|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Optical track matrixing.
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-24-2002 08:09 AM
Ray,I don't recall if the Sansui chip was used or not. EPRAD did use a Sansui chip on their STARSCOPE unit. I look into the Cat. 116 and get back to you. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-27-2002 12:09 AM
Well well well, you learn something every day. Thanks for the info Steve and Gordy. Presumably the left back and right back outputs from these chips were summed together to generate the single surround channel needed for the cinema matrix. Also I would surmise that the left front and right front outputs were not used, as the crosstalk is quite high in the QS (and SQ) systems. Obviously this was very early in the piece before Dolby realised there were much better (and much simpler) ways to do it. Are there many of the Cat116 cards still in service? Of course this doesn't change the fact that matrixing was indeed invented by Scheiber, if fact those patents of Sansui's that were filed in the USA (most were only filed in Japan) reference Schneider's original patent. Sansui simply added the phase shift as a different means of providing two rear channels. If you go back before Scheiber there was a guy called Rogers who filed a patent for a derived centre channel in 1961, but this was a playback only arrangement and quite different from the encode/decode matrix systems that Scheiber invented. Dolby's own encoder (used in the DS4 etc) works very differently from the QS encoding scheme, in that it uses a single 90 degree phase shifter in the surround channel and then applies this signal in phase to Lt and in antiphase to Rt. One other tid-bit of useless information - QS was also known as RM and was very similar to Sony's SQ system. Anyone interested in the details of these two sytems can refer to a US patent 4,021,612 which descibes a decoder suitable for both systems. You can view this patent by going to here and typing the patent number into the search engine.
------------------ Ray Derrick President/Chief Engineer Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-27-2002 08:55 PM
I am surprised that there are still Cat116 cards in service. The matrix decoding performance must be little better than, say, an Eprad processor.BTW I mentioned above "Sony's SQ" system. In actual fact the SQ system was developed by CBS, however Sony was probably it's biggest promoter so SQ came to be closely associated with Sony. Michael Schaffer mentioned he heard there were three competing quad systems. In fact there were at least four commercial matrix arrangements - SQ, QS, EV Stereo-4 and Dynaco. There was also a four channel discete disc format called CD-4 developed by Matsushita. I must apologise to Frank for my correction regarding Dolby's use of the Sansui matrix (in the early days at least). None of us has all the answers and one of the great things about this forum with it's many knowlegable contributors is that between us we can usually uncover the whole story. ------------------ Ray Derrick President/Chief Engineer Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 11-01-2002 10:09 PM
Christos, all electronic schematic diagrams are subject to copyright whether it is stated on them or not, and publishing them on the Internet (unless it is by the owner of the work) is not appropriate.In retrospect I should not have mentioned the Cat116 schematic as I did not want to give the impression that Steve (or anyone else on this forum) hands out the schematics of other companies willy nilly. All companies, inclduding my own, are very protective of their intellectual property and normally only supply schematics to those that have a legitimate need and are known and trusted. In this case the document could be considered historical in nature, and knowing that I would not use it for any purpose other than historical interest is why Steve sent it to me. ------------------ Ray Derrick President/Chief Engineer Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-01-2002 10:42 PM
In the case of THIS schematic...it was published and distributed with CP-50 manuals of the era. Furthermore, Dolby has shown no indication of hiding the schematics of this era (witness the pdf forms of the schematics they have available on their CD-ROMs at the trade shows and up here on Film-Tech. However, in the interests of this thread...there was nothing like the schematic to end the "Debate" about the whole "Did they or didn't they use the Sansui QS technology in the development of the Dolby SVA evolution". Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|