Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE
Topic Closed  Topic Closed


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Diagonal Scratches (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Diagonal Scratches
David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-14-2002 02:15 AM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And, wait until your private parts get snagged by the spindle of a side-saddle table. That will change your tune.....by about two octaves or so...

I don't know about that but it really hurts when I step on them.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-14-2002 10:42 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad said, "POOP on any kind of rewinding system that has the reels turned horizontally! Oh how I HATE horizontal rewind."

That's right. Down with platters!!!!

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-14-2002 12:47 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Cute attempt there John, but platters don't rewind. I guess you've never heard of them being called a "non-rewind film transport system". You REALLY need to work a platter booth for at least 6 months before you continue to make anti-platter slams. Reels are not always better by default. I've ran both and feel I can honestly state that. You have not and as such have no business making ignorant comments about them.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-14-2002 12:51 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you deconstruct a joke, it's not funny.
Yes, I'm well-aware that platters are non-rewind[ing] transport systems.

I don't personally feel that platters are better or worse, but I do think there is humor to be had; sorry you didn't appreciate it.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-14-2002 01:02 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thats what smileys are for.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-14-2002 01:36 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
There is a big difference.


"That's right. Down with platters!!!!"

...is not funny at all and is ignorance working overtime because there are people who actually believe running a film on a platter will ruin it and then praise changeover when the only real difference is that changeovers are not ran by inexperienced popcorn jockeys as platters commonly are. Such is a bullshit comparison and it always will be and that is why it is not funny.


"That's right. Down with platters!!!! "

...although not terribly humorous does have humor value to it with the smiley wink stating you are making a joke.


"Film just gets that way." (referring to film scratches)

Surely you don't agree with that statement, right??? This is no better or worse than your platter crack because there is no emoticon and spreads incorrect information.


"Film just gets that way."

Even if John Pytlak said this himself there would be some humor value to it, as he would at that point obviously be making fun of the large number of people who actually believe that film simply MUST degrade with each run.


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-14-2002 02:07 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regardless of the lack of smileys, I knew John was joking, and I laughed when I read his post. The humorous discussion of poop on the previous page was a clue that this also was a joke. So poop on this! But please don't poop on my xenon bulb.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-14-2002 03:31 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Doesn't matter Ken.

Thread closed

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.