|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Has anyone run Dr. Zhivago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 03-28-2011 04:00 PM
Jack,
I saw the film yesterday, and I was disappointed by it; I've certainly seen digital look much better. The sky and snow had a very 'digital' look to it, similar artifacts to a DVD shown on a large screen, though much better in quality than a DVD. I've noticed before that grain in the original seems to encode badly, but I don't know why, since digital cinema does not use temporal compression. Overall, the film looked ok, but it wasn't anything special, unlike the 70mm prints which I've seen previously, and which are just about the best blow-ups from 35mm which I've seen.
The sound wasn't as good as I've heard on 70mm prints either. Right from the start, where the first few bars of "Боже, Царя Храни" ("God Save the Tsar", the old Russian imperial anthem) are played, which sound really impressive on 70mm, were less so on the digital, again it sounded ok, compared to a 35mm optical track it would have sounded good, but it wasn't as good as 70mm, or other digital that I've heard, and it wasn't as good as the two years older Cinerama track for 'How the West was Won', which I'd heard the previous day.
Each year at the Festival they have what they call 'Cineramacana', usually on Sunday morning, but on both Saturday and Sunday this year, where various odd clips are shown in various formats. On Saturday this year it started with a few minutes of a 'Bollywood' film; I've no idea what it was, it's not really my sort of film, and it was deafeningly loud. The costumes were very colourful, and the picture quality was very good; I didn't realise at first that it wasn't proper DC material. It looked at least as good as HD material that I've played from my laptop, if not better. It turned out to have been from a Blu-Ray disc, my first experience of the format. Ok, it was very different picture content to Dr. Zhivago, but I actually think that the picture content looked better. The picture quality on 'Dr. Zhivago' was probably what I might have imagined Blu-Ray might have looked like before I saw one. I was sitting close to the back of the auditorium, row k I think, for both screenings.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|