Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Theaters still running 35mm (please read the specifics) (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
Author Topic: Theaters still running 35mm (please read the specifics)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2015 10:23 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone heard if the predicted higher rents for film prints have come to pass or are the studios still selling at the same terms as with digital?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2015 10:33 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At least WB has with rep runs. Just was booking a kid mat with WB. They quoted me a bunch more for the 35mm than the DCP. Not sure how that plays out first run.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Metcalfe
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 134
From: Austin, TX, U.S.
Registered: May 2010


 - posted 04-21-2015 07:29 PM      Profile for Jason Metcalfe   Email Jason Metcalfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad is probably going to hate me for this but I would really love to see a thread like this for all of the rep theaters that are running 35mm and 70mm, there's a pretty big list over at the Northwest Chicago Film Society Sprocket School wiki but I'm sure there are some venues that are missing:
http://www.sprocketschool.org/wiki/List_of_analog_film_exhibitors

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 04-22-2015 10:56 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Buck Wilson
Regal WestRidge 8 still running 100% 35mm second run. Topeka KS. Unknown conversion date.
This site converted to Sony 4ks last week.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Campbell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered: Jul 2007


 - posted 04-23-2015 12:16 AM      Profile for Mark Campbell   Email Mark Campbell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seattle Area update:
Regal East Valley 13 in Renton (2nd run) has gone digital.
Admiral Twin in West Seattle still 35mm but plans to convert and become a quad sometime this fall.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-23-2015 12:08 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That Sprocket School site is interesting to put it mildly - symptomatic of the AMIA / "Film Forever" tendency who seem to believe that because they've come from an archival film handling background and then done a one-day course in which they've threaded a machine and done a changeover or two, the future of analog film presentation is safe with them.

I had one such person come in a little while back, interested in projection work: she had a master's degree in film handling and clearly knew her acetate from her polyester. After we'd chatted for a few minutes, I mentioned to her that the previous evening, a nasty ground hum had suddenly appeared on the left surround channel whenever the digital projector's bulb was on. How, I asked, would she go about trying to investigate what was causing that? Her answer: wouldn't know where to start - call a tech. Next question - the sound suddenly goes out halfway through a reel (which actually happened to me last week - exciter blew). What would you do? Her answer was the same - call a tech. And as for the DCP server and projector, she'd never even seen one!

It was clear to me, sadly, that this girl would need many months if not years under constant, full time training and supervision before she could safely be left with a show on her own. These kids don't seem to understand that to work in the dwindling number of venues still projecting film, the ability to make elegant splices (taking two hours to check and prep each reel, which their bosses won't be able to pay for - if I take more than an hour to examine and prepare a 6-8 reel print, mine will want to know why) and appreciate the rich blacks in an IB print is not relevant: the ability to understand the equipment in the booth, fix minor faults and work around major ones is what's important.

This website mirrors this tendency exactly: lots of stuff on prints and film handling, but nothing on equipment maintenance, troubleshooting and repair. The pages for projector models are blank, and there aren't even any blank pages for the common models of audio processor!

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 04-24-2015 11:17 AM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
That Sprocket School site is interesting to put it mildly - symptomatic of the AMIA / "Film Forever" tendency who seem to believe that because they've come from an archival film handling background and then done a one-day course in which they've threaded a machine and done a changeover or two, the future of analog film presentation is safe with them.
Leo, it's exactly this attitude that is costing us people who are potentially interested in learning equipment maintenance and troubleshooting, but find themselves put off and out by "old timers" who think it's more important to criticize what is likely the last regime of film projectionists rather than pass along valuable information.

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-24-2015 12:05 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jack

It is not about being put-off by "Old Timers" like myself...

Where to begin? Going back to the dawn of cinema exhibition, the people who engineered, manufactured and operated this equipment all had multitudes of skills including formal backgrounds in engineering, machining, electrical and later, electronics, not to mention being Showmen". Threading a projector and running a change-over is just "the icing on the cake".

My formal background is in aviation maintenance, tool making/precision machining and manufacturing engineering.

How many times have I been called out to repair a booth that had been heavily abused! Solutions included being in the machine shop either repairing or making custom parts.... and hitting up local "mom & pop" hardware or electrical supply stores as a MacGyver to come up with a creative and quality solution to a problem on very short notice thereby preventing a dark screen!

These are not attributes that can be taught over-night!!

What irritates me are seeing videos of so-called "projectionists" who make themselves cozy in the booth recliner...and even worse, booths that are utter pig-stys!. Step 1 is having the discipline to have a spotless booth...and I guarantee you that there is no such thing as break time in a properly run 20-plex!

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 04-24-2015 12:16 PM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No argument there, Will. I still deal with "projectionists" (almost exclusively "old timers") who were probably always and still are awful projectionists and have terrible habits.

On the other hand, I know a number of people under 40—some even on this group!—who are excellent technicians in their own right.

What I don't like, and encountered frequently when I started projecting, is the attitude by those who have the knowledge of, "hah, look at this young turk who can appreciate an IB print, but doesn't know a drive shaft from a timing belt!"

Everybody started somewhere. And everyone started as just an operator. And many of us (no thanks to SOME) learned well from folks who SHOWED us how to do it instead of saying, "you're no projectionist!"

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-24-2015 12:53 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jack: I would be more than happy to spend as much time as it takes. Sadly, the money isn't there in my organization to hire and train an apprentice. My point is that if we hired someone out of film archiving school, or an experimental filmmaker who has done a bit of Super 8 or 16mm, that's effectively what we'd be doing. I suspect that most of the other venues that are trying to make a strategic, long-term commitment to preserving the ability to project film are in the same position.

I'm also conscious that the skills base above mine is fragile, too. For example, we recently had a fault with our CP200, which, for all my trawling through the service manual and having used them on and off since 1992, I couldn't identify and fix. Luckily for us, a Dolby tech visited us to tune the room for a big premiere shortly afterwards (for which we weren't using that processor at all), and kindly took a look at it for us. Simply by knowing instinctively where to look because he'd been servicing these things more or less since they were first made, he found the problem in three minutes flat. But Dolby doesn't officially support the CP200 any more, and the techs on their workforce who are experienced in working on them is only going to dwindle from here on in.

I'm not trying to p!ss off or alienate the archive-based movement to preserve film projection, but I do believe that they are not going to achieve what they're trying to achieve just by doing what they're doing. From here on in, trying to maintain and regularly use the ability to show 16/35/70 is going to be like trying to commute daily (and reliably) in a 30-year old car with 300,000 miles on the clock. It can be done, but someone who knows all there is to know about the design and aesthetic qualities of the vehicle, but not how to adjust the valve clearances, is really going to struggle.

What would really help is a workshop in which attendees are taught to strip a Norelco to the chassis and rebuild it under the supervision of someone who's been doing that for a living since the 1960s, or troubleshoot a misbehaving CP200.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 04-25-2015 04:10 PM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Therein lies the problem. Archival theaters want an archival film handler, but they also want a projectionist. As you stated well, that's not what these folks are being trained as. While I agree that there should be a place to train projectionists (film OR digital), film archives might not be the best place for this, or for the hiring pool.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-26-2015 12:04 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jack Theakston
Archival theaters want an archival film handler, but they also want a projectionist.
They actually need more than a projectionist: they need someone with a skill set that in the mainstream days of film projection, a rank-and-file projectionist - even a chief - was not required to have. In those days, projectionists hired by a theater did film handling and basic, planned maintenance (e.g. replacing xenon bulbs). More complex maintenance and repair tasks were done by a tech working for the chain centrally, if your venue was owned by a chain, or by a service contractor if it was an independent. That layer of maintenance and repair support is now almost gone and will be totally gone within a few years.

Sorry to harp on about this, but I think the analogy with a keeping a classic car in everyday use is a good one. If you're trying to keep your 1972 Chevy El Camino in reliable enough condition for daily commuting, you're going to have to stay ahead of the game by replacing and adjusting components that the car's owner would not have had to touch (or pay anyone else to touch) during the first decade or so of its life. You're going to have to spot early warning signs of future failure, and make strategic decisions about what jobs you're going to do preemptively and what you're going to not worry about until symptoms appear. You're going to have to identify sources of model-specific replacement parts, including ones intended for other vehicles and non-automotive use that'll work on yours. And you're going to have to do all of this without the safety net of being able to take the car to a local shop if you run out of time and/or knowledge to fix something, because the local shops will probably say sorry, we're not able to work on a car that old and specialized.

The same applies to maintaining the projector heads, lamphouses, rectifiers and audio A-chain and B-chain components in a film projector booth. No-one makes or supports film projectors any more. No-one makes or supports audio processors with film sound playback capability anymore (apart from the optical sound add-on card for the AP20). If laser projection becomes the industry norm, xenon bulbs may go away as well, which will be a huge problem. I come from a film archival background originally too, but worked as a projectionist alongside my training in that (which no-one else I did my degree with did, or showed any interest in doing). In those days, being a projectionist meant being a film handler with only very basic repair/maintenance/troubleshooting skills on top. In the remaining 16/35/70 booths, someone with only those skills is not going to be able to keep the shows going for very long. If the "Film Forever" tendency really wants to keep those shows going, repair, troubleshooting and maintenance is the area of training and support that is missing from all of these advocacy/support websites and where the resources really need to be developed.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Montes
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: United States
Registered: Feb 2010


 - posted 04-26-2015 01:55 PM      Profile for Manny Montes   Email Manny Montes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that theres definitely a problem on both ends of the spectrum. One is that most people who are film archival experts are not electrical engineers or sound engineers and probably aren't great projectionists either, they have a very specific skillset. Just like most projectionists/techs wouldn't be great at film archival. The other issue is that no one is willing to pay for someone to have both skill sets as you pointed out (both in time to train an apprentice as well as actual cash). I somehow doubt that the film forever group is going to really invest a lot into training a measureable amount of people these skills, which IMHO is their downfall, as you said, there won't be support companies for this equipment forever, so it is important to gain the knowledge now.

Another problem I think Jack hit pretty well is that there are a lot of old timers who think that if you weren't projecting film in the 70s with a carbon arc changover then you're useless (i've heard the term platter baby used before). Corollary to that there are young guns who look at the old timers as just antiques of an era gone by. I think this has to do more with what type of PEOPLE they are rather than their status/age, i've seen jerks on both sides of the fence, so I don't think you can point a finger at either side for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 04-26-2015 02:23 PM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The is certainly little support for replacement of equipment, but necessity is also the mother of invention. You can bring back whatever you want if you have enough money. But "film forever" is, of course, an unrealistic attitude given that the manufacture of film is quickly dwindling, the prints won't last forever, and I still don't see any high rollers doing anything to really keep it afloat (ie. finance it). And I don't think there is any argument that although there are still plenty of machines out there, no one is making them new or supporting the old ones and those are going to go away eventually.

The point is that there are still many people alive today who know what they're doing, and there's a great amount written by dead people for those who don't. Most film technology is based on fairly simple (by comparison) electrical and mechanical engineering. And so long as the people who have this knowledge share it—this forum is a great example of just that—there's still hope yet.

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Shaw
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 238
From: Boston, MA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-18-2015 05:51 PM      Profile for Larry Shaw   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Shaw   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fine Arts Theatre, Maynard, MA
2 screens, both 35mm first run only
Kinoton PK-60D/Super Lume-X/CP-650

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.