Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 6 Track Magnetic vs 6 Track Digital (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 11 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  9  10  11 
 
Author Topic: 6 Track Magnetic vs 6 Track Digital
Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 12-30-2010 10:23 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 12-30-2010 11:53 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In many ways the CDS and the sdds are alike. Even the recording camera is the same one.

Perhaps that is a likelier path than reinventing the wheel. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-30-2010 01:18 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of the folks at Optical Radiation Corp (the company behind CDS) went to work at Sony to create SDDS.

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 12-30-2010 02:22 PM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have a few of the ORC folks who went on to work at DTS and now Datasat. One of the big lessons that CDS taught was the importance of existing alongside the analog tracks, both for failsafe and also to eliminate the need for dual inventory of prints. There was an infamous instance of the CDS player overheating for a Days of Thunder premiere and sinking the presentation.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 12-30-2010 04:46 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

ref: The Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers Vol 62 Jan-June 1954

For those who have never seen a mag stiping plant, here is one from the early mag sound era.

It's easy to see why the costs of mag striped prints were so expensive, but as far as sound quality goes the improvement was well worth the extra expenditure.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-30-2010 05:45 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
considering that the ORC and Kodak engineers moved to SDDS when CDS was dropped would explain the similarities

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-30-2010 08:03 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also as of last year there was still to labs that would do limited stripping of prints
but considering the number of recorders that have been showing up on ebay the sounding may be a bigger issue than striping

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-31-2010 12:45 AM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The CDS bitrate and track photography created their own problems at the time, but the other big issue was the electronics in the processor. The processor was essentially a miniature mainframe computer with a huge backplane and numerous large plug in cards filled with microcomputer components. I could see how this setup could create immense heat. Coupled with inadequate cooling which is laughable from what I see with the example I have here, it's not a mystery that hard driven components failed early.
I believe it will be rather simple to repair the power supply, but what concerns me is the onboard firmware. There has been a few postings over the years that seem to indicate the the CDS processor has firmware that is maintained by coin cell batteries and once those die the programming is gone. I have looked very carefully at what I have here and I don't see any battery or other power cell anywhere on the boards. Hopefully if I get a good supply the system will power up and we'll be good to go, but we won't know until the power supply is functional.

One other challenge is that the CDS reader featured a drum coated with a thin rubber layer that the film drove - kind of like a pinch roller in a tape deck. In both of the readers I have here, the rubber has turned to a sticky goo and will have to be removed. The question that remains is whether or not the film can drive a bare steel drum and read the CDS track adequately.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 12-31-2010 01:14 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Daniel Schulz
One of the big lessons that CDS taught was the importance of existing alongside the analog tracks, both for failsafe and also to eliminate the need for dual inventory of prints. There was an infamous instance of the CDS player overheating for a Days of Thunder premiere and sinking the presentation.
quote: Variety, July 4, 1990
"New Digital Sound System Snafus At 'Thunder' Sites"

A glitch in a heralded new sound system forced several theaters to pull prints of "Days of Thunder" over the weekend.

Officials of the joint venture of Eastman Kodak and Optical Radiation Corporation could not be reached for an explanation of the failure of their Digital Cinema Sound [sic]. But film's distrib, Paramount, confirmed that the much-advertised digital prints were pulled from at least three theaters.

Key houses lost were Mann's Chinese Theater in Hollywood and its National in Westwood, and Pacific's Cinema Theater in Corte Madera in Northern California. It's understood the same problem may have developed at Pacific's Lakewood house, but no one at the exhibitor's office could confirm.

A Cinema staffer said some "Thunder" dialog began dropping out in the sixth screening after the Wednesday opening. Par quickly arranged for the houses to switch to 70mm Dolby prints.

Digital Cinema Sound [sic] also is used on "Dick Tracy," but a Buena spokesman said that film has had no troubles, suggesting to some that the "Thunder" blunder may have been due to the rush to get pic ready for its opening.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-31-2010 02:13 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sean Weitzel
The question that remains is whether or not the film can drive a bare steel drum and read the CDS track adequately.
For 35mm, I'll bet if you pull the film through an SDDS 3000 series reader before it hits the CDS reader, I'll bet you it will work just fine. For 70mm...not so much.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-31-2010 02:39 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sean Weitzel
I believe it will be rather simple to repair the power supply, but what concerns me is the onboard firmware.
This issue is one example of why I am wondering how hard it would be to put together some other kind of setup that could actually play the CDS sound data off one of those film prints.

That existing CDS gear could be "dead" for a number of reasons. Any piece of computing or electronics gear is going to eventually die for various reasons. Certain pieces of hardware break or wear out over time through use. At some point you can't buy replacement parts to get it fixed. Then you're forced to buy something new.

It may be possible to revive CDS through use of software in a computer system and a more up to date film reader that works much better than the old circa 1990 models. Some of this reminds me how people are using MAME to play old coin operated video games without the actual game cabinets. Of course, this approach isn't quite the same as having a fully functional CDS system. But the audience wouldn't know the difference.

SDDS is already a near-dead format, at least in terms of hardware. What does someone do if an existing reader or piece of hardware in the processor breaks? I'm not sure if you can still buy any of that stuff brand new. Probably have to cannibalize parts of another SDDS unit. The same may hold true for first generation DTS players. I doubt Toshiba still makes those 2X speed SCSI CD-ROM drives. What is Datasat able to do to support three drive DTS-6D machines, or the 6AD cinema processor? Can someone repair a broken Dolby Digital DA-10 system from 1992?

Commercial movie theaters have been transitioning to digital cinema for a few years now. That's putting a lot of Dolby Digital, DTS and SDDS players out of service. Eventually those three lossy compressed digital formats will be "dead." Many thousands of movies with film prints encoded in those formats will still be around and be playable if there is any compatible hardware to do the job.

Wouldn't it be cool to have a system that could play all of those audio formats? One reader that can see all the digital audio formats for 35mm and 70mm. One piece of rack gear that can process all the audio codecs. It sounds silly at first, but CDS is dead, SDDS is near dead, Dolby Digital and DTS are still viable but their parent companies have shifted focus away from 35mm/70mm to digital cinema efforts, etc. The various patent holders could cooperate to allow a new, even more precise film reader to be developed. It might be possible to use a computer to process the audio and then somehow send it to a cinema processor. The idea of using a computer instead of a dedicated piece of rack mounted gear is that it could cut costs and also allow the all purpose system to have a much longer life span. When one computer breaks and can no longer be serviced, just replace it and reinstall the software.

I don't know. It's kind of fun thinking about those possibilities. But the obstacles in making such hardware are obvious. And then you have the movie studios who own the rights to the movies. If you're running a revival house and want to play a certain classic title the studio may prefer to just send a digital cinema hard disc or Blu-ray instead of shipping an old 35mm film print.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 12-31-2010 05:59 PM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
. What does someone do if an existing reader or piece of hardware in the processor breaks? I'm not sure if you can still buy any of that stuff brand new.
Any new SDDS product will have parts available till 2014. Anything that is discontiuned will have parts available for 10 after the date of discontinue. The info is on the SDDS.com website in a PDF

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-01-2011 11:47 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
fyi: There are no DA-10's; Dolby exchanged them all for DA-20s at no charge. A classy thing to do. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 01-01-2011 02:13 PM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
DTS had the philosophy that 6-track audio should be in every neighborhood theater. That gave the company a permanent foothold in the market.
Forgive me for disagreeing, but what got DTS a permanent foothold in the market was cost and George Lucas. DTS was half the cost of Dolby Digital and SDDS, and when Lucas demanded theatres be equipped with digital sound in order to book the Star Wars Special Editions in 1997, that's when they exploded. Houses in smaller markets like the one I was managing at the time (one of two theatres in a town of 44,000) went with the least expensive option.

Strangely, Lucasfilm didn't inspect the theatres it demanded digital sound from, and my competitor in town bought a $350 Dolby Home Theatre system, set it in their booth and told Lucasfilm they had set up a Dolby Digital system, stealing Jedi away from my theatre. Not set the home theatre system up, but just set it in the booth. Still boxed up. Never installed. But then, they went out of business less than a year later, so they were never that much of a threat to begin with.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-01-2011 04:57 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
fyi: There are no DA-10's; Dolby exchanged them all for DA-20s at no charge. A classy thing to do.
Yah, but Louis, they discontinued the DA-20s, effectively putting everyone else who made a processor out of business. Either you get a CP650 & > or you don't play SRD. Not so classy; in fact, a pretty shabby.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 11 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  9  10  11 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.