Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » ShoWest 2006 Wearhouse Pictures (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: ShoWest 2006 Wearhouse Pictures
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 03-08-2007 04:31 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
China now produces more steel than the US, EU, and Japan....combined.

Nothing to scoff at.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-08-2007 06:04 AM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte,
The city I have an apartment in ,Changchun, has a major auto plant there. It is an Audi/VW plant. The majority of cars on the road were Audi A6's and VW Jettas. Almost every Taxi was an older Jetta. I met many people from Germany who were there to do work/training at the factory. I don't know if they will export them or not. The city's population is around 8 million.

Rick

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-18-2007 01:00 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whilst at Showorst I took some time to examine the Horizon Projector and came to the ultimate conclusion that it is exactly as I said in my original post... touch and go. The quality of the main casting is quite inferior on the unmachned areas where the exposed "Sand Casting" actually took on the appearance more of a "Gravel Casting". Its what you typically see in the inexpensive Chinese machine tools that are being imported today. Also there was quite a bit of film dust on the interior of the machne as was stated by someone else in this thread. The machine did have a nice solid sound to it while running but why on earth is it enclosed? That only serves to make cleaning it all the more difficult in todyas multiplex. The gear train appeared adaquate and the overall quality of the actual gearing which is similar to an X-L looks good but remains to be seen. To those that buy these machines time will tell. The platter is woefully inadaquate for a normal multiplex in terms of capacity but ran smooth. Another beef I have with this Chinese stuff is the woeful quality of the electrical components that are typically used.... just awful stuff. Over all I would say this is just an average projector.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-18-2007 05:05 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but what was the price and how does that price compare to a normal console/power supply/projector/platter setup?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-18-2007 05:19 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John,
Over the life of a theater or plex the price diffrence... any savings is for the most part is false economy!! Its not really all that important unless you are a real cheap skate. Most of our customers buy new projection equipment when it comes to new builds and the difference in cost of the Chinese machine over one you sell is really irrelevant. Again I judge it to be just an average projector... not one that I'd be selling to my customers anyway.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-18-2007 08:15 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...with using a glass mirror, the price of the mirrow is only $250.00(??) [Eek!] ... and using bulbs from 1k to 4.2k - wow, what versatility...

..and price of an intermittent assembly only $200.00(??) [Eek!]

Price for the platter version was $11k, whereas the all-in-one priced out at $13k

(from what the rep there told me on this - and I loved the upside down SPECO failsafe unit on that Horizon...that one really got me...but it'd be easy to clean that way..but did wonder why a unit was fully enclosed. And the one door assembly fully reminded me of the door on a one piece Monee [Eek!] )

[ 03-19-2007, 02:07 AM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Bevan Wright
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 176
From: Fountain Valley, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 03-18-2007 09:59 PM      Profile for Bevan Wright   Author's Homepage   Email Bevan Wright   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte, I'm afraid you are confused, MIT has never done anything with a Monee projector. Perhaps you are confusing us with LIT.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-19-2007 02:03 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
(Whoops, my bad - got the letters turned around and please accept my apologies to the Moving Images Technology company..need to be a bit more careful on such references)

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-19-2007 07:30 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi, Mark ... I hear you and agree that being cheap can be false economy. But with the generally low quality of films being released, poor percentages, digital on the way, etc, even owners who were not cheap may now be tempted to do things they otherwise might not do. They simply don't have the money and, 'saving' say, $2K times a 20-plex equals $40K.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-19-2007 07:44 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
But how do you upgrade something like this? In a standard setup, I can upgrade the parts individually (lamphouse, projector head, soundhead, platter, etc.). With this, you'd have to throw the whole thing away if you wanted to upgrade any part of it.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 03-19-2007 08:50 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott: you are correct.....you just don't upgrade. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 03-19-2007 10:24 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The heads are available open faced. Chinese manufacturers tend to sell systems as complete with many models / versions for specific uses; their normal enduser is not thinking upgrade or "new and improved" since the marketplace competitive incentive is not their mindset.
So buy now and throw away when digital is here [Razz] how many $39.95 progressive DVD players do you send in for service? [scream] You guys are hoping for that sound drum reverse scan upgrade kit for that W.E. Universal base projector should be ready any day...the market demands it!! [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-19-2007 01:24 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Richard Fowler
So buy now and throw away when digital is here
Richard, I did the first multiplex install of the Horizon projectors here, and that is one reason the theater went with this projector. The multiplex expects to switch over to digital in the future. Horizon even marketed the projector that way (to an extent) at the show last year when the debuted it. Not as a throwaway, but as a cheaper alternative.

Rick

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 03-19-2007 01:51 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rick,
as one noted equipment as "average", attractive price does help, depending on what side of the situation you are in. There are other "average" equipment in the market, with brand name frame, mixed with the obviously superior ( or comfortable ) product [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-19-2007 02:27 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Richard, With "hands On" experience, I will say these machines put out an excellent image. The stability rivaled a dual intermittent machine. [Wink] They had some design problems that we worked on, I hear they fixed them. I met at the factory in Harbin with the engineers last January, and then last year when they came to the states for Showest. They weren't familiar with multiplexes and I spent a week or so taking them around the states after the show. I haven't had any involvement with them since, other than chatting with the translator online every few weeks [Cool]

Rick

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.