Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » DTS DVDs (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: DTS DVDs
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-24-2001 08:47 PM      Profile for Jerry Chase   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't understand this.

"The light is refracted within the cable, spdif uses a multi-mode cable so the light is refrated randomly and there are many different paths the light can take in the pipe , but if the cable moves the light path changes, sometimes slighty altering the length of the paths. Hence if there is vibration on the optical fibre (subwoofer induced...etc) the time base of the digital signal at the reciver is not steady because the transmision distance is constantly changing.

This error is Jitter and is usually very slight. Jitter can be eliminated by most DAC circuits by using a buffer and a crystal, to correct the time base. The buffer stores the bits and a crystal clock is used to read the data off the buffer at a regular rate."


"sometimes slighty altering the length of the paths"

source of figures used in my extrapolations = this web page


I must be missing something here. Speed of light = 186,000+ miles per second, IIRC. Upper limit of human hearing = ~ 20,000 cps. Average length of optical cable in home system =~ 10 ft. 5,280 feet = 1 mile.

5280 ft x 186000 miles = 982,080,000 feet.

A one cycle per second wave (analog) would travel that many feet in a second.

Divide that by 20,000 cycles and you get 49104 feet as the length of a 20,000 cycle per second wave as light (the shortest audible analog wave).

There are 1200cent in one octave. Average users can tolerate deviances of up to 50cent from a base note, while professional musicians pick up differences between 10 - 20 cent. A well-trained musician with good discriminating abilities can pick up differences of as little as 5cent.

5 / 1200 = 1/240th of an octave as the smallest interval discernable within an octave, where the highest "normal" octave (a"") has "a" at 3,950 cps and notes double in frequency 7,900 cps are generally only heard as harmonics.

Assuming the best ear, listening for variations in the highest octave, can discern 1/240th of the octave as a discrete variation. That is a variation of no less than 16 cps.

So Joe Pro, musician, listening to a note at 7,900 cps detects a 16 cps variation. How much of a different distance must the light travel to reach that variation?
124313.92 feet per wave of 7,900 cps
124062.65 feet per wave of 7,916 cps

difference = 251.27 feet

To add this distance, the light in the 10' cable would have to bounce within the cable more than 12 times.

So, for appreciable "jitter", on part of the wave the light would have perfect throughput, and then quickly degrade to a reflection requiring the light to bounce in the cable more than 12 times before completing its journey.

I'm not saying that this isn't possible, or that I might be off the mark in my thinking, but the math doesn't seem to support the concept of "jitter" for analog sound in optical cables. If you can keep from wincing at the pun, could someone enlighten me? Is there encoding in optical signals that is more sensitive?


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-24-2001 09:08 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sound through optical (TOSlink) cables is almost always in the digital realm. I don't know a hell of a lot about jitter, so I'm not going to try to throw equations at you, but I have read a lot about it and how it actually is an issue (albiet probably a small one) with digital sound.

Coaxial is cheaper anyway. TOSlink provides absolutely no advantage whatsoever. Therefore coaxial=much better.


 |  IP: Logged

Phil Connolly
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Derby, England
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-25-2001 04:51 AM      Profile for Phil Connolly   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Connolly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Digital audio signals need a much higher bandwidth than analogue.

For uncompressed audio on an SPDIF cable you transmit 32 bits per sample (even if only 16 bits are used for audio), 64 bits per stereo pair, and at 44.1khz x 64 = 2822400 bits per second. So the signal travelling down the fibre is opproximatly 3MHz and could be suseptible to Jitter. As far as I know DTS and AC-3 signals have similar bandwidths to PCM. In fact as data rates increase for 24-bit/96khz, multichannel, Meridian loss-less packing, SACD, etc.. jitter could be more of a problem on optical connectors.

My math ablity is not good enough to work out the quantity of virabtion on the fibre needed to cause errors on a 3Mhz signal, but it is possible.

Whether or not jitter is audible is another argument altogether. But you do come across people who if there is a measurable error in audio they clame to be able to hear it. This could open up the 44.1khz sampling rate vs 96Khz sampling rate aurgument.


 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-27-2001 02:34 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DTS on laserdisc and CD uses a fixed bitrate, which is actually higher than their theatrical system. DTS on DVD can be variable though- the first movies Universal released seperately in DTS are full bit-rate, but most of the newer ones that have both 5.1 Dolby and DTS on the same discs are not.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 10-18-2014 01:46 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 4799 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 10-18-2014 01:46 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Decided to pick up the Tom Hanks three pack of The Money Pit, The Burbs, and Dragnet at Target today for $3. Out all freaking movies, I always preferred DTS @ home, but out of all movies Universal decided to release The Money Pit on DVD in DTS Digital. WTF?

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 10-25-2014 01:05 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Probably because Amblin had something to do with that movie. What a thread bump- DTS is practically the dominant format on Blu-Ray nowadays. When I think of all the crap DVDs I bought just to see that DTS indicator light up...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.