Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Best Price on 35-SS Splicer (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Best Price on 35-SS Splicer
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-30-2007 06:59 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know Bill...I think your time frame is way off and precision is precision...if a splicer isn't precise, it makes bad splices.

As to DCinema...you guy really should look at what is driving the technology....both SXRD and DLP are funded and driven by the consumer market place...in particular, Rear Screen Projection TVs that is the ONLY market that has the numbers to support these technologies....that market is about as dead as CRTs...with flat panel displays winning out. If in the next year or two at the most, these technologies die...where does that leave DCinema? Not TI or any other semi. manufacturer can produce these products in the low volume that cinema will need...not just for the conversion but as a sustaining product where if even all cinemas were converted in the US (37,000) that the annual product sold after that (to the USA) would be on the order of 3500 chips...maybe...to deal with new builds and replacements. So now add in the rest of the world...you still don't get into the millions of chips that TI or anyone would need to manufacture the parts. Don't expect DLP prices to continue to fall...expect them to rise.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-30-2007 03:03 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
Not TI or any other semi. manufacturer can produce these products in the low volume that cinema will need...not just for the conversion but as a sustaining product where if even all cinemas were converted in the US (37,000) that the annual product sold after that (to the USA) would be on the order of 3500 chips...maybe...to deal with new builds and replacements.
Thats a pretty ludicrous assumption. Indeed producing this equipment and parts won't be any different than when Dolby, DTS, or Panastereo designs and markets a new cinema processor or server or when Analog Devices designs and marlets a new I.C... there will be customers for all these things... there always has been and always will be, ultimately thats why these companies survive. There will also ultimately be upgrades that can be done to what will be by then the existing 37,000 light engines with higher quality chips as technology permits and thats 37,000 just in the U.S. but in the millions world wide eventually. Indeed D-Cinema projectors will find their way into many other venues as well. Assuming that the Cinema end of things is consumer driven is also just another assumption although no doubt some of the cinema technology rubs off on the consumer end of things... the DMD chip was originally a Cinema Development not a consumer development!. You'll more likely find the Cinema end driven by the R&D end of these companies. All of these companies have R&D going on that none of us here are capable of even imagining and these companies have the $$ to sink into it. If they didn't do big time R&D they'd all vaporize and disappear in a very short time. I will also add that the consumer market isn't what makes these huge companies go round. Its the government/industrial end which vastly dwarfs the consumer end of things.

quote: Steve Guttag
Don't expect DLP prices to continue to fall...expect them to rise.

Well then perhaps you can explain the whole new generation of less expensive D-Cinema projectors??? It doesn't take an 80 grand projector to light up a 40 foot screen any longer. I could list many reasons such as more simplified manufacturing processes, higher efficiency reflectors, prisms, and consolidated electronics but one of the main reasons is the development of the .98" DMD chip. One can buy a very high quality 2k projector today for about 30 grand less than a year ago! The actual DMD chips are but a tiny cost of an entire projector, in fact the lamp reflectors or light integrator costs more to buy than a DMD chip does! The real expensive part is the prism block that the light engine is based on and the cost of the software to make it all operate, the rest of the hardware is a small portion of the total cost.

Mark

[ 10-30-2007, 04:07 PM: Message edited by: Mark Gulbrandsen ]

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-30-2007 04:08 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The digiprojector in our booth is by far the most expensive and the LEAST reliable thing in the room. The damned thing didn't work out of the box---several connectors were mis-wired, the factory tech couldn't figure it out. The on site installation tech and our electronics wiz sorted out the factory screw ups. Pretty obvious that it was never tested in any way before it was boxed and shipped. Cooling issues, flaky switches, processors that get confused, lamps that time out mid show, douser that fell apart, more. When we need it, we have to turn it on in the morning in order to coax it thru all the problems to have it ready by evening. Calls to the factory and its reps bring nothing substantive in the way of fixes, mostly long pauses and
uh huhs on the other end. This technology is a looooooooooooooooooooog way from being ready for prime time. No, I'll not name it, in hopes the mfgr. will eventually do some good.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-30-2007 05:00 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

If you don't name the manufacturer here I would say your complaints are unfoundedand without proof and most will think you're just barking up a tree. One of the best things about F-T is needling the manufacturers into giving you the service you expect and deserve. I've done that many times here and its worked well many times.

In SLC with well over 60 DC screens and every piece of gear under the sun running I just don't hear any stories like yours, in fact one local chain has gone thousands of shows without a hitch. Another good example is the Carmike in Billings that has gone over 1 year without any lost screen time at all. There is no doubt in my mind that it is extremely reliable from my experiences.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-30-2007 06:05 PM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can say that our solution from AccessIT has proven very reliable in the past 2 years (well almost 2 years).

There were many initial issues that once worked through everything was fine (i.e. various out of the box or first few hours of operation failures).

There are still a few recurring issues that my staff has learned to catch early and get the techs in to replace the parts, but other than that everything else has been running perfectly fine.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-30-2007 06:33 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, you're absolutely right.

The machine is a
BARCO DP100

A local company that is a Barco dealer is presently attempting to
get results from Barco. I believe the local company is quite competent, Dumbco is another matter.

I must admit that when it is finally coaxed to life, we have found it to do a pretty good job.

IMO the engineers on this thing deemed it finished and went home at noon when they should have stayed till five and completed the project.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-30-2007 06:56 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

I think posting that on here is a good thing. Lets expose the fly by nights if they indeed are... Either they will fix it or they won't. There are quite a few DP-100's here in SLC and they all function extremely well. In fact the local chain that has the majority of DC installations says they actually prefer Barco to NEC as far as dealing with the company, reliability, and image quality. Their last shipment of 8 NEC's had three that were DOA. There are DP-100's in Dolby's and other important screening rooms as well. CLACO recently purchased a used DP-100 for installation at an independents location for Thanksgiving and it performed well where it was removed from... a plex that went all Christie/AIX.

I find DC gear to be somewhat like Broadcast Equipment... a 50/50 chance that it will work out of the box. Its not that its all that complex really... I just think that the assembly folks are not versed well enough in the products they assemble.

Personally I'd get BARCO in to work on the problem rather than a local company. Factory people have a huge advantage over independent service people.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-30-2007 11:50 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Thats a pretty ludicrous assumption.
Sorry Mark...not an assumption...I talk to people in TI...not the press releases designed to build up the product.

quote:
the DMD chip was originally a Cinema Development not a consumer development!.
Also not true...the big pot of gold for the DMD was always the consumer. A/V and Cinema are considered additional revenue streams for these sort of imagers. They are not large enough markets to support DMD manufacture, but do provide additional revenue from the DMD technology.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
All of these companies have R&D going on that none of us here are capable of even imagining and these companies have the $$ to sink into it.
Perhaps YOU have not looked into why and how these companies have put in R&D into these technologies....I have...at least on the DMD end of things.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I will also add that the consumer market isn't what makes these huge companies go round. Its the government/industrial end which vastly dwarfs the consumer end of things.
Bzzzt wrong again. Depending on the technology, yes the government can "create a whole division" if some technology is needed. It isn't necessarily the cheapest way to get something. Industrial almost never has the numbers that the retail/consumer end has to get things in a "economy of scale" status. Again, it depends on the program...in the case of DMD...it was the consumer market that was the drive and the potential payoff.

But what the heck...don't believe me...thats fine...we'll see in a couple of years where the technology goes.

The 35SS splicer will still be making good splices if taken care of!

 |  IP: Logged

Max Biela
Film Handler

Posts: 89
From: Dortmund, Germany
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 10-31-2007 08:25 AM      Profile for Max Biela   Email Max Biela   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anybody know where to get the 2 frames version of the Splycemar? I contacted the manufacturer directly but had no luck.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-01-2007 08:28 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,
I love it the way my posts bring out the best side of you [Big Grin] .

In fact you are dead wrong though... The industrial side of the semiconductor biz does easily 10 times the volume of the consumer end of things yearly. Avionics alone is as large as consumer, then you have government consumption where just the military end alone is larger, there is the auto industry electronics, all the transpport industry related electronics and so on . So yes, its the industrial folks that actually make it all happen with the buck!!

As for the Splycemar... I've compared two side by side with a Neumade and I couldn't see any difference at all except in the label. All three had the samne metal handle, none rolled over the screws. I think the composite handle someone was talking about was the one produced by chubby Chuck Shoemaker some years ago.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 11-01-2007 09:46 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They did ship an incorrect handle for awhile that rolled over the screws. Lucky Chuckie's handle broke before it could roll over the screws. I sent all thee wrong ones back. Newer handles are OK enough, unless thrown.

As regards Cinema Video, I agree with Steve; that is what I was told. Display technologies are driven by consumer demand. You may well be right on other electronic/computer technologies, but not on video. The "pot o'gold" may well be Billions.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-01-2007 05:51 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Louis,

That is what I meant... the semiconductor biz as a whole. Its too hard to single out just a certain part of the biz and talking to any one person of any goup is really meaningless since a given group within a large company is going to be very self biased. The One major thing that Steve failed to think about is the flight simulator end of the biz which has consumed more 2-K DMD chips than the entire D-Cinema field has so far. Some sims take as many as a dozen 2K projectors running simultainously. The consumer chips are also entirely different than what is used in D-C although the same chips are used in Flight Sims as in D-C. There is a huge company here in SLC that builds the display part for most the large flight simulators.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 11-01-2007 06:41 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You would think the simulators could use any old cheap chip since about the only thing they ever show is the white inside of a cloud until you get within 200 ft of land. [Big Grin] Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-02-2007 10:16 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Steve failed to think about is the flight simulator end of the biz which has consumed more 2-K DMD chips than the entire D-Cinema field has so far.
Aren't the flight sims the ones who brought us Cinerama? Which I guess is why we all have three projectors in our booths [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-02-2007 10:34 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
However, Mark, unlike you, I HAVE talked with people within TI and have specific knowledge on the DMD division...you, on the other hand, clearly don't know what you are talking about on this issue. I was never referring to the semiconductor industry as a whole...which is a tangent you brought up to divert the discussion into something meaningless. The facts remain, the DMD division on TI was banking on rear-screen projection TVs...and that is turning out to be a failed attemept as this year looks to be the last for any significant RSPTV sales. TI is said to be looking to spend upwards of $100M in advertising to extend its life as long as possible.

I'm not wishing gloom and doom on DLP or SXRD, for that matter. I much prefer the look of DLP to LCD, for sure...especially for front projection. My sources, just don't paint a rosy picture for the whole DMD division. It is definately not something one should bank their livelihood on.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.