Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Oil and Oiling? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Oil and Oiling?
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-04-2008 11:18 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Beverly
BTW HHHOW MUCH does one that there fancy DLP PRO jecter set ya back??? 50, 80 150K
Just about the same price as one of Mr Guttag's fancy E Series Kinoton booths...

Or... Several of our customers look at it this way....

It costs about 80 grand or more a year for salary and all the other taxes and BS associated with having 4 booth idiots (similar to the one mentioned in Tim's post) attempting to run your 6 to 8 screen theater. So eliminate them along with the stupid extra costs like in Tim's post above. With the simple addition of a Show Library the manager and assistant managers can easily handle the operation of an all digital cinema say up to the 8 screen level without alot of hassle... DLP projectors do not suffer from focus drift nor do they need the framing adjusted! In essence they can literally be run day in and day out unmanned! That 80 grand a year you would be spending on incompetant help is offsetting your DLP expenditure and in 6 to 8 years your gear is completely off set. Contrary to what some people arouund here think the daily operating expense of a DLP booth can be EXACTLY THE SAME as an equivelent film booth.... possibly slightly less. Since all that equipment you paid for is also a buisness operating expense there are other tax incentives that also make this route even more desriable to consider. Also eliminating the booth mongers brings more of the service back to the dealer where it really belongs.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-05-2008 01:18 AM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah but the problem is digital technology is in constant flux, those 80 grand projectors might be worth 2 grand in 5 years and nothing in 7. There are projectors in theaters, as you are well aware of, that have been in use for 70 or more years and are still running perfectly, PLUS the image is much better on those old machine than the best DLP made. That's one of the reasons I bought a dallies projector, to check fine details, color, focus, etcetera, to see what the image REALLY looked like. I have digital editing software and a small digital projector, but I knew they would never give me what I needed. "Course now an 80 grand one might, I don't know but it's kinda academic, 'cause I don't have that kinda money for a projector, HELL I don't have money for a Century SA or even a Simplex XL, so I went with what I COULD afford and that's the problem with theaters. 80 grand is a LOT of money to lay out and then recoup and there's no real incentive to change because employee salaries are also deductible and from what Tim said it was the MANAGER that thought the oil pump was shot, that's the scary part.

If there IS one thing I've learn dealing with computers, they're just as easy to f*ck up as any other machine and, most of the time, much more difficult to figure out what wrong and repair it. There's no such thing as maintenance free machinery so NOTHING is gonna run day in and day out unmanned for any length of time and certainly not long enough to recoup the 80 grand initial cost.

But hey, you know FAR, FAR more than I do about projection so I would never presume to attempt to challenge your assertions and must bow to your experience and knowledge. If you say it would be better I'll just have to assume you are right. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-05-2008 01:50 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How are you "challenging" his assertions, though? He pointed out that in a multiplex you can save money by having less employees running the booth. Telling him that you personally won't save any money by switching and can't afford to switch doesn't even speak to the topic of his assertion.

Also, of course there will always be maintenance but if you have the same amount of $ spent on maintenance with less money on salary, you've obviously spent less money.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2008 09:07 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
Also, of course there will always be maintenance but if you have the same amount of $ spent on maintenance with less money on salary, you've obviously spent less money.
Other than vehicle expense... employees are the next MOST EXPENSIVE thing for a buisness like a multiplex. If you are stuck with Union goys the expense is much much greater than the norm.

The other nice thing at least about the Christie projectors is that you can purchase an extended warranty on each machine in extra 2 year increments. Its also actually pretty reasonable in cost but the extra warranty must be quoted at the time of the factory quote and purchased with the order. The ZX's we just sold have 6 year warranties on them! I don't know if NEC or BARCO do this but at the minimal cost that it is running its worth doing it.

BTW... We just bought a high end 3-DLP Christie projector off of E-Bay for 500 bucks! This will go into our rental department and make us quite a bit of dough at local conventions.... there are only one or two other 3-dlp projectors here in SLC for rent and demand fairly high. So Steve... the high tech stuff IS out there on the cheap if you look hard enough.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2008 11:57 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is a complete DLP installation still about $100k? If so, and if it lasts ten years, then it costs $10k/screen/year, not including maintenance and service contracts and such.

If you have a 10-plex, run 80 hours per week, and pay your operators $20/hour, the labor cost is $8k/screen/year.

If you make the assumption that a DLP system a) no longer requires an operator (since absolutely _every_ feature that you would ever want to book is available in the format, bulbs never need to be changed, nothing requires monitoring or regular adjustment, etc....right?) and b) is no more expensive to maintain than 35mm (cost of service contract and parts), then you are still paying more than $2k/screen/year extra.

This does make the assumption that the 35mm equipment is already bought and paid-for, but if we assume that a 35mm system that would be commonly found in a multiplex costs about $30k new (not including sound) and lasts for 30 years, it's still only $1k/screen/year.

I still don't see how the economics work (and how many theatres pay $20/hour for their regular operators?) for a mutiplex situation, unless the cost of a DLP system has come way down.

Admittedly, I can see how it would probably improve projection quality in may multiplexes, which is sad.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 01-05-2008 12:21 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So Mark, when all the film equipment is gone and DLP or whatever comes next is all in and no more maintenance, repairs or installations are needed, what will you be doing? HA! I believe you'll be busier than ever. When electronic projectors get many thousands of hours on them and are as numerous as film machines the problems will be just as many as film machines and not as readily fixed.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2008 12:31 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
Is a complete DLP installation still about $100k? If so, and if it lasts ten years, then it costs $10k/screen/year, not including maintenance and service contracts and such.

No! The best gear can be installed for about 80K per booth, less in quantity(obviously). There are so many other things to factor in(or out) related to employees if you look at the big picture and it varies by State... things like sick time, lost work time, payroll expenses, taxes involved over and above the salary you pay... with Union dudes you also pay half the years salary into the union retirement fund IN ADDITION to the normal wages, then there is all the hassle involved in employee scheduling and the expense involved by management there, unemployment taxes, equipment that breaks down because the paid employees can't or don't know how to maintain it properly... like in Tim's post... I see more of that expense in my travels around than all other types of failures! The list literally goes on and on. Believe me if you could get a decent union operator for 8 grand a year don't you think the unions would still be running all the booths actross the USA? So the 80K is is the amount of offset that two of our customers arrived at more or less independently of each other. One has about 80 screens and the other about 130. The latter chain has more trouble because of booth people comming and going than any other chin I've ever delt with... booth employees change about every two weeks there, they discover quickly that McDonalds pays better and the charm of the archaic film gear wears off quickly on all but the biggest of AV CLub fans.
quote: Bill Enos
So Mark, when all the film equipment is gone and DLP or whatever comes next is all in and no more maintenance, repairs or installations are needed, what will you be doing? HA! I believe you'll be busier than ever. When electronic projectors get many thousands of hours on them and are as numerous as film machines the problems will be just as many as film machines and not as readily fixed.

I don't see myself as being any more or less busy but at least the repairs will HAVE TO BE DONE by competant technicians. I can't speak for BARCO and NEC but the folks at Christie have kept the actual booth service time down to a minimum over what I've seen of the other two brands.... Christie's units are much more ergonomically laid out and its incredibly easy to replace any part including the Light Engine, BARCO's light engine is also very easy to replace but BARCO's gear suffers from other major quirks including parts being harder to get than either NEC or Christie. The Christie service manual actually states the replacemnt time for many of the assembleys and or parts and after having been to their training class I would agree with the time assessments they give. How fast parts can be gotten is strictly up to the manufacturer...BARCO is by far the very worst here... but when a dealer has several hundred of the same units in the field its certainly wise for him to carry the major parts on his shelf as the norm. Otherwise you might be down a day at best while waiting for a major part... The AIX/Carmike agreement states a maximum of 4 hours down time before a projector/server is back up and running... how closley they've been able to adhere to that I can't say but a day at worst case would be the norm.... again not much different than a film system.

P.S. With a booth full of the same gear you also have access to multiple other parts borrowed from other projectors/servers to aid in diagnostics if needed... however all of the projectors and servers have extensive "log reports" available to aid both the technician and manufacturer in diagnosing all sorts of problems. Eventually, experience for all will grow over time and we will resume our "instinct diagnostics" ability like we've always done.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 01-05-2008 03:30 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll attest to BARCO's slow parts response---about 2 weeks, no shortage of "quirks" either. I couldn't imagine having to rely
on this thing for every show.

[ 01-05-2008, 06:57 PM: Message edited by: Bill Enos ]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-05-2008 06:17 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
booth employees change about every two weeks there, they discover quickly that McDonalds pays better and the charm of the archaic film gear wears off quickly on all but the biggest of AV CLub fans.

(plus, the fun factor wears off real quick as well when the work atmosphere and company operations expose themselves as actual grindhouse operations..worse than McD's and other 'choke and puke' burger joints could ever be..)

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-05-2008 11:35 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know about that, Have you ever WORKED at Micky Ds? I did a stint in collage at both a Taco Bell and a burger joint, (I forget which one, Carl's Jr. I think) and I think I woulda preferred a medieval toucher dungeon or 6 weeks at a combo insurance seminar/Jerry Falwell bible study camp to these chambers of horror! [Eek!] Mark, IF I'da seen that 500 buck Christie DLP, you'd had some competition in the bidding, just so I coulda had a high end DLP! Those are NO DOUBT far and few between but I WILL keep an eye open for them, what other DLPs are comperable to the Chistie?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-06-2008 03:09 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Beverly
Have you ever WORKED at Micky Ds?
(Nope, but did a month's stint at an "Arsenic Circle" (Arctic Circle) and thought that was a joke of an occupation..)

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-06-2008 01:17 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Beverly
I don't know about that, Have you ever WORKED at Micky Ds?
Definately not! Nor would I(feed that crap to the public!)... but the thing is that they PAY MORE than the majority of theaters around the Mountain States do. The Mikey D's in West Yellowstone, MT pays $15.00 an hour to start! Many in Wyoming also do because everyone there has either moved away or gone to work for Haliburton for 100 grand a year. Many FF places in Wyoming only have the drive throughs open due to lack of help.

Monte.... "Aresnic Circle" I gotta remember that one.... [Big Grin] Indeed they are!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-06-2008 05:05 PM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
It costs about 80 grand or more a year for salary and all the other taxes and BS associated with having 4 booth idiots (similar to the one mentioned in Tim's post) attempting to run your 6 to 8 screen theater. So eliminate them along with the stupid extra costs like in Tim's post above. With the simple addition of a Show Library the manager and assistant managers can easily handle the operation of an all digital cinema say up to the 8 screen level without alot of hassle
A problem with the math - a significant number of 6-8 screen buildings are already run by managers, in these the only "benefit" is the manager will end up paying even less attention to the presenation than they do now because they will not have to go into the booth to start the shows. (Please note that I know that everyone here cares, but there are many out there that either don't care or don't know any better)

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Contrary to what some people arouund here think the daily operating expense of a DLP booth can be EXACTLY THE SAME as an equivelent film booth.... possibly slightly less
Costs are pretty much a wash if you keep a staff running the booh - we saved a lot of payroll at our 18 screens where we used to have 2 booth operators per busy shift, now we never run more than 1 . . . . . our 10 screen only saw moderate savings . . . . . overall our savings would not come close to a 10 year payback of $80,000 each.

quote:
DLP projectors do not suffer from focus drift nor do they need the framing adjusted! In essence they can literally be run day in and day out unmanned!
I think there still needs to be someone looking at the presenation with a qualified eye to ensure every customer gets a good show - what if lights don't go down? what if there are amp or speaker problems? what if the focus does drift? what if the lamp starts to flicker? Who changes the lamp? What about weekly content ingestions and transfers - who double checks to make sure all content is ready to play? Who calls the distributor for KDMs if they don't arrive?

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
incompetant help
There in lies the issue - why are they accepting substandard help? If the job requires more skill then they should be paying a wage comensurate with the duties.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Also eliminating the booth mongers brings more of the service back to the dealer where it really belongs.

While I beleive most dealers definitely give excellent service, the service is reactionary - i.e. someone at the theatre has to notice there is an issue and call - not to mention a lot of minor issues will go unrepaired due to the desire to save money and wait for a tech's normal PM visit to have it fixed. I'd rather pay someone to be proactive in keeping every presentation as good as possible and call for service immediately when something needs the attention of someone more qualified.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-06-2008 05:42 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Zylstra
If the job requires more skill then they should be paying a wage comensurate with the duties.

..and this topic above has been slammed, beaten, swung, tormented, and ripped around in many topics in the "Ground level" forum... - which sounds that working in this theatre industry has really lost its "fun factor" in this generation.

Gee, let's get back on topic by following monthly or bi-annual procedures in keeping oil levels at their prime and needed oil changes for our dearly beloved Simplexes (and Cine V4's were noted as leakers as well) and other oil based, gear driven machines.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-06-2008 05:51 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Zylstra
There in lies the issue - why are they accepting substandard help? If the job requires more skill then they should be paying a wage comensurate with the duties.

Well, things out here are quite different from the much higher unemployed Michigan area which is at 7.7%(2007)... Out here you're lucky to get who you can... if you can. Unemployment in Utah is just 2.8% and Wyoming 2.9%(2007). Help is scarce to non-existant in some areas of Wyoming and good help is a once in a while occurance. You could offer to pay 15 or more bucks an hour and they're still goin to get paid way way more at Haliburton or by some other gas exploration firm. All in all its a very different scenerio here than areas with high unemployment where there are plentyful amounts of job seekers. Wyoming is probably the worst as far as getting any help at all.... in fact the younger generation if not working for the Haliburtons are moving away or going to school in other States. Its because of all this that Digital makes huge sense for several of our customers.

With the aid of a Show Library ingestion can be done leisurely any time you get a digital print in. Transfers can be scheduled to occur over night or in between shows... what ever is convenient. It takes half real time to transfer over the theater network to the appropriate screen, multi screen transfers are also possible but it slows things down. Also with the push by a number of distributers to get rid of USB drives and switch to hot pluggables the ingestion time will be drastically shortened. Ingestion is really the least of the problem in a 6 to 8 screener. One thing the theaters involved usually have is ample management so having the management cover ingestion and show buildup-scheduling is more of a doable than with film. The way Dolby integrates all their pieces into an entire ethernet based system allows this to happen much much more easily than a Doremi based system... and much much more reliably. As for lamp changes... we already do all the lamp changes for one of the larger chains... big deal and no hassle really... we get paid for doing it. In changing lamps the booth mongers would be exposing themselves to too much danger to attempt it and the liability factor is considerably greater. Lamps are reliable these days... I can't remember when I had a new Christie lamp fail within warranty.... its been probably 10 or more years. Ushio makes OSRAM's short gap lamps too so the reliability is going to be the same. If a manager has to change a lamp at least the Lamp Loc feature on the Christies automatically tweeks the lamp to proper X-Y-Z positions in less than 4 min. Again, with digital... at least Christies stuff there is a better chance for getting the lamp in and adjusted correctly than in a film system that requires human interface.

I agree that having people monitoring IN the booth is a good thing but in many instances those in the booths cause more damage then they do good. I can't tell you how many of Tim's instances I tend to... Management could also do daily checks of the projectors... Its easy enough to throw an RP-40 clip on screen and check focus... and if they don't there IS LESS CHANCE of focus drift then with any film based system... I wonder what the Nationwide percentage of film based systems actually have the focus ever looked at during a show... I'm sure the percentage is very low. At any rate these and many other reasons makes digital much more favorable for several of our customers.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.