursday against price-gouging of gasoline in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and said looters should be treated with zero tolerance.

"I think there ought to be zero tolerance of people breaking the law during an emergency such as this, whether it be looting, or price-gouging at the gasoline pump or taking advantage of charitable giving, or insurance fraud," Bush said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

Gasoline sellers have been fast to raise prices in the wake of the storm. Prices have risen above $3 a gallon and in some places are higher because of a sudden drop in oil supplies.

Bush said Americans should conserve more gasoline in response to the crisis and said he expected Saudi Arabia to do "everything they can" to provide more oil. He said eight refineries are down in the Gulf and "it's going to take a while" to get them going again.

"I would hope Americans conserve if given a choice," he said.


Theres the message.

As has already been noted, providing SPR oil isn't going to be much help (ie its 9 parts PR), and Saudi oil, even if they can produce it (which they've already been promising for months but its yet to appear) is sour grade and thus also not terribly useful for getting gas into American cars, due to existing lack of refining capacity for sour crude.

Katrina has done quite some damage to Gulf of Mexico ops, theres a few platforms "missing", most refining is offline, and theres still a load of unknowns such as how much undersea infrastructure is trashed. And there are expected to be impacts on natural gas (and thus electricity), which haven't started to filter through yet.

Bad times with probably more bad times ahead.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 09-01-2005, 08:49 PM:
 
A followup to the story of that BP station in Atlanta, Georgia selling six-buck-a-gallon gas...

CBS News report.

It was a stunt...according to the interview, the station's manager priced the fuel so steep to discourage people from filling up in order to protect his supply. He could have closed his station, but did not want to shut out anyone desperately needing fuel and willing to pay his extortion-level rate.

The same report also highlighted one station raising prices three times in a day, which is illegal.

[puke]
 
Posted by Adam Heath (Member # 2910) on 09-01-2005, 08:59 PM:
 
I just paid 3.19 per gallon in Moline Illinois. It's almost 20 cents cheaper on the other side of the Mississippi (where I was headed to pick up film), but I was too low already to risk crossing the bridge [Mad] What can you do. On days I don't have to do the deposit or pick up film I might just start riding my bike to work.
 
Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 09-01-2005, 11:22 PM:
 
Gasis up appx .25 in California - hovering between 2.89 and 3.09 depending on the station. Its ironic that California is now cheaper than a lot of the nation - but - none of the west coast relied on any of the distribution channels in the east..
 
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 09-01-2005, 11:39 PM:
 
My advice, every day you take out the car, fill it up again on your way home. Supplies will get very short very soon, as our usage is matched by our output. With our output down, our supplies will get seemingly streched. Prices will keep going up for a while, and most people just aren't going to conserve, mostly for the same reason they didn't leave new orleans when they were warned to.... "it isn't going to happen to me".

I have a full tank of gas, I am using my car sparingly, and even if I only put in a gallon a day, it keeps it full. I am taking the cautious approach, just in case.

Or maybe I am just paranoid, or crazy... could be possible.

Ciao
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-02-2005, 04:47 AM:
 
quote:
I got 170 gallons of diesel in Massachusetts yesterday... the bill was almost $500!
So Tim, are you seeing a domino effect for you drivers hauling commodies in having to charge more to the sellers to where they'll have to raise prices to compensate them, then wages will have to increase to compensate the actual customer, then the customers are ready to leap over the cliff like those lemmings do due to a sudden madness attack?

Also, why has diesel suddenly become the most expensive fuel, to where many moons ago it was the cheapest - why GM went apeshit crazy in converting 350CID engines to run diesel on a quick design (and not changing the cam drive chain to handle the extreme cylinder pressure, thus busting cams like toothpicks) in the early 80's?

-thx ... Monte
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 09-02-2005, 07:50 AM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
Also, why has diesel suddenly become the most expensive fuel, to where many moons ago it was the cheapest
I'm guessing it's because gasoline is becoming more valuable so the refineries are producing more gasoline per barrel of oil at the expense of diesel thus lowering the supply of diesel (and increasing the price).
 
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 09-03-2005, 03:07 PM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
converting 350CID engines to run diesel on a quick design (and not changing the cam drive chain to handle the extreme cylinder pressure, thus busting cams like toothpicks) in the early 80's?
Ah, my youth revisited.....
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 09-04-2005, 04:17 AM:
 
quote:
Is it really $1.60 a litre in Hamilton? I may fill up a few drums and open up a bootleg fillin' station!
Whaddya know Dave, I paid just that for premium in Midland last night. $115 to fill my car... yippee! I think I'll go back to driving my SUV (just for Randy! [Big Grin] ) which gets better gas millage and can currently be filled for $75.

Anyway... 20 people showed up at the drive-in on bicycles tonight, and we're probably a good 8km from most houses in town.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-04-2005, 06:23 AM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
I'm guessing it's because gasoline is becoming more valuable so the refineries are producing more gasoline per barrel of oil at the expense of diesel thus lowering the supply of diesel (and increasing the price).
This is supposed to be behind fears of a short-term aviation fuel shortage, too: basically, refineries can expect to sell gasoline for roughly twice as much as jet fuel, so they're concentrating production on gasoline. If a jet fuel shortage does actually happen, then presumably the law of supply and demand will sort out the imbalance.
 
Posted by Kelly Skaggs (Member # 1780) on 09-04-2005, 12:13 PM:
 
Dave said
quote: Dave Williams
Or maybe I am just paranoid, or crazy... could be possible.
I guess I am paranoid also, I refill about every other day. I would also rather just put in 10-15 bucks in a few times a week instead of 50-60 bucks in at a time. That just seems not quite as much to me, for some strange reason.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 09-04-2005, 07:28 PM:
 
Auto gas in Louisville: 3.29
100LL aviation fuel in Louisville: 2.89
100LL aviation fuel in Florida: 4.89 Louis
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-05-2005, 03:09 AM:
 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
100LL aviation fuel in Louisville: 2.89
100LL aviation fuel in Florida: 4.89 Louis

(I'll help the newbies on this one. LL=Low Lead 100 octane)

Quite a jump for avfuel from one state to another.

My father, who has his own airplane, fills up on 100LL for about $3.55/gal here in Idaho. I remember when 100 used to be close to 2 bucks a gallon when regular fuel was hitting a buck and a quarter per gallon.

-Monte
 
Posted by Mary Cosgrove (Member # 2095) on 09-05-2005, 03:38 AM:
 
I more or less just keep an eye on diesel prices cause that's what I drive. A week ago diesel was at 2.45 the cheapest I saw and currently the cheapest I have seen is 2.75. Not bad considering it actually had the smallest price jump compared to regular gas which jumped on average .50. It went from being the same price as mid to high end gas to being less then the low end gas.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 09-05-2005, 04:48 AM:
 
$4.89, ouch! It might get expensive soon to fill up my lawn mower. Oh wait, it only takes 8 litres... I guess I won't have no settle for that unleaded stuff anytime soon. [Smile]
 
Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 09-05-2005, 10:15 AM:
 
I just put in seven gallons last night. I got busy and didnt hit the tank for a few days. I use premium, so I spent, 3.07 per gallon. Twenty one dollars used to fill up my sixteen gallon tang. Now it wont even do it half way. We aren't even at the peak yet.

I agree that filling up more frequently takes out the sting of the sticker shock. I will fill up tomorrow just before work too. Three times a week will keep the sticker price at about ten bucks, so it is less of an emotional shock.

Ciao
 
Posted by Paul Konen (Member # 41) on 09-05-2005, 10:32 AM:
 
I thought the refinery process yielded all different types of gas, oil in a certain percentage?
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-05-2005, 11:51 AM:
 
Regular running $2.65 to $3.19 per/gal here this week.
Premium running $3.05 to $3.39.
Diesel running $2.98 to $3.29.

100LL self-serve $3.43.
100LL full-serve $3.63 to $4.75.
Jet A full-serve $4.50 to $5.27.

Yeah, the catalytic cracking process does produce all of the major petroleum products as they distill out at different tempertures. But then you have all the different grades and regional blends for gasoline which have to be stored and transported separately. Which costs more. Same goes for jet fuel and avgas.

Because of the relatively small amount of avgas demanded, the refiners have been eliminating grades wherever they can. Hence these days it's almost impossible to find 80/87 (red) or 100 octane (green) anymore. The only avgas generally available now is 100LL (blue), and for the kerosene burners, Jet A. People running older engines just have to put up with increased plug fouling and shorter valve life until they can overhaul and install the various retrofit kits. Also, many new engine installations have been STC'd by the FAA to run on auto gas (mogas). The end result is the remaining grades of avgas are expensive and subject to spot shortages.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 09-05-2005, 12:31 PM:
 
Because of the inverted reality of 100LL being cheaper than mogas...some auto people are running 50/50 with 100LL. Louis
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 09-05-2005, 03:48 PM:
 
The psychological aspects aside for filling up ones gas tank...it really is like the stock market...if you think gas is going to go back down as the summer travel comes to an end and as refineries go back on line, then you should hold off on filling up until you used to (for me, 1/4 tank).

If you think gas will continue to go up in the next couple of weeks, you should buy early an often to always get it at the cheapest rates.

If gas prices hold steady...it doesn't matter since your cost for gas in your car will be the same at the end of the month regardless of your frequency of filling up.
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 09-06-2005, 10:44 AM:
 
$3.50 in Telluride Colorado.
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 09-06-2005, 12:54 PM:
 
As of Friday in Atlantic City at this one station Prem. was going for $3.79 a gallon, Along the highway Prem. was going for $3.33. Back in Manhattan, yesterday at this station near Tribeca, prem. was going for $3.77 a gallon.
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 09-06-2005, 03:08 PM:
 
They now have a new trick in New York City. On the local news last night several gas stations are charging 4.30 for credit card purchases and 3.80 for cash.

Stay tuned. [Mad]
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 09-13-2005, 09:36 AM:
 
If you're going to ship it's going to cost you more too. UPS fuel surcharge rate as of Sept. 5th.

Ground 3.00%
Air & International 9.50%
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 09-13-2005, 10:53 AM:
 
Currently, gas here is approx $2.80 - $2.99 for regular. Since I deliver pizza, I go to Wal-Mart and put gas money on a shopping card and use Wal-Mart's pumps for .03c a gallon off.

BTW, I no longer have the TA, it was repossesed. I am currently in a 2000 Dodge Intrepid ES (Luxury Model), with leather, and it is my first car with A/C. I get about 17-19 MPG instead of the 8-10MPG with the TA
 
Posted by Pete Naples (Member # 761) on 09-13-2005, 11:28 AM:
 
It's hit the fan here this morning, with diesel at about £1 a litre.

People are organising demonstrations outisde refineries, the media irresponibly reported this as 'blockades', which resulted in panic buying at the pumps, now there's hardly a drop of fuel to be found in Scotland.

Fortunately I've a full tank in the works car, and am away by air travel all week anyway, SWMBO has 2/3 of a tank and isn't using her car this week, and I've 1/4 of a tank of petrol and a full tank of LPG in the Range Rover.
 
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 09-13-2005, 11:35 AM:
 
How, praytell, did you get a 2000 Dodge Intrepid if you couldn't afford the payments on the Trans Am?
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 09-13-2005, 01:14 PM:
 
I have it free and clear. Not a penny paid for it. I was fortunate enough to inherit it from a close family member that passed away recently. Just finished waxing it, looks really nice [Smile] [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Robert Stawiarski (Member # 1842) on 09-14-2005, 04:22 AM:
 
Citibank and Chase both have credit cards with a 5% rebate on gas, supermarkets (non-warehouse clubs), and drug stores. 1% back on everything else. The cards are the "Citi Dividend Platinum Select" and "Chase Cash Plus." They usually have a promotion for $50-$100 in bonus points for signing up... They are untiered cards i.e. 5% back right away, without having to reach certain spending levels like many rewards cards require. There is no annual fee, and the 5% rebate is not part of a intro promotion -- it is a permanent benefit of the card. Most of the various 'deals forums' constantly rank these cards as some of the best.

Also, these are completely separate companies and I have no financial incentive for posting this, just figured some of you might be interested since this is the best rewards card I have come across. I go through roughly two tanks per week of premium (required for my car [Eek!] ), so any extra savings is worth it. Most gas companies also have rewards cards for 5% back or so on their own brand, but then you are restricted to buying from them.

The only catch with this card is that the rewards are limited to $300 per year, which is $6000 in charges if you only use it at gas stations, supermarkets, and drug stores. I just use it to buy gas and go to the grocery store, and use my GM Card for 5% back towards a new GM car on everything else.

Although, nothing will ever beat the $2500 cash I received for transferring my $5k in bonus GM Card points to someone. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 09-14-2005, 05:13 AM:
 
..but still, the interest rates will still bite you where it hurts, especially if you default on one payment...

Banks gotcha coming and going with the "plastic.." - a wild, vicious circle that has no end..

..two tanks a week...that some serious spending...like buying another house at that rate...yeouch!

-Monte
 
Posted by Robert Stawiarski (Member # 1842) on 09-14-2005, 05:55 AM:
 
Yeah, late payments will definitely skyrocket interest rates. However, if you are going to spend the money anyway and pay off the balance each month, rewards cards are the way to go.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-14-2005, 07:25 PM:
 
My wallet took a bit of punishment from a recent week-long stay in Colorado visiting family. I drove up on Labor Day weekend. I filled up in Lawton with 87 octane gas for $2.79 per gallon. Topped off the tank of my pickup (about 11 gallons worth) in Dumas, TX for $2.89 per gallon. Made it to the 'Springs area with plenty of gas to spare. But my jaw fell agape at the signs in Trinidad, CO selling gas for $3.19 per gallon -and that's for 85 octane methanol.

When driving into Colorado Springs, at about 2:30am, there was something of a small riot happening at a 7-Eleven along US-24. Thanks to restrictive sign ordinances, most gas price changers in that area are low to the ground well within arms reach. It seemed someone decided to remove and replace some digits to make it appear like regular unleaded cost only 99 cents a gallon. Cars were backed up all over the place. I was lucky to get around it. Good thing too. Much longer behind the wheel and I would have fallen asleep.

On the way back, gas had fallen about a dime. I topped off the tank with that 85 octance stuff for $2.88 per gallon. I saw the same prices almost all the way back to Lawton. Here, gas was down to $2.79 per gallon -where the price remains today.

But I did pick up something on the trip. I paid a visit to an REI store in Colorado Springs and picked up a pretty nice Novara Ponderosa FS bicycle on sale. It's the coolest bicycle I've ever owned. I'm now using the bike to get some exercise and to commute back and forth to work. I haven't had to drive my truck all week. That's a nice little FU to the oil companies and oil futures speculators.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-15-2005, 06:00 PM:
 
Inventor denies dead cat fuel story

quote:
BERLIN, Germany (Reuters) -- A German inventor said he has developed a method to produce crude oil products from waste that he believes can be an answer to the soaring costs of fuel, but denied a German newspaper story implying he also used dead cats.

Christian Koch, an inventor and patent holder of the "KDV 500" that he said produces high quality fuel, said he can transform waste products such as paper, rubbish and plastic materials into fuel.

But Koch, 55, said there was no truth to stories published in Bild newspaper on Tuesday and Wednesday that suggested he used dead cats as part of the mix for his organic diesel fuel.

"I use paper, plastics, textiles and rubbish," Koch told Reuters.

"It's an alternative fuel that is friendly for the environment. But it's complete nonsense to suggest dead cats. I've never used cats and would never think of that. At most the odd toad may have jumped in."

Bild on Tuesday wrote a headline: "German inventor can turn cats into fuel -- for a tank he needs 20 cats." The paper on Wednesday followed up with a story entitled: "Can you really make fuel out of cats?"

A spokesman for Bild told Reuters the story was meant to show that cat remains could "in theory" be used to make fuel with Koch's patented method.

The author of the story said Koch had never told him directly that he had used dead cats as the story implied.

The Web site of Koch's firm, "Alphakat GmbH", says his patented "KDV 500" machine can produce what he calls the "bio-diesel" fuel at about 23 euro cents (30 cents) a liter, which is about one-fifth the price at petrol stations now.

"I drive my normal diesel-powered car with this mixture," Koch is quoted saying in Bild, next to a large picture of a kitten. "I have gone 170,000 km (106,000 miles) without a problem."


 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 09-16-2005, 07:17 AM:
 
Heard on the news this morning that some places in London have reduced prices by four pence per litre, so the recent rises seem to have been a short term thing.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-17-2005, 05:41 PM:
 
I've just got back from my US west coast trip. The impression I got is that California remains expensive ($3ish in Los Angeles, $3.10-$3.20ish in Santa Barbara and San José), while most gas stations in Oregon and Washington are significantly cheaper - $2.80 seemed to be about the average.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-17-2005, 06:02 PM:
 
From Brad's above post:

quote: BERLIN, Germany (Reuters)
But Koch, 55, said there was no truth to stories published in Bild newspaper on Tuesday and Wednesday that suggested he used dead cats as part of the mix for his organic diesel fuel.
That is an outrageous lie! Below is a photo of Koch's son, Kelvin, collecting a dead cat for his father's car.

 -
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 09-17-2005, 06:05 PM:
 
Nah. No good, I'm afraid. You've got to get 'em before the fur rots off - that's where all the energy is. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 09-17-2005, 07:49 PM:
 
Gosh Leo, I always thought that fur, like hair, didn't decompose and therefore had NO fuel value but just tended to clog up the conversion system.

I would think a naked/skinned cat would be of the optimum value as his fuel source?
 
Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 09-17-2005, 08:59 PM:
 
ew.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-22-2005, 11:44 AM:
 
Monday 'round here, most gas stations were charging $2.49 per gallon for 87 octane. The prices fell to $2.39 for the same grade yesterday. Sam's Club was selling gas (member card required) for $2.35.

Today things are different, thanks to Hurricane Rita churning away in the Gulf. Stations are now in the process of raising prices by as much as 30 cents per gallon. We could be back over $3 per gallon by the weekend. Depending on how bad the Houston area gets smacked (particularly all those big oil and gas refineries around Texas City) we could be looking at $4 or $5 per gallon gasoline.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 09-22-2005, 12:08 PM:
 
It's 2.79 here now. [Mad]

I sometimes get the feeling the oil people don't REALLY see a huge increase in costs....they just raise the prices and blame it on the hurricane or the whatever. Then people are used to higher prices, so they just leave it that way.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-22-2005, 08:54 PM:
 
Last night on Bill O'Rielley he mentioned that if you work the math in reverse that for a gallon of gas to cost 3.00 the barrel of crude wold have to cost over 90.00!

Mark
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 09-22-2005, 11:25 PM:
 
 -
 
Posted by Jeremy Jorgenson (Member # 2989) on 10-23-2005, 10:03 PM:
 
I paid $2.489/gal last night ... the first time less than $2.5 in many many months for me.
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 10-23-2005, 11:14 PM:
 
Driving around tonight showed a great difference in gas prices.

They ranged from $2.69 to $2.36 for unleaded regular. (Unfortunatly, my wife's Acura requires premium...says so in the manual) These are some of the lowest prices since pre-Katrina.

Usually prices are exactly the same all over the area, but they are quite varied right now.
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 10-23-2005, 11:23 PM:
 
Filled up w/prem tonight (due to hurricane panic wiping out the gas supply) for 2.59, same price as regular.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-23-2005, 11:32 PM:
 
Bicycling to work (at least 3 times a week) is already saving me some money. I put 15 gallons into my pickup truck Saturday evening, at $2.36 per gallon. It had been just over a month since my last fill up (Sept. 19 to be exact).

I've never been able to stretch a single tank of gas over a month. The only downside is gas begins to get stale after a month, which explains the 75% of a full tank fuel purchase this time.

Hopefully the gas prices will continue to decline. But I'm going to still keep pedaling to work when I can to maintain that exercise benefit.
 
Posted by Jonathan Worthing (Member # 803) on 10-24-2005, 06:20 AM:
 
Good For You

I use my bicycle as often as possible for small trips.

I can get 4 miles across town in 1/3 of the time it takes In my car.

All this bitching & moaning about fuel prices will not help.

Use less fuel It would be better for you & the environment, the only people who would miss out are the fat cat oil producers, who are [sex] all of us
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 10-24-2005, 07:49 AM:
 
quote:
Use less fuel It would be better for you & the environment, the only people who would miss out are the fat cat oil producers, who are [sex] all of us
Approximately 82% of what you pay at the petrol station is tax. The fattest cat of all, Gordon Brown, benefits far more than the oil companies. Intensive R & D in alternative 'carbon neutral' energy sources and more fuel-efficient vehicles are the answer here, not jumping on the trendy environmentalist bandwagon and labelling all car owners as evil.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-24-2005, 01:28 PM:
 
To get this off of the political path: Regular is $2.649 here now. I have a brother in law in the oil business, he says he thinks this price relief is brief.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 10-25-2005, 02:14 AM:
 
Sorry - got carried away. The price appears to have backed off by a penny a litre or so in the last fortnight here, which, allowing for the tax differential, is probably around half the 20-30 cents a gallon I gather it's fallen in the US.

Significant rises and falls in the petrol pump price tend to follow their equivalent crude price changes by around 4-6 weeks here, whereas in North America consumer prices seem to adjust more quickly - I wonder why.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 10-27-2005, 08:28 AM:
 
quote: finance.canada.com
Royal Dutch Shell posts 67 per cent jump in third-quarter net profit

Canadian Press - Thursday October 27, 2005

LONDON (AP) - Royal Dutch Shell PLC, one of the world's largest oil companies, reported a 67 per cent increase in third-quarter profit Thursday to $9.39 billion US, as soaring oil prices outweighed lost production and damage to rigs from fierce hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.

The results compare with earnings of $5.62 billion a year earlier and were helped by a one-time gain of $1.77 billion, mainly from the sale of pipeline assets held through Gasunie NV in the Netherlands and the valuation of some U.K. gas contracts.

Revenue rose eight per cent to $76.44 billion.

CEO Jeroen van der Veer said despite the impact of the hurricanes, Shell's production outlook for 2005 is around 3.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. That is at the bottom end of its target laid out earlier this year.

Production from the Mars platform in the Gulf of Mexico, which suffered significant damage during hurricane Katrina, is expected to resume in the second half of 2006, the company said. The facility normally churns out around 250,000 barrels a day of crude oil and 365 million cubic feet of gas a day.

Shell said the cost of repairing hurricane damage to rigs and refineries this year and next would be about $350 million after taxes, although much of this should be covered by insurance.

Hurricane Katrina hit in late August, temporarily shutting down at least 80 per cent of Gulf crude oil and natural gas production and crippling many refineries.

Oil prices on the New York Mercantile Exchange peaked at $70.85 a barrel on Aug. 30. Hurricane Rita then followed, delaying a return to usual production.

Shell said adjusted earnings on a current cost of supplies basis - a measurement that strips out the fluctuating value of the company's oil and gas inventories - rose 68 per cent to $7.37 billion from $4.38 billion.

Shares in Royal Dutch Shell rose 1.5 per cent to 1,804 pence ($32.01) on the London Stock Exchange.

Earlier this week, BP PLC said its third-quarter profit rose 34 per cent to $6.53 billion, even as production fell two per cent because of the hurricanes. Exxon Mobil Corp. is expected to report record quarterly earnings later Thursday.

A jump in profits. Who whould'a thunk.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-27-2005, 12:05 PM:
 
Still pedaling the bike. Kinda chilly in the mornings, but at least I don't live up in Colorado where a foot of snow could get dumped on you without notice.

To get to the point, the Phillips 66 station near my home dropped their price for 87 octane to $2.25 per gallon. A couple friends in Oklahoma City say they're paying $2.10 to $2.20.
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 10-27-2005, 02:07 PM:
 
Central Ohio is running $2.10 to $2.20 with a couple of mavericks coming in under $2.

One particular area of town consistently has the cheapest prices. It is in a suburb on the far west side of town. The MEIJERS station (Meijers is a chain with giant stores much like a WalMart) seems to drive prices there.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-27-2005, 03:10 PM:
 
Down to $2.499 here right now. Everyone's talking about how wonderful that is, but it's still about 50¢ higher than we were last year at this time. How soon people forget.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-27-2005, 05:09 PM:
 
Exxon posted $10 Billion in profits for the previous quarter today. It's an all time record for quarterly profits.

Still, Exxon's stock declined a bit. It seems the investors were expecting even more. Perhaps if they jack up gas prices back over $3 per gallon, outsource any office jobs they can to India and then replace as many American workers with illegal immigrant labor that may make for a better report next quarter. In American business the only thing that matters is making the next quarterly report look good, no matter the cost!
[thumbsup]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-29-2005, 11:50 AM:
 
Last night I drove to the grocery store to pick up a few things. Gas prices for 87 octane are now down to $2.19. It's $2.16 over at Sam's Club.

But diesel prices? WTMF!!?? Still way freaking high! $2.93 to $2.99 per gallon!

A fellow I know who owns a few Phillips 66 gas stations and convenience stores is starting to sell BioDiesel fuel.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 10-29-2005, 12:11 PM:
 
I don't understand diesel pricing. Diesel is easier to produce, requires less refining. It always used to be cheaper than gasoline. Then somewhere along the way diesel prices shot up to where they're usually the same as or even higher than gasoline. I guess they're just doing it (charging more) just because they can. Those bastards! [Wink]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-29-2005, 01:11 PM:
 
The oil companies know they have many commercial businesses bent over a barrel with their pants stuck around their ankles.

John Q. Public types can consolidate trips, take mass transit, become intrepid bicycle riders and more to cut gasoline consumption.

Businesses don't have the same options. If you depend on using semi-trucks, crane trucks, trucks that haul trailers, etc. you're likely using trucks which require diesel to run. The oil companies know this and they are very clearly taking advantage of the situation.
 
Posted by Joshua Lott (Member # 240) on 10-29-2005, 06:05 PM:
 
$2.77 for regular... upto over $3.00/ gallon for the "good stuff"
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 10-30-2005, 11:38 AM:
 
$2.37 around here for 87...
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-06-2005, 01:20 PM:
 
This weekend gas prices here (for 87 octane unleaded) dropped below $2 per gallon. Some stations were as low as $1.94

I still think that's high. With the mild weather forecast this week I'll be bike riding.

Several CEOs for major oil corporations will be on Capitol Hill to discuss why they made record breaking profits this past quarter and what they intend to do to improve refining capacity.

Gas prices have many of us peeved (especially with how diesel still remains strangely high in price and close to that $3 per gallon level here). But I wish there was the same level of anger about the uncontrolled run up on health care prices, as well as price spikes in housing and higher education. That stuff costs a lot more than gasoline.
 
Posted by Richard Greco (Member # 2032) on 11-06-2005, 09:22 PM:
 
I filled up today for 2.39......3 hours later same station was 2.36.

I can't wait for it to drop below 2.00 here
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-06-2005, 11:02 PM:
 
quote: David Stambaugh
I don't understand diesel pricing. Diesel is easier to produce, requires less refining. It always used to be cheaper
True, diesel is easier to "crack" than gasoline, but the demand for diesel is ten times less than the demand for gasoline. Thus, to manufacture diesel is more costly in the long run for the manufacturers who can't make a profit pricing diesel back to the glory days of 30 cents cheaper than gasoline when the demand is so low.

Once again, it's the "supply and demand" thingey. And with lease programs where one can get into a gas-guzzler vehicle on $250/month payments, then be "flushing the toilet" during the lease term, to where at the end of the term start over again with another lease and do the "toilet flushing" cycle all over again.

Forget about owning a vehicle-it's not heard of in these day and ages.

With this trend, automakers are rolling in the dough with the massive increase of gas guzzler vehicles on the road, thus massively continually increasing the demand for gas, which is shoving the price of diesel skywards with the demand plummeting downwards to just the "PowerStrokes", "Cummins" and "Detroit Allison" diesel users.

Only way for diesel prices to start to nose down is for GM to return making their diesel cars like they did back in the early 80's. But instead of taking a 350cid motor and converting this motor to diesel without the necessary modifications, start fom the ground up with a completely new design. But this will definitely drive the price of the car skyhigh, thus creating a no-win situation here for both GM and the consumer.

Yea, talk about gas prices, we folks here in Idaho are STILL higher than the rest of you folks out there - Posting $2.62/gal and this is going under the commerce department for investigation on why our prices are much higher than the rest of the union. And this is not the first time, that "price gouging" was under attack.

-Monte
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 11-07-2005, 08:29 AM:
 
A month ago, with auto fuel at $3.10 and 100LL at the airport at $2.89; some used aviation fuel in their cars to save money. Louis
 
Posted by Dieter Depypere (Member # 3184) on 11-07-2005, 08:38 AM:
 
Aviation fuel for cars?? Does that work?
 
Posted by Roger Manning Jr (Member # 1560) on 11-07-2005, 09:09 AM:
 
I paid $2.56 at costco this weekend for reg. Cost $85.00 to fill up. It's running around $2.85 every place else. Glad I did not get a diesel truck, diesel is about $3.35
Roger
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 11-07-2005, 09:29 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
But I wish there was the same level of anger about the uncontrolled run up on health care prices, as well as price spikes in housing and higher education. That stuff costs a lot more than gasoline.

Bobby,

You are aware that we have a capitalist economy where supply and demand determine the price? In the case of higher education it is supply/demand of quality professors which drive up their salaries which then drives up tuition.

Health care is the only one that is driven by something other than supply/demand. The high cost of health care is largely driven by malpractice insurance and "defensive medicine" due to ridiculous lawsuits. Real and major tort reform is the only way to bring down health care costs.

If the price of gas wasn't supply/demand driven and was just the oil companies gauging us for profit, then why is the price coming down now? Did they suddenly decide (illegally in collusion with eachother) that they had made enough profit for the year and now they will make a little less?

If we use less gas the price will come down. There are more and more people like you who are biking to work/carpooling now because of the price. The issue is that if the price gets below $2, most will just go back to what they were doing before which will increase the price again.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-07-2005, 01:20 PM:
 
quote: Dieter Depypere
Aviation fuel for cars?? Does that work?

Sure, 100 "Blue" is gas - just a higher octane. "Red" was the fuel that race car drivers love to use being a 108 octane so they can run almost 13/1 compression.

-Monte

[ 11-08-2005, 01:12 AM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 11-07-2005, 05:20 PM:
 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
A month ago, with auto fuel at $3.10 and 100LL at the airport at $2.89; some used aviation fuel in their cars to save money.
I've never accidentally done that, honest!

Actually, my lawn mower runs great on 100LL.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-08-2005, 12:34 AM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
You are aware that we have a capitalist economy where supply and demand determine the price? In the case of higher education it is supply/demand of quality professors which drive up their salaries which then drives up tuition.
If that was truly the case you would only see the prices rising at certain shi shi private schools. The costs are escalating far beyond the rate of inflation everywhere. Many university trustees know this very well and know the American market can't really support these huge price increases. So they're lobbying hard as hell to get as many students as possible from other countries.

quote: Lyle Romer
Health care is the only one that is driven by something other than supply/demand. The high cost of health care is largely driven by malpractice insurance and "defensive medicine" due to ridiculous lawsuits. Real and major tort reform is the only way to bring down health care costs.
It will take a LOT more than tort reform to remedy the runaway costs happening in that sector.

A HUGE part of the problem is the blank check given to the health care industrial complex by Uncle Sam. I do include malpractice trial lawyers in with that "complex." The malpractice insurance factor and tort reform issues are real. However many doctor run assocations provide most malpractice insurance, not traditional insurance companies or reinsurers.

There are some social factors and some very unethical business factors that force health care prices higher. The government is looking the other way, allowing lots of large businesses to hire people off the books and get paid cash under the table. Home builders have many layers of subcontractors that make it easy to do this. They pay next to nothing in benefits and dodge workers comp insurance premiums. If one of those workers gets hurt, he just goes to the hospital on his own and says he has no income and is unemployed. The hospital has to treat the guy. But then they pass that bill 3-fold onto the next working man who comes in without health insurance. There's 50 million American workers who fit that description. When one of those workers is bankrupted by the tab, the tax base picks up the rest of the bill.

Anyway...

...to get back to the subject of gas prices, I was driving a company truck in Duncan, OK today and was amazed to see one gas station there selling 87 octane for $1.79 per gallon.

Hope the downward trend keeps going.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 11-08-2005, 02:19 AM:
 
quote: Dieter Depypere
Aviation fuel for cars?? Does that work?
I don't see that many Ford Mondeos passing overhead at 20,000 feet, so I guess not!

A few years ago police in Wales busted a scam whereby Diesel powered cars were being run on used vegetable oil from a chain of fish & chip shops, in an attempt to avoid paying the duty on legit road fuel. Apparently the engine management computers in modern Diesel cars are so sophisticated that they can easily tweak the ignition settings to enable them to burn the stuff quite happily. The only problem is the smell of frying chips coming out of the exhaust pipe, thereby making the crime not that hard to detect.

Given that vegetable oil is renewable energy (i.e. biofuel), if I was the government I'd be encouraging the practice, not trying to stamp it out. Besides, there probably isn't enough of the stuff about to seriously dent fuel duty revenues.

Petrol has come down by a penny or two a litre at most places in the last fortnight or so, though I get the impression that Diesel hasn't. LPG remains the same at 37.9p at the place I usually fill up: it's been unchanged throughout the summer/autumn price bubble.
 
Posted by Mark Hajducki (Member # 1732) on 11-08-2005, 05:33 AM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Given that vegetable oil is renewable energy (i.e. biofuel), if I was the government I'd be encouraging the practice, not trying to stamp it out. Besides, there probably isn't enough of the stuff about to seriously dent fuel duty revenues.
I doubt that using food grade vegtable oil is much better than using the non-renewable oils once the energy used in farming, processing and transporting are taken into account.

If produced for fuel use (using higer yeiding but less edible plants) or if recycled then this would probably be a more sustainable source of fuel.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-08-2005, 07:37 AM:
 
There's a growing number of people here in the United States running their vehicles off stuff like used cooking oil. Country singer Willie Nelson has a tour bus that runs off that stuff. But it's not quite the same as fuel grade biodiesel.

Biodiesel 101
quote:
Is Biodiesel the same thing as raw vegetable oil?
No! Fuel-grade biodiesel must be produced to strict industry specifications (ASTM D6751) in order to insure proper performance. Biodiesel is the only alternative fuel to have fully completed the health effects testing requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Biodiesel that meets ASTM D6751 and is legally registered with the Environmental Protection Agency is a legal motor fuel for sale and distribution. Raw vegetable oil cannot meet biodiesel fuel specifications, it is not registered with the EPA, and it is not a legal motor fuel.


 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 11-08-2005, 12:57 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
A few years ago police in Wales busted a scam whereby Diesel powered cars were being run on used vegetable oil from a chain of fish & chip shops, in an attempt to avoid paying the duty on legit road fuel.
Naughty naughty. A variation on the old "drop of the red"...

Here in NZ petrol (gas) is taxed at the pump, but all other fuels that could be used to propel vehicles isn't, what you do is buy "road user charges" by distance, so you cant dodge tax the same way.

Makes it much easier from a regulatory point of view, and will become easier when other alternative fuels come along and The Chancellor wants his pound of flesh :-)
 
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 05-04-2007, 04:28 AM:
 

It has been 541 days since the last post.


 
Posted by Tristan Lane (Member # 1169) on 05-04-2007, 04:28 AM:
 
.....Bump

My how things have changed.

I paid $3.50 a gallon tonight in Portland to fill my car with "plus". Regular was priced at 3.41, and Premium was priced at a whopping 3.62 a gallon.

I'd give anything to be paying 1.48 a gallon.

[fu] to whoever is responsible for these insane gas prices.
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-04-2007, 09:14 AM:
 
Belgium 1.34Euros per litre.

Coverts to $1.82usd per litre.

1 litre equals 0.264 gallons.

Means we're paying about $6.86 a gallon.

You guys feel better now? [Frown]
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-04-2007, 10:09 AM:
 
I'm told that it's about 92p per litre here; I thought it was more than that, but I never buy the stuff myself. That converts to about $1.83 per litre. That works out to $6.95 per (US) gallon.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 05-04-2007, 10:38 AM:
 
Yeah John but since Europe is the size of a large shopping mall, with a little walk you could be in Paris in no time [Wink] [Razz] . Speaking of which, why are foreign gas prices so high? Where does the extra money go?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-04-2007, 10:58 AM:
 
The price is currently $2.89 per gallon (for 87 octane "regular unleaded) around these parts. The price has gone up almost a full dollar since January. And that's despite the fact oil is still trading in the $60-$65 per barrel range. We're paying as if oil had risen to near $80 per barrel.
[Mad]
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 05-04-2007, 11:45 AM:
 
Paying $3.29 USD per gallon for Premium (unleaded 91 octane) in this part of Sin City. Fortunately the scooter gets me four round trips to work, about 60 miles, on the 1.3 gallons it holds.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 05-04-2007, 11:46 AM:
 
[deleted]

[ 05-04-2007, 07:28 PM: Message edited by: Paul Mayer ]
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-04-2007, 12:17 PM:
 
quote: Mike Heenan
Speaking of which, why are foreign gas prices so high? Where does the extra money go?

Most of it is tax.
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 05-04-2007, 01:26 PM:
 
I honestly don't know what gas prices here in Denver are. I really don't pay attention, especially since I pay with a credit card. I just pull up, pump, and GTFO. Fortunately since my non-hybrid (it's a real car) gets 40mpg or more in the city, I'm not at the pump very often.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 05-04-2007, 04:02 PM:
 
It was $3.399 at the ARCO where I filled up yesterday. I normally fill up every 100 miles or so to minimize the shock, even with a car that averages about 24 mpg.

Yesterday night, though, I learned of a gas station in San Diego County selling gas for seven bucks a gallon. [Eek!] Granted, it's in a rich-person's enclave with a high concentration of Ferraris and the like and owners who have no problem forking over that kind of cash for 100-octane gas to make their Prancing Horses gallop faster...
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-05-2007, 01:01 AM:
 
Yeah Mike...taxes. [evil]
 
Posted by Chad M Calpito (Member # 3736) on 05-05-2007, 01:42 AM:
 
The most I pay is at $3.69/gallon of gas at my local Chevron Gas Station for the 91 Octance Gas. Ouch! [Mad]
 
Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 1016) on 05-05-2007, 02:05 AM:
 
Today I got gas for $2.99/gal although I drove by a couple places that were over $3 first... [Frown]
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 05-05-2007, 02:20 AM:
 
Although I still own a car, I only use it when I go on photographic assignments or when using public transportation is not convenient. Now that I am over 65 years of age, I qualify for a senior citizen bus pass for $30.00 a year on Honolulu's excellent award winning transit system. Because I now ride the bus a lot, what would cost me about $250.00 for regular unleaded gas a month if I used my car, is only about $50.00. The grade of gas I use is about $3,25 a gallon here in Honolulu at the present time where I go for a fill up.

-Claude
 
Posted by Rick Raskin (Member # 1561) on 05-05-2007, 07:50 AM:
 
I paid $285.9 this morning for 87 octaine.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-05-2007, 01:25 PM:
 
$309.9 at Maverick today for 87 octane.... 85 Octane is 295.9
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-05-2007, 01:32 PM:
 
Just went over $3 here for regular. $3.02 this morning. Damn, should've filled up last night and saved 36 cents.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-06-2007, 02:46 AM:
 
Boise/Nampa area is now 3.159 .. Maverik manages to be a few cents cheaper..3.099 .. All due to the one pipeline coming from the refineries in the Bountiful/N.SLC area that feeds Idaho..

quote: Jon Miller
forking over that kind of cash for 100-octane gas to make their Prancing Horses gallop faster...

Yet, what's funny is that 100 Octane stuff can be purchased out at airports cheaper since it's the same grade that light aircraft uses...the "Blue" AvGas...
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-06-2007, 03:35 AM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
$309.9 at Maverick today
WOW! That is expensive...is that per gallon? [Wink]
 
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 05-06-2007, 04:02 AM:
 
I saw someone write it out that way on a different forum too *shrug* I guess its a common way to do it.
 
Posted by Phil Blake (Member # 2012) on 05-06-2007, 07:57 AM:
 
you guys are catching up fast , the country prices in my area southern Australia works out at $4.02US a gallon.

I am lead to believe over 60% of that sale price is made up from govt charges and taxes. A very high price indeed when most of our petroleum is made from Australian produced oil .
 
Posted by Damien Taylor (Member # 4255) on 05-06-2007, 09:06 AM:
 
Geez, thems pretty rough prices Phil.

The Cheapest petrol in the entire metro area of Perth was $4.64 a gallon, or $1.23 a litre.

I no longer fear being mugged since i'm robbed every day at the bowser.
 
Posted by James Westbrook (Member # 3690) on 05-06-2007, 04:27 PM:
 
We are blessed with some competitive retailers out here: One of the Bolton stations (locally owned) has regular unleaded at 2.85.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 05-06-2007, 07:18 PM:
 
Lowest I've seen this weekend is $2.79 for regular, typical is
$2.85.

I saw on t.v. Friday that crude is $10. lower now than it was
last year this time yet the retail is significantly higher. We must be getting screwed by the fat cat commodities traders. Another issue is the world wide shortage of refining capacity caused by the enviro-nazis and the not-in-my-backyard syndrome.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-06-2007, 07:41 PM:
 
...another thing is people need to learn that their gas guzzling $UVs and $40K 4x4 pickups that they never use on the dirt roads-both are just cruising toys doesn't help with the fuel crisis either. America needs to learn that they can't take their living room on the road...they need to adjust..or at least help out. (But, "OH" this is what the auto dealers are really pushing for since both the factory and the dealers make huge banks on these vehicles...not the econoboxes and captive imports..)

Another wrench in this machinery IMO, is that the availability of buyin a new car on the whim with the usage of leases which can gives practically anyone the power to get a new vehicle..and with this, the industry pumps out the cars, dealers really raking in the dough and the world is flooded with cars that is gobbling up our resourses at an alarming rate. The pride of ownership has almost all but diminished - now just a throwaway and recycle society.

Woo..maybe, we'll be seeing federal mandated 55mph speed limits again...bringing back old memories of the Embargos of '73 and '79 - in which the first embargo, is when I said goodbye to V-8 vehicles and converted to import, high quality economy cars.
 
Posted by James Westbrook (Member # 3690) on 05-07-2007, 11:07 AM:
 
I jinxed myself...
2.99 this morning. [Frown]
 
Posted by Mike Spaeth (Member # 524) on 05-07-2007, 03:57 PM:
 
Paid $2.889 this afternoon.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-07-2007, 04:14 PM:
 
Prices have been creeping up here over the last 4-6 weeks, too. Before Easter there weren't many places round here at over 92p a litre for standard 95 octane unleaded: now it's around 97p (equivalent to $8.32 for a US gallon) at most of the local filling stations. I'm not sure why this hasn't attracted much in the way of media coverage: the last time petrol prices were nudging towards a pound a litre was in the summer of 2005, and it became a significant political issue then.

Getting my car converted to run on LPG in November 2004 has turned out to be one of the best investments I ever made. Based on the differential between LPG and petrol prices then, I worked out that the conversion would take around 30-35k miles to cover its costs. That differential got significantly bigger almost as soon as the LPG kit was installed (petrol was around 87p a litre at the time, LPG around 40p), and I've now done 53k miles since the conversion.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-07-2007, 04:51 PM:
 
Leo, do you have any problems finding fuel for it. It's not something that I'm looking out for, but I seldom seem to see LPG signs outside filling stations. Can you still use petrol as well, or will it only run on LPG now?
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 05-07-2007, 05:14 PM:
 
What is LPG?
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-07-2007, 05:26 PM:
 
Liquified Petroleum Gas (Propane and Butane); I'm not sure which is used in cars, propane has a higher vapour pressure than butane, and can be used at lower temperatures.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-08-2007, 02:30 AM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
Leo, do you have any problems finding fuel for it. It's not something that I'm looking out for, but I seldom seem to see LPG signs outside filling stations.
Not in this neck of the woods: I'd guess it's available in about a quarter of filling stations within a 50-mile radius of York. Given that Yorkshire is pretty rural and lots of people commute relatively long distances, there's probably a bigger market for LPG than there would be in more urban areas. When I did the sums it became clear that the capital investment in the conversion (£1,200) only makes economic sense for a driver doing over 15k miles a year. The tax break means that my car costs around 6-7p a mile for fuel on LPG, rising to 11-12p when running on petrol. At that rate, the LPG conversion will cover its costs in about two years assuming 15k miles annually; but if you're doing nearer the UK average of 8-10k, you're looking at 3 to 4 years, which is longer than most people keep their cars. I've only found one garage in London near my mother's house which sells it, although I gather that there has been a surge in conversions recently, because 'alternative fuel' vehicles get a discount on the congestion charge.

quote: Stephen Furley
Can you still use petrol as well, or will it only run on LPG now?
Yes; it'll still run on petrol. The conversion consists of a pressurised, 70-litre gas cylinder in the boot (enough gas for around 300 miles), a replacement engine management computer and a regulator/injector device which sits on the cylinder block. The LPG system has separate injectors (installing them involves drilling a hole through the engine block straight into the cylinders), but uses the same exhaust valves as when burning petrol. Because the gas burns at a significantly higher temperature than petrol, the car is started on petrol and the fuel source is switched over when a pre-set temperature is reached. This is usually around 2-3 miles after starting from cold. Apart from the routing the power supply to the existing fuel pump through the new ECU (so that it can be switched off when the fuel source is changed to LPG) the existing fuel system is untouched and it can be changed back to petrol at any time. It will also switch back automatically if you run out of gas.

quote: Stephen Furley
Liquified Petroleum Gas (Propane and Butane); I'm not sure which is used in cars, propane has a higher vapour pressure than butane, and can be used at lower temperatures.
It's propane here, though I gather that butane is sometimes used in mainland Europe.
 
Posted by Damien Taylor (Member # 4255) on 05-08-2007, 05:42 AM:
 
The West Australian government, more precisely the department of consumer protection along with the local radio and TV stations run Fuel Watch.

Is this initiative being run anywhere else in the world? It seems like a great idea, has saved me heaps in the past. The website says its unique, I just wasn't sure if they were tooting their horn.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-08-2007, 02:29 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
70-litre gas cylinder in the boot
(and for us folks across the pond, the "boot" is the trunk, the "bonnet" is the hood. 70L..about 18.5 US gal)

Interesting that LPG usage can render high mileage like that where I thought LPG has lower BTU's than gasoline (petrol) contains and the motor would need more LPG for the same BTU output to match the gasoline's BTU.
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 05-08-2007, 02:39 PM:
 
The last station before going into the Lincoln Tunnel from New Jersey was $3.05 a gallon. (and they pump it for you in this state)
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-08-2007, 03:47 PM:
 
Monte: absolutely right - the miles driven per volume of the substance burnt is around 40% lower on LPG than it is on petrol (gasoline), but the much lower tax on LPG you pay here offsets that. When you've done all the maths, you're looking at a 30%-ish reduction in pennies for fuel spent per mile driven on LPG relative to petrol. When I looked into this, I came to the following conclusion:

If you drive under 10k miles per year, it's not worth any capital investment in fuel saving technology, because your fuel costs are a relatively small proportion of your total motoring costs.

If you drive between 10k and 15k miles per year and tend to buy either new cars or second hand ones in the 30k miles/2 years old bracket, then a reasonably fuel efficient diesel is worth the slightly higher purchase price, but a petrol/LPG probably isn't worth the investment in the conversion unless you're buying a new car and planning to keep it for at least 5-6 years.

If you do over 15k miles a year and/or buy high mileage cars and do some or all of your own maintenance to keep them on life support, a petrol engined car with an LPG kit makes sense. Added to which, if you need to drive into central London regularly, where having an LPG-powered car lets you off the £8 per day charge, LPG could also make sense for that reason.

Britain hasn't really got into biofuel yet - when we do, it'll be interesting to see if there are any tax carrots or sticks involved with that.
 
Posted by Damien Taylor (Member # 4255) on 05-08-2007, 08:31 PM:
 
Doesn't LPG slash your performance and engine life expectancy?, Or have the oil companies succeeded in making me swallow their propaganda
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 05-08-2007, 09:54 PM:
 
Performance will be somewhat lower but engine life should be the same or better since there should be no dilution of the oil
by liquid fuel.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-09-2007, 01:10 AM:
 
Agreed. You notice the acceleration performance drop when the car changes from petrol to gas. There's a hill on the drive out of town here which, running on petrol, can be driven happily in fourth gear. Running on gas, it needs third. As for engine wear, the oil still looks completely clear when it's replaced every 5k miles, just as if it was brand new out of the bottle.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-12-2007, 06:58 PM:
 
Here's a page that someone coverted a vehicle to LPG usage. Quite interesting. - Monte
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-13-2007, 12:02 PM:
 
305.9 without the discount card... Both Smith's and Maverick near my house have been having a gas war for the better part of a year and keeping the price down. 3 cents cheaper with the card or buying $25.00 worth of groceries at Smith's... so its more reasonable here than many other areas around Utah.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-13-2007, 01:36 PM:
 
The price here in Lawton shot up to $3.11 for 87 octane.

Meanwhile, oil is currently trading at $62.37 per barrel.

I was used to $3.00 per gallon gasoline when oil was trading in the $75 per barrel range. It doesn't make any sense for the prices of gasoline to be as high as they are with oil being priced as low as it is.

I think the oil companies are deliberately making less gasoline to inflate the prices and their profits.
 
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 05-14-2007, 06:29 PM:
 
Yikes! At $3.11 that's over $130 a barrel(US)!! Nothing like a 100% gross profit.
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 05-15-2007, 02:45 PM:
 
On 62nd and York on the East side of Manhattan gas is at:

Premium $ 3.95

Regular $ 3.55

Economy $ 3.15

and it going to get higher as we move int Summer.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 05-15-2007, 11:53 PM:
 
I also find it curious how when there is an increase in the price/barrel that there is an instant reflection in an increase at the pump, BUT when the price/barrel drops there is a significant lag in the drop, if any, in the price at the pump. We're difinelty gett'n [sex] .
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 07-31-2007, 08:34 PM:
 
Its interesting to note the last two days going across Nevada and California that gas prices in both these states is way less than in Utah. Normally its the other way round. In the LA area the cheapest I've found is 2.749 a gallon... Nevada is a little higher but not much. Utah is still around 2.899 per gallon.

Mark
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 07-31-2007, 09:05 PM:
 
quote: Jeremy Weigel
difinelty
Well that's the worst spelling of "definitely" I've ever seen. Why does the world have such trouble with that word?

Gas here = $2.99 since the end of June.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-01-2007, 12:13 AM:
 
I just gassed up in Buena Park an hour ago and it was 2.719 at Shell.

Mark
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 08-01-2007, 12:22 AM:
 
Just filled up my tank at a Union 76 here in Waipahu for $3.30 a gallon for the medium grade yesterday. Hawaii right now has the highest price for gas in the country

-Claude
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-01-2007, 12:27 AM:
 
Gas prices are FINALLY falling around here. For more than a month 87 octane fuel has been up over $3.00 per gallon. The price peaked at over $3.20 in early July. It fell to $2.99 a few days ago and now rests at $2.89. Some other areas in Oklahoma are selling gas for 20 cents cheaper.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 08-01-2007, 12:34 AM:
 
We're playing in the low to mid 2.90's so far in W. Idaho .. with Wally's World/Mirastar hanging in the upper 2.80's
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 08-01-2007, 01:18 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Gas prices are FINALLY falling around here. For more than a month 87 octane fuel has been up over $3.00 per gallon. The price peaked at over $3.20 in early July. It fell to $2.99 a few days ago and now rests at $2.89. Some other areas in Oklahoma are selling gas for 20 cents cheaper.
Bobby, here in Edmond it's down to 2.699.

quote: Mike Blakesley
Well that's the worst spelling of "definitely" I've ever seen. Why does the world have such trouble with that word?
Sorry Mike, I must not have re-read it before hitting the "Add Reply". But I do agree, its one the most mis-spelled words.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 08-01-2007, 01:20 PM:
 
Mozilla Firefox has a built in spell checker. It doesn't catch everything, but will underline anything you type in red it doesn't understand. Just right-click and select the proper spelling.

quote: Jeremy Weigel
Bobby, here in Edmond it's down to 2.699.
That figures.

Just about any time I or any local friends head to the Oklahoma City area we usually observe gas prices being at least 10 cents lower than prices in Lawton. It's rare for OKC area prices to be the same or higher. Lately the difference has been 20 cents. And I don't understand that considering the latest excuse for price gouging was the flooding and shut down of the gasoline refinery in Southeast Kansas.
 
Posted by Rick Raskin (Member # 1561) on 08-01-2007, 05:09 PM:
 
I saw gas today for $2.65/gal. It's been up near $2.90 since Spring but recently began to decline. Gas was $2.62/gal. in Richmond, VA when I was there in late June, so it's probably cheaper now.
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 08-01-2007, 06:39 PM:
 
With these prices, I noticed that most gas pumps have a $75 limit, where it will just shut off when it reaches that amount. Of course, my truck takes about $78 to completely fill the tank, and I'm not going cycle my credit card again. No real hardship, but it one of those things that bugs you.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 08-01-2007, 07:21 PM:
 
The cheap stuff is around 2.67 at the Arco on one corner here, and about 10 cents more at the surrounding stations. I've found in various spots around Phoenix and Mesa as cheap as 2.60. What's really odd is that oil has supposedly risen to it's highest cost, but yet the cost of gas keeps dropping bit by bit. What gives? Does it show that the panic mark ups of $3+ a gallon some months back (when oil was the same or slightly lower than it is now) were total BS (thank you, you speculators!)? Or are there other forces at work to keep gas costs dropping down?
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 08-01-2007, 07:27 PM:
 
$2.65 here in Louisville according to "LouisvilleGasPrices.com.

You know you are abused when you FEEL GOOD about paying more than $1.75/gallon.

(Discover pays 6% cash back on gas for new sign ups; not too bad when this nets you almost 14 cent on each gallon.)
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 08-01-2007, 08:41 PM:
 
John to ease your pain, send your credit card to me and I promise to only use it once each day. This will make you feel better and once a month I will send you a stick of gum.

Let me know what you like?

Louis, I will be happy to offer you the same deal.
 
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 08-02-2007, 08:02 AM:
 
$2.69 in Florence Kentucky.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-02-2007, 06:18 PM:
 
In far west end of Richmond in the Short Pump area $2.59.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-02-2007, 06:44 PM:
 
In Agoura Hills its 3.059. A bit higher than it is down in the south part of L.A.

Mark
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 08-03-2007, 09:24 AM:
 
I paid $2.62 at a raceway just north of the GA/FL border on I-95 yesterday.
 
Posted by Gracia L. Babbidge (Member # 582) on 08-04-2007, 01:56 PM:
 
What I've been seeing in the Lisbon Falls / Topsham / Brunswick area this week has been about $2.899. Damn tourist season.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 08-04-2007, 07:38 PM:
 
In Virginia Beach today $2.55
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 08-05-2007, 05:01 PM:
 
I saw $2.59 at one gas station this morning.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 08-05-2007, 05:32 PM:
 
I gave up paying for gas... I just siphon it out of the neighbor's gas tank.

Mark: You were in L.A. and didn't call me!??? I would have liked to have got together for dinner...you buy. And then we could have gone out to a gay "bear" club where you'd be a "hit"! HA! [Wink]
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-06-2007, 10:44 PM:
 
Phil,

It was a rush trip for sure. Mainly to visit DTS and come up to speed on repairing XD-10's. Also paid a visit to Christie and QSC while I was there. We had Cine-X35's being built at Christie last Wednesday and I needed to be there to make sure it was getting done correctly..... actually caught them on one issue!! But hey, those guys at Christie have it together man... they easily put Stong to shame [Big Grin] . I guess thats partly why they shipped twice as many projectors last year as Strong did.

Hey, I'll go to a gay bar with you any time... I have no problem with that! There is a Gay bar a half block south of CLACO! Dang, I coulda taken you down a gravel road in the Land Rover at 100mph so you could tell every one here I'm not BS'n about that one [Cool] . Thats way more fun than the big coaster at Knotts Berry Farm! I'll be out again pretty soon.

Mark
 
Posted by Troy Hilsman Powell (Member # 4326) on 08-07-2007, 12:58 AM:
 
Gas here in detroit is about $2.80 a gallon.Last week it was $3.10
 
Posted by Damien Taylor (Member # 4255) on 08-07-2007, 01:40 AM:
 
Good lord. The motor city won't be doing a great deal of motoring at that price.
 
Posted by German Marin (Member # 918) on 08-14-2007, 03:08 AM:
 
Italy:
€ 1.37 a liter = $ 6.74 a gallon

Germany:
€ 1.35 liter = $ 6.63 a gallon

Switzerland:
CHF 1.705 a liter = € 1.05 a liter = $ 5.16 a gallon

Here in Italy unleaded prices never NEVER fall...
Barrel prices go up... gas prices go up... barrel prices fall... gas prices go up... [Confused]
 
Posted by Michael Coate (Member # 757) on 11-13-2007, 06:32 PM:
 
Prices are rising again. [Mad] I filled up yesterday at a station in L.A.'s San Fernando Valley and paid $3.35/gallon. My tank was nearly empty, and with an 18-gallon capacity I dropped nearly $60.00. Ouch!

Anyway, I'm preparing another road trip, and so that I can advantageously budget and plot my trip I am curious what prices are in other parts of the U.S.
 
Posted by Ray Faultless (Member # 903) on 11-13-2007, 07:01 PM:
 
In the UK now around £1.00 per litre.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-13-2007, 10:14 PM:
 
It's $3.05 for 87 octane here in Lawton, OK. Considering this is "oil country" this is supposed to be one of the least expensive places in the United States to buy gasoline.

Get out that bicycle and start pedaling!
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-13-2007, 10:20 PM:
 
Here, "regular" went from $2.939 to $3.149 in one jump three days ago.
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 11-13-2007, 10:59 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Considering this is "oil country" this is supposed to be one of the least expensive places in the United States to buy gasoline.
Both when I lived in Seattle and in Bellingham for college, Bellingham had the highest priced gas of the entire Puget Sound region despite the fact that Bellingham has an oil refinery.
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 11-14-2007, 12:51 AM:
 
Want a bad oil country story... in many many places in Canada (which has enough oil that it doesn't need to import any) you can cross the US border and buy imported (from Canada) gas for 25% less than you can buy the same gas on the Canadian side of the border.
 
Posted by Scott McGuire (Member # 4508) on 11-14-2007, 01:05 AM:
 
$3.30 here in upstate ny. At this point i don't think it matters where you are if barrel prices drop back to what they were 6 months ago gallon prices won't drop that far. They will raise it to $4.50 and then bring it back to $3.50 and we will all think it's a great price.
 
Posted by Jonathan Worthing (Member # 803) on 11-14-2007, 04:56 AM:
 
[Frown] [Frown] £1.02 Per litre. Yes that is around 9.00USD per gallon

Our government are [sex] us with duty.

I think we should invade a country to get there oil so we can pay under $4.00 per gallon.

[Roll Eyes] Sorry that will not work.
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 11-14-2007, 07:20 AM:
 
Paid $3.62 yesterday at a highway rest stop (which tend to be more expensive) here in Connecticut.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 11-14-2007, 08:29 PM:
 
Here in Sin City, regular is running between $2.97 and $3.29 USD per gallon. Premium is running between $3.18 and $3.49 USD per gallon.

Been on the 50cc scooter for a year now. Runs me about a buck a day commuting about 30 miles a day to work and school.
 
Posted by Kurt Zupin (Member # 2751) on 11-15-2007, 12:44 AM:
 
Just filled up the Explorer and it was $2.97 at the Quick Trip. Over 50 bucks to fill up the beast.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-15-2007, 02:06 AM:
 
...and I filled up My Suzuki Wgn for $38.00 with the trip odometer hitting close to 400 miles...

It's fun watching people with large, expensive rigs either shove credit cards to fill those things, or can only shove in 5 to 10 bucks of fuel since that's all the money they have and can afford.

Also, you're getting to see a LOT of these large gas-guzzling vehicles in the used car lots in massive quanities, sometimes with huge price reductions, giving the dealers to find a way to move these units out and bring in more inventory-with some of these units being repossessed, lease returns or voluntary repossesion.

Yet, also sad as I was filling my vehicle, was thinking that when gas was $ .309/gal, that a buck would get you three point plus gallons back in 1972. Now, it takes 10 bucks for that same three point plus gallons.

Driving to SLC and back to E. Idaho was a 10 dollar fill..easy pocket change. NOW, the drive from Boise to SLC is now almost a $100.00 bill to blow. Shoot, one now can fly from Boise to SLC cheaper than it is to drive ...

Better watch out, going to be another speed limit reduction again like when the Embargo of 1973 and 1979 hit the USA...and what's good (or bad on how you look at it..) is the Embargo forced the US automakers to find a way to make more fuel efficent cars since they had only a couple at the time (the Ford Pinto and the Chevy Vega..).

NOW, the trend has returned with these danged "road locomotives" called SUVS and huge ego promoting Pickups that sucks the same amount of fuel as those vehicles in 1973 before the Embargo hit.

But, this time, it's gonna be a lot worse since now India and China have developed into massive industrialized countries that require fossil fuels to run their plants.

..and driving scooters is actually quite fun...

-Monte
 
Posted by Steven J Hart (Member # 2340) on 11-15-2007, 07:15 AM:
 
$3.45 here. The crazy thing is that the huge escalation in the price of crude has not been fueled by any kind of shortage here in the states, but by commodity speculators who contine to buy future contracts at a seemingly insatiable rate.
Steve
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 11-15-2007, 08:58 AM:
 
I highly doubt that you will see speed reductions again based on fuel consumption. It was a flawed idea when it came out and would remain flawed to this day. Market forces are what will/are driving a change in auto purchases and driving habits.

I also don't think it was the gas shortage that got the American Auto manufacturers into more efficient cars in and of its own...but the increase in customer satisfaction with the products made in Japan, which also happened to be much more fuel efficient. In my childhood alone I watched the transition from Japan = Junk to Japan = high quality. In Back to the Future they even make light of it when the 1950s Doc Brown notes that the components are made in Japan and Marty corrects him that "all the best stuff comes from Japan now."

Chrysler, in particular did not adapt to buying trends and continued to produce cars that Americans did not want anymore.

Another thing that happened in the 1970s with the fuel crunch was the emergence of Desiel passenger cars...which ruined the prices on Desiel fuel.

I think it would be very hard indeed to get Americans to accept lower speed limits based on fuel prices/availability. I do think that Hybrids will continue to gain market place and that alternative fuels based vehicles will continue to develop and will eventually replace gasoline based engines. Come on, how efficient is the internal combustion engine? There has got to be a better way. Hydrogen fuel cells look interesting to me.

Steve
 
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 11-15-2007, 01:35 PM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
It's fun watching people with large, expensive rigs either shove credit cards to fill those things, or can only shove in 5 to 10 bucks of fuel since that's all the money they have and can afford.
In the last 9 years I think I've paid cash for gas five times. Credit cards are perfect for paying for gas. It's a fairly regular expense so there's no "surprise" (as in you forgot about it) spending, it's a free month of interest on your money (assuming you're not the type to live on credit), you get to collect whatever reward you get on your credit card purchases (1% cash back, 3% GM dollars, whatever), and it's an excellent way to build and maintain a very good credit rating (assuming, again, that you're not the type to live on credit). IMNSHO, it'd be foolish not to pay for fuel and other *regular* high value expenses with a credit card. Whether paying for your irregular high value expenses with a credit card is a good idea or not is highly dependent on how well you manage money.

quote: Monte L Fullmer
Better watch out, going to be another speed limit reduction again like when the Embargo of 1973 and 1979 hit the USA
That will not happen. Like Steve said, it's flawed logic. Many vehicles get the best mileage around 110-115km/h, which around here is 10-15km/h over the current speed limit on the largest highways.
 
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 11-15-2007, 01:46 PM:
 
And just because someone is swiping a card doesn't mean they're paying with credit. I swipe my Visa debit card all the time, hit the "credit" button (so I don't have to type my PIN number - I'm too lazy for that), and pump away.

quote: Jonathan Worthing
I think we should invade a country to get there oil so we can pay under $4.00 per gallon.
Or we could just drill for our own oil off the coast of Florida... like China is about to start doing. Or in Alaska. Or in any number of other places available to us. Or we could start building cars that run on sugar. That could work too.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 11-15-2007, 02:19 PM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
Hydrogen fuel cells look interesting to me.
Hydrogen fuel cells would be great if we didn't have to produce the hydrogen to run them on. That problem could be alleviated by making a huge push to nuclear power for the power grid and then using excess capacity in off peak times to produce hydrogen from water.
 
Posted by Jack Theakston (Member # 4484) on 11-15-2007, 03:42 PM:
 
$2.83 is about the average in my area here in NJ. That's still $1.84 more than I care to be spending per gallon.
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 11-15-2007, 05:51 PM:
 
Our Grand-Poopie-BAH told me he remembers when regular gasoline was $0.19.9 a gallon.

Of course, that was WAY B4 MY time! HA!

I just filled up at my local Chevron at $2.24 a gallon.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-15-2007, 06:18 PM:
 
Or, we could try these tricks that Prof. Kipkay lays out for us here.

On the topic of using Acetone, I've tried this stuff in the mix and it does actually work. I gained 2 to 4 mpg in my daily driving.

There are many add-ons that work, somewhat work, and just doesn't work. The one that really gets me is the usage of the E85 concept. Almost everyone knows that alcohol doesn't have the BTU range as does gasoline. Thus, you do the mix and your mileage deceases, yet so does the price at the pump (Phil - did you use E85 to get that low of price per gallon?)

There is this other device that also works real good, but has nothing to do with additives in the fuel, but removes the unburnt hydrocarbons in the recirc.gas that is returned into the carburetor, or intake plenum via the PVC valve.

-Monte
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 11-15-2007, 07:41 PM:
 
I believe one of the problems with alternative fuels for gas type engines is the CO2 emissions assoicated with the fuel, both making it and consumming it. CO2 being a problem in the greenhouse gas thing. The problem isn't just in the renewable fuel but a process that doesn't lead to other problems.

Steve
 
Posted by Mike Sellars (Member # 4042) on 11-15-2007, 07:58 PM:
 
I paid $2.87 per gal of regular yesterday.

Mike
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-29-2008, 07:17 PM:
 
Considering gasoline prices are at new all-time highs, it's probably a good occasion to bump this thread.

Prices for 87 octane gasoline around this part of Oklahoma is running $3.54 per gallon. Diesel is ranging between $3.89 and $4.09 per gallon.

I spent $75 putting 21 gallons of gas in my pickup this afternoon. On the bright side, I haven't bought gasoline since late March. Been consolidating those trips and pedaling the bicycle for some short trips and commuting when it's been warm and sunny enough to do so.
 
Posted by Kenneth Wuepper (Member # 1174) on 04-29-2008, 07:51 PM:
 
Gasoline here today is $3.75/gal.

KEN
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 04-29-2008, 07:58 PM:
 
$3.54 is pretty much typical here. Our soda supplier recently bought a new cab over box truck with a gas engine instead of diesel, says fuel consumption specs are just about equal but diesel fuel is $.60 higher and the difference between gas and diesel prices is expected to increase.

Prices have made me change my driving habits considerably, and the pick-up rarely moves anymore.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-29-2008, 08:33 PM:
 
$3.539 here. It was $3.499 yesterday and $3.439 a week ago.

I used to enjoy a little recreational driving, but it's just no fun anymore. I've put less than 3000 miles on my pickup since September.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-29-2008, 10:00 PM:
 
On my way to work this morning: $3.89 regular, $4.19 premium
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 04-29-2008, 10:06 PM:
 
3.409 for 87 octane here. I found this to be an interesting item:

Gasoline/Water Hybrid Conversion
 
Posted by Anslem Rayburn (Member # 1267) on 04-29-2008, 11:19 PM:
 
quote: David Stambaugh
On my way to work this morning: $3.89 regular, $4.19 premium
Does Oregon allow you to pump your own gas yet? I just remember a friend living there a few years back and he was surprised that an attendant had to pump your gas for you. We haven't had attendants pump gas here in 20 years.

Today, regular was $3.49, and the Shell station I went to was sold out of premium gas (which was $3.89)! I don't use premium, but found it crazy that it was sold out.
 
Posted by Tony Bandiera Jr (Member # 2365) on 04-30-2008, 12:32 AM:
 
$3.87 is the cheapest around here today (Tuesday) and it's supposed to jump up again tomorrow....

Anyone else see a huge "Boston Tea Party" type of thing happening in this country soon? [Eek!]
 
Posted by James Westbrook (Member # 3690) on 04-30-2008, 12:47 AM:
 
$3.56 for 86 Octane Regular Unleaded.
I don't know why Lubbock is blessed with 86 Octane fuel...it SEEMS to run okay in my old vehicles.
 
Posted by Jonathan Worthing (Member # 803) on 04-30-2008, 07:09 AM:
 
£5.00 ($10.00) Per gal here now & soon to go up again.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 04-30-2008, 08:14 AM:
 
$3.35 for unleaded in this area. I get another 10 cents a gallon off if we shop at Smith's and spend 25.00 or more so we usually do that.

Keeping this non-political I think prices should stabilize in the near future though as congress is trying to tie the arms trade deal with the Saudi's to pressure them to pump more oil to lower/stabilize the oil market... There is also talk of not putting any more oil into the national reserves as they are almost full again.

Mark
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 04-30-2008, 12:11 PM:
 
Yesterday at my corner Chevron:

$3.61/gal for regular.
$3.73/gal for mid-grade.
$3.83/gal for premium.

Those prices are towards the high end of the range here.

My 50cc scooter burns premium. But it still gets over 100 miles/gallon. When I was commuting 30 miles a day to the airport and back I'd refill after every three round trips - about 7/10 of a gallon in a 1.2 gallon tank. So cost is still pretty cheap at about $4.00/week for gas.

Just have to drive very carefully and defensively. 12,000 miles on the scoot in a year and a half in 'Vegas traffic and I'm not dead yet. No scratches on the bike yet either. What a frickin' life I lead!

The job I just tested for will involve a slightly longer commute. Time to really look for a more highway-capable scoot. I added an M endorsement to my driver license last November in preparation for something with more displacement.

My landlord just set a new personal record on gas fill ups - $60 to fill his Toyota pick up.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-30-2008, 12:16 PM:
 
quote: Anslem Rayburn
Does Oregon allow you to pump your own gas yet?
Hell no! I doubt that will ever happen. Every few years someone in the state legislature introduces a bill to allow self-serv, but it always gets shot down.

Of course if you slap a magnetic sign on the side of your vehicle saying you're with "Acme Industries", you can get a permit to use cardlock stations, where you can pump your own. [Roll Eyes]

The prices I quoted are at the high end for here. You can find Regular for around $3.60 and Premium for under $4.00 if you shop around.

I find the idea of suspending the federal gas tax for the summer to stimulate the economy humorous. It will save the average driver, what, the cost of half a tank of gas?
 
Posted by Clint Koch (Member # 1179) on 04-30-2008, 12:28 PM:
 
San Luis Obispo, CA. (central coast of Cal.)
$4.01
$4.11
$4.21
as of yesterday
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 04-30-2008, 02:30 PM:
 
Louisville area: 3.75 or so.

Costco in Louisville: 3.65, along with 6% rebate on American Express.

Much as it pains me to say this, gas/gold have appreciated at about the same rate which means that the US$ is falling on the world market. Reinforcing this: so much US production is now cheap that it is almost impossible to acquire containers for European/UK shipments. We've had to use air. The dollar is cheap. Louis
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 04-30-2008, 10:04 PM:
 
$3.59 at home in PA for reg. unleaded, $4.75 diesel.

Somewhat cheaper in Jersey.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 04-30-2008, 10:09 PM:
 
quote: Tim Reed
Somewhat cheaper in Jersey.
Where they tend to pump the gas for you (full-serve)...so go figure.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-30-2008, 10:12 PM:
 
The high gas prices make me feel like I'm paying cab fare while driving my own vehicle.
 
Posted by Tim Asten (Member # 4051) on 05-01-2008, 05:17 AM:
 
If you live in the US count yourselves lucky. I paid £1.10 a litre (nearly $10 a gallon) yesterday for regular 95 octane unleaded. Of that, the goverment takes nearly 80% in tax, and - just to cheer us up - by the time you have filled up your car , Shell and BP have made over £150,000 ($300,000) in profit. [Eek!] . Tim
 
Posted by Joshua Waaland (Member # 287) on 05-01-2008, 06:00 AM:
 
It seems like the consumer is getting the short end of the stick from every direction.

I went to buy ice cream last week and got my wife's favorite flavor and my favorite flavor of the same brand. I got in the checkout line and realized mine was less than hers. I didn't want to get out of line so I bought it. When I checked the receipt at home they both cost the same amount. I realized they must have reduced the sizes and I got one of the first ones. I e-mailed the company a nasty letter (Edy's in the east and Dreyer's in the west). I got a reply the next day from the CEO himself. Yeah, a 6,000 person, 2 billion dollar a year company and the CEO himself e-mailed me. Now that's service!

I guess they decided that people would not want to pay higher prices so they reduced the sizes because their costs went up. I told him I would rather have had the prices go up than feel like they were being sneaky and giving me less for the same amount.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-01-2008, 10:38 AM:
 
quote: Tim Asten
If you live in the US count yourselves lucky.
People in most parts of the United Kingdom have alternatives to driving. Much of the UK is canvassed by rail and bus lines. I wish I could hop on a high speed commuter train to Oklahoma City or Dallas.

There are few regions in the US where one can use mass transit exclusively to travel short and medium distances. Most places in this country give you only one choice: hop in your vehicle and drive.
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 05-01-2008, 11:49 AM:
 
Gas price here in San Francisco at the stations near my house at the west end of The City near the ocean is $4.03. But I have seen it as high as $4.10-$4.12 downtown near some of the bridge and freeway entrances.

Ouch!
 -

Fortunately, I'm within walking or a short bus ride distance of where I work.
 
Posted by James Westbrook (Member # 3690) on 05-01-2008, 11:51 AM:
 
Even towns the size of Lubbock are spread out enough that driving becomes necessary.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-01-2008, 12:42 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
People in most parts of the United Kingdom have alternatives to driving. Much of the UK is canvassed by rail and bus lines. I wish I could hop on a high speed commuter train to Oklahoma City or Dallas.
I think 'many' rather than 'most' would be a fairer way of putting it. A friend once commented that in the cities you can't live with a car (i.e. parking it is almost impossible if you don't have a garage or off-road space attached to your residence), but outside them you can't live without one: which I think sums the situation up elegantly. The public transport within and between the major cities is relatively good, and for many city dwellers using it is probably cheaper than the total cost of owning and running a car. But there are many rural villages or even market towns which have one or two buses a day to or from the nearest major conurbation at most. If you work outside that village, you have to have a car - it's that simple. Of course it's these people who have been hit the hardest by the fuel price rises recently.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-01-2008, 02:56 PM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
But there are many rural villages or even market towns which have one or two buses a day to or from the nearest major conurbation at most. If you work outside that village, you have to have a car - it's that simple. Of course it's these people who have been hit the hardest by the fuel price rises recently.
A few years ago I was looking at a bus timetable, I think it was for either Devon or Cornwall. There was one route which operated just once per month, sonething like the first Tuesday of each month, one bus in each direction. Most of the places on this route were also served by other buses, but I managed to find one village which seemed to have no other service. I'd hate to just miss the bus if I lived there.

There is also an infamous railway line in England, near Manchester, which used to have a proper service, but something like fifteen or twenty years ago almost all of the service was diverted onto a different line. The original route is retained for occasional diversions during engineering works, I don't think there's any freight on it now. Other than that the only service is one train per week, in one direction only; there's no service at all in the opposite direction. There are two intermediate stations on this line, Reddish South and Denton, which are served by no other trains. Now, this isn't a transport service, it's a farce. Either there's a need for a train service in this area, in which case a proper one should be run, or there isn't, in which case the line should be closed. I've no idea which is the case, I've never been there.

This is so ridiculous that the line has become quite infamous; the journey is only a few km, but people actually travel from all over the Country just for the novelty of riding on this line.

It's much easier to operate a good public transport service where there is a high density of population, and almost impossible to operate one where the population density is very low. I suspect that the average population density is quite a bit higher than it is in the US. Of course, in major cities, say London and New York, things are very similar.

There is another factor which I think can swing the advantage heavily in favour of the car, and that is the addition of one or more babies or small children; something which doesn't apply in my case. Getting on and off buses with a single baby in a buggy is a struggle, I've never done it myself but I've seen plenty of others doing it. By the time that gets up to about three children life is getting very difficult indeed, and the there's all the maintenance kit that you need to carry around for the young ones.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-01-2008, 04:05 PM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
There is also an infamous railway line in England, near Manchester, which used to have a proper service, but something like fifteen or twenty years ago almost all of the service was diverted onto a different line.
Another equally infamous example is the station at Durham/Tees Valley (formerly called just Teesside) Airport. Apparently the station was put there in the '70s when plans existed to build a new terminal building right next to it. This never happened, and the existing terminal building is about a mile away (the station is at one end of the runway, the terminal at the other). So it's completely useless for passengers. However, in order to actually close down a station you have to get an act of Parliament and jump through lots of other legal hoops. In order for a station to legally remain open, at least one passenger train has to stop there each week. Network Rail doesn't want the expense and hassle of going through the closure procedure, and so every Saturday morning, one Darlington to Middlesbrough train stops at the airport station. No-one gets on or off, and then the train goes on its way again. Meanwhile, a free bus from Darlington station (on the main line) takes people who actually want to get to the airport without driving there.

quote: Stephen Furley
There is another factor which I think can swing the advantage heavily in favour of the car, and that is the addition of one or more babies or small children; something which doesn't apply in my case.
And also extra adults. I reckon that if one person travels from York to London (for example), the difference between the cost of the petrol and a rail ticket is not much. But if you've got three or four people going, then you're looking at £50 for the petrol or £250 for train tickets.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-01-2008, 09:20 PM:
 
Maybe this is a good thing for those who are close to their work: Park the cars, get on the bicycles, save fuel and do some long awaited excersize pedaling them and we'd prob feel better in the long run.
 
Posted by Joshua Waaland (Member # 287) on 05-01-2008, 11:18 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
There are few regions in the US where one can use mass transit exclusively to travel short and medium distances. Most places in this country give you only one choice: hop in your vehicle and drive.
I just saw something about this on the news last night. They were saying there is only one high speed train in the US. They were talking about the decaying train tracks all over the country and the lack of infrastructure for train travel as an alternative.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-01-2008, 11:30 PM:
 
Passenger train travel is on the rise, but there are huge areas of the country it doesn't serve. Look at amtrak.com for a route map and you'll see what I mean. The high-speed train is the Amtrak Acela which is only in the East, I think. (Could be wrong on that.)

We used to have passenger service thru here, two trains a day but it ended about 25 years ago. There's currently a move afoot to get it restored from Washington state as far as Billings (bringing it to within 100 miles of here...it's a start). East of Billings, passenger trains would have to compete with coal trains...we get about 25 to 35 coal trains thru here every day. It's crazy.

There's plenty of railroad track that's in fine condition, but it's not been kept up to passenger standards...meaning the trains would roll over it just fine, but the ride could be rough. BNSF ran an Employee Appreciation Special (pulled by a steam engine!) through here a few years ago...I got to ride from here to Glendive on it. It was lots of fun, but there were some definite rough patches.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-02-2008, 12:35 AM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
And also extra adults. I reckon that if one person travels from York to London (for example), the difference between the cost of the petrol and a rail ticket is not much. But if you've got three or four people going, then you're looking at £50 for the petrol or £250 for train tickets.
It's rather different with adults, where it's normally just an economic issue; you get a large 'quantity discount' when you transport several people by car. With babies and young children they will probably go free, or at low cost, but you've got the bother of getting them, plus buggies, supplies of nappies, feeding equipment, toys etc. onto and off buses or trains, up and down footbridge stairs while trying to make sure that those old enough to walk don't wander off on their own. Adults, except in certain cases of disability, can generally get themselves, along with any luggage, shopping etc. on and off.

quote: Mike Blakesley
The high-speed train is the Amtrak Acela which is only in the East, I think. (Could be wrong on that.)
I believe there are plans for a high speed line in CA, but the Acela is only Boston-Washington D.C. I've seen it at Newark, but never been on it. It generally seems to be carrying a fair number of people when I've seen it, maybe three quarters full, but it's expensive. and not very fast; there's only a small part of the journey where it runs at its maximum speed.

'High speed rail' these days generally means a top speed of around 300km/h, about 186 mph, that's the speed of the TGV in France, the recently opened high speed line to the Channel Tunnel in the UK and, I think, the Japanese trains. There are plans to go faster than this in both China and Spain, and probably elsewhere. However, running at these speeds generally means building a new line from scratch rather than upgrading an existing one, and is very expensive. If you're not going to do this then you don't get much benefit from a train like the Acela, because it's running well below its maximum speed for most of the time. I think it reaches 150mph, but only for a small part of the journey, somewhere between New York and Boston. If you're not going to build a high speed line, then you generally get more benefit by running slower speed conventional trains, maybe 100 or 125 mph, but easing the worst of the speed restrictions along the route. Strengthening or reconstructing a weak bridge to remove a 20mph limit, or putting in a few extra loops to allow passenger trains to pass slower freight ones can be done at relatively low cost, and achieve a greater benefit than running trains like the Acels, but running them at well below their maimum speed for most of the time.
 
Posted by Scott Jentsch (Member # 1681) on 05-02-2008, 12:17 PM:
 
It amazes me that we are so poor when it comes to mass transit in the U.S. My brother came back from Europe 20 years ago on a backpacking trip, and he was bragging about how easy it was to get around Switzerland, Germany, etc. by train. We're not any closer to improving mass transit now in many areas than we were then!

The Wisconsin DOT is looking at spending $1.9 billion on expanding I-94 south of Milwaukee to eight lanes from the current six. Not a single penny is devoted to bolstering mass transit so that they won't be having to add even more lanes 10-20 years from now.

We have an Amtrak line that goes from downtown Milwaukee to downtown Chicago. I've taken it a few times, as well as the Metra commuter rail line that comes from Chicago and ends in Kenosha. Getting to downtown Chicago isn't much faster (the train takes 1 hour 29 mins and Google Maps shows the trip to be 1 hour 45 mins in good traffic, which is hit-and-miss), but it's a lot less stressful, and you don't have to deal with parking once you're there. The $21 fare is a little steep, but I think it's worth it.

The Amtrak train could go faster, but not on the rails they are currently using. They are freight rails and not suitable for higher speeds.

I would have to think that even if just a miniscule portion of that $1.9 billion were used to improve that line and encouraging people to use it for commuting and travel, maybe we wouldn't need those extra lanes after all.

Cities that have efficient, safe, and convenient methods of public transportation are very fortunate.
 
Posted by Derrick Huggins (Member # 4670) on 05-02-2008, 12:21 PM:
 
we are about at 3.80 for reg 3.90 for mid and 4.10 for 93 octane.
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 05-02-2008, 02:24 PM:
 
I filled up my teeny VW Golf yesterday at $3.99 /gal for low grade 87 octane. The 13 gallons for my 14 gallon tank cost me about $52.00 --- FOR A VW GOLF. [Eek!]

I'm sad now that when gas was $0.89 a gallon I was too poor to ever fill up the tank. I only ever put $5.00 at a time in it. Oh what I'd give to fill up my car for $11.50.

To think that by 2010 we'll be paying $5.00 -- it'll be no wonder that people stop taking road trips.
 
Posted by William T. Parr (Member # 677) on 05-02-2008, 04:10 PM:
 
Around Austin I ve seen $3.48 for regular, $3.62 for mid and $$3.80 for premium. Diesel has been $4.15 in most places
 
Posted by Rene Ferron (Member # 4674) on 05-02-2008, 08:19 PM:
 
Here it's 1.276 per Liter so about 4.83$ a gallon if my calculation is correct. That is for regular.
 
Posted by Joshua Waaland (Member # 287) on 05-03-2008, 08:53 AM:
 
quote: Scott Jentsch
I would have to think that even if just a miniscule portion of that $1.9 billion were used to improve that line and encouraging people to use it for commuting and travel, maybe we wouldn't need those extra lanes after all.
Anyone remember the early 90's movie Singles? This was what the main character was trying to tell the city officials in the movie. He had come up with a mass transit train idea and they shot it down saying people loved their cars too much. Fast forward 15 years to now and that same plot may not work in the film. With gas prices so high many people would opt for a train rather than their cars especially when you can leave home for work later because there is no traffic to contend with.
 
Posted by Paul Turner (Member # 832) on 05-03-2008, 04:30 PM:
 
Is anyone running a diesel engine on waste vegetable oil? I did a search before posting this but may have missed previous posts, so pardon me if it's been covered. There is a lot of noise about how biofuels are going to starve the planet. However, waste vegetable oil is in a bin behind every restaurant. It doesn't eliminate the need for regular diesel, but on my last ten gallons of diesel, I got almost 900 miles. If you're into dumpster diving with a pump, it costs about 2 hours per 20 gallons on a good night. I can also buy unfiltered used oil at $1 a gallon and oil filtered to 2 mics at $2 a gallon. The technology is old and reliable and a self-installed kit is about $1500.

The downsides:
--Nothing is free. How much is your time worth? In actuality, it usually just doubles your mileage with some work when you factor in filters and the need to change out old fuel lines.
--Certain engines will go thru injector pumps faster. (Fords eat about one a year on vege, whereas a Mercedes will go 200k on the same injector).
--Lower power. You feel it on hills, but cruising along at 80mph, it's great.
--It's messy. You need to have a place to filter it where you won't mind vege oil all over the place. The good news is when you do spill it, hit it with Simple Green and hose it off.

Even with 25 people running waste vegetable oil cars/trucks in our town of 55k, there is more than enough oil to go around. Some of you may be using fryers in your theaters so you can move your old oil into your fuel tank.

I have fun with it. As handy as theater people have to be, this seems like a no-brainer for some of you.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-03-2008, 06:14 PM:
 
Gas dropped 2 cents a gallon from $3.359 to $3.339 here in Bountiful at Smiths. $67.00 to fill the Hummer but thats 2 weeks worth of to and from work for my wife.

Mark
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 05-03-2008, 11:08 PM:
 
That's really cool, Paul! [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 05-04-2008, 11:39 AM:
 
Regular is running around $3.60 here in God's Country.

I heard my FIRST bitching gas buyer at the pumps yesterday. He was all but screaming about how the prices are killing him. All 18 pump islands were in use, and all people noticed the yelling.

I have stopped driving my 1985 Olds Toronado, and my 1983 Ford truck with its large V8 engine. (INSERT: Phil Hill of Cootville has SEEN this truck!!!)

I'm now driving my 4-cylinder old Mercedes 190E. It gets good mileage.

On diesel being so high, Diesel fuel is not as difficult to refine as gasoline is. So, WHY is it so much more expensive? It's $4.30 here. My local trucker friends are being slammed with costs. One trucker friend has parked his rig for now. He cant afford to run the thing.
 
Posted by Richard May (Member # 2627) on 05-04-2008, 12:54 PM:
 
Wow. The price of regular here today just hit $3.97. $4.27 for premium. Last week regular was $3.59. Let's hear it for the oil companies. [fu]
 
Posted by Mark Hajducki (Member # 1732) on 05-04-2008, 06:09 PM:
 
(GBP) £1.059 / litre which works out as (USD) 7.90$ / US gallon.

It doesn't help that the Scotland's only refinery, and a pipeline supplying 1/3 of the UK's oil, was shutdown for 48 hours due to industrial action.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-06-2008, 01:59 AM:
 
Still cheaper there than here. £1.09 is about the lowest you can now find in York or Leeds. I was in London over the weekend, where £1.12 appears to be about the norm for standard unleaded.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-06-2008, 02:11 AM:
 
quote: Mark Hajducki
was shutdown for 48 hours due to industrial action.

Say what? Are you referring to sabatoge?
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-06-2008, 02:45 AM:
 
No Mark. There was a strike by refinery workers; can't just leave a refinery to run on its own, so it had to be shut down, along with a pipeline serving it, for the duration.
 
Posted by Michael Moore (Member # 3867) on 05-06-2008, 08:17 AM:
 
Gas in Delaware today is about 3.58 but has been in the mid 3.50s for about a month now. I ride a scooter to work, and I get about 100 miles to the gallon. it holds about 1.5 gallons. so I'm good for now, I have been transitioning over to my bicycle two days out of the week I plan by the end of summer to be on the bike about 3 to 4 days out of the week (weather permitting).

Mike
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-07-2008, 02:07 PM:
 
Today gasoline here in Lawton rose by 10¢ to $3.59 for 87 octane.

In other news today, U.S. worker productivity rose by a greater than expected rate. Apparently Americans are working their asses off trying to pay those bills. In response to that improved worker productivity, the price of oil rose beyond $123 per barrel.
[Mad]

I guess once enough Americans get their stimulus checks in the mail the oil speculators will use that as another excuse to raise the prices even more.

The bastards are figuring out new ways to get more inches of that fire poker up everyone's ass before they break off the handle.
 
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 05-07-2008, 02:15 PM:
 
Yesterday price of regular gas was $3.49. Today it was $3.75. .26 cent jump in one day. I think the poker is already up our ass with barely any handle left to break off.
 
Posted by Drew Daniluck (Member # 4678) on 05-07-2008, 03:00 PM:
 
Prices keep climbing every week here...
$3.71 Regular
$3.86 Mid Grade
$3.99 Premium

Not good for most residents here because a great majority communte to DC on a daily basis, about 35-45 miles one way...
 
Posted by Barry Floyd (Member # 385) on 05-07-2008, 03:07 PM:
 
We were at $3.49 a gallon when I went and filled up during lunch. I work only 4 miles from the house, so commuting isn't that big of a deal for me.

At the local commuter rail station down the street from my office, the parking lot that is usually always empty is now almost completley full. It seems that alot more folks are taking the train to work in Nashville than driving the 30-40 miles one way twice a day.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-07-2008, 09:55 PM:
 
..kinda sad when fuel is more expensive than a gallon of milk ...
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-08-2008, 05:52 AM:
 
Yeah, it is sader when people pay more for water by the gallon though! Christ, at the ballpark...it is going for $4.00 for 20Oz. What is it going for in theatres?

There can be no doubt that fuel prices though are going to hurt all businesses like theatres where there are cheaper alternatives to going out. People only make but so much money in a given year (and it seems to be less and less each year...not a good trend) and movies, particularly in theatres, is something one can do without to help make ones financial situation work or work better.

Steve
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 05-08-2008, 09:14 AM:
 
Just wondering when England will read the following head line,
No one went to work today,they could`nt afford the fuel.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 05-08-2008, 09:55 AM:
 
Our half liter bottle of water is $2.00. Deerpark brand
 
Posted by Drew Daniluck (Member # 4678) on 05-08-2008, 01:06 PM:
 
My theatre IS selling water that cost more than gas... We have 1 liters for $4.25 and 20oz for $3.75. And people buy it...
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 05-08-2008, 04:15 PM:
 
The one thing that irritates me when I see reporters saying things like: people pay more for a gallon milk, bottled water, ink, or other fluids; I don't use 12-16 gallons of of the stuff a week like I do gasoline.

[ 05-08-2008, 06:54 PM: Message edited by: Jeremy Weigel ]
 
Posted by Galen Murphy-Fahlgren (Member # 4535) on 05-08-2008, 04:27 PM:
 
I bet you use way more water in a week than gasoline, unless you shower in gas! Kidding aside, we sell bottled water at the theater for almost $3! And people frequently leave them half full in the cupholders. I wish I had that kind of disposable income.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-09-2008, 02:10 PM:
 
I don't know anyone who takes a shower in bottled water. Honestly, I see absolutely no logic in buying bottled water. No safety regulations exist to control it and some tests on TV shows like 20/20 have shown it to be more dirty and contaminated than ordinary tap water in many areas of the nation.

If you really want truly pure water, buy distilled water. All the impurities are removed.

Back to gasoline and oil...

...oil prices hit a new record today. They passed the $126 per barrel mark.

Some analysts are saying $150 and $200 per barrel oil is now possible. Soaring fuel and food prices are beginning to slow down economies around the world. Some investors may be sensing a correction on the way. Exxon|Mobil shares lost 1% and led a number of energy stocks lower in trading today.
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 05-09-2008, 03:57 PM:
 
Just paid $4.20 here for regular. The pumps also still 'auto-shutoff' at $75, which leaves me only 3/4 full. I have to re-swipe the credit card to keep going.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 05-09-2008, 05:04 PM:
 
I am now paying $3.85 a gallon for premium gas and by summer, prices here in Honolulu should exceed $4.00. Prices on Maui is already over that amount and still going up. Thank God, Honolulu has one of the best transportation system in the country and I use it a lot with my $30.00 a year senior citizen bus pass. I now use my car only when I go out on assignments and ride the bus when I visit my 89 year old mother everyday at her nursing home and my three times a week visit to my color lab in Honolulu. Estimated amount I have saved by riding the bus is a little over a hundred dollars a month.

-Claude
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-09-2008, 05:04 PM:
 
Still a relative bargain here...it just went up a nickel to $3.589.
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 05-11-2008, 09:50 PM:
 
quote: Paul Turner
Is anyone running a diesel engine on waste vegetable oil?
Several weeks ago I saw a story on the TV news about a guy here in Northern California who was doing this. Seemed like a good idea at the time.

The other day, I saw a "follow-up" story on the same guy.
Apparantly, ever since he went public and appeared on TV, his life has become a living hell.

> The state & feds have sent him a bill for not paying road taxes, which are normally paid when you buy gasoline. He can appeal the amount, but he must provide documentation proving how many miles he's driven. He was told that failure to pay could result in prosecution for tax evasion.

> The state said that becuase he is filtering the oil at home and then burning it in a motor vehicle, he is in effect operating a refinery without the required permits.

But wait- there's more!
> They also said that it's illegal to drive around picking up waste vegetable oil from restaurants, etc without having some sort of "waste oil transport" permit. To continue to do this, he must obtain a permit as well as get about a million dollars of insurance in case he spills any and it needs "hazardous waste clean-up"

>The California air quality board said that he also needs to have his mixture "certified" by them (at a cost of several thousand dollars for analysis) or it's illegal to burn it in a motor vehicle.

I'm not making this up!

Don'tcha just love bureaucracies?

[ 05-12-2008, 01:42 AM: Message edited by: Adam Martin ]
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-12-2008, 12:21 AM:
 
Is this for real, or just another money grabbing fad that is now surfacing due to the fuel situation around the world?
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-12-2008, 07:51 AM:
 
I personally know of at least several folks doing what the guy in CA is doing. However, the best route to go is still to convert your car to burn Natural Gas. It's less than .70 cents a gallon here in Utah and there are literally hundreds of cars here on the road including all of SLC's "City Cars and Trucks" and all the Busses. Conversions at loocal places cost about 3 grand which is quickly off set by the low cost of CNG here in this state. There are over 40 fill places between Rock Springs, WY. and St. George, UT plus many more scattered about so filling up is a breeze. Honda is offering several of its models with factory dorect gas conversions. Can't find a Natural Gas fill point... just flip the switch on your dash to run on gasoline till the next CNG fill point.

I paid 3.439 a gallon here at Smiths yesterday....
 
Posted by Scott Jentsch (Member # 1681) on 05-12-2008, 10:39 AM:
 
It's up to $3.85 at the cheapest and $3.95 - $4.00 at the highest for 87 octane around here.

It's a really lousy time to be a boat salesman; my neighbors with boats are considering whether to even get them wet this summer.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-12-2008, 04:07 PM:
 
quote: Claude S. Ayakawa
I am now paying $3.85 a gallon for premium gas and by summer, prices here in Honolulu should exceed $4.00.
Interesting that prices in Hawaii are the same as some places on the US mainland. I'd have thought that the cost of shipping the stuff out into the middle of the Pacific from distribution points on the mainland would instantly whack a significant amount on the retail price. Is it subsidised in any way?

A few years ago I went on holiday to the Outer Hebrides (a group of islands about 50 miles off the west coast of Scotland). I'd been forewarned to fill the tank up to the gunwhales before driving onto the ferry, and was glad I did. I can't remember what the actual price was now, but it was a clear third higher than filling up on the mainland. About the only consolation for the locals is that distances on the islands are tiny compared to the amount of driving a typical mainland driver does, and so they don't need to buy that much. Incidentally, those islands were full of rusty old cars which had been abandoned by the roadside. The salty air out there eats car bodies very quickly, and once the cars become unroadworthy, the cost of shipping them back to the mainland to scrap is such that hardly anyone is willing to pay it.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-12-2008, 05:23 PM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
....the best route to go is still to convert your car to burn Natural Gas...
Granted, it is the best way to go, but with N/G conversions like this, isn't the tank supposed to be externally mounted on or at the end the vehicle?

I can see it working great for pickups and trucks due to the tank being placed in the bed, but for cars.......???

Nampa is at $3.599 and Boise is at $3.579 .. SLC gas has always been cheaper ... Back in 1970, one can find gas in SLC for $.229/gallon while us folks up in E. Idaho were paying $.289 for the same stuff - which was good ol' lowlead regular and 93 octane premium was $.319 for those mega muscle machines.

Kinda sickening, aint it??

-Monte
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-19-2008, 03:03 AM:
 
Wouldn't be grand if we could go back to these Gas Prices ?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-19-2008, 11:43 AM:
 
Hell, it wouldn't even be so bad to go back to how prices were just 3 or 4 years ago.

I have lots of gasoline price changer sign sketches for Love's Country Stores, EZ-GO and a couple others. For years I've had the habit of inserting then-current gasoline prices on the drawings.

At this time 3 years ago, people in Lawton were paying $2.19 per gallon for 87 octane. 4 years ago the price was $1.75 per gallon. In 2001 we were paying $1.27 per gallon.

This morning our prices jumped from $3.64 per gallon to $3.79 per gallon. I know I'm not making 3 times as much money as I was in 2001.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 05-19-2008, 12:34 PM:
 
Ours just jumped too. Yesterday at the corner Chevron:

$3.69/gal Regular
$3.79/gal Mid-Test
$3.89/gal Premium

For about the last month or so we've actually been cheaper than SoCal. Normally 'Vegas prices tend to be higher than SoCal's.

Cost me $2.75 to top off the scooter yesterday. Damn!
 
Posted by Rene Ferron (Member # 4674) on 05-19-2008, 01:02 PM:
 
Here the gas is at 1.302 per Liter. (Canada)

4.93$/ US Gallon for Regular.

[fu] [fu] The gas company !
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-19-2008, 01:36 PM:
 
We'll all be on bicycles and scooters before long.

Or maybe we'll just be hoofing it. Should be interesting to see what it will cost to heat a home later on this fall and winter. Sell some possessions to pay the bill.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 05-19-2008, 01:55 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
This morning our prices jumped from $3.64 per gallon to $3.79 per gallon. I know I'm not making 3 times as much money as I was in 2001.
I know the point you are making but you shouldn't have to make 3x the income to offset a 3x increase in gas. If your gas spending was 10% of your spending (when it was 1/3 the price), if you are still spending the same on everything else gas will now be 25% of your spending and your total spending is now 20% higher. Theoretically you would need to increase your income 20% to offset this assuming you were spending everything you earned before. If you were saving before, you now are saving less.

On that HHO modification, exactly how does it increase efficiency? You are using engine power to release the hydrogen from the water. Are they saying that adding Hydrogen Gas to the combustion chamber will increase the burn efficiency of the regular fuel? If it really does add that much efficiency, I'm surprised the automakers don't offer this as a production item (as it will raise their CAFE calculation without very much cost).
 
Posted by Michael Moore (Member # 3867) on 05-19-2008, 02:06 PM:
 
Gas this morning was $3.77, this afternoon it is up to $3.79
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-19-2008, 02:14 PM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
I know the point you are making but you shouldn't have to make 3x the income to offset a 3x increase in gas. If your gas spending was 10% of your spending (when it was 1/3 the price), if you are still spending the same on everything else gas will now be 25% of your spending and your total spending is now 20% higher.
No one is paying the same for everything else.

The price of food, clothing, utilities and many other things is quite a bit higher. The high cost of fuel is affecting that. So even if you stop driving completely and just walk or pedal a bike to work, you're still going to see the price on a lot of ordinary things continue to rise while your earnings strength continues to diminish. The only thing going down at all in price is property values in many areas of the country.

My water bill is nearly double what it was just a few years ago. My natural gas bill is double what it used to be. The inflation rate for lots of basic necessities -things those economists conveniently exclude from their fake inflation figures. The "core" CPI figure is a rose-colored glasses view. I have coworkers who are paying over $400 per month on gasoline.

Next thing, the math is what it is. Gasoline costs 3 times what it did just a few years ago. Middle class and lower income have been dealing with stagnant pay levels. The only thing skewing average income levels higher at all is by income growth in the top tier brackets.

These price hikes are no different than tax hikes. I view them with the same level of disdain. It's impossible to tax the public to prosperity. Big business can't price gouge the public to prosperity either.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 05-19-2008, 02:32 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
These price hikes are no different than tax hikes. I view them with the same level of disdain. It's impossible to tax the public to prosperity. Big business can't price gouge the public to prosperity either.
You hit the nail on the head here. The issue is how to solve the oil price issue. The problem is that even though there are many oil companies, the oil industry operates like a monopoly. It doesn't matter who pumps the oil out of the ground, the price is the same. It's kind of the same with farming except with food there isn't the fear that it will run out one day so the prices don't get artificially high (except when corn is used to make fuel but that is another discussion).

The other problem with oil is that so much of it comes from other countries and they control the price to an extent by controlling output.

Here's my suggestion to solve the issue:

Immediately build as many nuclear power plants as possible with a goal of producing at least 70% of electricity via nuclear power (like France, one of the few things I think they do right).

In the SHORT TERM:
1) Open up ANWR and off shore US for oil exploration and drilling to add supply to the market and take away some foreign dependance.
2) Since generating more electricity with nuclear will cause lower need for coal, reform coal into gasoline to again add gasoline supply to the market that is domestically produced.

For the longer term, intensify research (prodded with grants and tax credits) to find a VIABLE alternative motor fuel. Viable means that it doesn't take fossil fuel input to make (or if it does the energy contained in the fuel must be many times more than the fossil fuel energy that it took to produce it), enough can be made to actually fuel all of the vehicles at some point (which corn based ethanol can't do) and that it doesn't take away food crop land to create.

The problem with my solution is that the environmentalists will try to stop the nuclear power portion and the short term portion of my solution. They will support my long term solution but since it will take years to get to the goal the short term prices will just keep rising.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-19-2008, 03:07 PM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
Since generating more electricity with nuclear will cause lower need for coal, reform coal into gasoline to again add gasoline supply to the market that is domestically produced.

Well, Neucs still pollute too on such a massive scale that few can comprehend it. And it takes gobs of coal to make just one gallon of gasoline. The coal thing is not practical on a larage scale although they say that Oil Shale refining might start up again because technology has advanced suffuciently to make it practical. Actually Neucs are not very practical until they come up with a way to refine or re-use the waste by-products. The cheap alternative is already here and has been around as long as coal and oil... it's Natural Gas. Less than .70 a gallon in Utah!

Mark
 
Posted by Justin Hamaker (Member # 2165) on 05-19-2008, 11:57 PM:
 
Depending on where you go, the price of regular is $3.89 - $3.99. If the Shell station was still around, it would probably be about $4.10.
 
Posted by Rachel Craven (Member # 1016) on 05-20-2008, 12:06 AM:
 
I'm actually down in Pensacola FL at the moment where we got gas today for $3.77, which is about average.

I'm here for a theater interview. =)
 
Posted by Dick Vaughan (Member # 540) on 05-20-2008, 02:13 AM:
 
Well things will only get worse [Frown]

They are talking about a 5 pence (10 cents US) a litre price rise by the end of the week according to this BBC online article.

Fuel prices 'keep cars off road'

Motorists have been hit by petrol and diesel price rises this year
High prices of petrol and diesel are making UK drivers think twice about travelling by car, a survey suggests.

The AA polled 17,500 members, and found 27% had cut back on other areas of spending, 16% had decided to travel less by car, and 21% had done both.

Petrol prices have risen sharply this year, although government figures have only shown car traffic falling 2%.

The Petrol Retailers Association says that average prices could go up as much as 5 pence a litre by the weekend.

"I expect that motorists and diesel users in particular are going to pay more at the pumps in the coming weeks, possibly as soon as the bank holiday, from where they are now," said Ray Holloway, director of the Petrol Retailers Association.

"The simple reason is that the wholesale price of oil sent diesel up 3 pence last week and there's more to come."

Accelerating diesel

The average price of a litre of unleaded petrol in the UK is currently 113.01p while the average diesel price is 124.87p.

That compares with average figures from three months ago of 104.02p for unleaded and 109.30p for diesel.

Diesel prices have gone up particularly fast as a result of a lack of refining capacity.

Official figures from the Department for Transport showed that car traffic had fallen by 2% in the first three months of 2008 compared with the same period of 2007.

Fuel prices have accelerated as a result of the rising price of oil, which set a record high near $128 a barrel on Friday
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 05-20-2008, 03:09 AM:
 
Scariest one found at the moment is diesel @ £1.28 ltr
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-20-2008, 05:22 AM:
 
I paid $1.79AUD for diesel this morning. Last week it was $1.59.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-20-2008, 08:28 AM:
 
My local station (Boroughbridge Road, York) shot up from 109.9p to 113.9p just over the weekend! [Eek!]
 
Posted by Michael Moore (Member # 3867) on 05-20-2008, 08:33 AM:
 
quote: Alan Plester
Scariest one found at the moment is diesel @ £1.28 ltr
Diesel in my home town of Dover Delaware is running this morning about $4.85/gal that's roughly about $1.30 or so per ltr.

My scooter is costing me about $5.25 to fill up and that will last me about 3 weeks... I don't have a far commute to work, about 3 miles booth ways.

Mike
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-21-2008, 02:09 PM:
 
Today, while executives of major oil companies were testifying before congress about high oil prices, the price of crude oil broke past $132 per barrel. The price has gone up about $5 per barrel in just the last 24 hours.

Gas prices here have pulled back 4 cents from Monday's levels, down to $3.75 per gallon. I have the feeling that's just the "back swing" ahead of the consumer being clubbed in the nuts with a 9 iron.

I'd like to drive up to Moore, OK to check out that new Warren Theater and the new Indy IV movie. But $50 for fuel alone on merely a 200 mile round trip is encouraging me not to bother with the trip at all.
 
Posted by Ben Wales (Member # 92) on 05-21-2008, 02:58 PM:
 
The average Diesel price in my area is £1.24 a Litre and I have heard that it has reached £1.34 in parts of Devon.

We have been told that prices are likely to raise to £1.50 a litre by September.

At least in France they protest, wheile we just moan about it in the UK and our Gordon rakes in the Tax!.

Today French Fisherman blockade three major French Ferry ports and caused 10miles of parked Trucks in the UK due to High Fuel prices in France.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-21-2008, 03:55 PM:
 
Went over to Calais between Christmas and the New Year to fill the car up with cheap booze. I normally fill it with cheap petrol, too: but this time found that it was actually slightly more expensive than in Kent. Given that the pound has dropped even more against the euro since then, I wouldn't be surprised if they're now paying significantly more than we are.
 
Posted by Chris Hipp (Member # 1788) on 05-21-2008, 06:01 PM:
 
Eh, let them bid it up, the faster the better.

As much as I would hate to say the oil campanies are not to blame, I have agree that it is the speculators causing the problems, the oil companies are just reaping the rewards.

That bubble will have to burst at some point, might take two months and it might take ten years.

I suppose we can take some satisfaction knowing that these idiots who are buying oil for over $200 a barrel are going to take a lot bigger hit than we are when the bubble does pop.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-21-2008, 06:35 PM:
 
quote: Chris Hipp
I suppose we can take some satisfaction knowing that these idiots who are buying oil for over $200 a barrel are going to take a lot bigger hit than we are when the bubble does pop.
I don't know about that.

The high price of oil is pushing up prices for many other everyday necessities, like food. That's ramping up the misery index for lots of middle class and lower income workers.

Some financial experts (people I see on the Bloomberg channel) are now throwing around the term "demand destruction," saying we're getting dangerously close to that. At some point these conditions are going to cause a lot of people to just go broke. Credit card companies have been releasing some disturbing numbers regarding consumer debt and rising levels of defaults. Others with little money left to spend are just going to stop spending money on anything outside of basic necessities. We're looking at consumer retrenchment. That's a very bad thing considering 70% of our economy is driven by consumer spending.

With oil prices and prices of other things going ever higher at ever faster rates, that may create an equally quick inertia for a downward slide.

Many investors already know the oil market is "frothy" and getting propelled upward by speculative fear and greed. The prices have nothing to do with fundamentals of existing oil supply and demand. The trick for investors and speculators is figuring out just when to sell before the bottom falls out. They just don't want to lose money by selling short.

I think if oil gets well into the $150-$200 per barrel range it will plunge the United States economy into a deep, prolonged recession. Many developed nations and emerging economies depend on America's appetite for imports. With a serious recession in America a lot of that demand will be gone. A great deal of the growth that took place in China, India and other developing nations in recent years was funded by American consumers and businesses. Serious recessions in the US have spawned worldwide downturns in the past.

As to who really gets hurt when the oil bubble pops, I think the average working class folks are going to get hit harder than any wealthy investor. Sure, some investors are going to get hit hard when that bubble bursts. But I don't think they're going to go broke the way a middle class person with little financial cushion can.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-21-2008, 08:33 PM:
 
I listen quite often to Bruce Williams (talk show host, financial advisor) -- he thinks we'll see $6.00 per gallon in the next two years.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-22-2008, 03:56 AM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
he thinks we'll see $6.00 per gallon in the next two years.

...to match the $7.25/hr minimum wage in 2009...
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-22-2008, 05:52 AM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I listen quite often to Bruce Williams (talk show host, financial advisor) -- he thinks we'll see $6.00 per gallon in the next two years.
My prediction is that it will double within 2-3 years, and reach $25 per gallon within ten years. I don't think it will be the end of the world as we know it. People will make less long journeys, they will walk more for short ones, as they used to. We are just going to have to get used to the idea of energy being expensive. There will be more incentive for improved efficiency, We'll see more of waste heat recovery from air conditioning systems and industrial processes, and that sort of thing. Plastics are also going to get a lot more expensive too, and we're going to see a lot more recycling of them, which is really only just starting to happen now.

I also think we will have a lot less of things like strawberries in the middle of winter, as we can get now, as the cost of flying them half way round the world, or growing them under controlled conditions becomes too great, but we never used to have them all year round, and life wasn't too terrible then.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-22-2008, 06:12 AM:
 
My guess on this is somewhere between Stephen's and Bobby's. At the core of the issue is this: are we dealing with a commodity price bubble of a similar sort to the recent house price bubble in the US and Britain (and, more to the point, will it go pop in the same way?), or is the underlying cause of this Peak Oil?

If the former, then I guess we're in for another one of the boom and bust cycles which have characterised developed economies since the Industrial Revolution, with the rapidly developing economies of China and India changing the details and timing to a certain extent.

But if Peak Oil has arrived (and I find OPEC's 'we won't pump more oil' statements a tad suspicious - won't or can't?), then the goalposts have been permanently moved. We'll have to use existing energy sources more efficiently, and develop newer and more renewable ones. During the era of cheap fossil fuels, it simply wasn't cost effective to do the latter - it was far cheaper to pump the energy we needed out of the ground, and then to use it in a relatively inefficient way. If that's no longer the case, I agree with Stephen that there are going to be big changes in all of our lives in the coming years and decades. All that's up for debate is the how and the when.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-22-2008, 06:14 AM:
 
I bought gas in Orem, Utah for 3.529 a gallon yesterday. Normal prices here are around 3.699... go figure...

Mark
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 05-22-2008, 05:41 PM:
 
The expensive station in San Francisco was $4.239 the other day. The more reasonable ones on 19th avenue were $4.039 this morning and usually they're within one or two pennies of the suburban prices so it's not just a big city gouging.

I can't wait for gas to be more than the cost of a movie so customers can stop complaining. I pumped gas a few weeks ago and found it amusing that at $3.75 a gallon the meter kept adding up like the bargain matinee tickets did when I first started in theatres in 1994. [Smile]
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 05-23-2008, 01:35 PM:
 
Anybody's theatre prices (either/both box and conc) taking an increase due to this fuel pricing crisis?

Another question that I have to ask and that is: with the price of fuel nowdays (which is forever increasing day by day..and obviously we're not getting any cost of living increases in our wages due to this situation) - Has this caused any form of re-budgeting your pocketbooks, driving habits, change of vehicles, methods of travel, et.al., so one isn't being hurt too bad with these fuel increases?
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-23-2008, 05:21 PM:
 
Has anyone working in theatres that can only be reached by car (e.g. multiplexes next to a city's outer ring road) noticed a drop-off in trade?

I'd have thought that city centre venues from which most of the customers come either on foot or by public transport would now be in a stronger position than those which can only be visited by car. But there again, if a couple or family is prepared to spend £30-40 on a trip to the pictures and all the incidentals that go with it, an extra 50p for the petrol to get there and back isn't going to be a deal breaker, I guess.
 
Posted by Jean-Marc Toussaint (Member # 4784) on 05-24-2008, 09:15 AM:
 
I know this is no competition, but for the sake of conversation, I made some comparisons with gas price over here (Paris, France)...
It's an average 1.55 euros per liter for the cheap gas.
There are 3.8 liter to a gallon (US).
It means that we pay 5.89 euros (USD 9.28) per gallon.
Food (or gas) for thought. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-24-2008, 09:33 AM:
 
Stephen,

I would highly doubt that gas will hit $25/gallon (in the States). It would shut down this country...which is the sort of thing that wars are made of.

This country is rather spread out and has always pushed the transportation of the day. The very nature of States as individual sovern entities within a common "united" collective is, at the root, how this country runs. Without transportation by road/air...etc in an economical fashion will kill not only the economic infrastructure but the whole way of life. $25/gallon based on current income levels (or even rosy projected income levels 10-years from now), would effectively strand people and kill them.

At $3.00/$4.00 per gallon it is already showing its affect on our economy entertainment businesses have already felt its affects. How many miles does the average American drive in a week? For me, it is in the hundreds, just to get to/from work (not the miles at work, in a company vehicle). Call it 300-miles for me. My vehicle seems to get about 30miles/gallon or about 10-gallons a week. That is $250/week or $13,000/year for gas at $25.00 a gallon. For some, it would be notably more...for some a bit less but either way...rather parallizing. Then again, at those gas rates...most won't be able to go to the theatre so my income to drop to make things even more dire.

In a day when people still talk about the difference of a few pennies over a loaf of bread, the difference of 300-400% in a gallon of gas to get that loaf of bread would seem to finanically kill the shopper (note, the loaf of bread would also go up in price more than pennies since the transporation costs of getting it to market would also go up 300-400%).

Steve
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-24-2008, 09:33 AM:
 
Jean,

I can certainly see that price happenning here too in the near future! The high prices certainly DOESN'T seem to have ruined any other countries economy... in the long run it will actually strengthen ones economy and bring forth much more public transportation that we should have seen happen long long ago.

Mark
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 05-24-2008, 02:09 PM:
 
I believe the US must get more passenger rail systems built and have more bus service running in other areas. Unfortunately this country has a lot of challenges when it comes to mass transit.

The United States can't seem to get a public transportation system built these days without it turning into some corrupted, cost-overrun infected boondoggle. I find it amazing this country had so many passenger rail lines 100 years ago. It would be impossible to provide that level of service today.

Countries in Europe and Asia are better able to get mass transit systems built since their population densities are so much higher. They don't have to build as many miles of track. At the peak of America's rail system, it had over 200,000 miles of track. Now we have the property of a lot of former rail lines being converted into trails and bike paths -if they're not covered up by housing development and other stuff.

Then there's the matter of the "car culture" in the United States. Americans love traveling in their own vehicles wherever they want and do so on their own schedule.

quote: Steve Guttag
I would highly doubt that gas will hit $25/gallon (in the States). It would shut down this country...which is the sort of thing that wars are made of.
I'm a little foggy history, but didn't we have an oil embargo running against the Japanese empire in 1941? Isn't that one of the factors that pushed their military into bombing Pearl Harbor?

If gasoline shot up to $25 per gallon, or even $10 a gallon any time soon it would cause a hell of a lot of political crisis. The US dollar would need a lot of inflation/devaluation along with workers having their pay increased a lot to make up for all that inflation for $10 per gallon or $25 per gallon gasoline to keep from starting wars, causing famine, etc.

One thing I'm holding out hope that will happen is these high prices will force a much more aggressive, faster conversion to cars that run on fuels other than gasoline. American car companies are losing billions of dollars doing business as usual. Airlines are in a state of crisis. Ethanol is a big scam and costly distraction from doing something that will be truly effective in getting this country off the oil tit. Whether we need to be driving electric cars, cars that run on hydrogen fuel cells or whatever, this country seriously needs to get on the ball to converting to that within the next 10 years, if not sooner. Sticking with gasoline is just going to cause this country more and more trouble.
 
Posted by Jean-Marc Toussaint (Member # 4784) on 05-25-2008, 08:49 PM:
 
If you haven't seen it yet, try to grab "Who Killed the Electric Car?" about th elife and death of the Saturn EV1. Quite an enlightning documentary...
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-26-2008, 05:02 AM:
 
I'm not sure that direct comparisons between European and US petrol prices are that helpful, because a much larger proportion of the European retail price is tax (currently 81% for petrol in Britain, against a European average of around 60%). Perversely, this cushions the blow when the price of the actual liquid goes up, because the overall price we pay for it increases a lot less, proportionally.

I dread to think how much a high speed rail link across America (using similar technology to France's TGV and Japan's Shikansen) would cost - the thought reminds me of the scene in The Iron Horse in which President Lincoln signs the railroad bill, sightly nervous of what a huge project it represented. If the money could be found, I guess it would be possible to build a rail link that could take you from New York to Los Angeles in one long day (15 hours or so). But even the Channel Tunnel rail link (55 miles or so) cost £2 billion here. Multiply the cost of that over 3,000 miles, and the only possible way I can see of making it happen would be to impose European levels of taxation on road fuel. Given that the average American has to travel much longer distances routinely than the average European, that would impose massive hardship.

I'd also be interested to know how the energy input needed to take a TGV-type train across America would compare with that of a 747 or an A380 (which carries around the same number of passengers) making the same trip.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-26-2008, 05:25 AM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
I would highly doubt that gas will hit $25/gallon (in the States). It would shut down this country...which is the sort of thing that wars are made of.
I really do think that sort of price is possible within a ten year timescale. Oil prices will rise and fall, but there is bound to be an overall upward trend, and I think it will be a steep one.

The remaining oil reserves are getting ever more expensive to recover. There is a global market for energy, not just oil, and increasing demand from increasing demand from increasing industrial development in such places as China and India will tend to increase world prices. Much of the world's oil reserves are in politically unstable areas, which makes supply uncertain. Those countries which have oil may wish to keep more of it for their own use rather than exporting it. Governments may increase taxation on fuel to suppress demand, both to extend the life of the remaining reserves, and to reduce pollution. Combine all of those factors, and there is only one way that prices will be going in the longer term.

A $25 per gallon price is not much more than a five-fold increase, and much greater increases than that have certainly happened in the past. We never had a family car, but when we rented one for our weeks holiday I think we paid about 5/- (five Shillings) per imperial gallon (~4.5 litres). At that price it was rather more than a Shilling per litre, and it's now rather more than a pound; something like a 20-fold increase. I'm sure that people 35-40 years ago would have thought that a 20-fold increase was impossible, but it has happened; why is a five-fold increase over the next ten years not possible?

If this happens, it will not shut down the Country. It will certainly change people's lifestyles, but people will learn to live with it. To start with, at those prices they will waste a lot less energy than they do now. At the College where I work I would say we could something like halve our energy costs, though it would take some investment to do so; we are not doing it, even with the new building about to go up, but if energy costs rise this much then we will do so; we won't be able to afford not to. For example, we burn large amounts of gas in six large boilers to heat the place every Winter, but many parts of the building are then so hot as to be unbearable, so we have to open the windows to let the heat out. We have lighting, tens of kW of it, left on for about 16 hours per day, in rooms which are not in use, and which are often lit by bright sunlight anyway. It's not just at work, it's everywhere. We have trains which sit at a terminus for an hour or so with the engines running, and which when they finally depart carry so few passengers that they could be taken by mini-bus, or in some cases by a taxi. We simply won't be able to afford this in future.

quote: Steve Guttag
This country is rather spread out and has always pushed the transportation of the day. The very nature of States as individual sovern entities within a common "united" collective is, at the root, how this country runs. Without transportation by road/air...etc in an economical fashion will kill not only the economic infrastructure but the whole way of life. $25/gallon based on current income levels (or even rosy projected income levels 10-years from now), would effectively strand people and kill them.
You talk about how the Country runs now, but if it can't afford to run that way in the future then it will have to run in some other way, won't it? Let's say a company pays some of its staff to fly, or drive, to a meeting for a few hours, and then drive back again. In the past that was cheap, but in the future it won't be, so we have to ask if it really makes sense to physically transport all of those bodies several hundred miles to the meeting.

If the current way of life is to transport lots of people ad goods huge distances all the time, then the way of life probably will have to change, but I don't think that change has to be a disaster. People will live closer to their work, they will buy more in local shops, they will buy more local products. To fly fruit half way round the World just because it's out of season here doesn't make sense either; I can eat something that is in season. For several decades we saw small local shops being replaced by supermarkets, first by smallish local ones, then by bigger out of town type ones, which were difficult to reach except by car. That is now starting to change, she big chains are now starting to open smaller local stores.

For most of the time that people have lived on this planet they didn't travel great distances, and they didn't use vast amounts of fuel to do so. This is something that really only came about over a period of a few decades; if we could manage without doing it in the past then we can do so again, possibly rather better than we could then since we can communicate via telephones, Internet, etc.

I'm sure we all like to travel from time to time, and I think we will still be able to do so, but not to the extent that we do now.

quote: Steve Guttag
At $3.00/$4.00 per gallon it is already showing its affect on our economy entertainment businesses have already felt its affects. How many miles does the average American drive in a week?
I have no idea, obviously some much more than others. Some will need to travel more than thers due to the nature of their work, etc. However, if the price of fuel rises steeply then they are going to have to either:

1) Pay much more to do so.

2) Travel less.

3) Use more efficient means to travel, e.g. use smaller cars, walk for short journeys, shop more locally.

Or, more likely, some combination of these.

quote: Steve Guttag
For me, it is in the hundreds, just to get to/from work (not the miles at work, in a company vehicle). Call it 300-miles for me. My vehicle seems to get about 30miles/gallon or about 10-gallons a week. That is $250/week or $13,000/year for gas at $25.00 a gallon. For some, it would be notably more...for some a bit less but either way...rather parallizing. Then again, at those gas rates...most won't be able to go to the theatre so my income to drop to make things even more dire.
So what will you do if fuel prices do rise that much, which is something that is completely beyond your control? Will you just crawl into a hole and die, or will you make changes to reduce you energy consumption to what you can afford? If changes have to be made isn't it better to make them gradually rather than to wait until there's a major crisis and then be forced to make them suddenly?

How about this for an idea. People live in somewhat higher density communities, and they have shops, schools, workplaces, cinemas, churches or whatever nearby, like they used to. Unless the weather is bad, or you are carrying something heavy,or are disabled, you probably don't even need to get the car out to get to these places, because they're within walking distance. That's obviously a big country that you live in, but so what? Europe is a big place, but I don't go to France to buy wine (there are some that do), I don't go to huge out-of-town hypermarkets, I buy things from local shops. I don't walk to work, because it is just a bit too far, but other than this, I don't travel much; I sometimes go for several weeks without even getting on a bus, other than to go to work. You seem to be describing a place which developed as it did because transport was cheap; if it becomes unaffordably expensive, as I believe it will, then things will have to change.

quote:
In a day when people still talk about the difference of a few pennies over a loaf of bread, the difference of 300-400% in a gallon of gas to get that loaf of bread would seem to finanically kill the shopper (note, the loaf of bread would also go up in price more than pennies since the transporation costs of getting it to market would also go up 300-400%).

So produce the food more locally; food eaten in Maine doesn't have to be grown in California. Lamb for England doesn't have to come from New Zealand. I'm not suggesting that we all need to become farmers, and grow all our own food at the bottom of the garden, but if we reduce the distances that we transport goods, use more fuel-efficient ways of transporting it, use alternative sources of energy, reduce the excessive packaging which many products have these days, consume a bit less generally and pay slightly more then it doesn't have to be a disaster; it's not the end of the World.
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-26-2008, 06:52 AM:
 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Went over to Calais between Christmas and the New Year to fill the car up with cheap booze.
Must be cheap booze to run your car with it. [Eek!] [Wink]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-26-2008, 07:53 AM:
 
Some of the cheaper stuff you can get from a French hypermarché probably doesn't taste that different to bioethanol... [Razz]

quote: Stephen Furley
Europe is a big place, but I don't go to France to buy wine (there are some that do)
Guilty as charged!

Reduce the taxation on wine here and I might be persuaded to stop doing so. That having been said, it's a shorter distance from Calais to most parts of the UK than many typical intra-UK trips are.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-26-2008, 08:21 AM:
 
Wow Stephen...you don't understand this country at all. I suggest you stop right now as you are trying to use, perhaps, a European model to the US...argueably, a unique country in how it has formed and evolved.

Your example about a 5-fold increase is an example of one you really have not thought out very well. But lets look at it. When gas was say 60-cents a gallon...the minimum wage in this country was about $2.50/hour or about 6 times the price for a gallon of gas. Right now at $4.00 a gallon, minimum wage is still higher than it and slated to be nearly double. At $25.00 a gallon it will more than double the minimum wage here.

Your solutions of greater population densities since it "worked in the past" is also rather nieve. It presumes that we, as a country have not grown. In fact, as a Country, the US has had a "frontier" for most of its life and that has allowed us to expand our population as much and as fast as we did. It is one of the reasons that railroad right of ways were handed out...just to get the country connected. One thing that all of the clowns that whine about more restrictions on immigration seem to forget...we have reached both coasts and the country is already filling up. Immigration needs to be contained (not eliminated) as the country now needs to gradually expand to the increase in population, mot merely take in bodies to develop it.

But back on the denser population theroy. By forcing people closer to metropolitain areas you also have the laws of supply-and-demand at work on the housing situations...which means any reduction in money spent in fuel will be more than made up by landlords or more likely slumlords. After all, land has an inherent limitation of availability and once it is all gone, what incentive is there for a lower price?

Again, what you say just won't and can't work for this country. It defies our whole way of life and existance since it started. It is the sort of thing that wars are made of.

The country will adapt however. You will find that a multitude of things will likely happen...things like Anchorage Alaska will cease to be a debate and any place with the likelihood of oil will be green lighted for drilling. I hope there would be an adjustment back to more rail and less trucking. Trucking is okay from depot to destination but trains are inherently more efficient at moving great distances. Then there are alternative fuels...those we have currently and those currently under development. While no one type may have a huge impact, there is no reason that a combination of types can't be used. I know that for our new house, I fully plan to have not only solar but wind impeller(s) on the roof to catch the energy quite literally floating about. Then there is nuclear...France runs on the stuff. It is a bit like making the deal with the devil...it is a bit bold to make a decision in any present day that will have a 10,000-year life span. But there is no denying that it would cheap/plentiful fuel.

But $25/gallon with today's or even 10-years from today's income levels...it just would not work in this country. Before you come back with your silly prediction...come over here and take a REALLY hard look at this country. And I mean from inside out and don't leave out the rual areas and just imagine the impact of $25/gallon gas on every aspect of it (because the fuel affects moving everything, not just people).

Steve
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-26-2008, 09:26 AM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
But $25/gallon with today's or even 10-years from today's income levels...it just would not work in this country.
But what do you mean by "it just would not work in this country"? If that's what the price was in say ten years time, then you would have to find a way to make it work. To a large extent you cannot control the price of oil; if the price goes up then you have to either pay more, or use less, or both. What you're saying seems to be rather like saying "It can't rain next week, it just wouldn't work in this country" If it's going to rain then it will rain, and there's not a lot you can do about it. You can stay indoors, or put on waterproof clothing, but you can't stop it raining. If the World price of oil goes up then it goes up. You can find ways to use less oil, but you can't stop the price going up.

Also, you seem to feel that the US is different to other places, and I don't understand this. It's a bigger place than England say, but it's made up of smaller areas, states, counties, cities etc. which is not that different to Europe for example, which is made up of countries, counties, cities, etc. One is a single country while the other is a group of countries, but borders between countries are largely artificial, man-made things anyway. Overall, Europe is probably about the same size as the US.

The differences you speak of between the US and Europe for example are really differences in lifestyle, in the way that people have chosen to live, and those choices were based on oil being cheap and plentiful. If oil becomes expensive, as I believe it will, then lifestyles which depend on the use of large quantities of cheap oil will be likely to change. It won't happen overnight, which is why I think we need to be planning for it now, but it will happen. After all, lifestyles which require large amounts of oil are a recent thing; just 100 years ago things were different. Lifestyles have changed greatly in not much more than a lifetime, and I think they will change again.

The US really isn't that different to anywhere else; people have the same basic needs. You seem to feel that a lifestyle using less oil, or using as much, but paying far more for it, is something terrible; I just don't see it that way. We will have to travel a bit less, be less wasteful of energy, not use lots of excessive plastic packaging, etc. Except for wasted energy, cutting down on which isn't going to hurt anybody, I don't think I'm suggesting anything different to the way we lived until quite recently.

If somebody living in New York needs to go to Chicago then they will still do it the same way, probably by air, but that's really no different from going from London to Milan, or Moscow; it's not something that most people would do very often.

Again, I'm suggesting that we modify lifestyles to use less oil; more people living closer to their work, or working from home, better insulation, using more local shops, wearing clothes appropriate to the climate, and therefore using less heating and cooling, using less plastic to make disposable items. I'm not suggesting that we all live in caves, and freeze to death in Winter. We're talking about fairly minor changes in lifestyles, over a considerable period.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-26-2008, 11:42 AM:
 
Oh Stephen...you just don't get it. Okay...take your rain example...that is indeed a nature thing...and no, we don't, yet, have the ability to manipulate that completely...can't even really predict the weather well enough...but lets roll with that....rain is typically a temporary thing, if it lasts too long, you get flooding and any one part of the US might be flooding at any one point in time...while nasty for the people being flooded, it does not bring the whole country down (Check out New Orleans)...what you are talking about is flooding the entire country...it would kill it.

Now lets look at oil or fuel prices...they are man made as is the value of currency. They are definately manipulatable by the same entities that create the value. If the market can't do it by natural means (people using enough less fuel by 100 different means to reduce demand), governments can step in to manipulate it. Again, in the US, you could see expanded drilling to the dismay of the environmentalists, mandated levels of non-oil based energy, regulated the gasoline companies even to the point of turning them into a not-for-profit entity. Heavy political/financial pressure on oil producing countries for lower prices. It could certainly get ugly.

Then you have the fact that as the price of essential commodities become too expensive and scarce, you will get crime and black markets to keep up with the need. It would be worse than prohibition in this country or even the drug wars.

Your example of flying to Moscow versus a NY to Chicago flight is just yet another example of your complete lack of understanding of how this country works. Just start learing about our history and how our laws have evolved with respect to moving about for both pleasure as well as commerce. You can start with the Declaration of the Independence, move the Constitution and continue....again take a long trip over here and check out how life is in all parts of this country and remember, it is all tied together, and always has been.

Steve
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-26-2008, 01:03 PM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
Oh Stephen...you just don't get it.
No, I'm sorry, but I really don't.

quote: Steve Guttag
what you are talking about is flooding the entire country...it would kill it.

No it wouldn't. People would use less energy, they would use it more efficiently, the would make more use of alternative forms of energy which are not economically viable at present, but which would become so it the price of oil were to rise that much.

quote: Steve Guttag
You can start with the Declaration of the Independence, move the Constitution
What do the Declaration of the Independence or the Constitution have to do with the price of oil? Oil, at least petroleum oil wasn't generally even being used then. At that time ships used wind power, and most land transport used horse power, or man power. People started to use oil because the technology was developed to use it, and it started to be produced in quantities which made it readily available, and cheap. Even then, it was far from universal; trains generally burned coal or wood, when electricity became widely available most power stations burned coal. This idea of relying so heavily on oil really is a quite recent thing, and I don't think to rely so heavily on a single source of energy is a good thing.

I have made a prediction about the price of fuel over the next ten years; I may be right or I may be wrong, time will tell. I have also proposed that we make certain fairly minor changes to our lifestyles in order to reduce our consumption of oil. If my prediction turns out to be correct then we will probably be forced to make those changes, we will not be able to afford not to. If my prediction turns out to be incorrect then surely it's still a good idea to try to reduce our consumption of oil. The reduced demand will help to slow the increase in price, will extend the life of the available reserves, will reduce pollution, and will save money. Surely you're not saying that reducing oil consumption is a bad thing, are you?
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-26-2008, 01:12 PM:
 
Stephen...I was giving you the starting points on how this country was founded and how it works and why what you think is just so wrong...it has nothing to do with how oil is used but how America works. You don't understand and lets leave it at that.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 05-26-2008, 02:16 PM:
 
Premium unleaded in Honolulu now cost about $4.09 and regular unleaded is about $3.98 and the price seem to be going up everyday.

Thank God I am a senior citizen and qualify for a Honolulu senior bus pass that cost $30.00 a year. With this bus pass, I have unlimited use of the city's public transportation system and allows me to save a lot of money that I would have spent on gas. Because I am semi retired, I do not go out on too many photographic assignments like I used to do that required the use of my car. All of my commuting everyday to my mother's nursing home and my two times a week trips into Honolulu to pick up and drop off work at my professional color lab is done on a bus and I love it. Honolulu's buses are very comfortable and have a very reliable schedule. I can do a lot of things on a bus such as reading, listening to music or watching a movie on my iPod Touch or catching up on my sleep. Another good thing about using the bus is not having to worry about finding parking and having to pay for it.

If I were to use my car all week instead of the bus, I would have to pay about about $70.00 for gas. The estimated amount I am paying for gas a week now when I am using public transportation is about $20.00 or less.

-Claude
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 05-26-2008, 04:18 PM:
 
It's strange that gas 'only' costs $4.09 in Honolulu. Here (in lower Connecticut) it's about $4.40. Considering that there are large refineries near (in New Jersey) vs. the cost to ship anything out to Hawaii, I thought things would be reversed.

The prices must really be hitting people hard; Although it is the Memorial Day holiday, there were an exceptionally low number of cars on I95 today. I don't think I've ever seen so few for this holiday.
 
Posted by Jonathan M. Crist (Member # 413) on 05-26-2008, 06:01 PM:
 
If I remember correctly around December 2005 Hawaii's state public utility commission imposed a cap on gas prices in Hawaii because gas was getting so expensive there. I believe it is tied to an average of certain major metro areas such as New York City.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 05-26-2008, 07:38 PM:
 
Jonathan, The gas cap law was a trial program for a limited time and it had expired. The state legislature was interested in making it permanent but our governor was luke warm in extending it and nothing was done. Hawaii no longer have a cap on gas.

-Claude
 
Posted by Ron Funderburg (Member # 4561) on 05-29-2008, 02:35 PM:
 
oil company profit on a gallon of gas is 4% while local, state and federal taxes average at 15% what is causing the gas to cost so much? UM well you do the math!
 
Posted by Patrick Dunn (Member # 3333) on 05-29-2008, 11:03 PM:
 
Just below $4 a gallon in Delaware. [Frown]
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 05-30-2008, 12:26 AM:
 
$3.839 here today, up from $3.799 over Memorial Day weekend. I lost a bet on that one, I thought it would stay the same or maybe come down a little after the holiday.
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 05-30-2008, 03:29 PM:
 
I just paid $4.259 to fillup last night. $57.57 on my 14 gallon tank.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 05-30-2008, 03:34 PM:
 
Thought about filling up on the way home from work last night, at 113.9p, then decided against it (long day; wanted to get back). Tonight, when I had no choice, it had jumped to 115.9. That's about half a pint of beer I wasted by not acting quickly enough. Bugger.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-06-2008, 12:59 PM:
 
Gas prices here have held steady for about the last 2 weeks: $3.85 per gallon for 87 octane gasoline and well over $4 per gallon for premium and diesel.

That price for 87 octane fuel could rocket past the $4 per gallon level in the wake of an oil price spike. As of 1:00pm CST, crude oil has gained nearly $10 per barrel just today. The price per barrel rose more than $5 yesterday. Morgan Stanley is predicting oil will trade at $150 per barrel by July 4. Several factors have contributed to this latest spike: a big jump in America's unemployment rate, a candidate for the prime minister's office in Israel talking about military action in Iran, the Treasury Secretary may hold interest rates steady while central banks in Europe raise theirs and further devalue the dollar in the process.
 
Posted by Justin Hamaker (Member # 2165) on 06-06-2008, 01:22 PM:
 
Cheapest price in town right now is $4.279 for regular unleaded. The most expensive is about $4.80 for premium. I don't know about diesel because I don't buy it, but I do remember seeing it at about $5.10 at one station.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-06-2008, 01:55 PM:
 
Leo, ?, How can the folks over there afford fuel for their cars with price of fuel per litre/gallon so high? thx-Monte
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-06-2008, 02:35 PM:
 
With difficulty! Three possible reasons:

1. There always has been a much higher tax on road fuel in European countries than in the US, so in a way we're used to it.

2. Motorists tend to drive less miles than their north American counterpart. I can't remember where I now read this, but I read somewhere that the average motorist in the US does 18k miles a year, compared to 12 here.

3. Motorists tend to drive more fuel efficient cars here. Anything which does less than 40mpg (imperial gallons) is really considered to be a guzzler. Big saloons, sports cars and SUVs which do under 30 and automatic gearboxes are the exception rather than the rule, and are generally owned only by people who are very wealthy or have a specific reason for needing one (e.g. carrying lots of heavy gear around or have a large family).

The last time I hired a car in the US (November 2006) I think we paid about $50 to fill it up after doing 300 miles or so (although this was in Alaska, so the gas probably cost more than the US average). It was a mid-range, five seat saloon - not a budget car but not a luxury one either. It's a bit difficult to do a direct comparison because in my case there is also the pound/dollar value to take into account. But with all other things being equal I reckon that the fuel cost per mile was only about 20% more than you'd pay to fill a similar car here.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-06-2008, 03:20 PM:
 
Gas at Smith's Foods yesterday was 3.669 with the discount for also shopping there. Costco is about the same if you have a membership but Smith's is much more accessable to get in and back out so I go there. Utah still has gas well below 4 bucks... and we have one of the highest state gas taxes.

Mark
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 06-06-2008, 03:27 PM:
 
Not long now before we all go to work just to fill our cars to to work.
The trouble with this government is they will blame everyone but themselves otherwise its there fault.
Went to work @ 1100am our garage was selling @ 114p per litre came home @ 1700 they were selling @ 115 per litre petrol that is.
Diesel is @ moment 129 litre, and we just roll over and let it happen, we just dont take action of any severe sort.
We have had some protests by haulage companys, but i would like to see the whole country, just stay at home just for one day, but sadly that is not possible.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 06-06-2008, 03:59 PM:
 
If I did the math right at today's exchange rate that's $8.59 USD per gallon. If current conditions continue we should be in that ballpark about a year from now.

I've been riding a 50cc scooter 28-miles a day to work and back since November 2006. In two weeks I'm interviewing for a new job that will have me commuting a little over 30-miles a day.

Assuming I'm hired I'll be looking for something like a 250cc for a better ride to work. The 50cc gets about 100 mpg which has been great. The 250's seem to get around 70 mpg, which still isn't bad. I parked the Mazda in 2002 - don't think I'm going to be owning or driving a car again for at least a couple more years.
 
Posted by Todd McCracken (Member # 4718) on 06-06-2008, 04:56 PM:
 
Los Angeles 4.50 gal

Looks like the subway may have another passenger soon.
 
Posted by Ben Wales (Member # 92) on 06-06-2008, 05:25 PM:
 
I filled up today and a Litre of Diesel was £1.32 with a 2p raise this week, there are some Filling Stations are about £1.26 for Diesel.

And tonight, breaking news on the BBC News24 that Crude Oil had gone up to $132 a barrow!, so more increases are coming as well a recession for us in the UK.
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 06-07-2008, 01:40 PM:
 
Looks like non-tourist parts of 'Vegas have topped the $4.00/gal mark. At my corner Chevron:

Regular - $4.05
Mid-grade - $4.17
Premium - $4.27

Oil closed yesterday at almost $140/bbl. Market watchers are predicting gasoline in the US at $5.00/gal by July 4th.
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 06-07-2008, 02:05 PM:
 
Yah, it's high -- $4.49 in Manhattan a few days ago, but how come this government has never asked us to sacrifice a little. We've never been asked to cut back, to conserve, to do ANYTHING or SOMETHING to put pressure on the foreign oil cartel or even our own oil conglomerate. And not for nothing, picking a day when everyone skips buying gas does nothing if they are just going to go to the pump the next day. It's got to be where we use another form of public transportation for a day instead of the car that will make a difference. And more than just once.

If as they say it's all about demand (does the "demand" go up exponentially every day?) then how about asking the American people to demand less, starting with turning around this pention we have gotten into for buying HUGE vehicles. I mean, who exactly is it that needs to drive an army attach vehicle?

 -

I'll stop here before more than my toe gets in the political pond.

[ 06-07-2008, 07:27 PM: Message edited by: Adam Martin ]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-07-2008, 02:54 PM:
 
In truth, Americans are already changing their driving habits and the the types of vehicles they buy pretty significantly.

The pickup truck and SUV divisions for Ford and GM have been hemorrhaging billions in red ink for years. This week GM announced they're considering drastically reducing the Hummer line of vehicles or selling off the brand entirely. GM has boosted plans on producing the electric Volt vehicle. Toyota unveiled a new Hydrogen fuel cell and electric hybrid version of their popular Prius. Honda is moving a similar hydrogen/electric version of the Accord into leasing arrangements in California.

The government recently reported a 4% year over year decline in driving activity in March 2008 compared to March 2007. They said Americans drove 11 billion fewer miles that Month.

MasterCard reported a 5.5% percent drop on credit card gasoline purchases for Memorial Day weekend compared to last year.

Sales of used pickups and SUVs is down in most areas of the country. They're still selling at satisfactory levels in Oklahoma since there is a great deal of agricultural industry and other work fields that demand pickups and other commercial vehicles. But many others who don't need trucks are getting rid of them.

Our sign company pays a fortune in diesel costs for our crane trucks, and that's translating to higher prices (along with all the other usual cost increases for raw materials). Our sales manager formerly used a Ford F150 pickup to drive to sales calls. Now he's driving a Honda Fit.

I think one of the keys to reducing oil costs is to encourage other "emerging economies" to reduce or completely lift their government subsidies on oil and gasoline. India recently raised its fuel prices due to the price of that subsidy getting very expensive to maintain. Other nations in Asia, including China, agree subsidies must be reduced to curtail demand and combat these spiking oil prices. They have to do that otherwise America's economy will be thrown farther downward enough to affect the global economy in a pretty negative way. Of course, those high oil prices can raise the threat of military confrontations too. It's all around a bad deal.

I still believe this situation with oil is a huge bubble that can be popped. It seems like the same people who ran up prices in the housing industry are poisoning the commodities markets in the same manner. Oil prices could remain high. But a sharp downward "correction" is not out of the question either. If that happens it will wipe out the fortunes for a lot of investors.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 06-07-2008, 03:15 PM:
 
On the little island of Lanai here in Hawaii, gas prices is already over $5.00 a gallon at the only station there. There is no question, gas will cost over $5.00 by mid summer at the way prices are going up almost every day. I put $30.00 worth of gas in my tank the other day and got just about seven gallon. There was a time not too long ago when I used to get a full tank for the amount I spent the other day. Based on the limited amount of driving I do now because I use public transportation a lot, the gas I bought should last me about a week and a half.

-Claude
 
Posted by Louis Belloisy (Member # 3836) on 06-07-2008, 04:06 PM:
 
Connecticut has some of the highest gas prices in the nation, due to high state and fed tax. our crooked politicians will not do anything about it, they need the tax for their social programs. 87 octane was $4.38 this morning

sucks big time

[puke]

Louis
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 06-07-2008, 04:49 PM:
 
Bobby, you are right, people are using less now out of sheer necessity, but so if that's true, and it is as the oil companies claim -- that it's demand that is driving the cost -- then since demand is LESS, how come the price keeps going up?

It's like EVERY summer, just at the driving season, up go the gas prices. Why? "Oh, because we had to take a refinary off line, say the oil companies." Like they couldn't take it off line during the winter. But it seems like that refinary never comes back on line because the prices never goes back down.

Same with the demand. The oil companies clain the prices are going up because of demand and the demand in the summer is greater -- it's supply and demand -- we get that. Well, how come then AFTER the summer driving season, the prices don't come back down, even though the demand subsides? I've watched that for years. Sure, they come down a few cents to make it look like there's a reduction, but they went up 15 - 20 cents and they never go back down as much. Of course now none of that applies because they are just going up no matter what the demand is. You said it yourself, the demand is significantly reduced in the past months. Well?! Where's the corresponding reduction in prices?

I tried to find the answer to a question I once posed here -- someone gave an explanation but I can't find it and I can vaguely remember it. My question is, let's say a gas station has a 5000 gallon tank and he fills it up at $3.00 a gallon. Then the price starts going up, why does he have to adjust the price with each increase that's unrelated to his purchase cost? He's already bought the gas! He is just adding profit because he can. If he sold it at the $3 price (adding his usual profit which is a given percentage over whatever the price purchase price), he would only need to raise the price the next time he buys another fill-up. No?

Other merchants do that all the time. If Target buys 2000 pair of shows for $12, and right after that the supplier raises the price to $15, lucky Target because it can sell its shoes at a lower price than its competition who now has to buy them at $15. Target doesn't immediatly raise the price as if the existing stock cost $15, they sell their shoes, still making his normal profit, but now can keep the price down because of the cheaper price he bought them at.

It's to the retailer's advantage to sell at a lower price -- it gets him more volume, more traffic.

There is no reason why every service station keeps raising the price given the CURRENT price when he's got gas in his tanks that he bought three weeks ago. Because he can, not because he's forced too.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-07-2008, 06:37 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
Bobby, you are right, people are using less now out of sheer necessity, but so if that's true, and it is as the oil companies claim -- that it's demand that is driving the cost -- then since demand is LESS, how come the price keeps going up?
A lot of it is deliberate market manipulation, reality distortion, spin, etc.

Many business people who made lots of money laying waste to the housing industry are trying to find any way they can to protect their wealth. They've shifted a great deal of that money into commodities like oil, corn and rice futures as well as exchanging dollars for gold or other currencies. Unfortunately, lots of hedge funds, mutual funds and lots of other investment have also followed as opportunities have dried up elsewhere. I'm worried a lot of investors are way too exposed to oil in their portfolios.

Various business people involved in oil or selling oil futures are doing anything they can to justify the high prices even though the real truth is the flood of investment has caused those prices to spike artificially. The prices have nothing to do with supply and demand despite what these people say. Even though prices have been spiking lately, the number of futures contracts being sold has been declining over the last year. That sounds pretty odd. That's raising concern a correction could be on the way, and with the inertia of prices spiking higher and higher that could increase the momentum of a downturn correction. Most people want gas prices to be a lot lower, but they don't want a big chunk of their retirement fund to disappear in the process either.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-07-2008, 08:36 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
I tried to find the answer to a question I once posed here -- someone gave an explanation but I can't find it and I can vaguely remember it. My question is, let's say a gas station has a 5000 gallon tank and he fills it up at $3.00 a gallon. Then the price starts going up, why does he have to adjust the price with each increase that's unrelated to his purchase cost? He's already bought the gas! He is just adding profit because he can.
You're right, this WAS covered before but I don't remember what thread it was in. But the explanation is easy.

In retail, you always need to base your selling price on what it will cost you to REPLACE the thing you're selling...not on what you paid for it.

Let's say I buy a widget for $2.00 and my selling price is $3.00. But then I get a new price list from the supplier saying widgets now cost me $3.00. If I stick to my old selling price, I can't replace my inventory and still cover my overhead.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 06-07-2008, 09:47 PM:
 
In retail one can also see their inventory devalue on them...if Mike bought his widgets at $2.00 and typical selling price is at $3.00...then due to the success of the widgets around the world, the price drops such that typical selling prices are now $2.25 and his price is only, $1.50...Mike will need to drop his price to follow the new $2.25 price or face not selling ANY at $3.00 and therefore take a complete loss on the $2.00/widget inventory.

My other favorite thing is the fact that one may have in stock something that is now obsolete so nobody wants the widgets that cost you $2.00 ea since the widget+ that replaced it came out at a possibly lower price!

As for gas...if the stations are located next to each other...they typcially are within a penny of each other...sure you could stick to your price but if your next door neighbor station drops to $3.99 and you are at $4.00...you are going to lose SOME business.

Then again, unlike you, I HAVE seen gas prices drop as much as they have gone up...it does fluctuate based on market forces (both supply/demand as well as investment...etc). The fact that the trend line of it continues to rise as time marches on only means it is like most any other product...movie ticket prices also have a trend line of going up. In a word...it is inflation.

Steve
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-07-2008, 09:57 PM:
 
Unfortunately, it's looking more like "stagflation." Stagnant wages and rising prices. Real great for the misery index.
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 06-07-2008, 10:10 PM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
In retail, you always need to base your selling price on what it will cost you to REPLACE the thing you're selling...not on what you paid for it.

Let's say I buy a widget for $2.00 and my selling price is $3.00. But then I get a new price list from the supplier saying widgets now cost me $3.00. If I stick to my old selling price, I can't replace my inventory and still cover my overhead.

I don't buy that. Retailers don't live from one widget to the next. Unless they are on the verge of bankrupcy, they buy as many as they can afford and they think they can sell. I would think it is the same with selling gasoline. The retailer lives from tank fill to the next tank fill, not from one gallon sale to the next.

In retail, they sell what they have in stock with enough markup to satisfy a reasonable profit based on the price they paid for it, not the price they anticipate they will have to pay for it next month or next quarter. If, say, car dealerships worked the way of your widget model or the way service stations seem to work, they'd have to change the sticker price on the cars in the showrooms every day, contimually marking them up based on what they think next year's models are going to cost them, which is nuts. They sell the current models for what they bought them for plus their markup. When the next years' models come on line, they shell out whatever's the dealer cost and add their markup then. The increase in sales price is made on the new model, not anticipated and added to the in stock models.

There's no good reason why gasoline is sold differently, other than it's a commodity that we as a nation obviously can't do without lest the whole economy collapse, so they can charge whatever they want.

Bottom line is that there certainly are gas stations that have large tanks of gasoline which they purchased at much less than the current price. If free market competiton was at work here, someone, aometime, somewhere, would be selling his gas at his purchase price and doing a walloping business. But prices all rise in unison, which tells me it's artificially controlled there is no real competition in play. We are getting screwed.

Steve is right though; should the actual price of those widgets go DOWN, which on occasion they does happen, if you;ve got that large stock of them, then yes, you will loose -- but such is the risk of being in business. So how come that never happens to gasoline retailers? THEY never get stuck with gallons of gas that they wind up having to sell at a loss.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-07-2008, 11:53 PM:
 
The fact of the matter is oil producers have been price gouging the public over a lot of "what if" factors rather than what's actually going on in the market right now. So if the price of their "widgets" goes down, they've already covered their backsides on that point through hyper-inflated prices.

If Israel could go to war with Iran in 2010, guess what? We get to pay for it right now -even if that war never happens. None of us get a rebate if their bet of "what if" bullshit doesn't come to pass. But we get to pay for it as if it did.

I wish I could call up USAA and tell them they need to pay me $50,000 right now since I'm already a policy holder and there's a remote chance I could get into a car accident sometime later. Even if I never get into a car accident I'd like that money right now, thank you. This is the fucked, warped logic going on with commodities markets. We get to pay for their fucked guesses, even if they never come true.

Oil shot up a couple of dollars per barrel just over a stupid tropical depression forming off the coast of Belize, and that's despite the fact a hurricane premium is already priced into the market already. Again, we're talking about reality distortion and deliberate market manipulation.

I live in a state that profits a great deal off of oil and hurts pretty badly when the oil economy is in the shitter. Even if oil swings down hard, I won't have any sympathy for the plight of oil rights holders. Those folks had better be saving their excess money for that rainy day because none of us are going to forget how that industry has been screwing us.
 
Posted by Anslem Rayburn (Member # 1267) on 06-08-2008, 02:01 AM:
 
You buy 10 items for $1 each.

You sell them for $1.50 each.

You have made $15.00, and spend $10 to replace the original 10.

You have a profit of $5.

----

You buy 10 items for $1 each.

You sell them for $1.50 each.

After selling them, you discover the price has increased for you to $1.50 each.

You have made $15.00, but must now spend $15 to replace the original 10.

You have no profit on your original investment.

---

You buy 10 items for $1 each.

Before selling them you discover the cost to replace them is going to be $1.50 each.

You sell them for $2.00 each.

You have made $20.00, and spend $15 to replace the original 10.

You have a profit of $5.

---

I know when we get word of a substantial price increase on goods, we immediately raise the price, we don't wait until the new inventory is on the shelves.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-08-2008, 06:27 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Unfortunately, it's looking more like "stagflation." Stagnant wages and rising prices. Real great for the misery index.
Taking care to keep this remark in the area of economics and not heading into politics, there is a 'stagflation or just deflation?' debate going on in the papers here at the moment. Gordon Brown's thinking appears to be that if the government can keep wage increases at or below the CPI, that will prevent a stagflation scenario because there simply won't be the money in the system to allow runaway commodity price increases. Given that something like 35% of the British workforce work directly or indirectly for the state (and thus their salaries are controlled by the government), he might just get away with it. The threat, however, is that as people's disposable incomes switch more and more from discretionary to non-discretionary spending (e.g. that trip to the theatre has to be scrapped because of higher food and fuel bills), the job losses and declining tax revenues in those parts of the economy which depend on discretionary consumer spending (again, a terrifying high proportion of the overall British economy) will cause more damage than stagflation would have done.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 06-08-2008, 08:27 AM:
 
Frank,

Have you ever worked/owned a retail establishment? I don't know of any business that would not raise prices on existing stock once new prices are known to the retailer. Anslem pretty well explained it. A retailer that ISN'T going out of business is one that keeps up with their costs versus their profit.

Different businesses do it differently due to their purchasing and or volume. That is, if you have goods that you purchase such that you have say a 6-month supply...it make take most of those 6-months to see an increase coming and thus the retail price appears stable.

Manufacturers typically have annual changes in prices as they will look at the real costs of manufacturing an item whenever they actually make it again. Labor, materials or even compliance with new codes/laws could all affect this.

Your car analogy is really off base as they are inherently model-year dependent. As such, the price can remain stable for the entire year. However, the moment the new model year comes around, last year's model immediately is worth less merely because a new model is available. Gasoline is not model year dependant and it is changed, at the station level rather frequently and as such their purchase price fluctuates much more frequently. The station owner would be stupid to not track fuel prices daily. Have you noticed that these very same station owners don't change prices as often on the convienence store goodies? The market isn't nearly as volitile.

Mind you, I'm not defending the fuel companies that I think are indeed robber barons but in terms of retail...what the station owners are doing is not only not gouging but necessary to stay in business.

Now if you want to see fuel prices in the States drop...get the word "regulation" talked about and all of the sudden the speculation money will move to unregulated waters and prices will fall.

BTW...one would have to be blind to not see people in the US already changing their driving habits in both what they drive and when they drive. Again, due to the nature of living in this country, there is only but so much a person can do and continue to function.

Steve
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 06-08-2008, 10:28 AM:
 
It hasn't really affected my driving habits yet but I do like to grumble about the rising costs for sure [Smile] Until it really gets out of hand, I'll just do what I'm doing now, adjusting in other areas of my life. For instance, I rarely if ever buy any DVD's (thank you Netflix), I buy less clothes and when I do I shop around for bargains, the 99 cent store is my favorite place to shop (when I remember that I can save 2 or 3 bucks on certain items by buying it there instead of Target), etc. An extra $20 a week on gas isnt really that big of a deal to me just yet.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-08-2008, 11:49 AM:
 
If oil and gasoline prices were the only thing rising a lot of people wouldn't have so much anger on this issue. Trouble is rising oil and fuel prices are affecting the costs of many other things. So you're paying for a lot more than just price increases at the pump.

In my town, American Electric Power just passed on a 20%-25% rate increase to customers. That rate increase helped my May electric bill come in at double the price of my April bill, and I haven't been using my air conditioner very much at all. Our city council just voted for another rate increase on the water bill. In the space of 3 years I've seen the base rate for 2000 gallons or less nearly double. We'll probably get another property tax increase as well. Natural gas prices have been rising.

Food prices are getting affected by commodities speculation just like gasoline prices. Milk prices have doubled over the past few years. Cattle ranchers in the United States have been losing lots of money due to sky high feed prices so they've been radically cutting back on their livestock numbers. Some economists are predicting some big price jumps on beef this fall.

Lots of Americans are getting rid of horses, even once valuable registered horses from champion blood lines. Many are simply giving them away for nothing to "buyer killers" who load them up in trucks and send them to Mexico or Canada for slaughter. Lots of race horses are getting served up as dinner in a lot of European and Asian restaurants. This is kind of a personal issue to me since my parents own 15 quarter horses. They're trying to keep those horses as long as they can, but aren't going to go broke doing so. Hay farmers are cutting their throats in the long term. They're destroying their customer base with the last 3 years of price gouging. When times finally get hard for them their neighbors will tell them to go jump off a cliff.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-08-2008, 04:27 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
If, say, car dealerships worked the way of your widget model or the way service stations seem to work, they'd have to change the sticker price on the cars in the showrooms every day, contimually marking them up based on what they think next year's models are going to cost them, which is nuts. They sell the current models for what they bought them for plus their markup.
The car business is a lot different from most other retail businesses. First, a car dealer usually has a large shop in the back which is where the REAL profit is made. (One dealership I know of pays its mechanics $13 - $18 per hour, but charges $59 per hour to the consumer.) They also sell parts at the "list" price, which is about twice what you would pay at an auto parts store for the same parts. Second, new cars have lots of built-in and add-on profit perks, some of which the consumer may never find out about -- like undercoating, "dealer prep," add-on accessories, holdbacks and much more. Third, used cars are a huge profit center too.

Also, cars don't change all that much in price from year to year, let alone day to day like gas can. You can bet that if Ford suddenly found out that it was going to cost $10,000 more each to produce cars starting next year, the price of Fords would jump right now.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-08-2008, 04:36 PM:
 
Actually I think the rising oil prices are the best thing that ever happened to this country. It will finally for the better change the way we live and stop much of the waste that goes on. We have all been on a cheap ride for way to long whilst other countries have had gas prices this high or much higher for decades. The higher prices will finally force the U.S. automakers and other manufacturers to get with it and stop dicking around. Evidence of that is already extant with GM announcing the closure of 4 of it's existing truck plants and one of those is to be converted over to producing the new Volt Electric Car. They expect to have over 100,000 of them on the roads by 2012. It will also bring forth new forms of public transit in places that heve none.

Mark
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 06-08-2008, 05:02 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
I tried to find the answer to a question I once posed here -- someone gave an explanation but I can't find it and I can vaguely remember it. My question is, let's say a gas station has a 5000 gallon tank and he fills it up at $3.00 a gallon. Then the price starts going up, why does he have to adjust the price with each increase that's unrelated to his purchase cost? He's already bought the gas! He is just adding profit because he can. If he sold it at the $3 price (adding his usual profit which is a given percentage over whatever the price purchase price), he would only need to raise the price the next time he buys another fill-up. No?

This also happens in the other direction but nobody complains. When the wholesale price drops, the price at the pump drops immediately even though the gas station paid more for the fuel in the ground.
 
Posted by Sean McKinnon (Member # 612) on 06-08-2008, 05:19 PM:
 
It is around $4.30 a gallon for the High Test stuff here on the north shore of Boston. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Michael Dolan (Member # 4808) on 06-08-2008, 06:23 PM:
 
We just hit $3.99 in NE Ga. this morning.

Its amazing how upset everyone was on the first couple of pages of this thread when gas was around $1.60

Now look how far we've come. [Mad] [thumbsdown]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-08-2008, 07:10 PM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
This also happens in the other direction but nobody complains. When the wholesale price drops, the price at the pump drops immediately even though the gas station paid more for the fuel in the ground.
Maybe that happens in your part of Florida, but it definitely doesn't happen here in Oklahoma -and this is oil country.

Gas prices tend to spike upward at any opportunity. At least they've been doing so for the past few years. When the price of oil drops, gas stations take a long time coming off of those prices. Recent example. Oil declined from $135 per barrel down to near $120. Prices didn't change at the pumps. They held steady or kept creeping upward. Now with oil near $140 per barrel the gas stations will have reason enough to propel prices well past $4 per gallon in every part of the nation and go past $5 per gallon on diesel.

quote: Mike Blakesley
The car business is a lot different from most other retail businesses.
True. And it's very different from the oil business. People have a choice about buying a car. They can choose to keep driving the same old vehicle or get something else -perhaps something different from the same old gas guzzling models Detroit's auto makers have been selling. So if an auto company decides to jack up its prices due to materials costs, it will risk customers choosing to sit on the sidelines as a result.

Anyone who has to drive for purposes of commuting and other needs has no choice about buying gasoline. They're stuck.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Actually I think the rising oil prices are the best thing that ever happened to this country. It will finally for the better change the way we live and stop much of the waste that goes on.
This is coming from someone who talks openly about driving a Hummer, or Range Rover?

Still, I do see the positive about it as well. I can recall car commercials from the late 1970s and 1980s where gas mileage numbers were a big part of the ad. We rarely ever see that these days even with record high gas prices. It's as if the auto makers don't want to cast a negative light on the far lower levels of fuel efficiency in their higher priced vehicles. I think they're going to have to get back to running those gas mileage numbers in the ads again.

The high gasoline prices are going to force auto makers and other business and industry people to get a lot more serious about developing alternative sources of energy. For decades they've just made fun of such efforts as bunny hugger environmentalist nonsense. Now the cost situation has the fire lit under their asses finally.

Once we're able to get a handle on this situation it will dry up a lot of funding going to international terrorists in the middle east. Once we're able to get more energy independent it will force many violent parts of the world to grow up and get peaceful or get starved out of existence.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-08-2008, 09:08 PM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
This also happens in the other direction but nobody complains. When the wholesale price drops, the price at the pump drops immediately even though the gas station paid more for the fuel in the ground.

What actually happens is:

- Price of oil goes up $1 a barrel
- Price of gas goes up 5¢ per gallon

- Price of oil goes down $1 a barrel
- Price of gas goes down per gallon and consumers celebrate
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-08-2008, 09:24 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
This is coming from someone who talks openly about driving a Hummer, or Range Rover?

Yep! We bought them because we felt they will more than likely be the last large off road vehicles one will be able to own. Sort of a final farewell. They are both really great vehicles and both have been more or less trouble free. They don't really get that bad of gas milage... the Humnmer wins the contest though at about 19mpg if you drive it nice, not over 70mph. The Land Rover does about 17mpg at not over 70mph. I won't regret buying them till gas hits about 10 bucks a gallon.

Mark
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 06-08-2008, 09:38 PM:
 
Personally even though I hate paying $75 (at today's prices) to fill my Pathfinder with the recommended premium, I think the surge in gas prices is a good thing. US consumers have had it far too easy on this issue for far too long, compared to the rest of the world. It's about time we get slapped upside the head. I think gas will plateau around $5 a gallon soon and hover there for a while before it resumes its rise.

BTW my '07 6-cyl Pathfinder gets about 20MPG if I drive it nicely on the highway, but only around 14-15 commuting to work. Am I going to dump it so I can get better mileage? No.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-09-2008, 12:22 AM:
 
I think most people who buy a new car to "save money on gas" are just using that as an excuse to buy a new car. OK, so you get a couple extra miles a gallon....how long will it take to save the $30,000 or more that a new car costs? Unless you're really ready to trade anyway, or unless you're a person who must drive a lot, it makes more sense to keep the old car and keep it tuned up, and cut down on unnecessary or "recreational" driving.

I used to enjoy a nice cruise after work for a half hour or so, but I don't do that too often any more. Gas is $3.94 here now.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-09-2008, 12:37 AM:
 
$30,000?

The Honda Fit we just bought for our sales manager to use for driving to sales calls cost less than $15,000. It gets up to 34mpg on the highway, which is close to double the fuel economy his Ford F150 was getting.
 
Posted by Richard Hamilton (Member # 321) on 06-09-2008, 04:14 AM:
 
I traded in the Escalade last year because of the gas I was putting in it every day. Not only was I paying a shitload for gas, but I couldn't get a decent price on the trade in. They really didn't want it because they had too many SUVs on the lot, and they didn't think they could sell it. Ripple effect????
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-09-2008, 04:15 AM:
 
I've always been impressed of the small vehicles sold in Europe. Vehicles with motors less than 1000cc in size, and their biggest, in economy mode, hits up to 1400cc and using both fuel types of diesel and gasoline.

The new generation that's coming around will probably be driving vehicles here in the states with motors of these sizes in them by the time the Big Three wakes up and gets serious with making subcompacts and hybrid vehicles.

I was even impressed with the E.Germany's Trebant even though it was the most horrible car ever made (I still see Yugos on the road - seems that they're not that all bad...),but if one can bring that car back and put in a better effective motor in it, this would be quite the retro vehicle to be issued again.

I agree with Mark totally: enjoy your two vehicles while you can since you know that they'll last as long as you keep them in full maintenance schedules.

We just purchased a KIA Rondo - their crossover vehicle that just came to these shores, (even though it's been out in Europe since 1999 as the Carens..) and we get very good mileage with it at 27mpg as long as I behave on the freeways with it - and it'll be our last car as long as I'm able to do the prevMNT on it .. and other drivers have the same idea instead of taking this dream away when they lose control of their sanity in driving on the road.

quote: Richard Hamilton
They really didn't want it because they had too many SUVs on the lot, and they didn't think they could sell it. Ripple effect????

I know it's real sad to see this. When I pass a lot of car lots - new and used, that is all I see in them .. just loaded with SUV's and pickups..and I'm sure that the used inventory is growing like mad of these vehicles at these dealerships.

Where are all of these used gas guzzlers are going to head to eventually? These lots looks like they're massively overloaded with inventory that looks like an invasion of white elephants to their business in staying profitable.

quote:
"Ask me about Trajan"
(the 2nd of the 5 great Emperors of Rome?)

-Monte
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-09-2008, 08:06 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The Honda Fit we just bought for our sales manager to use for driving to sales calls cost less than $15,000. It gets up to 34mpg on the highway, which is close to double the fuel economy his Ford F150 was getting.

Ha, I wonder what happened to the 40 mpg plus that the old 1970's Honda Civic's used to get.

Mark
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 06-09-2008, 09:10 AM:
 
quote: David Stambaugh
US consumers have had it far too easy on this issue for far too long, compared to the rest of the world. It's about time we get slapped upside the head.
The reason we have had it "far too easy" compared to Europe is due to the ridiculous level of taxes that European countries slap on gas (or petrol as they call it). The consumers that have it "far too easy" and still have it that way are the consumers in oil producing countries like Venezuela and some in the middle east where the government SUBSIDIZES the price of gas and they are paying less than $1 per gallon.

quote: Monte L Fullmer
I've always been impressed of the small vehicles sold in Europe. Vehicles with motors less than 1000cc in size, and their biggest, in economy mode, hits up to 1400cc and using both fuel types of diesel and gasoline.
One of the issues with producing cars for the US that get the kind of milage that some of those cars in Europe get are the safety regulations. There is a lot of weight added to a vehicle so that it passes the crash tests. The only way to get really high levels of fuel economy in a US vehicle (over MPG) will be to use advanced (and expensive) materials to add to the strenght to weight ratio. Of course, what good would a car be if it got 80 MPG highway if it had the size and perfomance of a Honda Civic and cost $50,000?

BTW, Ford is going in the smaller engine direction with their "Ecoboost" line. It's basically a line of turbocharged engines where a V6 gets the power of a V8 and a I4 delivers the power of a V6. They are saying that replaceing the V8 with the EcoBoost V6 or the V6 with an EcoBoost V8 in the same vehicle will result in a 20% improvement in Fuel Economy.

The new consumer focus on Fuel Economy is a good thing. I don't buy in to the "greenhouse gas" thing but it certainly couldn't do any harm to release less CO2. More important, the less gas we use, the less money the wacko terrorists in the middle east will get. That's why in a couple of months I'll be replacing my Chevy Avalanche (which I love) that averages around 16 MPG (combined city/hwy driving) with a Ford Escape Hybrid that it rated at 30 MPG Highway and 34 MPG City. I am willing to give up a little versitility to basically double the gas milage.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-09-2008, 09:38 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
$30,000?

The Honda Fit we just bought for our sales manager to use for driving to sales calls cost less than $15,000.

Bobby, I thought you were smart enough to know that I was just throwing out a general number. There are lots of cars costing less than 30K and plenty of cars that cost much more.

Even at $15K and $60 per fill-up, at $4 per gallon, you would need 250 fill-ups to spend that much money. I don't know how much you drive, but it would take me between 7 and 10 years to do that many fill-ups. Like I said, unless you drive enough to fill up more than once a week, it's silly to buy a new vehicle JUST to save on gas. You're money ahead to just keep the vehicle tuned and try to drive less. Of course, if you're talking about a company vehicle that puts on hundreds of miles a day, the equation would be different.
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 06-09-2008, 09:48 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The high gasoline prices are going to force auto makers and other business and industry people to get a lot more serious about developing alternative sources of energy. For decades they've just made fun of such efforts as bunny hugger environmentalist nonsense. Now the cost situation has the fire lit under their asses finally.

Old habits die hard. The car manufacturers may have gotten the message, but they don't seem be ready yet to admit publicly that we are going to have to change our ideas about cars, driving and efficiency. Instead of offering vehicles which get better mpg, they offer to pay for your gas so you can still buy their inefficient cars and drive they way you're accustomed to....just keep doing what your doing seems to be the message. GM's ads say, "We're doing something about the price of gas...." No you're not.

And I was recently in Florida where EVERYONE drives at freakin 80 - 90 mph on I95. Not a lot of people seem to get it that they need to CHANGE their habits and drive more conservatively. Maybe gas DOES have to reach $10 before it sinks in that this is not only a SIGNIFICANT economic problem, but one that finances our enemies. Maybe it has to come to, you can fill up your tank or buy food for the week, but you can't afford to do both, before we collectively "get it." We certainly know the government isn't educating the populous to make changes; it's content to make us put shampoo and mouthwash in 3oz bottles and put them in plastic bags (all of which, ironically, requires us to use more plastic), deluding us into thinking that makes us safe.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 06-09-2008, 10:46 AM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
And I was recently in Florida where EVERYONE drives at freakin 80 - 90 mph on I95. Not a lot of people seem to get it that they need to CHANGE their habits and drive more conservatively.
I'm one of those people. In my avalanche, driving 70 MPH I get about 19.7 MPG highway. Driving 80 MPH I get about 16.7 MPG. I know that I can get 3 MPG more driving 10 MPH less BUT....

On a 330 Mile drive that I do pretty often, driving 80 MPH gets me there in 4 hours, 7 minutes. The same drive takes 4 hours, 43 minutes at 70 MPH. At 80 MPH I use about 19.76 gallons of gas vs 16.75 gallons at 70 MPH. I make a concious choice to use about $12 more gas to save 36 minutes on the trip. You might think I'm stupid but in reality even at 70 MPH my gas cost is going to be $67 anyway so why not add another $12 and save a lot of time.

I can save that $12 by eating at home and cooking my own food instead of eating out.

Honestly, the biggest problem with fuel prices isn't on the consumer filling up the car level, it's on the adding cost to everything else level. People can adjust and adapt to prices at the pump. The issue is that with diesel and petroleum based fertilizer costing more (combined with so much farm land being dedicated to corn to make pointless ethanol) it is raising prices of food and other goods considerably.
 
Posted by Chad Souder (Member # 343) on 06-09-2008, 11:59 AM:
 
quote: Lyle Romer
combined with so much farm land being dedicated to corn to make pointless ethanol
Could you please explain why ethanol is pointless?
 
Posted by Richard Hamilton (Member # 321) on 06-09-2008, 12:03 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
And I was recently in Florida where EVERYONE drives at freakin 80 - 90 mph on I95.
It's like that on every interstate. Try driving through Atlanta on I75 at any given time of the day
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 06-09-2008, 12:14 PM:
 
quote: Chad Souder
Could you please explain why ethanol is pointless?
Yes, let's use food to fuel our cars. [uhoh]
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 06-09-2008, 01:15 PM:
 
quote: Chad Souder
Could you please explain why ethanol is pointless?
Many reasons:

1) Corn-based ethanol provides best case a 25% energy gain. You can't just look at the end result of x number of gallons of ethanol. You have to look at the energy used to plant the corn, harvest the corn, process it into ehtanol and ship it. You must also take into account that petroleum based fertilizer is used to fertilize the corn fields.

There are many studies that actually say it takes more energy to produce it than you get out of it.

2) Since corn is a food crop, planting "ethanol corn" instead of animal feed and food corn is causing the price of corn based food and corn fed livestock products to go up.

Basically, corn-based ethanol is just a giant farm subsidy hidden under the guise of energy independence and environmentalism.

If there are some breakthroughs in cellulostic ethanol which can use switchgrass (a weed basically), agricultural waste and even trees to produce ethanol then it may become viable. Using a vitally important food crop to produce fuel is pointless and stupid.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-09-2008, 01:32 PM:
 
Saw in the paper today the GM is contemplating of either selling it off, or putting the axe on the HUMMER line. They're losing money big time on this line.

I always wonder why the E85 craze took off when you know that ethanol has less BTU putput than regular fuels. Thus, the trade off of cheaper fuel is less MPG in the long run.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-09-2008, 01:34 PM:
 
It currently takes nearly a gallon of fuel to create a gallon of ethanol. There's very little gain, making the whole ethanol fad a very stupid, wasteful thing. We're not gaining fuel efficiency. We're just making corn-based products, including most life stock feed, a lot more expensive. Corn producers are doing a great job scamming the government and consumers.

Sugar cane and sugar beets can be used to make alcohol based fuel. The Brazilians do it and get a roughly 8 to 1 ratio on the return (8 gallons of alcohol for every gallon of fuel burned in the production process).

There's a lot of promises being made about converting everything from trash to switch grass into ethanol, but the technology is far from being able to deliver on those promises.

I think methods like hydrogen fuel cell technology show more potential.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 06-09-2008, 02:24 PM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I think methods like hydrogen fuel cell technology show more potential.

But where are you going to get the Hydrogen from? You won't find it naturally, and the only two processes which I'm aware of for making it on an industrial scale are electrolysis of water, for which you need a lot of electric power which could probably be better used powering electric vehicles, and steam reforming of natural gas, which could probably also be better used directly. We had a few fuel cell buses on trial in London, but I they've gone now, and they were very expensive.

Unless you've got large amounts of electric power available from non-fossil sources, such as hydro or nuclear, then I think fuel cells are a non-starter.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-09-2008, 03:35 PM:
 
quote: Frank Angel
Old habits die hard. The car manufacturers may have gotten the message, but they don't seem be ready yet to admit publicly that we are going to have to change our ideas about cars, driving and efficiency. Instead of offering vehicles which get better mpg, they offer to pay for your gas so you can still buy their inefficient cars and drive they way you're accustomed to....
It has nothing to do with habits. People want to buy more fuel-efficient cars, but the Fords and the GMs of the world can't just get up tomorrow morning and build them -- they have to be designed, tested, approved by a million bean-counters and government authorities, and then the tooling has to be created and assembly set up, and so on and on.

The Fords and GMs and probably working on about the 2015 cars right now. I don't envy those people...having to guess now what people will want years from now. At least in the exhibition business we only have to guess a few weeks ahead!
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-09-2008, 03:55 PM:
 
quote: Stephen Furley
Unless you've got large amounts of electric power available from non-fossil sources, such as hydro or nuclear, then I think fuel cells are a non-starter.
True, but hydrogen does offer a reasonably efficient way of storing energy for later use in a moving vehicle. Hydrogen production plants could be powered by renewable energy, operating only when the sun is shining, wind is blowing etc. Once you've produced the hydrogen, you can then (i) store it until needed, and (ii) use it to power a moving vehicle.

I'd guess that reason why the fuel cell buses were uneconomic the first time was that burning oil was more cost-effective when the price was lower. The higher it gets, the more viable alternative fuels become.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 06-09-2008, 08:41 PM:
 
What about "Mr. Fusion"? It seemed to work on almost anything. Doc Brown had the technology back in 1985!
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-09-2008, 08:52 PM:
 
I'll still side with Natural gas. The technology for using that in an automobile existed way before Mr. Fusion! There is supposedly enough Natural Gas on the planet to last us for several centuries(not projctors). By then the visiting aliens will have helped us clean up the planet and shown us a better design for traveling that uses light as the power source... if they already haven't done so... [Eek!]
 
Posted by Tony Bandiera Jr (Member # 2365) on 06-10-2008, 01:01 AM:
 
We've hit $4.40/gal for reg. unleaded here...and it is said that we will for sure break $5.00 before Labor Day....

Even my Ranger now costs over $50.00 to fill up... [Mad]
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 06-10-2008, 09:08 PM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I'll still side with Natural gas.
Agreed. I've been kicking around the natural has vehicle (NGV) conversion idea for the longest time. The ability to fill up with cheap fuel at home using a pump such as the FuelMaker Phill sounds very attractive; a conversion would be just the ticket, along with a rebuilt engine, to clean up the exhaust on my 1964 F-100, a vintage truck devoid of emission controls and destined for the crusher if the state ever manages to get its way with getting old vehicles off the road.

Alas, the pump and an NGV conversion would probably cost as much as a decent used car. Also, aftermarket NGV conversions (and, for that matter, new NGVs) are getting harder to find these days.
 
Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 06-11-2008, 10:01 AM:
 
Gasoline is now $4.49(.9)at the gas station near my house by the beach here in San Franciso.

If current trends continue I wouldn't be surprised to see it hit $5/gal by the end of the year here.
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 06-12-2008, 08:39 AM:
 
Todays price @ my local petrol= 1.17 deisel 1.30 thats
 
Posted by Ben Wales (Member # 92) on 06-14-2008, 07:25 PM:
 
quote: Alan Plester
Todays price @ my local petrol= 1.17 deisel 1.30 thats

You are lucky to find a Garage with Fuel - as in my home town Southampton I had to search at least 4 Garages for Diesel as they were sold out and they were not Shell Garages!.

Dispite the Government advice not to Panic buy, people have been in some areas today and supplies of fuel is becoming a problem and this dispute with the Shell Tanker Drivers is also set for next weekend!.

In my area today at least 100 Tractors,Trucks,Taxis and cars did a Go-Slow Convoy protest on a busy Highway to give the Government the message about the high Fuel costs.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-15-2008, 02:34 AM:
 
Does The working people in the UK have a mininum wage and if so, how does the effect of high fuel prices affect them?

Over here in the States, ours is at $5.85/hr with an increase next month to $6.55/hr. Then, in 2009 at the same month of July, it will increase to $7.25/hr,thus showing that the 4 dollar/gallon prices is going to stay with us for a good time unless a miracle in the Middle East can ease some tensions over there and cause our dollar to gain strength and drive the price of oil down to more acceptable levels.
 
Posted by Ray Faultless (Member # 903) on 06-15-2008, 04:37 AM:
 
The minimum wage in the UK is £5.52 per hour.
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 06-15-2008, 05:47 AM:
 
Todays price of deisel ONE POUND THIRTY TWO PENCE ye gods.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 06-15-2008, 10:11 AM:
 
Holy Moly...the US Dollar is on a march! Its only $1.53 to the Euro (versus nearly $1.60 a few weeks or so ago) and it is only $1.95 to a GBP (was over $2.00) and we once again are beating the Canadian Dollar (a mere $.97...such a bargain).

Okay with all of these gains I'm SURE the price of gas will be plumiting back to pre 1995 rates!

Okay....I'm waiting......still waiting..... <sigh>
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-15-2008, 03:09 PM:
 
We'll have to see what comes from the meeting next week between Saudi oil ministers and representatives from various developed oil consuming nations. The Saudis contend the world has adequate oil supply and that the high prices we're paying are totally unjustified. The Saudis say they'll start pumping oil from their 500,000 barrel per day Khursaniyah field and may increase output at other fields.

A G-8 nations meeting focused on spiking commodities prices. Leaders said the rampant inflation in food and fuel commodities is now posing a greater risk to the world economy than the credit crisis that resulted from the stupidly mismanaged real estate market.

A growing level of attention and anger is getting directed toward commodities speculators. Currently, speculators can pay a tiny amount to option a futures contract. They do that instead of putting up all the money to cover the bet up front. Lots of traders just buy options, but it helps jack up the price of commodities like oil, corn and rice anyway. Politicians in various countries, including the United States, are now calling for new rules or other limits to be imposed on speculators.

Gasoline here in my town is now $3.75 per gallon for 87 octane. Diesel is still near $4.50.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-15-2008, 10:39 PM:
 
$3.999 here as of yesterday. Highest in the state is $4.199.
 
Posted by Anslem Rayburn (Member # 1267) on 06-16-2008, 01:54 AM:
 
Saw $4.07 while running errands this morning.
 
Posted by Charles Greenlee (Member # 3856) on 06-16-2008, 02:05 AM:
 
Varies, seen $3.949 and as high as $4.089. I just thankful I picked a car that gets 37.7 MPG over that mustang. And my car's a convertable too. :-p It's not a hybrid either, that's just normal gas. Thoigh I am driving what at seems is like a fancy Golf cart. It's a '94 Hinda Civic - Del Sol
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-16-2008, 04:36 AM:
 
Nothing wrong with Hondas .. remember the Honda 600 coupe - "the Lunchbox Honda" from 1969 til they were replaced by the Civic in 1973?

The 600 had a 598cc,4stroke, aircooled twin up in the front end, rode on 10inch tires and only cost $1200 bucks new in dealers. You might say that gave VW's stiff competition in economy, but the little bug was more popular and Japanese inports wasn't too well accepted back then.

But that 600 easilly mustered 30 plus MPG driving in town.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-16-2008, 11:12 AM:
 
$18 a gallon, anyone? [Eek!]

"The manager said the move was to conserve stocks and said he was not being mean."

Conserving stocks - my bumhole! Presumably he's the only station in the area which hasn't run out and is out to make a fat profit on the stuff he has left.

"I would say I'm a very nice person." [puke]
 
Posted by Ben Wales (Member # 92) on 06-16-2008, 03:56 PM:
 
And here is the picture (taken from the BBC News) that shows a Garage selling Fuel £1.99 a Litre for Fuel.
[Eek!]

 -
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 06-16-2008, 08:01 PM:
 
If my calculations are correct, about US$14.81 a US gallon??!!! “Extortionate” does not adequately describe that price! [Eek!]

Edit: The Beeb website quotes “more than £9 a gallon.” That's an imperial gallon.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-17-2008, 01:22 AM:
 
Sorry; forgot about that. Imperial gallon = 4.56 litres; US gallon = (IIRC) 3.8.

To be honest I can't understand why the media insists in translating petrol prices into gallons: the stuff has been sold in litres here for around 20 years now. I can only guess it's because fuel economy figures for cars are still expressed in MPG and so people want that reference point. But even there miles per litre strikes me as a simpler measure, and as a litre is the same everywhere, one which doesn't introduce any possibility for misunderstanding. In rough terms, 10 MPL is about average, 5 is a guzzler and 15 is seriously efficient.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-17-2008, 06:06 PM:
 
I read the news before I left home this morning and they said that gas prices peaked out yesterday. I guess this story was backed up by the $3.789 gas I saw at two different Maverick Stations this morning. Of course my tank was already full...

Mark
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-18-2008, 02:16 AM:
 
The wife and I are on a two week vacation to Kansas, and while traveling across the midwest to this state, it's amazing how prices in Wyo and Neb are much lower than we poor folks in Idaho.

I left my residence, filling up at Albertsons (with their preferred card to save 3 pennies per gallon) at $4.009 - managed to bypass filling up in Utah (which their prices on what Mark mentions) until I hit Wyo and did a series of fill at $3.749 up to $3.879 across the state.

Nebraska is also in this price range.

The one thing that really stuck out was the vehicles themselves on the road this time of year: Usually, you'd see a rather even mix of cars and 18 wheelers. Now, it had drastically changed to one car to 5 of those big rigs. And the real sad thing is the price for their fuel being much higher than we travellers in our cars and other gasoline vehicles.

(Gee Mark, time to drag out the Harley, for there was tons of them also on the road)
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-18-2008, 03:36 PM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
Gee Mark, time to drag out the Harley, for there was tons of them also on the road
Nope... Sold the Harley a couple months ago and added the $$ to the retirement account. Have barely ridden it in the last two years... I think a total of just 87 miles. It never gave particuluarly good milage anyway... Too many mods done to soup it up over the years. I thought I'd miss it but haven't so far.

Mark
 
Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 06-18-2008, 05:02 PM:
 
At the corner Chevron today (USD/US gallon):

$4.25 - Regular
$4.37 - Mid Test
$4.47 - Premium

One independent in town is still clinging to $3.99 for regular.
 
Posted by Ben Wales (Member # 92) on 06-18-2008, 05:11 PM:
 
My local Shell Fuel Garage has increased Diesel to £1.27 a litre after it reopened after several days of closure while it ran out Fuel!.

Some reports of Diesel now at £1.39 in some local Garages.
And on the BBC News tonight have forcast our Domestic Gas & Electric Bills could raise a further 40% this Winter [Eek!]
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-18-2008, 05:55 PM:
 
Diesel has been the wrong side of £1.30 in York, Leeds and everywhere in between for a couple of weeks now. Petrol is still around £1.17-18 in most places, though in motorway and dual carriageway service stations it has now busted £1.20.

I've discovered that by slipstreaming a lorry and driving the motorway bit of the commute at 60mph rather than 70 I'm achieving about a 10% fuel burn saving on each sector, so to speak. It's probably adding around 2-3 minutes onto a 50-minute journey (the motorway stretch is 10.3 miles out of a 26.1 mile journey), which is no great hardship.
 
Posted by Alan Plester (Member # 852) on 06-25-2008, 11:13 AM:
 
Just found a forcourt 7 miles from my house as we were going out for my birthday lunch, and they were selling petrol at the amazing price of ONE TWENTY THREE ltr ! you read that right, petrol. ruined my lunch
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-25-2008, 12:01 PM:
 
The gas prices here in Lawton rose to $3.95 per gallon for 87 octane "regular" grade gasoline. The price was $3.82 yesterday. I guess the gas stations are gearing up for 4th of July traffic.
 
Posted by Robert Crabtree (Member # 4795) on 06-25-2008, 12:32 PM:
 
I've noticed locally a lot of places have stagnated recently- I think it's been in the 3.90s for a couple of weeks. I guess the sticker shock of 4.00 is keeping it at bay...for now. Lowest I've seen is yesterday, 3.91 in various places around Pinellas Park.
 
Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 06-26-2008, 05:21 PM:
 
More tidings of comfort and joy...

Still, look on the bright side: £1.47 a litre is still cheaper than beer (well, any remotely drinkable beer at any rate)!
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 06-27-2008, 09:37 AM:
 
This morning gas prices in Lawton rose to $3.98 per gallon for 87 octane gasoline. And these are about the lowest prices for fuel in the country.

Meanwhile, the price of oil is reaching new record highs. Overnight, oil hit $142 per barrel in Asia trading before pulling back to $141. Lots of prognosticators are trying to talk up the price of oil hitting $150 per barrel before July 4.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-27-2008, 01:40 PM:
 
Finally broke over the $4 mark here Wednesday -- $4.059 (a 6 cent jump).

Outside of seeing a few more 4-wheelers around town, there doesn't seem to be any less traffic than usual. One of our big local events, the "Matthew Quigley Buffalo Rifle Shoot" (inspired by the movie Quigley Down Under) drew about 2 dozen more shooters than last year, even though the organizers thought the numbers would be down due to the fuel prices.
 
Posted by Rick Raskin (Member # 1561) on 06-27-2008, 02:48 PM:
 
Saw 3.89 at a few stations. The average is 3.92 with many hitting the $4 mark. Also I'm seeing fewer crazies on the road. Seems like the high price is slowing them down.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 06-27-2008, 03:01 PM:
 
Took a trip from Richmond to Winston Salem N.C. on Wednesday and found gas to generally be about $.15 cheaper in N.C.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 06-27-2008, 09:57 PM:
 
Believe it or not, prices actually decreased at some gas stations around here. At two Arco stations not far from my home, regular went from $4.439-4.479 a gallon down to $4.399/gallon. Wow, up to eight whole cents a gallon. [Smile]

Not exactly something to get my hopes up over, especially with no sustained decrease in the price of oil in sight...
 
Posted by Charles Greenlee (Member # 3856) on 06-28-2008, 01:57 AM:
 
We've also had a small drop anywhere from 5-10 cents. Though some stations are still over $4.00, and refuse to drop.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-05-2008, 11:01 PM:
 
Three months later.

The price of oil is now $92 per barrel. Gasoline prices here dropped below $3 per gallon over the weekend. 87 octane is selling for $2.89 per gallon. I'm not sure if the price has even been under $3 a gallon all year.

With all the bank shakeups and the global economy looking at a significant slowdown some economists are saying oil prices could get as low as $60 per barrel.
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 10-05-2008, 11:11 PM:
 
Wow, Bobby, that's getting good. It was $3.11 in Jersey on Friday.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-06-2008, 12:08 AM:
 
$3.43 here for regular.
 
Posted by Charles Greenlee (Member # 3856) on 10-06-2008, 03:18 AM:
 
3.44.9 here I think
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 10-06-2008, 06:28 PM:
 
$3.159 for regular in Indianapolis near the airport employee's lot. (Frugal regional jet co-pilot daughter) Louis
 
Posted by Brad Allen (Member # 470) on 10-06-2008, 10:21 PM:
 
$3.46 still here.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-07-2008, 01:57 AM:
 
Dang, we're still high in this area then compared to the rest of the nation then: $3.61
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 10-07-2008, 08:42 AM:
 
$3.14 - $3.30. Stations with a competitor right across the street have the lower prices.

Are there still shortages in the US Southeast? Haven't seen anything about that for awhile.
 
Posted by Chad Souder (Member # 343) on 10-08-2008, 08:00 PM:
 
I filled up today with 10% ethanol for $2.92.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 10-08-2008, 08:11 PM:
 
Supposed shortages in NC/SC but I think it's more related to price gouging than a true shortage. The NC Atty general is investigating numerous instances of reported gouging.

Fuel here dropped about .12 from on Monday. The station I fill up at regularly was at $3.38 today for 87 octane which is all I will burn.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 10-09-2008, 12:23 AM:
 
The lowest I've seen here so far is $2.699.
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 10-10-2008, 07:54 AM:
 
quote: Jason Black
Supposed shortages in NC/SC but I think it's more related to price gouging than a true shortage.
So what exactly is "price gouging" in a free market where competition is supposed to be the natural regulator of prices? I mean, who decides that and based on what? If one guy is selling gas at $3.15 a gal and another is selling it for $3.50, is that price gouging or just one guy thinks he can make more profit? And if some gov agency can say, you can't charge higher than $n a gallon because that would be price gouging, then why can't they say, anything over $2.50 is price gouging? Seems like the govenment intefering by claiming price gouging is just a wimpy form of regulation. And if they are going to regulate, then they should get a set of balls and do it. Freeze the price or cap it or whatever other nafarios things they do when they step into the socialism quicksand, but if it is NOT regulated, then they should keep their nose out of it and let the market do what it's going to do. Capitalism sometimes is painful. And I am not saying that I disagree with regulation in some instances, but if they are going to do it, then bite the bullet and get off the fence.

I admit I don't understand any of this, and I guess I've got representatives in congress representing me, because it seems THEY don't understand any of it either! How is it for example, that everyone is saying there isn't enough money for heathcare and for the infrastructure and for education and they are holding the candidates feet to the fire to explain how they are going to pay for all the stuff they claim they will fix once they get elected.....how will they possibly find the money to do this and that and the candidates are stumbling all over themselves trying to explain how they can do it without raising taxes. Yet, all of a sudden, in less than two freakin weeks, they are able to find 700 BILLION DOLLARS to give to the banks? Where was THAT money hiding? And why don't they go back there and get some more for us? Oh, yah, they say it's OUR money, so how come all this time they weren't using it to do all the stuff for US -- you know, all that stuff everyone agrees needs to be done?

They say we have a deficit of trillions. Well I'd like to know who is lending us all this freakin money.....and how come they keep on lending us more without wanting any of it back? I know if I owe a couple of grand on a credit card and I skip a few payments, they sure as hell come banging on the door wanting that money. Like I said, I don't understand any of it. All I know is, every summer just before driving season, the price of gas goes up -- supply and demand. OK, I get that. But then in the fall, AFTER the driving season is over and demand relaxes, the price goes back down a bit, but NEVER to where it was before.

Price manipulation is like pornography....I can't give you a precise definition of it, but I know it when I see it.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-10-2008, 08:49 AM:
 
Another 10¢ price drop.

87 octane here in Lawton is now at $2.79 per gallon. Currently, the price of oil is trading for just under $80 per barrel.

I would be smiling about that. But it's kind of hard to do so with the Dow Jones losing over 2000 points this week (with another 500+ point drop just in the opening minutes of trading this morning). This time last year, the DJIA was near 15000 points. Now it's struggling to stay above 8000.

quote: Frank Angel
How is it for example, that everyone is saying there isn't enough money for heathcare and for the infrastructure and for education and they are holding the candidates feet to the fire to explain how they are going to pay for all the stuff they claim they will fix once they get elected.....how will they possibly find the money to do this and that and the candidates are stumbling all over themselves trying to explain how they can do it without raising taxes. Yet, all of a sudden, in less than two freakin weeks, they are able to find 700 BILLION DOLLARS to give to the banks?
The government does not have any of that money. They borrow it. They do so through selling bonds and all sorts of other stuff. The United States has a $52 trillion unfunded liability -that's the combined total of our $10 trillion+ in government debt along with another $40 trillion+ largely going into funding our absurd health care system. Still, the United States government has a much larger "credit line" than most banks.

I'm concerned the "cascading" crash we have seen on Wall Street is just the beginning. That's just from the massive correction happening in the housing/mortgage industry. IMHO, the health care sector and higher education sectors are due for massive corrections too. Both industries have had runaway price inflation for all of this last decade while personal income growth has remained stagnant.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 10-10-2008, 10:19 AM:
 
Driving around yesterday I saw several stations as low as 2.579 in the north OKC/Edmond area.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-10-2008, 11:43 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
IMHO, the health care sector and higher education sectors are due for massive corrections too. Both industries have had runaway price inflation for all of this last decade while personal income growth has remained stagnant.
Higher education is for the most part a huge scam. They've made it imperative for people to get 4 year degrees or even 4 years plus graduate school to do jobs that you could do with 2 years or less of education. Even my degree as an electrical engineer. If I only focused on Math, Science and Engineering classes, I could have gotten my education in 2 1/2 years. I had to get "educated" for an extra 1 1/2 years so that I could take important classes like philosophy.

Health care costs are another story altogether. The costs keep going up and up but in many cases the net income of the health care providers (Doctors) has been dropping. A lot of the cost increase is either a direct or indirect result of frivilous lawsuits. The direct cost is increasing malpractice insurance premiums (getting so high that many obstetricians especially don't even carry insurance anymore). The indirect cost is overtesting of patients. This happens because if somebody sees a doctor and then ends up with a serious issue a few months later that "MAY" have been detectable on their visit, the Doctor will be sued becuase they "should have found it". All of these tests have to be paid for by the insurance companies and therefore everybody's costs go up.

Then you have things like "mental health equivilancy" being written into the financial bailout bill which will raise health care costs even more because now the insurance companies will have to cover overdiagnosed things like autism and ADD as if they were serious illnesses like heart disease or cancer.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-10-2008, 12:06 PM:
 
The causes, or who is to blame, doesn't make any difference whatsoever. The situation remains the same: unsustainable. The general public can only spend so much of its income on health care.

The various parties in the health care industrial complex (which includes various law firm businesses) can sit around pointing fingers at the other guy while they continually jack up their prices every year. They can keep on price gouging the general public until their "system" buckles and collapses under the weight of its own bullshit.

There will be a day of reckoning coming for that greedy industry and when the crash finally happens the results we'll see on Wall Street may be even more spectacular and scary than what what the inflation with housing and commodities industries has done. Health care is due for its own deflationary spiral.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-10-2008, 12:20 PM:
 
My health care proposal would be to offer cheap insurance that only insures against major expenses (long-term disease, surgury, etc) and then use tax free health reimbursment accounts to self insure for things like a sore throat or the flu or even pregnancy and birth. I can guarantee you that the vast majority of people could put 25% of what a health insurance plan costs into a HRA and be fine for all those little things and even prescriptions. Heck, most of the time after saving for a year you wouldn't have to contribute the full amount anymore. Then if you had a "major crisis only" insurance plan it would cost MUCH less and you'd probably end up cutting what the vast majority of people pay in health care costs by more than 50%.

This would also cut down on the people that run to the doctor every time they have the sniffles for 2 days because they only have to pay a $20 co-pay.
 
Posted by Brad Allen (Member # 470) on 10-10-2008, 10:23 PM:
 
$3.11 here today.
 
Posted by Robert Crabtree (Member # 4795) on 10-11-2008, 09:57 PM:
 
Down the street, I'm paying 3.33
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 10-12-2008, 02:16 AM:
 
$2.479 here in Edmond today.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-12-2008, 03:56 PM:
 
On Friday, gasoline prices here fell to $2.69 per gallon for 87 octane. Diesel prices are still pretty high, $3.69 per gallon, a full dollar above the 87 octane price.

Businesses have not been able to cut back on driving commercial vehicles nearly as much as individual people. Companies, like the one where I work, have to keep its vehicles on the road regardless of the fuel prices. Because of that, fuel companies can continue charging a huge premium for diesel without worrying about the high prices killing demand.

Concern is being raised by the news media that falling gas prices will undermine efforts to develop alternative energy sources and reduce the nation's dependence on imported oil. I think some of those concerns are unfounded.

The run up in gasoline prices to record levels caused a great deal of demand destruction. The area in Oklahoma where I live was deeply into the big truck and big SUV craze. I don't see very many of those vehicles on the roads anymore around here. People around here used to make fun of the Toyota Prius as a symbol of being wimpy. Once gasoline ran past the $3 and $4 per gallon levels, a lot of those same people swallowed their pride and started driving one, or some other kind of small car.

Everyone also knows these falling fuel prices may be a very temporary thing. Lots of speculators and hedge funds have been wiped out by the turmoil on Wall Street, but those same guys are going to return and try their best to drive futures prices up to record levels all over again. OPEC is supposed to have an "emergency meeting" sometime in November. They'll probably reduce oil output in an attempt to get oil back to $100 per barrel.

I'm not sure how much good that will do. Americans are gradually making big changes in their lifestyles. Lots of "McMansions" are sitting unsold in distant exhurbs of major cities while mixed use "lifestyle centers" are leading a resurgence of city centers.
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 10-12-2008, 05:26 PM:
 
Gas prices dropped to under $4.00 a week ago for regular unleaded at $3.99 and in a few days was ten cents cheaper here in Honolulu. At the way the things are going, I expect prices should settle at about $3.45 before the holidays if crude oil prices keep dropping.

-Claude
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 10-12-2008, 06:05 PM:
 
$2.79 at a few, 2.95+- at the rest.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-13-2008, 09:49 AM:
 
Monday morning, another price drop. $2.59 per gallon for 87 octane. Diesel is still $3.69 per gallon.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-13-2008, 11:56 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Concern is being raised by the news media that falling gas prices will undermine efforts to develop alternative energy sources and reduce the nation's dependence on imported oil. I think some of those concerns are unfounded.

The run up in gasoline prices to record levels caused a great deal of demand destruction. The area in Oklahoma where I live was deeply into the big truck and big SUV craze. I don't see very many of those vehicles on the roads anymore around here. People around here used to make fun of the Toyota Prius as a symbol of being wimpy. Once gasoline ran past the $3 and $4 per gallon levels, a lot of those same people swallowed their pride and started driving one, or some other kind of small car.

The bigger concern should be trying to develop viable alternative energy sources instead of energy negative and food price increasing sources like corn based ethanol. In addition to using wind and solar power where it makes sense (although enormous amounts of energy are used to make the turbine blades), the biggest push should be to try and increase the use of Nuclear Power. The waste situation can be dealt with. It would be viable to try and get to something in the 5-10 year timeframe like 40% nuclear, 20% green energy (wind/solar/etc), 30% coal (using clean coal technology), 10% natural gas. Then we can use natural gas as a common automobile fuel to replace a lot of the gasoline/diesel consumption.

A solution such as that one will buy us the time to develop a viable biofuel or other alternative for automobile fuel. Viable means that enough of it can be produced on a reasonable amount of land so as not to effect food production. Viable also means that you get much more energy out of the fuel than it took to produce it (since you will have to use some other energy source to produce it).

There is no question that the price shock at the pump has caused people to stop buying huge trucks and SUVs that they don't need. Consumer reaction combined with the CAFE standards increase will make sure the trend doesn't reverse even if prices drop back to the $2.50 - $3.00 range for the medium term.

We're probably getting pretty close to maximizing fuel efficiency of vehicles without major and expensive solutions like using exotic materials. Hybrids are great to improve stop and go efficiency but at some point physics kicks in. Weight and Aerodynamics are the main factors that determine efficiency (weight is the big problem with stop and go, aerodynamics combined with weight for highway). The theoretical maximum efficiency of a gasoline ICE is 25% which is not practically achieveable. Modern engines are 22%+ efficient so there's not much room for improvement there. Unless a radical engine technology (like the six-stroke water injection) is able to be produced practically, there's not much more milage to gain with engine technology alone.

The problem is that if you start making economy cars out of aluminum and carbon fibre composites you're going to end up with a $30,000 honda civic.

Anyway, back to topic, the best I've seen near me in the last week or so is $3.39.
 
Posted by Louis Belloisy (Member # 3836) on 10-13-2008, 12:54 PM:
 
in connecticut, 87 octane is running an average of 3.50.
we have been mandated to add alcohol to the gas, by 10% and that caused the gas mileage to drop about 20 percent. the state can fight it, but they would loose a lot of tax revenue. here in connecticut, its all about how much can the state make off of its citizens.

Louis
 
Posted by Paul Goulet (Member # 297) on 10-13-2008, 01:20 PM:
 
www.wlne.com

Low Gas Prices Lead to Fights, Arrest
Bryan Monaghan

It's no secret gas prices are falling fast across the region. As some stations begin to sink below the $3 mark, the rush to find those low, low prices can lead to long lines, and short tempers.

One particular gas station in Providence was the scene of long lines at the pump, and a fight involving shouting, a knife, and an attack with a hatchet.
 
Posted by Julie Lucero (Member # 4959) on 10-13-2008, 01:39 PM:
 
Still around $3.50/gallon for 87 octane here in the Santa Clarita area.
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 10-13-2008, 04:06 PM:
 
Bobby, the whole "green" nonsense will ensure that alternative fuels keep a-comin'. Everyone wants to be "green", oh so "green". God damn I hate the term "green". It's so stupid that it makes me want to set a bunch of tires on fire. Although I do believe we need better sources of fuel and energy, I do not believe humans contribute to global warming in a way which features any significance. Remember the impending ice age of '73, also rumored to be caused by humans? Now they're saying we're heating it up by doing the same exact thing? Yeah, everything that happens on this planet is our fault.

So go ahead and drive your SUV if you like it and don't mind paying for gas to keep it running. Don't feel guilty about it!
 
Posted by Joe Tommassello (Member # 4632) on 10-13-2008, 04:28 PM:
 
Under $3 now in Jersey. Gentlemen...start your engines!
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 10-15-2008, 08:43 AM:
 
Prices range from $2.83 and $3.09 here in northern New Jersey for good quality gasoline.
 
Posted by Mike Heenan (Member # 392) on 10-15-2008, 09:25 AM:
 
I just returned from a trip to the Miami area where everything was around 3.40 or so for regular. We took a day trip down to Key West and I was really surprised to see 2 stations selling for 2.97 a gallon, while the rest of them were at the normal rate, 3.40 or so.
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 10-17-2008, 10:47 AM:
 
Filled up this morning for $2.77/gallon full serve. Self serve is illegal in NJ.
 
Posted by James. R. Deeter (Member # 837) on 10-17-2008, 10:52 AM:
 
The greater Kansas City area is around 2.46 on the Missouri side and 2.68 on the Kansas side
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-17-2008, 12:36 PM:
 
$2.999 here - the state low is around $2.92, depending on where you look.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-17-2008, 12:47 PM:
 
quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
Self serve is illegal in NJ.

Oregon's the same way - no self serve. Wonder why no self serve options?
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 10-17-2008, 12:54 PM:
 
Low here is $2.95 today.

In Oregon self-serve is illegal. Every time someone in the state legislature introduces a bill to make it legal, people start howling about gas attendants losing their jobs, senior citizens being forced out of their cars in the rain to handle dirty unwieldy gas nozzles, and my favorite, that things will blow up if untrained ameteurs are allowed anywhere near a gas pump.

Commercial vehicles are allowed to use self-serve at special "cardlock" gas stations. "Commercial" seems to be defined broadly enough that a salesman with a Century 21 Real Estate sticker on his car door can get a cardlock pass.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 10-17-2008, 01:45 PM:
 
Now down to $2.399 here. Wish I had a few 50 gallon drums store some when when the prices start going back up.
 
Posted by Matthew Taylor (Member # 2310) on 10-17-2008, 02:01 PM:
 
Here in the UK it costs the equivalent of around $7 for a gallon!

It's about £1.18 per litre.
 
Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 10-17-2008, 02:07 PM:
 
Every time someone in the state legislature introduces a bill to make it legal, people start howling about gas attendants losing their jobs, senior citizens being forced out of their cars in the rain to handle dirty unwieldy gas nozzles, and my favorite, that things will blow up if untrained ameteurs are allowed anywhere near a gas pump.

Same here in NJ. The fact that people can pump their own gas in the other 48 states without causing mass death and destruction does not seem to influence them.
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 10-17-2008, 03:14 PM:
 
quote: Jeremy Weigel
Now down to $2.399 here. Wish I had a few 50 gallon drums store some when when the prices start going back up.

Just don't store it in your home

Gas hoarding eyed as cause of Dartmouth apartment fire
June 06, 2008 6:00 AM
DARTMOUTH — A couple tried to beat the high cost of gasoline by hoarding it in their apartment, but the plan backfired when fumes ignited, causing a fire that displaced residents from eight units in the complex, officials said.

Wednesday's blaze at Ledgewood Commons, fueled by the gas stored in a utility closet, was quickly extinguished by firefighters. However, the incident had the potential for disaster.

"If it had not been for the sprinklers, this building would have probably burnt to the ground," said Jennifer Mieth, a spokeswoman for state Fire Marshal Stephen D. Coan.

A husband and wife living in a second-floor unit at the North Dartmouth apartment complex off Faunce Corner Road kept an estimated 45 gallons in nine plastic jugs, Dartmouth's District 3 Fire Chief Richard Arruda said.

The jugs were covered by cloth rags and stacked in a hallway closet that housed the air conditioning system, Chief Arruda said.

An investigation suggested they were hoarding the gas in response to skyrocketing prices...
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-17-2008, 03:38 PM:
 
I remember when we had the option of self-serve or full-serve here. The full-serve islands were always deserted.

I notice the gas stations in OR and NJ aren't particularly higher-priced than the neighboring states, despite having to hire people to pump the gas. Here, there was always about a 20¢ per gallon difference between full and self, "to pay the employee to pump it for you."

Personally I would like to have the option back, especially when it's below freezing!
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-17-2008, 04:19 PM:
 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I notice the gas stations in OR and NJ aren't particularly higher-priced than the neighboring states, despite having to hire people to pump the gas. Here, there was always about a 20¢ per gallon difference between full and self, "to pay the employee to pump it for you."
The reason for that, at least in NJ is lower gas taxes. They keep the taxes low to take away the argument that the full service is making it more expensive.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-17-2008, 09:42 PM:
 
quote: Jeremy Weigel
Wish I had a few 50 gallon drums store some when when the prices start going back up.
Gasoline begins to go stale after roughly a month. This is one reason why oils that are mixed with fuel for 2 stroke engines have fuel stabilizers in them.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-17-2008, 11:07 PM:
 
Our new service van runs on Natural Gas or Gasoline... Natural Gas here is .875 a gallon so you can guess what I'm running it on. I read somewhere that it's equivelent to 130 octane gasoline but I'm doubting that. I have to say that on Natural Gas it does run so smooth you don't even know it's running... switch it to Gasoline and there's a bit of roughness to the idle.

Mark
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-19-2008, 09:20 PM:
 
87 octane here in Lawton was $2.53 per gallon on Friday. On Saturday the price dropped to $2.49. Today, the price dropped down to $2.41 per gallon.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-19-2008, 11:40 PM:
 
Still $2.899 here; Montana has a high gas tax (to supplement our lack of a sales tax, I guess) so that could be at least part of the reason. It's dropped about $1.30 in the last 2 months, so I guess there's something good about the "economic meltdown!" [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-20-2008, 09:29 AM:
 
This morning I was surprised to see another price drop. 87 octane gasoline is selling for $2.33 per gallon. Diesel is $3.49 per gallon.
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 10-20-2008, 10:21 PM:
 
With the continued fall in the price of crude, I'm waiting the price at the pump will fall in line accordingly.

Currently at $2.59 here this am. Hope to see it fall and level around $2.25.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-20-2008, 10:52 PM:
 
Hell, I'd like to see the price dip below $2.00 again.

I filled up my pickup truck today for about $46. Back in July the cost was close to $80.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-21-2008, 02:16 AM:
 
...sad, and we're still above 3 bucks - $3.249 .. that's just plain highway robbery to be that high in this state.

But, as we've read and heard in the news: Even though fuel prices are going down, is America going to go back to it's gas guzzling days, or have we learned a hard lesson to prepare ourselves in case this falling price of oil is just another "calm before the storm" situation?
 
Posted by Justin Hamaker (Member # 2165) on 10-21-2008, 02:28 AM:
 
Driving home from work tonight I noticed the cheapest station in town is down to $3.19. That's down something like 14¢ in the last 2-3 days.
 
Posted by Tim Asten (Member # 4051) on 10-21-2008, 04:51 AM:
 
Petrol prices are dropping here too due to the recession we are all in. The cheapest I have seen locally was £1 a litre ($6.32 per U.S gallon). I heard that OPEC want to cut oil production to force the prices back up.. Scumbags. [Mad]

Tim.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-21-2008, 10:12 AM:
 
Another small drop in price here. $2.31 per gallon for 87 octane.

Just to put that in perspective, in January of 2003 the price for 87 octane here was $1.32 per gallon.

quote: Monte L Fullmer
Even though fuel prices are going down, is America going to go back to it's gas guzzling days, or have we learned a hard lesson to prepare ourselves in case this falling price of oil is just another "calm before the storm" situation?
I believe the "demand destruction" is permanent. Americans love to drive. But they are no longer in love with gas guzzling vehicles that cost a fortune to keep on the road. GM, Ford and Chrysler being on the brink of ruin confirms that paradigm shift in vehicle preference. Even with fuel costing under $2.50 here, it still adds up to a pretty high cost when it comes to filling up a king cab truck or SUV.

These violent market corrections are only now hitting the fuel and commodities markets after laying waste to the housing industry. I'm rooting for similar corrections to drop kick the hell out of the higher education industry and health care industry. Those two industries have seen runaway cost inflation go unabated for nearly 2 decades despite stagnant income growth. Plain, simple math does not equal them being able to continue with that greedy nonsense.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-21-2008, 11:17 AM:
 
In addition to Bobby's comment about demand destruction, the increased CAFE standards will also help to ensure we don't go back to the gas guzzling days.

Hopefully, with the next administration (whoever it is), some sane energy policy will be developed to help us be less dependent on OPEC.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-21-2008, 12:45 PM:
 
And chiming along within this vein - all the times I drive by used car lots, it amazing, yet sad, to see these lots loaded heavilly with trucks and SUV's that you know that will be sitting there for quite the time - to the point that eventually they'll be just given away due to the lack of demand for such items.

Then, the ones that do own these vehicles, you can see the grimmace on their faces knowing that their guzzlers have lost tons of value where they will never get out of them what they paid for if they did a trade-in of sorts.

Thus, knowing that they're stuck with these vehicles as if chained to them for life.

I've always driven 4 cylinder econobox vehicles knowing that some day, like when it was back in the embargo days, these little cars do hold their weight in gold.

-Monte

-Monte
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 10-22-2008, 01:04 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Hell, I'd like to see the price dip below $2.00 again.
At the current pace in price reduction we could see it below $2.00 here by next week. 87 Octane is down to $2.179 a $.22 drop in less than a week.
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-22-2008, 08:22 AM:
 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I'm rooting for similar corrections to drop kick the hell out of the higher education industry and health care industry. Those two industries have seen runaway cost inflation go unabated for nearly 2 decades despite stagnant income growth. Plain, simple math does not equal them being able to continue with that greedy nonsense.
The problem with bringing down the cost of either of these two "products" is the politicians. In both cases, politicians talk about making healthcare and college affordable. Unfortunately, they don't mean bring down the cost charged by providers. What they mean is to have the government (i.e. the "rich" people) subsidize healtcare and college for the "middle class". Thus, the "rich" people (who in reality are upper middle class and not rich) get to keep paying the high prices while college proffesors continue to earn 6 figure salaries to teach a couple of hours a day and then do "research".
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-22-2008, 09:43 AM:
 
Those issues make little difference from the view point of the paying customers. The math situation is unchanged. The general public is getting price gouged to the breaking point. Pretty soon too many people will simply not be able to afford college or health care at all. They will just do without. There is already evidence of this showing up in drug industry sales. Edit: this morning Merck announced it will cut 7200 jobs after net income dropped 28% due to competition from generic drugs.

When the customer base collapses those pseudo-socialized, "for profit," "private" industries will fall on their face. In the case of many health care sectors, such as the pharmaceutical industry, the share holders will take a bath. And just like so many investors who took it in the shorts with this housing industry collapse, they can see see this crash coming years in advance too. I guess the name of the game is staying on the gravy train long enough to milk as much profit as possible out of it and then pick the right time to jump off before the gravy train jumps the tracks.

Hospitals and universities get by with a tremendous amount of tax dollars, but they still need plenty of paying customers coming in through the doors to maintain positive cash flow. Within the next 10 years both industries are going to find themselves in one hell of a hole regardless of the shenanigans government officials are doing to help them survive. The American public has only so much money to give to these scoundrels.

In lighter news, 87 octane gasoline dropped to $2.29 per gallon here in Lawton this morning.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-26-2008, 09:32 PM:
 
Another weekend. Another good round of price cuts on gasoline here in Lawton.

On Friday, the price dropped to $2.16 per gallon. On Saturday, it fell to $2.09 per gallon -and $2.06 at some stations.

Today, the price actually dropped below the $2.00 level. At most stations in town the price is now $1.97 per gallon. I thought it would be sometime in November (or perhaps never) before we saw prices relatively that low again.

Remember a little more than just a couple of years ago when we all though gasoline rising above $2.00 per gallon was outrageous?
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-26-2008, 09:57 PM:
 
I'm still paying just .875 for natural gas here in Utah... its 2.05 in Evanston, WY and goes a little higher the farther you head east, up to 2.259 in Cheyenne, WY. Gas was cheapest in Evanston, WY at 2.669 a gallon for no lead. The amazing thing about running on natural gas is that the engine oil never gets dirty!

Mark
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-26-2008, 10:10 PM:
 
Wow! W. Idaho FINALLY got below 3bucks this wknd. Down to 2.91/gal..

and at Albertson's with their 3cent incentive nonsense card that you gotta swipe in the machine before fueling, drops down to 2.88/gal.

Gee, buck/97 in OKA ... haven't seen that price since 2005 ..

True LPG fuels keeps oil clean ...

(cool, 4k posts now....)

-Monte
 
Posted by Lyle Romer (Member # 1266) on 10-26-2008, 11:18 PM:
 
quote:
I'm still paying just .875 for natural gas here in Utah... its 2.05 in Evanston, WY and goes a little higher the farther you head east, up to 2.259 in Cheyenne, WY. Gas was cheapest in Evanston, WY at 2.669 a gallon for no lead. The amazing thing about running on natural gas is that the engine oil never gets dirty!
How does the MPG compare between Natural Gas and Gasoline?
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-27-2008, 11:11 PM:
 
A little over 5lbs of Natural Gas to one gallon of gasoline, but Natural Gas is also 130 octane equivelent! The milage one gets all depends on how you drive really but is quite close to gasoline milage... The new van has a large V-8 in it and is not quite broken in yet... only about 7500 miles so far. I will say that the smoothness of the engine running on Natural Gas vs. Gasoline(85 octane) is far far smoother. The Gas conversion also did not parlay the GM warranty as it is a Certified Conversion and there is a complete second set of injectors for the Natural Gas system. Everything is automatic... The van starts on gasoline and as it warms up automatically switches to Natural Gas. If you run out of Natural Gas it then automatically switches back over to Gasoline. you never even know it except for the warning beeper at switch over. The downside is that the 3500 psi/22 gallon equivelent tank takes up quite a bit of room in the back... The tank is spun Kevlar and never has to be hydroed during its 20 year lifespan, there is a diamond plate metal box over it for safety just in case my TEK 465 might happen to fall down on it. This vehicle makes much more sense than the bogus "Flex Fuel" vehicles some of the car makers are selling.

Mark
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 10-28-2008, 06:20 PM:
 
$2.439 at Costco. (deduct an additional 2% for using American Express) Louis
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-28-2008, 06:23 PM:
 
Our local Sam's Club has 87 octane priced at $1.92 per gallon. It's still $1.97 at most gas stations. Diesel is still priced above $3 per gallon -$3.15 to be exact.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-28-2008, 08:19 PM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
just in case my TEK 465 might happen to fall down on it
True, you don't want to drop that 20 plus pounds of O-scope on that tank. Send you to the moon if that ever went...

quote: Bobby Henderson
$1.92 per gallon
..and we're a buck more up here in Idaho... just insane...
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-28-2008, 09:50 PM:
 
$2.579 here now - it went down 12¢ 2 days ago. I'm hoping for $2 but will believe that when I see it.
 
Posted by Christian Volpi (Member # 2370) on 10-29-2008, 12:58 PM:
 
I saw $2.089 is morning. It's a few cents cheaper if I cross the state line into Missouri. Diesel is also below $3 for the first time in a long time at $2.999. I bet Chrysler is happy.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 10-29-2008, 01:16 PM:
 
Chrysler, and anyone else with a dependence on diesel vehicle sales, is not going to be happy until diesel is priced below the other unleaded grades of gasoline again.

I'm having trouble remembering when diesel was cheaper than 87 octane unleaded. It's been at least a couple of years since that was the case.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-29-2008, 02:11 PM:
 
..and the truckers remember that as well when diesel was tons cheaper than regular fuel.

Why GM went into that diesel craze in the early 80's converting their 350's over to diesel yet not modifying the motors correctly for diesel usage.. major cam problems were the starters.

...and could they leave a trail of coal behind them!

..and of course, the import diesel versions were good little motors.

Domestic automaking back then wasn't much to brag about...and I still wonder about that to this day.

-Monte
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 10-29-2008, 03:39 PM:
 
Before I posted my last comment on this subject on October 12th, gas prices here in Hawaii had just dropped to under $4.00 at $3.99. Due to the very slow pace of fluctuating gas prices here in the islands up until that time, I predicted a gallon of gas in Hawaii would be around $3.35 by the holidays. I was wrong because it is already down to $3.29 at a few stations around here. At the way things are going, I would not be surprised if prices drop to about $2.40 or less by the holidays for a gallon of regular unleaded. [Smile]

-Claude
 
Posted by Christian Volpi (Member # 2370) on 11-02-2008, 10:03 AM:
 
I saw $1.91 in KCMO yesterday. When I mentioned that Chrysler is probably happy, I was referring to the promotion they had where they gauranteed $2.99 gas for 3 years, as long as it's less than that amount, they don't have to pay the difference.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 11-02-2008, 10:12 AM:
 
$1.98 in Lexington/Versailles Ky and along I-64 to Louisville on Sat night. Hi, Tim! Louis
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-02-2008, 08:17 PM:
 
Now with OPEC doing the production reduction, I can see barrel pricing staying between 60 to 75 bucks/barrel.

Thus, it would be safe to say that domestic fuel prices are going to stay in this 2 to 3 dollar range.

Guess, we'd better plan on the different driving habits that we started with to be the norm.

-Monte
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 11-02-2008, 08:40 PM:
 
I'm sure their goal is to make us forget about "alternative" energies like all the other times. "It worked then!"

This time, I don't think so. $4/4.50 a gallon is enough to get our (political) attention. Louis
 
Posted by Brad Allen (Member # 470) on 11-05-2008, 09:19 PM:
 
$1.96 in Evansville today.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-05-2008, 09:49 PM:
 
$2.259 here now. I'm liking these 10 and 12-cent drops.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-05-2008, 10:22 PM:
 
The price here is hovering at $1.97. Diesel finally fell below $3.00 per gallon -currently it costs $2.95.

Lowest gasoline prices in Oklahoma right now reportedly are in Bartlesville: $1.83 per gallon.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-05-2008, 11:14 PM:
 
but, "wow" did gold take a huge dump - over 200 bucks down to be in the 700 buck range or troy ounce.
 
Posted by Ron Curran (Member # 3631) on 11-06-2008, 08:59 PM:
 
It has probably been mentioned before but Downunder we don't fill our vehicles with gas. We use a liquid. Gas would be cheaper.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 11-07-2008, 01:25 AM:
 
Filled up for $1.819/gallon tonight here in Edmond.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-11-2008, 09:27 PM:
 
87 octane gasoline is averaging $1.82 per gallon in Lawton. Diesel is running $2.79 per gallon. Crude oil closed under $60 per barrel today, hitting a 20 month low.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-11-2008, 09:33 PM:
 
still, not fair. Bobby's close to all them oil wells...
 
Posted by Rachel Craven (Member # 1016) on 11-11-2008, 10:02 PM:
 
Cheapest one I've seen around here is $2.22/gal, most are at around $2.28/gal. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 11-12-2008, 08:51 AM:
 
I still can't figure out why diesel is so much more expensive?! For YEARS, it was always cheaper than gasoline! [Mad]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-12-2008, 09:15 AM:
 
Joe Six-pack can cut back on his driving. Commercial businesses that keep a lot of diesel trucks on the roads cannot cut back on driving so easily. It's easier to bend a business over the barrel than some average guy who can take the bus to work instead.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-12-2008, 09:27 AM:
 
Commercial businesses can do something Joe Sixpack can't, though -- they can add "fuel surcharges" to their invoices. Many companies we deal with are doing this.

UPS puts out a newsletter in which they claim they have saved miillions of gallons of gas by eliminating many left turns from their routes. The drivers aren't burning up fuel waiting for traffic to clear; it's cheaper to turn right and take a different route.
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 11-12-2008, 11:45 AM:
 
Fuel surcharges are a load of crap. If it's not optional, then it is part of the price of the item (or the shipping charge) and should be included in its price.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-12-2008, 12:01 PM:
 
What I remember why diesel is higher that gasoline is that the demand isn't that high compared to the other.

Granted, it doesn't take as much refining for diesel, but it suddenly turned into a supply and demand thing..prob due to the sudden increase of cars on the road that tipped the price scale over to make diesel the more expensive fuel.
 
Posted by Joe Tommassello (Member # 4632) on 11-12-2008, 01:19 PM:
 
Saw $1.97 in Trenton NJ on Sunday.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 11-12-2008, 02:25 PM:
 
A 42 gal. barrel of crude yields 19 gal. of gasoline and only 9 gal. of #2 diesel.
 
Posted by Frank Jerkic (Member # 2446) on 11-15-2008, 01:33 AM:
 
Well Diesel has finally dropped from $1.76 a litre to $1.35 over the past 2 weeks and petrol for the chesse and kisses car has now dropped to $1.27 a litre for the 96% octane 10% ethanol blend normal unleaded is at $1.33 in our area
Frank
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 11-15-2008, 02:24 AM:
 
Down to $1.719 on the outskirts of the Edmond area.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-15-2008, 09:21 AM:
 
Still comparatively high here - $1.999 but I'm glad to see it below $2 again. Never thought I'd see that in my lifetime.
 
Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 11-15-2008, 12:37 PM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
What I remember why diesel is higher that gasoline is that the demand isn't that high compared to the other.

I've heard quite the opposite...the worldwide demand of diesel fuel has increased mainly as a result of growth in newly industrialized nations, without much of an increase in production to keep prices in check.

At least that's what the claim was about a year ago. With the worldwide financial situation circling the drain, growth may be less of a factor these days.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-19-2008, 11:53 PM:
 
Crude oil is currently trading below $53 per barrel.

The price of 87 octane gasoline here in Lawton dropped to $1.74 per gallon at most stations. The gas station at Sam's Club knocks another 3¢ off the price.
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 11-20-2008, 12:31 AM:
 
Filled up for $1.659 tonight in northwest OKC.
 
Posted by James. R. Deeter (Member # 837) on 11-20-2008, 02:36 PM:
 
Independance MO $ 1.43
 
Posted by Jeremy Weigel (Member # 4208) on 11-20-2008, 05:25 PM:
 
Driving around south OKC today I came across a Shell station that was selling 87 octane for $1.569 .
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-20-2008, 06:35 PM:
 
$1.959 here as of yesterday.

So anyone willing to make any predictions on how low it will go before it starts going up again? I never expected to see sub-$2 gas again in my lifetime.
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 11-20-2008, 06:58 PM:
 
Oil overnight went down to $48 a barrel. Not that long ago it was at $150+ per barrel!

Over here that saving has been offset by a significant drop in the Aussie dollar. At our highest we got up to around $1.60 per litre. Even with that drop we are now only at $1.23 per litre. Although the other day I saw E10 (10% ethanol blend) for as low as $1.04 per litre. 2 days later it had gone up 18cents per litre. For some unknown reason, we have a weekly 'cycle' here. Price hits a high Wednesday midday and goes down to its lowest Tuesday then up it goes again. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Claude S. Ayakawa (Member # 1401) on 11-20-2008, 07:01 PM:
 
You guys got it made. It is still above $2.00 here in Hawaii at $2.79 for a gallon of regular unleaded. If it does dip below $2.00, it will not happen for another month and a half.

-Claude
 
Posted by Charles Greenlee (Member # 3856) on 11-20-2008, 07:49 PM:
 
Saw $1.77.9 at a station just down the road. Yay. I hope they keep falling.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-21-2008, 12:34 AM:
 
quote:
Oil overnight went down to $48 a barrel. Not that long ago it was at $150+ per barrel!
True (to be exact, the record was $147 per barrel). OTOH, it was back in 2004 when crude oil had traded above $50 per barrel for the first time ever. 4 years is a bigger span of time than 4 months, but 2004 is still fairly recent history.

BTW, 87 octane gasoline dropped to $1.71 per gallon today here in Lawton. Diesel is still commanding a near $1 premium ($2.69 per gallon).
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 11-21-2008, 09:56 AM:
 
This morning news people said the average in Houston is $1.81 per gallon whereas the national is $1.88
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-21-2008, 12:55 PM:
 
Another price drop today in Lawton. 87 octane is selling for $1.67 per gallon. I wonder if we'll see prices in the $1.59 and lower range by this weekend.
 
Posted by Sam Graham (Member # 2889) on 11-21-2008, 10:29 PM:
 
7:20am: Drive by QuikTrip, where gas is selling for $1.69.
7:40am: Drive by QuikTrip, and gas is selling for $1.67.
11:05am: Drive by QuikTrip, and gas is selling for $1.65.
4:00pm: Drive by QuikTrip, and gas is selling for $1.63.

I suppose we'll get a Thanksgiving bump next week though.
 
Posted by Kurt Zupin (Member # 2751) on 11-22-2008, 12:47 AM:
 
On my way to work I drive by the same gas station, Its been droping by 2 cents every day for the past couple of weeks. I drive by it today to come to work and it has droped 16 cents to $1.99. Thats the average here right now, although a few places are at $1.90 I honestly never thought I would see the day when gas was -$2 a gallon ever again
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-22-2008, 09:41 AM:
 
I think it's kind of funny -- everyone has been screaming about using less gas for years, and finally the gas got so high that people were forced to adapt so they really WOULD use less gas. So now the oil companies are lowering the price to get people to use MORE, but people feel good about having changed their ways and saving the planet, plus they can't afford to go anywhere anyway due to everything being more expensive, so now they're perfectly happy using less gas. I know I'm walking more now (and enjoying it).
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-22-2008, 10:18 AM:
 
The run up of oil to $147 per barrel had little to do with demand. More stock market experts are finally owning up to that. The pyramid scheme of speculation in housing was beginning to implode over 3 years ago when oil started to see the big increase. That's no coincidence. A huge amount of the money made in housing got rolled over into commodities like oil. The commodities markets were seen as a haven to protect all that wealth.

Growth in China and India justifiably ran oil prices over $50 and $60 per barrel. From 2004-2008 we saw oil prices triple. The world's population or level of oil use did not triple during that time. Likewise, the oil bust taking place now has removed $100 off the price of oil in just four months. Demand for oil has been dropping for many months now, but only in incremental, small levels.

Oil's run up to $147 was all because of a speculative bubble. It will be difficult for oil to reach those highs again anytime soon. People have indeed changed their driving habits and changed the kinds of vehicles they drive. Insanely high prices caused quite a bit of demand destruction.

I'm just hoping the stock market can truly establish a real bottom and start working out of the that 7500-8500 point range. Many stocks are very oversold to ridiculously low levels. Some real money making opportunity is out there waiting to be had.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 11-22-2008, 12:32 PM:
 
This thread has now gone full circle... Gas prices are back down to what they were at the start of the thread....
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-22-2008, 01:05 PM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
This thread has now gone full circle...
Like the "StarWars" series...

Now, as with "StarWars". time for episodes VII,VIII and IX with this fuel story..

People got complacent within their insecurities of needing gas guzzling road locomotives to protect them from harm along with loving having their living rooms on four wheels since fuel was cheap. But now, having the horrible and rude awakeing on having such commodies that it suddenly became a costly liability in their economical "bubble" with the sting of reality that was massively painful.

Now, with fuel gradually returning to the pre-pain levels, do you think that folks want to experience that economical pain again when our Middle East friends gets another infestation, when that time does occur, to shoot oil prices back up to insane levels?

This time, I do believe this and our next generation will be more better aware and prepared for this approaching outcome.

Detroit needs to suck it up, get those "chips" off their shoulders and get to the drawing boards to desgn and make the "green" vehicles that this country really needs..and for their survival.

-Monte
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 11-22-2008, 05:07 PM:
 
I'm not so sure the automakers in Detroit are even going to survive long enough to get a new generation of fuel-conscious vehicles onto the roads. The cost of their operations is burning through so much cash the end of their life span may be only a few months, or in the case of GM a few more weeks.

Ask any average person on the street to name some defunct investment banking firms and few will be able to conjure up names like Bear Sterns or Lehman Brothers. They might know the name "AIG" but not be able to explain what the company does.

Everyone knows brand names like Chevrolet, Cadillac, Ford, GMC, Dodge, etc. Those trademarks are household names that have existed for decades. If or when they vanish it will have a very chilling effect on the psychology of this economy. There's the specter losing millions of jobs attached directly to those industries. The death of several major American brand names may cause a paranoid drop in consumer spending and lead to even more job losses. 70% of our economy is driven by consumer spending.

High fuel prices ruined part of the love affair Americans have had with driving cars. With no more American car industry the country's car culture would be even further diminished. Asian and European auto makers are not going to sell very many cars to Americans if Americans don't have quite so much enthusiasm about them anymore.

BTW, 87 octane gasoline dropped to $1.59 per gallon here in Lawton today.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 11-22-2008, 07:16 PM:
 
$1.649 at Costco in Louisville, tonight. We're "reformulated" so it's all Ashland gas, the only source in the East no matter what station you go to. Gas is bartered. Louis
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 11-22-2008, 09:40 PM:
 
Today $1.47
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-22-2008, 11:24 PM:
 
Wow..we finally dropped below the two buck mark here in Nampa. $1.95 at our local Costco store. Conv. stores finally hit $1.99 ...

..sickening to hear less than a buck and a half a gallon in the Mississippi/Midwest area..
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 11-23-2008, 08:55 PM:
 
That $1.47 place was $1.69 today
 
Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 11-23-2008, 10:15 PM:
 
Costco $1.75 today. There are quite a few places around town under $2 now.
 
Posted by Rachel Craven (Member # 1016) on 11-23-2008, 11:52 PM:
 
Lowest I could find today was $1.89
 
Posted by Brad Allen (Member # 470) on 11-24-2008, 04:29 PM:
 
Pilot station at I-64 and Highway 41 North of Evansville.
Nov 23rd 3pm price 1.52.
Nov 23rd 9Pm same station as above $1.56
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2