|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Adding trailers to platter (photo)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 12-20-2005 08:54 AM
I tried to keep my own opinion neutral when I posted that picture. Myself, I don't like adding trailers this way, but I can't 'fault' it. I think Steve summed it up best when he noted; "...[with] fewer booth staff to help out, and the continued demand of many owners for more work in fewer work hours, solutions like this one are a necessity ..."
Trailers change every week, and even the order the ads are shown sometimes change. Trailers added like this can be inspected (for misframes or even being on backwards) right away on prints that remain for next week. It needs to be known *now* if they are right, because the operator is required to go home (or downstairs) as soon as possible, but can fix it next show if needed. No one will put in a large takeup ring because that takes planning, and there's no time to plan ahead. There's so little time devoted to the booth that the trailers are added immediately when they come in, whenever that is.
Anyway, I thought more people would disapprove, but it's turning out that most approve, however grudgingly.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 12-20-2005 11:28 AM
At some theaters that had crazy people in charge of trailer programming, they would insist A trailer be removed from X feature and put on Z feature in spot #3, and B trailer be removed from Y feature and put on Z feature in spot #2, etc. What I would do is simply pull the trailers out of the center of the roll and carry them to the print it needed to go on and lay them into the pack doing multiple center drops on top of each other. Always worked like a charm and NEVER a hint of film damage. The Christie platters handle multiple drops at the same time magnificently and in 20 years of handling trailers in this manner, I have never had anything go wrong.
I couldn't do that when I was working with other platters such as Strong and SPECO that did not have the raised brain. (Examples of platters with a "raised brain" for lack of a better term would be the Christie, Neumade and MiT). They aren't too happy with the film not laying on the deck, so whenever a larger loop of film would be put into the pack, I would install it with an "S" twist to it. The "S" twist created a bulge toward the brain, but so long as the threading was smooth and relatively slow, actual payout was fine.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|