|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What's up with prints from India??
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Frodsham
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 238
From: Stoke on Trent, Staffs, UK
Registered: Nov 2006
|
posted 07-14-2008 12:26 AM
Yes, here in the UK most of our prints arrive on cores anyway. It is very rare for us to receive a print on spools.
Most of the Bollywood films we have screened are almost brand new, on cores and with leaders and tails. One of their prints recently arrived without leaders or tails (and this is where you put yourself at the mercy of the previous projectionist) so you keep your fingers crosed that they are in the correct cans! The prints are usually in very good condition and almost always come complete with DTS soundtrack discs.
As has been mentioned earlier, most of the parts are doubled-up, so you have parts 1+2 in one can, parts 3+4 in the next etc. Confusingly, the DTS unit will often refer to part 1+2 as reel 1 and parts 3+4 as reel 2!! After a while, you get the hang of it!
On screen, the prints look great apart from 'flashing' on the top and bottom frameline as each of the orignal negative cuts pass through. The sound quality is usually stunning and overall I find the films quite exciting - they are very pacy (visually and audibly)!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-14-2008 01:14 AM
Joe, best thing to do in the face of super cheap owners when they won't buy you something you need to run a show -- like a split reel -- simply say, "Hey man, sorry, this print won't run because it has no reels or hubs and you freaks won't buy the specialized equipment necessary to run it. Now split reel, no show." That's the way I got my SR cards in one booth. One day I just said, "Sorry, we can't run that print because it's got the new SR soundtrack and we don't have the SR cards necessary to play it." We got cards that week. Especially now that dumbass owners have experienced the "cyan crisis," they are familiar with the concept of: "if you don't have this piece of equipment, you can't play that piece of film." If they won't buy you cores, you don't play their coreless prints.
Besides, why can't you wind onto trailer cores? You must have like a trillion of those lying around, no? Don't you have a trailer core keyed thing-a-ma-bob? One of those brass slugs the size of the trailer core with a hole and key in the middle that fits on the rewind spindle and another slot on the outer diameter that the key in the trailer core slides onto? If not, it would be a good thing to either have one machined, or make one out of wood like I've seen. It's just a wooden dowel with a center hole drilled and keyed and the outer diameter keyed as well.
When prints come without a core, I just put the reel on the split reel flange that has the center spindle. The spindle is always smaller than the donut hole in the film, then pack tissue paper into the space between the film hole and the flange spindle -- however much it takes to really pack it tightly. Then just lock on the other flange and bingo -- works like a champ every time. Just rewind a little slower than usual as you get close to the center.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 07-14-2008 01:15 AM
On the stunning print quality issue, I remember an anecdote John Pytlak told me at the AMIA conference in '03 or '04. He'd been contacted by a Bollywood DoP who was looking to carry out restoration work on a feature he'd shot back in the '70s. Apparently the standard practice in Indian labs was (and even by the early '00s, still was) to strike all release prints by continuous contacting printing the cut camera negative - no f/g interpos and then dupe neg generations were made at all!
The problem was that this film became so popular that after about 300 prints were made, the cut camera negative was wearing out. So they patched it up, Scotchgarded it and made another few hundred prints. 30 years later, they were getting very poor quality when attempting to print a fine grain preservation master from this negative, because the Scotchgard coating was distorting the image on the dupe. Because Scotchgard is a completely irreversible process, there was nothing which could be done at the time. 5 years later or so I suspect that a 4k scan and then a digital intermediate cleanup would be his best bet. But if the Bollywood prints we're seeing are second generation compared to fourth for most American and European prints, that would certainly explain why they look so great! Effectively, they're all showprints.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Higgins
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Norcross, GA, USA
Registered: Jun 2008
|
posted 07-18-2008 04:12 PM
To break them down, if they have core, I have a half reel I put it on and then dump it out into the can. If they don't have cores, I use one of the black plastic cores that trailers and commercials come on and do the same thing.
The reason they come in the film cans is money, if you peel the label the film company has stuck onto the reel can you will see that it is the Kodak can the blank film came to them in. I'm thinking the same for the boxes probably.
Plus they are not always musicals, I can tell you this because we always have at least 1 Bollywood movie at all times.
I can tell you from first hand experience that the way most movies from India are played in America is some private individual (not necessarily part of any film company or theater) will purchase the movie from the Indian film company and then this person will rent theater and show the film. Some times they are waiting just outside your door when the film ends wanting to know how quickly you can break it down so they can run it to the next theater they have rented in the next town. Sometimes they could care less and abandon the film. Like I said in a different post, I have at leat 100 if not more abandon Indian films in my storage space and back hallway.
So the reason that most come with their heads and tails cut is the projectionist prior to you didn't feel like reattaching them . Why they have no cores, that beats me, sometimes they do, sometimes they don't, perhaps there core hoarders out there stealing them.
Also, I have on occasion put a commercial inside the core space and built and broken down on to them and then popped them out and into the film can.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Geena Phillips
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 198
From: Norcross, GA / USA
Registered: Apr 2006
|
posted 07-19-2008 12:48 AM
I handle 1-3 Indian prints a week, in addition to my normal Hollywood stuff. The ones in Hindi are now handled through traditional booking methods, and are generally uniform in quality: 3" cores for each reel, all in individual cans inside a burlap-covered box (usually two per print). Those are no big deal; a split reel and you're good to go.
It's the rentals (usually in Telegu or Tamil and sometimes Kannada) that are often problematic; those prints are generally very handled, and quite poorly so, by the time they reach us. They are generally without cores, and often lack heads or tails (or, when they have them, some asshat has elected not to attach them to the reel). There will be innumerable repair splices, almost always done with something OTHER than clear splicing tape. I try to return those prints in better shape than I got them in, but time is very frequently a factor; the "print-slingers" (as my erstwhile boss calls them) who rent the theatres for their films are usually anxious to move on to the next town, a la Bill Bixby.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|