Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » No Tape - Take Down Question (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: No Tape - Take Down Question
Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-18-2009 12:14 PM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with all the above statements of, Brad, John, Joe, Matt and Monte.

Most questions like this should not even need to be asked if Projectionist's were taught correctly in the first place.

But do understand these days far too many 'floor' people getting a foot into the projection room/Booth/Bio-Box without enough training, then handing down lack of knowledge to the next usher!

JOHN: When and if you read this, I have been forced to retire due health (cancer), do you know the guy I need to contact regarding 'Cinema Pioneers' program?
Ron Hart gave me a Name and email address a year ago but I lost it. All the google searches I do come up with basically useless results.

PM me here or try the email button thing here, hopefully the update I just did worked. (Took me a week to find my password to get in here!)

Email me so I can add you to my address book and we should catch up, before... well we should catch up!

B!

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-18-2009 12:43 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's my take on all this tape bullshit. I work second run and I've NEVER received a used print that had the end of the film stuck in the slot of a core based shipping reel, always taped. This is from studio classics divisions too.

The myth of paper tape not leaving residue is just that, a myth. I've found it to leave just as much goo as masking tape after it has been in place for an extended period and it releases on its own nearly as quickly too. In any case a little Film Guard removes whatever is there. The only real residue difference is masking tape adhesive eventually dries out and is extremely difficult to remove where in the same time frame paper tape looses enough adhesion to release but the adhesive is still soft and can be removed with some effort.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 06-18-2009 12:49 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dang, then we should abolish the use of masking tape and convert in the use of the white Artist's Tape.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-18-2009 02:56 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only thing resembling residue from the artists tape that I use is a bit of "scum" around the area of the tape edges after I peel it off, but it wasn't deposited by the tape itself. It's just that underneath the tape looks bare and the rest of the film has been treated with Filmguard, etc. I only use the tape for labeling prints as well as labeling the head leader. I do NOT use a piece of tape to stick the hanging tail leader to the reel flange or worse... the core of film itself. I hate it when people do that.

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Bailey
Master Film Handler

Posts: 461
From: Port Arthur,TX
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 06-18-2009 03:25 PM      Profile for Matthew Bailey   Email Matthew Bailey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Securing the film around the outside of the shipping reel with a large size rubber band? I use smaller size rubber bands to secure the film when storing trailers in my trailer collection.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-18-2009 05:08 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bill Langfield
I agree with all the above statements of, Brad, John, Joe, Matt and Monte.
HOLY SHIT! IT'S BILL! [Eek!]

I'll send you an email.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 06-18-2009 05:56 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have actually had more problems related to gum left on the film by artists tape than by masking tape. When the artists tape gets warm, there is a tenancy for the adheasive to separate from the base. Of the three projection rooms I've worked in, two of them would get pretty hot in the summer time.

When it comes to masking tape, I have found some tape is horrible at leaving adheasive on the film and others leave nothing. The tape I use is a 1" Ace Hardware brand masking tape.

I know others have had different experiences, but this is based on my experiences.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-18-2009 06:40 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill

Your email bounced back..send one to me at Galaxy (click 'mail' above)

John

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-18-2009 07:10 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You people who aggravate over what kind of tape is used to temporarily secure a previously detached head or tail a worrying about the insignificant, I'm happy as hell when all the heads/tails are present whether attached or not, when they are attached by any means (staples, masking tape, paper tape, or any thing else to the correct reel) I consider it a near miracle.

Somebody tell what difference it makes how the end of the film is secured to a core. Cite an authoritative source. Anybody who runs the end of the reel thru will cut that heavily creased/folded end off so they can insert it into the slot of a reel.

Sorry guys but film is a disposable, cheap and plentiful media. Take enough care of it to get your use and it is soon back to you as beverage containers, plastic wrap.....

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Althaus
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: Bedford, TX
Registered: Dec 2008


 - posted 06-18-2009 08:34 PM      Profile for Jonathan Althaus   Email Jonathan Althaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Justin

The problem with the 1" tape is I find it a little too wide. When I get used prints with the 1", I find the tape to make more of a mess than a thinner size. I prefer the 0.7" Scotch brand masking tape, although it is a little more difficult to find.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 06-18-2009 10:25 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I think I mentioned once in another post long ago-
when I started working as a union projectionist putting
tape of ANY kind (even splicing tape) on film was frowned
upon. Reels ends were secured with "reel bands".

Unfortunately you very rarely see them today, and most
booth people don't know how to use them anyway.

(Some of them TAPE the of the band to the film which
totally ruins it [Mad] )

And while we're talking about taping down film, beleive
it or not, there is a right and a wrong way to do this.

I learned this from the old projectionist who taught
me this craft. Since then I've spent a lot of time in projection
rooms and also a short time as an editor handling many,
many little rolls of film,and these two simple "tricks" can
make doing both tasks a little easier & save a little time.

Here's a demo I've made from an old trailer.
I spliced a little camera negative stock on the
begining for contrast so that it's easier to see.

In this example, the film is wound counter-clockwise.
The light colored film is the "body" of the roll.
The dark film with the tapered end is the "end" of the roll.

 -

What's so great about this?
If tape is applied this way, it can be removed in one pull ,
and using only one hand.

If the "X" was facing the other way, it requires
two seperate pulls and two hands to remove the tape.

You have no idea how much easier this is! If you don't
beleive me, get yourself a roll of film & some tape and
try doing it both ways.

Another advantage is that the little tab makes finding
which end to pull easier, and since the tape will also
ususally come off in one piece, it can be re-used again
to re-tape the film end down when you're through.

(The tapered cut film end is for illustrative purposes only)

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-18-2009 11:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
What Jim just posted above is a HUGE pet peeve of mine. I am in full agreement with him that the above is how films should be taped.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 06-18-2009 11:39 PM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know this will irritate a few people but....

My secret to attaching masking tape to film is to have it on the old splice tape, and not over lapping onto the film. This way the next chap (or myself) can remove any residue from the masking tape when you peel off the splice tape on the frame. This doesn't do much for the head or tail I'll agree.

I think I'm going to try to train booth staff into using rubber bands on house trailers in light of a shipment of new trailers. I've had problems with tape residue being sticky enough that it trips the brain wrap sensor, and ultimately wears down the lamp from a restart right after starting up [Frown] (it's a little embarrassing with an audience too)

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-18-2009 11:56 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
What Jim just posted above is a HUGE pet peeve of mine.
Absolutely.

I had a guy in the booth working for me a few years ago who simply would not...could not...get it into his head that Jim's way is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO much easier. Used to drive me batty.

He no work here no more. [Smile] [thumbsup]

quote: Jarret Chessell
I think I'm going to try to train booth staff into using rubber bands on house trailers
I use rubber bands on all our trailers too. Just make sure when you're training them that they remember to keep their fingers off the print as much as possible or you'll end up with a nice big greasy thumb print right on your green band.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-18-2009 11:59 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
No need for rubber bands if you use the method that has been published right here for years. (The top half is slightly outdated, but scroll about halfway down the page to "WINDING AND STORING TRAILERS".)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.