|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Joe's Reviews
|
|
|
Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 08-11-2000 02:35 AM
Ballantyne uses plastic (actually fiber) gears on the intermittents and shutter trains (Pat, correct me if I'm wrong) to protect the projector's metal vertical shaft. The shaft is "non-field replaceable", and in the event of a component failure, the fiber gears are designed to "break first".If the intermittent locks up it will stop the machine cold. The shutter (as a result of momentum) will still want to spin. The fiber gear will simply disintegrate (cheap and easy to fix) instead of taking a chunk out of the shaft (send it to the factory). Century has to be my all time favorite projector to place in the field. You can abuse them for years! While people make fun of Ballantyne oil leaks, I have never seen a Simplex that didn't have a bucket or paint roller tray under it to protect the floor! (LOL) Of the three, Ballantynes are the easiest to service. I am still trying to convince an "old codger" tech of ours to post here. I think he eventually will. His name is Mike McKee and when you see him you should ask him how he got the name "Cross-eyed Mike". He started out hating Ballantynes, but now he likes them. Russ
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 08-11-2000 11:43 AM
I sort of feel there's a quality vs. labor time thing with projectors. For example, a Century is fairly inexpensive; so are the parts. But it's also fairly easy to fix. Personally, I feel they are also high maintaince (no oil bath.) Their reliabilty is like a Volkswagon's.I think Simplexes are better, but they are more expensive to buy. Also, they are more involved to repair. Now, (going against the grain!) I've had very good luck with Cinemeccanicca (V8's and V9's.) They are more expensive and the parts are out-of-sight. Hardly ever had to fix any big problems. But, one time we had to change a shutter shaft on a V8, and holy smokes! What a major job- everything has to come apart. Took all day. So, what's better? A cheap projector that's easy to fix, or an expensive one that takes all day? On my previous ramblings: They will probably never get rid of Simplex or Century! At my past two (daytime) jobs, they made stuff in big quanities. So, reducing anything "redundent" was consitered good. And I must admit, I'm in that same mode. But, it is true that new tooling costs may be more than would be saved than if existing tooling were kept and used. At one place where I worked, I designed a 19" rack to hold some fiber-optic equipment. There was a question of how it should be grounded to meet the (then new) EEC rules (the equivalent of USA's FCC, UL, etc.) We wanted to meet those rules. It allows you to put the "CE" mark on your equipment, and without it, you can't sell a thing in Europe. All I wanted to do was punch a 0.125" hole in a panel, so field people could mount a grounding stud later (and not have to drill a hole.) At the design review, everyone was going; "Are you crazy?! That hole will add 15 cents to every panel!" We were going to make about 5000 panels. The accountants had everything figured out to the penny to make the bid and were reluctant to spend the extra money.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Kilderry
Master Film Handler

Posts: 355
From: Melbourne Australia
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 08-12-2000 03:52 AM
Getting back to the earlier part of this thread...........I too work for one of the worlds largest cinema chains as David Johnson does (I used to work with him but that's another story!). We use Christie, Kinoton and Cinemeccanica as our main brands but also have just about everything else made in the last 30 years. We have had a few disasterous Christie installations (5 Ultramittants in 12 months), but some very solid ones too. One Christie, located close to me, has never skipped a beat in 5 years and it is in a remote projection booth with little daily attention other than cleans and threads. As a large chain we continue to purchase from several manufacturers in projection and sound (Dolby mostly but also DTS and SDDS). The absolute keys to running ANY equipment is professional installation and most importantly experienced, dedicated projection staff. In most of our locations in this country we now have at least one projectionist with 20 years plus experience. I will always hire and train people who are interested and dedicated to the craft of cinema projection. Film has a lot of life in it yet. The biggest single thing that any cinema can do to improve their presentation is have a projectionist who knows how to clean (lenses, port glasses, mirrors, film path, platter rollers, payouts) thread-up consistantly, understand what screen presentation is and maintain the equipment(dolby tone once per fortnight, oil & belt changes general adjustments). And Oh, one very important thing, check the auditoriums once per shift for sound level, temperature and a patrons view of focus. David Kilderry
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|