Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Would you trade a new Horizon 5565 for a Used Century Projector/Christy Platter? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Would you trade a new Horizon 5565 for a Used Century Projector/Christy Platter?
Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-02-2009 04:00 PM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ian Parfrey
This isn't a dump on Chinese equipment but it is built to a price-period. You pays your money, you gets your dues.
Sure it is. I can't remember EVER seeing anything come from China in my lifetime that had any decent amount of quality to it. They make cheap products for cheap prices for a throw away society.

Everyone wants cheaper products and higher wages so companies are forced to have things made overseas with cheap labor and cheap materials. There is no reason people should be making over twenty dollars an hour at auto factories in the US pushing a button then sitting down to read the paper for the rest of their shift. I have been in enough of them to see it first hand and known plenty of people that do it. Then everyone is wondering why cars cost $30-$40,000 but are still junk.

Everyone bags on Wal-Mart for supporting the Chinese market and not letting labor unions in. Why do people keep shopping there then? If people wouldn't buy there then Wal-Mart would be forced to do something else. The fact of the matter is everyone wants to buy at cheap prices but get paid the big bucks when they go to work and not do anything for their pay.

The company I work for even has a small factory over there that makes some of our consumables. It is a very heavy product yet we can make it over there, ship it here and still undercut any domestic manufacturer's price by a decent margin. I don't like it but unfortunately this is how you have to survive in today's business world. The rest of our products are manufactured in Toronto and we cannot compete with all of the foreign knock-offs that have come on the scene in the last five years. I used to see customers that cared about quality and sometimes I still do, but once the requisition hits the purchasing agent's desk, the penny pinchers have the last say and they usually buy cheap foreign crap. The best part is after about a year or so they sometimes end up buying ours anyways because of all the downtime they experience with the cheap stuff.

The president of our company spends a lot of time overseas and some of it in China. One of our engineers is also Chinese and I have gotten to talk with both of them at length about the corruption of the Chinese political system and their business practices. If the stories that I have heard are true, they will do just about anything to make a buck even if it's unethical.

Get your money back on that foreign Horizon crap and buy something better for cheaper. Even a rebuilt Century would be light years ahead of that junk and would cost half as much.

Keep your eye out and check out ebay. There is a ton of stuff coming out of the theaters in the past year from people switching to digital. I have bought a lot of stuff from large chains that have switched over and are selling off all of their film equipment. Just look at all of the Dolby CP-500 units on ebay in the last three weeks. Previous to that they were few and far between. Now they are a dime a dozen but are still fetching a good price. Six months from now they will have lost their value because they are flooding the market. I have seen equipment on ebay go from the thousands one month, to hundreds the next. DTS units used to fetch $2,500 or more a year or two ago but you can't get $750 for one on ebay now even if it has the reader with it.

[ 03-02-2009, 07:44 PM: Message edited by: Joshua Waaland ]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2009 08:46 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
with 3D specified at 3-5fL...
The reason 3-5 is the spec is because thats the realistic amount of light one could get out of the scaled down set of DLP chips according to DCI without running the lamps all the time at maximum power. Now with new full frame DLP able to be factored in it'll bring the brightness up a bit. Use of the proper projector is also an advantage. Although those right angled lamphouses may afford some protection to the Dolby Wheel that extra mirror does have an effect on light level. Many of those are hot mirrors and so as they fade the light level declines gradually while the CLO sensor tries to make up for it... eventually it can't.

quote: Steve Guttag
Welcome to Mark's opinions...not the movie maker's. If the studios wanted more light, all they had to do was specify it.
Eh, Wrong! Not my opinion. Its DCIP's opinion. Perhaps you should think about attending the DCIP meeting in Burbank comming up that will allow you to see 3-D run at all different light levels timed for it and not. IN fact a fellow that did all the spec work highly reccomended to me that I run things at 7fl. It works just fine and looks far better and results in far less eye strain than a 5fl Dolby 3-D system. Colors are well maintained up to about 7.5 fl.

One thing is very clear and that is that 3-5 fl is way too dim for an enjoyable watch... I'm at a site with Dolby 3-D that is at about 4.8 fl and I wouldn't want to watch a show there. So yes, I'll continue to vie for Silver screens and Master Image. At least the eye strain is minimized, the image is watchable and the filter wheel doesn't cost as much as a down payment on a new summer cabin.

I agree but not 100% on the image warping thing. If the chips were larger say around 3K so we had pixels to waste then it would be fine. Otherwise image warping is going to get you more or less the exact same pixel loss as using the masking. Or if you warp on the 2K chips you'd have to scale things down while you warp so you wouldn't loose the sides, then you loose resolution. Either way its loose loose.

Only time will tell on your lamps... that hasn't been my experience with the 6k's though nor has the local chain running about 50 projectors seen that sort of consistancy(out of any brand lamp).

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-04-2009 05:10 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Eh, Wrong! Not my opinion. Its DCIP's opinion. Perhaps you should think about attending the DCIP meeting in Burbank comming up that will allow you to see 3-D run at all different light levels timed for it and not.
Cool...do you have any of that in writing in the form of a specification from a distributor? I've seen the documentation that does not specify light levels that high for as recent a movie as Coraline...their max was 5.5fL.

The realities are...if a movie is timed for 4.5fL than running at 7fL CAN'T look better in terms of highs to lows because there won't be any lows...the black levels come up with the whites..thems the facts and you can't get around it. Then again, you are working with Silver screens so you have 7fL in the center and only 3.5fL once you are a mere 20-degrees off center...perhaps that is why you don't see the black leve issue. Then again, color satuation again zooms up when you nearly double the output...at one point on the screen. No matter how you dance around it, the image is wrong.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
One thing is very clear and that is that 3-5 fl is way too dim for an enjoyable watch
Agreed. 3D does make the image suffer in that respect. Everything has a bit of an overcast look to it. There is a reason that 14fL is the white level on 2D digital. At least on Dolby, with a proper screen, it is 3-5fL everywhere...not 1-5 on a typical silver screen installation or 1.5-7fL in your installations.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I agree but not 100% on the image warping thing. If the chips were larger say around 3K so we had pixels to waste then it would be fine. Otherwise image warping is going to get you more or less the exact same pixel loss as using the masking.
This is true...however, the loss is in the resolution, not in the critical information. That is, subtitles or other valuable image is kept on the screen or prevented from appearing skewed, warped, slanted....etc. A reasonable trade off. If there were 3K chips, so much the better. And if they had 4K chips, they would approach film's resolution...for the worst 35mm release format.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-04-2009 05:59 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
Cool...do you have any of that in writing in the form of a specification from a distributor? I've seen the documentation that does not specify light levels that high for as recent a movie as Coraline...their max was 5.5fL.

Nope, but the reccomendation is straight from the DCI guys. I highly reccomend that you attend that meeting... I believe it's next week though.

Its true when you crank the light level up that the black to white raises a bit but then put the glasses on and its just about back to normal. This is just gobs easier on the eyes and much more enjoyable to watch than a 5fl show is. Specs are very definately not always a good thing in and of themselves and sometimes bending them a bit is very advantageous.

quote: Steve Guttag
And if they had 4K chips, they would approach film's resolution...for the worst 35mm release format.

I beg to differ on the release print aspect of the whole thing. At best a very good release print these days can make if you're lucky 2K comparable resolution... many are even worse than that! A really good wet gate print done on a step printer might make 4K if everything in the lab is exact. Quality Lab work is fast becomming a lost art and it painfully shows in todays release prints. One of the worst looking release prints of lately was the last Pink Panther installment. It looked like it was either lensed with a Bolex 16mm or shot with a prosumer video camera. It was film garbage at it's finest example! To me the 2K system makes far more sense than touch and go release prints like that and at least 2K is consistant in sharpness and color. If the labs can clean up their act then I'm all for putting D-Cinema to sleep permanently... but that'll never happen.

P.S. if you were to do any kind of image warpping on 4K then you'd need about a 6K imaging system to be able to maintain that 4K rez!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-04-2009 06:46 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I beg to differ on the release print aspect of the whole thing. At best a very good release print these days can make if you're lucky 2K comparable resolution
I just love it when you beg...or is that Phil?

No argument that release prints vary all over the place. An EK print will pretty easily hit 4K resolution on 1.85...a release print...maybe...but nowhere near 2K unless the print is plumb defective.

Now move over to Scope...oops...with film, more resolution, with digital less resolution.

And we are not even into color, contrast...etc.

I'm not for putting DCinema to rest for even if labs were perfect, I would hope DCinema could some day surpass film...I've always been about putting the best show out. Then I hope that they stop shooting in Super-2.39...it looks awful. To my way of thinking...shoot in 5/65 regardless of release format...start with the best image possible.

Steve

PS Horizon (had to put this thread back on topic [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Bangs
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Kerrville, Texas, United States
Registered: Sep 2008


 - posted 03-04-2009 10:38 PM      Profile for Andrew Bangs   Author's Homepage   Email Andrew Bangs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
PS Horizon (had to put this thread back on topic
Right...

 |  IP: Logged

Benjamin Speed
Film Handler

Posts: 6
From: Franklin, Maine, U.S.A.
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 03-05-2009 08:27 AM      Profile for Benjamin Speed   Author's Homepage   Email Benjamin Speed   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello,

Thanks to everyone for their comments and support. Before we pursue a refund for the machine, we are gathering more information from the dealer to see if the swap is worth our while. Here are some answers they supplied for our questions:

1) Would there be any cost to us for this swap? No.

2) Is any of the equipment rebuilt, or is it all just used? Used.

3) What year was this projector manufactured? ?

4) Do you know how many hours the projector has on it? How many? Unknown

5) Can you tell me what kind of theater this came from? Multiplex, art house, 2 screen? Unknown

6) What kind of lamp house and rectifier would come with this projector? Orcon 2k

7) Does this Century have an R3 sound head? ?

8) Will the lenses and bulbs we currently have fit this Century projector? Yes

9) How old is the AW-3 platter? Does it have removable brains? Get S/N? Brains. The platters are probably 10-12 years old. We had 70 of them with removable brains but sold them all recently; the only ones left do not have removable brains.

10) In my research of rebuilt Centuries I’ve found the price to be below what was paid for the new 5565. Would you be able to include a make-up table and or possibly include some hours of service or even better some kind of warranty to make up the difference? We sell new Horizon systems for about the same price as used domestic systems.

11) Can you send me the dimensions of this equipment? One concern is space and we just want to make sure it will fit. ? Our technician says it's tight but will fit.

12) What kind of time frame would be involved if this swap were to move forward? How long from when we make a decision would it take to complete the swap and installation? Obviously scheduling for all parties would need to be consider, mainly our technicians and yours. Equip available now; Our technician to coordinate schedule.

13) Finally, just so we can give our superiors complete information, what is your return policy? And why would we not be able to get a full refund and return the equipment? Horizon return policy published on-line at www.horizonprojection.com. I've never seen a projector company with a refund policy; we exchange or refund unused lenses with a re-stocking charge.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2009 09:20 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Benjamin Speed
Is any of the equipment rebuilt, or is it all just used? Used.

Didn't you purchase a NEW PROJECTOR?????

quote: Benjamin Speed
6) What kind of lamp house and rectifier would come with this projector? Orcon 2k

Almost no parts are available for ORCON with the exception of the reflector which you can get from Optifirm. This is a bad deal!

quote: Benjamin Speed
9) How old is the AW-3 platter? Does it have removable brains? Get S/N? Brains. The platters are probably 10-12 years old. We had 70 of them with removable brains but sold them all recently; the only ones left do not have removable brains.

Again... Not a good deal! This is perhaps a 500 buck platter at best. Its also between 15 and 20 years old minimum. The motors will probably need to be overhauled.

As a dealer WE WOULD GiVE YOU A FULL REFUND if you were unhappy would substantiate why. This has never happened to us however we have swapped out to different equipment on a couple of occasions where the customer was uncomfortable with the initial equipment.

You're basically getting a pile of pulled as-is equipment that is fairly old, some is obsolete with basically no parts availability. I'm dating this gear to be around 20+ years by the non-removable AW-3 brains and ORCON Lamphouse.

It may actually be time to consult an applicable attorney!!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2009 10:13 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think there would be little legal action possible since their policy is fairly clear on their site and I would assume the purchase contract may also contain similar wording.
Local state laws may be different but I doubt that you would have much luck internationally

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-05-2009 10:44 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark and I actually agree on this one (regarding the potential "deal").

I quickly scanned over their warranty...other than "striving" for 100% satisfaction...where does it say they will take anything back? They say, within a year of purchase they will exchange parts, as-needed.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2009 11:30 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And it looks like from their Policies page, there is no guaranteed return.

I see a nasty fight on your hands.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2009 12:19 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't there an implied warranty, though, if the dealer picks the equipment?

If I go to a dealer and tell him that I want to do X and he sells me equipment that he claims will do X, don't I have some recourse if the equipment demonstrably fails to serve the purpose for which it was sold? Isn't the customer paying for the dealer's knowledge of the product and his assurance that it will function as intended?

Now, this does not mean that I can go to a dealer with a "shopping list" of mismatched or junk equipment and then complain that the equipment was poorly specified. That would be entirely my fault. But if the customer asks the dealer to sell him something that will serve his needs and the equipment that he is sold does not do this, then I would hope that a reputable dealer would make good on the deal with either a refund or a mutually agreeable replacement of defective equipment.

Since we don't know what the original poster asked the dealer to provide, it's hard to know if he should feel entitled to a refund.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 03-05-2009 12:59 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Benjamin Speed
1) Would there be any cost to us for this swap? No.

2) Is any of the equipment rebuilt, or is it all just used? Used.

3) What year was this projector manufactured? ?

4) Do you know how many hours the projector has on it? How many? Unknown

5) Can you tell me what kind of theater this came from? Multiplex, art house, 2 screen? Unknown

6) What kind of lamp house and rectifier would come with this projector? Orcon 2k

7) Does this Century have an R3 sound head? ?

8) Will the lenses and bulbs we currently have fit this Century projector? Yes

9) How old is the AW-3 platter? Does it have removable brains? Get S/N? Brains. The platters are probably 10-12 years old. We had 70 of them with removable brains but sold them all recently; the only ones left do not have removable brains.

10) In my research of rebuilt Centuries I’ve found the price to be below what was paid for the new 5565. Would you be able to include a make-up table and or possibly include some hours of service or even better some kind of warranty to make up the difference? We sell new Horizon systems for about the same price as used domestic systems.

11) Can you send me the dimensions of this equipment? One concern is space and we just want to make sure it will fit. ? Our technician says it's tight but will fit.

12) What kind of time frame would be involved if this swap were to move forward? How long from when we make a decision would it take to complete the swap and installation? Obviously scheduling for all parties would need to be consider, mainly our technicians and yours. Equip available now; Our technician to coordinate schedule.

13) Finally, just so we can give our superiors complete information, what is your return policy? And why would we not be able to get a full refund and return the equipment? Horizon return policy published on-line at www.horizonprojection.com. I've never seen a projector company with a refund policy; we exchange or refund unused lenses with a re-stocking charge.


Benjamin, get an attorney RIGHT NOW and sue that asshole dealer!! And be sure to post their name on the "Deadbeats In the Industry" thread!!

My answers to their answers:

1: Damn right there better not be any charge.
2: Ripoff again, used equip. can be had for a LOT less than the $13k you paid; it's possible to get a Christie package NEW for that price;
3: They are dumbasses. A search with the serial numbers can get that info;
4: That is difficult to answer as it may have been around in several different booths..the first honest thing those jackalopes have said so far;
5:Bullshit, they should be able to tell you the last known location of that equipment..unless they stole it or otherwise bought it under shady means. It sounds like they're trying to give you back your old equipment.
6: See Brad's post above, ORC is JUNK!! And as Mark pointed out, it's parts are NLA. (No Longer Available)
7: Total dumbasses if they can't even tell what kind of soundhead it is. Sheesh.
8: Big whoop. The lenses are important and of course they'll fit virtually ANY projector out there. As for the bulbs, if they sold you the cheap Chink bulbs with the projectors, throw them out and get Christies.
9: An AW3 without removable brains is worth about $200 at most. It will need motors rebuilt as Mark has said and probably updated control cards. Total ripoff. I can get AW3's with removable payouts for around $500-800max.
10:We sell new Horizon systems for about the same price as used domestic systems. Who the fuck are these people!!! Even more proof that they're ripoff artists!! And after the royal [sex] you have already had at their hands, I sure as hell wouldn't trust them to service ANY of my equipment..I wouldn't let them unstop a toilet!!
11: Not an issue really. A projector on base like Simplex LL# or Century's equivalent and a compact lamphouse will take up less space that the Horizon junk.
12: A competent tech can do it in less than a single day..any longer than that and they don't know what they're doing.
13: Fuck their policy. They sold you unserviceable crap and you are entitled to a FULL refund, and if your state law permits it, you can sue for loss of income and other damages.

It's a good thing I don't live there, as I would be at that "dealer" and raising all kinds of hell...

Do us ALL a big favor and TELL US WHO IT IS!!

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2009 02:18 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It looks like from their web sites that all transactions are actually done offshore so any legal recourse would probably be useless.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 03-05-2009 03:41 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
It looks like from their web sites that all transactions are actually done offshore so any legal recourse would probably be useless.
Gordon, it doesn't matter where the equipment came from, if the DEALER is based here in the U.S., they will be subject to all laws including that of mercantibility and all other implied warranties.

And if they aren't licensed to practice business in that state or here in the US they are in HUGE trouble.

That dealer's best option is to give a full refund, take back that equipment and disappear before the whole thing caves in on them.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.