Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » MTS Folding????? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: MTS Folding?????
Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 06-26-2002 04:37 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is very true since it is rumoured that they filed Chapter 7 last week. In our sales we had bumped into them in a competitive sense several times. It may help or hinder......suppliers are more spooked, and planning projects lately have used more effort to package products for the customers who are able to pay.....so we are back to the business of the early 1990's before Jurassic Park and the Regal boom.
The parent of MTS - Soundelux is still rolling along with multiple other corporations in the production field, so some people may have been absorbed. Soundelux had control of MTS for only a few years...and I remember selling DTS players prior to their purchase of MTS and the conversations with them about the business.
You have to love this business since there are five basic rules of successful business; at least 3 or 4 are violated to get some of these deals done.
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-26-2002 07:13 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave Lund said: "MTS is NOT going out of business, it is NOT leaving the film business or reducing its prominence there, it IS continuing to support D-Cinema technology and the SMPTE DC-28 standards effort."

If the current rumor is true that they did indeed close the doors under Chapter 7, then MTS committed another serious error. The big lie. They new about it, and they knew they lied.

Here is an excerpt from bankruptcy laws:

A straightforward bankruptcy proceeding generally takes 4-6 months. In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, nonexempt assets are sold to pay creditors while most debts are discharged.

Personally, I have more respect for a company that will level with us and tell us the truth up front than to try and cover it up with a big lie. Shame on them.....

If MTS has closed just temporary, then I will apologize. If it is a permanent closure, then they got what they deserved. If it is a chapter 7, I don't think they will ever re-open. There won't be anything left to trade for a hamburger.

And now the vendors got the shaft! Totally unfair to the vendors who trusted them.

With the latest information I received, there will be no apologies from me to them.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-26-2002 09:59 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What was said may have been the true intention at the time. It's been well over a month. Further, the poster may not have been privy to all the information or to decisions being made at the parent company level. I'll take it for granted that no one is going to deliberately go out of their way to say something that is going to make them look stupid or a liar a month later. We're not stock analysts or anyone someone needs to impress where there might be some benefit to telling the "big lie." They could have easily just said nothing at all.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 12:02 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, Steve. I wanted to believe as you did. But after what came down today that I have not or will not post, I simply cannot believe they didn't know.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 10:04 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK...let's follow your scenario. What does he gain by posting?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 11:58 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, the answer I believe is Time.

After reading the Chapter 7 laws, it looks like a very complicated and time consuming procedure. I don't think this all could be done in 46 days before the order is granted.
.....................................................................
Introduction:

The following is an outline of select areas of bankruptcy law which are significant as you contemplate a filing under Chapter 7. Often, someone who considers bankruptcy is unaware of the nuances of bankruptcy or certain creditors' rights in bankruptcy. You should be familiar with some of the applicable provisions as you prepare for filing. What follows is not, by any means, an exhaustive review of bankruptcy law; nor does it fully explain each provision of the bankruptcy code or rules which might apply because each individual's situation is unique and sometimes unanticipated events occur; however, this overview will provide you with broad guidelines so that you may be comfortable with your decision. I will begin with an outline of basic procedures in Chapter 7 case and conclude with a discussion of various Chapter 7 pitfalls.

Basic Procedure

1. Upon filing, you will be required to file a sworn list of creditors, a schedule of assets and liabilities, a list of exempt property, a schedule of current income and expenditures, a statement of your financial affairs and a statement of intent regarding consumer debts secured by property of the estate. You will also be required to surrender to the trustee all property of the estate. 11 U.S.C. 521. The order of relief is granted when you file. What this means, among other things, is that an automatic stay is triggered, prohibiting creditors from pursuing you or your property outside of the bankruptcy proceeding.
B. The clerk of court will give notice of the bankruptcy to your creditors. 11 U.S.C. 342.

C. There will be a meeting of creditors called to question you about your debts and ability to pay. The U.S. Trustee calls this meeting and you are required to attend. The judge may not question you at this time. Other creditors and the trustee may question you. Unlike a trial, your attorney may not "object" to questions in a formal sense. It is an open opportunity for creditors to question you and you are required to respond in good faith. 11 U.S.C. 341.

D. A creditor of the trustee assigned to your case may object to your listed exemptions within 30 days after the meeting of creditors.

E. A creditor must file a proof of claim within 90 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors. At the end of the case, if a surplus remains after all of the claims are paid in full, the court may grant an extension of time for filing of claims not filed during the initial 90 day period.

The trustee may object to any claim.

F. An objection to your receiving a general discharge of all of your debts must be filed by the trustee or a creditor within 60 days following the first date set for the creditors meeting If no objections are filed, and if no motion to dismiss is pending, the court will ordinarily grant a discharge upon expiration of the 60 day period. Bankruptcy Rules 4004 and 1017; 11 U.S.C. 727.

G. A creditor may object to the dischargeability of a particular debt at any time if the debt: (1) is for a tax or customs duty; (2) is not listed in the schedules so that a creditor could file a proof of claim; (3) is related to alimony or child support; (4) is a government fine or penalty; or (4) is a government insured student loan. Any student loans guaranteed or insured by the government will not be dischargeable. This means that you will continue to be liable for the payment even if you file bankruptcy.

A creditor may object to the dischargeability of a particular debt only within 60 days of the first date set for the meeting of creditors, if the debt: (1) is a consumer debt created close to filing; (2) is a result of fraud; (3) is a result of a wilful and malicious injury to a person or property of another. Bankruptcy Rule 4007; 11 U.S.C. 523.

Debtor Pitfalls

The debtor's goal in any Chapter 7 is to have as many debts discharged as possible. The general rule is that all debts created before the bankruptcy filing are discharged. Discharge destroys any person liability you may have on a claim or debt. (Discharge will not destroy liens; liens survive the bankruptcy.)
There are some very significant exceptions to the general rule that all debts will be discharged. As stated above, a creditor can try to have his claim excepted from discharge pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. 523. If the claim is not discharged, the debtor continues to be responsible for its payment; obviously, this could have severe consequences to the debtor seeking a "fresh start" which is the very purpose of the Chapter 7 filing.

There are ten categories of debt excluded from discharge under 523. These fall into two areas: debts that are not dischargeable due to the wrongful conduct of the debtor and debts that are not dischargeable due to public policy.

The debts not dischargeable due to the debtor's misconduct include those created by intentional torts, fraud, larceny, embezzlement, fiduciary violations, and drunken driving. The debts not dischargeable due to public policy include alimony and child support, taxes and customs duties, governmental fines, penalties and forfeitures, educational loans, unscheduled debts and certain debts surviving a prior bankruptcy case. A claim must fall within one of these exceptions to be found non-dischargeable.

To prevail on a fraud exception, the creditor would need to show that there was a false, material representation of fact made by the debtor that the debtor knew was false at the time he made it, made with the intention of deceiving the creditor. Some courts have held that when a credit card is used, the debtor impliedly represents that the debtor has the ability and intention to pay for the goods and services charged. Those courts have therefore found that some credit card debt is non-dischargeable under the fraud exception.

This is not the only potential problem that can arise with credit card or similar debt. 523 also provides that there is a presumption that certain consumer debt created right before filing a Chapter 7 is non-dischargeable. The presumption of non-dischargeability will apply if the debt is a consumer debt for so-called "luxury goods or services" incurred or within 40 days before the filing, owing to a single creditor aggregating more than $500. Further, the presumption of non-dischargeability will apply if there are cash advances made by a creditor for more than $1000 that are extensions of consumer credit under an open end credit plan within 20 days of filing bankruptcy.

Luxury goods and services are not defined by the Bankruptcy Code and the determination of same will be contingent upon the facts and circumstances of each case. I can tell you that courts have characterized such items as a person computer, coffee maker, floral arrangements and three-wheel recreational vehicle as "luxury" items.

Any credit extended based on false financial statements is subject to exception from discharge. Statements made in the financial statements have to be materially false with the intent to deceive the creditor to fall within this exception. Note that a credit application should not qualify as a "financial statement" if it does not require a disclosure of debts.

It is crucial for the debtor to include all creditors in his schedules filed with the court. If a debtor knows of the creditor and does not schedule him, the creditor is denied participation in any distribution; to protect the creditor from this type of problem, the code provides that unscheduled claims may be non-dischargeable.

Debts created by willful and malicious injury will also be excepted from discharge. These types of claims arise from intentional actions by the debtor, done with malice which causes damage. It is important to note that ordinary negligence claims are dischargeable. A plaintiff with a personal injury claim would need to allege significantly more than simple negligence to have his or her claim deemed non-dischargeable in the bankruptcy court.

Not only may a single creditor attempt to have a particular debt found non-dischargeable pursuant to 523. Chapter 7 debtors also need to be aware that, pursuant to U.S.C. 727, upon motion by the trustee or a creditor, the court may disallow a final discharge of all debts, of whatever nature, if the debtor, among other things:

(1) destroys or conceals his property within one year before filing or after the date of filing, with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud a creditor;

(2) conceals, destroys, falsifies or fails to preserve records of his financial condition;

(3) knowingly in a bankruptcy case makes a false account, oath or claim;

(4) gives, offers, receives, or attempts to obtain money, property or an advantage for acting or forbearing to act;

(5) withholds from an officer of the estate records related to his property or financial affairs;

(6) fails to satisfactorily explain any loss of assets; or

(7) refuses to obey court orders or refuses to respond to questions posed by the court.

Finally, the court may dismiss a Chapter 7 case if the debtor:

(1) unreasonably delays the proceedings to the creditors' prejudice;

(2) fails to pay necessary fees or payments; or

(3) fails to file his schedules.

Dismissal may also be justified if the debtor is an individual who has primarily consumer debt and the court finds that the granting of relief would be a substantial abuse of the bankruptcy process. Substantial abuse has been found by courts if the debtor is actually able to pay his debts when due.
.....................................................................

Steve, I guess we will both have to see what happens in a Court of Law, and how bad the vendors get the shaft. Pennies on a buck is quite a jolt for the vendors, if they receive anything at all.

We may never learn the full story about this one.

This is as far as I am going to address the issue. It gets too complicated beyond this point.


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-27-2002 12:38 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also believe it was a "confidence booster" for any of the lower employees. They knew he posted on Film-Tech, because a tech from MTS told me about it. With a post like that the techs and other workers wouldn't rush out right away to find other jobs.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 02:19 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, it could have been, as well as a false "confidence booster" or a false sense of security for the vendors.


 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 02:59 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The web site worked yesterday but not today.

Email to them bounces from postmaster@showorkseg.com.

The recipient name is not recognized
MSEXCH:IMS:Soundelux:USA:MTSMINN 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient

MTS has a Teccon 70mm mag head that belongs to the Madstone Centrum in Cleveland Heights, Ohio. I want it back.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 03:04 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Or, they could have filed for a Chapter 11 reorganization. At the last minute one or more creditors unexpectedly refused to accept the terms of the reorg and forced them into Chapter 7.

I've seen this happen, where the sheriff walks into the business, serves you and tells you to leave the premises.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-27-2002 03:29 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeffry, you work for Madstoned? You will NEVER get a 70mm print, but I can understand you wanting what was left behind in your theater before Madstone purchased it back!


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 03:43 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The MTS websites revert to the ISP, Net Specialists:
http://www.mediatechnologysource.com/
http://www.mediatechsrc.com

The Soundelux site is still alive:
http://www.soundelux.com/

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-27-2002 07:20 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Adam, I can see where the sheriff would come into a place and oust everyone to keep the assets from waltzing through the door.

When Plitt went bankrupt up here, reports came to me that the employees walked out of the theatres with boxes and boxes of concession merchandise. There was nobody to stop them.


 |  IP: Logged

Timothy Eiler
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 126
From: Litchfield , Minnesota, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 12:17 PM      Profile for Timothy Eiler   Author's Homepage   Email Timothy Eiler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I sit here looking at a 63,000.00 hospital bill for my Physically and mentally handicapped son. I am told that even though they took money out of my last check to pay for insurance when I was layed off two weeks ago. There will not pay any claims ( which were when i was employed) and there is no cobra. Apparently when you are self funded and declare Chapther 7 it it tough s**t when they dont put money in the account.

I am Glad That Soundelux Bought MTS Several years ago. The First thing they did was to drop profit sharing and give us stock options.
then the 401k match went away. they sold off several divisions and declared a huge stock dividend. And left Mts & Caddy to support the theme park entertainment division, Which was lossing money faster than Greenspan could print it. they then bought Impulse Group another profitable sound contractiong compant(I hope the owners took cash and not stock)But alas the theme division was losing money so fast and no one did a dam thing to stop that it was finaly to late. Thank you Lon Bender, Willie Statesman and Jeff Edell. As majority stock holders and ex-CEO i would not know what Share holder value means.

If my son does develop to a stage where he can walk,talk and have some understanding of the world around him ( the doctors think he will be a 12 year old). I will tell him all about what you guys did for the Business community and not about your Oscars.

When you guys go to your Business school reunion you can all have a big laugh about all the good people you screwed and then brag about how much money you cleaned out of the business.

Please send me the stock options as I am out of toilet paper and I would like to get some value From them.

Tim Eiler

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 01:13 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Timothy, I am very sorry. I wish you and your family well.

Paul


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.