Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Zenith ZX4000H too Dark (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Zenith ZX4000H too Dark
Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-04-2007 08:18 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just a wild shot in the dark (no pun intended) there is a small heat plate of waffled metal behind the apperture
I have seen a machine with an incorrect on fitted and that cut down the light dramaticaly
Also measure the width of the shutter blade and compare it to another machine

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-04-2007 08:36 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is this a double shutter projector? If so, it is possible to have more blades closed than the amount you want. In fact, you could have complete darkness if completely unlucky. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-05-2007 01:22 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I will check on the width of the shutter blades and also on that small heat plate of waffled metal to see if it installed correctly.
Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2007 09:58 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Louis the vic 8 is not made with a double shutter. It uses a standard twin blade shutter. There are two versions of the shutter blade one with slightly larger blades but that would not cause the loss of light that is being suggested.

There is one thing I did not see mentioned and that is the lamp adaptor that is fixed to the negative end of the lamp. These are needed to allow different sizeed lamps to be used. The wrong one will result in a dramatic loss of light.

Are you sure you are using the correct length adaptor?

What condition is the heat filter glass in is it very old and scratched.

This lamphouse does not use a very large sized mirror so if it's installed correctly then there will not be an issue with light passing in and onto the gate. There is no part on the vic 8 that would get in the way, apart from the safety and changover shutters.

If it is as bad as you say then it can only be something so obviouse that you're missing it as this is a very good lamphouse over all [Roll Eyes]

What about lenses....

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-11-2007 01:14 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The adaptor is the correct one. I even re-ordered an adaptor for the 4K bulb that is used to re-check it and it was the same as the one we had installed. I am leaning towards the shutter blades being too big. This projector always had an issue even with the old Vertical lamphouse that was used. When we reinstaleld that lamphouse on a V10 the light was superb.
Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Neil Davis
Film Handler

Posts: 1
From: Hemel Hempstead, Herts, United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 06-16-2007 03:52 PM      Profile for Neil Davis   Email Neil Davis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Have you tried removing the 1.85 lens and running the projector, lamp on, in a 'black ball' alignment mode?

you should have a black ring in the middle of the screen (Cathode cap) and this is in effect eclipsing the plasma ball from the xenon. do the x/y alignment so the light from the plasma is right 'behind' the black circle, then adjust focus so the ring of light is as neat as possible around the ring. Does this help things?

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-16-2007 04:16 PM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings All from Cambridge

I have to take issue with Kenny McEverett and his statement that this is a good lamphouse overall. It is not. It is dreadful. Put a 4kW lamp in this lantern and just watch the mirror blister.

Check the reflector coating. I bet all around the opening of the mirror there is no reflector.

Goodnight

David

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-19-2007 11:03 AM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you're sure the working distance is right and the lamp gives good light with a V10, something is probably fishy with the V8 projector.
Was the V8 a 35/70 machine? The 70mm shutter is different and passes less light in 35mm than the 35 only shutter. Try comparing it to another machine where you have good light.
Do you have the original (Galileo?) mirror? A substitute might work better with the V10's barrel shutter light path.

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-19-2007 11:46 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From what i recall, and from what the manager told me, this projector never played 70mm but I would find it strange if it is equipped with a 70mm shutter! My last resort is to change the projector head with one from a closed down cinema. Is the last test I will do in order to decide if the problem is finally at the projector or the lamphouse.
Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-19-2007 12:20 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Barrel shutters are inherently "lossy." Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-19-2007 01:33 PM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The V8 Carries a conical type shutter and not one with straight fins like the V4, V5 model. The barrel type I've only seen on the V10 model.
Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-21-2007 04:47 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David I stand by my comments in that in my experience it is a good lamphouse. Simple to use and maintain and a good light.
And being a metal mirror it's not quite so painfulk if a lamp fails.....

I have not however used one with a 4k lamp in it. The max I've used is 3k and it performed very well. Good ventilation is, as with all lamphouses, a must!

Certainly if the mirror has been overheated and blistered the light output will fall.

It certainly does not deserve to be called dreadful!

The vic 8 shutter while conical presents each blade behind the gate in the same way as a 'flat' shutter and is therefore no more or less efficent. I have changed the shutter in the past to the larger bladed, 70mm, version and cannot say there was a very noticable difference in the light on screen.

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-24-2007 03:25 AM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings Kendall

I disagree. Everyone knows that this lantern is a heap of poo. No doubt you consider the xenon converted Super|Zenith450L an adequate lamphouse as well.

David

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-24-2007 09:31 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David you are entitled to your opinion but I would appreciate it if you would use my name and not make assumptions on my behalf.

There are a number of ways at evaluating projection equipment it's 'poo' rating is not one that I am aware of.

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-24-2007 03:29 PM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings Kennilworth

I am indeed entitled to my opinion, and will have my say whenever possible. Having experienced your performance in the box and on installations you will no doubt be aware ofthe poo rating - a scale on which you invented yourself!

From Cambridge

Goodnight

David

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.