Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Using Flash Camera in Booth (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Using Flash Camera in Booth
Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 03-03-2003 10:32 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll ask her about that, Barry... I know the sign you're talking about. Will email.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2003 10:37 AM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Try taking the pics without the flash. Then find someone with Photoshop. Bring the pics in and adjust the "Levels" You can pull more out of that pic than you think. Also experiment with "Unsharp Masking". Don't over do either or the pic will get noisey and weird looking. Let me know if I can help

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2003 04:34 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of the optical cue dectors and failsafes may have a issue with a bright flash

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-03-2003 04:52 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like "no flash" is the safe way to go.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-03-2003 06:02 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Photoshop is only going to help so much on a dark, underexposed photo. Underexposed digital camera photos are especially problematic. They just tend to be very grainy by default. Using Photoshop to ramp up the levels may only amplify the pixel noise. Sometimes if I have to resort to such work, I'll try shifting the image over into L*a*b color space and tweaking the lightness channel's curve. Adjustment layers and layer blending techniques can also help.

You might have better luck with a carefully shot film camera photo (particularly if you use a tripod and time exposure). That can do wonders for controlling your grain and getting a better black value in the photo. Otherwise a lot of it just goes grey.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-03-2003 07:17 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
You're using all the stuff from your old "forward scan" system... except you're installing an LED that doesn't provide anywhere near the gain you had
No, you're right; that's precisely the problem with those, Jack, and why they're not a good idea. You're bringing a nearly non-existant signal (and noise floor) up to death levels... just like Michael J. Fox did in the first scene of "Back to the Future".
[Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-04-2003 12:44 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think I've used a flash on 35mm only a few times in the last several years. I've got a little 4" tall tabletop tripod on the camera, I just put it on program, set it down on a windowsill or armrest or whatever, hit the timer, & hold my hand behind the eyepiece.

The Polaroid pictures still use the flash. I'd like one of the new Kodak digital cameras, but the Polaroid makes me so popular when I use it. Folks love a picture they can hold in their hand. ("Take a picture of us so I can take it home!")

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-04-2003 12:49 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Long exposures in a fairly dark booth look the best. A 4 second or longer exposure usually results in a cool picture with nicely defined LED lights, etc.

The top deck of a platter can be handy if you don't have a tripod. Just engage the motor so it doesn't move. The top of consoles also work well.

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 03-05-2003 02:04 PM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I once opened a new theatre and had many people come around to take pictures of the inside of the projection rooms. Once, somone took a flash photograph of my main screens projector and it set off the end sequence shutdown. Evidently the light from the flash was enough to trigger a pulse from one of the opto sensors. Ever since then, I've always isolated the end sequence unit if anyone is going to take a photograph.

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Bernardi
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Antrim, NH, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


 - posted 03-05-2003 02:20 PM      Profile for Ray Bernardi   Email Ray Bernardi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I tried the lighter deal, I've tried the flash again, and I've tried shining a flashlight directly at the photo cell. I can't make that thing pop or hiss at all. The only way I can get it to pop is to cut off the light to it. Wave the corner of an index card in front of it for example. It leads me to believe the sound is actually made when the light hitting the sensor is blocked out. Looking at the sound track makes me believe that even more. (Understand I'm just learning, if I'm wrong don't yell at me!)

EDIT: It's wrong. It reads the light.

Again, using an old sound head with white light.

I still think the flash is safe, in my case even with the sound doors open. I assume there are other systems where the stray light could be a problem. Perhaps when I can afford something more expensive I'll actually run into one of these! I can only hope!

[ 03-05-2003, 03:58 PM: Message edited by: Ray Bernardi ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-11-2003 10:19 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've had great results using the very fast Kodak MAX Versatility Plus (EI 800) film for available light photography. Unless you're going to make really large enlargements, the graininess is very reasonable for such a high speed film:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/consumer/products/techInfo/e2452/e2452.shtml

http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webCatalog.pl?product=KODAK+35+mm+Films

A strobe will usually cause a "pop" in the analog sound if the light falls on the photocell. Likewise, flourescent lights and even tungsten lights (especially those on an SCR dimmer) will cause a hum or buzz in the sound if they are picked up by the photocell.

[ 03-11-2003, 01:28 PM: Message edited by: John Pytlak ]

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-11-2003 11:37 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I should have explained that these shots (if they happen) will be taken with a consumer-grade digital camera. There won't be any time to set up a tripod or do anything else elaborate. It will be point-and-shoot. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-11-2003 01:30 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some digital cameras have pretty good capability for available light exposures with long exposure times. If you can't use a tripod, just hold the camera steady on a firm surface.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-11-2003 01:36 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How fast is the lens on that camera and what is its rough equivalent to film speed (ASA)?

I've never had a problem with using a flash camera in the booth as long as the soundhead doors are left closed.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-11-2003 01:42 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heh. I don't own the camera yet ( [Wink] to JP). Lens not likely going to be any faster f2.0, more likely f2.8 or thereabouts. Most of the cameras I've been looking at claim ISO 100, 200, and 400, although in flash mode they may be locked (100?). Sorry I don't have more details for you. I'm sure I could just point and shoot and get reasonably good snapshots (especially after doctoring them with Photoshop). I was really more concerned about the bright flash going off in an operating booth environment.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.