Originally posted by Mark Lane
I have a counterindication that, if I wanted one, would likely enable me to get a doctor's letter exempting me from vaccination mandates (a past, and severe episode of Guillain-Barré Syndrome). I did quite a bit of reading up and asking medically qualified family and friends before deciding to be vaccinated anyways. What decided it was that (a) all the documented cases of GBS presenting in the immediate aftermath of covid vaccination that I could find documented online involved the AstraZeneca vax, and (b) my episode of GBS was not in response to a vaccination, but shortly after recovering from a campylobacter infection (which is the one of most common precursors to GBS). For those two reasons, I figured that as long as I didn't have the AZ vax (not an issue, because it isn't used in the USA), the risk of getting covid while unvaccinated was a lot greater than the risk of catastrophic side effects from the vax.
The point is, I made my own decision after doing my own research. I feel very uneasy about employers in particular forcing their staff to get the vax, some of whom won't have medically qualified family and friends to consult, and, at the risk of sounding elitist, would struggle to do their own research and draw evidence-based conclusions from it. They will be easily pressured into making a decision without fully understanding what might be bigger risks than they were with me.
Originally posted by Mitchell Dvoskin
My point is that with covid, we now appear to be imposing risk mitigation measures that are out of proportion to the threat, relative to the risk mitigation measures that we take, and tolerate, against other comparable threats.

Leave a comment: