|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Optical track matrixing.
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 10-19-2002 06:50 PM
Scott's right. A print master is the 2:4 matrixed mix, on 35mm magnetic film (but usually DAT these days). It's the audio that is used to feed the sound camera. quote: How did that happen?
That's a good question.  quote: By the way, there is Dolby Surround Mixing Manual available from Dolby as pdf.
Thank you, Michael. I believe that's for DVD and consumer products, but I'll pass this info along.------------------ Better Projection Pays!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-20-2002 05:34 AM
Just a small point that needs correction here. Gordy said: "..if there was a phase error in encoding or in the camera, it could decorrelate the signals enough to keep it as hard left and right, say equal level but a 90 degree shift".Gordy, if the signal is encoded at equal level but with a 90 degree phase difference, the sound will appear in ALL channels at equal level. The matrix regards such a signal as "mid-field" so the steering is turned off. Addition (or subtraction) of 90 degree phase shifted coherent signals results in a 3dB loss, so all four channels will have identical output levels. Small point I know but remember, accuracy!  In fact there is no way to get simultaneous left only and right only signals from the matrix (anybody's). Only one channel can be predominant at any one time. So Tim's original post intrigued me because it would be impossible to achieve, even with some kind of error. But he has since admitted there WAS centre, it just wasn't HARD centre. Remember the word, Tim - accuracy!  ------------------ Ray Derrick President/Chief Engineer Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-20-2002 06:46 AM
I just received an e-mail from someone requesting that I not to be so critical of Gordy by telling him to be "accurate". I guess if one person took it this way there will be others, so here goes -I have met Gordy, in fact had lunch with him and I must say I have very high regard for the man. In my opinion he is a skilled, very knowledgable and competent cinema engineer. He is also one hell of a nice guy into the bargain. My comments are intended as lighthearted and friendly and I am sure Gordy takes them that way. If I say something that is not quite correct I would expect Gordy or anyone else to correct me, hopefully also in a lighthearted way. I guess my references to accuracy are really aimed (subliminaly) at people who experience problems with equipment. Taking just a little time to accurately diagnose (and report) a problem makes finding a solution that much faster and easier. I often read Brad saying something like "please give us more information so we can help you". I should also mention that Australians (particularly me) tend to have slightly different (possibly even bizarre) sense of humour, compared with those residing on other parts of the planet. It comes from living on the underside of the globe where the earth is above your feet and the sky is below your head. Think about it. Ray
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 10-20-2002 03:11 PM
quote: But he has since admitted there WAS centre, it just wasn't HARD centre. Remember the word, Tim - accuracy!
Hi Ray, I thought I did describe it accurately. I've said all along that it sounded like it was coming from L and R, which it did. I didn't say it was coming from L and R.  quote: In fact there is no way to get simultaneous left only and right only signals from the matrix (anybody's). Only one channel can be predominant at any one time.
I appreciate everyone's input and expertise on this, really. I think the 70% value Gordon cited for the C and S channels was the key. The mix was out of proportion. Thanks again!  ------------------ Better Projection Pays!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-20-2002 06:15 PM
Don't mind the rest of us dragging this out Tim. We just like to chat.Gordy I assume you are talking about the Cat110 Mono/Stereo optical card. Now that was very early in the piece and not a "real" matrix, more of an interim step, and a poor one at that. It used gain riding rather than addition/subtraction. BTW the person that e-mailed me about Gordy has e-mailed again to say they were only joking. Sigh. See what I mean about differing senses of humour? Ray
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-20-2002 07:41 PM
Ok...back from vacation.I know I saw nothing on Ray's comments to take offense at...particularly since they were not aimed at me!  The backward compatibility thing only goes but so far...the 110/116 days and those tracks if played back on modern decoders will not sound the same as if played back on original equipment. The L and R vs C only ducted a small amount to each other to keep a hard center dialogue. Now if you mean backward compatibility in the sense that a modern film will "play" on old equipment, then yes it will play but will sound nothing like what they heard in the studio. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-21-2002 01:57 PM
Scott said: "Frank: do you _enjoy_ hearing 12KHz switching tones whenever anything plays in the surround channel?"When you get to be the age of Frank or myself, you don't even hear out to 12 KHz.  (Gone are the days when I heard the ultrasonic detectors used for traffic lights, harmonics from an ultrasonic film cleaner, or the high pitched whine of flyback transformers).  Flying small airplanes, high fader settings, and using a two-cycle rototiller in my garden without ear protection have evidently taken their toll. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243 e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-21-2002 06:01 PM
I know what you are saying Frank. But despite it's limitations, the matrix was a very elegant solution to the problem of creating a multi-track format for optical soundtracks. All credit goes to Dolby for this idea.Besides, a properly designed matrix in a correctly aligned system can fool probably 95% of a cinema audience into thinking they are listening to a discrete playback. It is only when the system malfunctions or there is an alignment problem that the conjuring trick is revealed. ------------------ Ray Derrick President/Chief Engineer Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|