Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Tips on screening rooms (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Tips on screening rooms
Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-25-2007 12:12 AM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good to know. I would definitely not want to get projectors I couldn't find parts for. Mark, I'm still curious about why you brought VistaVision up, can you elaborate?

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 11-25-2007 03:13 AM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Beverly
Just outta curiosity what does an ISCO Blue Star anamorphic projection lens run, (again budget)?
Mark has two points that are very important to think about. Lens quality and picture steadyness. With these two issues we are ultimatly talking about the maximum resolution possible. This aplies to both projectors and cameras.

If it is your own footage, especially first generation 35mm straight of the neg. Well apart from Marks vistavision gear, its hard to ever find a better image! I guess what I'm asking where is the value in compromising? before I answer your question with "alot".

What are you planning to do with sound? I'm a bit lost on whether you will ever run regular prints? As a modern red light reader is now required for the last few years worth of films made. Its quite possible a second hand projector would not have been modernised.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-25-2007 10:23 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well it's not so much compromise as what is possible at this point. If the ISCO is say a 20K lens just for the sake of argument, It' not a possibility, plain and simple, that money would be spent elsewhere like production and we would have to go with a different anamorphic projector lens. Now if that lens is a few hundred dollars and I have to wait until I could afford it, I would bit the bullet and do so. I guess what I'm saying is I want the best image I can afford, the "I can afford" being the operative words. I woulda LIKE to have had a brand new Arri BL4 with a set of Hawk anamorphics to shoot with BUT my budget over-ruled that as well. [Big Grin]

I need to project dailies with a reasonably close representation of what the image will look like in theaters and to see if what I'm doing production and editing wise is working on the big screen, if the focus is soft, if the movement is overwhelming, is the story being moved along by the cuts, does that scene that seemed to work on the KEM, actually work when projected by the Simplex (on whatever I end up getting), ect.

As for sound, The projector will be interlocked with a Magna-Sync sound reproducer, very old school because I don't want to go through the expense of an HD transfer and the equipment to edit on HD. (DV or HDV transfer is not a reasonable option) for us. It will be edited on mag reels and mixed down on a 24 track recorder then transfered to a M&E 35mm mag reel and a dialog mag reel.

Those will be sent to an audio post house and an optical sound print will be struck, the negative with a cut list will be sent to a commercial motion picture lab and the negative will be cut (I'm a little leary of doing that myself but I might change my mind as time goes on) and an answer print will be struck. If I DO have to modernize the sound head, I will do so as again my budget will allow for. Remember, I am new to projection so there are thing I do need to learn and I freely admit that....which is why I'm asking people like yourself who are actually in the know about such things. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-26-2007 08:35 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the ISCO anamorphic lists for about 3200.00 but dealers discount them for the most part..... I reccomend that you shop around for one and get the best price!!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Emiel De Jong
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: Geldrop The Netherlands
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-27-2007 07:20 AM      Profile for Emiel De Jong   Email Emiel De Jong   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No new tips here; I just like to hear of another Konvas user on this forum. I shot a short some 3 years ago on a Konvas 2M (at this moment there is a chance I finally can finish it, film all the way, in the near future). Here is a scan from the negative:

 -

The movie is about the frustrations of a chain-smoking projectionist. Maybe there is still some tip on screening-room equipment in this picture; Kinoton/Philips would be my favorite choice... [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-27-2007 08:06 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you will just be showing your own films, then you do not need the LED reader soundhead upgrade. Just be sure to order your release prints with either "silver" or "high-magenta" optical tracks. These are pretty much standard for small print runs, anyway, and will play fine on any soundhead. Obviously, none of this is an issue when running interlocked sound on the dubber.

What are your plans for sound--i.e. will you be mixing for mono, some variant of Dolby Stereo, or digital? If you will be doing multichannel mixes, you will need 2- 3- or maybe 6-track heads for the dubbers and also a mag preamp and some sort of processor, as well as (maybe) an outboard NR unit (or several). If you want to advertise "Dolby Stereo" or "Dolby Digital" (or "DTS" or "SDDS") with your films, you will need to look into licensing.

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 11-27-2007 05:54 PM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
$3200, Not nearly as scary as 20k! But you will still find that its probably the most expesive option.

quote: Steve Beverly
I need to project dailies with a reasonably close representation of what the image will look like in theaters
Well what you will be working with could potentially be of a noticably higher standard than avalable to even the best movie theatres. Prints made directly off the original neg are noticably better than release print quality.

Personally I guess you want to make the mag rig portable I would suggest a truck, a portable projection room on wheels! Can you wire the mag to more than 1 projector? Do you really need more than one projector, the few times I've run sync rushes, running seperate spools one at a time has not been an issue, cheaking the leader and the beep are in sync are a must see! ( In cinemas we spend our days tring to avoid letting the audience see leaders!)

If your in the position to order your own type of soundtrack, cyan readers are only important to know about before ordering your prints!

What sort of speakers, amps, audio processer?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-28-2007 05:21 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Beautiful shot Emeil, love the lighting, but I just have to wonder where you got the inspiration for you story [Big Grin] These little Konvas' are amazing camera, huh!

Here's what I've own sound wise for sound sweeting, FX and Dolby

AKAI Professional S950 Midi sampler with manual

LYNX Time Code Module with LYNX FILM INTERFACE MODULE with both manuals

DOLBY A Type Model 350 ENCODE/Record

DOLBY A Type Model 350 Decode/PB

JL Cooper MIDI MUTE with MIDI Ch 2 Modem

Calzone Case

 -

 -

I know this stuff is a little old but that's what I've got, as for a mixer, I have this dinasour TASCAM that I'm not even sure if it works so I'll probably have to replace that. I DOOO also JUST happen to have a 6 track head that is brand new in the box and came with my Film reproducers!

I have 2 of the film reproducers and a box truck I'm restoring to use as my camera truck which could be set-up to use as a portable projection booth as well.

$3200 buck is still way outta my price range for a projection lens, I guess I'll just have to wait ans see what comes up on Ebay. I saw an ISCO that went cheap today but I have something else I want to get so I'm saving my cash for that. As far as the licensing goes, it'll depend on what kind of a deal I make with a distributer once the film is completed, if he thinks it's a valuable sales tool, more than likely he'll pay to use the Dolby name, we'll just have to see. As for sound, given my limited budget, what would you boys recommend? I had thought maybe a home surround sound. I've got a pair of old movie theater speakers but have never tested them and their not huge. Their were meant to hang ans are kinda triangle shaped. I am open to suggestions but pleas remember this has got to be done on the cheap so older equipment that will work is definitely a consideration, probably a necessity!

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-28-2007 07:03 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Those Dolby NR units are the 360 model.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-28-2007 07:51 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not using the type A dolby and buying a pair of used CAT 280T's to master in Dolby SR would be very beneficial to what ever you do. Not only will it allow you a much higher quality end product ther eare also other factors to overdubbing and so on where SR really blows type A out of th water. I think you'll find that very few commercial houses use type A at all any more.
280T SR cards can be had for very reasonable prices!!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 11-28-2007 07:52 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, could you raise more money for your business venture?

Surely there must be investors out there and sufficient finance.

Why do everything on the cheap? I find the low-budget mentality really uninspiring.

Can I ask what's in the way of raising sufficient finance and doing it properly?

NB - this is NOT in any way a criticism of you, it's just an honest exploration of why in these cases the money never seems to be "there" to do things right.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-28-2007 08:37 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The cat. 280T won't help, since it doesn't have "encode" mode. He needs regular cat. 280s (or modified cat. 280Ts).

Also, he needs the Dolby box that does the 4:2 matrix encode. Not sure on the cat. number, but it's basically a reverse cat. 150 in a box.

Another option would be to just mix everything in "Woody Allen format" (mono with Dolby NR), which eliminates the need for the matrix encoder.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-28-2007 09:09 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yea, either SR cards will work... one with a simple mod... but what ever.... he'd be wayyyyyyyy better off with SR because of its more forgiving qualities.

quote: Brian Guckian
Surely there must be investors out there and sufficient finance.

Airline pilots are a good place to start for fund raising! Several got together and backed an indie feature back when I lived outside of Chicago. The film also turned out to be a minor sucess as well. The cash the pilots sunk into it allowed them to have pretty high production values and the film had a really good look to it.

Also, at least a few years back USL Labs still had some of the Ultra-Stereo Encoding stuff laying around so talk to CLint about that if you wanna do a stereo analog track.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-28-2007 09:28 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Weelll, Bri, let try and explain it to you, the thing about investors is they are investing and want their money back with a reasonable guarantee of profit in the shortest time possible which means very few want to invest in high risk ventures like film making ESPECIALLY if someone such as myself has no track record. Now I also live in El Paso, Texas which is not generally known as the nexus of the artist and cultural world so there are VERY few investors of any type here and what there are tend to invest outside of the area believing there is no talent worth supporting locally or donate to the more traditional artist institution such as the symphony and opera. Thirdly, investors tend to make demands, micro manage and take any profit from any artist venture they are associated with which generally does not sit well with the artist. Fourthly it is generally accepted that on first film independent productions it is self financed for the above reasons. There is the additional problem that there are NO support facilities in El Paso such as labs, post houses, audio houses, studios, film equipment rentals, ect. which means I have essentially been forced to create a small studio from scratch.

I have had the very good fortune to have a friend who live in Juarez just across the Mexican boarder and has a 10 ton and 8 ton lighting and Grip trucks with a large diesel genny parked at my facility. I have been able to gather over the last few years, 2 full 35mm anamorphic camera packages for A and B camera, steadyicam and animation shots, a steadicam package, a full Nagra sound recording package, a camera crane, a Brey 35mm motion picture film processing machine a Mitchell step printer, 2 KEM flatbed editing tables with all three head, scope, academy and widescreen, a Moviola film trim bin with sound ans picture splicers a High speed rewind, a camera truck, an MTM 35mm/16mm dubber, 2 Magna-Sync 35mm film reproducers with a projector sync unit, a Magna-Tech 600 35mm film recorder all of which I have paid for out of my own pocket or borrowed money for that I need to pay back. I still need to get a Moviola upright with 'scope bubble, an optical printer, 35mm projector w/ 'scope lens, an edge coding machine, various expendables, long shaft rewinds, a motorhome set up to do hair and make-up in addition to production funds and the 1000 and 1 pieces of support equipment a production requires on a film shoot as well as paying my studio's rent, phone and electricity.

So I'm sorry you find the low budget film making mind set so un-inspiring as I happen to find it positively religious and heroic, despite the enormous challenges, expense, disappointments and odds against us, we take what every we have and can get our hands on and make it work. THAT'S why I need things cheap, because there is SOOOOO FREAKIN' much money that has to be spent in order to make a film that it is MIND-BOGGLING. I have, by doing things the way I'm doing them, IE creating a mini film studio, allowed myself the possibility of making several films and bringing an industry to this God-forsaken wasteland. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-29-2007 01:55 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Beverly
the thing about investors is they are investing and want their money back with a reasonable guarantee of profit in the shortest time possible which means very few want to invest in high risk ventures like film making ESPECIALLY if someone such as myself has no track record.
Not always true Steve! In fact the Pilots that pooled their resources to produce the indie feature outside of Chicago were looking for no more than a tax write off. There are many others looking for the same... you just have to find them.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.