|
Author
|
Topic: DTS OR DOLBY DIGITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 07-26-2004 10:40 AM
I used to be pro-DTS all the way, but have since changed to mixed feelings between DTS and SRD for various reasons.
I used to like DTS better because it never dropped out. But that was before I learned of all the little adjustments on a Simplex that would rub off the SRD if not adjusted correctly. The Simplex Millenium circa 1998 without the intermittent shoe modification was notoriuous for this.
My main gripe with DTS right now are those STUPID DVD CASES that they ship the discs in!! They are ALWAYS smashed to bits in the can, sometimes with the discs out of them. Did anyone give them feedback on these? Why are they still using them? In this case, the discs are so damaged that DTS drops out.
As for SRD, if you will be running a lot of arthouse prints or international films, SRD is pretty much the standard digital format. On the used prints we've been getting recently, the SRD track looks fine visually most of the time, so I'd assume it would play fine. OTOH, we've gotten many instances where we didn't get discs for DTS, or they were damaged, or the wrong ones.
So it's really a "crap shoot" if you're second run, where there's a tossup between getting the discs and not having the SRD track damaged. But for a first-run or arthouse theater, I would say SRD is your best bet.
If DTS would ship their discs in something the size of an actual reel, (Reel 0?) and the people in charge would fine the theater as if the print was missing a reel, maybe more discs would get shipped back.
It seems like Dolby Digital is the format that will "prevail" in the end in some form or another.
=TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|