Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Recent release prints can look great with good projection! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Recent release prints can look great with good projection!
Jerry Axelsson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 107
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Registered: May 2005


 - posted 05-22-2006 06:58 PM      Profile for Jerry Axelsson   Email Jerry Axelsson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

What kind of projection equipment do they use at Studio Movie Grill theater?

I am especially interested in projector, lamp house and lenses.

How large are their screens?

J.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-22-2006 09:10 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I'm curious about that too. The website provides diddly information. (Photos would be a real plus, I'd think.)

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-22-2006 11:25 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll get pics up in a few weeks.

Kinoton PK60
Christie SLC
Christie AW3
Pennywise CA21
QSC amps and speakers
Harkness screens
Schneider lenses

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Ubilluz
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: boca raton,fl / United states of America
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 05-23-2006 12:34 AM      Profile for Martin Ubilluz   Email Martin Ubilluz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
it dosent matter that the lens was 1 year old or 5 years old lenses last 50 - 100 years. Also prints are outsourced sooo mush reel 1 is made inn canada reel 2 here reel 4 some where else. Print quality has rilly gone down the last years. Thats why more then ever you get reels that the digital in a certain reel will go out. I got two prints of davinci and on reel 2 the dolby digital went out so i played it in sdds and it went out lucky we have all 3 forms of digital and it played fine in dts but that just proves print quality is way down.
Keep the projector clean and optics clean and a good bulb focus and it lookes amazing no matter what projector you use. Of corse as long and you lens isent burnt.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-23-2006 05:47 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh geez. There are soooooo many more aspects to achieving a great picture than just keeping the lenses clean and bulb focused. [Roll Eyes]

By the way, you might want to get a competent technician in your theater to service your digital systems. It is EXTREMELY RARE for me to have any playback problems with SRD. Maybe 2 lab defective reels a year tops.

 |  IP: Logged

Anslem Rayburn
Master Film Handler

Posts: 476
From: Yuma, AZ, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-23-2006 07:06 AM      Profile for Anslem Rayburn   Email Anslem Rayburn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I love digital projection. I've even taken heat for it in the past.

I have, in fact, seen digital projection done wrong. From showing two feet on all sides of masking (top and bottom) to a bad bulb flickering worse than a 3,000 hour old 3K bulb. One movie got past another manager, even thought it was pixelated to hell. Turns out the "tech" didn't install a software upgrade, and it caused the movie to look like a pile of pooh. Anyone can fug up a good thing...

I am willing to concede that evey performance of a movie takes someone in the booth that cares about the presentation to make it worth my money...

But, having worked both film and digital, it is easier to fudge up any given film presentation than it is to fudge up any given digital presentation. I only have to be there for one night to set up the macros for a digital presentation* and make sure it looks good, and tell someone to press "START". If they fug that up, they don't belong in the building, let alone the booth. EVERY film presentation takes a professional for it to be RIGHT. We can't all find a Brad Miller or a Steve Kraus to run our films. We do the best we can. And if that makes us 'weaker' somehow, then so be it.

*And once per week to check light level (same as a film presentation)...

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 05-23-2006 07:48 PM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anslem, why do you need Brad Miller to run your films?

Are you saying your not giving your paying patrons the best presentation?

I don't work in a commercial Cinema, i just do previews for the Melbourne Film Festival, film critic screenings and film societies but I put on a top show even with our older equipment(although the lenses are new). I have sharper and brighter picture than any where else with same size screen as us.

I use Carbon-Arc [thumbsup] [Cool] , not Xenon [bs] [puke] [Wink] [Big Grin]

but I suppose I should throw it all away and steal myself a 2K Digital Projector since I have a less chance to "fudge" up the presentation.

It doesn't take much to put on a top show with 35mm you just need to be committed to it and sadly most multi/megaplexes are not. I mean late last year we had a grand spanking new multiplex open in the heart of Melbourne's CBD and guess what... dull, unsteady, out of foucus in the centre pictures and pretty lame weak sound. A brand new complex from the ground up, fancy that!

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Ubilluz
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: boca raton,fl / United states of America
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 05-24-2006 01:09 AM      Profile for Martin Ubilluz   Email Martin Ubilluz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

yes ther are many more aspects to having a good picture all im trying to say is as long as your projector keeps the image perfectly still and is spotless clean as well as the rollers the rest is up to the optics and bulb. Maby im wrong but ive used about 3 diffrent projectors with all the thing i listed perfect and watched films on diffrent projectors and i cant tell the diff.

and about the sound issue thats the same problem I have 2 or 3 reels a year with a digital problem but, for a movie as big as davinci code i dono. and you cant deny 5-10 years ago image, sound quality was much better
i never had that probelm and my doloby reader never goes above an error reading of 2, and for the digital in the sdds to go out too? we should boycott till they get there stuff to gether lol they dont care anymore they just wana get the film out make some money

hey dont be talkin shit about my technician Brad hes the man flys all over the US installing theaters and has installed the top 5 theaters in my area, and hes sexy [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Phillip Grace
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 164
From: ACMI. Melbourne. Australia.
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 05-24-2006 04:46 AM      Profile for Phillip Grace   Email Phillip Grace   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's my two-cents worth as to why the same print will appear different on different projectors, assuming 16 foot-lamberts and uniform apertures. First, colour temperature. There can be a significant spectral difference between xenon reflectors and a more blue image will appear brighter that a more yellow one. Those of you with carbon arcs will be able to try out this effect at home, by altering the crater position. Second. Gate design. Image steadiness has a marked effect on the perceived sharpness of the projected image. Accurate registration of successive frames is important. I would think that the Vic 5 with its short straight gate would be the least steady projector to be found anywhere. The fit of the film perforations to intermittent sprocket teeth is also critical. Kinoton achieve their remarkable performance with accurate sprockets. Third. Film Buckle. Also gate related. The difference in film flatness between first and second exposures, due to the partial cooling of the frame while the flicker shutter is closed, adds up to a high speed blurring of individual frames. Good gate design and adjustment are necessary to hold the film flat. Other factors would include viewing conditions, ambient light in the screen, condition of the screen.

That's all. I'll put the two cents in the mail tomorrow.
Phil.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-24-2006 04:57 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Phillip has some of the points down as to why different equipment provides better results. Let's also not forget things like heat on the film itself (glass reflector / water circulator / etc), port window quality, screen surface, and even the kind of film cleaning system you are using all have significant effects on the final image.

For the record, I have seen digital track issues consistently decrease as the years have passed. As far as the sexiness of your tech, who gives a shit??? The question is, does he truly know how to assemble a system that will provide the BEST final result?

BTW, the release prints of Over the Hedge are outstanding!!!

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-24-2006 09:45 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hopefully sooner or later we can look forward to some enterprising individual who will set up digital projection with a carbon arc lamphouse. (Come on! It's going to happen, it's just a question of time. Five years? Ten years? Forty years? It will happen!)

Of course, they'll need two projectors and there'll be digital cinema changeover when the arcs run low... [Big Grin]

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-24-2006 03:03 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
[steve]

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 05-24-2006 03:24 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now there's something for [steve] to work on:

A dual-carbon arc lamphouse setup with a single digital projection head. The changeovers would simply be on the lamphouse end. No cues - just change whenever you feel like it before the end of a trim or need to pull up. [Big Grin]

Sorry. We now return to our regular thread already in progress.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-24-2006 04:18 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmmmmmmmm

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-24-2006 07:55 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It wouldn't be without precedent. The original Eidophor video projector had a carbon arc lamphouse (a Ventarc, no less)...

 -

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.