Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Recommend me a dimmer (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Recommend me a dimmer
Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-25-2009 07:39 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
actually we have very stable hydro
those motors just suck

 |  IP: Logged

John Eickhof
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 588
From: Wendell, ID USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-25-2009 08:52 PM      Profile for John Eickhof   Author's Homepage   Email John Eickhof   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Speaking of dimmers...anyone have wiring diagrams for the Hunt Electronics 3kw dimmer pack, it has three modules, the ID-30 dimmer module, MCIF/SPA control module and the AIFC-1/IFC-1 remote module...I have a couple setups and want to experimant with them, they were made in the late 1970s and they are quite robust with a very large torroid and SCR! As for the post...I recommend the Kelmar dimmer also, Thanks! John

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-25-2009 09:28 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, it all depends on the situation. If Honda only had a market of say 5000 people for their car, then there is no way they could make it for $38,000 (nor could anyone else).

Ask anyone that has had to go through UL (or ETL) listing what it costs just for that...now spread that out over your potential sales. Ever priced out steel? It isn't cheap stuff, let alone bent up and painted steel.

Unfortunately, slave labor, no overhead (environmental or otherwise) and high volume has skewed your belief in what things are really worth.

I have no idea if Kelmar is going out of business but I highly doubt they have ever been living wealthy. They make good products for fair prices. And yes, when the market is small, you are going to pay that much more for it. That is true in any industry. But hey, you think it doesn't cost that much to make it...open Joe's rewinder's see if you can live off of you rewinders were everything is under a grand. BTW...the LIST price for a single motor table top is $318.00...so change out your sagging table if it pisses you off so...or make your own. So, what is the cost/year on a rewinder? $100/year? Big deal.

Steve

[ 03-26-2009, 08:01 AM: Message edited by: Steve Guttag ]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 12:09 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, if you've read my posts you'd know that I don't have a Kelmar table.

So I can finance one and pay $100 a year? I know what you are saying, but the cost/year thing doesn't do a whole lot for me unless something requires maintenance. Like the cost/year of owning a Strong projector would be xx amount of dollars due to changing oil, gate bands, etc. A cost per year for something bought outright which rarely needs anything replaced or fixed is like saying the cost per year for a nail is .000000000000001 cents.

And I never said Kelmar was "living wealthy" or are scam artists or anything else you will try to imply from my comments. You seem to think that I did because of the AIG comment as well. My comment only said "it seems" like they are overpriced. So much defensive anger in you, Steve. You don't happen to be associated with a Kelmar dealer, do you?

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 03-26-2009 12:23 AM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We've been using the dual motor table for 20 years now and no sagging problems. All original parts except the auto-shut off arm. It was either never installed or ordered. It was only just last summer that I installed it. I will be modifying it to install a counter top light for examining film when building up prints. I'll probably go ahead and replace or just lay down a new piece Formica while I'm at it.

We had one film cleaner until recently. I have since bought 4 more off ebay for really cheap. I have also found that the windshield washer hose that Autozone sells buy the foot is really good for replacing the rubber inserts on the rewind side of the cleaner. It fits snug on the shaft and isn't too big in the uncompressed state, so its real easy to slide the cores (film-tech or cardboard) off for changing. Just had to cut them a little longer so that when compressed they engage the core firmly. I can't remember the part# right now, but I'm sure Mike Blakesley can get it before I do.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-26-2009 08:13 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, your nail example is why nobody really cares about the price of nails except contractors that buy them by the ton. They are effectively free from a owner's standpoint.

Most theatres do pay a bank and the cost of things, like rewinders are factored into that payment. Everything in a business should figure in its return on the investment. Some things are easy, some things are hard (say painting the walls in an office...how much more money does that generate).

I'm not angry at all with you but I do see an unrealistic skewing of perception when one thinks in terms of what China can do en mass versus what one has to do for a tiny market like cinema. When you are making very few things, the cost of each has to be higher to pay for not only the materials and the people to make it, but all of the design work that went into it, the overhead (shop, certifications...etc) and such.

BTW...Kelmar is by far not the most expensive rewinder out there nor are most of their products...they are typically in the middle of the road, price wise, with some a bit more, some a bit less. The fact that you noted that nobody seemed to be able to make a rewinder for under a grand should tell you that perhaps there is more to it in the big picture. Perhaps a Wolk rewinder with the washing machine motor hanging off a table you supply could be made that cheap...however, from a liability standpoint...the exposed belt plus the knob that will tear up your chest if you come near it while on would scare most companies away (as it should).

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 10:36 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok, So far here are the scores....

Steve:4

Mark:3

Gord:2

Monte:1

Joe:0

Or this translates into:

Kelmar Dimmers: 10

Stan Ash Dimmers: 4 (they woulda been a 5 but they left the dam manual buttons off!)

Lindsey Fairbanks: 3

Lehigh: 3

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 01:08 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually manual buttons are a option if you request it

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 03:17 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, you just described my Neumade PRT Ultra table to a T with your washing machine/exposed belt reference.

Mark, STFU.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-26-2009 08:07 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Neumade does cover the belt on the PRT...it is just that most take the belt guards off.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 08:28 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting. I've never seen one with it covered. Got any pics lying around?

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-26-2009 10:20 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know how to create a link to the page Joe, but look up your own topic, "How do I get my long shaft out of this hole?"

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-26-2009 10:45 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe's long shaft

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-27-2009 01:02 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
Actually manual buttons are a option if you request it



Manual override buttons shold NEVER be an option on any dimmer!!

quote: Gordon McLeod
actually we have very stable hydro

I know darn well that Keith wold argue with you on that statement!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.