Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » DVD and 35mm Film Projection (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: DVD and 35mm Film Projection
Ron Yost
Master Film Handler

Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-13-2006 10:02 PM      Profile for Ron Yost   Email Ron Yost   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've owned an 'original' Infocus X1 almost three years and have been extremely pleased with it from the beginning. It produces a truly beautiful image, especially from anamorphic DVD's.

The 4805 is a newer 16:9 machine that is extremely well regarded by users, as you can see above. I don't use my 35mm setup much since I bought the X1.

You won't need any additional lenses. These are 21st Century machines, not 19th. [Big Grin] I'd avoid getting hung up on the lumens ratings too much .. especially for a small screen and throw as you're contemplating (mine is about the same). Compared to all the fuss (and expense) of 35mm, a VP setup is so simple and straightforward .. once you get the projector settings 'tweaked' to your liking. Then there's that magnificent 5.1 sound to enjoy along with it.

One thing I've learned is that there are major differences between the projectors out there .. even within a given manufacturer's line, one machine may be suitable for HT use and another isn't. I'd be really cautious about purchasing any projector without doing some serious online research first. Take the time to find out what actual owners of the machines, and unbiased reviewers like Projector Central, have to say about them for HT use.

A good place to start is the AVS Forums, though you could spend days reading the threads. I'll place a link here for the 'Display Devices' forums menu at AVS. From here you can access the 'Digital Projectors - Under $3500' forum from the listing:

AVS Forum - Display Devices menu

Another really good source of info, as I mentioned above, is 'Projector Central':

Projector Central

Please don't buy that HP machine until you check out what's available. You'll find much more suitable machines for HT use by doing some research. Also, if you buy from a local brick-and-mortar HT dealer you'll pay as much as a third more, and the machines all have to be returned to their maker's service centers should service be necessary. I bought my X1 from Best Buy.

I hope you're as amazed as I was when you fire up your new 'toy'. I still love it! [beer]

Ron Yost

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-14-2006 10:27 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for your comments. I will look into the Infocus units. Since Kodak recommends them, these are most likely good machines. The only thing I have against Kodak is their service issues. One minute they service a product and the next they don't. I have a Kodak DC420 camera that originally cost $10,000 that is now worth nothing because I can't upgrade or even get it fixed by Kodak. It's about the same with their Dye Sub printers.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-14-2006 12:38 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Unfortunately, as with most things containing digital ICs and custom sensors, eventually parts become unavailable.

That 12 year old 1.5-megapixel DC420 camera and 105MB hard drive would even be outperformed by Kodak's low end consumer digital cameras that sell for about $100 today that can use 1GB solid state memory:

http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2/3/9/19&pq-locale=en_US

quote:

Digital Cameras
EASYSHARE-ONE
Point and Shoot Series
High Zoom Series
Pocket Series
Performance Series
Digital Photo Solutions
Compare Cameras
Reconditioned Digital Cameras
Owner's Support Center
KODAK EASYSHARE System

What Kodak dye sublimation printer do you have? Most have a one year warrantee, and service and spare parts should be available beyond that:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/products/replacementParts.jhtml?pq-path=4437

quote:
Ordering Parts You Can Replace on Your KODAK Digital Camera and Printer Dock
Our cameras and printer docks contain some parts that you can replace yourself. If user-replaceable parts are available for your product, you will find them below. If you do not find your part listed below, you must send your product to a Kodak authorized repair center for part replacement. If repair is necessary, please use our Interactive Troubleshooting Guide to set up your repair request online.



 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-14-2006 01:16 PM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Actually it was a 4MB unit with a PCMCIA card. It worked great and it was a Nikon M90 camera. It would be nice if you could just pull off the 420 back and replace it with the latest technology. It would also be nice if they could upgrade it. I understand you can convert these back to film but lots of luck finding a roll back for it.

Anyway someone is selling an InFocus X2 for $650. He is saying it only has 3 hours on it. Is this a good projector and buy?

[ 03-14-2006, 05:15 PM: Message edited by: Larry Myers ]

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Yost
Master Film Handler

Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-14-2006 11:57 PM      Profile for Ron Yost   Email Ron Yost   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NO, the X2 is definitely NOT suited for HT. It's a stripped-down X1/4800/4805 without the special circuitry and chips that makes the others perform as well as they do for low-end HT. It's designed as a data projector only.

A low-hour 4805 would probably be OK, but I wouldn't buy a used one without knowing the seller.

I haven't really kept up with all the recent offerings and won't until my X1 dies.

Why not do a little research yourself? A simple visit to Projector Central will tell you exactly why the X2 isn't for HT. If you don't do the research you've got a very good chance of winding up with a machine you won't be happy with because most of them are data projectors and are not suitable for showing movies .. especially at the low-end.

Ron Yost

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-15-2006 07:10 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Ron I am doing research but I am only 3 days into it. So now I know that it's not only brand that seems to be important but also the interbrand names. I have between $1500 and $2000 to spend. I knew something was up when the price was under $700. I just didn't know what. Thanks

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-15-2006 03:03 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For a home theater your size, a small cheap projector should do just fine. My input is on the screen itself. Wouldn't a silver screen instead of white produce a better contrast ratio? Wouldn't this be especially important with a lower end projector?

I haven't really kept up on the issue in the last couple of years or so, but I remember having better luck with silver tone screens on video projection.

just a thought

Ciao

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-15-2006 04:11 PM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
I am not really looking to replace the screen. I really don't have a lot of money in it but I got it exactly the way I want it to look. It's a scope screen with a nice little curve to it. I also spent a lot of time looking at white paint to get the white white I wanted. With the rigging of dark red velvet drapes, it looks great and expensive. Total cost though was about $50 with $10 for wallboard, $20 for 2x4's, $15 for paint, and a whole bolt (very heavy) of dark red velvet for $15 at Walmart. It was like 15 yards by 36 inches wide folded over at $1 a yard. The setup covers the whole 8.5x11 ft cement back wall. So in many respects it just like a theater. Pull back the drape and you see cement with a screen on stilts. With the other two sides, all I needed to do is just add wallboard which is cheap. Most of the money is really being spent on the actual construction of the booth, the kitchen cabinets and counter tops in the booth and the back wall and door. Right now I really would like to stick with the screen I got.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Yost
Master Film Handler

Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-15-2006 09:37 PM      Profile for Ron Yost   Email Ron Yost   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I use the same 'screen' I use for 35mm .. a sheet of matte white Formica (learned about from Brad). Works great. The little DLP machine can't compete with the 750w Xenon in my film projector, of course, but it's adequate .. for me, at least. And more than adequate if the room is totally dark. There are lots of screen shots from users of the various PJ's over at AVS .. good, bad and so-so.

Good point on the grey screen, Dave. Apparently LCD machines benefit greatly from grey screens (though I see they've improved a lot, so maybe that's not as useful as it was a couple of years ago?) but my X1 DLP machine has nice contrast without one. The blacks are pretty dam black, if the source has good black.

I see TI has come up with something called a "Dark Chip" for the latest DLP machines, which apparently improves the contrast even more. (Or maybe it's just marketing B.S.) I'm NO expert in all of this and, like I said, haven't kept up with developments much. My experience is with my one machine only, and it's fairly dated now.

Also, I've never been bothered by the effects of the color wheel that some people (apparently very few) see. Nor have any of my guests. Sometimes, during really bright scenes, when I turn my head quickly I can see the effect out of the corner of my eye for an instant, but that's it. (Reminds me of the old anaglyph 3-D days .. those really did give me headaches as a kid). The wheels have been improved in newer machines.

And Larry, you may have a bit of a problem with your curved screen. My X1 has almost NO depth-of-field (one of the advantages of spending more $ is getting an iris, from what I understand). But then, my 35mm doesn't have much DOF with short FL lenses at such a close throw, either. The X1 has less, tho.

I'd check out AVS more closely for the latest developments, but I don't want to get upgrade fever right now. [Big Grin]

Ron Yost

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-16-2006 07:25 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
The curve is very shallow. About 2 inches back in the center on a 4x8 piece of wallboard. Two things I like about it. It gives a nice professional look and it is under tension so the screen itself is very tight up on the stilts. A 3 inch strip on the top and bottom of the screen I painted flat black. So the image area is 3.5 by 8 ft.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-16-2006 08:39 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No need to curve a matte white screen. A gain screen should use a curve optimized by ray tracing to reflect the projector's light back to the center of the seating area.

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-16-2006 10:17 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
The curve is somewhat ray traced since I tied a string to where the projector is sitting at 12 feet and traced it out. I could not bend the wallboard that much to get the correct trace. So the two inch curve at in the middle of the 8 foot length of wallboard will have to do. Besides, I like the strength tension on the screen with just three 2x4's. No wiggle here.

So with $15 worth of velvet from Walmart, three 2x4's for $6 and one $9 4x8 piece of wallboard and $10 worth of paint from Lowes with another $10 worth of odds and end, the whole back wall looks finished.

I notice used low time Infocus X1's going for about $600 on Ebay. I might try that first and see how it goes. I am sure I can resell in on ebay if I feel I need an upgrade.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-16-2006 10:56 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now that you have a curved screen, you should use a gain surface. Maybe paint it with aluminum paint? Some gain could be useful if your projector is on the low side for light output.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Yost
Master Film Handler

Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-16-2006 10:17 PM      Profile for Ron Yost   Email Ron Yost   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Larry, I looked at the used X1's on ebay. Seems they're somewhat over-priced to me (don't spot any 'junkers' or road warriors), but some of them are missing accessories (like the very important remote!). There are newer 4805's there for about the same price (see below).

> DON'T get an X1a!! < I see there's one there. It's a stripped-down X1, somewhat like the X2!

Also, to make things more complicated, you might look at the listings for the Infocus Screenplay 4800 projector. Same machine as the X1, but the menu settings right out of the box are 'optimised' for showing movies, rather than business presentations. No biggie, but it does take some time to 'tweak' the X1's menu settings for our use. If you buy an X1 that has been used for movies it will probably have already been adjusted fairly well.

The Screenplay 4805 we've mentioned is the newer 16:9 machine, and there is no "X"-series equivalent. There are some refurbished ones on ebay now directly from Infocus for about the same price as the used X1's .. if you want a 16:9 machine that's a couple of years newer, with better performance than the X1's, and is 'set' for showing movies right out of the box. AND, they have a 90-day warranty. Not much, but better than nothing. They're also eligible for the extended factory warranty, which I think is $150 or so.

BTW, there's no operating-time counter for the machine itself. The only counter is for the time the lamp has been lit. A firmware counter keeps track and disables the machine when the lamp reaches 2000 hours until a new lamp module is installed.

Anyhow, good luck! Hope you like it!!

Ron Yost

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-18-2006 12:33 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Refurbished X1 for sale $US849. Might be worth looking into.

Amazon

Alternatively

Pricegrabber

Also check out the refurbished projectors at Infocus

Infocus

Note the 4805 going for $729 (in clearance, home section)

Regards Peter

[ 03-19-2006, 08:13 PM: Message edited by: Peter Berrett ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.