Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Drive-In - FM transmission coverage issues (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Drive-In - FM transmission coverage issues
Tim Sherman
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: North Ridgeville, OH, USA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 07-07-2016 05:35 AM      Profile for Tim Sherman   Author's Homepage   Email Tim Sherman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well that transmitter is at least part of the problem i would say. That unit is probably from the late 1990s. And if i'm not mistaken technically isn't a FM transmitter. I believe it is actually a cable tv rf modulator and runs a 75 ohm antenna, that thing was very low power when it was new and was also re-branded so many times for different companies. I used to run 2 of them.

Get rid of it and put in a BW Broadcast tx5 and a matching antenna. Do not use your current antenna as it is 75ohm and most if not all commercial transmitters are 50ohm. not only will you cover your field with ease you will also have an amazing increase in sound quality.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 07-07-2016 05:38 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte, you have a fairly low-power system there. Those modulators were originally intended for inserting FM stations in cable systems. Yours could possibly manage as much as 100mW (1/10 watt), but there's no way to tell if it's actually doing that without measuring it there. It could be much less.

From your pictures, it doesn't look like antenna placement is the problem.

If this thing ever did work well and the modulator hasn't conked out, I'd still have a look at the coax and antenna connections. If they're OK, then I'd try moving the frequency. Your FM band is really full there, but at the bottom of the dial is 88.1 (K201EO). It's putting out only 10 watts and its main contour just barely touches the northeast corner of Boise, some 20 miles from your drive-in. Try moving your transmitter to 88.3 & see what you get. On the dial, it's close to the translator, but farther away from KOAY, which has more power on 88.7. If your problem is proximity to other stations, this might help.

If none of that works, then I think you're a candidate for a new transmitter and antenna.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 07-07-2016 08:55 AM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although I'm far from an expert in this area, I know a bit about this stuff as I do tech support for a community radio station with a 2KW EIRP transmitter on a small mountain, which covers a fairly large area.

quote: Monte L Fullmer
Some portions of the field receives the signal with no issues, and some areas, the signal comes in rather sketchy, or none at all. We have a side yard that carries the overflow and also experience broadcast issues.
"Sketchy" to me sounds like insufficient signal strength. For FM to work well, the signal level at the receiver has to be sufficient to ensure the receiver is "fully quieting", once this signal level is reached then the amplitude modulations caused by stuff like car moving, people walking in front of the antenna etc do not cause the signal level to drop, and the audio to become scratchy. Theres a number that it is considered one has to reach to get acceptable performance, and that is 66 dBuV/M. There are tools that given the parameters can calculate the coverage. But for a problem the size a field, the coverage prediction tools are a bit of a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

The Inverse square law applies to the signal propgated from transmitting antenna, and - all things being equal - as the distance from the transmit antenna to your receiver increases, the signal strength drops. As some of your receivers are close, and others are relatively far, the drop-off is quite pronounced that close in.

Solutions: The obvious is more transmitter power, with the caveat that any time anyone transmits anything anywhere there may be legal implications and licensing to deal with, don't know how your rules work in the USA. Less obvious, a directional antenna to take the same transmitter power and "shape" it in a specific way, so that the effective power (EIRP) goes up in the direction you need it to, whilst reducing radiation in directions you don't require it.

Given you've got a transmitter the local folk regard as dodgy, then a new transmitter is the obvious solution.

Mark's already mentioned BW broadcast; their current range of transmitters, the V2s, also have on-board processing; Jack mentioned that the dynamic range of digital cinema is far too wide for FM radio to handle sensibly, and so this is a perfect one box solution. You can easily spend far more than the price of a low power transmitter on a processor, and especially if you want a big brand processor like an Optimod.

Sadly BW no longer seem to do "small" transmitters, the TX50 being the smallest, but it turns down to 5W; If 5W is still too much power, then a simple resistive dropper will reduce it still further.

Make sure the antenna - whatever it is - is impedance matched to the transmitter, which, unless you want to spend more time tuning antennas than showing movies, means a 50R antenna.

The transmitter (as is any half-decent FM transmitter) is stereo; to take advantage of this for the best audio to the vehicle, you'll need to arrange a stereo + centre feed to the TX from cinema audio system. Of course, dome folks will have their stereo backwards, so the screen movement will be opposite the audio...

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 07-07-2016 10:57 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi, David. Are you sure about the TX5 being discontinued? I still see it on their web site, and the major US distributor has it on theirs as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-07-2016 04:54 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never come across a BW, here in Canada I only see Decade transmitters. Made in Canada - at least the last one I inspected didn't say China...
These seem very reliable and with the USD strong they're cheaper than BW as well.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 07-07-2016 05:49 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jack Ondracek
Hi, David. Are you sure about the TX5 being discontinued?
My bad Jack; there is a TX5 V2, webpage. I was sure it had been killed off, turns out I've remembered it wrong. Sometimes, its good to be wrong [Smile]

This looks the perfect solution for a drive-in, power level is variable from 0.05W (ie 50mW) to 5W, and its got the integrated audio processing the rest of the V2 series has.

quote: Dave Macaulay
I've never come across a BW, here in Canada
That's odd; they are available all over the world, even here in New Zealand. I wonder if Canada has some regulatory weirdness that BW kit is not certified for. You could order online from Broadcast Warehouse, they ship all over the world.

quote: Dave Macaulay
I only see Decade transmitters
Never come across these, but I note they don't have an integrated audio processor, which is the big win with the BW V2 series. Add a quarter-decent external processor, at over a grand, and suddenly the BW V2 kit looks very value priced [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-07-2016 06:31 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since i dont see a DOC sertification any one in Canada that ran one wouold be subject if caught to massive fines that start at 6 zeros for operating a transmitter outside of DOC regulations
Currently the only legal one in Canada is the Decade

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 07-07-2016 07:10 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
Currently the only legal one in Canada is the Decade
Last I checked, and it was a while back, the Decade transmitter was solid, but a bit expensive for the value received. the BW gear now includes a raft of internal features... many of which might not be useful to a drive-in, but I put a lot of these in US translator installations. The processor is a bit lightweight, but certainly suitable for a drive-in. It will also auto-shutoff after so many minutes with no audio. It also has a built-in web interface, which makes any adjustments easy.

For the price, the Decade models I last looked at had none of this. A solid exciter... but not much else. I did check the web site and, after paying $1,600 for their most-comparable transmitter (but only 1.8 watts), you'd need to add some kind of processor/limiter for an effective drive-in box. That'd put it in the $2,000+ range. The UK price (from their site) for the TX-5 V2 is $1,500, fully loaded.

Gordon, If you're following US and Canadian legalities, the only Decade box that an unlicensed Canadian drive-in (or US one, for that matter) could legally use would be their MS-100. The power level of that product is so limited that you probably couldn't get to the screen with its signal. It claims 150 feet for the Canadian power level, which is more than what's allowed by FCC part 15. In order to comply, I think you're also required to use the box's internal antenna.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-07-2016 10:41 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I did use a TX-5 last summer at an install in Eastern Utah. Its still set at .25 watts though. I have lots of TX-1's running and they have been pretty reliable. Only issue has been a non-polarized feedback capacitor in the PLL feedback loop that fails. Replacing the caps gets em going again.

Mark

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-08-2016 12:41 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
TX-5 is still on the BW Web site so is obviously currently made. The current one is the TX-5 V2 which is the one I installed last summer in Eastern Utah. In the past I have always had to wait for one to be built as none of their transmitters are actually stocked, so don't expect to get one in a big hurray unless they just happen to have one laying around. A month wait is typical.

TX-5V2

Best thing about the V2 transmitters is the remote app. I have this app running on all my V-2 transmitters on the booth computer.

Remote Access App Demo

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Sherman
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: North Ridgeville, OH, USA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 07-08-2016 02:12 PM      Profile for Tim Sherman   Author's Homepage   Email Tim Sherman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Never had a problem getting the TX5 V2 I have had them sent overnight as well. I also know of someone who just ordered one about a month ago and received it right away. Broadcast Warehouse even has a "Drive-In Movie Package"
http://www.broadcastwarehouse.com/drive-in-movie-package/40/package

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 07-08-2016 06:40 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Sherman
Broadcast Warehouse even has a "Drive-In Movie Package"
Very cool. How can a drive-in go wrong with this?

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 07-08-2016 09:55 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember, guys, mount the antenna LOW. You are illegal on power. Keep it low; it will cover the drive in. You don't need 5 miles.

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 07-09-2016 11:41 AM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A few neighborhood Christmas light shows synchronized to music violate the FCC every year. I drove through one a couple of Christmas' ago and still picked up the music a mile away after leaving...

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 07-09-2016 12:38 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Without going into politics, I will state that the FCC is simply out of its league and rarely if ever does anything about low power ( < 10 watt) FM transmissions. As was said many Xmas light shows violate the rules and there are many FM transmitters in the 1-5 watt range available on Amazon and other sites at very low cost (with very low audio quality and reliability to match in many cases.)

When I was living in Los Angeles it was a common thing for the FM (and sometimes AM) band to be stuffed with many stations, most of which were obviously not licensed commercial operators. Out here in Idaho there are some FM operations that are evidently not licensed also.

I agree with Louis that regardless of your transmitter's power, keep the antenna low enough to cover your intended area with a little spill over to counteract any adverse temporary conditions. This works well with FM ..AM is another story as skip can make even a low power signal audible for many miles.

Avoid sandwiching between two close frequency commercial stations whenever possible..it will avoid a lot of headaches for you as the operator and the people trying to pick up your audio (as a LOT of car radios these days have absolutely horrible FM sensitivity and selectivity).

Back to Monte's situation..his antenna is a simple monopole design...not too efficient really. Great for reception but bad for transmission.

I have built a few of the Ramsey kits (with a few mods to get rid of hum and improve audio quality) for motocross tracks...even at the legal FCC power they put out I got great results because I made a 1/4 wave antenna with four ground plane radials for them. (All rods 1/4" solid aluminum stock with a 4" dia. by 1" thick solid aluminum base.)

At the legal power level and with a 20' average mounting height, I got excellent coverage to about 1/2 mile in most cases, and at one track I had a signal (with a bit of flutter and noise) within 1 full mile of the track.

So in Montes' case I suggest he try a better antenna mounted to just clear the top of the roof (same location as the existing one would do fine) before spending $1,500 on a new transmitter. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.