|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What is Film-Guard?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-15-2001 04:29 PM
Antonio,Ignore anyone who speaks to you about how great FILM GUARD is, and that you should be using it. If it is as good as they say, they should be sending you sample bottle, after and after. I work for a very big company in Australia, we have heard of Film Guard, but they are doing us no favours in trying to promote it. (We are yet to find a way to get a sample) Perhaps the US market it all they require?? The normal course of running your projection room no problems should accure: -Brain wrap arounds caused by static (just raise humitity -Open the bio door for 5 mins) -Prints that look they have been dragged across the floor (simply, vacuum or mop the floor EVERY night - this IS important) -PTR Rinse in detergent as much as possible run, by-pass if not dry in time. (If you don't have a by-pass roller 0 make one) - THINK where and how our prints getting all this crap on them, when they looked rather good at first run. ANSWER - AIR-CON filters to bio are always full of junk - clean them or any air source to bio MOP/VACUUM floor every night It would be nice to cover the prints/plate, and get the cleaner to vacuum/Mop the projection room but as far as I know, it is illegeal to allow cleaners into the projection room. Bill.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 05-16-2001 04:47 AM
Bill, come on out to the Ritz and take a look for yourself. It'd be good to see you again after all this time.You think your prints look good now? So did I. Throw out the PTR's. The prints will be cleaner without them. ------------------ Children really brighten up your life...they never turn off lights.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 05-16-2001 02:29 PM
John Wilson said: "Throw out the PTR's. The prints will be cleaner without them."Mark said: "PTR rollers are a joke for theatres. They were designed mainly to keep negative clean on printers in labs." As one who helped develop PTR (Particle Transfer Roller) film cleaning technology, I take exception to those statements! PTRs are a very efficient, cost-effective, and low risk film cleaning technology. Unlike other cleaning methods, PTRs do not use solvents or risk "rubbing" contact with the film. They are widely used by labs and film-to-video transfer facilities to clean irreplacable negatives. PTRs are the preferred way of cleaning prints on almost all IMAX projectors. Yes, with a particularly dirty print, the PTRs can become overloaded with dirt particles, and "transfer" them back to the film (after several cleanings, the dirt level decreases dramatically). No, PTRs cannot clean oily deposits or fingerprints off the film. Yes, you do usually need to wash and dry them before using them for another show (but one set of rollers can clean at least a thousand showings). PTR film cleaning technology is useful for any film where the application of foreign materials on the film could be detrimental to the use or long-term stability (e.g., negatives, IMAX prints). For general release prints, it is certainly ONE of the good options available. http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/ptr_main.html http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/ptr_prod.html http://www.sanlabsystems.com/ptrclean.html http://www.ebu.ch/tech_t3289.pdf ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-16-2001 02:47 PM
Labs, yes PTRs would be preferred.IMAX, well the field flattener design prohibits any kind of solvent from being used and I don't know where exactly a dry media cleaner would be mounted, so I wouldn't use the word "preferred". Regular theaters dealing with non-clean room environments, PTRs don't do that good of a job. Even brand new prints coming in from the depots are generally quite dirty from the old shipping cans and the dusty clip-together reels. PTRs only seem to be effective in controlled film handling rooms, of which I have never seen a suitabe projection booth meet. Anyone who has had a chance to perform one of the following tests, feel free to list it below: Test #1 PTR cleaning vs. dry media cleaner Test #2 PTR cleaning vs. media cleaner with FilmGuard I have performed both and the first test clearly beat out a set of brand new PTRs over a one week period. The second test is hands down over PTRs. There really is no risk of abrasion from the rubbing action on a media cleaner when used "wet". Only running the media pads "dry" can cause scratching.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|