|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: THX Sold
|
Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 06-06-2002 05:01 PM
Greg said: "There are theatres here which used to be THX certified and as soon as the owners dropped out of the THX program the quality of the presentation dropped off"Simply being THX certified doesn't ensure a great performance any more than not being THX certifies ensures a poor performance. If you've got a built-to-spec auditorium, not being THX certified won't change that. It seems to me that dropping certification, in your example, is reflective in an overall drop in attention to quality, attention to detail, etc. on behalf of the management. Joe: i would agree that most exhibitors seem to get off on cutting corners. From what I've heard, THX certification costs upwards of $1000 per screen per year. That could be better spent on added absorption panels, solid-core sound proof doors, and HVAC dampers etc. Doesn't Kodak have a TAP certification? perhaps its time to better exploit and market it as the THX replacement.(if it does, i'm not sure)... All we would need is a cool trailer and the public would DEMAND digital sound in a TAP certified auditorium!  (edit) in the other THX thread in yak somoeone mentioned a $10,000 price per screen per year for THX cert. YIKES! (edit)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-07-2002 02:56 AM
If this rumor is true, then THX has lost whatever credibility it still had with the exhibition industry, which is very sad.THX was just about the only organization which, at one point, was able to help improve exhibition (sound) quality through standardization and certification and was able to sell the general public on the idea that not all theatres sound alike and that audiences are better served by choosing a THX-certified house over a non-THX house (not always true in practice, of course, but there are very few THX houses which sound genuinely bad). I'm a beliver in the concepts behind THX certification, if not the current implementation, but the THX brand has been over-used lately (THX-approved VHS tapes and computer speakers!?!?) and emphasis seems to have drifted away from the theatrical end of things. What is really unfortunate is that no one seems to be prepared to replace THX in this capacity. Kodak tried to do something similar with Screencheck (a good idea which didn't catch on), but that didn't really address all of the acoustical issues that THX does...it was more of a complement to THX rather than a replacement for it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 06-07-2002 05:53 AM
Here's a link to the Kodak ScreenCheck program: http://www.kodak.com/go/screencheck The Kodak ScreenCheck Evaluation checks for obvious problems in sound, but does not do a full alignment. But it is more comprehensive than THX in looking at operational aspects of presentation, such as booth cleanliness and film handling procedures, and evidence of a good training and maintenance program. A full "report card" is shared with the theatre after each inspection, which is done every few months for theatres contracting for the service. I helped develop the ScreenCheck specifications, which are based on SMPTE standards and recommended practices. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243 e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 06-07-2002 05:59 PM
quote: Unfortunately, theatres find it hard to pay someone to tell them what is wrong with their operation.
I am not surprised at all. It is really sad. It's not like Kodak is just going in and saying "You suck! Fail!" and then running away with gobs of cash. They want to help improve what is wrong. But unfortunately most theaters think they are doing nothing wrong, and resent any suggestions on how anything could be improved. Why is that? Where do attitudes like that come from? Are the basic standards of the average human being too low? I hope I don't sound elitist but I am genuinely curious how mediocrity is allowed to shine. PS - This is getting off topic, I am going to start a new thread about this. Please don't reply about my comments above in this thread. Instead reply in the thread titled "Mediocrity is King".
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|