Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What is Film-Guard? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: What is Film-Guard?
Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-14-2001 03:38 PM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark,

It wasn't what I meant!

My theater will never buy a film cleaner because have already an "human cleaner".
I *personally* bought film-guard because I was very curious to see how does it works.
I will not buy also a cleaner!

Bye
Antonio

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 05-15-2001 12:20 AM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby:

I get high on fumes. Dont even have to take the top off the bottle.

You can find BABY QUIET on the shelf next to KITTY QUIET at any good hardware store. One squirt and my cats just get happy and go away.

I'd guess that a Film-Guard hangover would be one of the worst experiences of my life. All that lubrication. Yecch!

Just imagine, waking in the morning after a hard night of guzzlin'. You'll be looking into the lens while a Tech feature is running and asking everyone in the theater where the color went?

Or, you could just become obnoxious and throw FG bombs on the patrons.

No, that wouldn't work. You drank it all.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-15-2001 10:20 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Antonio,
Thats too bad as you are missing out on the best aspect of using Filmguard. The human factor has nothing to do with using Filmguard in the best possible way, it simply works best if done with the Kelmar cleaner. Perhaps you are not really too concerned about giving your patrons the best show possible that can be done??
Mark @ GTS


 |  IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-15-2001 11:48 AM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark,

I think that you are missing what I mean.

I paid the filmguard's bottle with my money. I'm just the projectionist of my theater, not a manager.
My management will never buy a film cleaner for my theater for many reasons.

I was just curious to see how filmguard works and I bought a bottle. I pay a lot of money because there were a lot of shipping costs.
Now, I'm trying FG on few Dolby trailers, to see how does it works.
I really don't know if I'll try it on an entire film, to have the bottle empty in few time.
I care the composition but I cannot pay for it!!

Bye
Antonio

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-15-2001 03:43 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Antonio, I know what you are saying. There are many foolish management people here in the States too that will not buy it. I have many projectionists come in just to buy a bottle for themselves and take care of static with it. Just try to use as small a quantity as you can when you clean film. Too much Filmguard is as bad as having a really dirty print!
Mark @ GTS


 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-15-2001 04:29 PM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Antonio,

Ignore anyone who speaks to you about how great FILM GUARD is, and that you should be using it.

If it is as good as they say, they should be sending you sample bottle, after and after.

I work for a very big company in Australia, we have heard of Film Guard, but they are doing us no favours in trying to promote it.
(We are yet to find a way to get a sample)

Perhaps the US market it all they require??

The normal course of running your projection room no problems should accure:

-Brain wrap arounds caused by static (just raise humitity -Open the bio door for 5 mins)

-Prints that look they have been dragged across the floor (simply, vacuum or mop the floor EVERY night - this IS important)

-PTR Rinse in detergent as much as possible run, by-pass if not dry in time.
(If you don't have a by-pass roller 0 make one)

- THINK where and how our prints getting all this crap on them, when they looked rather good at first run.

ANSWER -
AIR-CON filters to bio are always full
of junk - clean them or any air source to bio

MOP/VACUUM floor every night
It would be nice to cover the prints/plate, and get the cleaner to vacuum/Mop the projection room
but as far as I know, it is illegeal to allow cleaners into the projection room.

Bill.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-15-2001 04:31 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, I worked for a year at a place where management was too cheap to buy splicing tape! I was buying the really good stuff that Christy's sells for $5 a roll (out of my own pocket) until I realized that Neumade tape was just as good and much cheaper. Surely the occasonal bottle of FG won't break the bank... In any case, a bottle of FG lasts a pretty long time. I haven't had the chance to use it in a theatre yet, so I can't give exact numbers, but I've cleaned dozens of really bad prints at home with it and still haven't used a third of a bottle (most of these were admittedly 16mm prints, but many required multiple cleanings).

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-15-2001 04:46 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

Before bashing any product or your efforts to get a sample, how about contacting the manufacturer directly? Guess that never crossed your mind???

Mopping the floor and raising humidity and the like is all well and good, but prints will still get dirty over time regardless. Maybe they won't get dirty enough to fall below your specific requirements, but that doesn't mean that they are not getting below my spec or someone else's spec. FilmGuard is not designed to be a replacement for good booth practices. It is something to make good booth practices and the presentation that much better. Nowhere has it ever been advertised as a replacement for a good operator and good procedures.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-15-2001 05:03 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Ignore anyone who speaks to you about how great FILM GUARD is, and that you should be using it. If it is as good as they say, they should be sending you sample bottle, after and after."

Huh?
I use it religiously. The methods you speak of are nice but they don't clean the film or lubricate the gate. If you've never tried this stuff how can you pass judgement like you have?


------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut
http://www.muellersatomics.com/

 |  IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-15-2001 05:13 PM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark,

Yes, I've noted that too much filmguard is not good. However, since I never saw a well filmguarded print, I cannot understand how much filmguatd should stay on the print!!
I will do my best.

Bill,
Your "recommendations" are good. However I really don't think that keep clean the booth is enought. Not all projectors are perfectly aligned, not all prints are perfect-printed.
I agree with you: clean floor and AC filters is important but I really don't think that is enough.
About a sample of Film-Guard... I think that a bottle is cheap enough to doesn't require samples.

Bye
Antonio

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-16-2001 04:47 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill, come on out to the Ritz and take a look for yourself. It'd be good to see you again after all this time.

You think your prints look good now? So did I.

Throw out the PTR's. The prints will be cleaner without them.

------------------
Children really brighten up your life...they never turn off lights.

 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Carter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 248
From: Gloucester, Massachusetts, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-16-2001 01:29 PM      Profile for Rachel Carter   Email Rachel Carter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

What if you don't work in a first run theater and the film is a mess when you get it? Will cleaning the floors help then?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-16-2001 01:49 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill, Indeed you are dead wrong. Film-Guard makes such a dramatic difference in on screen look that to not use it is a disservice to your patrons. I ship Film-Guard to John Wilson and if you want a free trial I'd be glad to ship you a quart bottle and a box of media, but you must pay for shipping and you must also have a Kelmar Cleaner. That is all I ask.

A Quart bottle of film-guard retails for 35.00 here in the states! That bottle will last at least 6 months in a 6 screen theater when used properly.

PTR rollers are a joke for theatres. They were designed mainly to keep negative clean on printers in labs. I refuse to sell them anymore to my customners.
Mark @ GTS

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-16-2001 02:29 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John Wilson said: "Throw out the PTR's. The prints will be cleaner without them."

Mark said: "PTR rollers are a joke for theatres. They were designed mainly to keep negative clean on printers in labs."

As one who helped develop PTR (Particle Transfer Roller) film cleaning technology, I take exception to those statements!

PTRs are a very efficient, cost-effective, and low risk film cleaning technology. Unlike other cleaning methods, PTRs do not use solvents or risk "rubbing" contact with the film. They are widely used by labs and film-to-video transfer facilities to clean irreplacable negatives. PTRs are the preferred way of cleaning prints on almost all IMAX projectors.

Yes, with a particularly dirty print, the PTRs can become overloaded with dirt particles, and "transfer" them back to the film (after several cleanings, the dirt level decreases dramatically). No, PTRs cannot clean oily deposits or fingerprints off the film. Yes, you do usually need to wash and dry them before using them for another show (but one set of rollers can clean at least a thousand showings).

PTR film cleaning technology is useful for any film where the application of foreign materials on the film could be detrimental to the use or long-term stability (e.g., negatives, IMAX prints). For general release prints, it is certainly ONE of the good options available.
http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/ptr_main.html
http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/ptr_prod.html
http://www.sanlabsystems.com/ptrclean.html
http://www.ebu.ch/tech_t3289.pdf


------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-16-2001 02:47 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Labs, yes PTRs would be preferred.

IMAX, well the field flattener design prohibits any kind of solvent from being used and I don't know where exactly a dry media cleaner would be mounted, so I wouldn't use the word "preferred".

Regular theaters dealing with non-clean room environments, PTRs don't do that good of a job. Even brand new prints coming in from the depots are generally quite dirty from the old shipping cans and the dusty clip-together reels. PTRs only seem to be effective in controlled film handling rooms, of which I have never seen a suitabe projection booth meet.

Anyone who has had a chance to perform one of the following tests, feel free to list it below:

Test #1 PTR cleaning vs. dry media cleaner

Test #2 PTR cleaning vs. media cleaner with FilmGuard

I have performed both and the first test clearly beat out a set of brand new PTRs over a one week period. The second test is hands down over PTRs. There really is no risk of abrasion from the rubbing action on a media cleaner when used "wet". Only running the media pads "dry" can cause scratching.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.