Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE
Topic Closed  Topic Closed


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Censorship on Film-Tech (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Censorship on Film-Tech
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-26-2000 10:22 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Reading this, and the other thread that spawned it kind of brings up "issues" for me. Simply put, arguing and fighting among people makes me very uneasy.

Instead of talking about other people, I'm going to talk about myself. This way,I hope people will understand my point without taking personal offense.

Many people who know me (electronically AND personally) might say that I'm a non-stop talker and will often take an issue to "extremes" during a conversation. I might get off on a tangent or say things that people think are silly or strange. It's often hard to tell if I'm really serious, sometimes. From time to time, I say REALLY offensive things without thinking. It's not on purpose but other people don't know that. After a while, most people just say to themselves, "Oh! There goes Randy again.", and blow it off.

Problem is that talking on the internet is so "impersonal" that it's easy for me to say things without fear of criticism. One time, a while back, I said (on this forum) that some people who worked for a certain company might be "Dumb as rocks." To me, it was clearly a funny joke. I got a private response from a guy who worked for that company and he was not very happy! After listening to him I realized that there are some things I say that piss people off even if I don't mean it. I have to learn how to think twice before I say some things.

Since that time I try to make sure I say things clearly. Often, you will see me write things like, "correct me if I'm wrong", or "I understand <the subject> is/are...". It's my way of saying things in a way that won't make people think I'm attacking them. Of course I realize this is the "real world" and you can't live your entire life trying not to offend everyone. Some people just won't be satisfied no matter what you say. At least when somebody DOES get upset with me, I can be reasonably sure it's THEIR problem, not mine.

As far as ME being offended by something OTHER PEOPLE said on this forum... There has only been once. It was VERY minor. We "settled out-of-court", so to speak. The other person might not have known that I was upset.

Thanks for listening to me do the "12 Step" thing. (Hint) I hope I didn't come off as being too wishy-washy.
(And if you don't like it, GO TAKE A FLYING LEAP! )

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-26-2000 10:26 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I take offense at that.


John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-26-2000 10:52 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too bad he didn't work it out. He is a smart guy.

As "Father Kurt" says; "Ho-hum."

Richard C. Wolfe
Master Film Handler

Posts: 250
From: Northampton, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 05-26-2000 11:03 PM      Profile for Richard C. Wolfe   Author's Homepage   Email Richard C. Wolfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad:

I'm fairly new to your site, and have only posted several times. I do enjoy it very much and find in extremely informative. I was disapointed that the site about leaving a frame on the leader and tail was discontinued, as I had just completed reading all the listings and had wanted to make a comment. Yes, I agree...it had been beaten to death and was probably going nowhere at this point....but there was one thing that I found missing, unless I missed it somewhere (there was a lot to read). First though, before I get to that, let me inform you that I have been a projectionist for over thirty years and was trained by the union when it was required to serve a six month apprenticeship before taking the state exam. I was taught to leave one frame by them.
During the past week or so, while following this forum, I made it a point to contact all the old timers (projectionists) around here to see if anyone knew how to identify the proper leaders and tails to the proper reels using the soundtrack and film edge. Some of these guys have operated for up to sixty years and not one of them ever heard of your method. I think of myself as a good projectionist, and have trained many others over the years myself. Now I wonder how I missed this. No one ever taught me, so I couldn't teach anyone else your secret. If you are the worlds greatest projectionist as you seem to want us to believe, and are truly concerned about how film is handled and presented....and realize that virtually none of us have had the proper training to be able to identify the correct leaders and tails...WHY DON'T YOU TELL US HOW TO DO IT? You will have served the industry well by doing that, and had you done it at the beginning, maybe the forum would not have run on so long.

Even after thirty years, I'm still willing to learn more, to help improve the show!

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-26-2000 11:44 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
An easy request. However, first I do not consider myself to be the world's greatest projectionist. I will however admit that I am extraordinarily picky and I can honestly say that prints leaving my theater do infact leave absolutely flawless without even so much as a single ID frame missing. Anyone who has ever been to see my presentation can easily back me up on that. Feel free to visit anytime for your own opinion.

Second, many other operators I know of can do the reading the optical track/edgemarking trick, so perhaps it is just your part of the country or local that the tricks never circulated around. That being the case, then your request is indeed a fantastic idea for the projectionist community!

Third I would be much more happy to demonstrate tricks online without the Kraus-like sarcasm in the future...but nonetheless I will work on getting some pictures together and try to figure out a way to explain online how this is done in the tips section. I do have many things going on at the present time, so please don't expect me to drop everything and get this done immediately. Please be patient, as there are several other site items already ahead of this one on the "to do" list and all take a good amount of time.

Richard C. Wolfe
Master Film Handler

Posts: 250
From: Northampton, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 05-27-2000 12:16 AM      Profile for Richard C. Wolfe   Author's Homepage   Email Richard C. Wolfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you.
I'll be watching for it.

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-27-2000 09:24 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John: You crazy guy!

In situations like this, I always yield to the guy with the kill switch.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-27-2000 09:29 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
RICHARD WOLFE: Welcome! Welcome! (You probably remember my wife, Lori, who often pays you a visit at the Roxy, on her trips back to PA. She was just there a couple months ago.)

------------------
Better Projection Pays!


Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-27-2000 10:59 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well I might now get censored
Steve I don't appreciate a spammed email fromyou to every user of this forum with your deleted post
get a god damned life
P.S. You also referred to Mr derick as a Box maker which is very rude and unproffesional to a sound engineer who happens to probably forgotten far more than you ever known. Also he is a recording engineer and as such I think probably has a bit more insit than a daily's projectionist

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-27-2000 12:41 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that the administrator should be able to censored here just like any where else. I however, in all fairness, don't think a person should be permanently banned from Film-Tech the first time around. I think everyone deserves a second chance. Perhaps a person that is censored should not be allowed to post for 30 days. After that 30 days they would be reinstated. In most cases a cooling off period for both sides will help allot. If they persist and are censored a second time then that person SHOULD be banned form this site. Then its obviously the persons nature and that will not go well on this site.
E-bay operates their site much this way and it works well for them. It would also work here.
As far as the Steve vs Brad issue I have not been privy to it all as it unfolded but I didn't take anything said about me seriously. I know and understand that others would be offended and if someone is offended then they shuld contact the site administrator to resolve it. All in all this would be the fair way to handle this sort of situation.
Mark

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-27-2000 12:58 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark...just what Steve vs Brad debate are you referring you @%#^&%$%^ ;-)

Actually, if someone feels offended by inferrence, contact that person via email for clarification. More often than not, offense was not the goal or intent.

I, for the life of me, can not understand how this has gotten blown out the way it has. I will say it has been unpleasent reading in some parts and informative in others, thank god.

If you all don't watch out, I'm gonna start a thread on "HPS-4000, better with or without an ID frame!"

Steve (the other one)

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-27-2000 01:50 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well, it appears that Mr. kraus has taken his rant with Film-tech to rec.arts.movies.tech on usenet...

-AS

Christopher K. Williams
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: Redmond, WA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 05-27-2000 02:16 PM      Profile for Christopher K. Williams   Email Christopher K. Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, everyone!
This is my first post on Film-Tech. I thought that this would be an appropriate time to put in “my two cents”. I have been “lurking” on this website for about 7 months now, and have been reading the now infamous “ID Frame” thread this past week. Much has been said already, so I’ll try to keep this short.
I very much enjoy reading the posts on this site; every person who posts here is dedicated to his or her job and providing the best presentation for their patrons. I appreciate Brad’s efforts in administering this site and I have found a wealth of good information here, which I try to put into practice. Overall, this site is an extremely positive experience from my point of view, and even when there is a hot debate, I learn something new. I won’t add fuel to the fire by stating my opinion on Brad’s closing the thread, or weather or not to leave on ID frames. But I would like to say thanks to all of you who post for the tips you provide, and we should all remember that even when there is an argument, all of our goals are still the same: Better film presentation.

I look forward to talking with all of you in future threads!

Chris Williams
Regal Bella Bottega 11 Cinemas
Redmond, WA

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-27-2000 02:43 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not you Steve G. I mean Steve K. I agree with you that they should contact each other and work it out. This is not the place for that. Personally, I kept out of it even though I was refered to on at least one Ocassion. I don't take some post like that personally, ever. No matter who it comes from.
Mark

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-27-2000 05:48 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Funny, I never said Mr. Kraus was banned permanently. I only pulled his posting priviledges to let a little time pass so everyone could cool off a bit, but he most certainly is banned NOW. (Mr. Kraus, you have already verified this because when you went to post, you received a message to this extent and not a "member not found/deleted" message. When I receive complaints from other forum members, I will take action. Mr. Kraus derived more than his fair share of offensive remarks and I mentioned this to him and humored him as well by even grabbing a few quick examples per his continuing request. Perhaps they were not the best examples I could have chosen, but I didn't feel like wasting much of my time on the issue and yet he shifted his full attention over against me for it.

Now Mr. Kraus has taken it upon himself to spam this site for email addresses and has sent out emails over it to many forum members in an attempt to turn everyone against me. Well, if anyone is offended at the way I handled the situation regardless of just how much of the info you have on the subject, you are free to leave. I took action because there were other forum members who contacted me, as well as myself, who were offended at Mr. Kraus' remarks and that is that. I do not force anyone to be here and work extremely hard and spend quite a lot of money keeping this site up and running. Sure I could easily go out and get banner ads and program in those annoying popups to make back that money through advertising, but I feel the service I am offering here is worth the cash out of my pocket every month.

I am not against Mr. Kraus having a differing opinion of my own. If that was the case, I would've banned Steve Guttag the first day...but Steve G. is in my opinion a benefit to all on this site with his expertise. (For those who do not follow all the threads, Steve G. and I like to "fight" the old platter vs. changeover thing virtually every few months. However, we make it clear by the use of expressions that we are only teasing. ) I have no doubt Mr. Kraus is also an excellent operator, but if I am going to have to deal with his rantings on a daily basis (yes, every single day since he signed up), then no one on this planet is worth that amount of effort to me.

Mr. Kraus has apparently decided that since someone has a differing opinion than his own (mine in particular) that he will stop at nothing until I admit I am wrong and beg for his forgiveness. At least that's the way I perceive it because he created this "censorship" thread after I closed the "ID frame" thread (which was turning into a rant and was going nowhere) in which he has simply moved the rantings from that thread onto this thread. Now Mr. Kraus has commenced email spamming above to an unknown amount of members here and finally, started this entire argument again over on a newsgroup! This is just completely taking it too far. Not once did he bother to send me an email during all of this, he just decided to "get even" like an immature child. The man has rubbed me the wrong way too much at this point and I will stand my ground.

Mr. Kraus, please grow up a bit and remember, it's just a web site. Your life is not over, and also remember that the newsgroup is "unmoderated" so you can rant over there until your heart is content.

I would hope we can all get back to productive discussions now. I am closing this thread in an attempt to put an end to this nonsense. If anyone has something else to say on this issue, please email me.




All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.