|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Will green band-cutting be allowed to continue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-17-2003 06:33 PM
I think everyone here knows I am a huge fan of the green bands. When I go to a theater that shows them it gives me advance notice of whether the projectionists/managers are projection idiots or not, so I can prepare myself for the experience I am about to enjoy/hate.
Three things...
#1 Is it in frame? Green bands are a great way to help the less-than-adequate projectionist verify the framing is proper. While this isn't much of an issue with scope films, is there ANYONE out there anymore that can properly frame a flat film??? If the MPAA would send out green bands that were hard matted to 1.66 with CLEAR frame lines that had in small lettering "go complain to the manager as your projectionist is not doing his job properly", that would solve most of these framing issues.
#2 Is it clean? If I see dirt and scratches, at least a good 10 minutes before the movie starts I can prepare myself knowing that the theater I am at has sloppy film handlers. I can overlook dirt and marks to a certain point if I have the mindset for it. If the damage is too great, then I can leave before the movie even starts.
#3 Green bands help me feel like I am not watching tv. I really hate the panic speed pace of television commercials, and chopping off green bands brings that feeling to the big screen.
Now the problem is those green bands that look like crap. Universal used to be the worst offenders here on their scope bands where the right side and corners would be dark, giving the illusion the lamp source was not properly aligned. Occasionally I see slight misframing errors on the green bands too. The biggest thing I am learning to hate is these new green bands that tell you why a movie is rated for what it was. I could really do without the green bands tagged like this:
THE FOLLOWING PREVIEW HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR ALL AUDIENCES BY THE MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA"
...followed by...
"This movie has been rated PG for sexuality, bad language, violence, cow tipping, homosexual rape, tea bagging, beastiality, depicted animal cruelty, child pornography and Lance Bass."
(Seriously, I do wish the MPAA would make one master clean band and give them to the studios free of charge. But PLEASE leave out the descriptive crap at the bottom!)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|