my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Pro 35 Scratching (Page 2)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Author Topic: Pro 35 Scratching Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 06-29-2009 05:55 AM                        The Pro35 was a very conflicted machine AFAIC. It's quiet, built like a tank, relatively gentle on film, has a shutter that even a 7kW bulb can't burn through, and I like the oil-submersed mechanism concept. The accompanying sound head also works well, if you keep an eye on the shaft bearings. However... That framing coupler is its Achille's heel. I've never seen a Pro35 (even new) that didn't have more vertical jitter than any other projector I've ever used, regardless how often you turn the framer. If you're not sensitive to that, the machine is otherwise decent, but still obsolete. The jitter does drive me crazy, which puts it at the top of my "worst" list. I also don't care for it's mounting scheme... different than everything else out there. I'd go with the other comments, regarding your scratching. I don't think the machine can do that if it's threaded correctly.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-29-2009 07:56 AM                        Out of curiousity, what chains/theatres bought/installed these? I've never even seen one in real life.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-29-2009 08:13 AM                     quote: Scott Norwood Out of curiousity, what chains/theatres bought/installed these? I've never even seen one in real life. Moyers Theaters which is now defunct probably bought more than any other chains did but I am sure there are other largish chains that had them... GKC Theaters in Illinois bought alot of them too. Ballantyne sold a setup consisting of a pair of them automated in which you used hour reels and once the change-over occured the first reel was run backwards through the projector to rewind it . Actually there is a second even more major achilles heel that has appeared since the introduction of estar base film... None of the steel parts inside of it are hardened. Thats what really sets apart the Century and Simplex from the Pro(?)35. The afore mentioned two all have hardened steel gears and intermittent parts. Thats why I said... wait for that film pileup to happen!! Ouch! Mark  |  IP: Logged Martin McCaffery Film God Posts: 2481 From: Montgomery, AL Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-29-2009 08:43 AM                        quote: Scott Norwood Out of curiousity, what chains/theatres bought/installed these? I've never even seen one in real life. Carmike had them in lots of their 1980's builds. In one of their abandoned theaters here in Montgomery, they left all 8 of their Pro35 (incase anyone is looking for parts). I recall using them in a few theatres in the DC area in the 70's-80's. The thing I recall most was the operators manual that had a cartoon dog narrating the whole way. Pretty clear it was not meant to be used by professionals.  |  IP: Logged Edwin Graf Diemer Film Handler Posts: 47 From: Red Bank, NJ, USA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 06-29-2009 09:02 AM                     quote: Scott Norwood Out of curiousity, what chains/theatres bought/installed these? I've never even seen one in real life. The Sameric chain out of Philly loved those systems too-I think it was called the "Sword" made by Eprad. Mark is right-horrible, cheap machine, and jitter was always a problem. Poor sound head too. They broke down often, and once the theater I was at switched to platters the second projector in each pair were used for parts. [ 06-29-2009, 08:32 PM: Message edited by: Adam Martin ]  |  IP: Logged Rod Cornelison Film Handler Posts: 13 From: Jonesboro,AR./ Craighead ,USA Registered: Mar 2009 posted 06-29-2009 12:02 PM                     The theatre we aquired was originally a Carmike, then CEC, now it's ours. On the scratch, I ran a loop of green screen through and threaded it normaly and everything was fine, no scratch. I then increased the size of my bottom loop and BAM! same scratch, same place. it IS hitting the film stripper on the intermitent. Big thanks for all the help.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 06-29-2009 02:28 PM                        The best news yet: You have determined your problem! Louis  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 06-29-2009 02:37 PM                        Glad to hear you found the problem! quote: Mark Gulbrandsen Moyers Theaters which is now defunct probably bought more than any other chains did That's where I ran most of the ones I was around. The Pro 35 installs survived as Moyer became Act III, then Regal. Neither company replaced many of these machines, as far as I know. For that matter, they don't seem to replace/upgrade much of anything after they install it, though I've seen some nice total makeovers.  |  IP: Logged James Westbrook Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1133 From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa Registered: Mar 2006 posted 06-29-2009 02:55 PM                     Mann Theatres installed 4 Pro-35's to be run with hour-long reels when they converted the Fox Twin in Lubbock to the Fox Four in 1974. 3 different machines in that booth until they got 2 sets of 5-deck Potts platters in 1987, then they took out the Simplex 35s and the Norelco DP70s. Back in 74, a fellow named Cecil, who was the main union operator at the Fox then, took a trailer, went to Omaha and picked up the Pro-35s. The only reason I can think of for him doing this was so Ballentyne could show him how to set-up and operate the units. Any time one of the other projectionists would try to steady the image by jamming a pencil eraser in the gate, he would get irate and complain "I went to Omaha to get this, and you are NOT going to jam an eraser in the gate!" I wondered then why Ballentyne didn't just ship them down here...  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 06-29-2009 07:24 PM                    The company I worked for back in the 80's was Mid-States theatres. They had these projectors in practically all of their locations and a lot of them set up for reel to reel operation. They were not the type that Mark mentions but You could rewind on the projector but not through it, the film went around the front of it back up to the supply reel. The location I worked started as a 6 screen it was 4 platter and two changeover until they made it a 10 screen. I spent 7 1/2 years working with those things. Then I jumped ship to a different company and started working with simplexes. During that 7 1/2 years I got to experience som Centurys and Westars. Gained a lot of experience in those first 8 years...  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 06-29-2009 08:32 PM                        quote: James Westbrook I wondered then why Ballentyne didn't just ship them down here... Don't know. Probably the system's best selling point was that it was pretty much a self-contained plug-n-play system. A two-projector setup came with automations that could be run as single-machine or 2-machine changeover. Amplifers were available in each base, one being active and the other sitting in the "slave" machine as a spare. During construction, Ballantyne would send a raceway with all the auditorium and projector interconnects punched out on sockets. You mounted the raceway, connected power, speaker (they were mono), curtains and lights. When the machines arrived, they were put in place, plugged into the raceway, apertures cut & that was pretty much it. All of the systems I worked with came with Strong lamphouses, mounted and aligned. The 2kW supplies could be mounted in the base, if desired, though it made servicing a bit harder. We usually mounted them outside. I worked in several single-screen houses that Moyer bought and multiplexed (ruined). Between them, I had original booths that were equipped with decades-old Brenkerts, E-7s XLs and Centurys. Right off the truck, not one of the brand new Ballantyne machines came close to the image stability of the projectors in the older booths, regardless of brand. To this day, I have never seen anyone get close to locking one of those machines down without frequently shovelling money at them. The lack of hardened parts wasn't so much a problem, unless as Mark said, you jammed the machine. Internal parts tended to break and bend, under the right (wrong) conditions. Otherwise, there was a lot to like. Too bad Ballantyne couldn't finish the job.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 06-29-2009 09:42 PM                        quote: Jack Ondracek Neither company replaced many of these machines, as far as I know. When Act III renovated Cinema World in Eugene in 1995 (expanding from 4 screens to 8 in the process), they went Simplex. Maybe that was an exception.  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 06-30-2009 02:39 AM                        David, I think the love affair with the Pro 35 originated with Tom Moyer. Some of us were convinced he had stock in the company. I don't know of any Ballantyne installs after Tom Moyer & his "Luxury Theatres" (in Washington) became Act III. The sentiment was not shared by his brother, Larry, who had his own chain. Up here, Act III was about half-way through a new build when Regal bought them. The theatre is very nice... none of Moyer's equipment or (thank God) color schemes. Simplex machines throughout, dual digital audio in each console (all SRD, half DTS, half SDDS). Regal finished the job very nicely. It's probably the best theatre we have in this county.  |  IP: Logged Evans A Criswell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1579 From: Huntsville, AL, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 07-02-2009 02:13 PM                        Cobb Theatres used them at the Madison Square 8 [now 12] in Huntsville which opened in 1985. I always noticed a lot of jitter in images there. Touchstar Cinemas now has that theatre and while Regal had it, I believe they replaced all those projectors with another type (and they also put in stadium seating, digital sound, and adjustable screen masking). The Gateway Cinema 4 in Decatur (closed May 2000) may have had one of those projectors in one auditorium, but I can't find where I stashed that info.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2009 04:42 PM                     Ballantyne offered Moyer a leasing option with the PRO35  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.