|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Advice Needed For Historic Theatre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-19-2007 08:45 PM
There are two types of restoration done... true to original, and restoration done to make better use of the existing property. A building still holds it's "Historical" status if done either way although I've been told that the Historical Status folks will certainly whine about it. While the people doing the renovation might want to keep things as they were... the Historical Satus ONLY holds in regard to the buiding exterior. Many a theater building has been drastically altered inside to accomodate among other things a complete working stage and or fly, stadium seating, elevators, HVAC, electrical, and so on. I can think of at least three Historical Sites, one in SLC, one in Orem UT that had flys added to the buildings, the Orem location had a second theater (screen) added attached to the south end of the "Historical" building. The Ogden Egyptian Theater restoration is also another good example of this where the main stage, dressing rooms, and too many other aspects to mention here were either altered or added to the interior. The projection booth was drastically altered and offices were built upstairs an elevator added and so on. All three of these sites still have "Historical Landmark Status".
Should I list others... Oriental Theater Chicago...Oriental Theater Milwaukee, twinned... Palace Theater Chicago... Chicago Theater and on and on... all these locations maintained their major significent features but they also underwent major use, upgrade, and safety changes, and many changes to allow the operators of these buildings to make money to keep em going.
Mark
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler
Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007
|
posted 12-20-2007 01:55 AM
Indeed, you're correct, Stephen. There were a number of post-LPP titles that were released in 70mm, but my understanding is that the number of these prints that exist are quite slim (do any studios even have runnable prints of these titles for booking?).
But if someone wanted to run, say, SOUND OF MUSIC or OKLAHOMA! (the titles that people would rather see in 70mm), they'd either have to settle with a faded 70mm from original release, or run the new DTS 70mm (and with the latter, be able to run 30 fps). Of course, they could always run interlock, but that's a task in its own and I wouldn't recommend it unless they've got some super technicians and projectionists.
I also agree that a good booth should be set up to run any number of formats, but my point was that a theater on a budget that is just starting out might be limited in the amount of equipment they can purchase. A good theater starts small and works its way up. So to purchase 35/70s for the booth may be a good idea if this theater plans to invest in more equipment, but if they're just looking to start something up in general, it makes more sense to pick up a couple of 35s and upgrade later if it works out.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|