|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Bad Rectifryer???
|
|
|
Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 01-17-2009 01:30 AM
quote: Richard Hamilton As far as anyone badmouthing these "Chinese Crap" projectors, if you haven't seen them or worked with them, that's bullshit. The image is rock steady with more than enough light. The only real issue was the platter timing, which the factory sent technicians to the States to fix. When I worked for Ballantyne, all I did was travel around fixing Apogees in fairly new installs, more problems than these Horizons have had.
Richard, try not to take my comments personally.
I am speaking from over 26 years of experience in cinema service and projection operations. I was responsible for a service territory with over 1,400 screens and too many other cinemas to count since then.
The biggest headaches and most trouble-prone equipment was all that made in either China or India. I will honestly say that I have not had any hands-on with Horizon equipment or the platters/rectifiers at Andrew's theatre. I am speaking from the experience with older equipment.
The simple mathematical ratio of breakdowns per screen/complex for those two countries of origin was over three times more often than the cinemas using Century, Cinemeccanica, Norelco/Kinoton, Simplex and Christie. I had files of all my service reports that backed that up.
A rock steady image and bright illumination is great, but if the damn equipment can't keep running then where's the value? The excessive issues and downed screen time is really going to kill that theatre's reputation, and in today's climate every lost customer is a big deal.
Andrew has reported a LOT more issues than just platter timing on this forum.
As for Apogee, c'mon. That IS junk from Ballenswine and there's no comparison there. And I am not trying to proclaim that American manufacturers have never made crap equipment. (Anyone remember the Dreamcatcher? Or anything from CFS/Rentec?)
But the simple fact is, from what Andrew has been posting here, is that for equipment that is not that old he's had a HUGE amount of issues and downtime that is simply unacceptable.
Finally, I find it very difficult to believe that the rectifier is UL listed. The exposed, "binding post" type of AC input terminals would not get past UL in most cases. (Note that most local Code enforcement officials will NOT accept equipment that is not UL listed. There are a few other agency listings that would be accepted with documentation.)
If it is listed then a picture of the UL label or the UL file number will prove me wrong, and I'll have a nice crow pie standing by.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|