quote:

---

Warner Bros Wants Zemeckis For 'Wizard Of Oz' Remake Based On Original MGM Script
By MIKE FLEMING | Tuesday November 16, 2010 @ 6:59pm EST

Whenever you remake a revered Hollywood film, there’s bound to be controversy, but going right to the original material is certainly an interesting approach. Warner Bros is in early talks with Robert Zemeckis to direct a live-action remake of the The Wizard of Oz and plans to use the original script from the 1939 classic. Warner Bros owns the screenplay because Ted Turner bought it along with the MGM library before Warner Bros bought Turner’s empire. This latest Oz twist comes as Disney is trying very hard to mount The Great And Powerful Oz. Sam Raimi is developing that film while he simultaneously develops World of Warcraft for Warner Bros and Legendary. Disney and Raimi want Robert Downey Jr as their star. The original Wizard of Oz script had a total of 19 writers (seems not much has changed in Hollywood) with many of them uncredited, including Bert Lahr who played the film’s Cowardly Lion. This wouldn’t be the first hugely high-profile remake for Zemeckis; he's in the middle of a Yellow Submarine animated redux for Disney, scheduled for a 2012 release. Also, after working for years in performance-capture animation, Zemeckis has been moving toward a return to a live-action films, attaching himself to Timeless also at Warner Bros.

---

quote:

---

EXCLUSIVE: Fresh off Disney's massive success with Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland," Warner Bros. wants to remake another childhood classic. Like, really classic.

The studio is examining two existing "Wizard of Oz" projects, with an eye toward giving one of them a modern gloss and moving it toward the screen.

One project, called "Oz," currently lives at Warner's New Line label. It's being produced by Temple Hill, which is behind a little franchise called "Twilight," and has a script written by Darren Lemke, a writer on the upcoming "Shrek Forever After."

A second "Wizard of Oz" project, set up at Warners proper, skews a little darker -- it's written by "A History of Violence" screenwriter Josh Olson and focuses on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil. "Clash of the Titans" producer Basil Iwanyk and his Thunder Road Pictures are behind that one. ("Spawn" creator Todd MacFarlane is potentially involved in a producerial capacity, to give you some idea of the tone.)

While the idea of a new "Wizard of Oz" movie is said to be in the development, let's-bat-this-around stage, it's been advanced seriously enough on the lot that representatives for some of the top directors around Hollywood have been briefed.

The Judy Garland-starring "The Wizard of Oz" from 1939 -- we could give you the refresher on witches, tin men, Dorothy and everyone else, but really, do we need to? -- has been given alternative treatments before. There was the 1978 black-themed film adaptation of the stage play "The Wiz." And of course about six years ago came the Broadway adaptation of Gregory Maguire's "Wicked," an alternative story of girls, witches and Emerald City politics. The property proved a huge stage hit, prompting a film version that's in development at Universal and "Wanted" producer Marc Platt.

Audiences are likely to respond to the idea of a new silver screen "Wizard of Oz" with gusto ("at least the first one was good," said one colleague we told) or with horror, precisely because the original is such a classic.

But for Warners, there's plenty of appeal in trying to take the story of Dorothy & Co. back to the big screen. For one, there's the bonkers $210 million global opening for "Alice," which shows that if you're trying to create a mega-blockbuster, one smart way to do it is to take a title people know and update it for the effects era. And there's a neat symmetry, since the Technicolor version of the classic film did for color in the movies what a lot of people say that "Avatar," "Alice" -- and now, perhaps, "Wizard" -- could do for 3-D in the movies.

With its Harry Potter series drawing to an end, Warners also likes the idea of a franchise, and "Wizard of Oz" and the many books L. Frank Baum wrote featuring many of the same characters (all of which are in the public domain) fit the bill nicely. And let's not forget the property's strong, young female protagonist, hugely in vogue now in the post -Twilight" and -"Alice" eras.

There could still be questions about the project's title (the book's "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" is in the public domain but the movie's "The Wizard of Oz" is not; it's owned by MGM, whose library is partly owned by Warner Bros.). And then there's the matter of whether filmmakers would make the movie with musical elements, as the original, of course, did. Those questions aside, it could be the moneymaking formula.

Follow the yellow brick road. It's strewn with CGI, tent poles and 3-D. And, of course, a little green.

---

quote: www.deadline.com

---

Also, after working for years in performance-capture animation, Zemeckis has been moving toward a return to a live-action films, attaching himself to Timeless also at Warner Bros

---

That's the best thing in that article.
 

---

Posted by Bruce Hansen (Member # 281) on 11-17-2010, 07:18 PM:
 
Yea, Hollywood. Never let common sence get in the way of greedy corporate profits. They will undoubtly let digital (crud) effects take over the film, putting the story in the background; or better yet, do it in 3D, and get rid of the story all together. Just give us a 2 hour long string of goofy 3D effects, we don't need a story line getting in the way.
 

---

Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 11-18-2010, 01:47 AM:
 
The next thing you know...they'll try to remake Miracle on 34th street!

Its a Wonderful Life would be another good candidate for a remake
 

---

Posted by Hillary Charles (Member # 769) on 11-18-2010, 07:22 AM:
 

quote: Steve Guttag

---

Its a Wonderful Life would be another good candidate for a remake

---

quote: John Wilson

---

That's the best thing in that article.

---

Its to bad that he has already come out and said that this report of him doing it is false. He will not touch it.
 

---

Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 11-18-2010, 10:05 AM:
 
It's clear that someone should remake Warner Brothers!
 

---

Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-18-2010, 10:09 AM:
 
They remade Miracle on 34th St theatrically in 1994: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110527/

And for tv in 1973 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070395/) and

1959 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307164/)

The deep warm memories we have of these remakes should serve notice( but won't) to anyone else looking to remake the "classics"
 

---

Posted by Jim Cassedy (Member # 4115) on 11-18-2010, 12:07 PM:
 
If they haven't cast Dorothy yet, we've got DOZENS of
Judy Garland impersonators here in San Francisco who
could audition for the part- - and probably do it well.
 

---

Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 751) on 11-18-2010, 12:11 PM:
 
Hollywood has been remaking films for as long as there has been a Hollywood. Some remakes are better than the original, most are not. I suspect that any theatrical remake of OZ will fail. A few years ago, the SyFy channel ran a mini-series "re-imagining" of OZ called Tin Man. It did not exactly burn up the ratings.

On the other hand, in 1931, WB make a private detective film called The Maltese Falcon, which was slow and boring. In 1941, WB remade The Maltese Falcon from a script that was almost word for word identical to the original, only this time it featured Humphrey Bogart, Peter Lorre, Sydney Greenstreet, and it was a big hit.
 

---

Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 11-18-2010, 02:07 PM:
 
I guess technically you could say that "The Wizard of Oz" from 1939 was a remake.
 

---

Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 11-18-2010, 03:09 PM:
 
There have been lots and lots of very successful remakes or "reboots" over the years.

Ten Commandments, Ben-Hur, Superman (the Christopher Reeve version), and so on. So they're not ALWAYS a bad thing.

Well except these days they usually are, I guess.

When was the last really good remake? Probably the last really good "reboot" was The Dark Knight, or the first James Bond with Daniel Craig.
 

---

Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 11-18-2010, 03:13 PM:
 
The last great remake I can think of was Richard Lester's version of The Three Musketeers. And that was 37 years ago.
 

---