Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Whats wrong with this picture (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Whats wrong with this picture
Michael Cunningham
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: Anchorage, AK
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-19-2003 10:38 AM      Profile for Michael Cunningham   Email Michael Cunningham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah, thanks for the clarification Scott, that makes a lot more sense than what I was trying to envision, heh. Even with the bit of modification work and limited utility that still sounds like quite the useful innovation.

- Mike

 |  IP: Logged

Don Olson
Film Handler

Posts: 20
From: Seattle WA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 03-20-2003 12:17 PM      Profile for Don Olson   Author's Homepage   Email Don Olson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have moved hundreds of prints this way. Some platters wind them up tighter than others. You need to put something in the center ring to keep it in place. Jammed into the gap. Then put a plastic spatula under to get it started. If it feels solid when you start......go for it. If not......use two people and keep it horizontal. It's all in the technique.....Plus you need to be tall enough and strong enough. More than 8 reels is very dangerous. I tried to move a 70mm print of Close Encounters ( the remake with added scenes) alone one night. I got it just off the platter and it drove me to the floor. I was laying there, pinned under, it when a pal came looking for me. Together we were able to get me out and move it down the hall.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-20-2003 12:45 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeez...what did you expect with that mass of film which would be difficult to lift even if in a convenient form, which a platter roll is not?

As a general question:

Must everything revolve around taking shortcuts to save 3 seconds here, 5 minutes there?

Look at the discussion about single sided splicing. Why...why...why?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-20-2003 12:48 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Awwwww, come on Steve. Haven't you ever moved a plattered 70mm print of Titanic by yourself? Just slide it off and flip it over your shoulder. No big deal. It's only about 4 feet in diameter and about 200 pounds. Again, no big deal.

Of course I'm kidding though. That would be suicide. I would make further comments, but I need to save a few seconds so I'll skip typing any further.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-20-2003 12:56 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, but I know someone with a 70mm print of Lawrence, kept in two platter rolls. But I doubt he tries to move them single handed.

Maybe if everyone asked themselves if this was my personal print of my favorite movie, would I:

  • Move it platter to platter solo (if more than a moderate length)
  • Build it with single sided splices
  • Put foreign matter on it to show the breaks
  • Use anything but clear tape
  • Try to break it down while running it

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-20-2003 01:00 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I think you may have stumbled upon something that will be repeated time and time again on these forums. If it was YOUR print, would YOU treat it like that? [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-21-2003 07:45 AM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don, you must be CRAZY!!!!
How on earth did you expect to be able to move that print on your own?

How many 70mm screens are you running to require a swap? We only have one. (well 2 if the dts only one is included)

I get in trouble (well not trouble, but 'you should not be doing that on your own') from everyone (floor staff/management) for swinging a 5 reeler (35mm) off the platter and walking through the foyer with it without help.

Anything over 6 reels, I make sure I get help and we move it in a sleeve/envelope.

But to do it with a a 2 hour + 70 mm, Im sure you are NUTS!!! [Smile]

Bill.

BTW: With very few prints available these days in 70mm I think that is bad to handle the film that way - However you WERE joking right?

 |  IP: Logged

Glen Rich
Film Handler

Posts: 55
From: Nedlands, Western Australia
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-21-2003 10:51 AM      Profile for Glen Rich   Email Glen Rich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When it comes to moving film from the plates ,between boxes I have a large wood and laminate film carrier which the film slides off the plate and into .To reduce the chance of scratching I've stuck a few bits of felt to the underside of the centre rings .
The use of film carriers is common in most cinema's here ,(Australia) ,with some people making there own to fit the larger prints.
Working in a single projectionist per shift box I've never had a problem moving prints with a carrier regardless of size,(though I've never had to deal with 70mm ).
If I came in and found one of the reverse shift operators moving a print without a carrier they'd get a serious kick up the rear end .
Having said that ,what do you mean by a film "clamp".

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-21-2003 11:00 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Glen, Look in the "TIPS" area for info & pics on clamps. To me, they look kind of ill-conceived, but what do I know.

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 03-21-2003 01:24 PM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Haven't you ever moved a plattered 70mm print of Titanic by yourself? Just slide it off and flip it over your shoulder. No big deal. It's only about 4 feet in diameter and about 200 pounds.
It would weigh 33 percent more than me. I could see the headlines -- "Man freed after being trapped all night in a projection booth after being pinned under a 70mm print of Titanic". [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-21-2003 01:30 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's too long Evans! It'd have to read:

MAN TRAPPED UNDER TITANIC

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-21-2003 01:33 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The captain always goes down with the ship, Evans.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Schoell
Film Handler

Posts: 47
From: Paynesville, MN, USA
Registered: Jul 2001


 - posted 03-22-2003 11:10 PM      Profile for Peter Schoell   Email Peter Schoell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I recall some companies are making "platter disks" that are thin rigid doughnut-shaped disks that can be placed on the platter when a print will need to be moved. The film is wound up normally on top of the disk, and the disk is simply lifted up with the film on top and transferred to another platter.

Who are the manufacturers? Kelmar? Goldberg? Speco? Stuart A/V? Others?

--------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist

Being an owner (tightwad) I made some discs like this about 12 years ago. I just cut a couple of sheets of aluminum, one for the top one for the bottom. I laid the bottom one on the platter before taking up, then the top on at the finish. For extra security I'd made some clamps out of the left over aluminum. The whole thing was a little overkill, but I was able to move even a bad (perf damage) print without a problem.
The clamps are about 4 inches wide and were formed by bending them over a 2x4, they then fasten together with 2 strips of velcro at right angles to each other. The whole thing was under $20.00

I don't use the discs anymore , but still use the clamps once and a while. I've since made some horse shoe shaped carriers out of 1/4 inch masonite I can slip under the whole print. These are better because I don't have to think ahead, and even better they were only $5.00.

 |  IP: Logged

Patrick de Groot
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 161
From: Sprang-Capelle, Netherlands
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-23-2003 05:21 PM      Profile for Patrick de Groot   Email Patrick de Groot   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Glen, Look in the "TIPS" area for info & pics on clamps. To me, they look kind of ill-conceived, but what do I know.
Uhm is that take-off unit fixed?? That realy is a bad thing... When moving a print I remove the take-off unit, lift up the ring a bit to release the pins from the holes and slide it over the edge of the platter with one hand under the print and one holding the ring. No problems with moving prints up to 7 reels when winded up thight... The same with 9, but then I'm extra cautious.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 11-03-2010 11:28 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 2782 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.